Word similarity (top 20)
Word | Similarity | Word | Similarity |
---|---|---|---|
Bitcoin | 0.906903 | Analysis | 0.693042 |
Ledger | 0.897149 | Challenges | 0.683677 |
Security | 0.821995 | Privacy | 0.674539 |
Distributed | 0.797730 | Trust | 0.643097 |
Block | 0.795304 | Implementation | 0.640840 |
Application | 0.756384 | Iot | 0.637737 |
Peer | 0.754152 | Smart | 0.630747 |
Public | 0.748685 | Access | 0.628037 |
Private | 0.724296 | Technology | 0.617000 |
Design | 0.715209 | Adoption | 0.613373 |
Dominant topics
Topic_Num | Topic_Perc_Contrib | Keywords | Representative text |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.99553 | Iot, system, datum, blockchain, base, network, security, device, service, application | [Network, available, network, homepage, locate, challenge, way, forward, technology, internet, t… |
1 | 0.99536 | Technology, supplychain, management, industry, datum, blockchain, system, business, service, model | [Purchase, supply, management, available, purchase, supply, management, homepage, never, walk, a… |
2 | 0.99672 | Blockchain, transaction, technology, system, information, process, base, platform, datum, business | [Express, author, intend, represent, position, opinion, wto, member, prejudice, member, obligati… |
3 | 0.99678 | Supplychain, management, system, sustainability, service, performance, product, model, customer,… | [Index, note, cross, refer, subentry, main, entry, main, entry, repeat, space, index, arrange, s… |
Computing time
Models | PCA | Word2vec | LDA |
---|---|---|---|
Computing time (seconds) | 7.39088 | 181.52167 | 105.01739 |
Ar , I.M. , Erol , I. , Peker , I. , Ozdemir , A.I. , Medeni , T.D. and Medeni , I.T. ( 2020 ), “ Evaluating the feasibility of blockchain in logistics operations: a decision framework ”, Expert Systems with Applications , Vol. 158 No. 113543 .
Asmussen , C.B. and Charles , M. ( 2019 ), “ Smart literature review: a practical topic modelling approach to do exploratory literature review ”, Journal of Big Data , Vol. 6 Article No. 1 .
Asmussen , C.B. and Charles , M. ( 2020 ), “ Enabling supply chain analytics for enterprise information systems: a topic modelling literature review and future research agenda ”, Enterprise Information Systems , Vol. 14 No. 5 , pp. 563 - 610 .
Bai , C. and Sarkis , J. ( 2020 ), “ A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology ”, International Journal of Production Research , Vol. 58 No. 7 , pp. 2142 - 2162 .
Blei , D.M. ( 2012 ), “ Probabilistic topic models ”, Communications of the ACM , Vol. 55 No. 4 , pp. 77 - 84 .
Blei , D.M. , Ng , A.Y. and Jordan , M.I. ( 2003 ), “ Latent dirichlet allocation ”, Journal of Machine Learning Research , Vol. 3 , pp. 993 - 1022 .
Blossey , G. , Eisenhardt , J. and Hahn , G. ( 2019 ), “ Blockchain technology in supply chain management: an application perspective ”, In Proceedings of the 52nd HI International Conference on System Sciences, 2019 .
Casey , M.J. and Wong , P. ( 2017 ), “ Global supply chains are about to get better, thanks to blockchain ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 13 , pp. 1 - 6 .
Chang , S.E. and Chen , Y. ( 2020 ), “ When blockchain meets supply chain: a systematic literature review on current development and potential applications ”, IEEE Access , Vol. 8 , pp. 62478 - 62494 .
Duru , O. and Zin , M.I.M. ( 2019 ), “ Blockchain roaming in the Maritime industry ”, available at: https://splash247.com/blockchain-roaming-in-the-maritime-industry/ (accessed 27 June 2020).
Eickhoff , M. and Neuss , N. ( 2017 ), “ Topic modelling methodology: its use in information systems and other managerial disciplines ”, In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) , Guimarães, Portugal , June 5-10, 2017 , pp. 1327 - 1347 .
Fiskin , C.S. and Cerit , A.G. ( 2020 ), “ Comparative bibliometric and network analysis of Maritime transport/shipping literature using the web of science literature ”, Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin , Vol. 61 No. 133 , pp. 160 - 170 .
Griffiths , T.L. , Steyvers , M. and Tenenbaum , J.B. ( 2007 ), “ Topics in semantic representation ”, Psychological Review , Vol. 114 No. 2 , pp. 211 - 244 .
Gurtu , A. and Johny , J. ( 2019 ), “ Potential of blockchain technology in supply chain management: a literature review ”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management , Vol. 49 No. 9 , pp. 881 - 900 .
Hannigan , T.R. , Haans , R.F. , Vakili , K. , Tchalian , H. , Glaser , V.L. , Wang , M.S. , Kaplan , S. and Jennings , P.D. ( 2019 ), “ Topic modeling in management research: rendering new theory from textual data ”, Academy of Management Annals , Vol. 13 No. 2 , pp. 586 - 632 .
Hotelling , H. ( 1933 ), “ Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components ”, Journal of Educational Psychology , Vol. 24 No. 6 , pp. 417 - 441 .
Iansiti , M. and Lakhani , K.R. ( 2017 ), “ The truth about blockchain ”, Harvard Business Review , Vol. 95 No. 1 , pp. 118 - 127 .
Jacobs , T. and TschöTschel , R. ( 2019 ), “ Topic models meet discourse analysis: a quantitative tool for a qualitative approach ”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology , Vol. 22 No. 5 , pp. 469 - 485 .
Kshetri , N. ( 2017 ), “ Can blockchain strengthen the internet of things? ”, IT Professional , Vol. 19 No. 4 , pp. 68 - 72 .
Kshetri , N. ( 2018 ), “ Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives ”, International Journal of Information Management , Vol. 39 , pp. 80 - 89 .
Kummer , S. , Herold , D.M. , Dobrovnik , M. , Mikl , J. and Schäfer , N. ( 2020 ), “ A systematic review of blockchain literature in logistics and supply chain management: Identifying research questions and future directions ”, Future Internet , Vol. 12 No. 3 , pp. 1 - 15 .
Lambrou , M. , Watanabe , D. and Iida , J. ( 2019a ), “ Maritime blockchains: decoding diverse strategies for value extraction ”, 27th Annual Conference of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), Paper ID 114 , pp. 1 - 22 .
Lambrou , M. , Watanabe , D. and Iida , J. ( 2019b ), “ Shipping digitalization management: conceptualization, typology and antecedents ”, Journal of Shipping and Trade , Vol. 4 No. 1 .
Lee , S.W. and Shin , S.H. ( 2019 ), “ A review of port research using computational text analysis: a comparison of Korean and international journal ”, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics , Vol. 35 No. 3 , pp. 138 - 146 .
Mikolov , T. , Chen , K. , Corrado , G. and Dean , J. ( 2013 ), “ Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space ”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 .
MIT ( 2018 ), available at: www.technologyreview.com/2018/11/10/139137/is-this-ai-we-drew-you-a-flowchart-to-work-it-out/ (accessed 02 October 2020).
Pournader , M. , Shi , Y. , Seuring , S. and Koh , S.L. ( 2020 ), “ Blockchain applications in supply chains, transport and logistics: a systematic review of the literature ”, International Journal of Production Research , Vol. 58 No. 7 , pp. 2063 - 2081 .
Queiroz , M.M. , Telles , R. and Bonilla , S.H. ( 2019 ), “ Blockchain and supply chain management integration: a systematic review of the literature”, supply chain management ”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal , Vol. 25 No. 2 , pp. 241 - 254 .
Risius , M. and Spohrer , K. ( 2017 ), “ A blockchain research framework ”, Business and Information Systems Engineering , Vol. 59 No. 6 , pp. 385 - 409 .
Roeck , D. , Sternberg , H. and Hofmann , E. ( 2020 ), “ Distributed ledger technology in supply chains: a transaction cost perspective ”, International Journal of Production Research , Vol. 58 No. 7 , pp. 2124 - 2141 .
Rogerson , M. and Parry , G.C. ( 2020 ), “ Blockchain: case studies in food supply chain visibility ”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal , Vol. 25 No. 5 , pp. 601 - 614 .
Rong , X. ( 2014 ), “ word2vec parameter learning explained ”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.2738 .
Saberi , S. , Kouhizadeh , M. , Sarkis , J. and Shen , L. ( 2019 ), “ Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management ”, International Journal of Production Research , Vol. 57 No. 7 , pp. 2117 - 2135 .
SAS ( 2020 ), available at: www.sas.com/en_us/insights/analytics/what-is-natural-language-processing-nlp.html (accessed 27 June 2020).
Shahid , M.N. ( 2020 ), “ A cross-disciplinary review of blockchain research trends and methodologies: topic modeling approach ”, In Proceedings of the 53rd HI International Conference on System Sciences .
Shin , S.H. , Kwon , O.K. , Ruan , X. , Chhetri , P. , Lee , P.T.W. and Shahparvari , S. ( 2018 ), “ Analyzing sustainability literature in Maritime studies with text mining ”, Sustainability , Vol. 10 No. 10 , pp. 1 - 19 .
Sternberg , H. and Baruffaldi , G. ( 2018 ), “ Chains in chains: logic and challenges of blockchains in supply chains ”, In 51st HI International Conference on System Sciences .
Steyvers , M. and Griffiths , T. ( 2007 ), “ Probabilistic topic models ”, Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
Treiblmaier , H. ( 2018 ), “ The impact of the blockchain on the supply chain: a theory-based research framework and a call for action ”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal , Vol. 23 No. 6 , pp. 545 - 559 .
Tsiulin , S. , Reinau , K.H. , Hilmola , O.P. , Goryaev , N. and Karam , A. ( 2020 ), “ Blockchain-based applications in shipping and port management: a literature review towards defining key conceptual frameworks ”, Review of International Business and Strategy , Vol. 30 No. 2 , pp. 201 - 224 .
Wagner , N. and Wiśnicki , B. ( 2019 ), “ Application of blockchain technology in Maritime logistics ”, In DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting , Vol. 4 No. 1 , pp. 155 - 164 .
Wang , Y. , Han , J.H. and Beynon-Davies , P. ( 2019 ), “ Understanding blockchain technology for future supply chains: a systematic literature review and research agenda”, supply chain management ”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal , Vol. 24 No. 1 , pp. 62 - 84 .
Westergaard , D. , Stærfeldt , H.H. , Tønsberg , C. , Jensen , L.J. and Brunak , S. ( 2018 ), “ A comprehensive and quantitative comparison of text-mining in 15 million full-text articles versus their corresponding abstracts ”, PLoS Computational Biology , Vol. 14 No. 2 , p. e1005962 .
Related articles, all feedback is valuable.
Please share your general feedback
Contact Customer Support
A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. © Copyright 2024 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Optimizing reserve decisions in relief supply chains with a blockchain-supported second-hand e-commerce platform.
2. literature review, 2.1. relief supplies supply chain, 2.2. rotation of perishable supplies on second-hand e-commerce platforms, 2.3. the adoption of blockchain technology, 3. model description and assumption, 3.1. problem description, 3.2. decision sequence.
4. reserve model for rotation on blockchain-enabled second-hand platforms, 4.1. government decision model, 4.1.1. government cost function in the absence of disasters, 4.1.2. government cost function in the event of a disaster, 4.2. profit function of second-hand platforms, 4.2.1. profit function of the second-hand platform in the absence of disasters, 4.2.2. profit function of the second-hand platform in the event of a disaster, 4.3. model of supply chain coordination, 4.3.1. profit model for supply chain coordination, 4.3.2. analysis of model results, 5. numerical examples, 5.1. parameter settings, 5.2. optimal decision and sensitivity analysis for second-hand platform consignment, 6. conclusions and future works, 6.1. conclusions, 6.2. limitations and future directions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, acknowledgments, conflicts of interest.
Click here to enlarge figure
Notation | Definition |
---|---|
Randomized requirements for relief supplies. Following a specific probability distribution, defining as the maximum, as the mean, and the probability density function as . denotes the cumulative distribution function, and is its inverse function. | |
Emergency level parameters: the initial range is [0, 1], with 0 indicating not urgent and 1 indicating very urgent. | |
Base unit loss cost of full relief supplies ( ) for unmet needs. Unit loss cost adjusted for urgency: . | |
Reserve difficulty parameter: the initial range is [0, 1], where 0 means easy to reserve, and 1 means very difficult to reserve. | |
The base unit material loss or expiration cost of a totally difficult reserve stock ( ). : adjusted unit loss costs, weighted for reserve difficulty. | |
Probability of a disaster occurring during the agreement cycle. | |
Physical reserves held in advance by the government. | |
Regular procurement prices for emergency supplies. | |
Unit cost of production of relief supplies in an enterprise. | |
Cost of spot purchases of relief supplies for post-disaster units. | |
Government’s willingness to use blockchain to introduce a “second-hand platform” for consignments: . | |
Selling price of “second-hand platform” goods. | |
Unit cost of consigning relief supplies on second-hand platforms introducing blockchain technology. | |
The platform’s average success rate in previous selling cycles, in [0, 1]. | |
Item traceability index, between 0 (completely untraceable) and 1 (completely traceable), with 0.5 equal to the neutral point. | |
Adjustment factor to quantify the impact of blockchain technology’s enhanced supplies’ traceability on the success rate of the sale, . | |
Success rate of selling, , . | |
Unsold salvage value. | |
Second-hand E-commerce platform commission. |
Parameters | Supply Names | Parameters | Supply Names | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceuticals (Packs) | Life Jackets (Pieces) | Pharmaceuticals (Packs) | Life Jackets (Pieces) | ||
Basic Parameters | |||||
29.394 | 8.304 | ||||
0.9871 | 0.7231 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||
100 | 100 | 258 | 169 | ||
98.71 | 72.31 | 178 | 119 | ||
0.5101 | 0.7924 | 588 | 398 | ||
60 | 40 | ||||
Parameters related to the consignment strategy of the ‘second-hand platform’ considering blockchain factors | |||||
189 | 109 | 0.826 | 0.826 | ||
5 | 5 | 40 | 10 | ||
0.7 | 0.7 | 0.05 | 0.05 | ||
0.8 | 0.8 | 0.867 | 0.689 | ||
0.6 | 0.6 |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Ju, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J.; Feng, Y.; Ren, Y. Optimizing Reserve Decisions in Relief Supply Chains with a Blockchain-Supported Second-Hand E-Commerce Platform. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2024 , 19 , 1869-1892. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030092
Ju Y, Wang Y, Yang J, Feng Y, Ren Y. Optimizing Reserve Decisions in Relief Supply Chains with a Blockchain-Supported Second-Hand E-Commerce Platform. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research . 2024; 19(3):1869-1892. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030092
Ju, Yingjie, Yue Wang, Jianliang Yang, Yu Feng, and Yuheng Ren. 2024. "Optimizing Reserve Decisions in Relief Supply Chains with a Blockchain-Supported Second-Hand E-Commerce Platform" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 19, no. 3: 1869-1892. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19030092
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Join the community, edit social preview.
Remove a code repository from this paper, mark the official implementation from paper authors, add a new evaluation result row.
TASK | DATASET | MODEL | METRIC NAME | METRIC VALUE | GLOBAL RANK | REMOVE |
---|
Add a method, remove a method, edit datasets, private blockchain-based procurement and asset management system with qr code.
12 Jul 2024 · Alonel A. Hugo , Gerard Nathaniel C. Ngo · Edit social preview
The developed system aims to incorporate a private blockchain technology in the procurement process for the supply office. The procurement process includes the canvassing, purchasing, delivery and inspection of items, inventory, and disposal. The blockchain-based system includes a distributed ledger technology, peer-to-peer network, Proof-of-Authority consensus mechanism, and SHA3-512 cryptographic hash function algorithm. This will ensure trust and proper accountability to the custodian of the property while safeguarding sensitive information in the procurement records. The extreme prototyping model will be used as software development life cycle. It is mostly used for web-based applications and has an increased user involvement. The prototype version of the system allows the users get a better understanding of the system being developed. It also reduces the time and cost, has quicker user feedback, missing and difficult functions can be recognized, and confusing processes can be addressed on an early stage. The implementation of a private blockchain technology has an increased privacy, enhanced security, improved efficiency, and reduced complexity over traditional blockchain network. The use of SHA3-512 as cryptographic hash function algorithm is much faster than its predecessors when cryptography is handled by hardware components. Furthermore, it is not vulnerable to length extension attacks making it reliable in terms of security of data. The study recommends the use of private blockchain-based technology with the procurement and asset management system in the supply office. The procurement records will be protected against tampering using this technology. This will promote trust and confidence of the stakeholders. The implementation of blockchain technology in developing a system served as advancement and innovation in terms of securing data.
Datasets edit.
New citation alert added.
This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:
You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.
To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.
Please log in to your account
Bibliometrics & citations, recommendations, research on traceability of agricultural products supply chain system based on blockchain and internet of things technology.
In this paper, the chain and the block chain thinking are introduced. Making use of the advantages of blockchain technology, this paper applies blockchain technology to the traditional agricultural product supply chain based on Internet of Things ...
At present, the application of blockchain in the traceability system has become a mainstream technology to ensure the quality and safety of agricultural products. However, blockchain is designed to ensure open and transparent data and tamper-proof, and ...
In recent years, with the occurrence of a series of major food safety accidents, people's demand for food has changed from "quantity" to "quality". Although a batch of agricultural product traceability system has also been born, but this traditional ...
Published in.
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Permissions, check for updates, author tags.
Other metrics, bibliometrics, article metrics.
Login options.
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
View options.
View or Download as a PDF file.
View online with eReader .
View this article in HTML Format.
Copying failed.
Affiliations, export citations.
We are preparing your search results for download ...
We will inform you here when the file is ready.
Your file of search results citations is now ready.
Your search export query has expired. Please try again.
Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers
Part of the book series: Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering ((LNICST,volume 442))
Included in the following conference series:
1427 Accesses
3 Citations
2 Altmetric
Purpose: Today’s supply chain management faces complex and globally distributed networks of customers and suppliers. Blockchain solutions serve as underlying IT infrastructures to connect the network participants and enable multiple applications. This paper aims at bringing together and discussing current and future research topics in the field of blockchain in supply chain management. Methodology: In the paper, seven central research topics of the field - strategic realignment of enterprises, governance and profitability considerations, as well as blockchain-based pay-per-use models, additive manufacturing, decentralized markets and cyber-physical production systems - are presented with a state of the art and a research discussion to stimulate prospective blockchain research. Findings: As an outcome, the research topics are consolidated in a research framework and categorized in strategic or application oriented approaches, as well as assigned to blockchain scientific layers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Klink, P.: FAST RAMP-UP: Anlaufmanagement nach disruptiven pandemischen Ereignissen. Whitepaper im Rahmen des Forschungsprojekts “Fast Ramp-Up”. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (2020)
Google Scholar
Guerpinar, T., Guadiana, G., Ioannidis, P. et al.: The current state of blockchain applications in supply chain management. In: International Conference on Blockchain Technology, Shanghai, China (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3460537.3460568
Schmidt, C.G., Wagner, S.M.: Blockchain and supply chain relations: a transaction cost theory perspective. J. Purch. Supply Manage. 25 , 100552 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100552
Article Google Scholar
Treleaven, P., Gendal Brown, R., Yang, D.: Blockchain technology in finance. Computer 50 , 14–17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.3571047
DIN SPEC 16597 Terminology for blockchains; Text in English. Beuth Verlag, Berlin
Pai, S., Buvat, J., Lise, O., et al.: Is blockchain the key to a new age of transparency and trust in the supply chain?: How organizations have moved from blockchain hype to reality (2018)
Düdder, B., Fomin, V., Gürpinar, T., et al.: Interdisciplinary blockchain education: utilizing blockchain technology from various perspectives. Front Blockchain 3 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.578022
Gürpinar, T., Harre, S., Henke, M., et al.: Blockchain technology – integration in supply chain processes. TUHH Universitätsbibliothek (2020)
Gürpinar, T., Straub, N., Kaczmarek, S., et al.: Blockchain-Technologie im interdisziplinären Umfeld. ZWF 114 , 605–609 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3139/104.112117
Klinger, P., Bodendorf, F.: Blockchain-based cross-organizational execution framework for dynamic integration of process collaborations. In: Gronau, N., Heine, M., Poustcchi, K. et al. (eds.) WI2020 Zentrale Tracks. GITO Verlag, pp. 1802–1817 (2020)
Kewell, B., Adams, R., Parry, G.: Blockchain for good? Strateg. Chang. 26 , 429–437 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2143
Herian, R.: Blockchain and the (re)imagining of trusts jurisprudence. Strateg. Chang. 26 , 453–460 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2145
Casino, F., Dasaklis, T.K., Patsakis, C.: A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: current status, classification and open issues. Telematics Inform. 36 , 55–81 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006
Müller, A., Graumann, M., Weiß, H.-J.: Innovationen für eine digitale Wirtschaft. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2020)
Weill, P.D.: Don’t just lead, govern: how top-performing firms govern it. MIS Q. Exec. 3 , 1–17 (2004)
Schmahl, A., Mohottala, S., Burchardi, K., et al.: Resolving the blockchain paradox in transportation and logistics (2019)
de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., Basole, R.: The digital platform: a research agenda. J. Inf. Technol. 33 , 124–135 (2018)
Parker, G., van Alstyne, M.: Innovation, openness, and platform control. Manage. Sci. 64 , 3015–3032 (2018)
Gasser, U., Budish, R., West, S.: Multistakeholder as Governance Groups: Observations from Case Studies. Berkman Center Research Publication (2015)
Andersen, J.V., Bogusz, C.I.: Self-organizing in blockchain infrastructures: generativity through shifting objectives and forking. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 20 , 1242–1273 (2019)
Cui, Z., Fei, X.U., Zhang, S., et al.: A hybrid blockchain-based identity authentication scheme for multi-WSN. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 13 , 241–251 (2020)
German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy: Blockchain strategy of the federal government - we set out the course for the token economy (2019)
Beck, R., Müller-Bloch, C., King, J.L.: Governance in the blockchain economy: a framework. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19 , 1020–1034 (2018)
Yermack, D.: Corporate governance and blockchains. Rev. Finan. 21 , 7–31 (2017)
Pelizza, A., Kuhlmann, S.: Mining governance mechanisms: innovation policy, practice, and theory facing algorithmic. In: Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense Decision-Making, pp. 495–517
de Filippi, P., McMullen, G.: Governance of blockchain systems: Governance of and by Distributed Infrastructure, Blockchain Research Institute and COALA (2018)
Fill, H.-G., Meier, A.: Blockchain: Grundlagen, Anwendungsszenarien und Nutzungspotenziale. Edition HMD (2020)
Pedersen, A., Risius, M., Beck, R.: A ten-step decision path to determine when to use blockchain technologies. MISQE 18 , 99–115 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00010
Schlecht, L., Schneider, S., Buchwald, A.: The prospective value creation potential of Blockchain in business models: a delphi study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 166 , 120601 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120601
Thommen, J.P., Achleitner, A.K.: Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftlehre, 6th edn. Gabler Verlage, Wiesbaden (2009)
Scholz-Reiter, B., Gorldt, C., Hinrichs, U., et al.: RFID - Einsatzmöglichkeiten und Potentiale in logistischen Prozessen (2007)
Peukert, S., Treber, S., Balz, S., Haefner, B., Lanza, G.: Process model for the successful implementation and demonstration of SME-based industry 4.0 showcases in global production networks. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 14 (3), 275–288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-020-00953-0
Irfan, M., Wang, M., Zafar, A.U., et al.: Modeling the enablers of supply chain strategies and information technology: improving performance through TISM approach. VJIKMS 51 , 461–491 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-06-2019-0082
Raut, R.D., Priyadarshinee, P., Gardas, B.B., et al.: Analyzing the factors influencing cloud computing adoption using three stage hybrid SEM-ANN-ISM (SEANIS) approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 134 , 98–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.020
Mishra, A.N., Pani, A.K.: Business value appropriation roadmap for artificial intelligence. VJIKMS 51 , 353–368 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2019-0107
Platzer, J.: Bitcoin kurz & gut: Banking ohne Banken, 1st edn. O’Reilly, Köln (2014)
Kesten, R., Müller, A., Schröder, H.: IT-Controlling: IT-Strategie, Multiprojektmanagement, Projektcontrolling und Performancekontrolle, 2nd edn. Vahlen, München (2013)
Klischewski, R.: Blockchains zwischen Anarchie und Governance: Steuerungsansätze für die öffentliche Verwaltung. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, Lüneburg, pp. 609–620 (2018)
Andrian, H.R., Kurniawan, N.B.: Blockchain technology and implementation : a systematic literature review. In: 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI), pp. 370–374 (2018)
Queiroz, M.M., Telles, R., Bonilla, S.H.: Blockchain and supply chain management integration: a systematic review of the literature. Supp Chain Mnagmnt 25 , 241–254 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2018-0143
Cole, R., Stevenson, M., Aitken, J.: Blockchain technology: implications for operations and supply chain management. Supp Chain Mnagmnt 24 , 469–483 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0309
Mika, B., Goudz, A.: Blockchain-Technologie in der Energiewirtschaft: Blockchain als Treiber der Energiewende, 1st ed. 2020 (2020)
Schmeiss, J.: Will Blockchain Disrupt Your Business? Zenodo (2018)
Ematinger, R.: Von der Industrie 4.0 zum Geschäftsmodell 4.0. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2018)
Simon, H.: Preismanagement in digitalen geschäftsmodellen. In: Bruhn, M., Hadwich, K.: (eds) Dienstleistungen 4.0. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, pp. 261–274 (2017)
Commerzbank, A.G.: Pressemitteilung: commerzbank bietet als erste deutsche Bank neue datenbasierte Kredite für Firmenkunden an (2018) https://www.commerzbank.de/de/hauptnavigation/presse/pressemitteilungen/archiv1/2018/quartal_18_02/presse_archiv_detail_18_02_75466.html Accessed 28 Sep 2021
Commerzbank, A.G.: Bank mit dem Blockchain-Blick (2019) https://www.commerzbank.ae/portal/media/corporatebanking/auslandsseiten/oesterreich/news/2020-5/ASPEKTE_012019_6-28-29-Commerzbank2.pdf
Kehler, M., Regier, S., Stengel, I.: An innovative IoT based financing model for SMEs. In: Proceedings of the 6th Collaborative European Research Conference (CERC 2020), pp. 361–370 (2020)
Sato, K., Nakashima, K.: Optimal pricing problem for a pay-per-use system based on the Internet of Things with intertemporal demand. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 221 , 107477 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.012
Knapp, M., Greiner, T., Yang, X.: Pay-per-use sensor data exchange between IoT devices by blockchain and smart contract based data and encryption key management. In: 2020 International Conference on Omni-layer Intelligent Systems (COINS). IEEE, pp. 1–5 (2020)
Guha, K., Saha, D., Chakrabarti, A.: Blockchain technology enabled pay per use licensing approach for hardware IPs. In: 2020 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE). IEEE, pp. 1618–1621 (2020)
Alkhader, W., Alkaabi, N., Salah, K., et al.: Blockchain-based traceability and management for additive manufacturing. IEEE Access 8 , 188363–188377 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3031536
Ernst & Young GmbH: EY´s Global 3D Prinitng Report 2019 (2019)
ING Bank NV: 3D printing: a threat to global trade: Locally printed goods could cut trade by 40% (2017)
Stöcker, C., Blechschmidt, B.: Erfahrungsbericht Genesis of Things Project: Ansätze und Herausforderungen bei der Integration von Blockchain in der additiven Fertigung und Geschäftsmodelle (2018)
Marx, K.: Herr der Daten: So sichert die Blockchain smarte Produktionsverfahren ab (2019)
Guo, D., Shiquan, L., Hao, L., et al.: A framework for personalized production based on digital twin, blockchain and additive manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0. Unpublished (2020)
Klöckner, M., Kurpjuweit, S., Velu, C., et al.: Does blockchain for 3D printing offer opportunities for business model innovation? Res. Technol. Manag. 63 , 18–27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2020.1762444
Main Incubator GmbH: Gedruckte Disruption: Additive Fertigung und die Finanzdienstleistungen (2020)
Ganne, E.: Can blockchain revolutionize international trade? (2018)
Kurz, M.: Koordination zwischen Instandhaltung und Produktion mittels Handelsmechanismus: Coordination between maintenance and production by means of a trading mechanism, 1. Auflage. Schriftenreihe Rationalisierung, Band 152. Apprimus Verlag, Aachen (2018)
Schuh, G., Kurz, M., Jussen, P., Defèr, F.: Coordination between maintenance and production by means of auction mechanisms for increased efficiency of production systems. In: Mathew, J., Lim, C.W., Ma, L., Sands, D., Cholette, M.E., Borghesani, P. (eds.) Asset Intelligence through Integration and Interoperability and Contemporary Vibration Engineering Technologies. LNME, pp. 545–554. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95711-1_54
Chapter Google Scholar
Gassner, S.: Instandhaltungsdienstleistungen in Produktionsnetzwerken. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2013)
Book Google Scholar
Uygun, Y.: Integrierte Kapazitätsbörse - Entwicklung eines Instrumentariums für den Handel mit Maschinenkapazitäten in regional-lateralen Unternehmensnetzen. Zugl.: Dortmund, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2012. Fabrikorganisation. Verl. Praxiswissen, Dortmund (2012)
Siebert, H.: Ökonomische analyse von unternehmensnetzwerken. In: Sydow, J. (ed.) Management von Netzwerkorganisationen, pp. 7–27. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (2010)
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14 , 57–74 (1989)
Cai, R.: Trust and transaction costs in industrial districts (2004)
Akerlof, G.A.: The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In: Uncertainty in economics. Elsevier, pp. 235–251 (1978)
Luhmann, N.: Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität, 5. Aufl. UTB, vol 2185. UVK-Verl.-Ges; UTB, Konstanz, Stuttgart (2014)
Lee, J., Kim, J., Moon, J.Y.: What makes Internet users visit cyber stores again? Key design factors for customer loyalty. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 305–312 (2000)
Lewicki, R.J., Bunker, B.B.: Trust in relationships: a model of development and decline. Jossey-Bass (1995)
Suematsu: Transaction Cost Management (2014)
Bretzke, W.-R.: Die möglichen Kostenvorteile der Fremdvergabe. In: Bretzke, W.-R. (ed.) Logistische Netzwerke. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 477–493 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59757-6_28
Duschek, S., Wetzel, R., Aderhold, J.: Probleme mit dem Netzwerk und Probleme mit dem Management: Ein neu justierter Blick auf relevante Dilemmata und auf Konsequencen für die Steuerung. In: Aderhold, J., Meyer, M., Wetzel, R. (eds.) Modernes Netzwerkmanagement, pp. 143–164. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (2005)
Loose, A., Sydow, J.: Vertrauen und Okonomie in Netzwerkbeziehungen- Strukturationstheoretische Betrachtungen. In: Sydow, J., Windeler, A. (eds.) Management interorganisationaler Beziehungen, pp. 160–193. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (1997)
Schweer, M.K.W.: Vertrauen als Organisationsprinzip in interorganisationalen Kooperationen. In: Schilcher, C., Will-Zocholl, M., Ziegler, M. (eds.) Vertrauen und Kooperation in der Arbeitswelt, pp. 103–121. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2012)
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., Perrone, V.: Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. 9 , 141–159 (1998)
Hawlitschek, F., Teubner, T., Weinhardt, C.: Trust in the sharing economy. Die Unternehmung 70 , 26–44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2016-1-26
Große, N., Guerpinar, T., Henke, M.: Blockchain-enabled trust in intercompany networks applying the agency theory. In: 3rd Blockchain and Internet of Things Conference (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3475992.3475994
Notheisen, B.: Engineering Decentralized Markets - A Blockchain Approach (2019)
Subramanian, H.: Decentralized blockchain-based electronic marketplaces. Commun ACM 61 , 78–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3158333
Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., Teubner, T.: The limits of trust-free systems: a literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 29 , 50–63 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005
DIN SPEC 3103: Blockchain und Distributed Ledger Technologien in Anwendungsszenarien für Industrie 4.0. Beuth Verlag, Berlin (2019)
Notheisen, B., Weinhardt, C.: The blockchain, plums, and lemons: information asymmetries & transparency in decentralized markets. Karlsruhe (2019)
Mehrwald, P., Treffers, T., Titze, M., et al.: Application of blockchain technology in the sharing economy: a model of trust and intermediation. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019)
Wieninger, S.: Vertrauen in Unternehmensnetzwerken durch Blockchain-Technologie. Apprimus Wissenschaftsverlag (2020)
Abbas, Y., Martinetti, A., Moerman, J.-J., et al.: Do you have confidence in how your rolling stock has been maintained? A blockchain-led knowledge-sharing platform for building trust between stakeholders. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 55 , 102228 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102228
Große, N.: Einsatz der Blockchain zur Schaffung von Vertrauen im Beschaffungsprozess technischer Dienstleistungen . In: Instandhaltungsforum, InFo 2021 Connected. Tagungsband. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, pp. 7–13 (2021)
Iivari, J., Hansen, M.R.P., Haj-Bolouri, A.: A framework for light reusability evaluation of design principles in design science research. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2018) (2018)
Iivari, J., Rotvit Perlt Hansen, M., Haj-Bolouri, A.: A proposal for minimum reusability evaluation of design principles. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 30 , 286–303 (2021)
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 337–355 (2013)
Kannengießer, N., Lins, S., Dehling, T., et al.: What does not fit can be made to fit! Trade-offs in distributed ledger technology designs. In: Bui, T. (ed.) Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019)
Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., et al.: Strategies for design science research evaluation. In: ECIS 2008 Proceedings, vol. 87 (2008)
Große, N., Leisen, D., Gürpinar, T., et al.: Evaluation of (De-) centralized IT technologies in the fields of cyber-physical production systems (2020). https://doi.org/10.15488/9640
Müller, T., Jazdi, N., Schmidt, J.-P., et al.: Cyber-physical production systems: enhancement with a self-organized reconfiguration management. Procedia CIRP 99 , 549–554 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.03.075
Meissner, H., Aurich, J.C.: Implications of cyber-physical production systems on integrated process planning and scheduling. Procedia Manuf. 28 , 167–173 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.12.027
Lins, T., Oliveira, R.A.R.: Cyber-physical production systems retrofitting in context of Industry 4.0. Comput. Ind. Eng. 139 , 106193 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106193
Rojas, R., Rauch, E., Matt, D.T.: Research fields and challenges to implement cyber-physical production systems in SMEs: a literature review. In: CMUJNS 20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.12982/CMUJNS.2021.022
Lee, J., Azamfar, M., Singh, J.: A blockchain enabled cyber-physical system architecture for Industry 4.0 manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 20 , 34–39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.05.003
Afanasev, M.Y., Fedosov, Y.V., Krylova, A.A., et al.: An application of blockchain and smart contracts for machine-to-machine communications in cyber-physical production systems. In: Systems IICoIC-P (ed.) Proceedings 2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS): ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 15–18 May 2018. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 13–19 (2018)
Dedeoglu, V., Dorri, A., Jurdak, R., et al.: A Journey in applying blockchain for cyberphysical systems. In: 2020 International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS): 2020 International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS) took place 7–11 January 2020 in Bangalore, India, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 383–390. IEEE (2020)
Barenji, A.V., Li, Z., Wang, W.M., et al.: Blockchain-based ubiquitous manufacturing: a secure and reliable cyber-physical system. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58 , 2200–2221 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1680899
Afanasev, M.Y., Krylova, A.A., Shorokhov, S.A., et al.: A design of cyber-physical production system prototype based on an ethereum private network. In: Balandin, S.I. (ed.) Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT: Jyväskylä, Finland, 15–18 May 2018. FRUCT Oy, Finland, pp. 3–11 (2018)
Bayhan, H., Schulze Forsthövel, R., Kaiser, P., et al.: Blockchainbasierte cyberphysische Produktionssysteme. Logistics J. Proc. (2020). https://doi.org/10.2195/lj_Proc_bayhan_de_202012_01
Smirnov, A., Teslya, N.: Robot interaction through smart contract for blockchain-based coalition formation. In: Chiabert, P., Bouras, A., Noël, F., Ríos, J. (eds.) PLM 2018. IAICT, vol. 540, pp. 611–620. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01614-2_56
Pacheco, A., Strobel, V., Dorigo, M.: A blockchain-controlled physical robot swarm communicating via an ad-hoc network. In: Dorigo, M., et al. (eds.) ANTS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12421, pp. 3–15. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60376-2_1
Ranganthan VP, Dantu R, Paul A et al. (2018) A Decentralized Marketplace Application on the Ethereum Blockchain. In: 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC). IEEE, [Place of publication not identified], pp 90–97
Gong, X., Liu, E., Wang, R.: Blockchain-based IoT application using smart contracts: case study of M2M autonomous trading. In: 2020 5th International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems: ICCCS 2020: Shanghai, China, May 15–18, 2020, pp. 781–785. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ (2020)
Notheisen, B., Hawlitschek, F., Weinhardt, C.: Breaking down the blockchain hype‐towards a blockchain market engineering approach (2017)
Gürpinar, T., Austerjost, M., Kamphues, J., Maaßen, J., Yildirim, F., Henke, M.: Blockchain technology as the backbone of the internet of things - A taxonomy of blockchain devices. In: Conference on Production Systems and Logistics, Vancouver, Canada (2022)
Download references
The work was funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Innovation, Digitalization and Energy of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia.
Authors and affiliations.
TU Dortmund University, Leonhard-Euler-Str. 5, 44227, Dortmund, Germany
Tan Gürpinar, Nick Große, Philipp Asterios Ioannidis & Michael Henke
Dachser SE, Thomas-Dachser-Str. 2, 87439, Kempten, Germany
Max Schwarzer
Fraunhofer IML, Joseph-von-Fraunhofer-Straße 2-4, 44227, Dortmund, Germany
Eugen Burov
Brutana-Metrona Group, Max-Planck-Str. 2, 50354, Hürth, Germany
Roman Stammes
TU Dortmund University, Joseph-von-Fraunhofer-Str. 2-4, 44227, Dortmund, Germany
Larissa Krämer & Rico Ahlbäumer
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Tan Gürpinar .
Editors and affiliations.
Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
Sérgio Ivan Lopes
SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
Nishu Gupta
Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
Danda B. Rawat
Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, UK
Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Hamid Reza Karimi
Reprints and permissions
© 2022 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
Cite this paper.
Gürpinar, T. et al. (2022). Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management – A Discussion of Current and Future Research Topics. In: Paiva, S., et al. Science and Technologies for Smart Cities. SmartCity 360 2021. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 442. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06371-8_32
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06371-8_32
Published : 17 June 2022
Publisher Name : Springer, Cham
Print ISBN : 978-3-031-06370-1
Online ISBN : 978-3-031-06371-8
eBook Packages : Computer Science Computer Science (R0)
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Policies and ethics
We use cookies to help our site work, to understand how it is used, and to tailor ads that are more relevant to you and your interests.
By accepting, you agree to cookies being stored on your device. You can view details and manage settings at any time on our cookies policy page.
2nd oscm symposium on blockchain research : digital economy, and sustainability innovation and the dialogue between research and industry.
from £110.00 to £200.00
Standard registration fee: £200
Student registration fee: £110
You will also have the option of booking tickets to the gala dinner at a price of £40.
In the intricate landscape of digital transformation, the convergence of groundbreaking technologies is reinventing the paradigms of business operations and supply chain management. The advent of blockchain has ushered in a new era of transparency, security, and efficiency, offering solutions previously deemed unattainable. However, the true revolution lies in blockchain's potential synergy with other disruptive technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), Augmented Reality (AR), and the immersive Metaverse.
The Operations and Supply Chain Management Conference and 2nd Symposium on Blockchain Research serves as a nexus for illuminating these synergistic potentials. This pioneering event is dedicated to unearthing the profound implications and versatile opportunities emanating from the fusion of these technologies. It is essential to explore how AI's analytical and predictive prowess, IoT's connectivity, AR's interactive visualization, and the Metaverse's comprehensive virtual ecosystems can be seamlessly integrated with blockchain's robustness to enhance supply chain solutions, operational efficiency, and customer experiences.
This conference is a clarion call for a comprehensive discourse involving policymakers, academicians, and industry leaders to chart the way forward in adopting and adapting these intertwined technologies. The conference aims to catalyze innovation, forge collaborations, and inspire the actualization of ideas that will shape the future.
Suggested research topics, but not subject to, are as follows:
Outstanding papers will be recommended to the following international top journals:
Event at the House of Parliament (By invitation only)
Conference Chairs:
The conference in 2023: Operations and Supply Chain Management Conference and 1st Symposium on Blockchain Research
Email: https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/management/conferences-and-events/oscm-cscr-conference/
Find out how to get to the University, make your way around campus and see what you can do when you get here.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
This paper aims to overview the employment of blockchain technology in the field of the supply chain. Although the technology has been widely associated with cryptocurrencies, non-financial ...
Blockchain has an immense potential to transform every step of SC, from raw materials procurement to distribution to the consumers (Goyat et al., 2019, Babich and Hilary, 2019).It also enables SC reengineering by establishing a blockchain-based BPR (Business Process Reengineering) framework (Chang et al., 2019a).Every transaction made can be restructured using blockchain technology and the ...
Blockchain technology is touted as a game-changer. Many experts consider blockchain technology as one of the disruptive innovations. Following significant success in the banking and finance sector, blockchain technology has found significant success in all fields, including health, manufacturing, transportation, disaster relief operations, and many others. Recently, the academician has ...
1. Introduction. Blockchain technology has recently gained importance as a promising technology in the area of supply chain management. For instance, Maersk used an IBM blockchain solution to efficiently track its containers around the world (Popper and Lohr, 2017).Catina Volpone vineyard (www.cantinavolpone.it) in Puglia, Italy and Ernst and Young's EZ Lab (www.ezlab.it) developed a ...
The growing interest in applying blockchain technology in the supply chain management (SCM) calls for theory-driven research to develop better understanding of its adoption, deployment and use, and its implications for the supply chain. However, theory-based research on blockchain in the supply chain is scarce.
Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that has attracted both practitioners and academics attention in recent years. Several conceptual and few empirical studies have been published focusing on addressing current issues and recommending the future research directions of supply chain management. To identify how blockchain can contribute to supply chain management, this paper conducts a ...
First, we looked through all the BCT papers between 1990 and 2022 and collected all the studies with the term "Supply Chain Management" and "BlockChain Technology", which are 2291 studies. Second, we filter by four criteria to include only the papers written in "English," where the publication status is "Final.".
Blockchain technology has emerged as a tool with the potential to enhance transparency, trust, security, and decentralization in supply chain management (SCM). This study presents a comprehensive review of the interplay between blockchain technology and SCM. By analyzing an extensive dataset of 943 articles, our exploration utilizes the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) method to delve deep ...
In this paper, a comprehensive survey of academic literature and research works relating to blockchain platforms for global supply chain management is presented. This survey will provide an overview of blockchain technology for supply chain management, summarize industry applications, highlight persistent challenges, and identify research ...
Purpose. This paper aims to strive to close the current research gap pertaining to potential implications of the blockchain for supply chain management (SCM) by presenting a framework built on four established economic theories, namely, principal agent theory (PAT), transaction cost analysis (TCA), resource-based view (RBV) and network theory (NT).
The concept of blockchain technology, which has been around for over a decade, is gaining traction in academics and the commercial world. Blockchain technology, first created for virtual currency use, has recently found wider applications. Traditional blockchain applications in supply chain management focus on increasing safety, visibility, and auditability. A new movement is underway in which ...
3. Literature Review and Analysis. 3.1. Blockchain Technology Blockchain is a disruptive information technology [12,13] and a validation [14] of a shared digital ledger (either public or private) of all digital events across the participating agents [15,16] and a new information flow and computing technology [17,18].
Findings. The paper presents an integrated research framework that illustrates the impact of blockchain on supply chain performance. The findings highlight that blockchain can affect supply chain performance directly - via one of its core technological features - and indirectly via the broader business project through which blockchain technology is implemented.
technology, companies have thought of thinking forward. This technology could help in the evolution of the supply. chain. According to analysts, blockchain technology can. enhance the contemporary ...
Supply chain management (SCM) is a core corporate activity responsible for moving commodities and services from one point to another through a variety of stakeholders. The traditional SCM is based on a centralized approach managed at the central headquarter, and all other sub-offices get instructions from the main office. Some major issues with present SCM systems are security, transactional ...
of the blockchain and supply chain literature, besides inspire both researchers and practitioners to consider the use of blockchain in different context-aware future studies. face Keywords: blockchain, supply chain, technology, supply chain integration, industry 4.0 1. INTRODUCTION The blockchain technology is an important distributed
Abstract. In the era of digital transformation, supply chain management faces major challenges induced by the lack of transparency and the evolving industry. In this context, blockchain technology has emerged as a possible answer to the future problems of the supply chain. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review on blockchain ...
Blockchain plays a crucial role in food sustainability.,The research findings offer insights for both policymakers and business managers on blockchain implementation in the supply chain.,This paper exemplifies the model as situated in the interface of human-based and machine-learned analysis, potentially offering an interesting and relevant ...
Xiaofeng Shao is a Professor in Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. His current research interest includes supply chain management, and interface of operation management and platform economy. His papers have been published in IISE Transactions, European Journal of Operational Research, International Journal of Production Economics, International Journal of ...
Providing transparency and trust among participants and stakeholders and ensuring an efficient operation are current supply chain challenges. These challenges are difficult to resolve because the records of supply chains may be exposed to alterations by participants. Blockchain technology has been identified as a promising solution to resolve these challenges. In this paper, we introduce ...
However, despite these positive discussions, existing research and practice lack specific models for directly integrating blockchain technology into relief supply chain reserves. This paper applies timestamping technology to the trade of relief supplies on second-hand platforms, and then forms a transparent and unalterable archive of material flow.
The future outlook highlights the tremendous opportunities for blockchain to enable end-to-end visibility, accountability, automation, real-time monitoring and combating counterfeiting in pharmaceutical supply chains through collaborative efforts among stakeholders. Blockchain technology has emerged as a promising solution to address persistent challenges like lack of transparency, inefficient ...
Furthermore, it is not vulnerable to length extension attacks making it reliable in terms of security of data. The study recommends the use of private blockchain-based technology with the procurement and asset management system in the supply office. The procurement records will be protected against tampering using this technology.
Blockchain technology has rapidly grown in the last decade and supply chain management has started to emerge as one of its possible fields of application. Blockchain is estimated to have a transformative impact and potentially transform and disrupt supply chains. However, despite recognizing its enormous opportunity, there is still an incomplete, dispersed, and fragmented knowledge of ...
Wang Hongmei, Yu Yuecheng. Based on block chain of food safety traceability technology research [J]. Journal of electronic design engineering, 2019, 27 (13) : 16-20 + 25. / j.carol carroll nki DZSJGC. 2019.13.004. ... this paper applies blockchain technology to the traditional agricultural product supply chain based on Internet of Things ...
The necessity for further exploration into blockchain's potential within accounting systems is underlined, suggesting a promising direction for future innovations in tamper-evident financial reporting and liquidity management. The complexity and interconnection within the financial ecosystem demand innovative solutions to improve transparency, security, and efficiency in financial reporting ...
In the past few years, blockchain, the underlying technology of Bitcoin, has received considerable attention from academia and industry. It is widely accepted that blockchain technology causes disruptive changes in supply chain operations that can overcome supply chain difficulties encountered in realizing information sharing, maintaining traceability in the entire process and improving ...
This paper proposes a novel approach utilizing a barcode based blockchain system to authenticate products and detect counterfeit items, and explores the implications of integrating blockchain technology with barcode scanning for combating counterfeit products and enhancing supply chain transparency. Abstract: Counterfeit products pose a significant threat to consumers, businesses, and ...
This paper reveals a state of the art overview and research discussion of the stated research topics as well as future research needs. Finally a research framework is presented to consolidate the findings and invite researchers to participate in advancing blockchain and supply chain management research.
The Operations and Supply Chain Management Conference and 2nd Symposium on Blockchain Research serves as a nexus for illuminating these synergistic potentials. This pioneering event is dedicated to unearthing the profound implications and versatile opportunities emanating from the fusion of these technologies.