![Nurse Practitioner Certification Nurse Practitioner Certification](https://www.nursingworld.org/~4af3ab/globalassets/content-hub/uat/new-screenshot-primary-nav-mockup-cta.jpg)
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
ANA Nursing Resources Hub
Search Resources Hub
![building critical thinking skills in nursing A female nurse leans in closely as she checks on a young patient after surgery. The little girl is wearing a hospital gown and tucked into bed as she talks with her nurse.](https://www.nursingworld.org/~492053/globalassets/content-hub/uat/hub-resources/critical-thinking-in-nursing/1-for-critical-thinking-in-nursing-tips-to-develop-the-skill-gettyimages-1951051227-hero.jpg)
Critical Thinking in Nursing: Tips to Develop the Skill
4 min read • February, 09 2024
Critical thinking in nursing helps caregivers make decisions that lead to optimal patient care. In school, educators and clinical instructors introduced you to critical-thinking examples in nursing. These educators encouraged using learning tools for assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation.
Nurturing these invaluable skills continues once you begin practicing. Critical thinking is essential to providing quality patient care and should continue to grow throughout your nursing career until it becomes second nature.
What Is Critical Thinking in Nursing?
Critical thinking in nursing involves identifying a problem, determining the best solution, and implementing an effective method to resolve the issue using clinical decision-making skills.
Reflection comes next. Carefully consider whether your actions led to the right solution or if there may have been a better course of action.
Remember, there's no one-size-fits-all treatment method — you must determine what's best for each patient.
How Is Critical Thinking Important for Nurses?
As a patient's primary contact, a nurse is typically the first to notice changes in their status. One example of critical thinking in nursing is interpreting these changes with an open mind. Make impartial decisions based on evidence rather than opinions. By applying critical-thinking skills to anticipate and understand your patients' needs, you can positively impact their quality of care and outcomes.
Elements of Critical Thinking in Nursing
To assess situations and make informed decisions, nurses must integrate these specific elements into their practice:
- Clinical judgment. Prioritize a patient's care needs and make adjustments as changes occur. Gather the necessary information and determine what nursing intervention is needed. Keep in mind that there may be multiple options. Use your critical-thinking skills to interpret and understand the importance of test results and the patient’s clinical presentation, including their vital signs. Then prioritize interventions and anticipate potential complications.
- Patient safety. Recognize deviations from the norm and take action to prevent harm to the patient. Suppose you don't think a change in a patient's medication is appropriate for their treatment. Before giving the medication, question the physician's rationale for the modification to avoid a potential error.
- Communication and collaboration. Ask relevant questions and actively listen to others while avoiding judgment. Promoting a collaborative environment may lead to improved patient outcomes and interdisciplinary communication.
- Problem-solving skills. Practicing your problem-solving skills can improve your critical-thinking skills. Analyze the problem, consider alternate solutions, and implement the most appropriate one. Besides assessing patient conditions, you can apply these skills to other challenges, such as staffing issues .
![building critical thinking skills in nursing A diverse group of three (3) nursing students working together on a group project. The female nursing student is seated in the middle and is pointing at the laptop screen while talking with her male classmates.](https://www.nursingworld.org/~492053/globalassets/content-hub/uat/hub-resources/critical-thinking-in-nursing/2-for-critical-thinking-in-nursing-tips-to-develop-the-skill-gettyimages-1337336170-featured-thumbnail.jpg)
How to Develop and Apply Critical-Thinking Skills in Nursing
Critical-thinking skills develop as you gain experience and advance in your career. The ability to predict and respond to nursing challenges increases as you expand your knowledge and encounter real-life patient care scenarios outside of what you learned from a textbook.
Here are five ways to nurture your critical-thinking skills:
- Be a lifelong learner. Continuous learning through educational courses and professional development lets you stay current with evidence-based practice . That knowledge helps you make informed decisions in stressful moments.
- Practice reflection. Allow time each day to reflect on successes and areas for improvement. This self-awareness can help identify your strengths, weaknesses, and personal biases to guide your decision-making.
- Open your mind. Don't assume you're right. Ask for opinions and consider the viewpoints of other nurses, mentors , and interdisciplinary team members.
- Use critical-thinking tools. Structure your thinking by incorporating nursing process steps or a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) to organize information, evaluate options, and identify underlying issues.
- Be curious. Challenge assumptions by asking questions to ensure current care methods are valid, relevant, and supported by evidence-based practice .
Critical thinking in nursing is invaluable for safe, effective, patient-centered care. You can successfully navigate challenges in the ever-changing health care environment by continually developing and applying these skills.
Images sourced from Getty Images
Related Resources
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Smiling female medical practitioner attends to smiling patient in hospital bed](https://www.nursingworld.org/~491a48/globalassets/content-hub/uat/hub-resources/ways-nurses-can-improve-patient-care/1-for-116n-improving-patient-care_gettyimages-465491691-featured-thumbnail.jpg)
Item(s) added to cart
What is Critical Thinking in Nursing? (With Examples, Importance, & How to Improve)
![building critical thinking skills in nursing building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.nursingprocess.org/bimg/critical-thinking-in-nursing.webp)
Successful nursing requires learning several skills used to communicate with patients, families, and healthcare teams. One of the most essential skills nurses must develop is the ability to demonstrate critical thinking. If you are a nurse, perhaps you have asked if there is a way to know how to improve critical thinking in nursing? As you read this article, you will learn what critical thinking in nursing is and why it is important. You will also find 18 simple tips to improve critical thinking in nursing and sample scenarios about how to apply critical thinking in your nursing career.
What is Critical Thinking in Nursing?
4 reasons why critical thinking is so important in nursing, 1. critical thinking skills will help you anticipate and understand changes in your patient’s condition., 2. with strong critical thinking skills, you can make decisions about patient care that is most favorable for the patient and intended outcomes., 3. strong critical thinking skills in nursing can contribute to innovative improvements and professional development., 4. critical thinking skills in nursing contribute to rational decision-making, which improves patient outcomes., what are the 8 important attributes of excellent critical thinking in nursing, 1. the ability to interpret information:, 2. independent thought:, 3. impartiality:, 4. intuition:, 5. problem solving:, 6. flexibility:, 7. perseverance:, 8. integrity:, examples of poor critical thinking vs excellent critical thinking in nursing, 1. scenario: patient/caregiver interactions, poor critical thinking:, excellent critical thinking:, 2. scenario: improving patient care quality, 3. scenario: interdisciplinary collaboration, 4. scenario: precepting nursing students and other nurses, how to improve critical thinking in nursing, 1. demonstrate open-mindedness., 2. practice self-awareness., 3. avoid judgment., 4. eliminate personal biases., 5. do not be afraid to ask questions., 6. find an experienced mentor., 7. join professional nursing organizations., 8. establish a routine of self-reflection., 9. utilize the chain of command., 10. determine the significance of data and decide if it is sufficient for decision-making., 11. volunteer for leadership positions or opportunities., 12. use previous facts and experiences to help develop stronger critical thinking skills in nursing., 13. establish priorities., 14. trust your knowledge and be confident in your abilities., 15. be curious about everything., 16. practice fair-mindedness., 17. learn the value of intellectual humility., 18. never stop learning., 4 consequences of poor critical thinking in nursing, 1. the most significant risk associated with poor critical thinking in nursing is inadequate patient care., 2. failure to recognize changes in patient status:, 3. lack of effective critical thinking in nursing can impact the cost of healthcare., 4. lack of critical thinking skills in nursing can cause a breakdown in communication within the interdisciplinary team., useful resources to improve critical thinking in nursing, youtube videos, my final thoughts, frequently asked questions answered by our expert, 1. will lack of critical thinking impact my nursing career, 2. usually, how long does it take for a nurse to improve their critical thinking skills, 3. do all types of nurses require excellent critical thinking skills, 4. how can i assess my critical thinking skills in nursing.
• Ask relevant questions • Justify opinions • Address and evaluate multiple points of view • Explain assumptions and reasons related to your choice of patient care options
5. Can I Be a Nurse If I Cannot Think Critically?
![building critical thinking skills in nursing building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.nursingprocess.org/images/Darby-Faubion-Writer-Image.jpg)
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Nurseship.com](https://nurseship.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/nurship-logo.png.webp)
How To Improve Critical Thinking Skills In Nursing? 24 Strategies With Examples
![building critical thinking skills in nursing how-to-improve-critical-thinking-skills-in-nursing-strategies-methods-ways-improving-nurses-examples](https://nurseship.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/how-to-improve-critical-thinking-skills-in-nursing-strategies-methods-ways-improving-nurses-examples.jpg)
Last updated on August 19th, 2023
Nurses play a critical role in making critical decisions that directly impact patient outcomes in the dynamic field of healthcare. Developing strong critical thinking skills is essential for success in this role.
In this article, we present a comprehensive list of 23 nursing-specific strategies aimed at improving critical thinking and improve the quality of patient care.
24 Strategies to improve critical thinking skills in nursing
You may also want to check out: 15 Attitudes of Critical Thinking in Nursing (Explained W/ Examples)
1. Reflective Journaling: Delving into Deeper Understanding
Reflective journaling is a potent tool for nurses to explore their experiences, actions, and decisions.
By regularly pondering over situations and analyzing their thought processes, nurses can identify strengths and areas for improvement.
This practice encourages the conscious development of critical thinking by comparing past experiences with current knowledge and exploring alternative solutions.
After a particularly challenging case, a nurse reflects on their decision-making process, exploring what worked well and what could have been done differently.
2. Meeting with Colleagues: Collaborative Learning for Critical Thinking
Regular interactions with colleagues foster a collaborative learning environment. Sharing experiences, discussing diverse viewpoints, and providing constructive feedback enhance critical thinking skills .
Colleagues’ insights can challenge assumptions and broaden perspectives, ultimately leading to more well-rounded clinical judgments.
A nursing team gathers to discuss a recent complex case, sharing their perspectives, insights, and lessons learned to collectively improve patient care strategies.
3. Concept Mapping: Visualizing Complexity
Concept mapping is an excellent technique to synthesize intricate patient information. By creating visual representations of patient problems and interventions, nurses can identify relationships and patterns that might not be apparent otherwise.
This strategy aids in comprehensive care planning and encourages nurses to think holistically about patient care.
Creating a concept map to connect patient symptoms, diagnostics, and interventions reveals patterns that help the nurse formulate a comprehensive care plan.
4. Socratic Questioning: Digging Deeper into Situations
The art of Socratic questioning involves asking probing questions that lead to deeper understanding.
Applying this technique allows nurses to uncover assumptions, examine inconsistencies, and explore multiple viewpoints.
This approach is especially valuable when reviewing patient history, discussing conditions, and planning care strategies.
When assessing a patient’s deteriorating condition, a nurse asks probing questions to uncover potential underlying causes and prioritize appropriate interventions.
5. Inductive and Deductive Reasoning: From Specifics to Generalizations
Developing skills in both inductive and deductive reasoning equips nurses to analyze situations from different angles.
Inductive reasoning involves drawing conclusions from specific observations, while deductive reasoning starts with general premises to arrive at specific conclusions.
Proficient use of these methods enhances nurses’ ability to make accurate clinical judgments.
When encountering a series of patients with similar symptoms, a nurse uses inductive reasoning to identify a common pattern and deduce potential causes.
6. Distinguishing Statements: Fact, Inference, Judgment, and Opinion
Clear thinking demands the ability to differentiate between statements of fact, inference, judgment, and opinion.
Nurses must critically evaluate information sources, ensuring they rely on evidence-based practice.
This skill safeguards against misinformation and supports informed decision-making.
While reviewing a patient’s history, a nurse differentiates factual medical information from inferences and subjective judgments made by different healthcare professionals.
7. Clarifying Assumptions: Promoting Effective Communication
Recognizing assumptions and clarifying their underlying principles is vital for effective communication. Nurses often hold differing assumptions, which can impact patient care.
By acknowledging these assumptions and encouraging open discussions, nursing teams can collaboratively create care plans that align with patients’ best interests.
Before suggesting a treatment plan, a nurse engages in a conversation with a patient to understand their cultural beliefs and preferences, ensuring assumptions are not made.
8. Clinical Simulations: Learning through Virtual Scenarios
Clinical simulations provide nurses with a risk-free environment to practice decision-making and problem-solving skills.
These virtual scenarios mimic real-life patient situations and allow nurses to test different approaches, assess outcomes, and reflect on their choices.
By engaging in simulations, nurses can refine their critical thinking abilities, learn from mistakes, and gain confidence in their clinical judgment.
Engaging in a simulated scenario where a patient’s condition rapidly changes challenges a nurse’s decision-making skills in a controlled environment.
9. Case Studies and Grand Rounds: Analyzing Complex Cases
Engaging in case studies and participating in grand rounds exposes nurses to complex patient cases that require in-depth analysis.
Working through these scenarios encourages nurses to consider various factors, potential interventions, and their rationale.
Discussing these cases with colleagues and experts fosters collaborative critical thinking and widens the spectrum of possible solutions.
Nurses participate in grand rounds, discussing a challenging case involving multiple medical specialties, encouraging a holistic approach to patient care.
10. Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning: Expanding Knowledge
Staying up-to-date with the latest advancements in nursing and healthcare is crucial for effective critical thinking.
Pursuing continuing education opportunities, attending conferences, and engaging in self-directed learning keeps nurses informed about new research, technologies, and best practices.
This continuous learning enriches their knowledge base, enabling them to approach patient care with a well-rounded perspective.
Attending a nursing conference on the latest advancements in wound care equips a nurse with evidence-based techniques to improve patient outcomes.
11. Debates and Discussions: Encouraging Thoughtful Dialogue
Organizing debates or participating in structured discussions on healthcare topics stimulates critical thinking.
Engaging in debates requires researching and presenting evidence-based arguments, promoting the evaluation of different perspectives.
Nurses can exchange insights, challenge assumptions, and refine their ability to defend their viewpoints logically.
Engaging in a debate on the pros and cons of a new treatment method encourages nurses to critically analyze different viewpoints and strengthen their own understanding.
12. Multidisciplinary Collaboration: Gaining Insights from Various Disciplines
Collaborating with professionals from diverse healthcare disciplines enriches nurses’ critical thinking.
Interacting with doctors, pharmacists, therapists, and other experts allows nurses to benefit from different viewpoints and approaches.
This cross-disciplinary collaboration broadens their understanding and encourages innovative problem-solving.
Collaborating with physical therapists, nutritionists, and pharmacists helps a nurse develop a holistic care plan that addresses all aspects of a patient’s recovery.
13. Ethical Dilemma Analysis: Balancing Patient Autonomy and Best Practice
Ethical dilemmas are common in nursing practice. Analyzing these situations requires nurses to weigh the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice.
By critically examining ethical scenarios, nurses develop the capacity to navigate morally complex situations, prioritize patient welfare, and make ethically sound decisions.
When faced with a patient’s refusal of treatment due to religious beliefs, a nurse evaluates the ethical considerations, respects autonomy, and seeks alternatives.
14. Root Cause Analysis: Investigating Adverse Events
When adverse events occur, performing a root cause analysis helps identify the underlying causes and contributing factors.
Nurses engage in a systematic process of analyzing events, exploring the “5 Whys” technique , and developing strategies to prevent similar occurrences in the future.
This approach cultivates a thorough and analytical approach to problem-solving.
After a medication error, a nurse leads a root cause analysis to identify system failures and implement preventive measures to enhance patient safety.
15. Creative Thinking Exercises: Expanding Solution Repertoire
Encouraging creative thinking through brainstorming sessions or scenario-based exercises widens the range of possible solutions nurses consider.
By thinking outside the box and exploring innovative approaches, nurses develop adaptable problem-solving skills that can be applied to complex patient care challenges.
Brainstorming creative approaches to comfort a distressed pediatric patient empowers a nurse to find innovative methods beyond routine interventions.
16. Journal Clubs: Fostering Evidence-Based Discussion
Participating in journal clubs involves healthcare professionals coming together to dissect recent research articles.
This practice ignites critical thinking by allowing nurses to evaluate study methodologies, scrutinize findings, and consider the implications for their practice.
Engaging in evidence-based discussions not only cultivates a culture of critical inquiry but also reinforces continuous learning.
At the monthly journal club meeting, Nurse Mark engages in a discussion on a recent research article focusing on pain management strategies for post-operative patients.
The group analyzes the study design, scrutinizes the findings, and considers the potential implications for their practice.
During the discussion, Mark raises thought-provoking questions about the study’s methodology and suggests potential applications in their hospital’s patient care protocols.
This active participation in journal clubs not only refines Mark’s critical thinking but also instills evidence-based practices into his nursing approach.
17. Critical Reflection Groups: Collaborative Learning and Analysis
Similarly, establishing critical reflection groups, where nurses meet regularly to discuss experiences, cases, and challenges, fosters collective learning.
These sessions encourage the exchange of diverse perspectives, enriching the analysis process and ultimately enhancing patient care strategies.
Through shared insights and discussions, nurses can refine their clinical reasoning and broaden their problem-solving capabilities.
Nurse Emma actively participates in critical reflection groups in order to broaden her clinical knowledge. During a recent meeting, the group tackled a difficult patient case with complicated symptomatology.
Emma suggests alternative diagnostic pathways based on her own experiences. Emma’s critical thinking skills are honed as a result of the group’s dynamic interaction, which also emphasizes the importance of collaborative decision-making in complex scenarios.
18. Mindfulness and Reflection Practices: Enhancing Self-Awareness
Mindfulness techniques, such as meditation and deep breathing, encourage self-awareness and a clear mind.
Engaging in these practices helps nurses become more attuned to their thoughts and emotions, leading to better self-regulation and improved decision-making during high-pressure situations.
Engaging in mindfulness exercises before a demanding shift helps a nurse maintain focus, manage stress, and make clear-headed decisions.
19. Problem-Based Learning: Applying Knowledge in Real Scenarios
Problem-based learning involves presenting nurses with real-world patient cases and encouraging them to collaboratively solve the problems.
This approach bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, fostering critical thinking through active problem-solving.
Working through a simulated patient case challenges nurses to apply theoretical knowledge to practical situations, refining their clinical reasoning.
20. Self-Assessment and Feedback: Evaluating Decision-Making Skills
Regularly assessing one’s own decision-making process and seeking feedback from peers and mentors is essential for improvement.
Reflecting on past decisions, considering alternative approaches, and understanding the rationale behind them contribute to the refinement of critical thinking skills.
A nurse evaluates their performance after a patient’s unexpected complication, seeking feedback from peers and mentors to identify areas for improvement.
21. Cultural Competence Training: Navigating Diverse Perspectives
Cultural competence training enhances critical thinking by enabling nurses to understand the diverse cultural beliefs and practices of patients.
This knowledge is vital for providing patient-centered care, as it encourages nurses to think critically about the unique needs of each individual.
A nurse attends cultural competence training to understand the dietary preferences of a diverse patient population, ensuring respectful and patient-centered care.
22. Active Listening and Empathetic Communication: Gathering Insights
Active listening and empathetic communication with patients and their families enable nurses to gather comprehensive information about their conditions, concerns, and preferences.
This data forms the basis for critical analysis and informed decision-making in patient care.
Through attentive listening, a nurse uncovers a patient’s underlying concerns, leading to an informed care plan that addresses both medical needs and emotional well-being.
23. Mentorship and Preceptorship: Learning from Experienced Professionals
Having a mentor or preceptor provides novice nurses with the opportunity to learn from experienced professionals.
Mentors guide critical thinking by sharing their insights, challenging assumptions, and offering guidance in complex situations. This relationship fosters growth and expertise development.
A novice nurse gains valuable insight from a mentor, who guides them through complex cases, offering real-world wisdom and refining critical thinking skills.
24. Self-Assessment and Feedback: Evaluating Decision-Making Skills
Reflecting on past decisions, considering alternative approaches, and understanding the rationale behind them contribute to the refinement of critical thinking skills .
Nurse Sarah regularly takes time to assess her decision-making skills by reviewing past patient cases. After a challenging case involving conflicting symptoms, she reflects on her initial approach, the outcomes, and what she could have done differently.
She seeks feedback from her senior colleague, who provides insights on alternative diagnostic paths. Sarah’s self-assessment and feedback-seeking process enable her to identify areas for improvement and refine her critical thinking in similar situations.
- Clinical Reasoning In Nursing (Explained W/ Example)
- 8 Stages Of The Clinical Reasoning Cycle
- What is Critical Thinking in Nursing? (Explained W/ Examples)
Enhancing critical thinking skills is an ongoing journey that transforms nursing practice.
Reflective journaling, collaborative learning, concept mapping, Socratic questioning , reasoning techniques, distinguishing statements, and clarifying assumptions all play integral roles in nurturing these skills.
By incorporating these strategies into their daily routines, nurses can improve their critical thinking skills.
Additionally, this will help nurses in navigating the complexities of the healthcare field with confidence, expertise, and the ability to make well-informed decisions that improve patient outcomes.
Comments are closed.
Medical & Legal Disclaimer
All the contents on this site are for entertainment, informational, educational, and example purposes ONLY. These contents are not intended to be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or practice guidelines. However, we aim to publish precise and current information. By using any content on this website, you agree never to hold us legally liable for damages, harm, loss, or misinformation. Read the privacy policy and terms and conditions.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://nurseship.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/cropped-nurseship-512px-logo-2.png.webp)
Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
© 2024 nurseship.com. All rights reserved.
28.2 Developing Critical Thinking Skills
Learning objectives.
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
- Analyze the types of thinking used in nursing
- Recognize when to use the different types of thinking in nursing
- Explore the application of knowledge to thinking in nursing
- Appy Critical Thinking Indicators (CTIs) to decision making
Thinking is something we usually do subconsciously, because we are not usually “thinking about thinking.” However, with the ever-increasing autonomy being afforded to nurses, there is also an increased need for nurses to be able to critically think effectively and intentionally. Being able to critically think helps nurses’ problem solve, generate solutions, and make sound clinical judgments that affect the lives of their patients. Keep reading to learn more about how nurses use critical thinking in practice and how you can develop your own critical thinking skills.
Types of Thinking Used in Nursing
Nurses make decisions while providing patient care by using critical thinking and clinical reasoning. In nursing, critical thinking is a broad term that includes reasoning about clinical issues such as teamwork, collaboration, and streamlining workflow.” On the other hand, clinical reasoning is defined as a complex cognitive process that uses formal and informal thinking strategies to gather and analyze patient information, evaluate the significance of this information, and weigh alternative actions. Each of these types of thinking is described in more detail in the following sections.
Cognitive Thinking
The term cognitive thinking refers to the mental processes and abilities a nurse uses to interpret, analyze, and evaluate information in their practice. Basically, it encompasses how nurses think about the practice decisions they are making. Cognitive thinking and critical thinking go hand in hand because nurses must be able to use their knowledge and mental processes to devise solutions and actions when caring for patients. Using critical thinking means that nurses take extra steps to maintain patient safety and do not just follow orders. It also means the accuracy of patient information is validated and plans for caring for patients are based on their needs, current clinical practice, and research. Critical thinkers possess certain attitudes that foster rational thinking:
- confidence: believing in yourself to complete a task or activity
- curiosity: asking “why” and wanting to know more
- fair-mindedness: treating every viewpoint in an unbiased, unprejudiced way
- independence of thought: thinking on your own
- insight into egocentricity and sociocentricity: thinking of the greater good and not just thinking of yourself. Knowing when you are thinking of yourself (egocentricity) and when you are thinking or acting for the greater good (sociocentricity)
- integrity: being honest and demonstrating strong moral principles
- intellectual humility: recognizing your intellectual limitations and abilities
- interest in exploring thoughts and feelings: wanting to explore different ways of knowing
- nonjudgmental: using professional ethical standards and not basing your judgments on your own personal or moral standards
- perseverance: persisting in doing something despite it being difficult
Cognitive thinking is significant to nursing because it provides a foundation on which nurses can make rapid and accurate decisions in clinical practice. Nurses must be able to think quickly and make informed decisions to promote optimal patient outcomes.
Effective Thinking
To make sound judgments about patient care, nurses must generate alternatives, weigh them against the evidence, and choose the best course of action. The ability to clinically reason develops over time and is based on knowledge and experience. Inductive and deductive reasoning are important critical thinking skills. They help the nurse use clinical judgment when implementing the nursing process. Effective thinking in nursing involves the integration of clinical knowledge and critical thinking to make the best decisions for patients. For example, if a nurse was caring for a patient who presents with hypertension and new-onset left-sided weakness, it is important that the nurse be able to quickly consider potential causes for the weakness and implement immediate stroke protocols. Without the ability to critically think, the nurse may overlook the weakness as being unrelated to the hypertension and not consider the possibility of stroke, leading to a poor patient outcome. Thus, it is imperative that nurses develop effective thinking skills.
Inductive Reasoning
The term inductive reasoning involves noticing cues, making generalizations, and creating hypotheses. Cues are data that fall outside of expected findings and give the nurse a hint or indication of a patient’s potential problem or condition. The nurse organizes these cues into patterns and creates a generalization. A generalization is a judgment formed on the basis of a set of facts, cues, and observations and is similar to gathering pieces of a jigsaw puzzle into patterns until the whole picture becomes clearer. On the basis of generalizations created from patterns of data, the nurse creates a hypothesis regarding a patient problem. Remember, a hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a situation. It attempts to explain the “why” behind the problem that is occurring. If a “why” is identified, then a solution can begin to be explored. No one can draw conclusions without first noticing cues. Paying close attention to a patient, the environment, and interactions with family members is critical for inductive reasoning. As you work to improve your inductive reasoning, begin by first noticing details about the things around you. Be mindful of your five primary senses: the things that you hear, feel, smell, taste, and see. Nurses need strong inductive reasoning patterns and be able to act quickly, especially in emergency situations. They can see how certain objects or events form a pattern (or a generalization) that indicates a common problem.
Consider this example: A nurse assesses a patient who has undergone surgery and finds the surgical incision site is red, warm, and tender to the touch. The nurse recognizes these cues form a pattern of signs of infection and creates a hypothesis that the incision has become infected. The provider is notified of the patient’s change in condition, and a new prescription is received for an antibiotic. This is an example of the use of inductive reasoning in nursing practice.
Deductive Reasoning
Another type of critical thinking is deductive reasoning ; it is referred to as “top-down thinking.” Deductive reasoning relies on using a general standard or rule to create a strategy. Nurses use standards set by their state’s Nurse Practice Act, federal regulations, the American Nursing Association, professional organizations, and their employer to make decisions about patient care and solve problems.
Think about this example: On the basis of research findings, hospital leaders determine patients recover more quickly if they receive adequate rest. The hospital creates a policy for quiet zones at night by initiating no overhead paging, promoting low-speaking voices by staff, and reducing lighting in the hallways. The nurse further implements this policy by organizing care for patients that promotes periods of uninterrupted rest at night. This is an example of deductive thinking, because the intervention is applied to all patients regardless of whether they have difficulty sleeping or not.
Identify the Purpose of Thinking
Rationalizing the purpose of thinking is probably not something you do often, but it is the foundational first step in critical thinking. To effectively use critical thinking in practice, the nurse must first identify the purpose of thinking. For example, the nurse is caring for a patient who presents with fever, tachycardia, and shortness of breath. The patient also has an open, infected wound on the left foot that is not healing. The nurse must recognize that the patient is exhibiting signs and symptoms that may be indicative of an underlying problem. At this point, the nurse must be able to identify that the purpose of thinking with regard to the patient is to consider what might be happening with the patient and formulate a plan of care. This begins the process of critical thinking, which involves several steps: thinking ahead, thinking in action, and reflection on thinking.
Thinking Ahead
Thinking ahead in nursing involves considering what may be going on with the patient to anticipate potential outcomes and complications that may arise. Remember competent nurses are proactive versus reactive. Reactive nursing is letting situations arise and then responding to the change, but proactive nursing is recognizing cues behaviors and patterns that are leading up to a complicated event. Additionally, the nurse will formulate goals of care and must try to anticipate specific needs the patient will have. Considering the patient discussed in the preceding paragraph, the nurse should begin the process of thinking ahead about potential outcomes and complications. The nurse may hypothesize that the patient is starting to develop sepsis from the open wound on the foot so severe sepsis and/or septic shock could be a complication to begin preparing for. The nurse thinks ahead about goals of care for the patient and determines that wound care to prevent infection spread and sepsis is the priority goal at this time.
Thinking in Action
Thinking in action encompasses the thought processes occurring while the nurse is performing interventions. So, if the nurse in our example begins performing wound care, they are thinking about the best dressing to use, how to clean the wound, and if antibiotics should be considered. All of these thoughts are likely occurring as the nurse is providing the care; thus, they are examples of how the nurse is using thinking in action.
Reflection on Thinking
After performing interventions or making decisions, the nurse should reflect on the thinking that occurred. The nurse will use this thinking process to determine if the decision was reactive or responsive. Reactive decision-making involves responding to situations after they have occurred, often in a hurried or unplanned manner. These decisions tend to be impulsive and are driven by immediate needs or crises. Responsive decisions, on the other hand, involve careful deliberation about how to address a situation based on careful consideration of information. In our example, the nurse’s decision appears to have been responsive. The patient was exhibiting some altered vital signs, but nothing indicated that the situation had become emergent yet. The nurse was able to think carefully about the patient’s situation and determine that wound care was the highest priority and begin to implement care in a calm, deliberate manner. In an ideal world, all nursing decisions would be responsive, but in a lot of cases, they must be reactive because of situation severity and medical emergencies.
Application of Knowledge
During the outset of the critical thinking process, nurses must judge whether their knowledge is accurate, complete, factual, timely, and relevant. This can be done by applying knowledge to nursing practice in a multitude of ways, including drawing from past education and experience in nursing and using professional resources and standards. Each of these is discussed in more detail in the following sections.
Knowledge Base
Becoming a nurse requires years of schooling, which contributes to the development of a robust knowledge base. Nurses receive formal education and training that provides them foundational knowledge in anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, and patient care techniques, among many others. Additionally, nurses are required to complete continuing education courses specific to their chosen practice setting, further developing their knowledge base. When applying knowledge in practice, nurses can draw from their knowledge base and make informed decisions about patient care.
Experience in Nursing
Nursing is considered a practice. Nursing practice means we learn from our mistakes and our past experiences and apply this knowledge to our next patient or to the next population we serve. As nurses gain more experience, they can use what they have learned in practice and apply it to new patient situations. Each new encounter with a patient presents unique challenge and learning opportunities that contribute to the development of clinical expertise. Reflecting on these experiences allows nurses to recognize patterns, anticipate patient outcomes, and refine their decision-making processes. Whether they are identifying effective nursing interventions for common conditions, adapting care plans to individual patient needs, or navigating complex situations with compassion, nurses draw upon their accumulated knowledge base from clinical experience to provide high-quality, patient-centered care. Through reflection and continuous learning from past experiences, nurses enhance their clinical skills, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Professional Resources and Standards
In addition to foundational knowledge bases and experience, nurses can also use professional resources and standards to gain and apply knowledge in practice. Nurses can refer to clinical practice guidelines that have been established by professional organizations and healthcare institutions to help provide a framework for implementing nursing interventions based on the best evidence. By following the guidelines, nurses are ensuring that their care aligns with established standards and promotes optimal patient outcomes. Additionally, nurses should remain up to date about new and emerging research in their practice area, which can be obtained by reading professional journals and publications and attending conferences, workshops, and other trainings. Nurses can use the information learned from these resources to influence practice and ensure the highest standards of care are being performed in their practice setting. By staying informed about the latest developments in nursing and health care, nurses enhance their knowledge base and can adapt their practice to incorporate new evidence and innovations. Along with professional development and staying current with professional practices, nursing students should actively seek and join professional organizations such as critical care nursing or oncology nursing societies because this will lead the student to become expert in that subject and stay relevant with current evidence and practice guidelines.
Clinical Safety and Procedures (QSEN)
Qsen competency: evidence-based practice.
Definition: Providing quality patient care based on up-to-date, theory-derived research and knowledge, rather than personal beliefs, advice, or traditional methods.
Knowledge: The nurse will describe how the strength and relevance of available evidence influences the choice of intervention in provision of patient-centered care.
Skill: The nurse will:
- subscribe to professional journals that produce original research and evidence-based reports related to their specific area of practice
- become familiar with current evidence-based clinical practice topics and guidelines
- assist in creating a work environment that welcomes new evidence into standards of practice
- question the rational for traditional methods of care that result in sub-par outcomes or adverse events
Attitude: The nurse will appreciate the importance of regularly reading relevant professional journals.
Critique of Decision
After determining the best course of action based on the application of knowledge, the nurse can critique the decisions that were made. Specifically, the nurse will use self-reflection to review their actions and thoughts that led them to the decision. The nurse will consider the outcomes of their chosen interventions, reflect on the effectiveness of their approach, and identify areas of improvement. Additionally, the nurse may seek feedback from colleagues to obtain different perspectives about decisions made. Soliciting input from others helps the nurse gain insight and learn from their peers to further inform their future practice. Reflection questions that the nurse may ask themselves to critique their decision include the following:
- Was the patient goal or outcome met?
- Could the intervention have been done differently? Could it have been done better?
- What are alternative decisions that could have been made? What are the merits of each?
Critical Thinking Indicators
Certain behaviors that demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that promote critical thinking are called critical thinking indicators (CTIs) . Critical thinking indicators are tangible actions that are performed to assess and improve your thinking skills.
4-Circle CT Model
There are many models and frameworks within nursing and other disciplines that attempt to explain the process of critical thinking. One of the most popular is Alfaro-LeFevre’s 4-Circle CT Model (Alfaro-LeFevre, 2016). This model breaks critical thinking into four components: personal characteristics, intellectual and cognitive abilities, interpersonal abilities and self-management, and technical skills. These four components overlap, forming interconnections in critical thinking.
Link to Learning
Learn more here about the 4-Circle CT Model and see an illustration of it.
Personal Critical Thinking Indicators
Personal CTIs are behaviors that are indicative of critical thinkers. Some of these behaviors that are most relevant to nursing include:
- confidence and resilience: showing ability to reason and learn and overcoming problems
- curiosity and inquisitiveness: asking questions and looking for the “why” behind things
- effective communication: listening well, showing understanding for others thoughts and feelings, and speaking and writing with clarity
- flexibility: changing approaches as needed to obtain the best results
- honesty: looking for the truth and demonstrating integrity while adhering to moral and ethical standards
- self-awareness: being able to identify one’s own knowledge gaps and acknowledge when thinking may be negatively influenced by emotions or self-interests.
Personal Knowledge and Intellectual Skills
Personal knowledge and intellectual skills encompass the knowledge gained from nursing school and clinical experiences. Examples of each of these kinds of skills are listed in Table 28.3 .
Personal Knowledge | Intellectual Skills |
---|---|
Interpersonal and Self-Management Skills
Interpersonal and self-management skills encompass the knowledge and skills needed for effective collaboration. These include:
- addressing conflicts fairly
- advocating for patients, self, and others
- dealing with complaints constructively
- establishing empowered partnerships
- facilitating and navigating change
- fostering positive interpersonal relationships and promoting teamwork
- giving and taking constructive criticism
- leading, motivating, and managing others
- managing stress, time, and energy
- promoting a learning and safety culture
- upholding healthy workplace standards
- using skilled communication in high-stake situations
Technical Skills
Technical skills in nursing refer to the practical abilities and competencies that nurses use in the delivery of patient care. These skills are typically learned through education, training, and hands-on experience. Some common technical skills in nursing include:
- administering medications
- assisting with personal hygiene and activities of daily living
- documentation and charting
- inserting intravenous catheters
- inserting urinary catheters and nasogastric tubes
- performing tracheostomy care
- performing wound care
- taking vital signs
This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.
Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution License and you must attribute OpenStax.
Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/clinical-nursing-skills/pages/1-introduction
- Authors: Christy Bowen
- Publisher/website: OpenStax
- Book title: Clinical Nursing Skills
- Publication date: Jun 26, 2024
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Book URL: https://openstax.org/books/clinical-nursing-skills/pages/1-introduction
- Section URL: https://openstax.org/books/clinical-nursing-skills/pages/28-2-developing-critical-thinking-skills
© Jun 25, 2024 OpenStax. Textbook content produced by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License . The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.
Account Management
Log in to manage your policy, generate a certificate of insurance (COI), make a payment, and more.
Log in to your account to update your information or manage your policy.
Download a Certificate of Insurance (COI) to provide to your employer.
Make a Payment
Make a one-time payment, set up autopay, or update your payment information.
Submit a notice of an incident or claim in just minutes.
Topics on this page:
Why Critical Thinking in Nursing Is Important
8 examples of critical thinking in nursing, improving the quality of patient care, the importance of critical thinking in nursing.
Jul 24, 2024
![building critical thinking skills in nursing critical thinking in nursing](https://www.berxi.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/copper-statue-man-thinking.jpg?w=800)
While not every decision is an immediate life-and-death situation, there are hundreds of decisions nurses must make every day that impact patient care in ways small and large.
“Being able to assess situations and make decisions can lead to life-or-death situations,” said nurse anesthetist Aisha Allen . “Critical thinking is a crucial and essential skill for nurses.”
The National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission (NLNAC) defines critical thinking in nursing this way: “the deliberate nonlinear process of collecting, interpreting, analyzing, drawing conclusions about, presenting, and evaluating information that is both factually and belief-based. This is demonstrated in nursing by clinical judgment, which includes ethical, diagnostic, and therapeutic dimensions and research.”
An eight-year study by Johns Hopkins reports that 10% of deaths in the U.S. are due to medical error — the third-highest cause of death in the country.
“Diagnostic errors, medical mistakes, and the absence of safety nets could result in someone’s death,” wrote Dr. Martin Makary , professor of surgery at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Everyone makes mistakes — even doctors. Nurses applying critical thinking skills can help reduce errors.
“Question everything,” said pediatric nurse practitioner Ersilia Pompilio RN, MSN, PNP . “Especially doctor’s orders.” Nurses often spend more time with patients than doctors and may notice slight changes in conditions that may not be obvious. Resolving these observations with treatment plans can help lead to better care.
Key Nursing Critical Thinking Skills
Some of the most important critical thinking skills nurses use daily include interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation.
- Interpretation: Understanding the meaning of information or events.
- Analysis: Investigating a course of action based on objective and subjective data.
- Evaluation: Assessing the value of information and its credibility.
- Inference: Making logical deductions about the impact of care decisions.
- Explanation: Translating complicated and often complex medical information to patients and families in a way they can understand to make decisions about patient care.
- Self-Regulation: Avoiding the impact of unconscious bias with cognitive awareness.
These skills are used in conjunction with clinical reasoning. Based on training and experience, nurses use these skills and then have to make decisions affecting care.
It’s the ultimate test of a nurse’s ability to gather reliable data and solve complex problems. However, critical thinking goes beyond just solving problems. Critical thinking incorporates questioning and critiquing solutions to find the most effective one. For example, treating immediate symptoms may temporarily solve a problem, but determining the underlying cause of the symptoms is the key to effective long-term health.
Here are some real-life examples of how nurses apply critical thinking on the job every day, as told by nurses themselves.
Example #1: Patient Assessments
“Doing a thorough assessment on your patient can help you detect that something is wrong, even if you’re not quite sure what it is,” said Shantay Carter , registered nurse and co-founder of Women of Integrity . “When you notice the change, you have to use your critical thinking skills to decide what’s the next step. Critical thinking allows you to provide the best and safest care possible.”
Example #2: First Line of Defense
Often, nurses are the first line of defense for patients.
“One example would be a patient that had an accelerated heart rate,” said nurse educator and adult critical care nurse Dr. Jenna Liphart Rhoads . “As a nurse, it was my job to investigate the cause of the heart rate and implement nursing actions to help decrease the heart rate prior to calling the primary care provider.”
Nurses with poor critical thinking skills may fail to detect a patient in stress or deteriorating condition. This can result in what’s called a “ failure to rescue ,” or FTR, which can lead to adverse conditions following a complication that leads to mortality.
Example #3: Patient Interactions
Nurses are the ones taking initial reports or discussing care with patients.
“We maintain relationships with patients between office visits,” said registered nurse, care coordinator, and ambulatory case manager Amelia Roberts . “So, when there is a concern, we are the first name that comes to mind (and get the call).”
“Several times, a parent called after the child had a high temperature, and the call came in after hours,” Roberts said. “Doing a nursing assessment over the phone is a special skill, yet based on the information gathered related to the child’s behavior (and) fluid intake, there were several recommendations I could make.”
Deciding whether it was OK to wait until the morning, page the primary care doctor, or go to the emergency room to be evaluated takes critical thinking.
Example #4: Using Detective Skills
Nurses have to use acute listening skills to discern what patients are really telling them (or not telling them) and whether they are getting the whole story.
“I once had a 5-year-old patient who came in for asthma exacerbation on repeated occasions into my clinic,” said Pompilio. “The mother swore she was giving her child all her medications, but the asthma just kept getting worse.”
Pompilio asked the parent to keep a medication diary.
“It turned out that after a day or so of medication and alleviation in some symptoms, the mother thought the child was getting better and stopped all medications,” she said.
Example #5: Prioritizing
“Critical thinking is present in almost all aspects of nursing, even those that are not in direct action with the patient,” said Rhoads. “During report, nurses decide which patient to see first based on the information gathered, and from there they must prioritize their actions when in a patient’s room. Nurses must be able to scrutinize which medications can be taken together, and which modality would be best to help a patient move from the bed to the chair.”
A critical thinking skill in prioritization is cognitive stacking. Cognitive stacking helps create smooth workflow management to set priorities and help nurses manage their time. It helps establish routines for care while leaving room within schedules for the unplanned events that will inevitably occur. Even experienced nurses can struggle with juggling today’s significant workload, prioritizing responsibilities, and delegating appropriately.
Example #6: Medication & Care Coordination
Another aspect that often falls to nurses is care coordination. A nurse may be the first to notice that a patient is having an issue with medications.
“Based on a report of illness in a patient who has autoimmune challenges, we might recommend that a dose of medicine that interferes with immune response be held until we communicate with their specialty provider,” said Roberts.
Nurses applying critical skills can also help ease treatment concerns for patients.
“We might recommend a patient who gets infusions come in earlier in the day to get routine labs drawn before the infusion to minimize needle sticks and trauma,” Robert said.
Example #7: Critical Decisions
During the middle of an operation, the anesthesia breathing machine Allen was using malfunctioned.
“I had to critically think about whether or not I could fix this machine or abandon that mode of delivering nursing anesthesia care safely,” she said. “I chose to disconnect my patient from the malfunctioning machine and retrieve tools and medications to resume medication administration so that the surgery could go on.”
Nurses are also called on to do rapid assessments of patient conditions and make split-second decisions in the operating room.
“When blood pressure drops, it is my responsibility to decide which medication and how much medication will fix the issue,” Allen said. “I must work alongside the surgeons and the operating room team to determine the best plan of care for that patient’s surgery.”
“On some days, it seems like you are in the movie ‘The Matrix,’” said Pompilio. “There’s lots of chaos happening around you. Your patient might be decompensating. You have to literally stop time and take yourself out of the situation and make a decision.”
Example #8: Fast & Flexible Decisions
Allen said she thinks electronics are great, but she can remember a time when technology failed her.
“The hospital monitor that gives us vitals stopped correlating with real-time values,” she said. “So I had to rely on basic nursing skills to make sure my patient was safe. (Pulse check, visual assessments, etc.)”
In such cases, there may not be enough time to think through every possible outcome. Critical thinking combined with experience gives nurses the ability to think quickly and make the right decisions.
Nurses who think critically are in a position to significantly increase the quality of patient care and avoid adverse outcomes.
“Critical thinking allows you to ensure patient safety,” said Carter. “It’s essential to being a good nurse.”
Nurses must be able to recognize a change in a patient’s condition, conduct independent interventions, anticipate patients and provider needs, and prioritize. Such actions require critical thinking ability and advanced problem-solving skills.
“Nurses are the eyes and ears for patients, and critical thinking allows us to be their advocates,” said Allen.
Image courtesy of iStock.com/ davidf
Last updated on Jul 24, 2024. Originally published on Aug 25, 2021.
- Career Growth
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Berxi™ or Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company. This article (subject to change without notice) is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute professional advice. Click here to read our full disclaimer
The product descriptions provided here are only brief summaries and may be changed without notice. The full coverage terms and details, including limitations and exclusions, are contained in the insurance policy. If you have questions about coverage available under our plans, please review the policy or contact us at 833-242-3794 or [email protected] . “20% savings” is based on industry pricing averages.
Berxi™ is a part of Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance ( BHSI ). Insurance products are distributed through Berkshire Hathaway Global Insurance Services, California License # 0K09397. BHSI is part of Berkshire Hathaway’s National Indemnity group of insurance companies, consisting of National Indemnity and its affiliates, which hold financial strength ratings of A++ from AM Best and AA+ from Standard & Poor’s. The rating scales can be found at www.ambest.com and www.standardandpoors.com , respectively.
No warranty, guarantee, or representation, either expressed or implied, is made as to the correctness, accuracy, completeness, adequacy, or sufficiency of any representation or information. Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.
The information on this web site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment, and does not purport to establish a standard of care under any circumstances. All content, including text, graphics, images and information, contained on or available through this web site is for general information purposes only based upon the information available at the time of presentation, and does not constitute medical, legal, regulatory, compliance, financial, professional, or any other advice.
BHSI makes no representation and assumes no responsibility or liability for the accuracy of information contained on or available through this web site, and such information is subject to change without notice. You are encouraged to consider and confirm any information obtained from or through this web site with other sources, and review all information regarding any medical condition or treatment with your physician or medical care provider. NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING THAT YOU HAVE READ ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH THIS WEB SITE.
BHSI is not a medical organization, and does not recommend, endorse or make any representation about the efficacy, appropriateness or suitability of any specific tests, products, procedures, treatments, services, opinions, health care providers or other information contained on or available through this web site. BHSI IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY FOR, ANY ADVICE, COURSE OF TREATMENT, DIAGNOSIS OR ANY OTHER SERVICES OR PRODUCTS THAT YOU OBTAIN AFTER REVIEWING THIS WEB SITE.
Want Berxi articles delivered straight to your inbox? Sign up for our monthly newsletter below!
" * " indicates required fields
How we use your email address Berxi will not sell or rent your email address to third parties unless otherwise notified. Other than where necessary to administer your insurance policy or where required by law, Berxi will not disclose your email address to third parties. Your email address is required to identify you for access to the Berxi website. You may also receive newsletters, product updates, and communications about quotes and policies.
Paul Dughi is a contributing writer for Berxi, as well as a journalist and freelance writer. He has held executive management positions in the media industry for the past 25 years.
Related Articles
![building critical thinking skills in nursing A pair of latex gloved hands holding bare hands that hold a red heart](https://www.berxi.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Breaking_Bad_News_to_Patients_Header_Image.jpg?w=282&h=94&crop=1)
Breaking Bad News to Patients: A Nurse’s Guide to SPIKES
Michael Walton Jul 24, 2024
![building critical thinking skills in nursing sticky note showing delegation in nursing](https://www.berxi.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/sticky-note-infographic.jpg?w=282&h=94&crop=1)
Delegation in Nursing: Steps, Skills, & Solutions for Creating Balance at Work
Kristy Snyder Jul 24, 2024
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Stressed female nurse in PPE leans on bed and rubs forehead](https://www.berxi.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Common_Nursing_Mistakes_Header_Image.jpg?w=282&h=94&crop=1)
The 7 Most Common Nursing Mistakes (And What You Can Do If You Make One)
Paul Dughi Jul 24, 2024
- Visit Nurse.com on Facebook
- Visit Nurse.com on YouTube
- Visit Nurse.com on Instagram
- Visit Nurse.com on LinkedIn
Nurse.com by Relias . © Relias LLC 2024. All Rights Reserved.
- Practice Test
- Fundamentals of Nursing
- Anatomy and Physiology
- Medical and Surgical Nursing
- Perioperative Nursing
- Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing
- Maternal & Child Nursing
- Community Health Nursing
- Pathophysiology
- Nursing Research
- Study Guide and Strategies
- Nursing Videos
- Work for Us!
- Privacy Policy
![Rnspeakcom Rnspeakcom your ultimate guide in nursing](https://www.rnspeak.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Rnspeak-mobile-logo-2020-update.png)
- Journals and Essays
Thinking Like a Nurse: The Critical Thinking Skills in the Nursing Practice
![critical thinking in nursing critical thinking in nursing](https://rnspeak.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/male-and-female-nurse-having-discussion-over-clipb-.jpg)
Thinking how to nurse is thinking like a nurse. Florence Nightingale (1860) wrote on her notes that women who have charge of the other’s health—to which the application of her integrated experiences must teach herself to think how to nurse, a self-learning acquired from “hints”.
Perhaps, Nightingale referred “hints” as the use of critical thinking skills in patient’s care. The ability to think critically was the foundation of nursing practice started from historic times and is becoming one of the key performance indicators for both students and nursing professionals nowadays.
Educational system continues to evolve and progresses heeding to the needs of the society, and parallel to the changing educational structure and methodology. However, Haber (2020) reported that only 75% of employers claim that the students they hire who underwent 12 or more years of formal education lack of critical thinking and problem-solving abilities despite the progress in the educational system.
What is Critical Thinking?
Critical thinking skills, a fundamental skill that plays a pivotal role in our daily survival. In general terms, the skill will not stop in memorization, the process goes beyond connecting the dots from one to concept to another, problem-solving techniques, think creatively, and apply the learned knowledge in new ways (Walden University, 2020). Kaminske (2019), defines critical thinking skills as a domain-specific skill on the ability to solve problems and make effective decisions that require expertise to be applied in a range of situations and scenarios.
In the nursing practice, Critical thinking skill works in assimilation with critical reasoning as a practice-based discipline of decision-making to the health care professionals. Critical thinking is the process of the intentional higher level of thinking to identify patient’s health care needs and appraise evidence-based practice to make choices in the delivery of care.
![Thinking Like a Nurse: The Critical Thinking Skills in the Nursing Practice 1 decision making](https://rnspeak.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/decision-making-.jpg)
On the other hand, clinical reasoning as integrated to clinical thinking in application to clinical situation works as a cognitive process to utilized thinking strategies to gather and critically analyze the data concerning the health care needs of the patient, organized the information according to its prioritization, and formulate efficient nursing care plans to improve patient’s outcomes (Berman, et al., 2016).
“Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action”, a precise definition presented by Michael Scriven and Richard Paul at the Eighth Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking and Education Reform during the summer of 1987 (Lakhanigam, 2017).
Lakhanigam added the definition published by the Journal of Nursing Education in 2010 that describes critical thinking as the process involving interpretation and analysis of the problem, reasoning to find a solution, applying, and finally evaluation of the outcomes”. Regis College (2020), emphasized the use of deductive reasoning in observation, analyzing information, formulate conclusions, and performing appropriate actions in a self-directed process .
Theories on the Physiology of Thinking
From the ancient theory of “tabula rasa”, as describes in Wikipedia (2020) that humans are born without built-in mental content, and all knowledge is collected by the brain from experiences and perceptions. In this computer age, a neurologist discovered neurological pathways on how to re-program or reformat our brains like computers by analyzing how the brain appears to process, recognize, remember and transfer information at the level of neural circuits, synapses and neurotransmitters. Willis (2012) discussed the brain’s neuroplastic response to stimulation called neuroplasticity. The information is processed in the reflective and cognitive functions of prefrontal cortex wherein learning incorporated into networks of longterm conceptual memory.
Neuroplasticity is greatly affected by stress, boredom and frustration as seen in the neuroimaging scans of students showed that active metabolic states block the processing in the prefrontal cortex. In response to stress, the amygdala as the switching station became hyperactive resulting to switches of input and output away from the prefrontal cortex down to the control of the lower reactive brain, this response is called fight/flight/freeze (act out/zone out). In this situation, the lower brain’s reactive behaviours are in control. This will result in the loss of information access to the prefrontal cortex and new learning is not retained.
Elseways, Knowles (1984) four principles of andragogy of adult learning included (a.) experiences from mistakes that provide the basis for the learning activities; and (b.) the importance of problems and crisis, as adult learning is problem-centred rather than content-oriented; as well as (c.) involvement in the planning and evaluation of learning; and lastly, (d.) that adults are most interested in a subject that is relevant to their job and personal life.
Learning and thinking as applied in a higher-level context, Ausubel’s assimilation theory may recount the theories on critical thinking. In this theory, Ausubel claimed that learning occurs as a result of the interaction between the acquired learning and the cognitive structure in application to practice (Seel, 2012). Moreover, critical analysis and differentiation of interrelationships between concepts called concept mapping refines the knowledge into a more organized, precise, specific, and integrated learning.
In different circumstances, nursing as a professional working in a toxic environment of the sick, pained, hopeless, weak, and dying patients; bullying, queen bee syndrome, and seniority egoism of colleagues; and backbreaking workloads—have reported cases of work-related boredom and stress. The application of the three theories may improve mentoring-learning strategies in meaningful nursing education and training.
Theories on learning acquisition from the collection of information, physiologic processing on cognitive-reflective functions of the brain, concept mapping, and internal/external utilization of knowledge in application to critical thinking are the frameworks of a skilled critical thinker.
Characteristics of a Skilled Critical-Thinker
Health care system can go a long way, achieving a considerable success having employees that possess the ability to think critically thus decreasing errors in clinical judgments. For this purpose, every nurse is required to obtain the characteristics of an excellent skilled critical thinker.
The study of Scheffer and Rubenfeld revealed the common qualities among internationally diverse expert nurses from nine different countries supporting the idea of critical thinking in nursing that encompasses logic and reasoning (Berman, et. Al., 2016), and that includes:
11 Affective Components of a Skilled Critical-Thinker Nurse:
- Perseverance
- Open-mindedness
- Flexibility
- Inquisitiveness
- Intellectual integrity
- Perspective
7 Cognitive Skills of a Skilled Critical-Thinker Nurse:
- Information seeking
- Discriminating
- Transforming knowledge
- Applying standards
- Logical reasoning
Critical Thinking Beyond Exigency and Expediency
Undeniably, nurses with critical thinking ability diversified with effective problem-solving and efficient decision-making skills are the most in-demand and highly valued in the field of the health care industry and academe.
As a nurse striding in the most complicated, stressful and multi-tasking job, you are responsible for making life-changing decisions under the pressure of time and emotions. These reasons as to why critical thinking skills in nursing practice plays a vital role in the care of the patient. Luna (2020), cited seven importance of critical thinking skills in the practice of nursing, such as:
- Nurses’ Critical Thinking Heavily Impacts Patient Care
- It’s Vital to Recognizing Shifts in Patient Status
- It’s Integral to an Honest and Open Exchange of Ideas
- It Allows You to Ensure Patient Safety
- It Helps Nurses Find Quick Fixes and Troubleshooting
- Critical Thinking can Lead to Innovative Improvements
- It Plays a Role in Rational Decision Making
Critical thinking skill is needed in problems identification and implementation of interventions resulting in improved patients outcomes, as well as development in nursing practice by providing new insights on the learned knowledge. Feedback and reflections provide interconnections between nursing research , critical thinking and the nursing practice (Berman, et. Al., 2016).
Critical Thinking Skills: The Mastery, Update and Upgrade
Critical thinking skill is an ability beyond thinking rationally and clearly. It is a process of thinking independently and working at your own feet in formulating own opinions or new theory by utilizing critical analysis on the interrelationship of two or more ideas and delineating conclusions without external control (Wabisabi Learning, 2020).
Modified Wabisabi Learning’s 12 Solid Strategies for Teaching Critical Thinking Skills, and its Application to Nursing Education, Training and Practice:
1. Practice on Eloquence in Question and Answer (Solution Fluency)
Mastery requires ample amount of practice to become highly skilled in critical thinking. Accustom to deliberate open discussions encouraging brainstorming on issues affecting the practice and daily living by using explicit open-ended questions and comprehensive instructions for problem-solving may provide opportunities to apply knowledge into practice as well as encouraging the transfer of ideas between domains (Haber, 2020). Brainstorming is an excellent learning tool to exercise critical thinking (Walden University, 2020) particularly if applied in a situational crisis or a hospital scenario.
2. Create a Foundation
From the theory of back to basic, mastery of low-level skills is a requirement in preparatory to the application of critical thinking skills (Kaminske, 2019).
Learning experiences from theoretical and experiential knowledge are good foundations to start critical thinking. Moreover, practicing thinking skills obtained from theoretical and experiential undertakings improve intellectual ability (Berman, et. al., 2016). Practical understanding and specialization on a particular focus may excel you more in thinking critically. The competence and skills acquired from clinical experience are the most essential learning in developing clinical judgment.
3. Consult the Classics
Nursing theorists and their work are the best examples of consulting the classics. In critical thinking, nurses identify claims based on facts, conclusions, judgment/opinions and evidence-based practice. Exploring nursing theorists and their works are like exploring great minds, acquiring lessons on character motivation, refuting theories or formulating a new theory from existing theory. Case studies and in-depth objective critiques of nursing theories may not only promote critical thinking but act as a leverage to bridge the gap between theory and practice.
4. Create an Environment for Open Communication
During clinical rounds, nurses and/or students with a clinical instructor are engaged into thinking process by providing the opportunity to communicate assessment data, collaborate ideas, formulate nursing care plan, and discuss the various context of the situation from different perspectives (Di Vito-Thomas, 2005).
5. Use Information Fluency
Information fluency is mastering the proper use of information and to the ability to intuitively analyze and interpret it in unearthing knowledge and appropriate facts useful in solving a problem (Wabisabi Learning, 2020).
Knowledge of medical conditions, procedures and its connections to patient’s care are important in building critical thinking. Learning from available resources like medical journals, surfing the internet, and meaningful dialogue with colleagues can increase your medical know-how (Jillings, 2020).
6. Utilize Peer Groups
Peer groups, particularly well experienced and highly skilled colleagues are an excellent source of information, questions, and problem-solving techniques as it expands thinking and viewpoints. It also develops interpersonal skills like teamwork and resolving conflicts (Berman, et. Al., 2016).
7. Try One Sentence of Reflections at a time
Reflections will teach the learner to apply their knowledge, logic and reasoning by explaining themselves in a low-pressure setting. It provides an opportunity to explore situations with a different approach and better solutions for future use (Jillings, 2020).
The mastery of metacognition helps the learner to use reflection in defining clinical experiences and explore ways on how to improve it. Recollecting facts and events in patient’s care may integrate the learner into different concepts by connecting different ideas from one another (Di Vito-Thomas, 2005).
8. Problem-solving with Reasoning
Understanding rationale, the sets of reasons or logical basis for a course of action assist the learners to gain a broad knowledge of the topic and promotes a higher level of understanding. Problem-solving guided by rationale is a technique to the use of deductive and inductive reasoning in the thinking process (Di Vito-Thomas, 2005).
9. Roleplaying and Return Demonstration
Role-playing is a self-directed activity that encourages analytic and creative thinking. It helps the learner to internalize empathy while compromising in portraying a role or another persona creating a wider chance for memory retention.
Practice and repetition of observed procedures during return demonstration creates an avenue for re-thinking ways on how to do a task properly with ease in your own phase as you implement it by yourself.
10. Thinking and Speaking With Sketch (Concept Mapping)
Incorporating a concept with multiple perspectives and connecting complex ideas in a structured way to search for potential solutions. These processes create an abstract concept that encourages logical arguments used in critical thinking (Kaminske, 2019).
Interactive activities such as case study with a panel discussion, observing clinical dynamics during in-depth arguments, making a multidisciplinary joint care plan for patient promotes an environment for critical thinking thus facilitating the development of clinical judgment (Di Vito-Thomas, 2005).
11. Do Some Prioritizing and Decision-making
Make critical thinking as a culture and not just an activity by encouraging decision-making. Prioritizing through analyzing information, applying knowledge, and evaluating a prospected solution are the cornerstones of decision-making. This will allows the learner to apply learned theories to a different scenario by weighing the advantages and disadvantages of different solutions and option in deciding best practices.
12. Correct Misconceptions and Personal Bias
Personal beliefs greatly influence one’s ability to think critically as people always seek out ideas that conform to their own beliefs (Kaminske (2019). Several factors that act as the pitfalls in critical thinking are misconceptions, personal bias, and assumptions—which can bring a learner into a wrong direction. A discussion with colleagues who have mastery in evidence-based practice and conducting more in-depth investigations can give ideas and extends point of view (Jillings, 2020).
Conclusion and Suggestions:
Analytical skills through keen observation, understanding important data, and identifying a pattern of recognition; problem-solving capacity by connecting relationship of phenomena, data interpretation guided by significance and rationale; and use of reflection and evaluation abilities in formulating conclusion are the important factors in clinical judgment and decision-making.
Critical thinking is a learned skill resulted from a rolled-up innate curiosity in the application of strong theoretical and experiential foundations in solving clinical problems that direct to the best care decision, which produce positive patient outcomes and improve patient care services.
In this era of technological advancement where machine replaces almost of everything, critical thinking still plays an important role in the nursing practice. Nurses who can manipulate complex clinical situations with efficient skills on critical/analytical thinking, problem-solving and decision-making are often in the front line to compete for the position with greater autonomy and higher chances for opportunities.
- Nightingale, F. (1860). Notes on Nursing: What it Is, and what it is Not. London: Harrisons & Sons.
- Haber, J. (2020). It’s Time to Get Serious About Teaching Critical Thinking. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved on 24 October 2020 from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2020/03/02/teaching-students-think-critically-opinion
- Walden University. (2020). 7 Ways to Teach Critical Thinking in Elementary Education. Retrieved on 24 October 2020 from https://www.waldenu.edu/online-bachelors-programs/bs-in-elementary-education/resource/seven-ways-to-teach-critical-thinking-in-elementary-education
- Kaminske, A.N. (2019). Can We Teach Critical Thinking?. The Learning Scientists. Retrieved on 24 October 2020 from https://www.learningscientists.org/blog/2019/2/28/can-we-teach-critical-thinking#:~:text=beliefs%20(3).-,Can%20we%20teach%20critical%20thinking%3F,happens%20to%20enjoy%20science%20fiction
- Berman, A., Snyder, S.J. & Frandsen, G. (2016). Kozier & Erb’s Fundamentals of Nursing: Concepts, Process, and Practice, 10 th New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
- Lakhanigam, S. (2017). Critical Thinking: A Vital Trait for Nurses. Minority Nurse. Retrieved on 24 October 2020 from https://minoritynurse.com/critical-thinking-vital-trait-nurses/
- Regis College (2020). How to Leverage Critical Thinking in Nursing Practice. Retrieved on 24 October 2020 from https://online.regiscollege.edu/blog/how-to-leverage-critical-thinking-in-nursing-practice/
- (2020). Tabula Rasa. Retrieved on 24 October 2020 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabula_rasa
- Willis, J. (2012). A Neurologist Makes the Case for Teaching Teachers About the Brain. George Lucas Educational Foundation. Retrieved on 24 October 2020 from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/neuroscience-higher-ed-judy-willis
- Knowles, M. (1984). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species, 3 rd Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
- Seel, N.M. (2012). Assimilation Theory of Learning. In: Seel N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_358
- Luna, A. (2020). 7 Reasons Critical Thinking In Nursing Is Important. AMN Healthcare Company. Retrieved on 24 October 2002 from https://www.onwardhealthcare.com/nursing-resources/seven-reasons-critical-thinking-in-nursing-is-important/
- Wabisabi Learning. (2020). 12 Solid Strategies for Teaching Critical Thinking Skills. Retrieved on 24 October 2020 from https://wabisabilearning.com/blogs/critical-thinking/teaching-critical-thinking-skills
- Di Vito-Thomas, P. (2005). Nursing Student Stories on Learning How to Think Like a Nurse. Nurse Educator, 30(3), pp. 133-136.
- Jillings, B. (2020). Critical Thinking in Nursing: Why It’s Important and How to Improve. AMN Healthcare Company. Retrieved on 24 October 2020 from https://www.americanmobile.com/mobile/NZArticle/?articleId=3346
RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR
Autism: a comprehensive guide to raising and supporting a child with autism, the most common types of eating disorder, 120+ fresh nursing essay topics (with faqs and essay writing tips), nursing personal statement: your voice in writing, the nursing essay: learning how to write, covid-19: the nursing case management approach, leave a reply cancel reply.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://cdn.wolterskluwer.io/wk-logos/1.0.x/favicon.png?rev=43)
- Subscribe to journal Subscribe
- Get new issue alerts Get alerts
Secondary Logo
Journal logo.
Colleague's E-mail is Invalid
Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.
Save my selection
Creative Ways to Enhance and Assess Critical Thinking in Nursing Students
Parker, Kimberly C.
About the Author Kimberly C. Parker, DNP, RN, is a clinical instructor, University of Alabama Capstone College of Nursing, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. For more information, contact her at [email protected] .
The author has declared no conflict of interest.
Nursing students should be challenged to implement critical thinking decisions regarding conclusions they implement for patient care. This article reinforces common techniques and introduces new practices to teach critical thinking. Many ways are currently recognized utilizing an assortment of techniques. The concepts from an escape room are a great way to deliver opportunities for students to practice this skill and can be provided economically and easily. Being creative in managing these concepts will offer an exciting chance to introduce critical thinking for your students.
Full Text Access for Subscribers:
Individual subscribers.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://journals.lww.com/_layouts/1033/IMAGES/OAKS.Journals/ovid-logo.png)
Institutional Users
Not a subscriber.
You can read the full text of this article if you:
- + Favorites
- View in Gallery
Readers Of this Article Also Read
Escape room: innovative teaching strategy to stimulate critical..., retention of nursing students: an integrative review, can you escape nursing school educational escape room in nursing education, learning clinical judgments with a lens of inclusivity, objectives and outcomes: the fundamental difference.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Health eCareers logo](https://media.healthecareers.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/15032450/healthecareers-logo.png)
opens in a new window
- Nurse Career
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Nurse looking intently at a computer](https://media.healthecareers.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/28184459/Shutterstock_1913661049.jpg.webp)
5 Ways To Improve Critical Thinking in Nursing
Being an outstanding nurse requires an abundance of acquired skills used to communicate with healthcare teams, patients, and their families. Critical thinking tops this list and is essential for problem-solving and decision-making. To be successful, administrative and clinical nursing leaders must have rock solid critical thinking skills. The same goes when advancing in the nursing world.
Critical thinking allows you to question belief systems, test previously held assumptions, and recognize uncertainty as verification. Experts describe it as a person’s ability to identify problems and biases and infer and draw conclusions. As a nurse, it’s important to determine the relevance of all the information you’ve gathered. A good way to approach critical thinking is to apply it to the fundamental steps of the nursing process while assessing, diagnosing, planning, implementing, and evaluating.
Since nurses are often at patients’ bedsides, they usually are the first to notice issues. Nursing requires you to make clinical decisions through the view of several lenses like evidence-based practice, fairness, and ethics. It’s thinking beyond completing assigned tasks to deliver the best care. Critical thinking helps you anticipate and understand changes in a patient’s conditions.
Here are five ways you can improve your critical thinking as a nurse.
Awareness is the First Step
Today’s healthcare is intricate and dynamic; as a result, nurses need to make complex decisions to deliver safe and beneficial care. Successful critical thinkers demonstrate the ability to recognize their own biases and learn to spot them when they arise.
Being aware is the first step—only then can one determine if a personal bias is instrumental in making the wrong conclusion.
This is especially important for new nurses to recognize as they are so often overwhelmed by the transition from textbook learning to clinical practice. Fear and ego also inhibit the development of critical thinking competence. They can stop you from questioning things that might benefit the patient in the long run. Ways to combat this would be to treat each patient interaction as part of a whole and to problem-solve with colleagues.
Take a Care-based Approach
Each patient brings their own set of symptoms and medical history, so no two patients are identical. Ask questions like what information is missing that can fill in a gap or how quickly you need to act. This is where working with a mentor can be extremely helpful. Their guidance through case studies helps you stay in a learning mode environment, gathering data and reaching conclusions together to help keep an eye out for when personal biases might appear.
Welcome New Habits
When challenging situations present themselves, seek out the truth by investigating.
Consciously work to suspend your judgment and try to be open-minded toward other views. This increases your ability to work as a team, focusing on the goals and interests of the patients, ultimately enhancing the organization as a whole. Clinicians who view their relationships with patients more as partnerships are more likely to see patients as being on the same “team” and collaborate towards a shared goal.
Another tactic is to take a moment at the end of each workday to think about what did and didn’t go well, not just for you, but for others on your team. Can you learn from their mistakes? Did you make a decision too soon? Should you have waited a little longer before acting? If you lived your day in reverse, what would you have done differently? What could have gone better? These are questions that are easy to lose sight of during a hectic day. Taking time to assess is not only good for growth but stress management, too.
Confront Personal Bias
Analyzing and reflecting on your thinking process can lead to seeing personal biases.
Extensive research shows us that unconscious biases lead to different treatment of patients by race, gender, age, weight, income, language, and insurance status. Skills that can lower biases involve perspective-taking, which can inhibit unconscious stereotypes and prejudices. When healthcare team members are empathetic, it positively affects patient satisfaction. Nurses must learn to separate their own biases from each patient to avoid making false assumptions that might impede the quality of care.
Create a Foolproof Process
As you are actively working to develop critical thinking skills, creating a list can be helpful. Then you can check off each step. Below is an example of points to consider:
- Are you asking enough questions? (Is there anything you don’t fully understand?)
- How much information have you gathered?
- Can you implement a strategy to remedy the situation?
- When you evaluate the results, do they seem clear?
- Have you considered another point of view?
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Female nurse taking blood pressure of older female patient](https://media.healthecareers.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/27131619/Shutterstock_1175874475.jpg)
Related Articles
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Female nurse taking blood pressure of older female patient](https://media.healthecareers.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/27131619/Shutterstock_1175874475.jpg)
How to Change Careers to Nursing
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Medical-surgical nurse in an operating room looking at chart](https://media.healthecareers.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/16125253/Shutterstock_558725626.jpg)
5 Things You Need to Know About Medical-Surgical Nurses
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Doctors and nursing smiling and talking with coffee](https://media.healthecareers.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/28005559/Shutterstock_2326829505.jpg)
The Essential Role of Mentoring in Nursing Professional Development
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/AmericanNurseJournalLogo.jpg)
Effective clinical learning for nursing students
Approaches that meet student and nurse needs..
- Direct care nurses serve as significant teachers and role models for nursing students in the clinical setting.
- Building critical thinking skills is one of the most important outcomes in the clinical setting for nursing students.
- Collaboration with nursing faculty during the clinical rotation can ease the burden on direct care nurses and facilitate a positive learning experience for the student.
The nursing profession continues to experience several challenges—some longstanding and exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The shortage of nurses at the bedside and reports of nurses planning to leave the profession soon place stress on the workforce and the healthcare system. The situation has put even more pressure on nursing schools to recruit and retain students who enter the workforce well-prepared for practice and capable of filling these vacancies. However, concerns exist surrounding students’ critical thinking skills and their readiness for a demanding career.
The challenge
A longstanding shortage of nursing school faculty and a reliance on new graduate nurses to serve as preceptors create challenges to properly preparing nursing students for a demanding role that requires excellent critical thinking skills.
What-Why-How? Improving Clinical Judgement
New nurses and clinical judgment
Nurse faculty shortage
Lack of interest and incentives lead to difficulty recruiting nurses from the bedside or practice to education. Many 4-year schools require a terminal degree to teach full-time in their undergraduate programs, but only 1% of nurses hold a PhD. In addition, according to the National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice (NACNEP), the average doctorally prepared nurse faculty member is in their 50s, which means they may soon retire. The surge in doctor of nursing practice programs has helped to bridge this gap, but attracting advanced practice nurses to academia from their more lucrative practice roles continues to prove difficult.
Concerns about the practice readiness of new graduate nurses have existed for several years. Missed clinical experiences and virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic heightened those concerns. The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) addressed the calls from nurse employers to make progress in this area by revamping the NCLEX-RN and NCLEX-PN exams to create Next Generation NCLEX (NGN), which includes more clinical judgment and critical thinking items. Nurse educators are working hard to prepare students for both practice and the new exam items by incorporating more active learning into classroom, clinical, and lab activities and emphasizing the importance of clinical judgment skills.
In most areas of the country, clinical student experiences have returned to pre-pandemic arrangements. State boards of nursing mandate maximum faculty-to-student ratios for clinical experiences. Schools can choose to have faculty supervise fewer students than the maximum, but faculty and clinical site shortages may eliminate that option. In many cases, preceptor-style experiences (such as capstone or practicum courses) have higher faculty-to-student ratios, and preceptors may have to meet specific criteria, such as a certain amount of experience.
Nursing faculty who facilitate on-site learning and supervise and teach students during their clinical experiences face several challenges. Some faculty supervise students across multiple units because unit size can’t accommodate 8 to 10 students at one time. Faculty may or may not have access to the organization’s electronic health records or other healthcare information technology, such as medication dispensing cabinets or glucometers.
In such instances, direct care nurses play an important role in the student’s experience at the clinical site. Their familiarity with the unit, the patient population, and the organization’s technology facilitates learning.
Direct care nurses
Allowing nursing students into the hospital can improve the patient care experience and potentially recruit students to work at the organization in the future. However, precepting a student or new employee creates an extra burden on an already overextended bedside nurse. NACNEP identifies several challenges for obtaining qualified preceptors, including lack of incentives and limited preparation in clinical teaching and learning strategies. Many hospitals have nursing students on the same unit several days a week to accommodate multiple area schools. This means that staff nurses are expected to teach students on most of their workdays during a typical school semester.
Unit nurse experience creates another barrier to effective precepting of nursing students. A study by Thayer and colleagues reported that the median length of experience for inpatient nurses working a 12-hour shift was less than 3 years at an organization. Without a better alternative, new graduate nurses frequently teach nursing students, although they may still be in what Benner describes as the advanced beginner stage of their career (still learning how to organize care, prioritize, and make clinical judgments). It’s difficult for someone who’s still learning and experiencing situations for the first time to teach complex concepts.
A guide to effective clinical site teaching
The following strategies promote critical thinking in students and collaboration with nurse faculty to ease direct care nurses’ teaching workload. Not every strategy is appropriate for all student clinical experiences. Consider them as multiple potential approaches to help facilitate meaningful learning opportunities.
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Set the tone
Nursing students frequently feel anxious about clinical experiences, especially if they’ve been told or perceive that they’re a burden or unwanted on the unit. When meeting the student for the first time, welcome them and communicate willingness to have them on the unit.
If you feel that you can’t take on a student for the day, speak to the nurse faculty member and charge nurse to explore other arrangements. Nurse faculty recognize that work or personal concerns may require you to decline precepting a student. Faculty members want to find the best situation for everyone. If the charge nurse or supervisor determines that the student still needs to work with you, talk to the nurse faculty about how they can help ease the burden and facilitate the student’s learning experience for the day.
Begin your time with the student by asking about their experience level and any objectives for the day. Understanding what the student can or can’t do will help you make the most out of the clinical experience. You’ll want to know the content they’re learning in class and connect them with a patient who brings those concepts to life. A student may have assignments to complete, but their focus should be on patient care. Help the student identify the busiest parts of the day and the best time to review the electronic health record and complete assignments.
If a situation requires your full attention and limits training opportunities, briefly explain to the student what will happen. If you have time, provide the student with tasks or specific objectives to note during the observation. Involve the nursing faculty member to help facilitate the learning experience and make it meaningful.
Be a professional role model
Students like to hear about the benefits and rewards of being a nurse, and about each nurse’s unique path. Students also enjoy learning about the “real world” from nurses, but keep in mind that they’re impressionable. Speaking negatively about the unit, patients, organization, or profession may discourage the student. If you must deviate from standard care, such as performing a skill differently than it’s traditionally taught in school, provide the rationale or hospital policy behind the decision.
Feel free to discuss the student’s nursing school experience but don’t diminish the value of their education or assigned work. Keep in mind that school assignments, such as nursing care plans or concept maps, aren’t taught for job training but to deliberately and systematically promote critical thinking. These assignments allow a student to reflect on how a patient’s pathophysiology and nursing assessment and interventions relate to one another.
Reinforce how concepts students learn in school provide valuable knowledge in various settings. For example, if the student is on a medical-surgical unit but says that they want to work in obstetrics, engage the student by pointing out links between the two areas, such as managing diabetes and coagulation disorders. Provide encouragement and excitement about the student’s interest in joining the profession at a time of great need.
Build assessment skills
Explain to students your approach to performing assessments and organizing patient care. Most students learn comprehensive head-to-toe assessments but, in the clinical setting, need to focus on the most relevant assessments. To promote critical thinking, ask the student what data they should focus on gathering based on the patient’s condition. Many students focus on the psychomotor aspect of assessment (performing the assessment correctly); ask them about the subjective data they should gather.
Allow the student to perform an assessment and then compare findings. For example, a student may know that a patient’s lung sounds are abnormal but not remember what the sound is called or what it means. Provide them with the correct terminology to help connect the dots. Discuss with the student when reassessments are warranted. If appropriate, allow a student to reassess the patient (vital signs, output, pain, other physical findings) and then confirm their findings and discuss what any changes mean for the clinical situation. If you don’t have time for these types of discussions following a student’s patient assessment, ask nursing faculty to observe and discuss findings with the student.
Discuss care management
Take advantage of opportunities to discuss concepts such as prioritization, advocacy, delegation, collaboration, discharge planning, and other ways in which the nurse acts as a care manager. Pointing out what’s appropriate to delegate to unlicensed assistive personnel or a licensed practical nurse will prove valuable and help reinforce concepts frequently covered on the NGN exam.
Promote critical thinking
The NCBSN has introduced the Clinical Judgment Measurement Model (CJMM) as a framework for evaluating the NGN exam, which incorporates unfolding case studies that systematically address six steps: recognize cues, analyze cues, generate hypotheses, generate solutions, take action, and evaluate outcomes. Each candidate encounters three case studies, with six questions, one for each step of the CJMM. Nursing faculty incorporate this framework and language into the nursing curriculum to help students think systematically and critically and prepare them for the exam.
Nurses with practice experience use this type of framework to gather information, make judgments, and take action. As a nurse approaches Benner’s competent stage of nursing practice, this type of thinking becomes intuitive, and nurses may not even be aware of the conclusions they draw and decisions they make based on their clinical judgment skills. To help students understand why something is happening, they should continue to work through a process like this deliberately. For example, many students view medication administration as a simple task and may say in post-conference discussion, “All I did was give meds.” You perform many assessments and make various judgments while administering medications, but you may not think to discuss them with students. Asking questions of students while they’re performing what may seem like repetitive tasks can help prompt critical thinking. (See Critical questions .)
Critical questions
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/clinical-asset2-910x1024.png)
Enhance self-efficacy
Many nurses believe that the student must follow them to every patient. This can be overwhelming for the direct care nurse and a barrier to agreeing to work with students. Other approaches can better facilitate learning. Most students will complete an assignment focused on one or two patients. Encourage the student to spend time alone with those patients to perform a more comprehensive history and assessment, help patients with basic care, and provide education. Select a patient who might enjoy the extra attention to ensure a mutually beneficial experience.
Also, consider asking the student to find information using available resources. Such inquiry can benefit you and the student. For example, prompt a student to answer one or more critical thinking questions using their textbooks or resources available on the hospital’s intranet. If time prevents you from explaining complex topics or helping the student problem-solve, ask the student to take the information they find to their faculty member to review. Nurse faculty won’t be familiar with the specific details of all patients on the unit, so identify the most appropriate questions for the student to consider to help the nurse faculty facilitate learning.
Allowing the student time to find answers themselves builds self-efficacy and confidence and also relieves some of the stress and anxiety associated with being asked questions on the spot. This strategy also models the professional approach of using evidence-based resources to find information as needed in the clinical setting.
To ensure a positive learning experience and reduce anxiety, provide the student with ample time to prepare for performance-based skills. For example, identify an approximate time that medications will be administered to one patient and ask the student to independently look up the medication information by that time. This is more beneficial for the student than observing every patient’s medication administration or participating only in psychomotor tasks, such as scanning and giving injections. This also can free up your time by setting the expectation that the student will have the chance to prepare for and be directly involved in one medication pass.
Similarly, if an opportunity exists for practicing a psychomotor skill, such as inserting a urinary catheter or suctioning a tracheostomy, ask the student to review the procedure with their instructor using hospital policy and resources. If time doesn’t allow for a review, have the student observe to ensure provision of the best care and efficient use of time and resources.
Opportunities in education
Nurses who enjoy working with students or new staff members may want to consider academic roles. Many advanced nursing degrees, available in various formats, focus on education. For those who want to try teaching or have an interest in teaching only in the clinical setting, opportunities exist to work as adjunct faculty or to participate in hospital-based professional development activities. Adjunct faculty (part-time instructors) teach a variety of assignments and workloads, including in clinical, lab, or classroom settings. Many clinical adjunct faculty are nurses who also work in the organization with patients and may teach one group of students one day a week. Clinical and lab assignments vary from 4- or 6-hour experiences to 12-hour shifts.
According to NACNEP, most nursing programs require that adjunct faculty and clinical preceptors have the same or higher level of educational preparation as the program; for example, a nurse with a bachelor of science in nursing (BSN) may be able to teach clinicals for associate degree in nursing or BSN programs, depending on the state’s requirements and the school’s needs. Educational requirements to work in nursing programs vary by school. In some cases, adjunct faculty who don’t have a master’s degree may be supervised by full-time faculty with advanced degrees.
Benefits for adjunct faculty can include extra income, professional development, personal reward, tuition discounts or remissions, and giving back to the profession. Locate opportunities on nursing school websites or by talking to the nursing instructors or administrators in the local area.
Everyone benefits
Applying teaching approaches that benefit students and nurses can help ensure a positive clinical learning experience for everyone. When you graciously accept and teach students you help create positive encounters that enhance student critical thinking skill development, aid program retention, and support organizational recruitment.
Jennifer Miller is an assistant professor of nursing at the University of Louisville School of Nursing in Louisville, Kentucky .
American Nurse Journal. 2024; 19(4). Doi: 10.51256/ANJ042432
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Nursing faculty shortage fact sheet. October 2022. aacnnursing.org/news-information/fact-sheets/nursing-faculty-shortage
Benner P. From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice . Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1984.
National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice. Preparing nurse faculty, and addressing the shortage of nurse faculty and clinical preceptors. January 2021. hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/advisory-committees/nursing/reports/nacnep-17report-2021.pdf
National Council of State Boards of Nursing. Clinical Judgment Measurement Model. 2023. nclex.com/clinical-judgment-measurement-model.page
Thayer J, Zillmer J, Sandberg N, Miller AR, Nagel P, MacGibbon A. ‘The new nurse’ is the new normal. June 2, 2022. Epic Research. epicresearch.org/articles/the-new-nurse-is-the-new-normal
Key words: nursing students, nursing education, critical thinking, precepting
Let Us Know What You Think
1 comment . leave new.
All nursing programs need to put in more clinical time. Students do not get the time in clinicals so they do not have the opportunities to develop their clinical judgement and thinking skills. Clinical time is what glues concept and theory together if they don’t get the clinical time they are less likely to develop these skills which contributes to errors, burnout and nurses leaving the field.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
![building critical thinking skills in nursing building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/subscribe-to-our-newsletter-NEW-NL.png)
NurseLine Newsletter
- First Name *
- Last Name *
- Hidden Referrer
*By submitting your e-mail, you are opting in to receiving information from Healthcom Media and Affiliates. The details, including your email address/mobile number, may be used to keep you informed about future products and services.
Test Your Knowledge
Recent posts.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/shutterstock_716837404-200x189.jpg)
Hypnosis and pain
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/636841049-955x537-nursing-world-2-200x112.jpg)
Measuring nurses’ health
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Nurse deciding about retirement](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/shutterstock_1824965774-200x133.jpg)
From Retirement to Preferment: Crafting Your Next Chapter
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/shutterstock_2473319333-200x113.png)
Leadership in changing times
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/shutterstock_2409525573-200x137.jpg)
Valuing nursing
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/shutterstock_2254229959-200x119.jpg)
Promoting health literacy
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/shutterstock_2182287797-1-200x133.jpg)
Mentorship: A strategy for nursing retention
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Anatomy of Writing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Screen-Shot-2024-07-09-at-11.49.57-AM-153x200.png)
Anatomy of Writing for Publication for Nurses: The writing guide you’ve been looking for
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/713111083-STILL-SHOT-200x105.png)
Nurse leadership: Pitfalls and solutions
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ai-in-nursing-200x133.png)
It’s time embrace AI in nursing
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/ltc-200x121.png)
CMS establishes minimum LTC staffing standards
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/shutterstock_1896453919-200x133.jpg)
Mental health matters
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/shutterstock_1933615763-200x133.jpg)
Connecting the dots with cannabis care
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/shutterstock_1207458589-200x133.jpg)
Wellness challenges
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/writing-retreat_photo2-rotated-e1719930370490-200x150.jpeg)
Writing retreats for nurses: Inspiration to share
Miller J. Effective clinical learning for nursing students. American Nurse Journal. 2024;19(4):32-37. doi:10.51256/anj042432 https://www.myamericannurse.com/effective-clinical-learning-for-nursing-students/
We use cookies on our website to support technical features that enhance your user experience, and to help us improve our website. By continuing to use this website, you accept our privacy policy .
- Student Login
- Call Us: 888-549-6755
- 888-559-6763
- Search site Search our site Search Now Close
- Request Info
Skip to Content (Press Enter)
Why Critical Thinking Skills in Nursing Matter (And What You Can Do to Develop Them)
By Hannah Meinke on 07/05/2021
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Critical Thinking in Nursing](https://www.rasmussen.edu/images/rasmussenlibraries/blogs/school-of-nursing/criticalthinkingnursing_banner.jpg?sfvrsn=939db689_1)
The nursing profession tends to attract those who have natural nurturing abilities, a desire to help others, and a knack for science or anatomy. But there is another important skill that successful nurses share, and it's often overlooked: the ability to think critically.
Identifying a problem, determining the best solution and choosing the most effective method to solve the program are all parts of the critical thinking process. After executing the plan, critical thinkers reflect on the situation to figure out if it was effective and if it could have been done better. As you can see, critical thinking is a transferable skill that can be leveraged in several facets of your life.
But why is it so important for nurses to use? We spoke with several experts to learn why critical thinking skills in nursing are so crucial to the field, the patients and the success of a nurse. Keep reading to learn why and to see how you can improve this skill.
Why are critical thinking skills in nursing important?
You learn all sorts of practical skills in nursing school, like flawlessly dressing a wound, taking vitals like a pro or starting an IV without flinching. But without the ability to think clearly and make rational decisions, those skills alone won’t get you very far—you need to think critically as well.
“Nurses are faced with decision-making situations in patient care, and each decision they make impacts patient outcomes. Nursing critical thinking skills drive the decision-making process and impact the quality of care provided,” says Georgia Vest, DNP, RN and senior dean of nursing at the Rasmussen University School of Nursing.
For example, nurses often have to make triage decisions in the emergency room. With an overflow of patients and limited staff, they must evaluate which patients should be treated first. While they rely on their training to measure vital signs and level of consciousness, they must use critical thinking to analyze the consequences of delaying treatment in each case.
No matter which department they work in, nurses use critical thinking in their everyday routines. When you’re faced with decisions that could ultimately mean life or death, the ability to analyze a situation and come to a solution separates the good nurses from the great ones.
How are critical thinking skills acquired in nursing school?
Nursing school offers a multitude of material to master and upholds high expectations for your performance. But in order to learn in a way that will actually equip you to become an excellent nurse, you have to go beyond just memorizing terms. You need to apply an analytical mindset to understanding course material.
One way for students to begin implementing critical thinking is by applying the nursing process to their line of thought, according to Vest. The process includes five steps: assessment, diagnosis, outcomes/planning, implementation and evaluation.
“One of the fundamental principles for developing critical thinking is the nursing process,” Vest says. “It needs to be a lived experience in the learning environment.”
Nursing students often find that there are multiple correct solutions to a problem. The key to nursing is to select the “the most correct” solution—one that will be the most efficient and best fit for that particular situation. Using the nursing process, students can narrow down their options to select the best one.
When answering questions in class or on exams, challenge yourself to go beyond simply selecting an answer. Start to think about why that answer is correct and what the possible consequences might be. Simply memorizing the material won’t translate well into a real-life nursing setting.
How can you develop your critical thinking skills as a nurse?
As you know, learning doesn’t stop with graduation from nursing school. Good nurses continue to soak up knowledge and continually improve throughout their careers. Likewise, they can continue to build their critical thinking skills in the workplace with each shift.
“To improve your critical thinking, pick the brains of the experienced nurses around you to help you get the mindset,” suggests Eileen Sollars, RN ADN, AAS. Understanding how a seasoned nurse came to a conclusion will provide you with insights you may not have considered and help you develop your own approach.
The chain of command can also help nurses develop critical thinking skills in the workplace.
“Another aid in the development of critical thinking I cannot stress enough is the utilization of the chain of command,” Vest says. “In the chain of command, the nurse always reports up to the nurse manager and down to the patient care aide. Peers and fellow healthcare professionals are not in the chain of command. Clear understanding and proper utilization of the chain of command is essential in the workplace.”
How are critical thinking skills applied in nursing?
“Nurses use critical thinking in every single shift,” Sollars says. “Critical thinking in nursing is a paramount skill necessary in the care of your patients. Nowadays there is more emphasis on machines and technical aspects of nursing, but critical thinking plays an important role. You need it to understand and anticipate changes in your patient's condition.”
As a nurse, you will inevitably encounter a situation in which there are multiple solutions or treatments, and you'll be tasked with determining the solution that will provide the best possible outcome for your patient. You must be able to quickly and confidently assess situations and make the best care decision in each unique scenario. It is in situations like these that your critical thinking skills will direct your decision-making.
Do critical thinking skills matter more for nursing leadership and management positions?
While critical thinking skills are essential at every level of nursing, leadership and management positions require a new level of this ability.
When it comes to managing other nurses, working with hospital administration, and dealing with budgets, schedules or policies, critical thinking can make the difference between a smooth-running or struggling department. At the leadership level, nurses need to see the big picture and understand how each part works together.
A nurse manager , for example, might have to deal with being short-staffed. This could require coaching nurses on how to prioritize their workload, organize their tasks and rely on strategies to keep from burning out. A lead nurse with strong critical thinking skills knows how to fully understand the problem and all its implications.
- How will patient care be affected by having fewer staff?
- What kind of strain will be on the nurses?
Their solutions will take into account all their resources and possible roadblocks.
- What work can be delegated to nursing aids?
- Are there any nurses willing to come in on their day off?
- Are nurses from other departments available to provide coverage?
They’ll weigh the pros and cons of each solution and choose those with the greatest potential.
- Will calling in an off-duty nurse contribute to burnout?
- Was this situation a one-off occurrence or something that could require an additional hire in the long term?
Finally, they will look back on the issue and evaluate what worked and what didn’t. With critical thinking skills like this, a lead nurse can affect their entire staff, patient population and department for the better.
Beyond thinking
You’re now well aware of the importance of critical thinking skills in nursing. Even if you already use critical thinking skills every day, you can still work toward strengthening that skill. The more you practice it, the better you will become and the more naturally it will come to you.
If you’re interested in critical thinking because you’d like to move up in your current nursing job, consider how a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) could help you develop the necessary leadership skills.
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was originally published in July 2012. It has since been updated to include information relevant to 2021.
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
Request More Information
Talk with an admissions advisor today.
Fill out the form to receive information about:
- Program Details and Applying for Classes
- Financial Aid (for those who qualify)
- Customized Support Services
- Detailed Program Plans
There are some errors in the form. Please correct the errors and submit again.
Please enter your first name.
Please enter your last name.
There is an error in email. Make sure your answer has:
- An "@" symbol
- A suffix such as ".com", ".edu", etc.
There is an error in phone number. Make sure your answer has:
- 10 digits with no dashes or spaces
- No country code (e.g. "1" for USA)
There is an error in ZIP code. Make sure your answer has only 5 digits.
Please choose a School of study.
Please choose a program.
Please choose a degree.
The program you have selected is not available in your ZIP code. Please select another program or contact an Admissions Advisor (877.530.9600) for help.
The program you have selected requires a nursing license. Please select another program or contact an Admissions Advisor (877.530.9600) for help.
Rasmussen University is not enrolling students in your state at this time.
By selecting "Submit," I authorize Rasmussen University to contact me by email, phone or text message at the number provided. There is no obligation to enroll. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
About the author
Hannah Meinke
![building critical thinking skills in nursing hannah meinke headshot](https://www.rasmussen.edu/images/rasmussenlibraries/blogs/authors/Hannah-Meinke.jpg)
Posted in General Nursing
- nursing education
Related Content
![building critical thinking skills in nursing A male nurse adds his hand to a healthcare team group huddle](https://www.rasmussen.edu/images/rasmussenlibraries/blogs/school-of-nursing/2024/men-in-nursing-thumb.jpg)
Brianna Flavin | 05.07.2024
![building critical thinking skills in nursing A nurse with an ADN smiles in front of her clinic](https://www.rasmussen.edu/images/rasmussenlibraries/blogs/school-of-nursing/2024/what-can-you-do-with-an-adn-thumb.png)
Brianna Flavin | 03.19.2024
![building critical thinking skills in nursing A nurse walks confidently down a city street in spring](https://www.rasmussen.edu/images/rasmussenlibraries/blogs/school-of-nursing/2023/nursing-career-mobility-thumb.png)
Robbie Gould | 11.14.2023
![building critical thinking skills in nursing A critical care transport helicopter starts landing Get answers to all your questions about critical care transport nursing, from education requirements to certifications, salary, professional organizations and more. an evening sky](https://www.rasmussen.edu/images/rasmussenlibraries/blogs/school-of-nursing/2023/cctn-rescue-nurse-thumb.png)
Noelle Hartt | 11.09.2023
This piece of ad content was created by Rasmussen University to support its educational programs. Rasmussen University may not prepare students for all positions featured within this content. Please visit www.rasmussen.edu/degrees for a list of programs offered. External links provided on rasmussen.edu are for reference only. Rasmussen University does not guarantee, approve, control, or specifically endorse the information or products available on websites linked to, and is not endorsed by website owners, authors and/or organizations referenced. Rasmussen University is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission, an institutional accreditation agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- v.10(8); 2023 Aug
- PMC10333820
Curriculum framework to facilitate critical thinking skills of undergraduate nursing students: A cooperative inquiry approach
Christian makafui boso.
1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town South Africa
2 School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast Ghana
Anita S. van der Merwe
Janet gross.
3 Peace Corps Liberia, Mother Patern College of Health Sciences, Stella Maris Polytechnic, Monrovia Liberia
Associated Data
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Critical thinking (CT) is vital in assisting nurses to function efficiently in the ever‐changing health care environment. A CT‐based curriculum framework provides the impetus necessary to drive the acquisition of CT skills of students. Yet, there is no known CT‐based framework contextualized to developing countries where seniority tradition is a norm. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a CT‐based curriculum framework to facilitate the development of CT skills of nursing students in developing countries.
Cooperative inquiry.
Using purposive sampling, 11 participants comprising students, educators and preceptors developed a CT‐based curriculum framework.
Findings were organized into a framework illustrating interconnected concepts required to foster CT skills of nursing students. These concepts include authentic student–facilitator partnership, a facilitator that makes a difference; a learner that is free to question and encouraged to reflect; a conducive and participatory learning environment; curriculum renewal processes and contextual realities.
1. INTRODUCTION
Nurses in today's volatile and complex health care environment need to be able to critically appraise information when giving care (Dozier et al., 2021 ; Whiteman et al., 2021 ). Nursing regulatory bodies worldwide such as the Nursing and Midwifery Council of Ghana ( 2015 ) and the South African Nursing Council ( 2014 ) recognize critical thinking (CT) as crucial for nurses. These bodies require that nursing curricula promote CT skills of students (Dozier et al., 2021 ; Gholami et al., 2016 ). The rationale is that individuals with CT skills are potentially able to make good clinical judgements (Dozier et al., 2021 ; Gholami et al., 2016 ) which may lead to good patient outcomes (Ward‐Smith, 2020 ).
Critical thinking‐based curricula adopt learning outcomes, instructional methods and assessment approaches that are grounded on the principles of CT. Such CT‐based curricula create a participatory and democratic learning environment for students. Students will be empowered if they are allowed to take risks, encouraged to make inputs, permitted to share their opinions and if their mistakes are rectified with dignity (Raymond et al., 2017 ). Thus, as consistent with Billings & Halstead ( 2005 ) view, a curriculum should aim at enhancing active learning and the student–faculty interaction (as cited in Billings & Halstead, 2005 ). Learning environments where divergent views are suppressed (Raymond et al., 2017 ), and the educator is seen as the authority of information (Boso & Gross, 2015 ) do not promote CT in students.
A considerable number of reforms in higher education have stressed the need to facilitate CT skills of students (Butler, 2012 ). CT courses have been introduced in different academic disciplines such as nursing, law, sociology, psychology and philosophy. Despite the attention CT has received, there remains doubt whether graduates are being prepared to think critically (Butler, 2012 ). At the heart of this challenge is the fact that the concept of CT has not been incorporated into the teaching methods of many educators (Billings & Halstead, 2005 ). For example, educators construct questions that are mostly at the lower level of thinking (Amoako‐Sakyi & Amonoo‐Kuofi, 2015 ). This suggests that educational institutions may be failing in their quest to develop CT skills of students (Dunne, 2015 ).
In many developing countries, nursing schools encounter challenges that may further compound the challenge of assisting students to engage in CT skills. For example, in Ghana, challenges such as limited resources in nursing schools (Talley, 2006 ) have been reported. Specifically, a lack of qualified educators (Bell et al., 2013 ), infrastructural and logistical constraints (Talley, 2006 ), inappropriate instructional methods and large class sizes (Wilmot et al., 2013 ) are some of the challenges affecting nursing education. Also, as indicated in the authors' previous articles (Boso et al., 2020 , 2021c ), sociocultural norms uphold the seniority tradition. Traditionally, seniority is valued in most global societies. The aged are viewed as the source of knowledge, power and authority, thus seniority is a dominant cultural norm (Chen & Chung, 2002 ). For example, an individual is not expected to disagree or question an authority figure in public even if the authority figure appears to be wrong (Donkor & Andrews, 2011 ). The seniority tradition has been noted as a challenge to facilitating the CT skills of students (Chan, 2013 ; Raymond et al., 2017 ). Meanwhile, the complexity of fostering CT skills of students has often been underestimated leading to diverse conceptualizations of CT (Dwyer et al., 2014 ). Diverse conceptualizations could impede the development of CT skills of students.
Notwithstanding these challenges, a CT‐based curriculum framework could provide the needed impetus to foster the development of CT skills of students. A curriculum framework could provide ‘a means of conceptualizing and organizing the knowledge, skills, values, and beliefs critical to the delivery of a coherent curriculum that facilitates the achievement of the desired curriculum outcomes’ (Billings & Halstead, 2005 , p. 167). More importantly, a CT‐based framework provides a participatory and effective learning environment for both the learner and the educator (Dozier et al., 2021 ; Duron et al., 2006 ) even in societies where the seniority tradition is strongly adhered to. Yet, these authors could not identify a known curriculum framework to drive the facilitation of CT skills in the context of developing countries where the seniority tradition is a norm.
2. AIM OF THE STUDY
The aim of this study was to develop a CT‐based curriculum framework to facilitate the development of CT skills of nursing students in developing countries.
3. BACKGROUND
This study was underpinned by an eclectic model derived from Dwyer et al.'s ( 2014 ) and Duron et al.'s ( 2006 ) frameworks of CT development (see Figure 1 ). This eclectic model addressed four interconnected concepts relating to the exploration of experiences of students and educators towards CT skills facilitation namely CT, memory, comprehension (Dwyer et al., 2014 ) and instructional activities (Duron et al., 2006 ). These concepts are further explicated.
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is NOP2-10-5129-g001.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is NOP2-10-5129-g001.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333820/bin/NOP2-10-5129-g001.jpg)
Eclectic model of critical thinking development adopted from Duron et al.'s ( 2006 ) and Dwyer et al.'s ( 2014 ) models of CT. Permission to adapt was obtained.
3.1. Critical thinking
There is no agreement about the definition of CT (Raymond et al., 2018 ) and its relationship with memory and comprehension (Dwyer et al., 2014 ). According to Davies and Barnett ( 2015 ), there are three main approaches to CT, namely, ‘skills‐and‐judgement’, ‘skills‐plus‐propensity’ and ‘skills‐plus‐disposition‐actions’ perspectives. The skills‐and‐judgement perspective of CT views CT as the possession of a set of characteristic skills. The skills‐plus‐propensity perspective highlights both skills and dispositions aspects of CT. While the ‘skills‐plus‐disposition‐actions’ view, also known as criticality, sees CT beyond skills and disposition to include actions/activism. The skills‐plus‐propensity view on which this study is based recognizes that activism is an outcome of CT and not necessarily an aspect of CT. Thus, Facione's ( 1990 ) definition accepted for the purposes of this study illustrates skills‐plus‐propensity perspective of CT: ‘…purposeful, self‐regulatory judgment which results in interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference, as well as explanation of the evidential, conceptual, methodological, criteriological, or contextual considerations upon which that judgment is based…’ (Facione, 1990 , p. 5).
Though Facione's definition has been criticized for being long‐winded and difficult to implement (Davies & Barnett, 2015 ), its use for CT assessment in nursing education is evident (Raymond et al., 2017 ). Dwyer et al.'s ( 2014 ) model incorporate both reflective judgement (skills) and self‐regulatory functions of metacognition (disposition) as requirements for CT consistent with Facione's ( 1990 ) definition. Self‐regulation refers to the individual's ability, willingness and perceived need to think critically when solving problems.
3.2. Memory
Critical thinking skills are dependent on what information one can remember (Dwyer et al., 2014 ). Information is either stored in short‐ or long‐term memory. Dwyer et al. ( 2014 ) assert that through deliberate attention or perception processes, information is stored as short‐term memory (working memory). This short‐term memory includes two sub‐systems—phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad; a central executive (attention focussing process that relates to long‐term memory) and episodic buffer (storage centre that integrates new information from working memory with existing memory from long‐term memory) (Baddeley, 2010 ). Through manipulation, information in short‐term memory may be encoded as long‐term memory. Long‐term memory is stored as schemas (categorization of knowledge based on how it will be used).
3.3. Comprehension
Meaningfully organizing information into schemas for future retrieval requires understanding or comprehension (Dwyer et al., 2014 ). Comprehension encompasses the ability to translate or interpret information based on previous learning (Huitt, 2011 ). Long‐term memory and comprehension are fundamental processes for CT application (Dwyer et al., 2014 ).
3.4. Instructional activities
Duron et al. ( 2006 ) designed a 5‐step model to provide a practical impetus in the acquisition of CT skills. This model focuses on steps that educators should take to foster the CT skills of students. The 5‐step framework requires that educators first determine learning objectives. The educator should identify the behaviours that the students should exhibit by the time they exit a course. The objectives should correspond to the higher order of Bloom's taxonomy. Secondly, the importance of teaching through questioning is underlined. The educator should design appropriate questions and questioning techniques to encourage discussion. The questions should vary and be concise to generate student participation. Particularly, divergent questions encourage CT. Thirdly, practice before assessing is considered important – inclusive of learning experiences that encourage active and experiential learning. Fourthly, the educator should continuously review, refine and improve instructional activities for CT skills. These include strategies such as evaluating students' participation through teaching, diary and journaling. Lastly, educators need to provide feedback and assessment of learning. Thoughtful, purposeful and timely feedback should be provided to students on their performance.
It is the contention of these authors that a CT‐based curriculum framework should address factors that either impede or enhance the students' abilities to memorize information (attention/perception processing), comprehend, reflectively make judgement (ability to analyse, evaluate and create) and engage in self‐regulation functions (disposition towards CT). Pursuant to this view, these authors observed classroom instructional practices (Boso et al., 2020 ), explored the experiences of students and educators (Boso et al., 2021c ) and assessed the CT disposition of students (Boso et al., 2021b ). These studies revealed a number of issues that informed the development of a CT‐based curriculum framework. For example, challenges such as seniority tradition, large class size; negative attitude, lack of commitment and inappropriate assessment styles/methods of educators; background and culture, learning practices, lack of comprehension of the participant, distractive behaviour of students (Boso et al., 2020 , 2021c ) were identified. Though students had a confident disposition towards reasoning, they did not have a mindset of truth‐seeking (Boso et al., 2021b ). Lack of involvement of students in curriculum reviews and continuous professional development programs on CT for faculty were also identified as challenges in developing CT skills of students (Boso et al., 2021c ). Also, educators' examination questions about a higher order of thinking constituted <6% (Boso et al., 2021a ).
4.1. Research design
This article is the concluding part of a larger project (see Boso et al., 2020 , 2021a , 2021b , 2021c ) that sought to develop a CT‐based curriculum framework. The study used participatory action research (PAR), specifically, cooperative inquiry (CI) as an overarching research design to develop a CT‐based curriculum framework. CI is one of the approaches embedded in PAR (Mash, 2014 ; Mash & Meulenberg‐Buskens, 2001 ) and is used interchangeable with PAR in this article. PAR inter alia assists in problem solving (Hart & Bond, 1995 ; Mash, 2014 ), promotes organizational improvement (Hart & Bond, 1995), bridges the theory–practice gap (Mash, 2014 ; Rolfe, 1996 ) and allows users to be involved (Beresford, 2006 ).
4.2. Study setting, population and sampling
The study was conducted in the nursing school of an accredited publicly funded university in Ghana. There were approximately 527 nursing students and 16 full‐time faculty members. Like many educational institutions in developing countries, the school had challenges such as a lack of sufficient qualified faculty, and infrastructural and logistical constraints that may militate against assisting students to acquire CT skills. For example, class sizes could range from 50 to 150 students.
The study participants included students who had been enrolled in the degree nursing program for at least a year, nurse educators with current full‐time appointments with at least a year of teaching experience, preceptors and coordinators of CT‐based medical programs. It is believed that these participants had been associated with the nursing educational system long enough to provide rich data on their experiences and expertise. Furthermore, using diverse stakeholders in the study aided in providing balanced perspectives.
Twelve participants comprised 3 educators (with 1 being a coordinator of a CT‐based medical program), 2 preceptors, 6 students and the researcher himself were part of the cooperative inquiry group (CIG). Pertinent to the tenets of cooperative inquiry, these CIG were to collaboratively engage to develop a CT‐based curriculum framework. To select students for the CIG, presentations on the purpose and nature of the study were made in their respective classrooms. A list of those who agreed to participate in the study was compiled based on the different educational levels. Individuals were randomly selected and contacted through email or telephone. Similarly, a list of preceptors was obtained. In the Ghanaian context, preceptors are clinical nurses who instruct students during clinical placement. They were contacted and those who were willing to participate were ranked based on their educational level and experience. Two preceptors with Master's degrees in nursing were selected to participate in the study as their clinical experience and educational background provided the necessary expertise towards developing the CT‐based curriculum framework. Two educators were randomly selected while the coordinator of the CT‐based medical program (also an educator) was purposively invited through email and/or telephone. The CIG was engaged throughout the entire research process to identify ideas, observe, and reflect on results to develop a framework to foster CT skills of students. Seven steps of the research process evolved till the aim of the study was met. Different data sets—qualitative and quantitative—were gathered and analysed, culminating in the development of the framework.
4.3. Summary of research process
In this study, O'Leary's cycle of action research as described by Koshy et al. ( 2011 ) was adopted. The process alternates from observation, reflection and planning to action. Seven steps from observation to action were followed during the entire research project (see Figure 2 ). The cooperative inquiry group members were engaged throughout the seven steps of the research process. In total, three workshop meetings were held.
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is NOP2-10-5129-g002.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is NOP2-10-5129-g002.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333820/bin/NOP2-10-5129-g002.jpg)
Summary of research process.
4.3.1. Step 1
Data were collected on the instructional practices/activities of the selected school from September 2017 to March 2018. These data sets were to aid the CIG in understanding current practices and to provide the baseline data for the development of the framework. Factors that either inhibited or enhanced perception/attention processing and comprehension of information and reflective judgement (analysing, evaluating and creating) according to Dwyer et al.'s ( 2014 ) were identified. Prior to data collection, the participants were exposed to the research methodology and methods at a training workshop held in September 2017. Nine participants—the first author (initiating researcher), two preceptors, one educator and five students—were able to attend this session. The first author introduced the CIG members to the Nominal Group Technique (NGT). The NGT is considered one of the most frequently used formal consensus building techniques (Harvey & Holmes, 2012 ). The NGT includes five stages, namely: (1) introduction and explanation, (2) silent generation of ideas, (3) sharing ideas—round robin, (4) group discussion/clarifying and (5) voting and ranking. Measures to ensure the rigour of inquiry were discussed and agreed upon. Two educators who were unable to attend the session were met individually and the purpose and methods of the study were discussed with them.
4.3.2. Step 2
The analysed data from step 1 were presented to the CIG members at a second meeting held in March 2018. Nine participants—three educators, two preceptors, three students and the first author—were present at this meeting. The CIG deliberated on the results obtained through group discussions facilitated by the first author. Upon reflection, CIG agreed that the data provided enough basis for a draft framework to be considered. Vital issues about instructional practices had been elicited.
4.3.3. Step 3
Following the reflection on the data, the CIG through the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) facilitated by the first author designed a draft framework. Three questions were formulated for the NGT session, namely, (a) What concept(s) should be included in the framework that will facilitate CT skills of nursing students? (b) How should these elements/components/concepts/variables be related? and (c) What should the structure of the framework be?
At the first stage of introduction and explanation of the NGT, purpose of the study, NGT procedure and the three questions for the NGT procedure were reiterated to provide all members with the same point of reference. At the second stage of the NGT, members were allocated 5 minutes to generate ideas for the framework. Seventy‐six concepts were generated. These concepts were collated at the third stage of the NGT process. The fourth stage saw the concepts discussed, their meanings sought and consolidated. Through consensus, some concepts or synonyms were removed, leaving a total of 45 concepts. For example, the concept learner replaced and/or represented similar concepts such as student and nursing students. Likewise, facilitators replaced educators and/or lecturers. The 45 concepts were further consolidated (categorized) into nine. These included learner (and associated characteristics), educator/facilitator (and associated characteristics), teaching methods/style, learning environment, institutional support, assessment, technology, review system and curriculum. At the final stage, the CIG members voted to rank the concepts in order of importance. Learner, facilitator, teaching methods, learning environment and assessment were the five most ranked concepts. The first author was tasked to develop the draft framework with the concepts and relationships for the CIG members to review individually and for subsequent evaluation by students and educators for its applicability. Accordingly, the draft framework was designed by the first author together with one of the CIG members and subsequently distributed to all CIG members for input.
The draft framework suggested that the teaching‐learning process needed to be a caring professional relationship between the learner and the facilitator. This relationship should be the heart of the curriculum. The draft framework included six concepts/components which included: (a) caring professional relationship; (b) facilitator; (c) learner; (d) learning environment; (e) outcome setting, system review and advocacy and (f) contextual dynamics.
4.3.4. Step 4
The draft framework was made available to six educators and eight students in the selected school to review/comment on its applicability. The following questions accompanied the draft framework: How applicable is this framework in facilitating CT skills of students? What do you believe are the strength(s)/weakness(es) of this framework? What concept(s) do you believe should be removed and/or added to the framework to make it more applicable? Three educators and six students evaluated the draft framework. Given that these groups of participants are part of the nursing school, their views about the applicability of the framework were important to consider when implementing the framework in a real‐life situation.
4.3.5. Step 5
The students' and educators' comments and critiques about the draft framework were carefully analysed thematically by the first author. The draft framework was evaluated as applicable by all participants (3 applicable, 6 very applicable). The reasons for their choices included that the framework was simple, realistic, comprehensive (essential factors included), improved relationships for easier communication, made the facilitator a role model, made the learner an active participant and the learner's view was encouraged. Considering the strengths of the framework, the evaluators thought the framework was well structured, bridged gaps in the learner–facilitator relationship, comprehensively covered most factors of education, and covered current trends, and legal/regulatory issues.
The following were seen as the weaknesses of the draft framework by the evaluators: (a) difficulty to elicit commitment from all; (b) challenges associated with the hard environment; (c) possibility of being misused by students; (d) possible failure of the authentic student–facilitator partnership; (e) perceived difficulty to explain complex concepts/processes such as outcome setting, advocacy, system review and (f) possible lack of CT skills of learners and facilitators. They also thought concepts like culture, time, students' involvement, external motivation and career counselling should be included in the framework.
4.3.6. Step 6
The results of the evaluation of the draft framework were presented to the CIG at a workshop facilitated by the first author in May 2018. The comments and critiques of the framework were reflected on by the CIG for possible revision. Eight participants—two preceptors, five students and the first author were present at this 5‐h workshop. The CIG members considered the weaknesses identified during the evaluation as rather systemic challenges in the selected school and not of the framework. In their view, a framework should represent the ideal. Also, the CIG members thought culture, time and students' involvement were already captured.
4.3.7. Step 7
A revised framework was designed to reflect the views of the evaluators of the draft framework. Some concepts/processes were fine‐tuned, and others were further explicated by the members (see Results section for more details). For example, the caring professional relationship was altered to authentic student–facilitator partnership. Likewise, more extended phrases were used to provide further explication to the facilitator, learner and learning environment. Through NGT, ownership was suggested and added to the definition of authentic student–facilitator partnership. The CIG held the assertion that ownership will enhance responsible learner and educator behaviour. The final framework is presented in the Results section.
The results from the cooperative inquiry were organized into a framework illustrating interconnected concepts required to foster CT skills of nursing students in developing countries. The framework proposes six key interconnected thematic priorities (see Figure 3 ) to drive the development of CT of students. The concepts/themes included in the final framework were (a) authentic student–facilitator partnership, (b) a facilitator that makes a difference, (c) a learner that is free to question and encouraged to reflect, (d) a conducive and participatory learning environment, (e) curriculum renewal processes and (f) contextual realities. These six concepts are important components that should drive a curriculum based on CT principles. The concepts which emanated from the CIG discussions are described below.
![An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is NOP2-10-5129-g003.jpg An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is NOP2-10-5129-g003.jpg](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333820/bin/NOP2-10-5129-g003.jpg)
Critical thinking‐based curriculum for undergraduate nursing program.
5.1. Authentic student–facilitator partnership
The authors of this study suggest that the central focus of the teaching–learning process should be authentic partnership between the learner and the facilitator (Raymond et al., 2018 ). This view is motivated by the evidence of dysfunctional learner–facilitator relationships coupled with heightened students' perceptions of mistrust, lack of support, lack of emotional connectedness and lack of democratic practices informed by cultural realities identified (Boso et al., 2020 , 2021c ). These authors define authentic student–facilitator partnership as a supportive, empathetic, learner‐directed, mutually respectful, accountable and democratic learning relationship which focuses on assisting a learner to engage in meaningful learning experiences toward the development of CT skills.
It is suggested that the educator takes responsibility for the optimum functioning of this partnership (Billings & Halstead, 2005 ; Mangena & Chabeli, 2005 ; Raymond et al., 2017 ). However, both the student and the facilitator (Raymond et al., 2018 ) should feel a sense of ownership of the teaching and learning process. The findings of this study suggest that factors relating to both students and facilitators could either facilitate or inhibit the fostering of CT skills acquisition. Consequently, both the student and the facilitator should be committed to setting up appropriate boundaries to govern this partnership. These boundaries should include adherence to educational justice—creating equal opportunities, fair evaluation, fair criticism and non‐discrimination on the basis of gender, race or religious status (Boozaripour et al., 2018 ). Adherence to boundaries is likely to enhance the perception of trust and ownership.
5.2. A facilitator that makes a difference
We see the facilitator as the leader, role model, mentor and guardian of the student for a purposeful learning experience towards CT skills acquisition. It was evident in this study that the facilitator's approach to classroom management and general attitude towards students and cultural realities influenced how students engaged in the teaching and learning process (Boso et al., 2020 , 2021c ). Cultural competence in healthcare is a global standard; thus, the facilitator should be aware of the influence of cultural tendencies (Chan, 2013 ; Donkor & Andrews, 2011 ) on the student–facilitator partnership. The facilitator should become a role model in terms of how he/she collaborates and communicates (Raymond et al., 2018 ) as well as his/her punctuality to class. These general effective teaching tenets are required to set the tone for the reflective engagement of students towards the acquisition of CT skills. For example, a lack of punctuality will limit the amount of instructional time required for students to think critically. Also, the facilitator should demonstrate CT tenets in his/her teaching.
Furthermore, the facilitator needs to demonstrate scholarly attributes and experience in teaching, clinical skills, and theoretical nursing knowledge; be student‐centred, empathetic, supportive; and enthusiastic about the nursing profession and teaching (Billings & Halstead, 2005 ; Mangena & Chabeli, 2005 ; Raymond et al., 2018 ). The facilitator needs to connect with the learner on an emotional level (Raymond et al., 2018 ). It is proposed that the facilitator should use tools such as CT‐oriented learning outcomes/objectives, appropriate assessment for CT and active learning teaching approaches/methods. In addition, teaching and assessment methods should vary and should be driven by appropriate questioning techniques (Duron et al., 2006 ; Raymond et al., 2018 ). These questioning techniques should predominantly target higher‐order of thinking to help students to engage in appropriate thinking moments (Duron et al., 2006 ).
5.3. A learner that is free to question and encouraged to reflect
The learner is the inquirer/discoverer of knowledge guided by the facilitator in an educational program. It was noted in this study that students were influenced by the Ghanaian cultural realities (Boso et al., 2020 , 2021c ) that did not allow them to question authority (Donkor & Andrews, 2011 ) and the type of assessment/teaching methods to which they are exposed. These authors posit that to assist in fostering CT skills of learners, the students should not see themselves as a receptacle in which content/information is dumped, but rather as rational individuals who can decide for themselves regarding truth. Therefore, students should adopt CT‐oriented learning practices that ensure a reflective view of content/information for self‐determination and lifelong learning. This encourages facilitators to share their CT with students (Raymond et al., 2018 ). In addition, they should be encouraged to be self‐motivated and self‐directed.
Strategies needed to promote CT skills in students should include the use of CT‐oriented learning outcomes/objectives, appropriate assessment for CT and active learning teaching methods. Additionally, teaching and assessment methods should vary and should be driven by appropriate questioning techniques (Duron et al., 2006 ; Raymond et al., 2018 ) which should target higher order of thinking to help students to engage in appropriate thinking moments (Duron et al., 2006 ).
5.4. Conducive and participatory learning environment
The authentic student–facilitator partnership between the learner and the facilitator occurs in a conducive learning environment that promotes CT (Mangena & Chabeli, 2005 ; Raymond et al., 2018 ). This environment has two components: hard and soft. The hard environment involves a library, learning space and technology. Appropriate use of technology should be employed in the teaching–learning process. This study showed that students were engaged in distractive use of social media and technology in the classroom (Boso et al., 2020 ). Guidelines for the use of technology/social media should be available to help learners and facilitators derive maximum benefits from these tools. Also, institutional support is required for the provision of appropriate technology, learning space, appropriate class size and library resources for a meaningful learning experience (Raymond et al., 2017 , 2018 ).
The soft environment involves the intangible safe, empathetic and democratic atmosphere created to encourage the learner to share his/her views freely. This conducive atmosphere should permeate the entire school environment. This helps to establish emotional connectedness between the students and other role players in the educational environment (Raymond & Profetto‐McGrath, 2005 ; Raymond et al., 2017 , 2018 ). It was noted in this study that students did not feel adequately supported, and were not regularly engaged in curriculum reviews and other matters that directly affect their learning (Boso et al., 2021c ). Consequently, we propose the establishment of a system of support (including financial aid) for students and practical avenues for students' engagements based on a consultative process involving students and other role players. Additionally, school managers should provide support to facilitators through staff development programs on CT. Assisting faculty development in the area of CT instructional methods will help educators to infuse CT tenets in their own courses (Mangena & Chabeli, 2005 ; Raymond et al., 2017 , 2018 ). Measures such as assigning facilitators with teaching assistants should be adopted to give facilitators more time to engage in CT instructional practices (Shell, 2001 ). Facilitators in this study expressed the concern of inadequate time to engage students, partially due to the absence of teaching assistants.
5.5. Curriculum renewal processes
We propose that renewal processes should be adopted for a CT‐oriented curriculum as a whole and of parts as deemed necessary and considering local, national and international trends. The aim of these processes should be to encourage continuous feedback and review that will lead to curriculum improvement (Duron et al., 2006 ). Students and other role players should be engaged in the curriculum renewal processes. In reviewing the curriculum, contemporary CT assessment theory and practices should be used. Furthermore, the renewal process should adhere to the standards of curriculum review processes. Also, the relevance of courses should be continuously examined to ensure that they attract students' engagement towards CT skills. Consistent with CT activism tenets (Davies & Barnett, 2015 ), advocacy should be encouraged to effect changes that may be occasioned by observations from the curriculum review. Particularly, educators should be encouraged to engage in advocacy to effect changes that may be necessary to assist students to acquire CT skills.
5.6. Contextual realities
A curriculum does not exist in a vacuum. It should be designed and operated in a specific context (Billings & Halstead, 2005 ). The learning process and the extent to which one can address CT skills are influenced by contextual realities. These contextual realities include the program of study, the global/national trends and policies and legal/regulatory framework. For example, as an undergraduate nursing program, CT is highly recommended as a competency (World Health Organization, 2009 ). It is therefore suggested that CT should be taught as a course and teaching methods that support CT be infused into all courses of the program. Global and national trends and policies need to be considered. For example, international development goals, disease patterns and burdens, employer expectations and needs, international best practices and standards, and availability of health facilities and clinical staff for clinicaleducation should guide the curriculum. Additionally, legal/regulatory bodies' requirements need to be adhered to. In the Ghanaian under graduate nursing context, the requirements of the Ghana Tertiary Education Commission (formerly of the National Accreditation Board), the Nursing and Midwifery Council of Ghana and the university in which the program is undertaken would be essential to consider.
6. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Research Ethics Committee approveal was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (Ref. No. FS17/05/106) and the university in which the study was conducted (name withheld to ensure the anonymity of participants). Written permission was sought from the dean of the selected school. All participants including students, nurse educators and preceptors provided informed consent. Given that this was a PAR, the owner of the authorship and the findings were made explicitly clear to the participants as suggested by Mash ( 2014 ). The names and the contributions of participants were kept confidential and the group was supported by the researcher throughout the study.
7. LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
The quality of a PAR is dependent on how the initiating researcher can unmask and diffuse power differentials. The power relational challenges inherent in many studies may be perpetuated (Scotland, 2012). Given that a hierarchical situation and power inequalities could arise because of the involvement of students, the students' representation was increased to form half of the cooperative inquiry group. Also, training of the cooperative inquiry group was carried out to address coercion, collaboration and partnership. The Nominal Group Technique was adopted for decision‐making to ensure that no one's view was disproportionately rated above others. In addition, the absence of one or two members at different times may have influenced the flow and consistency of ideas generated.
8. CONCLUSION
Conducting a study with the purpose of developing a framework of CT development is appropriate for different reasons. Consistent with the context of this study where the seniority tradition exists which may negatively influence the student–faculty relationship, this curriculum framework emphasized the importance of authentic interaction between students and the faculty in facilitating the CT skills of students. The recommended framework derived may suggest a wider implication for nursing schools and universities to provide CT‐based continuous professional development programs for their nurse faculty. Additionally, the study findings may have implications for monitoring and evaluation activities with the view of improving standard setting and teaching–learning experiences of students.
Based on this study, it is envisaged that nurse educators, who play a pivotal role in nursing education, will find reasons to refine their instructional practices. Also, further research focussing on different contexts of CT in Ghana may be useful. Most importantly, this framework may provide direction for how a curriculum can be predicated on CT, thereby removing arbitrariness.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All the authors made substantial contributions to the manuscript. CMB, ASVDM and JG conceived and designed the study. CMB collected data, analysed and drafted the manuscript. ASVDM and JG supervised the study and made critical revisions to the paper.
FUNDING INFORMATION
No external funding.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
We do not have any conflict of interest to report.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to acknowledge Victor Angbah for assisting in data collection. We also express our gratitude to the study participants. Furthermore, we express our profound gratitude to the authority and staff of the educational institution used for this study.
Boso, C. M. , van der Merwe, A. S. , & Gross, J. (2023). Curriculum framework to facilitate critical thinking skills of undergraduate nursing students: A cooperative inquiry approach . Nursing Open , 10 , 5129–5138. 10.1002/nop2.1748 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
- Amoako‐Sakyi, D. , & Amonoo‐Kuofi, H. (2015). Problem‐based learning in resource‐poor settings: Lessons from a medical school in Ghana . BMC Medical Education , 15 , 221–229. 10.1186/s12909-015-0501-4 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory . Current Biology , 20 ( 4 ), R136–R140. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Bell, S. A. , Rominski, S. , Bam, V. , Donkor, E. , & Lori, J. (2013). Analysis of nursing education in Ghana: Priorities for scaling‐up the nursing workforce . Nursing and Health Sciences , 15 ( 2 ), 244–249. 10.1111/nhs.12026 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Beresford, P. (2006). Making the connections with direct experience: From the Western Front to user‐controlled research . Educational Action Research , 14 ( 2 ), 161–169. 10.1080/09650790600717987 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Billings, D. M. , & Halstead, J. A. (2005). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (2nd ed.). Elsevier Inc. [ Google Scholar ]
- Boozaripour, M. , Abbaszadeh, A. , Shahriari, M. , & Borhani, F. (2018). Ethical values in nurse education perceived by students and educators . Nursing Ethics , 25 ( 2 ), 253–263. 10.1177/0969733017707009 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Boso, C. M. , & Gross, J. J. (2015). Nurse educators' perceptions of critical thinking in developing countries: Ghana as a case study . Advances in Medical Education and Practice , 6 , 555–560. 10.2147/AMEP.S88942 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Boso, C. M. , van der Merwe, A. S. , & Gross, J. (2020). Critical thinking skills of nursing students: Observations of classroom instructional activities . Nursing Open , 7 ( 2 ), 581–588. 10.1002/nop2.426 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Boso, C. M. , van der Merwe, A. S. , & Gross, J. (2021a). Analysis of examination questions to determine cognitive level of critical thinking skills required (Manuscript in preparation) .
- Boso, C. M. , van der Merwe, A. S. , & Gross, J. (2021b). Critical thinking disposition of nursing students: A quantitative investigation . Nurse Education in Practice Education in Practice , 55 , 103167. 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103167 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Boso, C. M. , van der Merwe, A. S. , & Gross, J. (2021c). Students' and educators' experiences with instructional activities towards critical thinking skills acquisition in a nursing school . International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences , 14 , 100293. 10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100293 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Butler, H. A. (2012). Halpern critical thinking assessment predicts real world outcomes of critical thinking . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 26 , 721–729. 10.1002/acp.2851 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Chan, Z. C. Y. (2013). A systematic review of critical thinking in nursing education . Nurse Education Today , 33 ( 3 ), 236–240. 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.007 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Chen, G.‐M. , & Chung, J. (2002). Seniority and superiority: A case analysis of decision making in a Taiwanese religious group . Intercultural Communication Studies , 11 ( 1 ), 41–56. [ Google Scholar ]
- Davies, M. , & Barnett, R. (2015). The palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. [ Google Scholar ]
- Donkor, N. T. , & Andrews, L. D. (2011). Ethics, culture and nursing practice in Ghana . International Nursing Review , 58 ( 1 ), 109–114. 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2010.00852.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Dozier, A. L. , Gilbert, B. G. , Hughes, V. W. , Mathis, D. P. , & Jenkins, L. J. (2021). The use of active learning strategies during the COVID‐19 pandemic to promote critical thinking . The ABNF Journal , 32 ( 1 ), 12–16. [ Google Scholar ]
- Dunne, G. (2015). Beyond critical thinking to critical being: Criticality in higher education and life . International Journal of Educational Research , 71 , 86–99. 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.03.003 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Duron, R. , Limbach, B. , & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline . Interrnational Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 17 ( 2 ), 160–166. [ Google Scholar ]
- Dwyer, C. P. , Hogan, M. J. , & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century . Thinking Skills and Creativity , 12 , 43–52. 10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction . California Academic Press. [ Google Scholar ]
- Gholami, M. , Moghadam, P. K. , Mohammadipoor, F. , Tarahi, M. J. , Sak, M. , Toulabi, T. , & Pour, A. H. H. (2016). Comparing the effects of problem‐based learning and the traditional lecture method on critical thinking skills and metacognitive awareness in nursing students in a critical care nursing course . Nurse Education Today , 45 , 16–21. 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.06.007 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Hart, E. , & Bond, M. (1995). Action research for health and social care . Open University Press. [ Google Scholar ]
- Harvey, N. , & Holmes, C. (2012). Nominal group technique (NGT): An effective method of obtaining group consensus . International Journal of Nursing Practice , 18 ( 2 ), 188–194. 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02017.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.'s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational psychology interactive . Valdosta State University. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/bloom.html [pdf]. [ Google Scholar ]
- Koshy, E. , Valsa, K. , & Waterman, H. (2011). Action research in healthcare . SAGE Publications Ltd. [ Google Scholar ]
- Mangena, A. , & Chabeli, M. M. (2005). Strategies to overcome obstacles in the facilitation of critical thinking in nursing education . Nurse Education Today , 25 ( 4 ), 291–298. 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.012 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Mash, B. (2014). African primary care research: Participatory action research . African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicaine , 6 ( 1 ), 42–46. 10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.585 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Mash, B. , & Meulenberg‐Buskens, I. (2001). “Holding it lightly”: The co‐operative inquiry group: A method for developing educational materials . Medical Education , 35 , 1108–1114. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Nursing and Midwifery Council of Ghana . (2015). Curriculum for the registered general nursing (RGN) program: Based on the semester course unit system . Nursing and Midwifery Council of Ghana. [ Google Scholar ]
- Raymond, C. L. , & Profetto‐McGrath, J. (2005). Nurse educators’ critical thinking: Reflection and measurement . Nurse Education in Practice , 5 , 209–217. 10.1016/j.nepr.2004.10.004 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Raymond, C. , Profetto‐McGrath, J. , Myrick, F. , & Strean, W. B. (2017). An integrative review of the concealed connection: Nurse educators' critical thinking . Journal of Nursing Education , 56 ( 11 ), 648–654. 10.3928/01484834-20171020-03 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Raymond, C. , Profetto‐McGrath, J. , Myrick, F. , & Strean, W. B. (2018). Balancing the seen and unseen: Nurse educator as role model for critical thinking . Nurse Education in Practice , 31 , 41–47. 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.04.010 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Rolfe, G. (1996). Going to extremes: Action research, grounded practice and the theory‐practice gap in nursing . Journal of Advanced Nursing , 24 ( 6 ), 1315–1320. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb01040.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Shell, R. (2001). Perceived barriers to teaching for critical thinking by nursing faculty . Nursing and Health Care Perspectives , 22 ( 6 ), 286–291. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
- South African Nursing Council . (2014). Competencies for a nurse educator . South African Nursing Council. [ Google Scholar ]
- Talley, B. (2006). Nurses and nursing education in Ghana: Creating collaborative opportunities . International Nursing Review , 53 ( 1 ), 47–51. 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2006.00431.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Ward‐Smith, P. (2020). The nurse as a critical thinking expert . Urologic Nursing , 40 ( 1 ), 5. 10.7257/1053-816X.2020.40.1.5 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Whiteman, K. , Yaglowski, J. , & Stephens, K. (2021). Quality improvement: Critical thinking tools for quality improvement projects . Critical Care Nurse , 41 ( 2 ), e1–e9. 10.4037/con2021914 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
- Wilmot, E. M. , Kumfo, J. , Danso‐Mensah, D. , & Antwi‐Danso, S. (2013). An Investigation into the factors that contribute to nurse/midwife trainees' poor performance in the final licencing examination in Ghana .
- World Health Organization . (2009). Nursing and midwifery human resources for health: Global standards for the initial education of professional nurses and midwives . World Health Organization. [ Google Scholar ]
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://nursesnow.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/HCA-Nurses-Now-Primary-Logo-Purple-RGB-230x80.png)
APPLY ONLINE
Find Work Fast
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://nursesnow.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Asset-3-NN-Icons-300x300.png)
1300 301 493
Call 1300 301 493, critical thinking in nursing: 8 tips on how it is important.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Nurse Critical Thinking](https://nursesnow.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Nurse-Critical-Thinking-1-1024x576.jpg)
Critical thinking in nursing is a vital skill that is often overlooked. This is a shame because nursing can literally involve life and death decisions – all of which would benefit from critical thinking. Read this blog to find out about the importance of critical thinking in nursing.
![Critical Thinking in Nursing: 8 Tips on How it is Important? 1 Critical Thinking in Nursing](https://nursesnow.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/AdobeStock_570505085-1024x683.jpeg)
What is Critical Thinking?
Critical thinking is a very simple term for a very complex mindset. Broadly speaking, it is examining your own thought processes and identifying any narrow-mindedness, bias, assumptions or oversights. By being aware of these influences over how you think, you can evaluate them and ensure that you are making a decision based on logic, reason and evidence.
While no one can completely remove influencing factors, by being self-aware and practising critical thinking you can make decisions that you feel comfortable about.
There are two forms of critical thinking , with differing levels of difficulty.
1. General Critical Thinking
General critical thinking is a skill set that you can apply to any situation. It is mostly determined by your self-awareness, and some people have higher natural affinities for it than others. The reason it is so difficult is because there are basic skills that need to be known before you can be effective at critical thinking.
For example, it is difficult to identify a biased opinion if you have no general knowledge about the subject in the first place.
2. Domain-Specific Critical Thinking
Domain-specific critical thinking is easier to learn and practise. Just by becoming a nurse, you will have amassed a huge knowledge base about nursing.
Armed with this knowledge, you’ll find it much easier to spot flaws in your reasoning while you are working. Domain-specific is also easier to practise because you are constantly facing opportunities to refine your thinking as you go about your workday.
Now you know the difference between the two forms of critical thinking, find out more about critical thinking in nursing.
8 Steps on How to Use Critical Thinking in Nursing
The Australian College of Nursing has created an 8-step process for nurses to follow if they want to apply critical thinking in nursing.
The steps on critical thinking in nursing are as follows :
- Look : look at, and assess, the patient
- Collect : gather any available information about the patient
- Process : analyse the information and make your interpretations
- Decide/Identify : diagnose the patient based on the evidence
- Plan : decide what outcome you believe is achievable
- Act : Make a treatment plan and act on it
- Evaluate : review the patient’s progress and condition
- Reflect : identify opportunity areas and how you will learn from them
This process may seem overly time-consuming, but the more you do it the faster it will be. Eventually, most of these steps on critical thinking in nursing will happen subconsciously.
8 Tips on the Application of Critical Thinking in Nursing.
Critical thinking makes you better at a variety of skills, like decision making and problem solving. It also helps you avoid common unhelpful mental processes that stop you from reaching your full potential.
1. Objectivity
While nursing is a job that requires emotional intelligence and compassion, it is important that treatment decisions are made objectively. By using critical thinking to focus on the facts before you, rather than on assumptions or biases, you can make sure your decisions are correct.
2. Decision Making Clarity
By stripping away influences like bias and personal opinion, decisions are easier to make with critical thinking. This is because they are evidence and logic based, rather than emotional. By removing the emotional response, you will feel less doubt and avoid second-guessing yourself, which will let you make decisions faster.
3. Teamwork and Feedback Acceptance
Teamwork is crucial to providing proper patient care. By using critical thinking to reflect on criticism and feedback, you can separate useful information from your emotional response.
By not letting hurt feelings and a sense of inadequacy or disappointment spoil the message, not only can you improve yourself based on your teams’ feedback, you can learn how to provide valuable feedback to others in return. While an individual critical thinker is great, a team of critical thinkers is unbeatable.
4. Integrity
The great thing about critical thinking in nursing is that you can use it to hold yourself accountable. Critical thinkers are constantly examining their own beliefs and ethics. Because of that, If you are instructed to do something you believe is incorrect or wrong, you will have the confidence to question it.
You’ll find it much easier to stand up for your convictions when they are clear to you.
5. Curiosity and Problem Solving
Once you begin to tear down assumptions in favour of evidence, you’ll naturally start to become more curious. After all, the more evidence you have, the more accurate your decisions can be.
For most people, it is compelling to maintain the status quo. Once you realise that you are simply following the crowd, you will begin to think outside the box to see if different methods could be more efficient or lead to improved patient outcomes.
6. Perseverance
As your critical thinking abilities develop, you’ll become aware of when you are opting for the path of least resistance. This could be a shortcut in a patient’s treatment or avoiding confronting a colleague over poor performance.
Nurses who use critical thinking are perseverant because they don’t cut corners – they keep going until they find the right solution.
7. Avoid Becoming Trapped in Tradition
A common phenomenon in hospitals is the appeal of tradition. Doing something “because that’s the way it has always been done” can be commonplace because of the mix of ages and experience levels that can be present in a ward. Critical thinking is ideal for avoiding doing something just because it is traditional.
With critical thinking, you can determine whether a tradition is valuable or not by considering it from an impartial, evidence-based point of view.
While that may seem like a lot of different skills to learn, remember that critical thinking is an ongoing, lifelong attempt at self-improvement.
8. Employers Love Critical Thinking in Nursing
Another great benefit of critical thinking in nursing is how great it looks on your resume. Employers love critical thinkers because they know that they are consistent, trustworthy, principled and committed to personal development. Most of all, it shows you are capable of working autonomously.
Learn more about the value of autonomy in nursing.
Nurse agencies in particular place a high value on critical thinking. Agency nurses are able to manage their own schedules and may work across multiple healthcare fields. When they see critical thinking on a resume, they know that the applicant can work independently and that they will bring their own set of standards to any workplace.
If you are considering joining a nursing agency, Nurses Now is the perfect choice. They pride themselves on their values and high standards, so you can rest assured that you are among professionals who embody all the positive traits of critical thinking in nursing.
To learn more about Nurses Now, see our website.
To apply, get in touch today.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing](https://nursesnow.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/HCA-Nurses-Now-Primary-Logo-Purple-RGB-230x80.png)
Recent Posts
Lippincott ® NursingCenter ®
Advice & resources for new nurses, developing critical thinking skills and fostering clinical judgement.
As a new nurse, you likely find yourself focused on tasks and timing. As you gain experience, you will learn to see the big picture and become a critical thinker, anticipating changes in a patient’s condition and preparing for next steps.
- Clinical decision support tools useful for identifying sepsis risk Nursing2024
- Clinical Judgment: The Doing that Happens after Critical Thinking Lippincott NursingCenter
- Discovering your transition to practice Nursing Made Incredibly Easy!
CE Resources
- Account Login
- Search by Specialty
- Search by Category
- Recommended CE
- Licensure Renewals
Nursing Resources
- Career Articles
- Drug Updates
- Patient Education
About NursingCenter
- Advertise with us
- Evidence-Based Practice Network
- Contact Us / Help
Connect with NursingCenter
Connect with us on Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, YouTube, Pinterest, and Instagram.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Facebook](https://www.nursingcenter.com/App_Themes/NursingCenter/images/logo-social-fb.png)
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Relias logo](https://www.relias.com/wp-content/themes/Relias-2019/images/relias-logo-2023.png)
Solutions ∨
Learning and Performance → ∨
Mandatory Training Issue required courses and monitor compliance ∨
Continuing Education Offer clinicians training to meet license requirements ∨
Professional Development Engage staff and empower career growth ∨
Clinical Development Enhance skills with clinician-built content ∨
Certification Review Build knowledge and increase exam pass rates ∨
Competency Management Measure and evaluate knowledge, skills, and abilities ∨
Obstetrics Solution Reduce variation in care with data-driven learning ∨
Onboarding Solution Tailor nurse training and reduce turnover ∨
Recruiting and Staffing → ∨
Talent Acquisition Advertising Target your recruitment to our 3M+ nurse community ∨
Validated Assessments Gauge job fit with clinical, behavioral, situational assessments ∨
Nurse Job Board Post your nurse opportunities on Nurse.com ∨
Compliance Management → ∨
Compliance Software Meet requirements with easy to administer package ∨
View All Solutions → ∨
Who We Serve ∨
Who We Serve → ∨
Hospitals and Health Systems Large multisite systems, critical-access hospitals, staffing agencies ∨
Individual Healthcare Workers Physicians, nurses, clinicians, and allied health professionals ∨
Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Skilled nursing facilities, continuing care retirement communities and life plan communities, assisted living facilities, rehab therapy providers, and hospice agencies ∨
Behavioral and Community Health Behavioral health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, applied behavior analysis, community health centers, and children, youth, and family-serving organizations ∨
Home Health and Home Care Home health and home care agencies and organizations ∨
Government Organizations Federal, state, and local entities ∨
Case Studies ∨
PAM Health Supports Business Growth, Employee Engagement, and Better Patient Outcomes With Relias PAM Health utilized Relias to make post-acquisition employee onboarding easier and to influence positive patient outcomes through high-quality staff training and coaching. ∨
CSIG Depends on the Relias Platform Through Change and Growth Before 2020, Common Sail Investment Group (CSIG) conducted all its senior living staff training and education in person in different locations. ∨
Why Relias ∨
Why Relias → ∨
Technology Engage learners and ease burden for administrators ∨
Measurable Outcomes Improve workforce, organization, and patient results ∨
Services Reduce administrative burden with professional solutions ∨
Expert Content Trust Relias for quality, award-winning courses and tools ∨
Community Tap into clinician resources and peer support ∨
Resources → ∨
How Mental Health and Social Determinants Are Driving Maternal Mortality The CDC has uncovered another dimension affecting the already alarming problem of maternal mortality in the U.S… ∨
2023 DSP Survey Report The 2023 DSP Survey Report highlights feedback from 763 direct support professionals (DSPs) across the country on job satisfaction, supervision… ∨
Resources ∨
Resource Center → ∨
Blog Keep up with industry trends and insights ∨
Articles and Reports Review recently published thought leadership ∨
Success Stories Read about Relias clients improving outcomes ∨
Events Find Relias at an upcoming industry conference ∨
Webinars Register for upcoming key topic discussions ∨
Support Contact us for help with your account ∨
Podcast Explore conversations with healthcare experts ∨
Upcoming Event ∨
Wild on Wounds Conference 2024 Wild on Wounds (WOW) is the third largest wound care conference in the nation, focused on advancing our healthcare workforce with impactful hands-on wound care education built by and for clinicians. ∨
Contact Sales → ∨
About Relias → ∨
Careers View our open positions ∨
Media Review our latest news and make press inquiries ∨
Alliances and Partnerships Scan our industry connections and relationships ∨
Awards Check out our latest recognitions ∨
Diversity Learn more about Relias’ commitment to DEIB ∨
In the News → ∨
Relias Named to Top 10 of Top 100 Healthcare Tech Companies of 2023 Relias announced that it has been named number 10 among the Top 100 Healthcare Technology Companies of 2023 chosen by The Healthcare Technology Report. ∨
Login Portals ∨
Relias Learning ∨
Nurse.com ∨
Relias Academy ∨
Wound Care Education Institute ∨
Relias Media ∨
Need help logging in?
![building critical thinking skills in nursing Nurse dot com logo](https://www.relias.com/wp-content/themes/Relias-2019/images/Nurse-logo-vertical-color.png)
Article Review: Nurse Onboarding Can Improve Critical Thinking, Knowledge, and Satisfaction
By Felicia Sadler, MJ, BSN, RN, CPHQ, LSSBB , on February 3, 2022
Recently published in the Journal for Nurses in Professional Development , Onboarding New Graduate Nurses Using Assessment-Driven Personalized Learning to Improve Knowledge, Critical Thinking, and Nurse Satisfaction aimed to demonstrate how an evidence-based onboarding program can provide the most support possible to new graduate nurses as they transition from the classroom to practice.
The study compared two cohorts, one onboarded using an assessment-driven personalized learning plan, demonstrating:
- 8% improvement in communication
- 8% improvement in critical thinking
- Increased scores in all 5 medical-surgical assessment domains
- Improvement in 16 out of 24 nurse satisfaction scores (compared to only 7 out of 24 improved scores in traditional onboarding cohort)
Effective Nurse Onboarding
Healthcare leaders agree that effective onboarding is key to new nurse success, but often struggle to provide evidence-based support for specific onboarding programs.
However, healthcare organizations will benefit from measuring both the efficiency and effectiveness of an onboarding program. As leaders continue to focus on improving quality of care , improving the patient experience, and reducing readmissions, healthcare organizations find an even greater need for an effective onboarding process to ensure nurses are prepared to care for complex patient populations.
As noted in the study, traditional nursing onboarding programs have focused on technical skills and organization-specific policies and procedures. Although all of these are necessary for safe and effective care, they are not sufficient to meet the demands of today’s higher acuity, complex care environment. Higher acuity and more complex care require a higher level of critical thinking , knowledge, and clinical reasoning regarding disease process and evidence-based research and data to identify where opportunities for improvement exist or even the effectiveness of their process.
A Personalized Approach
It’s no surprise that new nurses will enter an organization with varied levels of knowledge and experiences. If nurse educators provide every nurse with the same information, some nurses may become bored and unengaged (if they’ve already mastered the information being taught), whereas other nurses who need more information may feel lost and left behind.
Nurse onboarding should be personalized to the new nurse in order to keep them engaged. As presented in the study, assessment driven, personalized learning is one important component to ensure knowledge gaps are identified and addressed. This lays the groundwork for a personalized learning approach that respects what the learner already knows.
Nurse Onboarding Study Overview
This study evaluated two cohorts, tracking their onboarding approaches. Compared to a traditional onboarding cohort, one cohort was onboarded using the Relias Onboarding assessment-driven personalized learning plan. The study compared critical thinking, knowledge, and nurse satisfaction between cohorts before and after personalized learning for onboarding.
As outlined in the article, this study showed that areas impacted by the personalized learning for onboarding, including relevant knowledge domains and critical thinking, were higher among nurses who participated in the personalized learning compared to nurses who were hired before the personalized learning was implemented.
For the measure of nurse satisfaction, the onboarding cohort showed improvement on 16 of 24 nurse experience questions between baseline and 12 months later, compared with the pre-onboarding cohort, which only showed improvement on 7 of the 24 nurse experience questions.
Research has demonstrated that effective onboarding programs show higher nurse satisfaction and higher competencies as well as lower turnover and lower stress levels. This suggests that this assessment-driven personalized learning is effective as it demonstrated higher nurse satisfaction and improvements in both knowledge and critical thinking compared to other cohorts.
Role of Relias
An efficient and effective onboarding program clearly demonstrates to new nurses that their healthcare organization is committed in their personal success and is willing to invest in them both personally and professionally.
Relias Onboarding was the assessment-driven personalized learning plan used to quantify the nurses’ clinical knowledge and judgment. This personalized learning component addresses ineffective orientation, by tailoring education to meet each individual nurse’s needs. An initial assessment identifies knowledge gaps for each nurse and then provides learning that addresses those gaps.
Additionally, preceptors can use the information from the assessment to identify which areas new nurses may need more or less support in order to help each nurse become safe, effective, and ready for independent practice.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing ' data-src=](https://www.relias.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/felicia-sadler-mj-bsn-rn-cphq-lssbb_avatar-400x400.png)
Felicia Sadler, MJ, BSN, RN, CPHQ, LSSBB
Vice President, Quality, Relias
Share This Article
![building critical thinking skills in nursing https://www.relias.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Nurse-leading-a-team.png](https://www.relias.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Nurse-leading-a-team.png)
Onboarding New Graduate Nurses Using Assessment-Driven Personalized Learning to Improve Knowledge, Critical Thinking, and Nurse Satisfaction
As published in the Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, this study demonstrated how effective onboarding improved knowledge, critical thinking, and nurse satisfaction.
![building critical thinking skills in nursing green arrow left](https://www.relias.com/wp-content/themes/Relias-2019/images/icon-arrow-green-left.png)
Related Resources
15 behavioral interview questions for nurses.
7 min read | Posted February 6, 2024
Learn 15 behavioral interview questions for nurses to identify candidates with the right characteristics and skills for success and retention.
Nursing Shortage Solutions Are Happening — Because They Must
6 min read | Posted June 2, 2023
Healthcare organizations need nursing shortage solutions to overcome serious workforce challenges that threaten the nurses who remain.
Article Review and Discussion: Determining Best Fit for Newly Licensed Nurses
4 min read | Posted February 2, 2022
A recent study showed how nurses hired into a higher job fit demonstrated a reduction in orientation time.
Connect with Us
to find out more about our training and resources
Get Started
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Critical thinking in nursing is invaluable for safe, effective, patient-centered care. You can successfully navigate challenges in the ever-changing health care environment by continually developing and applying these skills. Images sourced from Getty Images. Critical thinking in nursing is essential to providing high-quality patient care.
The following are examples of attributes of excellent critical thinking skills in nursing. 1. The ability to interpret information: In nursing, the interpretation of patient data is an essential part of critical thinking. Nurses must determine the significance of vital signs, lab values, and data associated with physical assessment.
Critical thinking is applied by nurses in the process of solving problems of patients and decision-making process with creativity to enhance the effect. It is an essential process for a safe, efficient and skillful nursing intervention. Critical thinking according to Scriven and Paul is the mental active process and subtle perception, analysis ...
In summary, critical thinking is an integral skill for nurses, allowing them to provide high-quality, patient-centered care by analyzing information, making informed decisions, and adapting their approaches as needed. It's a dynamic process that enhances clinical reasoning, problem-solving, and overall patient outcomes.
2. Meeting with Colleagues: Collaborative Learning for Critical Thinking. Regular interactions with colleagues foster a collaborative learning environment. Sharing experiences, discussing diverse viewpoints, and providing constructive feedback enhance critical thinking skills. Colleagues' insights can challenge assumptions and broaden ...
Keep reading to learn more about how nurses use critical thinking in practice and how you can develop your own critical thinking skills. Types of Thinking Used in Nursing. Nurses make decisions while providing patient care by using critical thinking and clinical reasoning. In nursing, critical thinking is a broad term that includes reasoning ...
In Brief. After a brief interaction with a nursing student, this nurse educator saw the wisdom of using critical thinking when teaching critical thinking. IN NURSING SCHOOL, I learned about two types of thinking: There is the regular kind, and then there is critical thinking. Although it sounds like it means thinking about important things ...
Some of the most important critical thinking skills nurses use daily include interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation. Interpretation: Understanding the meaning of information or events. Analysis: Investigating a course of action based on objective and subjective data. Evaluation: Assessing the value of ...
Critical thinking in nursing involves the ability to question assumptions, analyze data, and evaluate outcomes. It's a disciplined process that includes observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, and communication. For nurses, critical thinking means being able to make sound clinical judgments that can significantly affect patient outcomes.
Critical thinking is a complex, dynamic process formed by attitudes and strategic skills, with the aim of achieving a specific goal or objective. The attitudes, including the critical thinking attitudes, constitute an important part of the idea of good care, of the good professional.
These reasons as to why critical thinking skills in nursing practice plays a vital role in the care of the patient. Luna (2020), cited seven importance of critical thinking skills in the practice of nursing, such as: ... Knowledge of medical conditions, procedures and its connections to patient's care are important in building critical ...
Critical thinking in nursing is an essential component of professional accountability and quality nursing care. Critical thinkers in nursing exhibit these habits of the mind: confidence, contextual perspective, creativity, flexibility, inquisitiveness, intellectual integrity, intuition, openmindedness, perseverance, and reflection.
Tips to improve your critical thinking skills in nursing. Here are several tips to enhance your critical thinking skills as a nurse: 1. Ask patients open-ended questions. It's important to give all patients the same standard of care. Asking patients to elaborate on their medical history or point of view may help you communicate more effectively ...
The concepts from an escape room are a great way to deliver opportunities for students to practice this skill and can be provided economically and easily. Being creative in managing these concepts will offer an exciting chance to introduce critical thinking for your students. Nursing Education Perspectives42 (6):E145-E146, November/December 2021.
A good way to approach critical thinking is to apply it to the fundamental steps of the nursing process while assessing, diagnosing, planning, implementing, and evaluating. Since nurses are often at patients' bedsides, they usually are the first to notice issues. Nursing requires you to make clinical decisions through the view of several ...
Building critical thinking skills is one of the most important outcomes in the clinical setting for nursing students. Collaboration with nursing faculty during the clinical rotation can ease the burden on direct care nurses and facilitate a positive learning experience for the student. The nursing profession continues to experience several ...
Nursing critical thinking skills drive the decision-making process and impact the quality of care provided," says Georgia Vest, DNP, RN and senior dean of nursing at the Rasmussen University School of Nursing. For example, nurses often have to make triage decisions in the emergency room. With an overflow of patients and limited staff, they ...
The NGT is considered one of the most frequently used formal consensus building techniques ... Critical thinking skills of nursing students: Observations of classroom instructional activities. Nursing Open, 7 (2), 581-588. 10.1002/nop2.426 [PMC free article] [Google Scholar] Boso, C. M. , van der Merwe, A. S. , & Gross, J. (2021a). ...
The importance of nurses' critical thinking skills in improving clinical decision-making is well known (Lee et al., 2017; Ludin, 2018). It has been emphasized that critical thinking and decision-making skills are at the center of all nursing curricula in nursing education (Lee et al., 2017; Reji & Saini, 2022).
A popular strategy to teach critical thinking skills in nursing education is simulation. Both live and virtual simulation can be implemented to improve critical thinking skills and clinical outcomes. Shin et al. (2015) studied the effects of multiple simulation exposures on critical thinking skills.
1. Objectivity. While nursing is a job that requires emotional intelligence and compassion, it is important that treatment decisions are made objectively. By using critical thinking to focus on the facts before you, rather than on assumptions or biases, you can make sure your decisions are correct. 2.
Developing Critical Thinking Skills and Fostering Clinical Judgement. As a new nurse, you likely find yourself focused on tasks and timing. As you gain experience, you will learn to see the big picture and become a critical thinker, anticipating changes in a patient's condition and preparing for next steps. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy ...
Hospitals and Health Systems Large multisite systems, critical-access hospitals, staffing agencies ∨. Individual Healthcare Workers Physicians, nurses, clinicians, and allied health professionals ∨. Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Skilled nursing facilities, continuing care retirement communities and life plan communities, assisted living facilities, rehab therapy providers, and hospice ...
Critical Care Nursing Career Outlook. Critical care nurses treat patients at their most vulnerable, and this is a great responsibility. They must advocate for unconscious patients and comfort their families throughout the patient's admission. The emotional and physical labor that accompanies such a fast-paced role can be intensive.