literature review in research paper ppt

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved July 27, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

The Cersonsky Lab at UW-Madison

The Cersonsky Lab is a research group based at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering

8 Tips for a Literature Review Presentation

by Caleb Youngwerth

Literature reviews for research are very different from any other presentation you may have done before, so prepare to relearn how to present. The goals of research literature reviews are different, the style is different, even the pacing is different. Even if you have previously done a literature review in an academic setting, you will still want to know these tips. I found this out the hard way, so you don’t have to. Also, to clarify, these tips are meant for a literature review of a topic, not a singular study or paper, though many of the tips do apply to both.

1. Highlight current research

The point of a literature review for research is to highlight the current state of research related to your topic, not to simply give background information. Background information is important and should be included, but the focus of the presentation should be showing some current studies that either confirm or challenge the topic you are studying. As much as textbooks from 30 years ago might seem to have all the information you need for your presentation, a research study from this decade does a far better job representing the current state of the topic, which is the end goal of the presentation. Also, since the new research should be the focal point of the presentation, as a general piece of advice, try to give each research study a minimum of one full slide, so you can give a fuller picture of what the study actually concluded and how they reached their conclusion.

2. Alternate old and new

The best way to keep people listening to your presentation is to vary what you include in your presentation. Rather than trying to give all of the background information first and then showcase all the flashy new research, try to use the two interchangeably. Organize the presentation by idea and give all the background needed for the idea, then develop the idea further by using the new research studies to help illustrate your point. By doing this, you not only avoid having to backtrack and reteach the background for each and every new study, but also help keep the presentation interesting for the audience. This method also helps the audience avoid being overwhelmed since only a little bit of new information is introduced at a time. Obviously, you may need to include a brief introductory section that contains nothing but textbook information that is absolutely necessary to understand anything about the topic, but the more varied the presentation, the better.

3. Use complete sentences

Every presentation class up to this point probably has taught you that slides with full sentences are harmful to your presentation because it is distracting to the listener. Unlearn all that information for this style of presentation. Bullet points are still good, but you should have complete ideas (which usually means complete sentences) for every single point. If someone would be able to read your slides and not hear you, and still be able to understand most of your presentation, your literature review is perfect in a research setting. The point of this presentation is to share all the new information you have learned, so hiding it is helping no one. You still do not want to be reading your slides verbatim and can absolutely add information beyond the slides, but all your main ideas should be on the slides.

4. Read smart

I will admit that I stole this tip from Rosy, but it is a very good tip, so I decided to include it. When you read, you want to read as much as you can, but wasting time reading an irrelevant research study is helping no one. When finding a new study, read the abstract, then the conclusion, then the pictures. If it looks like a good study from those three parts, or you personally find it interesting, you then can go over the actual paper and read it, but by reading the less dense parts first, you can get a general idea of the study without actually having to take a lot of time to read the entire paper. Though textbooks and review papers generally are a little more difficult to read using this method, you can still look at the introduction, pictures, and conclusion and save time reading the rest if the source ends up not being interesting or important.

5. Reading is good for you

As much as you want to read smart when you can, the more you read, the more knowledgeable you become. The goal of the presentation is to become an expert on you topic, so the only way you can do that is by reading as much as you can. You should read more information than you present, since many sources you read probably will not fit in a time-constrained presentation. As Rosy likes to say, in anything research, only about 10% of what you know should actually be shared with the world. By reading more, you are better-suited to answer questions, and you also just generally are able to understand what you are studying better because, chances are, the main purpose of this presentation for you is to help you better understand your research. If something looks interesting and is vaguely related to your topic, read it; it will be beneficial to you, even if you do not end up presenting the information.

6. Let pictures talk for you

When reading research papers, the pictures are usually the best part. Your presentation should be the same way. The best way to be able to show the concept you are trying to explain is to literally show it. The best way to show the results of a research study is usually by showing a graph or infographic, so if the paper has a graph that shows the results, you should absolutely use it. Charts, diagrams, and even videos can also help illustrate a piece of background information that might be difficult to put into words. That being said, you should know and be able to explain every single part of the graphic. Otherwise, it loses meaning and makes the audience even more confused. Captions can and should be used to help explain the graphic, not only to remind you, but also let your audience know what the general idea of the graphic is. Since they keep slides interesting, you should probably have some sort of picture on every slide, otherwise the slides will be not only bland, but also likely less informative.

7. Avoid overcrowded slides

Just because you should have a lot of information in your presentation does not mean that your slides need to show that. In fact, a slide with too much information will only harm your presentation since your audience will be distracted trying to read all of a long slide while you are trying to explain it. Doing anything to make slides less dense will help avoid having the audience focused on the slide, so they focus on you more. Transitions that only show one point at a time or wait to reveal an image can be helpful in breaking up an overcrowded slide. Also, simply adding more slides can help since it accomplishes the purpose of putting less information on your slides while still keeping the exact same amount of information. You still want to share as much information as you can with the audience, but overcrowded slides do not accomplish this purpose.

8. Expect questions

Another thing that might be slightly different about a research presentation is questions. Most presentations have the question section after the presenter has finished. Research presentations are different because they allow for questions during the presentation (assuming it is a presentation to a small group). If you get any questions in the middle of the presentation, it is not someone being rude, but simply a fellow researcher who is legitimately curious about your topic. Of course, there will be a question period after the presentation, but you may be asked questions during the presentation. If you read enough information on the topic, you should be able to answer any question easily, but if the question is completely unrelated to anything you read, then it is perfectly reasonable to answer that you did not research the specific area in question. Overall, the questions related to your presentation should not be your biggest worry, but you should definitely be ready.

These are not all the rules for a literature review presentation nor are they set in stone. These are just some tips that I was told or learned that were the most helpful for me, so I hope they will help you too. I had to rewrite my presentation entirely my first literature review because I did not understand some of these differences, so if you give the presentation when you are scheduled to go, you are already better off than I was. Also, do not be afraid to ask anyone in the research group, even Rosy, if you need help. Chances are everyone in the group has given a literature review presentation at some point, so we would be more than happy to help you if you are confused about something. That being said, we are not experts on your topic, so specific questions about organization and content are going to have to be figured out by yourself. Either way, no matter what you do, do not stress out about this presentation. The goal of the presentation is mostly just to help improve your knowledge on a topic, and the presentation is simply to share with the group some of the information you have learned. Best of luck with the presentation, and I hope these tips help clear up what exactly the goal of a literature review presentation in a research setting is.

Newly Launched - AI Presentation Maker

Researched by Consultants from Top-Tier Management Companies

AI PPT Maker

Powerpoint Templates

Icon Bundle

Kpi Dashboard

Professional

Business Plans

Swot Analysis

Gantt Chart

Business Proposal

Marketing Plan

Project Management

Business Case

Business Model

Cyber Security

Business PPT

Digital Marketing

Digital Transformation

Human Resources

Product Management

Artificial Intelligence

Company Profile

Acknowledgement PPT

PPT Presentation

Reports Brochures

One Page Pitch

Interview PPT

All Categories

10 Best Literature Review Templates for Scholars and Researchers [Free PDF Attached]

Imagine being in a new country and taking a road trip without GPS. You would be so lost. Right? Similarly, think about delving into a topic without having a clue or proper understanding of the reason behind studying it. 

That’s when a well-written literature review comes to the rescue. It provides a proper direction to the topic being studied. 

The literature review furnishes a descriptive overview of the existing knowledge relevant to the research statement. It is a crucial step in the research process as it enables you to establish the theoretical roots of your field of interest, elucidate your ideas, and develop a suitable methodology. A literature review can include information from various sources, such as journals, books, documents, and other academic materials. This promotes in-depth understanding and analytical thinking, thereby helping in critical evaluation.

Regardless of the type of literature review — evaluative, exploratory, instrumental, systematic, and meta-analysis, a well-written article consists of three basic elements: introduction, body, and conclusion. Also its essence blooms in creating new knowledge through the process of review, critique, and synthesis.

But writing a literature review can be difficult. Right?

Relax, our collection of professionally designed templates will leave no room for mistakes or anxious feelings as they will help you present background information concisely. 

10 Designs to Rethink Your Literature Reviews

These designs are fully customizable to help you establish links between your proposition and already existing literature. Our PowerPoint infographics are of the highest quality and contain relevant content. Whether you want to write a short summary or review consisting of several pages, these exclusive layouts will serve the purpose. 

Let’s get started.

Template 1: Literature Review PPT Template

This literature review design is a perfect tool for any student looking to present a summary and critique of knowledge on their research statement. Using this layout, you can discuss theoretical and methodological contributions in the related field. You can also talk about past works, books, study materials, etc. The given PPT design is concise, easy to use, and will help develop a strong framework for problem-solving. Download it today.

Download this template

Template 2: Literature Review PowerPoint Slide

Looking to synthesize your latest findings and present them in a persuasive manner? Our literature review theme will help you narrow relevant information and design a framework for rational investigation. The given PPT design will enable you to present your ideas concisely. From summary details to strengths and shortcomings, this template covers it all. Grab it now.

Template 3: Literature Review Template

Craft a literature review that is both informative and persuasive with this amazing PPT slide. This predesigned layout will help you in presenting the summary of information in an engaging manner. Our themes are specifically designed to aid you in demonstrating your critical thinking and objective evaluation. So don't wait any longer – download our literature review template today.

Template 4: Comprehensive Literature Review PPT Slide

Download this tried-and-true literature review template to present a descriptive summary of your research topic statement. The given PPT layout is replete with relevant content to help you strike a balance between supporting and opposing aspects of an argument. This predesigned slide covers components such as strengths, defects, and methodology. It will assist you in cutting the clutter and focus on what's important. Grab it today.

Template 5: Literature Review for Research Project Proposal PPT

Writing a literature review can be overwhelming and time-consuming, but our project proposal PPT slides make the process much easier. This exclusive graphic will help you gather all the information you need by depicting strengths and weaknesses. It will also assist you in identifying and analyzing the most important aspects of your knowledge sources. With our helpful design, writing a literature review is easy and done. Download it now.

Template 6: Literature Review for Research Project Proposal Template

Present a comprehensive and cohesive overview of the information related to your topic with this stunning PPT slide. The given layout will enable you to put forward the facts and logic to develop a new hypothesis for testing. With this high-quality design, you can enumerate different books and study materials taken into consideration. You can also analyze and emphasize the technique opted for inquiry. Get this literature review PowerPoint presentation template now.

Template 7: Literature Review for Research Paper Proposal PowerPoint Slide

Lay a strong foundation for your research topic with this impressive PowerPoint presentation layout. It is easy to use and fully customizable. This design will help you describe the previous research done. Moreover, you can enlist the strengths and weaknesses of the study clearly. Therefore, grab it now.

Template 8: Literature Review for Research Paper Proposal PPT

Download this high-quality PPT template and write a well-formatted literature review. The given layout is professionally designed and easy to follow. It will enable you to emphasize various elements, such as materials referred to, past work, the list of books, approach for analysis, and more. So why wait? Download this PowerPoint design immediately.

Template 9: Literature Review for Academic Student Research Proposal PPT

With this exclusive graphic, you'll have everything you need to create a well-structured and convincing literature review. The given design is well-suited for students and researchers who wish to mention reliable information sources, such as books and journals, and draw inferences from them. You can even focus on the strong points of your study, thereby making an impactful research statement. Therefore, grab this PPT slide today.

Template 10: Literature Review Overview for Research Process PPT

Demonstrate your analytical skills and understanding of the topic with this predesigned PowerPoint graphic. The given research overview PPT theme is perfect for explaining what has been done in the area of your topic of interest. Using this impressive design, you can provide an accurate comparison showcasing the connections between the different works being reviewed. Get it right away.  

Creating an effective literature review requires discipline, study, and patience. Our collection of templates will assist you in presenting an extensive and cohesive summary of the relevant works. These PPT layouts are professionally designed, fully editable, and visually appealing. You can modify them and create perfect presentations according to your needs. So download them now!

P.S. Are you looking for a way to communicate your individual story? Save your time with these predesigned book report templates featured in this guide . 

Download the free Literature Review Template PDF .

Related posts:

• How to Design the Perfect Service Launch Presentation [Custom Launch Deck Included]
• Quarterly Business Review Presentation: All the Essential Slides You Need in Your Deck
• [Updated 2023] How to Design The Perfect Product Launch Presentation [Best Templates Included]
• 99% of the Pitches Fail! Find Out What Makes Any Startup a Success

Liked this blog? Please recommend us

Top 11 Book Report Templates to Tell Your Inspirational Story [Free PDF Attached]

6 thoughts on “10 best literature review templates for scholars and researchers [free pdf attached]”.

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA - the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

--> Digital revolution powerpoint presentation slides

--> Sales funnel results presentation layouts

--> 3d men joinning circular jigsaw puzzles ppt graphics icons

--> Business Strategic Planning Template For Organizations Powerpoint Presentation Slides

--> Future plan powerpoint template slide

--> Project Management Team Powerpoint Presentation Slides

--> Brand marketing powerpoint presentation slides

--> Launching a new service powerpoint presentation with slides go to market

--> Agenda powerpoint slide show

--> Four key metrics donut chart with percentage

--> Engineering and technology ppt inspiration example introduction continuous process improvement

--> Meet our team representing in circular format

• Google Slides Presentation Design
• Pitch Deck Design
• Powerpoint Redesign
• Other Design Services

• Guide & How to's

How to present a research paper in PPT: best practices

A research paper presentation is frequently used at conferences and other events where you have a chance to share the results of your research and receive feedback from colleagues. Although it may appear as simple as summarizing the findings, successful examples of research paper presentations show that there is a little bit more to it.

In this article, we’ll walk you through the basic outline and steps to create a good research paper presentation. We’ll also explain what to include and what not to include in your presentation of research paper and share some of the most effective tips you can use to take your slides to the next level.

Research paper PowerPoint presentation outline

Creating a PowerPoint presentation for a research paper involves organizing and summarizing your key findings, methodology, and conclusions in a way that encourages your audience to interact with your work and share their interest in it with others. Here’s a basic research paper outline PowerPoint you can follow:

1. Title (1 slide)

Typically, your title slide should contain the following information:

• Title of the research paper
• Affiliation or institution
• Date of presentation

2. Introduction (1-3 slides)

On this slide of your presentation, briefly introduce the research topic and its significance and state the research question or objective.

3. Research questions or hypothesis (1 slide)

This slide should emphasize the objectives of your research or present the hypothesis.

4. Literature review (1 slide)

Your literature review has to provide context for your research by summarizing relevant literature. Additionally, it should highlight gaps or areas where your research contributes.

5. Methodology and data collection (1-2 slides)

This slide of your research paper PowerPoint has to explain the research design, methods, and procedures. It must also Include details about participants, materials, and data collection and emphasize special equipment you have used in your work.

6. Results (3-5 slides)

On this slide, you must present the results of your data analysis and discuss any trends, patterns, or significant findings. Moreover, you should use charts, graphs, and tables to illustrate data and highlight something novel in your results (if applicable).

7. Conclusion (1 slide)

Your conclusion slide has to summarize the main findings and their implications, as well as discuss the broader impact of your research. Usually, a single statement is enough.

8. Recommendations (1 slide)

If applicable, provide recommendations for future research or actions on this slide.

9. References (1-2 slides)

The references slide is where you list all the sources cited in your research paper.

10. Acknowledgments (1 slide)

On this presentation slide, acknowledge any individuals, organizations, or funding sources that contributed to your research.

11. Appendix (1 slide)

If applicable, include any supplementary materials, such as additional data or detailed charts, in your appendix slide.

The above outline is just a general guideline, so make sure to adjust it based on your specific research paper and the time allotted for the presentation.

Steps to creating a memorable research paper presentation

Creating a PowerPoint presentation for a research paper involves several critical steps needed to convey your findings and engage your audience effectively, and these steps are as follows:

Step 1. Understand your audience:

• Identify the audience for your presentation.
• Tailor your content and level of detail to match the audience’s background and knowledge.

Step 2. Define your key messages:

• Clearly articulate the main messages or findings of your research.
• Identify the key points you want your audience to remember.

Step 3. Design your research paper PPT presentation:

• Use a clean and professional design that complements your research topic.
• Choose readable fonts, consistent formatting, and a limited color palette.
• Opt for PowerPoint presentation services if slide design is not your strong side.

Step 4. Put content on slides:

• Follow the outline above to structure your presentation effectively; include key sections and topics.
• Organize your content logically, following the flow of your research paper.

Step 5. Final check:

• Proofread your slides for typos, errors, and inconsistencies.
• Ensure all visuals are clear, high-quality, and properly labeled.

Step 6. Save and share:

• Save your presentation and ensure compatibility with the equipment you’ll be using.
• If necessary, share a copy of your presentation with the audience.

By following these steps, you can create a well-organized and visually appealing research paper presentation PowerPoint that effectively conveys your research findings to the audience.

What to include and what not to include in your presentation

In addition to the must-know PowerPoint presentation recommendations, which we’ll cover later in this article, consider the following do’s and don’ts when you’re putting together your research paper presentation:

• Focus on the topic.
• Be brief and to the point.
• Attract the audience’s attention and highlight interesting details.
• Use only relevant visuals (maps, charts, pictures, graphs, etc.).
• Use numbers and bullet points to structure the content.
• Make clear statements regarding the essence and results of your research.

Don’ts:

• Don’t write down the whole outline of your paper and nothing else.
• Don’t put long, full sentences on your slides; split them into smaller ones.
• Don’t use distracting patterns, colors, pictures, and other visuals on your slides; the simpler, the better.
• Don’t use too complicated graphs or charts; only the ones that are easy to understand.
• Now that we’ve discussed the basics, let’s move on to the top tips for making a powerful presentation of your research paper.

8 tips on how to make research paper presentation that achieves its goals

You’ve probably been to a presentation where the presenter reads word for word from their PowerPoint outline. Or where the presentation is cluttered, chaotic, or contains too much data. The simple tips below will help you summarize a 10 to 15-page paper for a 15 to 20-minute talk and succeed, so read on!

Tip #1: Less is more

You want to provide enough information to make your audience want to know more. Including details but not too many and avoiding technical jargon, formulas, and long sentences are always good ways to achieve this.

Tip #2: Be professional

Avoid using too many colors, font changes, distracting backgrounds, animations, etc. Bullet points with a few words to highlight the important information are preferable to lengthy paragraphs. Additionally, include slide numbers on all PowerPoint slides except for the title slide, and make sure it is followed by a table of contents, offering a brief overview of the entire research paper.

Tip #3: Strive for balance

PowerPoint slides have limited space, so use it carefully. Typically, one to two points per slide or 5 lines for 5 words in a sentence are enough to present your ideas.

Tip #4: Use proper fonts and text size

The font you use should be easy to read and consistent throughout the slides. You can go with Arial, Times New Roman, Calibri, or a combination of these three. An ideal text size is 32 points, while a heading size is 44.

Tip #5: Concentrate on the visual side

A PowerPoint presentation is one of the best tools for presenting information visually. Use graphs instead of tables and topic-relevant illustrations instead of walls of text. Keep your visuals as clean and professional as the content of your presentation.

Tip #6: Practice your delivery

Always go through your presentation when you’re done to ensure a smooth and confident delivery and time yourself to stay within the allotted limit.

Tip #7: Get ready for questions

Anticipate potential questions from your audience and prepare thoughtful responses. Also, be ready to engage in discussions about your research.

Tip #8: Don’t be afraid to utilize professional help

If the mere thought of designing a presentation overwhelms you or you’re pressed for time, consider leveraging professional PowerPoint redesign services . A dedicated design team can transform your content or old presentation into effective slides, ensuring your message is communicated clearly and captivates your audience. This way, you can focus on refining your delivery and preparing for the presentation.

Lastly, remember that even experienced presenters get nervous before delivering research paper PowerPoint presentations in front of the audience. You cannot know everything; some things can be beyond your control, which is completely fine. You are at the event not only to share what you know but also to learn from others. So, no matter what, dress appropriately, look straight into the audience’s eyes, try to speak and move naturally, present your information enthusiastically, and have fun!

If you need help with slide design, get in touch with our dedicated design team and let qualified professionals turn your research findings into a visually appealing, polished presentation that leaves a lasting impression on your audience. Our experienced designers specialize in creating engaging layouts, incorporating compelling graphics, and ensuring a cohesive visual narrative that complements content on any subject.

#ezw_tco-2 .ez-toc-widget-container ul.ez-toc-list li.active::before { background-color: #ededed; } Table of contents

• Presenting techniques
• 50 tips on how to improve PowerPoint presentations in 2022-2023 [Updated]
• Present financial information visually in PowerPoint to drive results
• Keynote VS PowerPoint
• Types of presentations

• Design Tips

8 rules of effective presentation

• Business Slides

Employee training and onboarding presentation: why and how

How to structure, design, write, and finally present executive summary presentation?

Got any suggestions?

We want to hear from you! Send us a message and help improve Slidesgo

Top searches

Trending searches

90 templates

welcome back to school

109 templates

meet the teacher

31 templates

35 templates

38 templates

classroom rules

5 templates

Literature Review

It seems that you like this template, literature review presentation, free google slides theme, powerpoint template, and canva presentation template.

Whether you're a student or an academic, mastering the literature review is a key skill in scholarly writing. This fully customizable Google Slides and PowerPoint template can assist you in structuring your review seamlessly. Featuring a vibrant yellow design with captivating book illustrations, this template is designed to facilitate the organization and presentation of your research. Navigate your audience through chapters, themes, and references with ease and clarity using this versatile academic tool. Utilize this tool to craft an impressive literature review that leaves a lasting impression!

Features of this template

• 100% editable and easy to modify
• 35 different slides to impress your audience
• Contains easy-to-edit graphics such as graphs, maps, tables, timelines and mockups
• Includes 500+ icons and Flaticon’s extension for customizing your slides
• Designed to be used in Google Slides, Canva, and Microsoft PowerPoint
• 16:9 widescreen format suitable for all types of screens
• Includes information about fonts, colors, and credits of the resources used

How can I use the template?

Am I free to use the templates?

How to attribute?

Attribution required If you are a free user, you must attribute Slidesgo by keeping the slide where the credits appear. How to attribute?

Register for free and start downloading now

Related posts on our blog.

How to Add, Duplicate, Move, Delete or Hide Slides in Google Slides

How to Change Layouts in PowerPoint

How to Change the Slide Size in Google Slides

Related presentations.

Premium template

Unlock this template and gain unlimited access

Create your presentation Create personalized presentation content

Writing tone, number of slides.

Register for free and start editing online

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

literature review.pptx

Related Papers

tecnico emergencias

Learning how to effectively write a literature review is a critical tool for success for an academic, and perhaps even professional career. Being able to summarize and synthesize prior research pertaining to a certain topic not only demonstrates having a good grasp on available information for a topic, but it also assists in the learning process. Although literature reviews are important for one's academic career, they are often misunderstood and underdeveloped. This article is intended to provide both undergraduate and graduate students in the criminal justice field specifically, and social sciences more generally, skills and perspectives on how to develop and/or strengthen their skills in writing a literature review. Included in this discussion are foci on the structure , process, and art of writing a literature review. What is a Literature Review? In essence, a literature review is a comprehensive overview of prior research regarding a specific topic. The overview both shows the reader what is known about a topic, and what is not yet known, thereby setting up the rationale or need for a new investigation, which is what the actual study to which the literature review is attached seeks to do. Stated a bit differently (Creswell 1994, pp. 20, 21) explains: The literature in a research study accomplishes several purposes: (a) It shares with the reader the results of other studies that are closely related to the study being reported (Fraenkel & Wallen, 1990. (b) It relates a study to the larger, ongoing dialog in the literature about a topic, filling in gaps and extending prior studies (Marshall & Rossman, 1989). (c) It provides a framework for establishing the importance of the study. As an overview, a well done literature review includes all of the main themes and subthemes found within the general topic chosen for the study. These themes and subthemes are usually interwoven with the methods or findings of the prior research. Also, a literature review sets the stage for and JOURNAL

yakubu nawati

Tatam Chiway , Abdullah Ramdhani , Muhammad Ali Ramdhani

Rebekka Tunombili

Gazala Hasan

A literature review is a critical part of any research project, serving as a foundation for the entire study. It showcases your ability to research, synthesize, and evaluate information, which not only demonstrates your expertise on a given topic but also aids in building a strong argument for your research. This guide will elaborate on what a literature review is, its purpose, how to organize and synthesize information, and the different parts of a literature review.

A literature review is a critical consideration of the work by authors and researchers who have written on a particular topic. IT involves synthesising these writings so that a 'picture' of the issue under review forms. Therefore, it requires you to use summarising, analytical and evaluative skills. The effectiveness of these will, to a large extent, depend on your ability to link the work of various authors highlighting similarities, differences, strengths and weaknesses. A Literature Review is not a list describing or summarising one piece of literature after another, so avoid beginning each paragraph with the name of the researcher.

Amanda Bolderston

A literature review can be an informative, critical, and useful synthesis of a particular topic. It can identify what is known (and unknown) in the subject area, identify areas of controversy or debate, and help formulate questions that need further research. There are several commonly used formats for literature reviews, including systematic reviews conducted as primary research projects; reviews written as an introduction and foundation for a research study, such as a thesis or dissertation; and reviews as secondary data analysis research projects. Regardless of the type, a good review is characterized by the author’s efforts to evaluate and critically analyze the relevant work in the field. Published reviews can be invaluable, because they collect and disseminate evidence from diverse sources and disciplines to inform professional practice on a particular topic. This directed reading will introduce the learner to the process of conducting and writing their own literature review.

Andrew Johnson

This chapter describes the process of writing a literature review and what the product should look like

HUMANUS DISCOURSE

Humanus Discourse

The importance of literature review in academic writing of different categories, levels, and purposes cannot be overemphasized. The literature review establishes both the relevance and justifies why new research is relevant. It is through a literature review that a gap would be established, and which the new research would fix. Once the literature review sits properly in the research work, the objectives/research questions naturally fall into their proper perspective. Invariably, other chapters of the research work would be impacted as well. In most instances, scanning through literature also provides you with the need and justification for your research and may also well leave a hint for further research. Literature review in most instances exposes a researcher to the right methodology to use. The literature review is the nucleus of a research work that might when gotten right spotlights a work and can as well derail a research work when done wrongly. This paper seeks to unveil the practical guides to writing a literature review, from purpose, and components to tips. It follows through the exposition of secondary literature. It exposes the challenges in writing a literature review and at the same time recommended tips that when followed will impact the writing of the literature review.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Sadiqur Rahaman

Meriel Louise Anne Villamil

International Journal of P R O F E S S I O N A L Business Review

Velvet Raven

Christopher N Lawrence

Frances Slack

Ignacio Illan Conde

How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries?

Gavin Mount

Research Methodology Assignment

KMB Electricals & Plumbing

Mike Lambert

Nirmal Kumar Raut

Nicole Albrecht

PLoS Computational Biology

Marco Pautasso

Maamar Missoum

Pretty Xeena

Sidney Hurt

Zheng Huang

Miradas Johnson

Auxiliadora Padilha

Journal of Asian Development

Erni Murniarti

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

University Libraries      University of Nevada, Reno

• Skill Guides
• Subject Guides

Literature Reviews

• Searching for Literature
• Organizing Literature and Taking Notes
• Writing and Editing the Paper
• Help and Resources

Book an Appointment

What Is a Literature Review?

A literature review surveys and synthesizes the scholarly research literature related to a particular topic. Literature reviews both explain research findings and analyze the quality of the research in order to arrive at new insights.

Literature reviews may describe not only the key research related to a topic of inquiry but also seminal sources, influential scholars, key theories or hypotheses, common methodologies used, typical questions asked, or common patterns of inquiry.

There are different types of literature reviews.  A narrative literature review summarizes and synthesizes the findings of numerous research articles, but the purpose and scope of narrative literature reviews vary widely. The term "literature review" is most commonly used to refer to narrative literature reviews, and these are the types of works that are described in this guide. 

Some types of literature reviews that use prescribed methods for identifying and evaluating evidence-based literature related to specific questions are known as systematic reviews or meta-analyses . Systematic reviews or meta-analyses are typically conducted by at least two scholars working in collaboration as prescribed by certain guidelines, but narrative literature reviews may be conducted by authors working alone.

Purpose of a Literature Review

Literature reviews serve an important function in developing the scholarly record. Because of the vast amount of scholarly literature that exists, it can be difficult for readers to keep up with the latest developments related to a topic, or to discern which ideas, themes, authors, or methods are worthy of more attention. Literature reviews help readers to understand and make sense of a large body of scholarship.

Literature reviews also play an important function in assessing the quality of the evidence base in relation to a particular topic. Literature reviews contain assessments of the evidence in support of particular interventions, policies, programs, or treatments.

The literature that is reviewed may include a variety of types of research, including empirical research, theoretical works, and reports of practical application. The scholarly works that are considered for inclusion in a literature review may appear in a variety of publication types, including scholarly journals, books, conference proceedings, reports, and others. 

Steps in the Process

Follow these steps to conduct your literature review:

• Select a topic and prepare for searching.  Formulate a research question and establish inclusion and exclusion criteria for your search.
• Search for and organize the research. Use tools like the library website, library-subscription databases, Google Scholar, and others to locate research on your topic.
• Organize your research, read and evaluate it, and take notes. Use organizational and note-taking strategies to read sources and prepare for writing. 
• Write and edit the paper. Synthesize information from sources to arrive at new insights.

Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students

View the video below for an overview of the process of writing literature review papers.

Video:  Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students  by  libncsu

• Next: Searching for Literature >>

• My presentations

Auth with social network:

Download presentation

We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Writing and Presenting Literature Review

Published by Gabriella Drake Modified over 10 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Writing and Presenting Literature Review"— Presentation transcript:

Conducting Research Investigating Your Topic Copyright 2012, Lisa McNeilley.

Critical Reading Prof. Dr. Khalid Mahmood

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process

Jeopardy Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 5 Q 6Q 16Q 11Q 21 Q 7Q 12Q 17Q 22 Q 8Q 13Q 18 Q 23 Q 9 Q 14Q 19Q 24 Q 10Q 15Q 20Q 25 Final Jeopardy Writing Terms.

Poster & Project Presentations The Robert Gordon University

Training agenda Literature review – What and why

Desmond Thomas LTU Developing effective reading strategies and productive routines Dr Desmond Thomas, University of Essex.

What’s the topic of our essay?

CSE594 Fall 2009 Jennifer Wong Oct. 14, 2009

How to Write an Introduction

HOW TO WRITE AN ACADEMIC PAPER

McColl-Kennedy & Tombs Professor Janet R. McColl-Kennedy University of Queensland AMA SERVSIG Doctoral Consortium 29 June 2006 Acknowledgement – (former.

Writing a Literature Review. Overview What is a literature review? Selecting Articles to Review Structure of a Literature Review.

WRITING RESEARCH PAPERS Puvaneswary Murugaiah. INTRODUCTION TO WRITING PAPERS Conducting research is academic activity Research must be original work.

Anatomy Laboratory Write up Emulate standard Scientific Paper (few exceptions)

Literature review Cindy Wee Te Puna Ako Learning centre.

Helpful Hints to Conduct and Write a Literature Review October 2006.

Writing Reports: Identify these stages I) Obtaining a clear specification II) Research & preparation III) Report writing.

Completing a Literature Review

1 Writing Tips. 2 Readability Consistent terms (concepts, var. names) Moving from Big ideas to concrete examples Coherence (from ¶ to ¶; section to section)

About project

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Digitalisation of manufacturing systems: a literature review of approaches to assess the sustainability of digitalisation technologies in production systems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

2. background and scope of the research, 2.1. digitalisation technology in manufacturing systems, 2.2. sustainability as an assessment criteria for digitalisation technologies in manufacturing systems, 2.3. research questions.

• RQ 1: What is the importance of “digitalisation technologies (DTs and CPSs) and sustainability” in production environments in research?
• RQ 2: Which subjects are discussed in terms of “digitalisation technologies (DTs and CPSs) and sustainability”?
• RQ 3: How is the sustainability assessment of digitalisation technologies (DTs and CPSs) discussed in research?
• RQ 4: Which approaches exist to assess the economic and environmental benefits of digitalisation technologies (DTs and CPSs) in manufacturing systems?

3.1. Literature Review

3.2. data collection and analysis.

• (1) Identification: In the first step, the search terms are defined. Based on the research questions, these terms focus on cyber–physical production systems (CP(P)Ss) and digital twins (DTs) in the production environment. To ensure no relevant literature is missed, no further restrictions were imposed regarding environmental or economic assessment. Therefore, the literature search used the terms “digital twin”, “cyber-physical (production) system” and “manufacturing” and connected them to the search terms (ALL = (manufacturing production “digital twin*”)) and (ALL = (manufacturing production “cyber physical system*” “cyber physical production system*”)) (used queries in “web of Science”: Query 1: manufacturing production “digital twin*”, Query 2: manufacturing production "cyber physical system*" “cyber physical production system*”).
• (2) Screening: In the second step, duplicates are removed and the remaining search results are filtered. To identify the articles that are relevant to the research problem, the titles and keywords of the papers are analysed first. All papers that obviously deal with another topic are excluded (no production background). Further, the abstracts of the remaining research results are analysed and assigned to the categories Industry 4.0, digital twins and cyber–physical systems (including CPPSs). Papers with another I4.0 background (Big Data, AI) are excluded. To identify and categorise the literature that deals with the cost and resource efficiency assessment of digitalisation technologies in production systems, the categories environmental and economical are added. Publications were considered that address environmental or economic issues in the context of CPSs or DTs. From this, papers can be derived that basically deal with the use of digitalisation technology to increase cost or resource efficiency. These categories are necessary to study the importance and dynamics of the research subject related to the search term (RQ 1 and RQ 2). These publications are classified according to the year of publication, the type of publication, the journal category (engineering, environmental, computer and other sciences), the most important journals, the frequency of keywords, the regions (countries) and the most important universities (institutes) of the publications.
• (3) Eligibility: In the third step, the existing methods for holistic assessment are filtered out of these results and evaluated in terms of whether they deal with (i) a holistic approach for an economic and/or environmental assessment, (ii) efforts (costs) and benefits associated with digitalisation technologies, (iii) a specific economic assessment and (iv) a specific environmental assessment (RQ 3). In addition, the cross-references of the literature examined are analysed in a snowball search and included in the LR. This is carried out based on the relevant literature, as it is assumed that other relevant literature is mentioned there. As a result, various subject fields are characterised to determine the relevance of the sustainability assessment of digitalisation technologies in research.
• (4) Selection: In the fourth step, the papers that meet the criteria are analysed in terms of content in relation to RQ 4 to identify the methods used for a holistic assessment of digitalisation technologies. It is essential to describe the status of the methods presented and to analyse them with regard to the consistency of the approach from problem description to decision-making. Other criteria are whether the assessment includes the entire life cycle from cradle to grave in the assessment methodology and whether it takes into account different impact categories and linear/non-linear cost–benefit functions. It is also of interest whether common assessment methods are applied and whether these consider economic and environmental sustainability dimensions.

4.1. Quantitative Results

4.1.1. identification and screening results, 4.1.2. chronological development, type and journal of publications, 4.1.3. keyword analysis, 4.1.4. publications per country and organisations, 4.1.5. characterisation by subject fields, 4.2. qualitative results, 4.2.1. content analysis, 4.2.2. analysis of the assessment methods, 5. discussion, 5.1. importance of digitalisation technologies and sustainability in research, 5.2. research subjects in the field of digitalisation technologies and sustainability, 5.3. sustainability assessment of digitalisation technologies in research, 5.4. approaches for the economic and environmental assessment of digitalisation technologies, 6. conclusions, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Sartal, A.; Bellas, R.; Mejías, A.M.; García-Collado, A. The sustainable manufacturing concept, evolution and opportunities within Industry 4.0: A literature review. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2020 , 12 , 1687814020925232. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kumar, R.; Singh, R.K.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Application of industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations: Analysis of challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 275 , 124063. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Biedermann, H.; Topic, M. Digitalisierung im Kontext von Nachhaltigkeit und Klimawandel—Chancen und Herausforderungen für produzierende Unternehmen. In CSR und Klimawandel ; Sihn-Weber, A., Fischler, F., Eds.; Springer GmbH: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 41–62. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dillinger, F.; Bernhard, O.; Kagerer, M.; Reinhart, G. Industry 4.0 implementation sequence for manufacturing companies. Prod. Eng. 2022 , 16 , 705–718. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Klimant, P.; Koriath, H.-J.; Schumann, M.; Winkler, S. Investigations on digitalization for sustainable machine tools and forming technologies. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2021 , 117 , 2269–2277. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leiden, A.; Herrmann, C.; Thiede, S. Cyber-physical production system approach for energy and resource efficient planning and operation of plating process chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 280 , 125160. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rojek, I.; Mikołajewski, D.; Dostatni, E. Digital Twins in Product Lifecycle for Sustainability in Manufacturing and Maintenance. Appl. Sci. 2020 , 11 , 31. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tschiggerl, K.; Topic, M. Potenziale durch Industrie 4.0 zur Steigerung der Ressourceneffizienz. WINGbusiness 2018 , 51 , 25–28. [ Google Scholar ]
• Krommes, S.; Tomaschko, F. Conceptual Framework of a Digital Twin Fostering Sustainable Manufacturing in a Brownfield Approach of Small Volume Production for SMEs. In Manufacturing Driving Circular Economy, Proceedings of the 18th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, Berlin, Germany, 5–7 October 2022 ; Kohl, H., Seliger, G., Dietrich, F., Eds.; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023. [ Google Scholar ]
• Krommes, S.; Tomaschko, F. Chance für mehr Ressourceneffizienz. Z. Wirtsch. Fabr. 2021 , 116 , 58–63. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ma, S.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, J.; Yang, H.; Wu, J. Energy-cyber-physical system enabled management for energy-intensive manufacturing industries. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 226 , 892–903. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schebek, L.; Kannengießer, J.; Campitelli, A.; Fischer, J.; Abele, E.; Bauerdick, C.; Anderl, R.; Haag, S.; Sauer, A.; Mandel, J.; et al. Ressourceneffizienz Durch Industrie 4.0: Potenziale für KMU des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes. 2017. Available online: https://www.ipa.fraunhofer.de/de/Publikationen/studien/studie-ressourceneffizienz.html (accessed on 21 February 2024).
• Neumeier, A.; Wolf, T.; Oesterle, S. The Manifold Fruits of Digitalization—Determining the Literal Value Behind. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 12–15 February 2017; pp. 484–498. [ Google Scholar ]
• Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Sinha, A.K. Digital economy to improve the culture of industry 4.0: A study on features, implementation and challenges. Green Technol. Sustain. 2024 , 2 , 100083. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kagermann, H.; Lukas, W.; Wahlster, W. Industrie 4.0—Mit dem Internet der Dinge auf dem Weg zur 4. Industriellen Revolution. VDI Nachrichten No. 13. 2011. Available online: https://www.ingenieur.de/technik/fachbereiche/produktion/industrie-40-mit-internet-dinge-weg-4-industriellen-revolution (accessed on 21 February 2024).
• Kagermann, H.; Anderl, R.; Gausemeier, J.; Schuh, G.; Wahlster, W. Industrie 4.0 im Globalen Kontext ; Herbert Utz Verlag: München, Germany, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hankel, M. Entwicklung von smarten Produkten. In Industrie 4.0 Potentiale Erkennen und Umsetzen ; Schulz, T., Ed.; Vogel Business Media GmbH & Co.: Würzburg, Germany, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Scheer, A.-W. Unternehmung 4.0: Vom Disruptiven Geschäftsmodell zur Automatisierung der Geschäftsprozesse ; Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brecher, C.; Herfs, W.; Özdemir, D.; Obdenbusch, M.; Nittinger, J.; Wellmann, F.; Königs, M.; Krella, C.; Sittig, S. Die vernetze Werkzeugmaschine. In Handbuch Industrie 4.0 ; Reinhart, G., Ed.; Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co.: Munich, Germany, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Niebauer, J.; Riemath, A. Wandel des klassischen Büroarbeitsplatzes. In Industrie 4.0 Wie Cyber-Physische Systeme die Arbeitswelt Verändern ; Andelfinger, V.P., Hänisch, T., Eds.; Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Stock, T.; Seliger, G. Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 13th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing—Decoupling Growth from Resource Use, Bihn Duong, Vietnam, 16–18 September 2015; pp. 536–541. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kunju, F.F.K.; Naveed, N.; Anwar, M.N.; Haq, M.I.U. Production and maintenance in industries: Impact of industry 4.0. Ind. Robot Int. J. Robot. Res. Appl. 2022 , 49 , 461–475. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Suleiman, Z.; Shaikholla, S.; Dikhanbayeva, D.; Shehab, E.; Turkyilmaz, A. Industry 4.0: Clustering of concepts and characteristics. Cogent Eng. 2022 , 9 , 2034264. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ching, N.T.; Ghobakhloo, M.; Iranmanesh, M.; Maroufkhani, P.; Asadi, S. Industry 4.0 applications for sustainable manufacturing: A systematic literature review and a roadmap to sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 334 , 130133. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bauernhansl, T. Die Entwicklungsstufen der Digitalen Transformation. In Handbuch Industrie 4.0: Band 1: Produktion ; Bauernhansl, T., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 3–12. [ Google Scholar ]
• Babel, W. IoT und Industrie 4.0—Zusammenhänge. In Internet of Things und Industrie 4.0 ; Babel, W., Ed.; Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2023; pp. 15–20. [ Google Scholar ]
• Drath, R. The digital Twin: The Evolution of a key concept of industry 4.0. visIT 2018 , 19 , 6–7. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sauer, O. The digital twin—A key technology for Industrie 4.0. visIT 2018 , 19 , 8–9. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ovtcharova, J.; Grethler, M. Beyond the digital twin—Making analytics come alive. visIT 2018 , 19 , 4–5. [ Google Scholar ]
• Siepmann, D. Industrie 4.0—Struktur und Historie. In Einführung und Umsetzung von Industrie 4.0 ; Roth, A., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 17–34. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gill, H. From Vision to Reality: Cyber-Physical Systems. In Proceedings of the HCSS National Workshop on New Research Directions for High Confidence Transportation CPS: Automotive, Aviation, and Rail, Vienna, Australia, 18–20 November 2008. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee, E.A.; Seshia, S.A. Introduction to Embedded Systems—A Cyber-Physical Systems Approach. 2011. Available online: https://ptolemy.berkeley.edu/books/leeseshia/ (accessed on 21 February 2024).
• Schlick, J.; Stephan, P.; Loskyll, M.; Lappe, D. Industrie 4.0 in der praktischen Anwendung. In Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik ; Bauernhansl, T., ten Hompel, M., Vogel-Heuser, B., Eds.; Springer Vieweg: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2014; pp. 57–84. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sinsel, A. Das Internet der Dinge in der Produktion ; Springer: Weingarten, Germany, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Atzori, L.; Iera, A.; Morabito, G. The Internet of Things: A survey. Comput. Netw. 2010 , 54 , 2787–2805. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Obukhova, A.; Merzlyakova, E.; Ershova, I.; Karakulina, K. Introduction of digital technologies in the enterprise. E3S Web Conf. 2020 , 159 , 04004. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Demartini, M.; Evans, S.; Tonelli, F. Digitalization Technologies for Industrial Sustainability. Procedia Manuf. 2019 , 33 , 264–271. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• VDI 2206. VDI 2206 Entwicklungsmethodik für Mechatronische Systeme ; Beuth Verlag GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gausemeier, J.; Czaja, A.; Dülme, C. Innovationspotentiale auf dem Weg zu Industrie 4.0 ; Universität Paderborn, Heinz Nixdorf Institut: Paderborn, Germany, 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• Acatech. Umsetzungsstrategie Industrie 4.0 Ergebnisbericht der Plattform Industrie 4.0 ; Acatech: Munich, Germany, 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lu, Y. The Current Status and Developing Trends of Industry 4.0: A Review. Inf. Syst. Front. 2021 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Voegele, A.A.; Sommer, L. Kosten—Und Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung für Ingenieure ; Carl Hanser Verlag: München, Germany, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development ; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [ Google Scholar ]
• The United Nations. Sustainable Development: The 17 Goals. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 18 April 2022).
• Henriques, A.; Richardson, J. The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add up? Earthscan: London, UK, 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Vereinte Nationen. Transformation unserer Welt: Die Agenda 2030 für nachhaltige Entwicklung. In UN Generalversammlung Siebzigste Tagung ; Vereinte Nationen: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sendroiu, C.; Roman, A.G.; Roman, C. Increasing the practical value of accounting information in the machine building industry applying the standard—Cost method. Metal. Int. 2007 , 12 , 35–39. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chacko, G. Valuation: Methods and Models in Applied Corporate Finance ; Pearson Education: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Commission. Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability, International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD). In Handbook: General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment ; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dillman, K.J.; Árnadóttir, Á.; Heinonen, J.; Czepkiewicz, M.; Davíðsdóttir, B. Review and Meta-Analysis of EVs: Embodied Emissions and Environmental Breakeven. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 9390. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hesser, F.; Wohner, B.; Meints, T.; Stern, T.; Windsperger, A. Integration of LCA in R&D by applying the concept of payback period: Case study of a modified multilayer wood parquet. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2017 , 22 , 307–316. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fetner, H.; Miller, S.A. Environmental payback periods of reusable alternatives to single-use plastic kitchenware products. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2021 , 26 , 1521–1537. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fleischer, G. Der ökologische break-even-point für das Recycling. Abfallwirtsch. J. 1993 , 3 , 209–215. [ Google Scholar ]
• Caiado, R.G.G.; De Freitas Dias, R.; Mattos, L.V.; Quelhas, O.L.G.; Filho, W.L. Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency—A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2017 , 165 , 890–904. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kicherer, A.; Schaltegger, S.; Tschochohei, H.; Pozo, B.F. Eco-efficiency. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2006 , 12 , 537–543. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lueddeckens, S. A review on the handling of discounting in eco-efficiency analysis. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2022 , 25 , 3–20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Deutscher Bundestag. Abschlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission „Schutz des Menschen und der Umwelt—Ziele und Rahmenbedingungen einer Nachhaltig Zukunftsverträglichen Entwicklung“ (No. Sachgebiet 1101) ; Deutscher Bundestag 13. Wahlperiode: Berlin, Germany, 1998.
• Beier, G.; Ullrich, A.; Niehoff, S.; Reißig, M.; Habich, M. Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes—A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 259 , 120856. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mengist, W.; Soromessa, T.; Legese, G. Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX 2020 , 7 , 100777. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int. J. Surg. 2021 , 88 , 105906. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bonilla, S.H.; Silva, H.R.O.; Terra da Silva, M.; Gonçalves, R.F.; Sacomano, J.B. Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges. Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 3740. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Burggräf, P.; Dannapfel, M.; Bertling, M.; Xu, T. Return on CPS (RoCPS): An Evaluation Model to Assess the Cost Effectiveness of Cyber-Physical Systems for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. In Proceedings of the PICMET ‘18: Technology Management for Interconnected World, Honolulu, HI, USA, 19–23 August 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Thiede, S. Environmental Sustainability of Cyber Physical Production Systems. In Proceedings of the 25th CIRP Life Cycle Engineering (LCE) Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 30 April–2 May 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Tu, M.; Lim, M.K.; Yang, M.-F. IoT-based production logistics and supply chain system—Part 2 IoT-based cyber-physical system: A framework and evaluation. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2018 , 118 , 96–125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jena, C.M.; Mishra, K.S.; Moharana, S.H. Application of Industry 4.0 to enhance sustainable manufacturing. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2020 , 39 , 13360. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, X.; Despeisse, M.; Johansson, B. Environmental Sustainability of Digitalization in Manufacturing: A Review. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 10298. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lukasik, K.; Stachowiak, T. Intelligent Management In The Age Of Industry 4.0—An Example of A Polymer Processing Company. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 2020 , 11 , 38–49. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Oláh, J.; Aburumman, N.; Popp, J.; Kahn, M.A.; Haddad, H.; Kitukutha, N. Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 4674. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sony, M. Pros and cons of implementing Industry 4.0 for the organizations: A review and synthesis of evidence. Prod. Manuf. Res. 2020 , 8 , 244–272. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vrchota, J.; Pech, M.; Rolínek, L.; Bednár, J. Sustainability Outcomes of Green Processes in Relation to Industry 4.0 in Manufacturing: Systematic Review. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 5968. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Badakhshan, E.; Ball, P. Reviewing the Application of Data Driven Digital Twins in Manufacturing Systems: A Business and Management Perspective. In Proceedings of the IFIP WG 5.7 International Conference, APMS, Nantes, France, 5–9 September 2021; Rannenberg, K., Dolgui, A., Lemoine, D., Romero, D., Bernard, A., von Cieminski, G., Eds.; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 256–265. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bamunuarachchi, D.; Georgakopoulos, D.; Banerjee, A.; Jayaraman, P.P. Digital Twins Supporting Efficient Digital Industrial Transformation. Sensors 2021 , 21 , 6829. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pater, J.; Stadnicka, D. Towards Digital Twins Development and Implementation to Support Sustainability—Systematic Literature Review. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 2021 , 12 , 63–73. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jamwal, A.; Agrawal, R.; Sharma, M.; Giallanza, A. Industry 4.0 Technologies for Manufacturing Sustainability: A Systematic Review and Future Research Directions. Appl. Sci. 2021 , 11 , 5725. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rogall, C.; Mennenga, M.; Herrmann, C.; Thiede, S. Systematic Development of Sustainability-Oriented Cyber-Physical Production Systems. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 2080. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Aigner, F.J.; Kühnl, M.; Castellani, F.; Greßmann, A.; Aigner, J.; Gyenge, P.; Herrmann, C.; Abraham, T.; Rogall, C.; Arafat, R. Ökologische und Ökonomische Bewertung des Ressourcenaufwandes: Industrie-4.0-Retrofit-Maßnahmen an Werkzeugmaschinen ; VDI Zentrum Ressourceneffizienz GmbH (VDI ZRE): Berlin, Germany, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jia, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhao, S. A review of deep learning-based approaches for defect detection in smart manufacturing. J. Opt. 2023 , 53 , 1345–1351. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sommer, M.; Stjepandić, J.; Stobrawa, S.; von Soden, M. Automated generation of digital twin for a built environment using scan and object detection as input for production planning. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2023 , 33 , 100462. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ivanov, D. Design and deployment of sustainable recovery strategies in the supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2023 , 183 , 109444. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kazemi, Z.; Rask, J.K.; Gomes, C.; Yildiz, E.; Larsen, P.G. Movable factory—A systematic literature review of concepts, requirements, applications, and gaps. J. Manuf. Syst. 2023 , 69 , 189–207. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zizic, M.C.; Mladineo, M.; Gjeldum, N.; Celent, L. From Industry 4.0 towards Industry 5.0: A Review and Analysis of Paradigm Shift for the People, Organization and Technology. Energies 2022 , 15 , 5221. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• da Silva, F.S.T.; da Costa, C.A.; Crovato, C.D.P.; Righi, R.d.R. Looking at energy through the lens of Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review of concerns and challenges. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020 , 143 , 106426. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hein-Pensel, F.; Winkler, H.; Brückner, A.; Wölke, M.; Jabs, I.; Mayan, I.J.; Kirschenbaum, A.; Friedrich, J.; Zinke-Wehlmann, C. Maturity assessment for Industry 5.0: A review of existing maturity models. J. Manuf. Syst. 2023 , 66 , 200–210. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Machado, C.G.; Winroth, M.P.; Ribeiro Da Silva, E.H.D. Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: An emerging research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020 , 58 , 1462–1484. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Tomaschko, F.; Reichelt, L.; Krommes, S. Digitalisation of Manufacturing Systems: A Literature Review of Approaches to Assess the Sustainability of Digitalisation Technologies in Production Systems. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 6275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156275

Tomaschko F, Reichelt L, Krommes S. Digitalisation of Manufacturing Systems: A Literature Review of Approaches to Assess the Sustainability of Digitalisation Technologies in Production Systems. Sustainability . 2024; 16(15):6275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156275

Tomaschko, Florian, Lukas Reichelt, and Sandra Krommes. 2024. "Digitalisation of Manufacturing Systems: A Literature Review of Approaches to Assess the Sustainability of Digitalisation Technologies in Production Systems" Sustainability 16, no. 15: 6275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156275

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Writing a Literature Review

Jan 02, 2020

100 likes | 126 Views

Writing a Literature Review. General Guidelines to Writing a Literature Review. Introduce the literature review by pointing out the major research topic that will be discussed

Share Presentation

• research question
• specific order
• general order
• research project
• solution order organize

Presentation Transcript

General Guidelines to Writing a Literature Review • Introduce the literature review by pointing out the major research topic that will be discussed • Identify the broad problem area but don’t be too global (for example, discussing the history of education when the topic is on specific instructional strategy) • Discuss the general importance of your topic for those in your field

General Guidelines to Writing a Literature Review • Don’t attempt to cover everything written on your topic • You will need to pick out the research most relevant to the topic you are studying • You will use the studies in your literature review as “evidence” that your research question is an important one

General Guidelines to Writing a Literature Review • It is important to cover research relevant to all the variables being studied. • Research that explains the relationship between these variables is a top priority. • You will need to plan how you will structure your literature review and write from this plan.

Organizing Your Literature Review • Topical Order—organize by main topics or issues; emphasize the relationship of the issues to the main “problem” • Chronological Order—organize the literature by the dates the research was published • Problem-Cause-Solution Order—Organize the review so that it moves from the problem to the solution

Organizing Your Literature Review • General-to-Specific Order—(Also called the funnel approach) Examine broad-based research first and then focus on specific studies that relate to the topic • Specific-to-General Order—Try to make discuss specific research studies so conclusions can be drawn

Literature Review • After reviewing the literature, summarize what has been done, what has not been done, and what needs to be done • Remember you are arguing your point of why your study is important! • Then pose a formal research question or state a hypothesis—be sure this is clearly linked to your literature review

Literature Review • All sources cited in the literature review should be listed in the references • To sum, a literature review should include introduction, summary and critique of journal articles, justifications for your research project and the hypothesis for your research project

Common Errors Made in Lit Reviews • Review isn’t logically organized • Review isn’t focused on most important facets of the study • Review doesn’t relate literature to the study • Too few references or outdated references cited • Review isn’t written in author’s own words • Review reads like a series of disjointed summaries • Review doesn’t argue a point • Recent references are omitted

Writing the Literature Review Plagiarism includes (Galvan, pg. 89): • Using another writer’s words without proper citation • Using another writer’s ideas without proper citation • Citing a source but reproducing the exact word without quotation marks • Borrowing the structure of another author’s phrases/sentences without giving the source • Borrowing all or part of another student’s paper • Using paper-writing service or having a friend write the paper

• More by User

WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW

WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW. Lyabwene Mtahabwa & Issa Danjun Ying 20th Nov. 2007. Discussion. What are the features of a good-quality literature review?. Features. Descriptive Critical Up-to-date Comprehensive Well-established knowledge gap. Principles. Focus Scope Clarity.

730 views • 12 slides

Dr. Chris Staff University of Malta Department of Intelligent Computer Systems [email protected]. Writing a Literature Review. Overview. Report Writing (for ICT) The purpose of a report Chapter/Section Overview Writing a Literature Review How to read efficiently:-)

1.82k views • 49 slides

Conducting a Literature Search and Writing a Literature Review

Conducting a Literature Search and Writing a Literature Review. Lisa Eblen, MLIS, AHIP Research Symposium Naval Hospital Pensacola September 2011. Why does a CID Research Proposal require a literature search and review ?. Define the background for the research project

549 views • 31 slides

Writing a Literature Review. Evaluating and describing other people’s work. What is a literature review? How do I decide what goes where? Learning From Secondary Research Evaluating Primary Research Additional information. 1: What is a literature review?. What is a literature review?.

1.14k views • 33 slides

Guidelines for writing a literature review

Guidelines for writing a literature review. Samuel T. Ramos, Jr. MCM Faculty of Arts and Letters Department of Communication and Media Studies University of Sto . Tomas. What is a literature review?.

378 views • 18 slides

Writing a Literature Review. 05-771 HCI Process and Theory Missy Harvey Computer Science Librarian [email protected] October 2010. What is a Literature Review?. A critical, analytical summary and synthesis of the current knowledge of a topic

998 views • 46 slides

Literature Review Writing Service

literaturereviewwritingservice.com. If you need to get the best literature review writing service you should only visit our site literaturereviewwritingservice.com And our expert team will help you to achieve all your desires and requirements.

194 views • 8 slides

441 views • 10 slides

Writing a Literature Review. Wiser workshop 27 th January 2010. Overview. What is a literature review ? Information seeking Critical Reading Synthesis and structure Reflections on your literature review. What is a Literature Review?. According to Bell (1999, p90):

685 views • 19 slides

Writing a literature review

Writing a literature review. Researching Society and Culture 3 rd February 2014 Hannah Jones. What is a literature review?. Discusses relevant literature already published on a topic Relates this existing literature to the specific essay question

782 views • 14 slides

Writing a literature review. literature review. A literature review summarizes , interprets, and critically evaluates existing "literature" (or published material ) in order to establish current knowledge of a subject .

645 views • 13 slides

Writing the Literature Review

Writing the Literature Review. Lourdes Villarreal, Ph.D. Writing Center Claremont Graduate University. Presentation Outline. Questions to Consider Resources Professor/Department /School Resources Expert librarians/library materials Writing Center Handbooks Strategies

515 views • 32 slides

Writing the Literature Review. Writing in CSD. What is a Lit Review?. As the first step in the research process, the literature review provides an organized review of the main ideas, theories, and findings related to a topic.

316 views • 14 slides

Critical papers of any sort are usually difficult, and that is because you need to thoroughly read over other material and provide a solid review of it. This is not easy, and many people struggle with this assignment because they find it hard to follow the protocol. This assignment is often given in social sciences and other experiment-driven subjects, but these can also pop up in liberal studies such as English. No matter what class you need to do a literature review for, you do not want to get behind, and if you do then you could find yourself in a lot of trouble. Our literature review writing service is here so that you don’t have to worry about anything at a time, and o expert writers are committed to helping you out.

320 views • 6 slides

Writing the Literature Review. Source: Effective Writing Center, University of Maryland. What the Literature Review IS NOT?. Not an essay/paper Not state or prove your main points

435 views • 18 slides

Conducting a Literature Search and Writing a Literature Review. Lisa Eblen, MLIS, AHIP Research Symposium 16 November 2011. Why does a CID Research Proposal require a literature search and review ?. Define the background for the research project Present evidence that the work is original

725 views • 30 slides

Writing A Literature Review

Writing A Literature Review. Structure of review articles. Literature reviews are in reality a type of research Should conform to the anatomy of a typical scholarly article Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion References. Structure of literature review.

903 views • 20 slides

Researching & Writing a Literature Review

Researching & Writing a Literature Review . NCSU Libraries. Expectations of graduate students. Grad students have different backgrounds Not every grad student has done research Not everyone has experience reading the literature. No problem. You are learning to ask questions

443 views • 30 slides

Writing a literature review. Dr Cheryl Lange. Integral aspects of academic work. There are a number of stages in writing a literature review. Survey the literature Develop an understanding of the issues Subject your understanding to critical thinking processes

452 views • 13 slides

Writing Dissertation Literature Review

Before writing dissertation literature review, you have to consider the following points so that you donu2019t skip anything in the process. You need to collect some relevant literature reviews and get to know about themes that have been researching. This will allow you to open windows in order to frame your kind of research.

269 views • 25 slides

Writing a Literature Review. Dr. Jan van Aalst The University of Hong Kong. The research process A simple model. Identifying the problem Review the literature Design the study Collect the data Analyze the data Draw conclusions Identify implications. In practice It ’ s not this linear.

148 views • 11 slides

Researching & Writing a Literature Review . Karen Ciccone NCSU Libraries. In being asked to write a literature review, you may hear the following phrases: “What does the literature show us?” “Connect your ideas to the literature .” “Survey the literature on the topic.”

282 views • 26 slides