against animal testing persuasive speech

Cruelty Free International

subtitle: Working to create a world where no animals suffer in a laboratory

breadcrumb navigation:

• About Animal Testing /
• current page Arguments against animal testing

Arguments against animal testing

Animal experiments are cruel, unreliable, and even dangerous

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective. Animals do not naturally get many of the diseases that humans do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease or schizophrenia. Instead, signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in laboratories in an attempt to mimic the human disease. Yet, such experiments belittle the complexity of human conditions which are affected by wide-ranging variables such as genetics, socio-economic factors, deeply-rooted psychological issues and different personal experiences.

It is not surprising to find that treatments showing “promise” in animals rarely work in humans.  Not only are time, money and animals’ lives being wasted (with a huge amount of suffering), but effective treatments are being mistakenly discarded and harmful treatments are getting through. The support for animal testing is based largely on anecdote and is not backed up, we believe, by the scientific evidence that is out there.

Despite many decades of studying cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, stroke and AIDS in animals, none of these conditions have reliable and fully effective cures and some don’t even have effective treatments.

The history of cancer research has been the history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply didn’t work in human beings.

Unreliable animal testing

• 92% of drugs fail in human clinical trials despite appearing safe and effective in animal tests, often on safety grounds or because they do not work.
• Urology drugs have the lowest success rate (only 4% are approved after entering clinical trials) followed by heart drugs (5% success rate), cancer drugs (5% success rate) and neurology drugs (6% success rate).
• Our research has shown that using dogs, rats, mice and rabbits to test whether or not a drug will be safe for humans provides statistically little useful insight. Our study also revealed that drug tests on monkeys are just as poor as those using any other species in predicting the effects on humans.
• A recent study found that out of 93 dangerous drug side effects, only 19% could have been predicted by animal tests.
• Another study showed that over 1,000 potential stroke treatments have been “successful” in animal tests, but of the approximately 10% that progressed to human trials, none worked sufficiently well in humans.
• One review of 101 high impact discoveries based on basic animal experiments found that only 5% resulted in approved treatments within 20 years. More recently, we conducted an analysis of 27 key animal-based ‘breakthroughs ’ that had been reported by the UK press 25 years earlier. Mirroring the earlier study, we found only one of the 27 “breakthroughs” had been realised in humans, and that was subject to several caveats.

Dangerous animal testing

• Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around 140,000 heart attacks and strokes and 60,000 deaths worldwide.
• Human volunteers testing a new monoclonal antibody treatment (TGN1412) at Northwick Park Hospital, UK, in 2006 suffered a severe immune reaction and nearly died. Testing on monkeys at 500 times the dose given to the volunteers totally failed to predict the dangerous side effects.
• A drug trial in France resulted in the death of one volunteer and left four others severely brain damaged in 2016. The drug, which was intended to treat a wide range of conditions including anxiety and Parkinson’s disease, was tested in four different species of animals (mice, rats, dogs and monkeys) before being given to humans.
• A clinical trial of Hepatitis B drug fialuridine had to be stopped because it caused severe liver damage in seven patients, five of whom died. It had been tested on animals first.

Animals are different

• Animals do not get many of the diseases we do, such as Parkinson’s disease, major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, HIV or schizophrenia.
• An analysis of over 100 mouse cell types found that only 50% of the DNA responsible for regulating genes in mice could be matched with human DNA.
• The most commonly used species of monkey to test drug safety (Cynomolgous macaque monkeys) is resistant to doses of paracetamol (acetaminophen) that would be deadly in humans.
• Chocolate, grapes, raisins, avocados and macadamia nuts are harmless in humans but toxic to dogs.
• Aspirin is toxic to many animals and would not be on our pharmacy shelves if it had been tested according to current animal testing standards.

The science relating to animal experiments can be extremely complicated and views often differ. What appears on this website represents Cruelty Free International expert opinion, based on a thorough assessment of the evidence.

FIND OUT MORE ABOUT ANIMAL TESTING

Alternatives to animal tests are often cheaper, quicker and more effective.

Alternatives to animal testing

subtitle: Alternatives to animal tests are often cheaper, quicker and more effective.

Science Page

Established in 1898, Cruelty Free International is firmly rooted in the early social justice movement and has a long and inspiring history.

Our History

subtitle: Established in 1898, Cruelty Free International is firmly rooted in the early social justice movement and has a long and inspiring history.

Millions of animals are used and killed in the name of progress every year.

Facts and figures on animal testing

subtitle: Millions of animals are used and killed in the name of progress every year.

Animals used in laboratories are deliberately harmed, not for their own good, and are usually killed at the end of the experiment.

What is animal testing?

subtitle: Animals used in laboratories are deliberately harmed, not for their own good, and are usually killed at the end of the experiment.

Animal testing is carried out in a wide range of areas, including biological research, and testing medicines and chemicals.

Types of animal testing

subtitle: Animal testing is carried out in a wide range of areas, including biological research, and testing medicines and chemicals.

Science Publications

• September 3 Colorguard 24'-25'!
• September 3 FCCLA Goes to Korea!
• August 29 Honoria Surprise!
• August 29 EHS Revolution!
• August 27 New Door Rule!
• June 6 Meet Your New B&G Captain, Genesis Lopez
• June 5 A successful year for Culture Circle
• June 5 Advice from upperclass men to under class men!
• June 5 Miami High Basketball is Back!
• June 3 The Oedipus Complex was wrong
• June 3 My Freshman Year
• June 3 Eastern Orthodoxy
• June 3 Boys Volleyball Summary
• May 30 The Magic of The Owl House
• May 30 SGA 2023-2024

Miami High News

A speech against animal testing.

By Eileen Hernandez , 12th Grade November 27, 2018

Everyone can easily and doubtlessly say that they love animals and are against animal abuse. However, if you buy cosmetics, fragrances, and other products whose companies test on animals, you are doing the opposite of what you preach. You would not believe the abundance of companies that test on animals. The purpose for this is to determine whether ingredients are safe before allowing it on the market. But, despite that it is not required by law in the U.S., animal testing is still commonly used today. I am not going to explain everything that goes on in animal testing because I would be standing here forever. But, I will emphasize how we can each contribute to make a change and put an end to this living nightmare.

Animal testing is more agonizing than you think. It is not simply putting lipstick on a bunny and spraying cologne on a mouse. According to Cruelty Free International, over 115 million animals are used for animal testing worldwide every year. These innocent animals include bunnies, guinea pigs, mice, and monkeys. These innocent animals are subjected to a plethora of cruel and unimaginable experiments for humans’ benefit. These innocent animals have only known a short life of suffering, terror, and loneliness before they are killed and are just another number in the statistics of murders. Some of these tests include forced feeding, forced inhalation, infliction of burns and wounds, dripping of chemicals in eyes, and endless more unthinkable experiments. At the end of a test, animals are simply killed, either by suffocation, neck-breaking, or decapitation. I don’t even want to tell you that dogs and cats are used for experiments too. Beagles are actually a common subject because of their calm and obedient nature; an exploitation of purity. Can you imagine your own pets in these laboratories? And if your pets were being tested on, would you still buy from companies that test on animals? If you wouldn’t force an animal to drink chemicals, then you shouldn’t support companies that do. The sad part is, while animal abuse is generally considered a crime in the U.S., these protective laws don’t apply to laboratory animals. This is absolutely senseless because all animals experience pain and abuse has no justification.

At this point, animal testing for cosmetics is unnecessary. It is outdated, unreliable, and there are numerous alternatives for it. With over 7,000 ingredients that are already proven safe, companies can choose from those to create products, rather than continue to harm and murder animals to find new ingredients. Technology has also brought endless possibilities for research, therefore if companies want to continue their innovations, they can use alternatives such as the popular in-vitro testing. The introduction of this method was a heaven-sent miracle for the poor laboratory animals – they were a step closer to freedom and a chance at life. This substitute uses artificial human cells, tissues, and skin for testing; leading to more accurate and reliable results, and less waste of money. We shouldn’t rely on animal testing because humans are a completely unique species, which prevents valid results. This is proven to be true in cancer research; despite successfully curing mice of cancer for decades, we still have not found one for humans, and many cases of drugs proven harmless for animals have been detrimental for humans, such as the sleeping pill thalidomide which caused birth defects, and the arthritis drug Vioxx that brought thousands of deadly heart attacks. This is why we must support ethical beauty companies that use animal testing alternatives.

So, how can you, a mere high school student, possibly contribute to ending this horror? You can vote with your money. That is, shopping cruelty-free. There are endless great brands of cruelty-free products to consider, from both mainstream and independent companies. Money is the Achilles’ heel of cosmetic companies; if masses of people boycott companies that test on animals, they would surely consider going cruelty-free to stabilize or improve their business. The bright side of all this is that entirely banning animal testing is not at all impossible. Governments worldwide are ending this practice, such as The European Union, Israel, India, Norway, Switzerland, South Korea, and New Zealand, therefore the U.S. should take note of this. We must be the suffering animals’ voices and let all the greedy cosmetic companies know that this must stop. These animals are currently confined in their cages, desperately waiting for us. Please educate yourself on what goes on behind closed doors of cosmetic industries, and persuade your family, friends, and peers to do the same. Remember that animals were put in this world with us, not for us. Together, we will march towards a new and compassionate era, where we’ll look back at this issue and condemn its initial existence.

By Fatima Reyna , Editor

September 3, 2024

    Color Guard has a busy schedule this year. Co-Captain Addis Smith states, “Band...

By Miguel Arredondo , Staff Writer

February 28, 2024

        Miami High’s wrestling team kicked off their season in the first...

By Joshua Guerrero , Staff Writer

   Boys' basketball coach Mr. Humberto “Tico” Govea reports that the team’s...

        Junior Romari Robinson is a star basketball...

• Girls Volleyball Team December 20, 2023
• JV Basketball Looks Forward To A Good Season October 20, 2023
• Girls Flag Football Team Journey to Success October 20, 2023

Comments (4)

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Devon Michaelson • May 18, 2022 at 11:41 am

I love this speech and I agree with everything on it.

Vilte • Sep 27, 2021 at 6:00 am

I loved this såecch very m uch! I really agree with what you said and i loved!!!!! the ending line. ANIMALS ANR NOT MADE FOR US. I did copy this text and used in my own english speecb about animal testing, Thank you very much<3 i failed tho, might be your fault. Whats your neame?

Eli • May 18, 2022 at 11:45 am

WE ARE ANIMALS

Amanda • Feb 21, 2023 at 7:51 pm

Was this speech delivered to the school

onlinespeechwriting.com

This webpage was generated by the domain owner using Sedo Domain Parking . Disclaimer: Sedo maintains no relationship with third party advertisers. Reference to any specific service or trade mark is not controlled by Sedo nor does it constitute or imply its association, endorsement or recommendation.

How to write a Sample Speech against Animal Testing

• Uncategorized

Introduction When writing a Sample Speech against Animal Testing, there are several factors to consider. These include the audience, purpose, research, main points, structure, language, tone, and delivery. By taking these factors into account, you can create a persuasive and impactful speech that raises awareness about the ethical considerations and ineffectiveness of animal testing. Audience One of the key factors to consider when writing a Sample Speech against Animal Testing is the audience. The age, interests, and knowledge of your audience can greatly influence the tone, language, and content of your speech. For instance, a speech to high school students may need to use simpler language and more relatable examples than a speech to scientists or policymakers. Additionally, understanding the interests of your audience can help you tailor your speech to their specific concerns. For example, animal rights activists may be more concerned with the ethical implications of animal testing, while medical professionals may be more interested in the effectiveness of alternative methods. Finally, knowledge level is also an important consideration. If your audience is not familiar with the topic of animal testing, you may need to provide more background information and explanations. Conversely, if your audience is already knowledgeable about the topic, you can delve deeper into the issues and present more complex arguments. By taking the time to understand your audience, you can create a speech that is engaging, relevant, and persuasive. Purpose Before writing a Sample Speech against Animal Testing, it is important to clarify the purpose of the speech. There are different purposes that a speech can serve, such as persuading the audience to change their behavior or beliefs, or raising awareness about the issue. If your purpose is to persuade your audience, you may want to focus on presenting arguments and evidence that will convince them to take action. For example, you may present research that shows that animal testing is not an accurate predictor of human response, or that alternative methods are more effective and ethical. On the other hand, if your purpose is to raise awareness, you may want to focus on providing information and educating your audience. This could include discussing the history and prevalence of animal testing, the animals that are commonly used in testing, and the different types of testing that are used. By clarifying the purpose of your speech, you can ensure that your arguments and evidence are focused and relevant, and that your speech is effective in achieving your goals. Research Thorough research is essential when writing a Sample Speech against Animal Testing. It is important to gather a wide range of information from credible sources, such as academic journals, books, and reputable organizations. This research can include the history of animal testing, current practices, and alternative methods that can be used instead of animal testing. When conducting research, it is important to be critical of your sources and to consider the bias of the author or organization. Look for sources that are objective and provide balanced information, rather than those that are overly emotional or one-sided. Additionally, it can be helpful to gather statistics and data to support your arguments. For example, you may look for information on the number of animals used in testing, the types of tests that are commonly performed, and the success rate of these tests in predicting human response. By conducting thorough research, you can ensure that your arguments are well-informed and evidence-based, making your speech more convincing and impactful. Main points When writing a Sample Speech against Animal Testing, it is important to decide on the main points that you want to make. These points should be focused and relevant to the topic, and should support the purpose and goals of your speech. One key area to consider is the ethical considerations of animal testing. This could include discussing the treatment of animals in laboratories, the impact of testing on their welfare and wellbeing, and the moral implications of using animals for scientific purposes. Another important point to make is the ineffectiveness of animal testing in predicting human response. This could involve presenting research that shows the limitations and drawbacks of animal testing, including the differences between animals and humans in terms of genetics, physiology, and behavior. Finally, you may want to discuss the availability of alternative methods that can be used instead of animal testing. These methods could include computer simulations, in vitro testing, and human-based research, and may be more accurate and effective than animal testing. By identifying these main points, you can create a speech that is well-structured and focused, and that effectively communicates your arguments and evidence to your audience. Structure To effectively convey your arguments and persuade your audience, it is important to structure your speech in a logical and coherent manner. A well-structured speech will allow your audience to follow your argument easily and stay engaged throughout. A common structure for a Sample Speech against Animal Testing is to use an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. In the introduction, you can grab your audience’s attention with a hook or interesting fact, and clearly state the purpose of your speech. In the body of your speech, you can present your main points in a logical and coherent order. It is important to clearly introduce and transition between each point, using evidence and examples to support your arguments. Finally, in the conclusion, you can summarize your main points and reiterate the importance of the topic. You can also provide a call to action, encouraging your audience to take action or change their beliefs or behaviors. By using a clear and effective structure, you can ensure that your speech is well-organized and easy to follow, making it more persuasive and impactful. Language Using clear and concise language is important when writing a Sample Speech against Animal Testing. Avoid using technical jargon and complex terms that may confuse or alienate your audience. Instead, use simple and straightforward language that is easy to understand. Using vivid examples and stories can also be an effective way to engage your audience and illustrate your points. For example, you could tell a story about a specific animal that was used in testing and the impact that it had on the animal’s life. This can help your audience to understand the emotional impact of animal testing and feel more invested in the issue. Another effective technique is to use analogies or metaphors to make complex ideas more accessible. For example, you could compare animal testing to using a broken compass for navigation – while it may provide some guidance, it is ultimately unreliable and can lead us in the wrong direction. By using clear and engaging language, you can ensure that your speech is accessible and relatable to your audience, making it more effective in achieving your goals. Tone When delivering a Sample Speech against Animal Testing, it is important to strike a tone that is appropriate for your audience and purpose. The tone you choose can have a significant impact on how your message is received, so it’s important to consider your audience and the goals of your speech. It’s important to avoid being too aggressive or confrontational in your tone, as this can turn off your audience and make them less receptive to your arguments. Instead, focus on being passionate and persuasive in your arguments, while also being respectful of those who may hold different views. Another important aspect of tone is to be authentic and sincere in your delivery. Speak from the heart and be genuine in your desire to make a difference and advocate for animal welfare. By choosing a tone that is appropriate for your audience and purpose, you can ensure that your message is well-received and that you are able to effectively convey your arguments and evidence. Delivery Delivery is an important aspect of giving a Sample Speech against Animal Testing. Practicing your speech beforehand can help you to become more comfortable with your material and fine-tune your delivery. When delivering your speech, pay attention to your tone, pace, and body language. Speak clearly and at an appropriate pace, and use pauses to emphasize important points. Use appropriate gestures and body language to convey your passion and conviction. Visual aids such as images, videos, or statistics can also enhance your presentation and make it more engaging for your audience. These can help to reinforce your arguments and make complex concepts more accessible. It’s also important to be aware of your audience’s reaction and adjust your delivery as needed. For example, if you notice your audience is becoming restless or disengaged, you may need to change your approach to re-engage them. By practicing your delivery and using appropriate visual aids, you can ensure that your Sample Speech against Animal Testing is engaging and effective in achieving your goals. FAQs

1. what should i consider when writing a speech against animal testing.

When writing a speech against animal testing, consider factors such as your audience, purpose, research, main points, structure, language, tone, and delivery.

2. What is the best way to engage my audience in a speech against animal testing?

Using vivid examples and stories, analogies, and visual aids such as images or videos can help to engage your audience and make your arguments more accessible.

3. How can I ensure that my speech against animal testing is effective?

Conduct thorough research on the topic, organize your main points in a logical and coherent manner, use clear and concise language, and practice your delivery to ensure that your message is well-received.

4. What is an appropriate tone for a speech against animal testing?

The tone of a speech against animal testing should be passionate and persuasive, while also being respectful and authentic. It’s important to avoid being too aggressive or confrontational in your tone.

5. What are some alternatives to animal testing that I can discuss in my speech?

Some alternatives to animal testing include in vitro testing, computer simulations, and human cell cultures. Conducting research into these alternatives and their effectiveness can strengthen your arguments against animal testing.

Total Assignment Help Incase, you are looking for an opportunity to work from home and earn big money. TotalAssignmenthelp Affiliate program is the best choice for you. 

Do visit : https://www.totalassignment.com/affiliate-program for more details

Total Assignment help is an  assignment help Online  service available in 9 countries. Our local operations span across Australia, US, UK, South east Asia and the Middle East. With extensive experience in academic writing, Total assignment help has a strong track record delivering quality writing at a nominal price that meet the unique needs of students in our local markets.

We have specialized network of highly trained writers, who can provide best possible assignment help solution for all your needs.  Next time you are looking for assignment help, make sure to give us a try.

Looking for Assignment Help from Top Experts ?

Get the best Assignment Help from leading experts from the field of academics with assured onetime, 100% plagiarism free and top Quality delivery.

Related posts

Understanding the difference between basic vs applied research with the aid of examples.

Examining How To Write The Perfect Hook For Your Assignment

Get Expert Advice On How To Develop Yourself As A Human Resource Practitioner

Leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

We need your support today

Independent journalism is more important than ever. Vox is here to explain this unprecedented election cycle and help you understand the larger stakes. We will break down where the candidates stand on major issues, from economic policy to immigration, foreign policy, criminal justice, and abortion. We’ll answer your biggest questions, and we’ll explain what matters — and why. This timely and essential task, however, is expensive to produce.

We rely on readers like you to fund our journalism. Will you support our work and become a Vox Member today?

• Future Perfect

Animal testing, explained

Is anything really “cruelty-free”?

by Celia Ford

It’s nearly impossible to go a day without benefitting from the suffering of animals. The ingredients in your toiletries and makeup; your medicine, vaccines, and implants; your cleaning supplies; the chemicals that helped grow your food — most of it was, at some point, tested on animals.

For centuries, the biological sciences have relied on animal testing. To figure out how a machine works, you need to disassemble it and check out its component parts. Understanding the living body, one of nature’s most complex and beautiful machines, is no different. Taking apart and fiddling with a toaster doesn’t hurt anyone, but dismantling a biological system certainly does.

Many scientists believe that experimenting on living animals is a necessary means of solving problems that affect both humans and animals. But these experiments often involve animals experiencing distress, whether from the side effects of an experimental drug, an intentionally inflicted illness, or simply their confined living situation. Some lucky lab animals get to spend their retirement in sanctuaries once they’re no longer needed. Most of the time, the animal dies, either as a direct consequence of the experiment or from euthanasia.

More often than not, animal research happens behind closed, locked, unmarked doors. That lack of transparency makes it difficult to know what to think about animal testing, and public opinion is tellingly divided. A 2018 Pew Research Center survey found that 47 percent of people in the US support the use of animals in scientific research, and 52 percent oppose it. Unlike climate change or reproductive health , where the parties are highly polarized, animal testing is one of few science-related policy issues where the attitudes of Republicans and Democrats are pretty similar: Both parties are split roughly 50-50.

Experimenting on animals places two seemingly good things — medical innovation and animal welfare — at odds. Even those who support animal research generally hold nuanced, conflicted beliefs about it, and questions about the nature and extent of animal testing are still hotly debated.

Inside this story

• What animal testing actually does
• Who is looking out for the welfare of animals
• The truth behind labels like “cruelty-free”
• The future of animal-free testing

Brands frequently mislead consumers about animal testing involving their products with vague labeling, and alternative research methods aren’t as broadly applicable as some activist organizations imply . Meanwhile, research facilities often ban employees from sharing photos of lab animals without institutional approval and rarely let the media observe experiments for themselves.

After spending six years as a neuroscience PhD student working in a lab with monkeys, I left academia with the impression that animal testing is neither as well-managed or justified as regulators claim, nor as malicious as others fear. Government agencies are starting to direct funding toward finding alternatives to animal testing, but the use of animals is deeply embedded in biological sciences.

A world without lab animals may be possible, but we don’t live in it yet. Here’s what’s actually going on.

What is animal testing?

Before humans invented microscopes, universities, or even paper, we were using animals for medical research. Over two millennia ago , ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle dissected dozens of animal species to better understand their anatomy and argued that studying their bodies could teach us a lot about our own biology. Over four centuries later, Galen of Pergamon , one of the most pivotal characters in Western medical history, performed public surgeries on animals ( especially monkeys ) for science, providing a spectacle that attracted curious audiences.

Today, animal experimentation is widespread and conducted far from the public eye. It falls under two broad, semi-overlapping umbrellas: biomedical research (which aims to understand, prevent, and treat diseases, as well as uncover fundamental information about how bodies work) and toxicology , or testing the effects of chemicals (including everything from toothpaste and makeup to pesticides) on living things.

Humans generally don’t want to be proverbial guinea pigs for new medicines or consumer products. We’d rather know that things are safe before we put them anywhere near our bodies. Companies, whether they deal in cosmetics or pharmaceuticals, also don’t want to be liable for poisoning their customers.

People can participate in experiments that might harm them, but historically, at best, such projects have been difficult to administer . At worst, they have involved illegal human experimentation that cast a long, dark shadow over the field of medical research.

The Tuskegee syphilis study , for example, put hundreds of poor Black men with untreated syphilis through decades of invasive tests in exchange for hot meals and basic medical treatment, just to see how the disease would progress if left untreated. Effective treatments became available during the study, but researchers withheld them. Once the experiment’s scandalous history was publicly disclosed in 1972 , the US government formalized basic ethical guidelines for human research and required Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to approve studies on humans.

Today, many questions — like What is the lethal dose of this new drug? and Does this new surgical technique actually work? — can’t ethically be asked regarding humans without first being tested on a nonhuman subject.

For a long time, animals were the only alternative to humans available. To figure out the lethal dose of a new drug, scientists can give increasingly large amounts of it to mice and see what it takes to kill them. To test whether a brain implant actually relieves Parkinson’s symptoms, scientists do brain surgery on monkeys . Without computational models or cell cultures sophisticated enough to mimic the complicated interactions between organs, the options have historically been to use animals as a proxy or to drop or scale back your planned research.

We can only guess how many animals are being used in scientific experiments worldwide. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) publishes official reports on animal research every year, but they only include animals protected by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), the federal law setting basic standards for the treatment and housing of certain farm animals and lab animals. The law covers dogs, cats, monkeys, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigs, rabbits, and sheep. In 2019, about 800,000 animals protected by AWA were used in research — 930,000, if you add those that lived in labs but were never included in a study.

Notably, the AWA doesn’t apply to mice and rats, which several studies estimate account for somewhere between 93 and 99 percent of all lab animals in the US. The AWA also excludes invertebrates like flies, worms, fish, and cephalopods like octopuses, whose intelligence makes them intriguing neuroscience subjects. The EU, which counts all vertebrates used in experiments, tallied about 10.6 million animals used in 2017. It’s harder to pin down a number in the US. Depending on who you ask , there might be 10 million rodents subjected to scientific experiments annually, or there might be 111 million. (Either way, it’s more than three times the number of rats in New York City.)

Rodents make appealing animal models for many scientists because they’re smart enough to learn simple tasks but are still socially regarded as pests; those who kill rats for a living don’t face the same kind of backlash as someone who, say, boasts about shooting a puppy . Nearly all mouse genes share functions with human genes, so at a basic level, their biology resembles ours. Mice only live for a year or two, enabling scientists to study things like chronic disease progression without waiting an entire human lifespan. And scientists can genetically alter mice in countless ways, knocking out or adding DNA to express diseases or make certain cell types glow under a microscope.

In some cases, a research question requires invasively studying a full, living biological system, but the gap between mice and humans is too wide. The USDA reported that 68,257 monkeys were used in 2019 to study subjects like SARS-CoV-2 , Parkinson’s disease , and HIV , where physiological and cognitive similarity to humans was a priority. Those primates were mostly macaques and marmosets; the use of chimpanzees (our closest ape relative) is now banned in many countries , including the US .

But monkey research may not be viable much longer. While hundreds of monkey experiments are being funded by the NIH , there aren’t enough long-tailed macaques to go around. In a desperate attempt to keep up with skyrocketing demand, thousands of wild-caught monkeys are illegally imported to US research institutions from countries like Cambodia. Two years ago, the long-tailed macaque was listed as endangered for the first time. PETA petitioned the US government to protect the species under the Endangered Species Act , which could end their use in research altogether, but the request has yet to be approved. Most people are uncomfortable with the idea of experimenting on an animal so similar to us, including some of the scientists who do it. However, many scientists and policymakers agree that we still don’t have non-animal alternatives that can answer tough research questions involving interactions between organs. Researchers worry that the looming primate shortage in the US — engendered by transportation restrictions and therapeutic testing requirements and exacerbated by pandemic-era demands — will limit our ability to respond to public health emergencies.

Monkeys are traditionally recognized as the only nonhuman animals that react to drugs with human-specific targets, meaning that in some cases, their body’s reactions could uniquely predict whether a drug will be safe and effective for humans. During the first years of the Covid-19 pandemic, monkeys were considered so crucial to SARS-CoV-2 research that when the rhesus macaque supply dried up, scientists didn’t turn to cell cultures or computer models — they just looked for different monkeys .

You might not agree that this research justifies the nonconsensual use of highly intelligent animals; many don’t, for both ethical and scientific reasons. But it’s happening, and if you’ve been vaccinated or take medications, you’ve likely benefited from it.

Who’s looking out for the welfare of lab animals?

The regulatory framework surrounding animal research is a tangled web of acronyms, committees, and working groups. Since the Animal Welfare Act was passed in 1966, the USDA has been in charge of enforcing it through inspections and annual reports.

In theory, researchers have to justify the use of animals in their work. To conduct an animal experiment, scientists in the US go through a review process with their Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), which decides whether animals are “necessary” and whether steps are being taken to minimize their pain.

IACUCs are mostly comprised of researchers who experiment on animals and the veterinarians who help them, strongly biasing committees toward approving animal experiments. In the US and elsewhere, scientists are subtly incentivized to use animals, even when they aren’t actually necessary. Academic journals tend to preferentially publish work with animal methods , and academic careers hinge on accumulating publications . These norms seep into the labs where animal experiments are performed. New animal researchers often receive explicit instructions on how to steer clear of animal rights activists, according to several researchers I spoke with while working as a neuroscientist (as well as my own experience).

This can make holding institutions accountable for animal welfare violations challenging. While researchers are required to report information about animals in their facilities, like what medical procedures they’ve received and when they’ve been fed, they are told to keep these reports “ minimal, but complete .” In other words: Avoid including photos, videos, or graphic descriptions that could enrage activists or entice the media.

There also isn’t a clear legal definition for “animal cruelty” in research settings beyond violations of the basic standards outlined by the Animal Welfare Act. This leaves some room for interpretation about what is acceptable and what would constitute illegal treatment. The EU’s Directive 2010/63/EU , its equivalent of the Animal Welfare Act, emphasizes that animals should only be used if there are no other options and if the potential benefits of the research outweigh the animals’ suffering.

This cost-benefit analysis is subjective. For example, a team of immunologists studying cancer in mice would probably say that the potential public health benefits of their work justify harming mice. A team of science policy experts at PETA would say that mice aren’t ours to use and that these experiments often don’t translate to human trials, anyway .

To bridge this ethical divide, research universities and private companies in the UK have signed a Concordat on Openness on Animal Research , pledging to proactively and transparently inform the public about their treatment of lab animals. In the decade since its launch, nine other countries have followed suit. It’s likely not a coincidence that these countries generally have the tightest restrictions on animal use. However, an independent review found that Concordat signatories in the UK are still struggling to be transparent about their animal research practices in the face of potential disapproval.

On top of the slow pace for necessary regulation, stigma obscures the true nature of what happens in these labs. In the late 2000s, the most extreme opponents of animal testing used violence to try to end the practice, sending poisoned razors and death threats to lab heads and, in at least one case, firebombing a neurobiologist’s car . But rather than encourage scientists to reconsider their methods, attacks like these cemented a culture of silence. While physical violence is not representative of activism against animal testing today — which usually centers around investigations , government advocacy , and direct care for animals and has shifted to become more inclusive — the threat of retaliation still haunts animal researchers , some of whom are encouraged by their institutions to hide their connections to animal testing from the public.

Scientists “don’t want to feel like they’re bad people,” said neuroscientist and author Garet Lahvis, who has written about primate research for Vox.

What if I want to avoid animal testing altogether? What does “cruelty-free” mean?

After learning about what lab animals go through, some people will want to find ways to avoid the products of animal testing. This is much easier said than done, however.

Animal testing is pervasive in health care. Many treatments we take for granted today, like anesthesia , flu shots , and allergy medications , went through preclinical trials in animals before reaching us. They are also valuable to your health, so please keep taking your medicine if you need it. We have more power to avoid animal testing elsewhere. Animal testing requirements are generally looser to nonexistent for cosmetics, cleaning supplies, and other household chemicals, so it’s possible to buy “cruelty-free” makeup or laundry detergent.

The legal distinction between “cosmetics” and “drugs” is blurry, though. Essentially, drugs claim to affect the body’s structure or function in some way, while cosmetics are things you apply to your body to change your appearance (like lipstick) or clean yourself (like deodorant — but not soap, which is neither a cosmetic nor a drug, but its own special category ). Many products we might think of as cosmetics are, in fact, also drugs, like anti-dandruff shampoo, tinted moisturizer with sunscreen, and other cosmetics that claim to treat some ailment. In the US, all of these items had to be tested on animals until the FDA Modernization Act 2.0 took effect in 2023 .

Cruelty-free claims used on product labels are often misleading, and differences in regulation across countries add to the confusion.

For years, the EU , Canada, Mexico, and 16 other countries (including South Korea, for the skincare girlies ) have had legislation in place banning animal testing for cosmetics or their ingredients (although last year, the UK changed their policy to allow testing for makeup ingredients again). But testing on final products or their ingredients has never been banned in the US. Even if a company doesn’t test its final product on animals, it may still run animal tests on raw ingredients. And even if those raw ingredients aren’t currently being tested on animals, they probably were when they were first introduced.

The US government doesn’t have a legal definition for the terms “cruelty-free” or “not tested on animals.” A product labeled “cruelty-free” likely earned voluntary certification from a private organization like Leaping Bunny or PETA’s Beauty Without Bunnies program by pledging to end animal testing at all stages of product development. The definition of “cruelty-free” isn’t standardized across animal protection groups, but earning a “bunny label” generally means that a brand attested to never conducting tests on animals during a product’s development.

Despite pressure from advocates and consumers, many US companies don’t bother with these pledges on animal testing. As of this year, approximately 310 brands globally still test their beauty and household cleaning products on animals. And some actively say they don’t test on animals at all but still sell their products to countries like China, which, until recently, required that all cosmetics (even imported ones) be tested on animals . Most certification programs exclude brands and products sold in China for this very reason.

To make it easier for US companies to sell truly cruelty-free products in China, US regulators and animal welfare advocates have been lobbying their Chinese counterparts for years to change their approach to animal testing for consumer products. Twenty years ago, Thomas Hartung, a toxicologist at the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, spoke with the National Medical Products Administration (China’s FDA) about regulating animal testing of chemicals and told me “it was like we were coming from Mars.”

In response to yearslong campaigns by organizations like PETA and the Institute for In Vitro Sciences, China recently lifted this requirement . It is now possible to buy Chinese cosmetics that weren’t tested on animals — kind of.

As of January 2021, China no longer requires pre-market or post-market animal testing for cosmetics, meaning that companies from the US and elsewhere can sell things like eyeliner or nail polish in China while still maintaining “cruelty-free” status. But certain “special cosmetics,” like sunscreen, teeth whiteners, and hair dye, or products made for children, are all still required to undergo animal testing. And if a product uses a raw ingredient that isn’t already approved in China, foreign companies have to either reformulate or get that ingredient approved, which requires more animal testing. So, it’s possible to sell US-made “cruelty-free” products in China, but it requires sifting through a confusing and ever-evolving swamp of documentation requirements.

We have made imperfect progress toward a world of cruelty-free cosmetics. While the number of animals used for cosmetic testing in the US has dropped by 90 percent since the 1980s, 44 of the largest 50 cosmetic brands in the world still are not cruelty-free . And without a consensus agreement on what “cruelty-free” actually means, consumers are left to guess which bunny labels are genuine and which are false advertising.

Since many brands can just slap on cruelty-free claims while still sending products abroad to animal testing labs, for now, if you want to avoid animal testing, Leaping Bunny and Beauty Without Bunnies are your best bets. These certifications consider post-market animal testing in other countries as part of their standards.

Alternative methods are (slowly) coming

In some places, like the UK, strict restrictions on animal research and a commitment to transparency have considerably improved lab conditions in recent decades. Companies like Neuralink , however, continue to perform high-risk, ethically dubious experiments hidden from the public eye.

While new alternative methods are under development, animal testing remains necessary in at least some circumstances. Tight regulation — and buy-in from scientists — will be key to minimizing harm in the meantime.

Nicole Kleinstreuer, acting director of the NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM) , told me that improving the current state of animal testing hinges on researchers gathering “the courage to admit that we can substantially improve upon how we’ve been doing things historically.”

Until relatively recently, alternatives to animal testing in many areas of science were very limited. But in the past decade, bioengineering and computer science have advanced rapidly. New tools like AI, organoids (balls of stem cells that grow into organ tissue), and CRISPR have made replacing animals, at least in certain experiments, more attainable.

For chemical testing, good animal-free research methods have been around for decades — long before most scientists considered using them. Even when well-validated animal alternatives exist, researchers can be slow to adopt them . Hartung, a toxicologist, said, “I turned 60 last year. The methods they’re using were introduced when I was in kindergarten.”

In 2007, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine , a nonprofit that produces independent policy guidance for the US, laid out a strategy for researchers to move away from using animals in toxicity testing and to develop faster, more human-relevant models to take their place. Today, a number of working groups, both within the US and collaborating internationally, are still trying to put this principle into practice.

As the largest single public funder of biomedical research in the world, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is uniquely positioned to influence animal testing. In 2023, the NIH spent an estimated $19 billion on US-based projects involving animals, according to Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Research and Experimentation. Between 2011 and 2021, they spent $2.2 billion on projects based in other countries — where oversight boils down to trusting self-generated, non-validated reports from foreign institutions.

Kleinstreuer said that changing the current state of animal research “really necessitates a sea change, and a dramatic investment on the part of funders, particularly the NIH.”

The people in charge of the money have the power to redistribute it and could choose to spend more of it on projects that don’t use animals and less on those that do. That’s the easy part. “It’s kind of the lowest-hanging fruit, and the easiest ask,” said Emily Trunnell , director of Science Advancement and Outreach at PETA. “Even people who are in support of animal testing are on board with the funding of different methods as well.”

NICEATM, led by Kleinstreuer, is doing the in-the-weeds work of figuring out how we’d know whether a replacement method is good enough to substitute for animal experiments. Earlier this year, the NIH also approved the Complement Animal Research in Experimentation (Complement-ARIE) Program , which will set up technology development centers for researchers to make better human-based models.

Non-animal methods can already outperform certain animal tests. Back in 2018, Hartung’s research group created algorithms mapping the relationships between 10,000 known chemical compounds. With this model and lots of data, they predicted the toxicity of 89 percent of the 48,000 toxic chemicals more accurately than animal tests could and for much less money — without endangering any living creatures. Since then, Hartung said things have only become better. But AI-driven research methods are still limited by what real-world data has already been collected. “When you have no data,” he said, “nothing is possible.”

In some cases, using animals is simply bad science. There are some questions “that absolutely necessitate a human cell-based approach,” Kleinstreuer said. “You can’t look at the efficacy of a drug whose target is not expressed in animals by using animal models,” she added. Certain cancer drugs target protein receptors that only exist in humans, and gene therapies often aim to rewrite human-specific DNA sequences. One emerging option: take a sample of human cells, reprogram them to behave like whatever cells you want them to be, and test your drug on the resulting tissue sample.

These tools offer exciting opportunities to personalize medicine to individual patients, but it’s still tough to extrapolate results from a small mass of lab-grown cells in a tightly controlled environment to a human body and the complex interactions of its organ systems. Cancer and embryonic development are incredibly complex biological processes, involving lots of different interconnected body parts that evolve over time. Without that capability, Kleinstreuer said it’s harder to argue that a substance is actually safe and ready to clear for human use.

Change happens one retirement at a time

As it stands, alternatives to animal tests are not being used as widely as they should be, especially in cosmetics. But if we want to study things like deep brain stimulation or run safety tests on new cancer drugs , animal tests are all we have.

While we are stuck with animal experiments, we can try to limit them and make them more humane. Lahvis believes that we should have extremely strict criteria for what animal experiments are funded. Strategically allocating grant funding could not only save millions of lives, but also inspire better science.

Convincing animal researchers to replace animals with other methods is still a huge challenge. Hartung joked that in academia, change happens “one retirement at a time.” Unfortunately, “it’s often been one graveyard at a time,” as retired scientists continue to serve as reviewers who help choose what new projects get funded and published.

The further along a scientist is in their career, the more challenging it becomes to pivot. Because scientists are pushed to maintain a constant level of productivity, Trunnell said, someone who builds their whole lab around their current use of animal models has no incentive to change, unless they have a strong desire to do so. Changing tactics could mean putting their job on the line.

“We’re highly leveraged by the system to keep doing what we’ve always done,” Lahvis agreed. And, Hartung said, turning against a tried-and-true method would require a scientist invalidating their existing body of work or at least acknowledging that it was either unethical, ineffective, or inefficient. Using past observations to inform future experiments is at the core of the scientific method, but, Hartung said, “We’re not trained to be very self-critical.”

That said, a growing number of scientists support the development of non-animal methods, even as they continue to work with animals themselves. People want new tools, whether for the sake of animal welfare or simply because it would make for better science. We might just have to wait another generation.

• Animal Welfare

Most Popular

• Trump’s biggest fans aren’t who you think
• Conservatives are shocked — shocked! — that Tucker Carlson is soft on Nazis
• iPad kids speak up
• The astonishing link between bats and the deaths of human babies
• The right-wing podcasters turned Russian propaganda dupes, explained

Today, Explained

Understand the world with a daily explainer plus the most compelling stories of the day.

This is the title for the native ad

More in Future Perfect

From granola bars to chips, more studies are revealing that UPFs are tied to diseases like cancer and depression.

Too much fluoride might lower IQ in kids, a new federal report says. The science (and debate), explained.

EVs help reduce greenhouse emissions. But too many used gas-guzzlers could make that impossible.

The US military’s recruiting crisis, explained.

Gavin Newsom could decide the future of AI safety. But will he cave to billionaire pressure?

Organ companies are getting up to pancreas hijinks.

105 Animal Testing Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

Looking for interesting animal testing topics to research and write about? This field is truly controversial and worth studying!

• 🌶️ Titles: Catchy & Creative
• 🐶 Essay: How to Write
• 🏆 Best Essay Examples
• 📌 Good Topics to Research
• 🎯 Most Interesting Topics to Write about

❓ Animal Testing Research Questions

In your animal testing essay, you might want to explore the historical or legal perspective, focus on the issue of animal rights, or discuss the advantages or disadvantages of animal testing in medicine, pharmacology, or cosmetic industry. We’ve gathered the most creative and catchy animal testing titles and added top animal testing essay examples. There are also useful tips on making and outline, formulating a thesis, and creating a hook sentence for your animal testing essay.

🌶️ Animal Testing Titles: Catchy & Creative

• What would life be like without animal testing?
• Animal testing: the cruelest experiments.
• AWA: why does not it protect all animals?
• What if animals experimented on humans?
• In the skin of a guinea pig: a narrative essay.
• Opposing animal testing: success stories.
• Animal-tested products: should they be destroyed?
• What have we gained from experiments on animals?
• Animal testing and cancer research: past and present.

🐶 Animal Testing Essay: How to Write

Animal testing has been an acute problem for a long time. Scientists and pharmaceutical firms use this approach to test cosmetics, foods, and other products people use daily.

Essays on animal testing are important because they highlight the significance of the problem. Writing outstanding animal testing essays requires extensive research and dedication.

We have prepared some do’s and don’ts for your excellent essay. But first, you should select a topic for your paper. Here are the examples of animal testing essay topics you can choose from:

• The question of animal intelligence from the perspective of animal testing
• Animal testing should (not) be banned
• How animal testing affects endangered species
• The history and consequences of animal testing
• The controversy associated with animal testing
• Animal Bill of Rights: Pros and cons
• Is animal testing necessary?

Remember that these animal testing essay titles are just the ideas for your paper. You are free to select other relevant titles and topics for discussion, too. Once you have selected the problem for your essay, you can start working on the paper. Here are some do’s of writing about animal testing:

• Do extensive preliminary research on the issue you have selected. You should be aware of all the problems associated with your questions, its causes, and consequences. Ask your professor about the sources you can use. Avoid relying on Wikipedia and personal blogs as your primary sources of information.
• Develop a well-organized outline and think of how you will structure your paper. Think of the main animal testing essay points and decide how you can present them in the paper. Remember to include introductory and concluding sections along with several body paragraphs.
• Start your paper with a hooking sentence. An animal testing essay hook should grab the reader’s attention. You can present an interesting question or statistics in this sentence.
• Include a well-defined thesis statement at the end of the introductory section.
• Your reader should understand the issue you are discussing. Explain what animal testing is, provide arguments for your position, and support them with evidence from your research.
• Discuss alternative perspectives on the issue if you are working on a persuasive essay. At the same time, you need to show that your opinion is more reliable than the opposing ones.
• Remember that your paper should not be offensive. Even if you criticize animal testing, stick to the formal language and provide evidence of why this practice is harmful.

There are some important points you should avoid while working on your paper. Here are some important don’ts to remember:

• Avoid making claims if you cannot reference them. Support your arguments with evidence from the literature or credible online sources even if you are writing an opinion piece. References will help the reader to understand that your viewpoint is reliable.
• Do not go over or below the word limit. Stick to your professor’s instructions.
• Avoid copying the essays you will find online. Your paper should be plagiarism-free.
• Avoid making crucial grammatical mistakes. Pay attention to the word choice and sentence structures. Check the paper several times before sending it for approval. If you are not sure whether your grammar is correct, ask a friend to look through the paper for you.

Do not forget to look at some of our free samples that will help you with your paper!

Animal Testing Hook Sentence

Your animal testing essay should start with a hook – an opening statement aiming to grab your reader’s attention. A good idea might be to use an impressive fact or statistics connected to experiments on animals:

• More than 100 million animals are killed in US laboratories each year.
• Animal Welfare Act (AWA) does not cover 99% animals used in experiments: according to it, rats, birds, reptiles, and fish are not animals.
• More than 50% adults in the US are against animal testing.

🏆 Best Animal Testing Essay Examples

• Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay It is crucial to agree that animal testing might be unethical phenomenon as argued by some groups; nonetheless, it should continue following its merits and contributions to the humankind in the realms of drug investigations […]
• Should Animals Be Used in Medical Research? It is therefore possible to use animals while testing the dangers and the toxicity of new drugs and by so doing; it is possible to protect human beings from the dangers that can emanate from […]
• Cosmetic Testing on Animals The surface of the skin or near the eyes of such animals is meant to simulate that of the average human and, as such, is one of easiest methods of determining whether are particular type […]
• Experimentation on Animals However, critics of experimenting with animals argue that animals are subjected to a lot of pain and suffering in the course of coming up with scientific breakthroughs which in the long run may prove futile.
• Animal Testing: History and Arguments Nevertheless, that law was more focused on the welfare of animals in laboratories rather than on the prohibition of animal testing.
• Animal Experiments and Inhuman Treatment Although the results of such a laboratory may bring answers to many questions in medicine, genetics, and other vital spheres, it is frequently a case that the treatment of such animals is inhumane and cruel. […]
• Animal Testing and Ethics I believe it is also difficult to develop efficient legislation on the matter as people have different views on animal research and the line between ethical and unethical is blurred in this area.
• The Debate on Animal Testing The purpose of this paper is to define animal testing within a historical context, establish ethical and legal issues surrounding the acts, discuss animal liberation movements, arguments in support and against the act of animal […]
• Animal Testing in Medicine and Industry Animal testing is the inescapable reality of medicine and industry. However, between human suffering and animal suffering, the former is more important.
• Preclinical Testing on Animals The authors argue that despite the recent decline in the level of quality and transparency of preclinical trials, the scientific communities should always rely on animal testing before moving to human subjects and the subsequent […]
• Using Animals in Medical Research and Experiments While discussing the use of animals in medical research according to the consequentialist perspective, it is important to state that humans’ preferences cannot be counted higher to cause animals’ suffering; humans and animals’ preferences need […]
• Laboratory Experiments on Animals: Argument Against In some cases, the animals are not given any painkillers because their application may alter the effect of the medication which is investigated.
• Animal Testing From Medical and Ethical Viewpoints Striving to discover and explain the peculiarities of body functioning, already ancient Greeks and Romans resorted to vivisecting pigs; the scientific revolution of the Enlightenment era witnessed animal testing becoming the leading trend and a […]
• Negative Impacts of Animal Testing To alter these inhumane laws, we should organize a social movement aiming at the reconsideration of the role of animals in research and improvement of their positions.
• Animal Testing: Long and Unpretty History Nevertheless, that law was more focused on the welfare of animals in laboratories rather than on the prohibition of animal testing.
• Animal Testing as an Unnecessary and Atrocious Practice Such acts of violence could be partially excused by the necessity to test medications that are developed to save human lives however, this kind of testing is even more inhumane as it is ineffective in […]
• Animal Testing and Environmental Protection While the proponents of animal use in research argued that the sacrifice of animals’ lives is crucial for advancing the sphere of medicine, the argument this essay will defend relates to the availability of modern […]
• Animal Testing for Scientific Research Despite the fact that the present-day science makes no secret of the use of animals for research purposes, not many people know what deprivation, pain, and misery those animals have to experience in laboratories.
• Animal Testing: History and Ethics Moreover, in the twelfth century, another Arabic physician, Avenzoar dissected animals and established animal testing experiment in testing surgical processes prior to their application to man. Trevan in 1927 to evaluate the effectiveness of digitalis […]
• Animal Testing Effects on Psychological Investigation In this context, ethical considerations remain a central theme in psychological research.”Ethics in research refers to the application of moral rules and professional codes of conduct to the collection, analysis, reporting, and publication of information […]
• Genetic Modification and Testing: Ethical Considerations It is done on a molecular level by synthesizing DNA, generating sequences and then inserting the received product into the organism which will be the carrier of the outcome. Another possibility is that the time […]
• Animal Testing: Why It Is Still Being Used The major reason for such “devotion” to animal testing can be explained by the fact that alternative sources of testing are insufficient and too inaccurate to replace conventional way of testing.
• Effects of Animal Testing and Alternatives Another challenge to the proponents of animal testing is related to dosage and the time line for a study. Animal rights values rebuff the notion that animals should have an importance to human beings in […]
• Ethics Problems in Animal Experimentation In spite of the fact that it is possible to find the arguments to support the idea of using animals in experiments, animal experimentation cannot be discussed as the ethical procedure because animals have the […]
• Animal Testing: Ethical Dilemmas in Business This means that both humans and animals have rights that need to be respected, and that is what brings about the many dilemmas that are experienced in this field.
• Should animals be used for scientific research? Therefore, considering the benefits that have been accrued from research activities due to use of animals in scientific research, I support that animals should be used in scientific research.
• Use of Animals in Research Testing: Ethical Justifications Involved The present paper argues that it is ethically justified to use animals in research settings if the goals of the research process are noble and oriented towards the advancement of human life.
• Ethical Problems in Animal Experimentation The banning of companies from testing on animals will force the manufacturers to use conventional methods to test their drugs and products.
• Utilitarianism for Animals: Testing and Experimentation There are alternatives in testing drugs such as tissue culture of human cells and hence this is bound to be more accurate in the findings.
• Use of Animals in Biological Testing Thus, these veterinarians have realized that the results that are realized from the animal research are very crucial in the improvement of the health of human being as well as that of animals.
• Medical Research on Animals Should be Forbidden by Law Vaccines and treatment regimes for various diseases that previously led to the death of humans were all discovered through research on animals.
• Psychoactive Drug Testing on Animals The alterations in behavioral traits of animals due to psychoactive drugs are primarily attributed to the changes in the brain functions or inhibition of certain brain components in animals which ultimately translates to changes in […]
• Negative Impacts of Animal Testing In many instances it can be proofed that drugs have been banned from the market after extensive research on animal testing and consuming a lot of cash, because of the dire effects that they cause […]

📌 Good Animal Testing Topics to Research

• Monkeys Don’t Like Wearing Makeup: Animal Testing In The Cosmetics Industry
• Animal Testing – Should Animal Experimentation Be Permitted
• Essay Animal Testing and In Vitro Testing as a Replacement
• Animal Testing : A Better Knowledge Of Human Body
• The Importance Of Animal Testing For Evaluating Consumer Safety
• The Issues on Animal Testing and the Alternative Procedures to Avoid the Use of the Inhuman Experimentation
• An Alternative to the Harsh and Unnecessary Practices of Animal Testing for Products, Drugs, Chemicals and Other Research
• The Unethical Use of Animals and the Need to Ban Animal Testing for Medical Research Purposes in the United States
• An Argument in Favor of Animal Testing for the Purpose of Clinical Research
• An Argument Against Animal Testing and the Banning of the Practice in the United States
• The Debate About the Ethics of Animal Testing and Its Effects on Us
• An Argument in Favor of Animal Testing as Beneficial to Human Health Research
• Animal Testing and the Reasons Why It Should Be Illegal
• The Principles of the Animal Testing From the Human Perspective
• The Ethical Issues on the Practice of Animal Testing to Test Cosmetics and Drugs
• Stopping Animal Testing and Vivisection by Passing a Bill against Animal Cruelty

🎯 Most Interesting Animal Testing Topics to Write about

• An Argument Against Animal Testing of Consumer Products and Drugs
• The Consequences and Unethical Practice of Animal Testing for Medical Training and Experiments
• How Do The Contributions Of Animal Testing To Global Medical
• Ways To Improve Animal Welfare After Premising The Animal Testing
• Animal Testing – Necessary or Barbaric and Wrong?
• Animal Testing And Its Impact On The Environment
• Animal Testing and Its Contribution to the Advancement of Medicine
• Cosmetics and Animal Testing: The Cause of Death and Mistreatment
• Animal Testing And People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals
• Animal Rights Activists and the Controversial Issue of Animal Testing
• A History and the Types of Animal Testing in the Medical Area
• Argumentation on Medical Benefits of Animal Testing
• An Analysis of the Concept of Animal Testing Which Lowers the Standard of Human Life
• Is The Humane Society International Gave For Animal Testing
• A Discussion of Whether Animal Testing Is Good for Mankind or Violation of Rights
• The Ethics Of Animal Testing For Vaccine Development And Potential Alternatives
• The Good and Bad of Human Testing and Animal Testing
• What Should the Government Do About Animal Testing?
• Why Does Animal Testing Lower Our Standard of Living?
• Should Animals Be Used in Research?
• Why Should Animal Testing Be Accepted in the World?
• How Does Technology Impact Animal Testing?
• Why Should Animal Testing Be Illegal?
• Should Animal Testing Remain Legal?
• Why Should Animal Testing Be Banned?
• Can the Animal Testing Done to Find Cures for Diseases Be Humane?
• Does Animal Testing Really Work?
• Why Can’t Alternatives Like Computers Replace Research Animals?
• Should Animal Testing Continue to Test Cures for Human Diseases?
• How Does Animal Testing Effect Medicine?
• Should Animal Testing Continue or Be Stopped?
• What Are Advantages and Disadvantages of Animal Testing?
• Why Can Animal Testing Save Our Lives?
• Is Stem Cell Research Beginning of the End of Animal Testing?
• Do Beauty Products Suffer From Negative Publicity if They Conduct Trials on Animals?
• Should Medicine Trials Be Conducted?
• Can Results of Animal Testing Be Generalized to Adults?
• What Are the Origin and History of Animal Testing?
• Why Are Animals Needed to Screen Consumer Products for Safety When Products Tested by Alternative Methods, Are Available?
• How Much Does an Animal Suffer Due to Testing?
• What Is the Effectiveness of Animal Rights Groups in Stopping Animal Testing?
• How Do We Learn From Biomedical Research Using Animals?
• Who Cares for Animals in Research?
• How Do Laboratory Animal Science Professionals Feel About Their Work?
• Why Are There Increasing Numbers of Mice, Rats, and Fish Used in Research?
• How Can We Be Sure Lost or Stolen Pets Are Not Used in Research?
• Why Do Clinical Trials in Humans Require Prior Animal Testing?
• Vegetarianism Essay Ideas
• Animal Welfare Ideas
• Bioethics Titles
• Wildlife Ideas
• Extinction Research Topics
• Hunting Questions
• Genetic Engineering Topics
• Zoo Research Ideas
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, November 9). 105 Animal Testing Essay Topic Ideas & Examples. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/animal-testing-essay-examples/

"105 Animal Testing Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." IvyPanda , 9 Nov. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/topic/animal-testing-essay-examples/.

IvyPanda . (2023) '105 Animal Testing Essay Topic Ideas & Examples'. 9 November.

IvyPanda . 2023. "105 Animal Testing Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." November 9, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/animal-testing-essay-examples/.

1. IvyPanda . "105 Animal Testing Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." November 9, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/animal-testing-essay-examples/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "105 Animal Testing Essay Topic Ideas & Examples." November 9, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/topic/animal-testing-essay-examples/.

Benefit from Reliable and Quality Service Today!

Your essay will take just a few minutes of your day! We'll craft it for you in a moment

Speech Against Tests on Animals

A relevant and controversial topic in the world today, tests on animals are the nightmare of animal right activists. If you want to stand by their belief that such a practice is horrid and inhumane, and start a discourse that is going to make an impact and shift the worldview of your listeners, here are a few key points to consider in order to build it up flawlessly.

Short and Concise

When composing the outline of your future speech, make an effort to pinpoint the claims you want to make. A topic like this is bound to bring up many factors and ramifications of those factors like examples, arguments, and statistics. Make sure to choose the most illustrative and indisputable matches to light your fire of truth. Even though a longer speech might be more enlightening and deeper in meaning, your job is to provoke thought. Be sure, the interested people will, no doubt, look for further data on the topic if they are truly moved and outraged by your words.

Uncontested Evidence

What are the key points to provide while speaking out against animal testing? One strategy is to start with uncomfortable questions, and then provide the answers with the data. Make sure to focus on the cruelty of wasteful experiments, on the fact that most of such testing is unreliable because of the differences between humans and animals, on the fact that it can even be dangerous and lead to mass death if the results do not go into details about the side effects of such medicine. Providing an argument about the needless experiments, such as cosmetic testing, is also a powerful eye-opener. Be sure to operate with numbers and facts, as they are the most convincing while trying to prove your truth. For example:

It is a common fact that 95% of drugs do not survive the human trials, in spite of promising results during animal tests.

Consider the Audience

As in all types of writing and presenting, the audience is a crucial factor to consider while composing your speech. Basing on the age, experience and interests of the audience you can predict whether to use formal or informal speech, whether to provide more in-depth results of research or focus on the main factors, whether to appeal to the emotional side or rigid logical explanations.

General Presentation

The last thing to mind might be the most effective, even if seemingly superfluous. Your speech might be a punch in the gut, but only if you are strong enough to fight. It will resonate and knock out the audience. That’s why you need to appear self-confident and tough. Get rid of habits that show your nervousness: slumping shoulders, crossing arms or biting nails. Look straight ahead of you and use the power of your voice to be loud and clear, making the right stresses on the words that will give the most impact. It is better to memorize and tell it, instead of reading it off your paper.

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be published.

Place your order now

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Animal Testing — The Ethics of Animal Testing: An Argument Against its Practice

The Ethics of Animal Testing: an Argument Against Its Practice

• Categories: Animal Testing Bioethics

About this sample

Words: 432 |

Published: Mar 18, 2021

Words: 432 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Social Issues Science

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 1012 words

6 pages / 2522 words

1 pages / 468 words

4 pages / 1618 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Animal Testing

Animal testing has been a common practice in scientific research and testing for decades. The use of animals, however, remains a highly controversial issue. Animal Research: The Ethics of Animal Experimentation. [...]

Animal cruelty is a pressing issue that has gained significant attention in recent years. The mistreatment and abuse of animals not only raises ethical concerns but also poses a threat to our society as a whole. This essay will [...]

Animal testing is a controversial topic that has sparked heated debates among scientists, ethicists, and the general public. The ethical implications of using animals in scientific research are complex and multifaceted, with [...]

Animal research has long been a contentious issue, with proponents touting its benefits to scientific progress and detractors decrying its ethical implications. This essay explores both sides of the debate and offers a [...]

Animal testing is a debated issue over the previous decades. Animal testing in simple words is the use of animals in researches in order to determine the safety of various products such as foods, drugs and cosmetics. People have [...]

“Opinion and Evidence for the Need to Move Away from Animal Testing” was an article published by The Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) on 2nd Nov, 2017. An article stated that how the author clearly convinces [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Persuasive Speech On Animal Testing

In this persuasive speech on animal testing, we embark on a critical examination of the ethical and scientific implications of using animals in research. We will explore the potential for pain and suffering, the scientific validity of animal models, and the availability of alternative methods.

Join us as we delve into this complex issue, weighing the potential benefits against the moral concerns and seeking a balanced perspective.

Animal testing has been a contentious topic for decades, with strong arguments on both sides. Animal rights activists argue that it is cruel and unnecessary, while scientists maintain that it is essential for medical progress. In this speech, we will examine both sides of the debate and provide a comprehensive overview of the issue.

Animal Testing: Ethical Concerns

Animal testing has been a contentious issue for decades, raising concerns about the potential for pain and suffering inflicted on animals. Proponents of animal rights argue that animals are sentient beings deserving of moral consideration and that using them for experimentation is ethically wrong.

Specific cases, such as the use of primates in invasive brain experiments or the testing of cosmetics on rabbits, have sparked outrage and public outcry. Animal rights groups contend that these practices cause unnecessary pain and distress to animals and violate their inherent rights.

Those who believe animal testing is morally wrong often draw parallels to human experimentation, arguing that it is unacceptable to inflict suffering on any living creature for the sake of scientific advancement. They advocate for the development and adoption of alternative methods that do not involve the use of animals.

Animal Testing: Scientific Validity