write a descriptive essay citing the impact of massive open online course

Massive Open Online Courses Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Video-based learning (VBL) has a long history of development. First attempts were made at the time of the World War II. VBL were used to train soldiers. This method was very effective and led to the significant improvement of their skills. Subsequently, VBL becomes a more popular instrument in an educational process. Such videos also improved the professional competence of educators. By the late 1980’s, the development of video technologies made it easier to incorporate VBL in an educational system (Yousef, Chatti, & Schroeder, 2014). One of the most recent advances is massive open online courses (MOOCs). These courses provide access to educational material for a wider audience. MOOCs offer not only video lessons and practice materials but also interactive forums where users can get support from teachers and other students. Although distance education benefits numerous people, it has certain drawbacks as well. The main goal of this paper is to discuss MOOCs, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages.

Publications on that matter have become more relevant in recent years. Various specialists discuss ways for the improvement of VBL. The most relevant question is how to increase the effectiveness of VBL methods taking into account academic achievements of students and professional skills of educators. The introduction of MOOCs has changed the course of the development of VBL. This innovation offers many options to users. MOOCs are used by educational institutions across the globe. The international community needs more educational opportunities. For example, in India, “40 million additional university places are estimated to be required by 2025” (Liyanagunawardena, Williams, & Adams, 2014, p. 38). MOOCs can help to resolve this problem. Educational specialists divided MOOCs into several categories. The first category is connectivist MOOCs. They were designed in order to enhance collaboration and information exchange. The second category is xMOOCs. This model was developed to meet growing demands of institutions. The third category is artificial intelligence Stanford like courses that are focused on the aggregation, altering, and development of resources.

However, MOOCs are mostly used in North America and Europe. According to Liyanagunawardena et al. (2014), “there is very limited participation from Asia and even less from Africa” (p. 39). There are various reasons for that. First, most towns and rural areas do not have sufficient infrastructure. Another reason is the lack of digital literacy and English language skills among the global population (Nkuyubwatsi, 2014). Other factors like an ability to comprehend a substantial amount of information and the delivery environment play a crucial role as well

Also, completion rates of MOOCs are quite low. Many cases of repeated re-enrolment in the same courses are reported. The retention of users is one of the major challenges for MOOCs. There is not enough research on participants who failed to complete MOOCs. One of the possible reasons for students’ giving up these courses is “an overwhelming amount of information” offered by MOOCs (Liyanagunawardena et al., 2014, p. 40). Another important problem is the re-use of available materials. MOOCs have a very strict copyright policy that serves as an additional obstacle to the adequate promotion of such programs in developing countries.

In conclusion, the introduction of digital technologies changed the role of VBL. Educators got the opportunity to evaluate and guide learners using computers. Therefore, students got involved in studying more actively. The growth of the internet led to the invention of new educational systems that became more available. However, there are several significant drawbacks of such systems. Therefore, the further development in this area is crucial for the international community.

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Williams, S., & Adams, A. A. (2014). The impact and reach of MOOCs: A developing countries’ perspective. eLearning Papers , 38-46.

Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2014). Cultural translation in massive open online courses (MOOCs). eLearning Papers , 47-59.

Yousef, A., Chatti, M., & Schroeder, U. (2014). Video-based learning: A critical analysis of the research published in 2003-2013 and future visions . Web.

• Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Pittsburgh Urban Math Project
• The Effects of Integrating Mobile Devices with Teaching and Learning on Students’ Learning Performance
• New “Business” Technological Developments
• Online Courses: The Future or the End of the University
• New Online Learning Platform: Market Analysis
• Online, Hybrid, and On-Campus Courses
• Effectiveness of Technologies and WEB Tools
• The Power of Connection: Personal Learning Network Building
• The Utilization of iPads in Education
• Online Collaborative Learning
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2021, May 28). Massive Open Online Courses. https://ivypanda.com/essays/massive-open-online-courses/

"Massive Open Online Courses." IvyPanda , 28 May 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/massive-open-online-courses/.

IvyPanda . (2021) 'Massive Open Online Courses'. 28 May.

IvyPanda . 2021. "Massive Open Online Courses." May 28, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/massive-open-online-courses/.

1. IvyPanda . "Massive Open Online Courses." May 28, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/massive-open-online-courses/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Massive Open Online Courses." May 28, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/massive-open-online-courses/.

• Entertainment
• Environment
• Information Science and Technology
• Social Issues

Home Essay Samples Education Distance Education

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below

• Human Development
• Academic Performance
• Single Sex Schools

Related Essays

Need writing help?

You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need

*No hidden charges

100% Unique Essays

Absolutely Confidential

Money Back Guarantee

By clicking “Send Essay”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails

You can also get a UNIQUE essay on this or any other topic

Thank you! We’ll contact you as soon as possible.

March 13, 2013

13 min read

Massive Open Online Courses, aka MOOCs, Transform Higher Education and Science

Science, engineering and technology courses have been in the vanguard of the massive open online course movement. These classes also are providing fodder for scientific research on learning

By M. Mitchell Waldrop & Nature magazine

When campus president Wallace Loh walked into Juan Uriagereka's office last August, he got right to the point. “We need courses for this thing — yesterday!”

Uriagereka, associate provost for faculty affairs at the University of Maryland in College Park, knew exactly what his boss meant. Campus administrators around the world had been buzzing for months about massive open online courses, or MOOCs: Internet-based teaching programs designed to handle thousands of students simultaneously, in part using the tactics of social-networking websites. To supplement video lectures, much of the learning comes from online comments, questions and discussions. Participants even mark one another's tests.

MOOCs had exploded into the academic consciousness in summer 2011, when a free artificial-intelligence course offered by Stanford University in California attracted 160,000 students from around the world — 23,000 of whom finished it. Now, Coursera in Mountain View, California — one of the three researcher-led start-up companies actively developing MOOCs — was inviting the University of Maryland to submit up to five courses for broadcast on its software platform. Loh wanted in. “He was very clear,” says Uriagereka. “We needed to be a part of this.”

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing . By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Similar conversations have been taking place at major universities around the world, as dozens — 74, at the last count — rush to sign up. Science, engineering and technology courses have been in the vanguard of the movement, but offerings in management, humanities and the arts are growing in popularity (see ' MOOCs rising' ). “In 25 years of observing higher education, I've never seen anything move this fast,” says Mitchell Stevens, a sociologist at Stanford and one of the leaders of an ongoing, campus-wide discussion series known as Education's Digital Future.

Image: Courtesy of Nature magazine

The ferment is attributable in part to MOOCs hitting at exactly the right time. Bricks-and-mortar campuses are unlikely to keep up with the demand for advanced education: according to one widely quoted calculation, the world would have to construct more than four new 30,000-student universities per week to accommodate the children who will reach enrolment age by 2025 (see go.nature.com/mjuzhu ), let alone the millions of adults looking for further education or career training. Colleges and universities are also under tremendous financial pressure, especially in the United States, where rocketing tuition fees and ever-expanding student debt have resulted in a backlash from politicians, parents and students demanding to know what their money is going towards.

When MOOCs came along, says Chris Dede, who studies educational technologies at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, they promised to solve these problems by radically expanding the reach of existing campuses while streamlining the workload for educators — and universities seized on them as the next big thing.

There is reason to hope that this is a positive development, says Roy Pea, who heads a Stanford center that studies how people use technology. MOOCs, which have incorporated decades of research on how students learn best, could free faculty members from the drudgery of repetitive introductory lectures. What's more, they can record online students' every mouse click, an ability that promises to transform education research by generating data that could improve teaching in the future. “We can have microanalytics on every paper, every test, right down to what media each student prefers,” says Pea.

MOOC companies still face challenges, such as dealing with low course-completion rates and proving that they can make profit. And they have a lot of convincing to do among faculty members, says Uriagereka. “Some salivate and can't wait to be a part of it,” he says, noting that his university had 20 volunteers for its 5 inaugural MOOCs. “Others say, 'Wait a minute. How do we preserve quality? How do we connect with students?'”

Large-scale pedagogy MOOCs are largely a product of one corridor in the Stanford computer-science department, where the offices of Andrew Ng, Daphne Koller and Sebastian Thrun are just a few steps apart. But they are also the fruit of research dating back to at least the 1990s, when the explosive worldwide growth of the Internet inspired a multitude of efforts to exploit it for education. Campus administrators tended to regard such projects as a sideshow — the higher-education financial crunch was not quite as serious back then — so most experiments were the work of committed individuals, departments or research centers. But with the relentless advance of technologies such as broadband, social networking and smart phones, researchers' interest continued to grow.

Ng got involved in 2007 because he wanted to bring Stanford-quality teaching to “the people who would never be able to come to Stanford”, he says. Following a path blazed by the open-source software movement, and by earlier open-source education initiatives, he started a project to post online free lecture videos and handouts for ten of Stanford's most popular engineering courses. His approach was fairly crude, he admits: just record the lectures, put them online and hope for the best. But to his astonishment, strangers started coming up to him and saying, “Are you Professor Ng? I've been taking machine learning with you!” He began to grasp how far online courses could reach, and started working on a scaled-up version of his system. “When one professor can teach 50,000 people,” he says, “it alters the economics of education.”

One of the many people he talked to about his work was Koller, who began developing her own online-education system in 2009. Whereas Ng looked outwards, Koller wanted to look inwards and reform Stanford's teaching on-campus. She particularly wanted to promote 'flipping', a decade-old innovation in which students listen to lectures at home and do their 'homework' in class with their teachers, focusing on the most difficult aspects or discussing a concept's wider implications. This lets the instructors concentrate on the parts of teaching most of them enjoy — interacting with the students — and relieves them of the repetitive lecturing that they often dislike.

Koller also wanted to incorporate insights from the many studies showing that passively listening to a lecture is a terrible way to learn ( F. I. M. Craik and R. S. Lockhart J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 11, 671–684; 1972 ). Following an approach pioneered by other online developers over the previous decade, Koller broke each video into 8–10-minute segments separated by pauses in which students have to answer questions or solve a problem. The idea was to get them to think about what they had learned; the deeper their engagement, studies showed, the better their retention.

Finally, to encourage greater interaction among the students themselves, Koller took a cue from social-networking sites such as Facebook and gave her system an online discussion forum. As Ng explains, the idea was to extend what happens in a face-to-face study group: “Students sit with their best friends, they work on problems together, they critique each others' solutions — lots of pedagogical studies show that these more interactive modes of student engagement result in better student learning.”

Koller and Ng eventually realized that they could achieve both their goals — outreach and on-campus reform — by pooling their efforts. In late 2010, they started work on a software platform that would support discussion forums, video feeds and all the other basic services of an online course, so that an instructor only had to provide the content. But making social interaction work on a large scale turned out to be a research project of its own, says Ng. For example, standard online discussion forums are a fine way to bring communities together — for 100 or so users. “With 100,000 it gets more complicated,” he says. Hundreds of students might end up asking the same question. So the developers implemented a real-time search algorithm that would display related questions and potential answers before a student could finish typing. Ng and Koller also let students vote items up or down, much like on the link-sharing website Reddit, so that the most insightful questions would rise to the top rather than being lost in the chatter.

The two researchers even set the system up so that students could mark one another's homework for essay questions, which computers can't yet handle. Not only is such a system essential to scaling up learning, says Koller, but it also turns out to be a valuable learning experience. And experiments have shown that if the criteria are spelled out clearly, grades given by the students correlate strongly with those given by the teacher ( R. Robinson Am. Biol. Teach. 63, 474–480; 2001 ).

By early 2011, Ng and Koller were planning to demonstrate the platform on campus, and other faculty members were paying attention. Among them was Thrun, a robotics researcher who was splitting his time between Stanford and Google in Mountain View, where he worked on the development of driverless cars.

It was Thrun's idea to go big, using a platform of his own based in part on Ng and Koller's ideas. He says that he was scheduled to teach an artificial-intelligence course that autumn, along with Peter Norvig, Google's director of research, “and I thought it was a social responsibility to take it online, so we could reach more than the 200 students we would get at Stanford”. But even he hadn't imagined how big it would get. This was the course that registered 160,000 people from 195 countries after just one public announcement, a post to an artificial-intelligence mailing list. “It shocked everybody,” he says.

In response, Ng took Koller's machine-learning course public using their platform, while department chair Jennifer Widom did the same with a database course. Each attracted roughly 60,000 students. With those numbers, venture-capital funding quickly followed.

Thrun announced his company Udacity in January 2012. Arguing that most professors don't have a clue about how to exploit the online medium, he and his colleagues elected to develop their courses in-house, working with education experts to make the pedagogy as effective as possible.

Ng and Koller announced Coursera in April 2012, and took the opposite tack. They partnered with big-name universities — Stanford and three others, to start — and let them provide the content while Coursera provided the hosting and software platform.

Anant Agarwal, former head of the computer science and artificial-intelligence laboratory at MIT, had been experimenting with online learning for a decade, developing an electric-circuit simulation package called WebSim that tried to give online students an effective substitute for hands-on laboratory experience. In December 2011, inspired by goings on at Stanford, he launched MITx: an independent, not-for-profit company that would offer massive online courses from MIT on an open-source basis. It became edX in May 2012, when Harvard joined.

At the same time, the term MOOCs, which had been circulating quietly in educational circles since it was coined in 2008, took off. Media accounts boomed, and company principals were soon giving talks at the popular Technology, Entertainment and Design (TED) conferences and the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. As Koller told one interviewer: “I can't believe my life!”

Learning curve The MOOC companies can point to plenty of success stories. For example, the 7,200 students who completed Agarwal's electric-circuits MOOC in spring 2012 included an 81-year-old man, a single mother with two children, and a 15-year-old prodigy from Mongolia who got a perfect score on the final exam. Udacity's Introduction to Computer Science MOOC, currently its most popular, has enrolled more than 270,000 students.

But MOOCs have also had some teething problems. “Many people have no idea what they're in for when they commit to put a course online,” says John Mitchell, a computer scientist and Stanford's first vice-provost of online learning. “Restructuring even one lecture into short, self-contained segments takes a fair amount of thinking.” So does coming up with good, compelling questions to engage the students between the segments. Then there is the push for high-quality production, he says. “It takes many hours to produce one hour of quality video.”

More worrisome are the MOOCs' dismal completion rates, which rarely rise above 15%. Completion has been a problem for distance learning ever since the first correspondence courses in the nineteenth century, says Dede. Only a small fraction of students have the drive and the perseverance to learn on their own, he says, and most people need help: “social support from their fellow students to help them keep going, and intellectual support from their professors and fellow students to help them figure out the material”. At the moment, says Dede, the MOOC companies' peer-to-peer communication tools don't do nearly enough to provide that kind of help. “They're just kind of hoping that people will figure out from the bottom up how to support each other,” he says.

The companies acknowledge that completion rates are a concern and that their platforms are still works in progress. “My aspiration isn't to reach the 1% of the world that is self-motivating,” says Thrun, “it's to reach the other 99%.” The companies are already working on enhanced social tools such as live video and text chat, for example.

And to observers such as David Krakauer, that is as it should be. “There are two ways to make something new,” says Krakauer, a biologist who directs the Institute for Discovery at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. “You can design something that's perfect on paper, and then try to build it. Or you can start with a system that's rubbish, experiment and build a better one with feedback. That's the Silicon Valley style — but it's also the scientific way.”

Silicon valley style A Silicon Valley sensibility permeates the three big MOOC firms. For example, they all subscribe to the open-source ideal. “Charging for content would be a tragedy,” says Ng. But they also see plenty of opportunities to make money using the 'freemium' model followed by Google and many other technology companies: give away the basic product to draw users, and then charge for premium add-ons.

One obvious add-on might be certification, says Ng. “You would get a certificate that verifies you took the course for a small fee like US$10–$30” — a potentially substantial revenue stream when enrolments are in six figures. In the future, the companies might also offer full university course credits for a fee; they are already working with accreditation agencies to arrange that.

Other possibilities include profiting from in-course mentoring services, career counseling — and charging universities for licensing. In October 2012, for example, edX licensed a circuit-theory MOOC designed by Agarwal to San Jose State University in California, where it was used as the online component of a flipped classroom experience. In return for the licensing fee, “the professors can offer the course on campus, tweak the course however they please, get access to students' grades and online activity, and all the analytics a teacher would want to see”, says Agarwal. In this particular experiment, he adds, the San Jose course's usual 40% failure rate fell to 9%.

Analytics are another example of the Silicon Valley style, potentially allowing the MOOC companies to do for education what Internet giants such as Google or Amazon have done for marketing. In Coursera's case, says Koller, the platform monitors the students' every mouse click — “quiz submissions, forum posts, when and where a student pauses a lecture video, or rewinds, or moves to 1.5 speed”.

The company is constantly using these data as feedback, says Koller, both for refining the platform's user interface and for improving the course content. If 90% of the students start stumbling over the review exercises for a certain lecture, for example, then maybe it is time to revise that lecture.

“But anything we do is just the tip of the iceberg,” says Koller. When data from individual students are multiplied by tens or hundreds of thousands of students per course, they reach a scale big enough to launch a whole new field of learning informatics — “big-data science for education”, Pea calls it.

Learning informatics could provide an unprecedented level of feedback for colleges and universities, says Stevens: “We haven't measured learning in higher education very often, very consistently or very well — ever.” Academics have endlessly studied factors that are associated with university enrolment and success, such as race, parental income and school achievement. They have also studied what happens after graduation: the higher earnings and other benefits that college confers, on average, over a lifetime.

“What we don't know is how college performs this magic,” says Stevens. “We certainly don't know the extent to which digitally mediated college experiences will deliver the same returns as a four-year residential experience.” Now, however, he and his colleagues can begin to see what education science will look like as it merges with data analytics. Instead of looking at aggregate data about students on average, for example, researchers can finally — with appropriate permissions and privacy safeguards — follow individual students throughout their university careers, measuring exactly how specific experiences and interactions affect their learning. “It's thrilling,” he says, “a huge intellectual frontier.”

What remains to be seen is how higher education will change in response to the new technology. Maybe not much, says Dede. Yes, the major universities will extend their courses beyond their own campuses; the MOOCs have already shown them that they can do so with relatively little effort and potentially large profits. But the MOOC founders' other goal — fundamental reform in on-campus teaching — is a much tougher proposition.

“Universities think of themselves as being in the university business, not the learning business,” explains Dede. That is, they mostly take their existing structures and practices as given, and look to MOOCs and other online technologies as a way to do things more cheaply. But experience with earlier innovations such as personal computing shows the limits of that approach, he says: real gains in the productivity and effectiveness of learning will not come until universities radically reshape those structures and practices to take full advantage of the technology.

No one knows exactly where that restructuring might end up. Lectures becoming a rarity, for example? Vast numbers of students getting their degrees entirely online? But the revolution has already begun, says Stevens. Major universities such as Stanford are taking the lead, “trying to integrate and embed digital learning into the fabric of the entire university” — and trying to master the new technology before it masters them.

Virtually everyone participating in this upheaval agrees on one thing. Colleges and universities will change — perhaps dramatically — but they will not disappear. “No one says that all education has to be online,” says Thrun. “Sometimes, a classroom is better.” Especially in communal endeavors such as science, “education is more than just knowledge”, says Dede. “It's abilities like leadership and collaboration, and traits like tenacity”, all of which are best learned face to face.

An unspoken irony weaves through almost every discussion about MOOCs: thanks to innovations such as flipping, online technology's most profound effect on education may be to make human interaction more important than ever. As Krakauer puts it, “what's absolutely clear is that the very large lecture hall can be completely replaced: there's no value added over watching it at home on an iPad screen with a cup of tea. But there is also no substitute for a conversation.”

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature . The article was first published on March 13, 2013.

Home — Essay Samples — Education — E-Learning — Review of the Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Their Benefits to Educational System

Review of The Massive Open Online Courses (moocs) and Their Benefits to Educational System

• Categories: E-Learning

About this sample

Words: 509 |

Published: Jan 4, 2019

Words: 509 | Page: 1 | 3 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

• Expert in: Education

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1223 words

5 pages / 2252 words

1 pages / 623 words

3 pages / 1214 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on E-Learning

The emergence of e-learning has revolutionized the way we approach education. With the advancement of technology, traditional classroom settings are no longer the sole method of learning. E-learning, also known as online [...]

Most of the college using the electronic textbook which purchase from some website or using the PowerPoint nowadays. A traditional textbook is made by hundreds of pages of information, but all of this information is being write [...]

Evaluation essays are a type of academic writing that assesses the quality, value, or effectiveness of a particular subject or topic. The purpose of this essay is to evaluate a chosen topic based on a set of criteria, and [...]

Although limitations should be in place to prevent unnecessary use of mobile phones, a 48-hour ban is not a healthy or effective solution. While prohibiting phones in the classroom may encourage students to focus on their [...]

As the modern world progresses and innovations in technology continue to expand, new challenges arise concerning the integration of these innovations into schools. Justin Banitt and his associates state that “in today’s [...]

In a study conducted on the effectiveness of the virtual classrooms and the traditional classroom, they concluded that the virtual classroom environment resulted in better mastery of course materials, greater student [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

The Impact of Massive Open Online Courses on the University Curriculum

In 2011 the phenomenon of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) emerged with great visibility and promises of access to state-of-the-art knowledge at low cost and in a flexible format. In a society with increasingly higher educational needs, MOOCs seem to provide a solution which disregards financial, geographical and academic requirements, having the student’s willingness to learn as their only prerequisite. Today MOOCs are increasing in size and number, unveiling a new educational paradigm for the time- conscious information era. As their stark difference with high-cost, comparatively inflexible university education becomes more evident, the question of the future of universities and the effect of this newfound model to their curriculum becomes more pressing. In my presentation I aim to demonstrate that university education is recognised as being more than solely a collection of modules and that the new horizons presented by MOOCs demonstrate an effective and very efficient model to achieve student engagement and information retention that must not be neglected. I will argue that MOOCs will not replace universities and that the discussions they raise go beyond that of distance versus in presence education, addressing the learning and engagement patterns of a constantly connected generation. The insights provided by MOOCs cannot be ignored and will inevitably permeate the latter’s modus operandi as it in fact already have with certain aspects of these courses such as anytime, anywhere access to courseware already gaining space within UWL, being emulated by tools such as Blackboard, UWL Replay and access to Lynda.com. It will be shown that this phenomenon should not be translated into a worry that loosely trained professionals may erode academic relevance, but that the future of academia will not be threatened by these courses, on the contrary, it will be enhanced through the appropriation of their insights. Once more education institutions are called to rethink their methods to best serve society’s needs in both the transmission and furtherance of knowledge.

Related Papers

Katharine Jewitt

A radical rethink is going on about what it means to go to an educational institution, asking profound questions about what the classroom of the future should look like and the way we should learn. Given the emerging nature of massive open online courses (MOOCs), this paper is a synthesis of critical reflections, commentaries and cautionary tales from a variety of perspectives, looking at the issues facing education and considering whether traditional teaching methods have outlived their usefulness. In times when educational institutions are facing financial cuts and student debt is increasing, some argue that free university online courses will be the saviour of education, (Koller et al, 2013). Others argue that they could destroy centuries of tradition and threaten some of the world's greatest universities (Vardi, 2012). Much research focuses on the design and categorisation of MOOCs (Clark, 2013, Downes, 2010 and Reich, 2013) and the role of the educator (Ferguson and Whitelock, 2014). This paper builds on the research by examining some of the phenomenal changes to technology-enhanced learning being brought about by new technologies and business. It summarises some of the key discourses about MOOCs, which continue to generate heated debates and divide opinions about their credibility, value and importance. I argue that any form of technology that drives engaging education, tailored precisely to the needs of individuals, and opens up education to those who cannot afford it, must be a viable alternative and challenge traditional academic institutions both to question what they offer and respond accordingly.

Adrian A Adăscăliței

— this paper describes an i-pedagogically effective sequence of topics and methods for blended learning electric circuit analysis in a MOOC (Massive Open Online Courses) structure. We show how to teach using the web, Open Educational Resources (OER), components of a course website, and the structure of the instructional process. These Virtual Learning Environments will improve student performance in engineering courses offered at Technical University Iaşi, România, and Technical University of Moldova, Chișinău, Republic of Moldova. Our web-based instructional methodology focuses on teaching this systematic problem-solving skill. The development of courseware materials for student engineers in Romania and Moldova will have an increasing impact on the national scene of engineering education. The research and development of online materials devoted to the development of human resources and human potential will accelerate the process of transfer of up-to-date technology. If new information and communication technologies are introduced in order to enhance independent / autonomous learning in the context of information society development, they can be applied both to Romania and Moldova.

Garry Jacobs , Heitor Gurgulino Souza , Janani Ramanathan , Ivo Slaus

Education is the most important catalyst of social evolution. Today higher education is in the early stages of a revolutionary transition that will have immense impact on the future of global society. This article presents an overview of perspectives explored at the World Academy's Forum on Global Higher Education conducted at the University of California at Berkeley on October 2-3, 2013. It examines issues resulting from rapid changes in educational technology and organization that impact on accessibility, affordability, quality, relevance, employability and content of higher education. It envisions establishment of a World University Consortium as a network and umbrella group to facilitate educational partnerships and linkages with other interested stakeholders at the international level, to provide a centralized source of information about latest innovative ideas and developments in this field, and to explore creative solutions to enhance the reach, quality and relevance of higher education globally.

Theresa D Neimann , Victor Wang

Informal learning is a universal current phenomenon of learning via participation, experience, or learning via student-centered knowledge creation. It stands in stark contrast with the traditional view of didactic teacher-centered learning. Online education can be regarded as a positive and self-directed form of informal learning. Whether or not deep learning takes place for the online learner is a controversial topic for many educators. This chapter will discuss the benefits and challenges of the relationship between informal online learning leading to deeper learning. But, what isn't controversial is that in this century more education has been delivered in digital platforms than in any other time in history. For most providers of education to remain highly competitive, they must engage in electronic education of some form by moving beyond the brick and mortar of the traditional classroom. Informal learning has become the impetus resulting in the extensive and intensive application of electronic education.

Habibah Ab Jalil

In the effort of expanding and improving the access of Malaysia Public Institutions of Higher Education, four pilot courses have been chosen, whereby 30% of the overall contents were developed in the form of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). This initiative is a collaborative effort between various parties at all levels to improve the quality of teaching and learning in these respective institutions. The initiative started in November 2013, with a target deployment in September 2014, taking advantage of the commencement of the first semester of 2014/2015 academic year. A research project funded by the Ministry of Education through the initiative of Malaysian Public Universities e-Learning Council (MEIPTA) was conducted simultaneously. This report laid out the key findings of the project, the lessons learnt, the outcomes of the evaluation process, and a set of recommendations based on the findings for Malaysian Higher education institutions, policy makers, and academics interested in exploring the use of MOOCs. We hope that this document will benefit all parties especially to our stakeholder, the Ministry of Education, and give us better understanding of the deployment of MOOC in the national education.

Invasion of the MOOCs: The Promises and Perils of Massive Online Open Courses

Aaron Barlow

MOOCs and Educational Challenges around Asia and Europe

Ines Gil-Jaurena

Darina Dicheva , Christo Dichev

The world is embracing an open education model. The success of this process implies an adequate awareness, an assumption that is inconsistent with recent reports and statistical facts. Despite major advances in recent years, Open Educational Resources (OER) are still not in the mainstream of Computer Science course development. Motivated by the need to fill this gap, this paper analyzes the evolution of the OER development and the emerging trends relevant to Computer Science education. The aim is to raise the awareness and promote a practical transition process towards an adequate model that aligns the interests of all stakeholders.

International Journal for Excellence in Education, 6 (2).

David Gallacher

Since the launch of a national initiative to equip all UAE federal tertiary students with iPads in 2012, there has been considerable discussion among UAE academics on the adoption of touch-screen portable devices. In contrast, there has been almost no discussion on the impact of massive open online courses (MOOCs) to higher education. Internationally this emphasis is reversing. MOOCs have the potential to upend the currently established model of higher education through the emergence of global university brands, while touchscreen mobile devices will have only marginal impact. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the potential for dramatic change in higher education is being overlooked, while academia focuses on the marginal but necessary advancements that can be made through the adoption of new devices.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Review of Higher Education, The

Brit Toven-Lindsey

Leo Havemann

Anastasios A Economides , Maria Perifanou

Western Higher Education in Asia and the Middle East: Politics, Economics, and Pedagogy

Mohanalakshmi Rajakumar

Jim Cunningham

Ignatia / Inge de Waard , Nilgun Özdamar

INTED2014 Proceedings

Nil GÖKSEL (BA, MA, PhD) , Jace Hargis

Manuel Souto-Otero , Andreia Inamorato dos Santos , Predrag Lazetic

Kenneth C Ronkowitz , Lynnette Condro Ronkowitz

Leigh-Anne Perryman

Lawrence Miller

Juliana Marques

Maurice Dawson

European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning

Karsten O Lundqvist

Catalin Cighi

Rania Adham , Karsten O Lundqvist

Menoufia University Faculty of Engineering Second International Conference (Tenth Conference of Sustainable Environmental Development) 16-20 March 2019 Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt

julian forero

Devayani Tirthali

juan domingo farnós

John Gedeon

Michael Bassis

Fiona Hollands , Devayani Tirthali

Monograph of the Convocation Lecture. Abuja: National Open University of Nigeria

Peter A. Okebukola

Tashfeen Ahmad

Stewart Marshall

อนุชัย ธีระเรืองไชยศรี

Jürgen Rudolph

Thomas Storme , Nancy Vansieleghem , Jan Masschelein

Tasha A Vice

Chris Bigum

Zachary S. Ritter , Kenneth R Roth , Adrian H Huerta, Ph.D. , Jose Luis Santos

Proceedings of the

Balakrishnan Dasarathy

Neelam Narayan

Sani M Ridwan , Sani Murtala Ridwan

Qazi Fazli Azeem

Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy Yousef

Tianchong Wang , Cher Ping LIM , Xiaoqing Gu , termit Kaur

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Home / Essay Samples / Education / Online Courses / The Impact of Massive Open Online Course in Education

The Impact of Massive Open Online Course in Education

• Category: Education
• Topic: Education System , Online Courses , Study

Pages: 5 (2337 words)

• Downloads: -->
• Massive: Enrollments are unlimited and can run into hundreds of thousands
• Open: It is open to anyone to enroll
• Online: The platform is internet based
• Course: Their goal is to teach a specific subject
• MOOCs are offered online like some online college classes
• MOOCs are often taught by the same professors that teach online college classes.
• MOOC course materials are often exactly the same as the course materials provided to college students taking online classes.
• MOOCs are sometimes offered in partnership with colleges and universities.
• MOOCs are free.
• MOOCs have unlimited class size.
• Anyone can enroll in a specific MOOC, even if they’re not “qualified” to take it.
• Students can start and stop the course at any time, without any formal consequences.
• Upon completion of the course, a student will not have a tangible or formally recognized degree, certificate or transcript of completion.
• MOOCs offer self-paced study, allowing students to complete coursework and take tests on their schedule.

Who Benefits From MOOCs?

Working professionals, business owners, lifelong learners, steps to taking a mooc, advantages of moocs, disadvantages of moocs.

• Lack of proper Introduction to course technology and format
• Course being too basic or difficult
• Course required too much time
• Workload length and difficulty of a cours
• Clunky technology and abuse on discussion boards
• Hidden cost, including required readings from expensive textbooks written by the instructor that also significantly limited student's access to learning material.
• Other non-completers were just shopping around when they registered
• Others were participating for knowledge rather than a credential

--> ⚠️ Remember: This essay was written and uploaded by an--> click here.

Found a great essay sample but want a unique one?

are ready to help you with your essay

You won’t be charged yet!

Illiteracy Essays

Critical Thinking Essays

Reading Essays

Online Classes Essays

Coaching Essays

Related Essays

We are glad that you like it, but you cannot copy from our website. Just insert your email and this sample will be sent to you.

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service  and  Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Your essay sample has been sent.

In fact, there is a way to get an original essay! Turn to our writers and order a plagiarism-free paper.

samplius.com uses cookies to offer you the best service possible.By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .--> -->