practice critical thinking free

What is the Critical Thinking Test?

Critical thinking practice test, take a free practice critical thinking test, practice critical thinking test.

Updated November 16, 2023

The Critical Thinking Test is a comprehensive evaluation designed to assess individuals' cognitive capacities and analytical prowess.

This formal examination, often referred to as the critical thinking assessment, is a benchmark for those aiming to demonstrate their proficiency in discernment and problem-solving.

In addition, this evaluative tool meticulously gauges a range of skills, including logical reasoning, analytical thinking, and the ability to evaluate and synthesize information.

This article will embark on an exploration of the Critical Thinking Test, elucidating its intricacies and elucidating its paramount importance. We will dissect the essential skills it measures and clarify its significance in gauging one's intellectual aptitude.

We will examine examples of critical thinking questions, illuminating the challenging scenarios that candidates encounter prompting them to navigate the complexities of thought with finesse.

Before going ahead to take the critical thinking test, let's delve into the realm of preparation. This segment serves as a crucible for honing the skills assessed in the actual examination, offering candidates a chance to refine their analytical blades before facing the real challenge. Here are some skills that will help you with the critical thinking assessment: Logical Reasoning: The practice test meticulously evaluates your ability to deduce conclusions from given information, assess the validity of arguments, and recognize patterns in logic. Analytical Thinking: Prepare to dissect complex scenarios, identify key components, and synthesize information to draw insightful conclusions—a fundamental aspect of the critical thinking assessment. Problem-Solving Proficiency: Navigate through intricate problems that mirror real-world challenges, honing your capacity to approach issues systematically and derive effective solutions. What to Expect: The Critical Thinking Practice Test is crafted to mirror the format and complexity of the actual examination. Expect a series of scenarios, each accompanied by a set of questions that demand thoughtful analysis and logical deduction. These scenarios span diverse fields, from business and science to everyday scenarios, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of your critical thinking skills. Examples of Critical Thinking Questions Scenario: In a business context, analyze the potential impacts of a proposed strategy on both short-term profitability and long-term sustainability. Question: What factors would you consider in determining the viability of the proposed strategy, and how might it affect the company's overall success? Scenario: Evaluate conflicting scientific studies on a pressing environmental issue.

Question: Identify the key methodologies and data points in each study. How would you reconcile the disparities to form an informed, unbiased conclusion?

Why Practice Matters

Engaging in the Critical Thinking Practice Test familiarizes you with the test format and cultivates a mindset geared towards agile and astute reasoning. This preparatory phase allows you to refine your cognitive toolkit, ensuring you approach the assessment with confidence and finesse.

We'll navigate through specific examples as we proceed, offering insights into effective strategies for tackling critical thinking questions. Prepare to embark on a journey of intellectual sharpening, where each practice question refines your analytical prowess for the challenges ahead.

This is a practice critical thinking test.

The test consists of three questions . 

After you have answered all the questions, you will be shown the correct answers and given full explanations.

Make sure you read and fully understand each question before answering. Work quickly, but don't rush. You cannot afford to make mistakes on a real test .

If you get a question wrong, make sure you find out why and learn how to answer this type of question in the future. 

Six friends are seated in a restaurant across a rectangular table. There are three chairs on each side. Adam and Dorky do not have anyone sitting to their right and Clyde and Benjamin do not have anyone sitting to their left. Adam and Benjamin are not sitting on the same side of the table.

If Ethan is not sitting next to Dorky, who is seated immediately to the left of Felix?

You might also be interested in these other PRT articles:

• Practice Tests
• Predictive Index
• Firefighter
• Hogan Assessments
• Leadership Assessment
• Ramsay Technician Assessments
• Watson-Glaser
• Raven's Progressive Matrix
• NEO Personality Inventory
• Texas Success Initiative
• Birkman Personality Test
• TSA Prep Booster™ Course
• TSA Practice Test
• TSA Written Skills Assessment
• TSA CBT X-Ray Object Recognition Test
• TSA Connect the Dots
• SHL Assessment Prep Course
• Practice Test & Answers
• SHL Practice Tests
• SHL Test Answers
• SHL Inductive Reasoning Test
• SHL Numerical Reasoning Test
• SHL Verbal Reasoning Test
• SHL Verify G+ Test
• SHL Mechanical Comprehension Test
• SHL Situational Judgment Test
• SHL OPQ Personality Test
• Predictive Index Master (Cognitive & Behavioral)
• Predictive Index Cognitive Assessment
• Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
• Predictive Index Practice Test
• Predictive Index Results
• Caliper Course
• Caliper Test Prep With Real Practice Test
• USPS Postal Exam
• Postal Exam 474
• Postal Exam 475
• Postal Exam 476
• Postal Exam 477
• USPS Postal Exam Prep
• Pass the 2024 Postal Exam With Practice Tests
• Virtual Entry Assessment (VEA)
• General Police Prep Course
• Police Situational Judgement Test
• Police Psychological Exam Course
• Massachusetts State Police Exam
• Pennsylvania Police Exam
• Philadelphia Police Exam
• Nassau County Police Exam Course
• Suffolk County Police Exam
• Correctional Officer Exam
• MTA Police Exam
• New York State Police Exam Prep Course
• School Safety Agent Course
• Police Officer NYPD Exam
• Police Fitness Prep Course
• Exam Formats
• EB Jacobs Law Enforcement Aptitude Battery
• CJBAT Study Guide
• DELPOE Police Exam
• Texas LEVEL Test With Expert Guides
• PELLETB Course
• FBI Test Phase 1 (Special Agent Exam): Guide with Practice Test [2024]
• Police Test Preparation Suite
• Pass a Polygraph Test (Lie Detector): Expert Tips & Questions – 2024
• Firefighter Test
• FDNY Firefighter Prep Course
• Firefighter Psych Test
• NFSI Firefighter Prep Course
• FCTC Firefighter Prep Course
• Firefighter Aptitude and Character Test
• FireTeam Prep Course
• Master Course
• Hogan Assessments Master Course
• Personality Courses
• Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI)
• Hogan Development Survey (HDS)
• Hogan Motives, Values & Preferences Inventory (MVPI)
• Busines Reasoning Course
• Hogan Business Reasoning Inventory (HBRI)
• Leadership Assessment Test
• GardaWorld Pre Board Primer
• Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test II (BMCT-II) Success Prep Course
• Beat the 2024 BMCT With Industry Expert Guides & Realistic Practice Tests
• 911 Dispatcher
• CHP Dispatcher
• Exam Format
• Criticall Dispatcher
• Criticall Dispatcher Test
• Criteria Cognitive Aptitude Test - CCAT Course
• Universal Cognitive Aptitude Test - UCAT Course
• CCAT Practice Test
• Criteria Pre-employment Testing: Personality, Aptitude & Skill Tests
• Korn Ferry Course
• Ace the 2024 Korn Ferry Assessment With Practice Test & Expert Guides
• Ramsay Electrical Assessment
• Ramsay Maintenance Assessment
• Ramsay Mechanical Assessment
• Ramsay Multicraft Assessment
• Ramsay Electrical Practice Test
• Ramsay Maintenance Practice Test
• Ramsay Mechanical Practice Test
• Ramsay Multicraft Practice Test
• Ramsay Test Prep
• AFOQT Study Guide
• ASTB Study Guide
• SIFT Study Guide
• Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Course
• Beat the Watson Glaser and Upgrade Your Career
• Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices
• Texas Success Initiative Course
• TSI Practice Test 2024: Math, Reading & Writing
• TSI Reading Practice Test: 15 Q&A with Explanations
• Pass our Free TSI Math Practice Test (2024 Update)
• Take our Free TSI Writing Practice Test (2024)
• Birkman Personality Course
• How it Works

Critical Thinking Test: Sample Questions with Explanations (2024)

Employers value and seek candidates who demonstrate advanced critical thinking skills. They often administer critical thinking tests as part of their hiring process. Critical thinking tests can be very difficult for those who don’t prepare. A great way to start practicing is by taking our critical thinking free practice test.

What Does The Critical Thinking Test Include?

The Critical Thinking Test assesses your capacity to think critically and form logical conclusions when given written information. Critical thinking tests are generally used in job recruitment processes, in the legal sector. These tests measure the analytical critical thinking abilities of a candidate.

Why Is Critical Thinking Useful?

Critical thinking is put into action in various stages of decision-making and problem-solving tasks:

• Identify the problem
• Choose suitable information to find the solution
• Identify the assumptions that are implied and written in the text
• Form hypotheses and choose the most suitable and credible answers
• Form well-founded conclusions and determine the soundness of inferences

What is Watson Glaser Test and what Critical Thinking Skills it Measures?

The most common type of critical thinking test is the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (W-GCTA). Typically used by legal and financial organizations, as well as management businesses, a Watson Glaser test is created to assess candidates’ critical thinking skills.

The test consists of 10 questions to be answered in 10 minutes approx (although there is no timer on the test itself). Our test is slightly harder than the real thing, to make it sufficiently challenging practice.

You need to get 70% correct to pass the test. Don’t forget to first check out the test techniques section further down this page beforehand.

Questions          25

Pass percentage          70%.

The test is broken down into five central areas:

• Assumptions
• Interpretation

Critical Thinking Course

• 1 BONUS Interview Prep Video Guide Buy this Course: Get full access to all lessons, practice tests and guides.

The Five Critical Thinking Skills Explained

1. recognition of assumption.

You’ll be presented with a statement. The statement is then followed by several proposed assumptions. When answering, you must work out if an assumption was made or if an assumption was not made in the statement. An assumption is a proclamation that an individual takes for granted. This section of the tests measures your ability to withhold from forming assumptions about things that are not necessarily correct.

• 1: Assumption Made
• 2: Assumption Not Made

Although the passage does state that Charlie’s fundraising team is doing its best so that the charity event can meet its goal, nowhere did it state that their team is leading the event.

2. Evaluation of Arguments

You will be presented with an argument. You will then be asked to decide whether the argument is strong or weak. An argument is considered strong if it directly connects to the statement provided, and is believed to be significant.

No, participation awards should not be given in every competition because studies have shown that this would cause the participants to put in less effort because they will get a prize no matter what the outcome is.

• 1: Strong Argument
• 2: Weak Argument

This is a strong argument as it provides evidence as to why participation awards should not be given in every competition

3. Deductions

In deduction questions, you will need to form conclusions based solely on the information provided in the question and not based on your knowledge. You will be given a small passage of information and you will need to evaluate a list of deductions made based on that passage. If the conclusion cannot be formed for the information provided, then the conclusion does not follow. The answer must be entirely founded on the statements made and not on conclusions drawn from your knowledge.

In a surprise party for Donna, Edna arrived after Felix and Gary did. Kelly arrived before Felix and Gary did.

• 1: Conclusion Follows
• 2: Conclusion Does not Follow

For questions like this, jot down the clues to help you out. Use initials as a quick reference.

K | F&G | E

Looking at the simple diagram, “K”, which stands for “Kelly,” arrived before Edna “E” did. The answer is A.

4. Interpretation

In these questions, you are given a passage of information followed by a list of possible conclusions. You will need to interpret the information in the paragraph and determine whether or not each conclusion follows, based solely on the information given.

A number of students were given the following advice:

“The use of powerful words is a technique, which makes you a better writer. Your choice of words is very important in molding the way people interaction with the article. You should use powerful words to spice up your article. Power words should be used liberally to enhance the flavor of what you write! ”

In the fourth sentence, it is stated, “Power words should be used liberally to enhance the flavor of what you write!”

Thus, if you were to write an essay, using powerful words can give more flavor to it.

5. Inferences

An inference is a conclusion made from observed or supposed facts and details. It is information that is not apparent in the information provided but rather is extracted from it. In this section, you will be provided with a passage of information about a specific scene or event. A list of possible inferences will then be given, and you will need to decide if they are ‘true’, ‘false’, ‘possibly true’, ‘possibly false’, or whether it is not possible to say based on the information provided.

With the advancement of technology, the need for more infrastructure has never been higher. According to the plan of the current U.S. Administration, it aims to put a $1 trillion investment on improving infrastructure, a portion of which will include priority projects and technologies that can strengthen its economic competitiveness such as transportation, 5G wireless communication technology, rural broadband technologies, advanced manufacturing technologies, and even artificial intelligence.

It stated that it expects to work with Congress to develop a comprehensive infrastructure package, which is expected to have a budget of $200 billion for certain priorities.

• 2: Probably True
• 3: Not Enough Information
• 4: Probably False

Although it was mentioned in the passage that the U.S. government is to allocate $200 billion on certain priorities, it did not specify if these certain priorities were for ‘transportation, 5G wireless communication technology, rural broadband technologies, advanced manufacturing technologies, and artificial intelligence’ or if the aforementioned priorities will have a different allocation.

What we can be sure of, however, is that at least a portion of the $1 trillion infrastructure budget will be used on the mentioned priorities regardless, meaning that there is a chance that $200 billion will be used on those aforementioned areas.

Improve Your Score with Prepterminal’s Critical Thinking Course

The Critical Thinking test is difficult, but not impossible to overcome with practice. At PrepTerminal our psychometric test experts have developed a critical thinking preparatory test to provide you with the material you need to practice for your critical thinking test. Prepare with us to increase your chance of successfully overcoming this hurdle in the recruitment process.

Prepterminal’s preparatory critical thinking course features a structured study course along with critical thinking practice tests to help you improve your exam score. Our course includes video and text-based information presented in a clear and easy-to-understand manner so you can follow along at your own pace with ease.

Created by: Matt

Psychometric tutor, prepterminal test expert, 414 students, 4.7 , 73 reviews.

• AON Hewitt G.A.T.E.
• PI Cognitive Assessment (PLI Test)
• Korn Ferry Leadership Assessment
• Berke Assessment
• Ergometrics
• Thomas International
• Predictive Index (PI)
• NEO Personality Inventory
• Leadership Assessment
• Gallup’s CliftonStrengths
• Sales Personality Tests
• Personality Management Tests
• Saville Wave
• McQuaig Word Survey
• Bell Personality Test
• Myers Briggs Personality Test
• DISC Personality Test
• Management SJT
• Supervisory SJT
• Administrative SJT
• Call Center SJT
• Customer Service SJT
• Firefighter SJT
• Numerical Reasoning Tests
• Verbal Reasoning Tests
• Logical Reasoning Tests
• Cognitive Ability Tests
• Technical Aptitude Tests
• Spatial Reasoning Tests
• Abstract Reasoning Test
• Deductive Reasoning Tests
• Inductive Reasoning Tests
• Mechanical Reasoning Tests
• Diagrammatic Reasoning Tests
• Fault Finding Aptitude Tests
• Mathematical Reasoning Tests
• Critical Thinking Tests
• Analytical Reasoning Tests
• Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test
• Criteria’s CCAT
• Matrigma Test
• Air Traffic Controller Test
• Administrative Assistant Exam
• Clerical Ability Exam
• School Secretary Tests
• State Trooper Exam
• Probation Officer Exam
• FBI Entrance Exam
• Office Assistant Exam
• Clerk Typist Test
• Police Records Clerk Exam
• Canada’s Public Service Exams
• Firefighter Exams
• Police Exams
• Army Aptitude Tests
• USPS Postal Exams
• Hiring Process by Professions

Select Page

Critical Thinking Test: Online Preparation & Free Practice Questions – 2024

• Information
• Free Example Questions

What Is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking is a form of decision making and reasoning using data and observations. Someone who is a strong critical thinker can find quality solutions efficiently and can evaluate issues objectively.

What Is a Critical Thinking Test?

Critical thinking tests provide companies valuable insight into the leadership, reasoning, and overall capabilities of candidates. Because strong critical thinking skills are highly sought after, the critical thinking test can be applicable to any field and discipline across multiple levels of expertise from recent graduate to executive. However, it is commonly administered to those applying for criminal justice and business-related occupations.

Job seekers with upcoming critical thinking tests will be evaluated on more than their ability to rationalize, critical thinking tests also measure the following subsets:

• Organizing & Planning
• Strategizing
• Decision Making
• Problem Solving

The format of the critical thinking uses hypothetical scenarios to assess candidates. The scenarios are typically relevant to the field you are interested in to assess your knowledge of the role. There will also be general questions concerning more basic issues or problems that commonly occur in a workplace environment.

The critical thinking test is multiple-choice with thirty minutes to complete the assessment. Candidates will receive a notification stating whether or not they passed within a week of completion.

How Is the Critical Thinking Test Scored?

The critical reasoning test is scored based on your raw score and your percentile in comparison with your norm group. It’s important to note that these will not be the same number.

A norm group is a collection of scores from individuals in your field at your level of experience. The percentile score is used to alert employers if you exceed, meet or miss the benchmark for the average expectations of candidates. You will be rated on a scale of one to one hundred with fifty consisting of the mean and median scores.

A raw score is simply the number of correct answers. The critical thinking test comprises your raw score based on the performance in the following areas:

• Recognizing Assumptions The candidate must be able to understand when a statement is made with no supporting evidence and how this can affect a decision. Further, candidates are asked to identify these discrepancies, whether they are stated explicitly or implicitly, and assess its relevance to the given scenario.
• Evaluating Arguments Candidates must evaluate arguments without considering inferences or being subjective. Beyond that, candidates must assess the supporting evidence, the structure of the argument and the degree of its influence. It is very important to dismiss emotions for this portion of the critical thinking test.
• Drawing Conclusions Drawing conclusions puts a large emphasis on reasoning. In this section, it’s important to assess all of the available evidence and data to form a plausible conclusion that accurately applies to all the given information. Employers also want to see candidates that will consider all possible solutions rather than making the evidence fit a desired narrative.

Employers will receive all of this information in a performance report construed by the assessment company. Employers will also be given insight into your overall potential, job knowledge, creativity and job performance per the report.

Where Will I Take a Critical Thinking Test?

Critical thinking tests are non-proctored online assessments that are typically sent via email after an initial screening. For some occupations, the company may ask that the candidate take the critical thinking test again on-site either before their final interview or during an assessment day. The most common test candidates are asked to take is the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) created by the popular assessment company, Pearson . This assessment company is on their third edition with new scoring and subsets described above. The WGCTA gained popularity because of its ability to assess a candidate’s potential alongside their aptitude. Another established assessment is the SHL Critical Reasoning Battery that contains sixty questions with a thirty-minute time limit. Both of the aforementioned critical thinking tests are multiple choice.

How to Prepare for the Critical Thinking Test?

The critical thinking test is difficult to study for because the test is designed to assess your bare knowledge and raw skills. In order to prepare successfully, it is important to focus on the areas of the test that you can equip yourself for. One aspect of the test that demands preparation is the time limit. Many candidates’ scores are negatively impacted because they skip or guess too many of the questions in an attempt to beat the clock. If you want to optimize your chances of achieving a good score, use online practice tests to acquaint yourself with the time constraint and the general theme of the questions. By utilizing the online practice tests, you can find the pace that works best for you. Another helpful way to prepare is running through sample questions. This way, you can warm-up your brain and gain an understanding of the expectations that both the test and the company have of you.

Free Sample Questions to Practice

• Look over her past quizzes to see what she missed.
• Set aside more time during the week to review the material for the quiz.
• Get to class on early Wednesday and briefly look over the chapters.
• Get a good night’s sleep.
• Parents should find an alternative way to get their kids to school next week.
• The premiums must be over-priced.
• Collective bargaining is no longer a feasible solution.
• Their employers are being unreasonable.
• People in Hawaii dislike living on an island.
• Colder climates induce more happiness than warmer climates.
• The high scores on the Alaska survey were produced by people who enjoy snow.
• People in Hawaii should move to Alaska.
• Jenny’s credit card was declined at the mall.
• Jenny’s bank keeps charging her $30 overdraft fees.
• Jenny’s check bounced when she attempted to purchase a new TV.
• Jenny spends more money than she makes.
• Lori has thirty cans of soda in a refrigerator in her garage and another fourteen sitting on the counter. Lori does not have anymore cans of soda. Therefore, Lori has 44 cans of soda.
• The accounting department loves math. My friend works in the accounting department. My friend loves math.
• Everyone southbound on the freeway yesterday was late to work. Jackie was southbound on the freeway. Jackie was late to work.
• Adrian lives in either Springfield, California, or Springfield, Illinois. If he lives in Illinois, then he is an American.

Aptitude Tests

• Aptitude Tests Guide
• Numerical Reasoning Test
• Verbal Reasoning Test
• Cognitive Ability Test
• Critical Thinking Test
• Logical Reasoning Test
• Spatial Reasoning Test
• Technical Aptitude Test
• Inductive Reasoning Test
• Analytical Reasoning Test
• Deductive Reasoning Test
• Mechanical Reasoning Test
• Non-Verbal Reasoning Tests
• Diagrammatic Reasoning Test
• Concentration Assessment Test
• Finance Reasoning Aptitude Test
• Fault Finding (Fault Diagnosis) Test
• Senior Management Aptitude Tests
• Error Checking Tests
• In-Basket Exercise

Recruiting?

• Search for:
• Verbal Aptitude Tests
• Numerical Aptitude Test
• Non-verbal Aptitude Test
• Mechanical Aptitude Tests
• Tests by Publisher
• Personality Test
• Prep Access
• Articles & News

A Critical Thinking test, also known as a critical reasoning test, determines your ability to reason through an argument logically and make an objective decision. You may be required to assess a situation, recognize assumptions being made, create hypotheses, and evaluate arguments.

What questions can I expect?

Questions are likely based on the Watson and Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal model, which contains five sections designed to assess how well an individual reasons analytically and logically. The five sections are:

Arguments : In this section, you are tested on your ability to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. For an argument to be strong, it must be both significant and directly related to the question. An argument is considered weak if it is not directly related to the question, of minor importance, or confuses correlation with causation, which is the incorrect assumption that correlation implies causation.

Assumptions : An assumption is something taken for granted. People often make assumptions that may not be correct. Being able to identify these is a key aspect of critical reasoning. A typical assumption question will present a statement and several assumptions, and you are required to identify whether an assumption has been made.

Deductions : Deduction questions require you to draw conclusions based solely on the information provided in the question, disregarding your own knowledge. You will be given a passage of information and must evaluate whether a conclusion made from that passage is valid.

Interpretation : In these questions, you are given a passage of information followed by a proposed conclusion. You must consider the information as true and decide whether the proposed conclusion logically and undoubtedly follows.

Inferences : Inference involves drawing conclusions from observed or supposed facts. It is about deducing information that is not explicitly stated but implied by the given information. For example, if we find a public restroom door locked, we infer that it is occupied.

Critical Thinking example:

Read the following statement and decide whether the conclusion logically follows from the information given.

Statement: Every librarian at the city library has completed a master’s degree in Library Science. Sarah is a librarian at the city library.

Conclusion: Sarah has completed a master’s degree in Library Science.

Does this conclusion logically follow from the statement?

Answer Options:

Explanation: Select your answer to display explanation.

The statement establishes that every librarian at the city library has completed a master’s degree in Library Science. Since Sarah is identified as a librarian at this library, it logically follows that she has completed a master’s degree in Library Science. The conclusion is a direct inference from the given information.

Where are Critical thinking tests used?

Critical thinking tests are commonly used in educational institutions for admissions and assessments, particularly in courses requiring strong analytical skills. In the professional realm, they are a key component of the recruitment process for roles demanding problem-solving and decision-making abilities, and are also utilized in internal promotions and leadership development. Additionally, these tests are integral to professional licensing and certification in fields like law and medicine, and are employed in training and development programs across various industries.

Practice Critical Thinking Test

Try a free critical thinking test. This free practice test contains 10 test questions and has a time limit of 6 minutes.

Verbal Test Prep

Verbal Test Preparation Package includes all nine verbal question categories, including:

• Critical Thinking
• Deductive Reasoning
• Verbal Reasoning
• Word Analogy

6 months access

What you get

• 1000+ verbal practice questions
• Clearly Explained Solutions
• Test statistics
• Score progression charts
• Compare your performance
• Vocabulary Trainer
• Friendly customer service
• 24/7 access on all devices

Discover how to make smart hiring decisions.

Unlock Your Potential

Improve your performance with our test preparation platform.

• Access 24/7 from all your devices .
• More than 1000 verbal practice questions.
• Solutions explained in detail.
• Keep track of your performance with charts and statistics.
• Reference scores to compare your performance against others
• Vocabulary Trainer.
• Friendly customer service.

Simplify Your Study Maximize Your Score

Get instant access to our test prep platform.

Username or email address  *

Password  *

Remember me Log in

Lost your password?

• Critical Thinking Online Courses
• The Center for Critical Thinking Community Online
• Certification Online Course

• 2019 Blog Entries
• 2020 Blog Entries
• 2021 Blog Entries
• 2022 Blog Entries
• 2023 Blog Entries
• Online Courses for Your Students
• 2023 Webinar Archives
• 2022 Webinar Archives
• 2021 Webinar Archive
• 2020 Webinar Archive
• Guided Study Groups
• Critical Thinking Channel on YouTube

Translate this page from English...

*Machine translated pages not guaranteed for accuracy. Click Here for our professional translations.

Online Critical Thinking Basic Concepts Test

Assessing the Understanding of Basic Critical Thinking Concepts and Principles Developed by Dr. Linda Elder, Dr. Richard Paul, and Dr. Rush Cosgrove

The test is a t hree -p art, 100 -i tem t est . The test can be used at the high-school level and above, and it takes approximately 45 minutes to complete.

Click Here to Purchase the Full Test Click Here to Try the Sample Test

The test is based on the substantive approach to critical thinking developed by Dr. Paul and his colleagues at the Foundation for Critical Thinking over decades of work. It is the only critical thinking test that approaches critical thinking as a trans-disciplinary system of interconnected concepts, principles, and understandings.  It focuses on the five essential dimensions of critical thinking: 1.   The analysis of thought. 2.  The assessment of thought. 3.  The dispositions of thought. 4.  The skills and abilities of thought. 5.  The obstacles or barriers to critical thought.

The test is designed for use at the high school level (grade 10) and above (college, university, and graduate level). Our online testing software has been custom-developed by the Foundation for Critical Thinking to provide comprehensive grading and reporting for both the student and teacher. The test measures the extent to which students, faculty, or, indeed, any persons understand the fundamental concepts embedded in critical thinking. A high score provides evidence of the person having done some critical thinking about critical thinking. It implies that the person is more likely to think critically than someone scoring low on the test. It measures, in other words, the necessary understandings for thinking critically . Of course, the test cannot guarantee that persons with basic critical thinking understandings will use them effectively in their lives. No critical thinking test can. The Online Critical Thinking Basic Concepts Test can assist faculty in determining the extent to which they are succeeding (or not succeeding) in helping students develop the understandings which will enable them to think critically - through course content and through problems and issues they will face in their lives. Most importantly, use of the test, especially when combined with other effective critical thinking assessment approaches, has a high degree of consequential validity . In other words, proper use of the test will lead to greater emphasis on the fundamentals of critical thinking.  For a richer understanding of assessment in critical thinking, see our white paper: Consequential Validity: Using Assessment to Drive Instruction . In this paper, we focus on the primary purpose of assessment in instruction - improvement. The purpose of assessing instruction for critical thinking is to improve the teaching of discipline-based thinking (historical thinking, biological thinking , sociological thinking , mathematical thinking, and so on). It is to improve students’ abilities to think their way through content, problems, and issues using disciplined skill in reasoning. The more particular we can be about what we want students to learn about critical thinking, the better can we devise instruction with that particular end in view. Nothing is more important in this process than our conceptualization of critical thinking, which is why we advocate a substantive, robust, trans-disciplinary conception of critical thinking. Use of this test can be an important part of the critical thinking assessment process, in providing faculty with data illuminating the extent to which students are learning or have learned the fundamentals of critical thinking. The test may also be used by administrators - for example, in connection with accreditation processes - to assess faculty understanding of critical thinking basic concepts and principles, and therefore readiness to foster critical thinking. The test provides statistical group data on the test as a whole, as well as on essential critical thinking understandings. It may be used in a pre/post format, and students may retake the test up to eight times with no additional charge per student over a four-year period. Home study teachers or companies wishing to use the test to assess employee understandings of critical thinking may also benefit from use of the test. This test is licensed for use only on this website (www.criticalthinking.org). It may not be copied, nor may it be utilized through other distribution methods. The Foundation for Critical Thinking reserves the right to modify the test in any way it deems fit and at any time.

How Is the Test Packaged and Licensed? This test is sold on a per-student basis, not per test. Each student may take the test up to 8 times over 4 years. We believe that this test is a valuable assessment, learning, and development tool when taken multiple times. Online test results are analyzed and compared over time to show one's progress in understanding core concepts of critical thinking, and to assist in the development of that understanding. We suggest a testing schedule of 2 to 4 times per year in a pre/post test format. How to Purchase the Test The test is licensed for Groups and Institutions starting with a minimum of 10 licenses per purchase. There is no setup fee for this test. An administrative account is automatically created upon purchase. Please note the total number of licenses purchased should include one license for the Administrator (e.g. if you have 50 students, you need to purchase 51 licenses in total - one for the Administrator, and one for each student.)

License orders paid by credit card are activated immediately. Payment by other methods, such as purchase order or check,  will delay activation of the test account until payment is received by the Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Please note that there is a no-refund policy on our online tests.  We therefore highly recommend that you take the sample test before purchasing the full version.

Test Administration and Features When you purchase test licenses, you are provided a set of tools in your web account to manage your students. The Group Administrator (the account that purchases the test licenses) has access to student rosters, group statistics, and the ability to customize what students can see after taking the test (allowing it to be used for assessment purposes or as online learning tool, depending on the administrator's preference). A student enrollment link is provided for the group administrator to distribute to students, along with a group password. Students are guided through a simple account setup process and then taken directly to the test.

Choosing What Students Can See After They Take the Test  

Despite the various customization options offered, administrator and student accounts are easy to set up and use.

Free Critical Thinking Practice Test with Questions, Answers, and Explanations

The questions on this free Critical Thinking practice test are a true representation of the questions you'll face on the actual Critical Thinking Aptitude Test.

These Critical Thinking sample questions were specifically chosen from our full Critical Thinking test practice pack to help improve your score and ace your pre-employment process.

Good Luck !

Free Critical Thinking Practice Questions

1. United Bank is concerned about the increasing media coverage of suspicions of corruption among its top management staff. The VP of finance was accused of embezzling ten million dollars, for which the maximum penalty is eight years in prison. The bank's attorneys advised management to offer him a plea bargain according to which he will admit to the crime, return the money plus compensation, and serve one year of community service. The VP of finance is reluctant to accept, pleading his innocence. If the VP of finance is found guilty of the charge and the judge gives him the maximum sentence, the VP of finance can be sentenced to a jail term of eight years.

A. True B. Probably True C. Insufficient Data D. Probably False E. False

Answer: The correct answer is 'True'.

The passage says: 'for which the maximum penalty is eight years in prison'. If there is a possible penalty of eight years in prison for the felony the VP is charged with, and he is found guilty, then it is possible that he would be sentenced for this period. As the statement uses the word 'can' it recognizes this is only one possibility of many. Therefore, the statement is true.

2. A new study proves that scores on cognitive ability tests, which include critical thinking tests, are strongly related to success in both civilian and military jobs, and predict outcomes in all jobs. The added value of these tests, the authors conclude, is that they predict both what an individual can do right now, as well the extent to which an individual is likely to learn and develop. Nowadays, occupational psychologists use cognitive ability tests more often than in the past.

Answer: The correct answer is 'Insufficient Data'.

The passage presents information about a new possible utility for cognitive ability tests in the occupational consultancy area. Yet, we lack information about the extent of past and present use of these tests; hence, it is impossible to determine and even to assume whether the statement is correct or not. Therefore, the correct answer is 'Insufficient Data'.

3. Following a reduction in the number of applicants, the college has been asking students to evaluate faculty teaching performance for the last two years. The college's management announced that the purpose of these evaluations is to provide information to faculty about teachers' strengths and weaknesses, and to help higher management make decisions about pay raises and promotions to reward the better teachers. Last week, Professor Burke, a recently retired senior lecturer at the college, wrote a letter in which he objected to these evaluations, claiming they compromise academic standards.

The college management does not care about academic excellence at all.

Answer: The correct answer is 'Probably False'.

This is a very definitive assertion that cannot be derived from the text. Even if the purpose of the evaluation is student satisfaction rather than trying to promote academic standards, it is very unlikely that the management does not care about academic level at all. Remember, you can use common sense and world knowledge when deciding between 'Probably' and 'Insufficient Data'.

We offer full preparation for the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal .

If you are slated to take the Watson Glaser, make sure you come prepared with one of the best practice courses available!

Read Our Reviews

Really Really Good! It was a great investment and a really good way to practice for the actual assessment. I would highly recommend for anyone looking to get some good practice before taking the test.

(Mariam S. on Watson Glaser Practice Test)

Worth the money ! Thank you for the excellent product -- I had only about a week to prepare for the test but was able to get my dream job. It's a very hard test for sure, but there were a large number of relevant test questions with clear explanations that helped a lot.

(Kyoto T. On Watson Glaser Practice Test)

If you have to do this If you have to do this test and have no knowledge of how you tackle it I thoroughly recommend this course. It puts you in the correct mindset to tackle each of the sections. Money well invested for your future.

(Ray J. on Watson Glaser + RARNA Bundle)

Evaluation of Arguments - This section asks you to evaluate arguments. There is a question followed by an argument. The argument appears to be valid, however, you have to decide whether it is a strong argument or a weak argument, meaning that it should be both important and relevant to the question. You can find more Evaluation of Arguments sample questions in the following guide or purchase JobTestPrep's full Watson Glaser preparation .

4. Retailer groups opposed to Visa and MasterCard’s $7.25 billion settlement of a lawsuit over merchant credit card fees said they have garnered support from about 1,200 businesses covered by the deal. These groups urged U.S. District Judge in Brooklyn not to grant initial approval to the settlement, however, the ruling will probably be in its favour. That could end seven years of litigation over an alleged conspiracy by the card companies and banks to fix the fees that retailers are charged when customers pay with cards.

The judge thinks that a conspiracy between the credit card companies has not occurred.

There are possible reasons for the judge to rule in favour of a settlement that have nothing to do with the judge’s own opinion on the case, like wanting to avoid further costs for both sides in an already long and expensive process. The text simply does not provide any information regarding the judge’s beliefs. Therefore, the answer is 'Insufficient Data'.

5. Virtual employees, or employees who work from home via computer, are an increasing trend. In the US, the number of virtual employees has increased 39% in the last two years and 74% in the last five years. Employing virtual workers reduces costs and makes it possible to use talented workers no matter where they are located globally. Yet, running a workplace with virtual employees might entail miscommunication and less camaraderie, and can be more time-consuming than face-to-face interaction. Today, a majority of the employees in the US are virtual employees.

The passage describes an increasing trend of virtual employment hiring. Yet, it is not specified how prevalent has this trend become in comparison to the entire work force. There is no confirmation or contradiction of the statement, and the first tendency may be to choose 'insufficient data'. However, in this section of the test, you are allowed to use common sense to choose the right answer. By applying logic to the answer choices, you can surmise that there are many jobs which cannot be done virtually, and that despite the increasing popularity of this trend, it is unlikely that a majority of employees in the US are virtual.

Therefore, the correct answer is 'Probably False'.

6. We forecast that completion of the development of supercomputers will be followed by a shortage of people who know how to make use of all this computing power. Proposed Assumption: It's only a matter of time until the development of supercomputers will be completed.

A. Assumption Made B. Assumption Not Made

Answer: Assumption not made.

The forecast does not relate to more than a hypothetical scenario (the completion of supercomputers development). It is neither certain that such a scenario will occur, nor that it is only a matter of time until it will. For example, 'we forecast that an alien invasion will force the nations of this world to work together' does not assume an alien invasion is bound to happen at some point.

Recognising Assumptions - In these types of exercises, you must recognize whether an assumption is justifiable or not. The exercises usually consist of a statement followed by an assumption about it. Your job is to identify whether this assumption is supported by the statement. Check out these Recognising Assumptions questions . Other Critical Thinking practice preps include Hogan , Watson Glaser , and RANRA .

7. Wife to husband: Our joint income is lower than it could be. But soon I will begin to work at an additional part-time job, and I will earn extra income. Proposed Assumption: The couple's expenses have increased significantly lately.

Answer: Assumption is not made.

There may be many reasons for the wife's wish to increase her household's incomes.

8. A career at DX Electronics is the best choice—it is the most stable workplace.

Proposed Assumption:

Most of DX Electronics' employees are satisfied with their current company management.

The above text does not relate to employee satisfaction in any way. It might make sense that a workplace’s employees must be satisfied for it to be stable, but one does not have to make this assumption to make this statement.

9. Ethics committee member: 'This person was the proctor at the exam during which the two students were caught allegedly cheating. Yet she claims to recognize the student who was giving the answers but not the student who was getting the answers. Therefore, the proctor's testimony should be excluded.' Proposed Assumption: If a proctor claims to recognize both parties involved in cheating, then the proctor's testimony should be included.

Answer: Assumption not made. The passage gives a reason to disqualify a proctor’s testimony, but it does not say the absence of that reason should automatically qualify the testimony. For example: If you are not an American citizen, you cannot run for president. However, if you are an American citizen, it does not necessarily mean you can run for president. There are other conditions, such as your age and the amount of time you have been an American resident.

10. About 330 marketing professionals attended this year’s Media Innovations Forum. This indicates that social media engagement is a substantial feature of brand marketing plans. Proposed Assumption: The extent of attendance in professional media forums is not negligible.

Answer: The assumption is made. Premise 1: Spotting attendance in professional forums allows one to recognise a trend or behaviour in a certain industry. Premise 2: The Media Innovations Forum is important enough to indicate trends in the marketing industry. Conclusion: Social media engagement is a substantial feature of brand marketing plans In other words: According to the above, attendance in professional forums must be significant, or else how can one use it to justify or recognise a noticeable trend in the marketing world? Remember, you are not asked to judge whether the assumption is justified, only whether the speaker had made it.

When dealing with an inference question , you must draw conclusions from observed or assumed facts. You are presented with a short text containing a set of facts with an inferred statement. On the basis of what you've read, you need to make an assessment of this statement's validity.

11. You are nervous if you are stuck in traffic. Everyone stuck in traffic is anxious.

If you are stuck in traffic, you are both anxious and nervous.

A. Conclusion follows B. Conclusion does not follows

Answer: Conclusion follows.

Stuck in traffic = A, nervous = B, anxious = C. According to the premises, if A -> B, and every A -> C, which also means A -> B + C.

The conclusion states A -> B + C.

The conclusion is the combination of the two premises; therefore, it follows.

12. In a certain recycling company that generously rewarded workers for each new client they brought in, it was found that 15 percent of the workers brought in three or more new clients last year. Among workers who had bribed clients to get their business, 25 percent brought in three or more new clients last year.

The workers that had not used bribes earned more money than the ones who did, because the bribers also lost money in the process of bringing in clients.

Answer: Conclusion does not follow. Though it makes sense, that conclusion does not follow beyond a reasonable doubt. Altogether, the workers who had used bribes may have brought more clients than those who had not, so their reward was greater even after subtracting the cost of the bribes. In addition, neither the reward nor the bribe discussed are necessarily cash-related incentives. One might bribe someone by offering free tickets to the theatre owned by his family, or give away something that is not material in nature.

13. When I go to work in the morning, I usually leave my house at 7:00 am and take the bus into the city. On rare occasions, however, I stay overnight at my aunt’s house and take the underground to work.

My workplace is in the city.

Answer: Conclusion does not follow. Although it is stated that the narrator takes the bus into the city when he goes to work, we cannot deduce, beyond a reasonable doubt, that his workplace is actually in the city. The city could just be a stop on the way to the workplace.

14. Studies conducted over the last 60 years show adult obesity and the direct medical cost thereof have increased steadily worldwide. The last decade has the highest rates of both these trends.

Adult obesity and the direct medical cost thereof have increased because fast food has become more prevalent worldwide.

Answer: Conclusion does not follow. From our general knowledge, one may infer that this statement is correct. However, it does not follow from the passage since the passage contains no indication whatsoever concerning fast food. Although fast food could be a good reason for the above-mentioned problems, there may be other reasons as well, so the conclusion does not follow.

Deduction - In this section, you must evaluate information and decide whether the conclusions drawn are justified. Based on the information you have read, a statement of facts is presented followed by a conclusion. Analyse whether the conclusions follow or contradict the statement. Improve your skills with more Deduction questions or purchase the full Watson Glaser preparation . Other Critical Thinking practice preps include Hogan , Watson Glaser , and RANRA .

15. I have a nine-month-old baby at home, and she usually agrees to be put to bed, where she falls asleep promptly. But every time her grandparents visit in the evening, she cries when I put her to bed, and she continues to cry for an hour.

My baby reacts to some changes in routine by refusing to go to sleep quietly.

Answer: Conclusion does not follow. This is a generalization which the passage does not imply. It may be the case, but there could also be many other reasons why the baby will not fall asleep easily. For example, whenever the grandparents visit, the house is noisier, so the baby cannot sleep. It is not possible to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt what the reason for the baby’s problem is.

Interpretation - Here, you evaluate the strength of different arguments in support of a particular topic. Presented to you is a short paragraph, which should be taken as fact. There is a suggested conclusion following this paragraph, which must be verified beyond a reasonable doubt. There are two options: Conclusion follows, and conclusion does not follow. Challenge yourself with more Watson Glaser Interpretation questions . Other Critical Thinking practice preps include Hogan , Watson Glaser , and RANRA .

16. Should the US government welfare program exchange the current system of food stamps, which act like cash, for a list of approved foods?

Argument: No. While fraudulent schemes using food stamps are well known and can therefore be prevented, the fraudulent schemes that undoubtedly will be used with a list of approved foods are unknown and therefore cannot be prevented.

A. Strong argument B. Weak argument

Answer: Strong argument. This argument is both important and related to the issue. If fraudulent schemes related to food stamps are currently being successfully prevented, it would not promote the general welfare of the people to change the system to one with unknown dangerous of fraud.

17. Should employees who have over five years of experience in the company be bound by law to give employers an advance notice of 60 days upon resignation?

Argument: No. Labour laws such as this one that protect employers discourage employees, making them less efficient in the workplace.

Answer: Strong argument. If you consider this argument as true, as you are required to, then this argument is strong. It is relevant to the question of whether there should be a law forcing employees to give two months’ notice before they can resign, and it is important, stating that such laws would only render employees less motivated and productive. Therefore, the argument is strong.

18. When grading tests, should teachers consider that some of their students have native-born parents and other students have immigrant parents?

Argument: No. Although some teachers may be sympathetic to students from immigrant families with financial difficulties, their grading should reflect the students’ work and abilities, regardless of ethnic or financial background.

Answer: Strong argument. Whether you agree with this argument or not, you must regard it as true. As such, it is strong. It both relates to the question directly, and raises an important claim, that grades should reflect someone’s merits, and not take into account factors such as ethnicity or socioeconomic background.

19. Should the government close ageing and polluting power stations even if the result is more energy imports?

Argument: No; importing is highly expensive, and the world-wide financial crisis has had a major impact on the government's ability to pay for such expensive schemes.

Answer: Strong argument. Like the argument in the previous question, the argument addresses one of the main issues presented in the statement—importing energy. More specifically, it addresses the reduced financial ability of the government to execute energy imports due to a world crisis. Therefore, it offers a reliable reason as to why it is probably not desirable to close local power plants.

20. Should the government allow rehabilitated convicted criminals the right to expunge their criminal record after a waiting period of five years?

Argument: Yes; expunging criminal records reduces social stigma and helps rehabilitated criminals assimilate better in society.

Answer: Strong argument. This argument is both directly related to the question and is important. It gives a substantiated reason for why expunging criminal records would have a positive effect. Therefore, it is a strong argument.

In the Critical Thinking Watson Glaser PrepPack , you will find the largest selection of practice tests, study guides and tutorials. We offer straightforward expert explanations as well as predictive score reports that show your skill level and progress. With our materials, you will be able to significantly boost your potential within a short period of time, thereby improving your chances of being hired.

Answer Index

Continue Practicing for the Critical Thinking Exam

Access more Critical Thinking Test practice tests and other valuable critical thinking test prep materials so that you take the test while being as prepared as possible:

• The Watson Glaser Practice Course -  2 full-length Watson Glaser practice test simulations and 23 extra practice drills to sharpen your abilities.
• The Complete Clifford Chance Assessment Preparation   - Prepare with 3 RANRA-style practice tests, 2 Watson Glaser-style full practice assessments and 300 practice questions and drills.
• Linklaters Watson Glaser Test - 1 Diagnostic Test, 6 Full-length Watson Glaser Simulations, 23 Specialized Practice Tests for All Five Watson Glaser Sections.
• Hogan Lovells Watson Glaser Assessment  - Full-Length Watson Glaser Simulations, Inference Drills, Deduction Drills, Arguments Drills, Interpretation Drills, Assumptions Drills.
• Combination of RANRA Watson Glaser Tests - 3 RANRA-style, 29 Watson Glaser-style, and 12 Numerical Exercises practice tests.

Since 1992, JobTestPrep has stood for true-to-original online test and assessment centre preparation. Our decades of experience make us a leading international provider of test training. Over one million customers have already used our products to prepare professionally for their recruitment tests.

• Arabic Site
• United States
• Terms & Conditions
• Refund Policy
• Affiliate Programme
• Higher Education
• Student Beans

Get 25% off all test packages.

Get 25% off all test packages!

Click below to get 25% off all test packages.

Critical Thinking Tests

• 228 questions

Critical thinking tests, sometimes known as critical reasoning tests, are often used by employers. They evaluate how a candidate makes logical deductions after scrutinising the evidence provided, while avoiding fallacies or non-factual opinions. Critical thinking tests can form part of an assessment day, or be used as a screening test before an interview.

What is a critical thinking test?

A critical thinking test assesses your ability to use a range of logical skills to evaluate given information and make a judgement. The test is presented in such a way that candidates are expected to quickly scrutinise the evidence presented and decide on the strength of the arguments.

Critical thinking tests show potential employers that you do not just accept data and can avoid subconscious bias and opinions – instead, you can find logical connections between ideas and find alternative interpretations.

This test is usually timed, so quick, clear, logical thinking will help candidates get the best marks. Critical thinking tests are designed to be challenging, and often used as part of the application process for upper-management-level roles.

What does critical thinking mean?

Critical thinking is the intellectual skill set that ensures you can process and consider information, challenge and analyse data, and then reach a conclusion that can be defended and justified.

In the most simple terms, critical reasoning skills will make sure that you are not simply accepting information at face value with little or no supporting evidence.

It also means that you are less likely to be swayed by ‘false news’ or opinions that cannot be backed with facts – which is important in high-level jobs that require logical thinking.

For more information about logical thinking, please see our article all about logical reasoning .

Which professions use critical thinking tests, and why?

Typically, critical thinking tests are taken as part of the application process for jobs that require advanced skills in judgement, analysis and decision making. The higher the position, the more likely that you will need to demonstrate reliable critical reasoning and good logic.

The legal sector is the main industry that uses critical thinking assessments – making decisions based on facts, without opinion and intuition, is vital in legal matters.

A candidate for a legal role needs to demonstrate their intellectual skills in problem-solving without pre-existing knowledge or subconscious bias – and the critical thinking test is a simple and effective way to screen candidates.

Another industry that uses critical thinking tests as part of the recruitment process is banking. In a similar way to the legal sector, those that work in banking are required to make decisions without allowing emotion, intuition or opinion to cloud coherent analysis and conclusions.

Critical thinking tests also sometimes comprise part of the recruitment assessment for graduate and management positions across numerous industries.

The format of the test: which skills are tested?

The test itself, no matter the publisher, is multiple choice.

As a rule, the questions present a paragraph of information for a scenario that may include numerical data. There will then be a statement and a number of possible answers.

The critical thinking test is timed, so decisions need to be made quickly and accurately; in most tests there is a little less than a minute for each question. Having experience of the test structure and what each question is looking for will make the experience smoother for you.

There are typically five separate sections in a critical thinking test, and each section may have multiple questions.

Inference questions assess your ability to judge whether a statement is true, false, or impossible to determine based on the given data and scenario. You usually have five possible answers: absolutely true, absolutely false, possibly true, possibly false, or not possible to determine.

Assumptions

In this section, you are being assessed on your ability to avoid taking things for granted. Each question gives a scenario including data, and you need to evaluate whether there are any assumptions present.

Here you are given a scenario and a number of deductions that may be applicable. You need to assess the given deductions to see which is the logical conclusion – does it follow?

Interpretation

In the interpretation stage, you need to read and analyse a paragraph of information, then interpret a set of possible conclusions, to see which one is correct. You are looking for the conclusion that follows beyond reasonable doubt.

Evaluation of Arguments

In this section, you are given a scenario and a set of arguments that can be for or against. You need to determine which are strong arguments and which are weak, in terms of the information that you have. This decision is made based on the way they address the scenario and how relevant they are to the content.

How best to prepare for a critical thinking test

The best way to prepare for any type of aptitude test is to practice, and critical thinking tests are no different.

Taking practice tests, as mentioned above, will give you confidence as it makes you better understand the structure, layout and timing of the real tests, so you can concentrate on the actual scenarios and questions.

Practice tests should be timed. This will help you get used to working through the scenarios and assessing the conclusions under time constraints – which is a good way to make sure that you perform quickly as well as accurately.

In some thinking skills assessments , a timer will be built in, but you might need to time yourself.

Consistent practice will also enable you to pinpoint any areas of the critical thinking test that require improvement. Our tests offer explanations for each answer, similar to the examples provided above.

Publishers of critical thinking tests

The watson glaser critical thinking test.

The Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (W-GCTA) is the most popular and widely used critical thinking test. This test has been in development for 85 years and is published by TalentLens .

The W-GCTA is seen as a successful tool for assessing cognitive abilities, allowing recruiting managers to predict job success, find good managers and identify future leaders. It is available in multiple languages including English, French and Spanish.

The test itself can be used as part of an assessment day or as a screening assessment before an interview. It consists of 40 questions on the 5 sections mentioned above, and is timed at 30 minutes. Click here for more information on Watson Glaser tests .

SHL critical reasoning test

SHL is a major aptitude test publisher, which offers critical thinking as part of its testing battery for pre-employment checks.

SHL tests cover all kinds of behavioural and aptitude tests, from logic to inference, verbal to numerical – and with a number of test batteries available online, they are one of the most popular choices for recruiters.

Cornell critical thinking test

The Cornell critical thinking test was made to test students and first developed in 1985. It is an American system that helps teachers, parents and administrators to confidently predict future performance for college admission, gifted and advanced placement programs, and even career success.

Prepare yourself for leading employers

5 Example critical thinking practice questions with answers

In this section, you need to deduce whether the inferred statement is true, false or impossible to deduce.

The UK Government has published data that shows 82% of people under the age of 30 are not homeowners. A charity that helps homeless people has published data that shows 48% of people that are considered homeless are under 30.

The lack of affordable housing on the sales market is the reason so many under-30s are homeless.

• Definitely True
• Probably True
• Impossible to Deduce
• Probably False
• Definitely False

The information given does not infer the conclusion given, so it is impossible to deduce if the inference is correct – there is just not enough information to judge the inference as correct.

The removal of the five-substitution rule in British football will benefit clubs with a smaller roster.

Clubs with more money would prefer the five-substitute rule to continue.

• Assumption Made

Assumption Not Made

This is an example of a fallacy that could cause confusion for a candidate – it encourages you to bring in any pre-existing knowledge of football clubs.

It would be easy to assume the assumption has been made when you consider that the more money a club has, the more players they should have on the roster. However, the statement does not make the assumption that the clubs with more money would prefer to continue with the five-substitute rule.

All boys love football. Football is a sport, therefore:

• All boys love all sports
• Girls do not love football
• Boys are more likely to choose to play football than any other sport

In this section we are looking for the conclusion that follows the logic of the statement. In this example, we cannot deduce that girls do not love football, because there is not enough information to support that.

In the same way the conclusion that all boys love all sports does not follow – we are not given enough information to make that assumption. So, the conclusion that follows is 3: boys are more likely to choose football than any other sport because all boys like football.

The British Museum has a range of artefacts on display, including the largest privately owned collection of WWII weaponry.

There is a larger privately owned collection of WWII weaponry in the USA.

• Conclusion Follows

Conclusion Does Not Follow

The fact that the collection is in the British Museum does not make a difference to the fact it is the largest private collection – so there cannot be a larger collection elsewhere.

The Department for Education should lower standards in examinations to make it fairer for less able students.

• Yes – top grades are too hard for lower-income students
• No – less fortunate students are not capable of higher standards
• Yes – making the standards lower will benefit all students
• No – private school students will suffer if grade standards are lower
• The strongest argument is the right answer, not the one that you might personally believe.

In this case, we need to assess which argument is most relevant to the statement. Both 1 and 4 refer to students in particular situations, which isn’t relevant to the statement. The same can be said about 2, so the strongest argument is 3, since it is relevant and addresses the statement given.

Sample Critical Thinking Tests question Test your knowledge!

What implication can be drawn from the information in the passage?

A company’s internal audit revealed that departments with access to advanced analytics tools reported higher levels of strategic decision-making. These departments also showed a higher rate of reaching their quarterly objectives.

• Strategic decision-making has no link to the achievement of quarterly objectives.
• Access to advanced analytics does not influence a department's ability to make strategic decisions.
• Advanced analytics tools are the sole reason for departments reaching their quarterly objectives.
• Departments without access to advanced analytics tools are unable to make strategic decisions.
• Advanced analytics tools may facilitate better strategic decision-making, which can lead to the achievement of objectives.

After reading the passage below, what conclusion is best supported by the information provided?

• Job satisfaction increases when employees start their day earlier.
• Starting early may lead to more efficient task completion and less job-related stress.
• Workers who start their day later are more efficient at completing tasks.
• There is a direct correlation between job satisfaction and starting work early.
• The study concludes that job-related stress is unaffected by the start time of the workday.

Based on the passage below, which of the following assumptions is implicit?

• Inter-departmental cooperation is the sole factor influencing project completion rates.
• The increase in project completion rates is due entirely to the specialized team-building module.
• Team-building exercises have no effect on inter-departmental cooperation.
• The specialized team-building module may contribute to improvements in inter-departmental cooperation.
• Departments that have not undergone the training will experience a decrease in project completion rates.

What is the flaw in the argument presented in the passage below?

• The assumption that a casual dress code is suitable for all company types.
• High-tech companies have a casual dress code to increase employee productivity specifically.
• The argument correctly suggests that a casual dress code will increase employee morale in every company.
• Morale and productivity cannot be affected by a company's dress code.
• A casual dress code is more important than other factors in determining a company's success.

Which statement is an inference that can be drawn from the passage below?

• Telecommuting employees are less productive than on-site workers.
• The reduction in operational costs is directly caused by the increase in telecommuting employees.
• Telecommuting may have contributed to the decrease in operational costs.
• Operational costs are unaffected by employee work locations.
• The number of telecommuting employees has no impact on operational costs.

Start your success journey

Access one of our Watson Glaser tests for FREE.

Within two hours of practice I have improved my score from 50% correct to 88%.

Joseph used Practice Aptitude Tests to improve his numerical reasoning scores.

Hire better talent

At Neuroworx we help companies build perfect teams

Critical Thinking Tests Tips

The most important factor in your success will be practice. If you have taken some practice tests, not only will you start to recognise the way questions are worded and become familiar with what each question is looking for, you will also be able to find out whether there are any parts that you need extra practice with.

It is important to find out which test you will be taking, as some generic critical thinking practice tests might not help if you are taking specific publisher tests (see the section below).

2 Fact vs fallacy

Practice questions can also help you recognise the difference between fact and fallacy in the test. A fallacy is simply an error or something misleading in the scenario paragraph that encourages you to choose an invalid argument. This might be a presumption or a misconception, but if it isn’t spotted it can make finding the right answer impossible.

3 Ignore what you already know

There is no need for pre-existing knowledge to be brought into the test, so no research is needed. In fact, it is important that you ignore any subconscious bias when you are considering the questions – you need logic and facts to get the correct answer, not intuition or instinct.

4 Read everything carefully

Read all the given information thoroughly. This might sound straightforward, but knowing that the test is timed can encourage candidates to skip content and risk misunderstanding the content or miss crucial details.

During the test itself, you will receive instructions that will help you to understand what is being asked of you on each section. There is likely to be an example question and answer, so ensure you take the time to read them fully.

5 Stay aware of the time you've taken

This test is usually timed, so don’t spend too long on a question. If you feel it is going to take too much time, leave it and come back to it at the end (if you have time). Critical thinking tests are complex by design, so they do have quite generous time limits.

For further advice, check out our full set of tips for critical thinking tests .

Prepare for your Watson Glaser Assessments

Immediate access. Cancel anytime.

• 20 Aptitude packages
• 59 Language packages
• 110 Programming packages
• 39 Admissions packages
• 48 Personality packages
• 315 Employer packages
• 34 Publisher packages
• 35 Industry packages
• Dashboard performance tracking
• Full solutions and explanations
• Tips, tricks, guides and resources
• Access to free tests
• Basic performance tracking
• Solutions & explanations
• Tips and resources

Critical Thinking Tests FAQs

What are the basics of critical thinking.

In essence, critical thinking is the intellectual process of considering information on its merits, and reaching an analysis or conclusion from that information that can be defended and rationalised with evidence.

How do you know if you have good critical thinking skills?

You are likely to be someone with good critical thinking skills if you can build winning arguments; pick holes in someone’s theory if it’s inconsistent with known facts; reflect on the biases inherent in your own experiences and assumptions; and look at problems using a systematic methodology.

Reviews of our Watson Glaser tests

What our customers say about our Watson Glaser tests

Jozef Bailey

United Kingdom

April 05, 2022

Doesn't cover all aspects of Watson-Glaser tests but useful

The WGCTA uses more categories to assess critical thinking, but this was useful for the inference section.

April 01, 2022

Just practicing for an interview

Good information and liked that it had a countdown clock, to give you that real feel in the test situation.

Jerico Kadhir

March 31, 2022

Aptitude test

It was OK, I didn't understand personally whether or not the "cannot say" option was acceptable or not in a lot of the questions, as it may have been a trick option.

Salvarina Viknesuari

March 15, 2022

I like the test because the platform is simple and engaging while the test itself is different than most of the Watson Glaser tests I've taken.

Alexis Sheridan

March 02, 2022

Some of the ratios were harder than I thought!

I like how clear the design and layout is - makes things very easy (even if the content itself is not!)

Cyril Lekgetho

February 17, 2022

Mental arithmetic

I enjoyed the fact that there were multiple questions pertaining to one passage of information, rather than multiple passages. However I would've appreciated a more varied question type.

Madupoju Manish

February 16, 2022

Analytics are the best questions

I like the test because of its time schedule. The way the questions are prepared makes it easy to crack the original test.

Chelsea Franklin

February 02, 2022

Interesting

I haven't done something like this for ages. Very good for the brain - although I certainly experienced some fog whilst doing it.

[email protected]

January 04, 2022

Population/exchange rates were the hardest

Great test as it felt a bit time pressured. Very different types of questions in terms of difficulty.

faezeh tavakoli

January 02, 2022

More attention to detail + be more time conscious

It was asking about daily stuff we all deal with, but as an assessment it's scrutinising how we approach these problems.

By using our website you agree with our Cookie Policy.

This is a free sample version of our critical thinking tests.

• Upgrade to see more

• Numerical Reasoning
• Verbal Reasoning
• Inductive Reasoning
• Diagrammatic Reasoning
• Logical Reasoning
• Mechanical Reasoning
• Situational Judgement
• Deductive reasoning
• Critical thinking
• Spatial reasoning
• Error checking
• Verbal comprehension
• Reading comprehension
• Psychometric tests
• Personality test
• In-Tray exercise
• E-Tray exercise
• Group exercise
• Roleplay exercise
• Presentation exercise
• Analysis exercise
• Case study exercise
• Game based assessments
• Competency based assessment
• Strengths based assessment
• Strengths based interview
• Video interview
• Saville Assessment
• Talent Q / Korn Ferry
• Watson Glaser
• Test Partnership
• Clevry (Criterion)
• Criteria Corp
• Aon / Cut-e
• Sova Assessment

Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Tests

Complex and challenging critical thinking tests, including the Watson-Glaser, are used mostly by law firms.

Page contents:

About critical thinking tests and how they work, free practice critical thinking test, the watson glaser critical thinking appraisal, what is measured by a watson glaser critical thinking test, what should i know before taking a watson glaser critical thinking test, major publishers' critical thinking tests, advice for all critical thinking tests, assessmentday's practice tests can help you to prepare for a critical thinking test, one final point, other test publishers.

Updated: 08 September 2022

Critical thinking tests, or critical reasoning tests, are psychometric tests used in recruitment at all levels, graduate, professional and managerial, but predominantly in the legal sector. However, it is not uncommon to find companies in other sectors using critical thinking tests as part of their selection process. This is an intense test, focusing primarily on your analytical, or critical thinking, skills. Some tests are still conducted by paper and pen, but, just like other psychometric tests, critical thinking tests are mostly administered online at home or on a computer at a testing center.

The questions are multiple choice, and these choices and the style of questions are explained in more detail further down the page. The tests will often follow these two common timings:

• 30 questions with a 40 minute time limit
• 80 questions with a 60 minute time limit

Critical Thinking can be defined in many ways and an exact description is disputed, however, most agree on a broad definition of critical thinking, that 'critical thinking involves rational, purposeful, and goal-directed thinking...by using certain cognitive skills and strategies.' An absence or lack of critical thinking skills at times may lead us to believe things which aren't true, because we haven't sufficiently analysed and criticized the information we've received or used this to formulate and independently test our own theories, arguments and ideas. These are all examples of critical thinking skills put into practice. Glaser (An Experiment in the Development of Critical Thinking, 1941) stated that to think critically involved three key parts:

• An attitude of being disposed to consider in a thoughtful way the problems and subjects that come within the range of one's experiences
• Knowledge of the methods of logical inquiry and reasoning
• Some skill in applying those methods

Note: AssessmentDay and its products are not affiliated with Pearson or TalentLens. Our practice tests are for candidates to prepare for the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal; we do not sell tests for employers to select candidates.

Free Critical Thinking Test

Here, we have a full critical thinking test for you to practice for free. You can dive straight in and practice the full test (in blue at the bottom), or tackle each individual section one at a time.

All answers and explanations are included at the end of the test, or alternatively you can download the Solutions PDF. Each test has been given a generous time limit.

Critical Thinking Test 1

• 40 questions

Critical Thinking Test 2

Critical thinking test 3, critical thinking test 4.

TalentLens' Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) is the most common critical thinking test. You can visit their official site here: Watson Glaser . Most other critical thinking tests are based on the Watson Glaser format. More than 90 years' of experience have led to many modifications and improvements in the test.

The Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal is widely regarded as a good predictor of work productivity and at identifying candidates with a good potential to become managers and occupy other positions as a senior member of staff. The latest edition of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test has improved its validity, appealed more to businesses by focusing on business-relevant topics, switched to the Item Response Theory (IRT) for its scoring, updated norm groups, and integrated anti-cheat measures by having an online retest, which can be used to validate results.

Developed by Goodwin Watson and Edward Glaser, the Watson Glaser test is favored by law firms , keen to measure people's abilities to reason, reach conclusions and know when leaps in logic have been made. Skills which are required in the legal sector. The questions in each of the 5 sections aims to evaluate the candidate's ability to:

• 1. Arrive at correct inferences
• 2. Identify when an assumption has been made
• 3. Use deductive reasoning
• 4. Reach logical conclusions
• 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of arguments

Did You Know

The most recent revision of the W-GCTA was published in 2011 with notable improvements being better face validity and business-relevant items, scoring based on Item Response Theory (IRT), updated norm groups, and an online retest which can be used to validate a paper and pencil test result.

A Critical thinking tests assesses your ability in 5 key areas mentioned above; assumptions, arguments, deductions, inferences and interpreting information. Often in this order. A short paragraph of text a few sentences long or a single sentence is used as a starting point. This passage will contain information which you will base your answer to the question on. Another sentence is then presented to you and you will be asked to judge something about this sentence based on the information in the short paragraph. The five sections are explained in more detail here:

• Assumptions - You are being asked to state whether the information in the second set of text you are presented is an assumption made in the first paragraph. Quite a tricky concept to get your head around at first. In a nutshell, when people speak or make arguments, there are underlying assumptions in those arguments. Here you are presented with some assumptions and are asked to judge if that is being made in the original statement. For example in the statement "only people earning a high salary can afford a fast car," what's being assumed is that fast cars are expensive because only people who are earning a lot of money can buy one, however, what's not being assumed is that people without high salaries aren't legally allowed to buy a fast car. You are asked to choose whether an assumption has been made or has not been made.
• Arguments - You are presented with an argument, such as "Should college fees be abolished?" Regardless of your own opinions and thoughts on the argument, you are then presented with statements related to this original argument. You are asked to say whether the responses to the original argument of "Should college fees be abolished?" make for strong or weak arguments. Arguments are considered strong if they are related to the topic such as, "Yes, many people who would benefit from a college education do not because they cannot afford it. This hurts the country's economic growth." The argument presented is sound, related to the original question. Compare this with a weak argument, "No, I do not trust people who read a lot of books." It is clear that the second argument bears very little relation to the subject of the abolition of college tuition fees. This is not to say that an argument against the original argument will always be a weak one, or that an argument in favor will always be a strong one. For example, "Yes, I like people that read books," is in favor of the abolition as indicated by "yes," but that person's like or dislike of others that read books isn't related, or hasn't been explained how it's related to removing the fees. Carefully considering what is being said, remove it from your own personal opinions and political views to objectively analyse what someone else has put forward.
• Deductions - A few sentences of information are presented to you. Another separate short statement will also be shown to you, which is supposed to represent a conclusion that someone has reached. You will have to determine whether this conclusion logically follows from the information given to you. Can the statement be deduced from the information available>? If so, and without a doubt, then the conclusion follows, if not, then the conclusion does not follow. Your decision must be based on the information given and not from your own knowledge.
• Inferences - A short scenario is described to you, followed by possible inferences. The inferences are short statements. Imagine that these are what people have said is inferred from the scenario. Use your judgement and the short scenario to assess whether what's being said has actually been inferred from the passage and the likelihood of this inference. You are asked to rank each inference as either 'true,' 'false,' 'possibly true,' 'possibly false.' For some proposed inferences there isn't enough information to say either 'true' or 'false' so a fifth option is included; 'more information required.' You can only select one option from the five.
• Interpreting Information - Following a similar format to the previous four sections, a short passage of information and then a series of statements are shown to you. You are asked to judge whether the information in the passage can be interpreted as the statements suggest. The answer options are straightforward here; you either select 'conclusion follows,' or 'conclusion does not follow,' depending on whether or not you believe that the statement can be logically reached from the information given. Again, for this section and all others, you are to base your choice of answer on what you're given, not on any specialized knowledge you might have.

If a watson glaser critical thinking test is used in the early stages of the application process it's likely to be used as a screening tool. This puts some pressure on candidates to meet a minimum pass mark, which will allow them to be selected to go on to the next stage of the selection process. If it's used at a later stage in the process, the results from this will be combined with performance in other assessments, tests, exercises and interviews. All the information you need to answer the questions will be in the test. Below the details of a few companies' critical thinking tests are pointed out.

Here is a list of critical reasoning tests on the market at present, which candidates may be likely to encounter for recruitment, selection or development.

• W-GCTA - The Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal as it is formally called is the most ubiquitous critical thinking test out there. This is the one that you are most likely to encounter.
• GMAT - The general management aptitude test, used by business schools and colleges test students' critical thinking ability. The critical thinking questions are written in a business or finance context.
• SHL - SHL have produced the Critical Reasoning Test Battery composed of 60 critical reasoning questions with a strict time limit of 30 minutes.
• Cornell - Cornell have developed a critical thinking test to be used in educational environments. The two levels, X and Z, are aimed at children and adults, respectively.
• Area-specific - There are tests which focus on either numerical critical reasoning skills and verbal critical reasoning skills. These tests will ask only numerical or only verbal questions to assess your skills in a specific area.

Here is some general advice to help you perform to the best of your ability for your critical reasoning test.

• No prior knowledge - The key point here is that critical reasoning tests are measuring your ability to think, or the method that you use to reach a conclusion. You should therefore not rely on prior knowledge to answer the question. Questions will be written so that you do not need to know any specialist knowledge to answer the question. For example, you will not be expected to know mathematical formulas or laws of nature and to answer questions with that information. If you are given the formula and its description in the questions, you are expected to use that information to reach the answer.
• Carefully read the instructions - There are 5 sections to most critical thinking tests and each will assess a slightly different skill. Make sure you have read the instructions and understand what it is you are expected to do to answer the questions for this section. There is quite a difference between the Assumptions section and the Deductions section for example. Applying the rules of one to the other would lead to just guessing the answers and making many mistakes.
• Keep your eye on the timer - These tests are complex. You might find yourself fixated on answering one question and taking up a lot of the time you are allowed. Checking how much time you have every so often can help you to more evenly distribute your time between the questions. This is done to avoid spending too much time on one question when that time would be better spent answering more or checking your answers. This time management applies to all tests, but is particularly important with Critical Thinking tests, as many people believe they have such a large amount of time, but underestimate the number of questions they have to answer.
• Logical fallacies - Identifying logical fallacies is key to many parts of this test, and researching the difference between sound and fallacious logic will prove helpful in a critical reasoning test. A fallacy is an error in reasoning due to a misconception or a presumption, and an argument which employs a formal fallacy, logical fallacy or a deductive fallacy in its reasoning becomes an invalid argument. Researching the different types of fallacy (i.e. red herring argument, straw man argument, confusing correlation and causation etc.) can help you spot these in the test and correctly answer the question.

The practice tests that we have cover all of the sections of the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking test and these overlap with many of the variations in Critical Thinking tests produced by major publishers. practice helps to increase your confidence, gives you a chance to learn from your mistakes in a risk-free environment, and can reduce stress before an exam.

The best place to get advice on taking a critical thinking tests is the test publisher's website, for example this one for the Watson Glaser .

If you have already successfully passed a few initial stages of the application process, it's unlikely that companies will focus solely on your results in the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking test when deciding whether or not to hire you. This type of selection by results on one test is more likely if it is part of the early stages of the process. However, towards the later stages the company will look at your results across interviews, group exercises, other aptitude tests and your résumé and will collate all of this information before reaching a decision. If you have been invited to undertake a critical reasoning test then the organisation clearly has an interest in hiring you, let that fact inspire confidence and perform to the best of your ability on your test, good luck!

You may also be interested in these popular tests sections.

JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser.

• Order Tracking
• Create an Account

200+ Award-Winning Educational Textbooks, Activity Books, & Printable eBooks!

• Compare Products

Reading, Writing, Math, Science, Social Studies

• Search by Book Series
• Algebra I & II  Gr. 7-12+
• Algebra Magic Tricks  Gr. 2-12+
• Algebra Word Problems  Gr. 7-12+
• Balance Benders  Gr. 2-12+
• Balance Math & More!  Gr. 2-12+
• Basics of Critical Thinking  Gr. 4-7
• Brain Stretchers  Gr. 5-12+
• Building Thinking Skills  Gr. Toddler-12+
• Building Writing Skills  Gr. 3-7
• Bundles - Critical Thinking  Gr. PreK-9
• Bundles - Language Arts  Gr. K-8
• Bundles - Mathematics  Gr. PreK-9
• Bundles - Multi-Subject Curriculum  Gr. PreK-12+
• Bundles - Test Prep  Gr. Toddler-12+
• Can You Find Me?  Gr. PreK-1
• Complete the Picture Math  Gr. 1-3
• Cornell Critical Thinking Tests  Gr. 5-12+
• Cranium Crackers  Gr. 3-12+
• Creative Problem Solving  Gr. PreK-2
• Critical Thinking Activities to Improve Writing  Gr. 4-12+
• Critical Thinking Coloring  Gr. PreK-2
• Critical Thinking Detective  Gr. 3-12+
• Critical Thinking Tests  Gr. PreK-6
• Critical Thinking for Reading Comprehension  Gr. 1-5
• Critical Thinking in United States History  Gr. 6-12+
• CrossNumber Math Puzzles  Gr. 4-10
• Crypt-O-Words  Gr. 2-7
• Crypto Mind Benders  Gr. 3-12+
• Daily Mind Builders  Gr. 5-12+
• Dare to Compare Math  Gr. 2-7
• Developing Critical Thinking through Science  Gr. 1-8
• Dr. DooRiddles  Gr. PreK-12+
• Dr. Funster's  Gr. 2-12+
• Editor in Chief  Gr. 2-12+
• Fun-Time Phonics!  Gr. PreK-2
• Half 'n Half Animals  Gr. K-4
• Hands-On Thinking Skills  Gr. K-1
• Inference Jones  Gr. 1-6
• James Madison  Gr. 10-12+
• Jumbles  Gr. 3-5
• Language Mechanic  Gr. 4-7
• Language Smarts  Gr. 1-4
• Mastering Logic & Math Problem Solving  Gr. 6-9
• Math Analogies  Gr. K-9
• Math Detective  Gr. 3-8
• Math Games  Gr. 3-8
• Math Mind Benders  Gr. 5-12+
• Math Ties  Gr. 4-8
• Math Word Problems  Gr. 4-10
• Mathematical Reasoning  Gr. Toddler-11
• Middle School Science  Gr. 6-8
• Mind Benders  Gr. PreK-12+
• Mind Building Math  Gr. K-1
• Mind Building Reading  Gr. K-1
• Novel Thinking  Gr. 3-6
• OLSAT® Test Prep  Gr. PreK-K
• Organizing Thinking  Gr. 2-8
• Pattern Explorer  Gr. 3-9
• Practical Critical Thinking  Gr. 8-12+
• Punctuation Puzzler  Gr. 3-8
• Reading Detective  Gr. 3-12+
• Red Herring Mysteries  Gr. 4-12+
• Red Herrings Science Mysteries  Gr. 4-9
• Science Detective  Gr. 3-6
• Science Mind Benders  Gr. PreK-3
• Science Vocabulary Crossword Puzzles  Gr. 4-6
• Sciencewise  Gr. 4-12+
• Scratch Your Brain  Gr. 2-12+
• Sentence Diagramming  Gr. 3-12+
• Smarty Pants Puzzles  Gr. 3-12+
• Snailopolis  Gr. K-4
• Something's Fishy at Lake Iwannafisha  Gr. 5-9
• Teaching Technology  Gr. 3-12+
• Tell Me a Story  Gr. PreK-1
• Think Analogies  Gr. 3-12+
• Think and Write  Gr. 3-8
• Think-A-Grams  Gr. 4-12+
• Thinking About Time  Gr. 3-6
• Thinking Connections  Gr. 4-12+
• Thinking Directionally  Gr. 2-6
• Thinking Skills & Key Concepts  Gr. PreK-2
• Thinking Skills for Tests  Gr. PreK-5
• U.S. History Detective  Gr. 8-12+
• Understanding Fractions  Gr. 2-6
• Visual Perceptual Skill Building  Gr. PreK-3
• Vocabulary Riddles  Gr. 4-8
• Vocabulary Smarts  Gr. 2-5
• Vocabulary Virtuoso  Gr. 2-12+
• What Would You Do?  Gr. 2-12+
• Who Is This Kid? Colleges Want to Know!  Gr. 9-12+
• Word Explorer  Gr. 6-8
• Word Roots  Gr. 3-12+
• World History Detective  Gr. 6-12+
• Writing Detective  Gr. 3-6
• You Decide!  Gr. 6-12+

• Special of the Month
• Sign Up for our Best Offers
• Bundles = Greatest Savings!
• Sign Up for Free Puzzles
• Sign Up for Free Activities
• Toddler (Ages 0-3)
• PreK (Ages 3-5)
• Kindergarten (Ages 5-6)
• 1st Grade (Ages 6-7)
• 2nd Grade (Ages 7-8)
• 3rd Grade (Ages 8-9)
• 4th Grade (Ages 9-10)
• 5th Grade (Ages 10-11)
• 6th Grade (Ages 11-12)
• 7th Grade (Ages 12-13)
• 8th Grade (Ages 13-14)
• 9th Grade (Ages 14-15)
• 10th Grade (Ages 15-16)
• 11th Grade (Ages 16-17)
• 12th Grade (Ages 17-18)
• 12th+ Grade (Ages 18+)
• Test Prep Directory
• Test Prep Bundles
• Test Prep Guides
• Preschool Academics
• Store Locator
• Submit Feedback/Request
• Sales Alerts Sign-Up
• Technical Support
• Mission & History
• Articles & Advice
• Testimonials
• Our Guarantee
• New Products
• Free Activities
• Libros en Español

Free Critical Thinking Quizzes!

Award-Winning Critical Thinking Products!

Want More Critical Thinking Quiz Questions? Test your knowledge with questions from our award-winning titles below.

1) You have only an 8-liter jug and a 3-liter jug. Both containers are unmarked. You need exactly 4 liters of water.

How can you get it, if a water faucet is handy? Question from Classroom Quickies •  Show/Hide Solution

2) What can you add to 1,000,000 and always get more than if you multiplied the 1,000,000 by the same value?

Question from Scratch Your Brain  •  Show/Hide Solution

3) Determine the common saying depicted in these verbal picture puzzles.

a. DECI     SION b. ANOTHER     ONE Question from Think-A-Grams  •  Show/Hide Solution

4) What is the 50th number in this sequence?

Explain how you got your answer. 5, 11, 17, 23, 29, 35, 41, … Question from Dr. Funster’s Think-A-Minutes  •  Show/Hide Solution

5) Determine both one-word answers.

The floor of ship or boat, They walk on me at sea; Where there’s a C, make it an S, At school you sit on me. What am I? _______________ Question from Spelling DooRiddles  •  Show/Hide Solution

6) The reason he gave the press for leaving his job was illness and fatigue. That wasn’t exactly the truth and it wasn’t exactly a lie.

Why did he leave? Question from Red Herring Mysteries  •  Show/Hide Solution

7) Determine both one-word answers.

Another word for sick, Your forehead is quite hot; Now put an H in front, A mountain I am not. What am I?______________ Question from Spelling DooRiddles  •  Show/Hide Solution

8) Use the clues to solve the puzzle.

A duck, a goose, a goat, and a horse all entered the barn at different times one day last week. a. A mammal entered the barn first. b. The duck entered before the goose. c. The goose entered ahead of the horse. Who entered the barn first? ____________ Question from Dr. Funster’s Creative Thinking Puzzlers  •  Show/Hide Solution

9) Determine the common term or phrase depicted in these verbal picture puzzles.

a. CHIEDITOREF b. T   2222 Question from Think-A-Grams  •  Show/Hide Solution

10) Use the addition, subtraction, multiplication and division symbols once each to make these equations true.

a. 600 __ 200 __ 400 __ 300 __ 200 = 200 b. 200 __ 300 __ 600 __ 400 __ 200 = 200 Question from Dr. Funster’s Quick Thinks Math  •  Show/Hide Solution

11) While relaxing on the deck outside her cabin one summer evening, Vivian fell into a deep trance-like sleep. When she awoke, she felt as if she had slept only an hour or two, but it was now the middle of winter.

How could this be? Question from Red Herring Mysteries  •  Show/Hide Solution

12) What do you get when a math teacher is a magician? ________________

Answers to Questions: 1) Fill the 3-liter jug three times, each time dumping the water from it into the 8-liter jug. The third time, this will leave one liter of water in the 3-liter jug, and the 8-liter jug will be filled. Dump the water from the 8-liter jug down the drain, and then empty the one liter of water from the 3-liter jug into the 8-liter jug. Now fill the 3-liter jug again and dump the water into the 8-liter jug. The 8-liter jug now contains 4 liters of water. Various answers are possible. 2) zero, or any fraction less than a whole, or any negative number 3) a. split decision; b. one after another 4) 299. The pattern involves a difference of 6 between adjacent terms of the sequence. Add 6 to 5, getting 11, then add 6 to 11, getting 17, then add 6 to 17, getting 23, etc., until 6 has been added 50 times, ending in 299. Answer explanations will vary. 5) Deck, desk 6) He was the coach of a professional ball team. The team’s owner fired him because he was “sick and tired” of the team’s dismal performance. 7) a. ill; b. hill 8) the goat 9) a. Editor in Chief; b. Tea for two 10) a. 600 x 200 / 400 - 300 + 200 = 200; b. 200 / 300 x 600 - 400 + 200 = 200 11) Vivian was on the patio of her first class cabin on a cruise ship. She fell asleep just before the ship crossed the equator on a trip from Hawaii to New Zealand. The equator is the dividing line between the opposite seasons. She fell asleep north of the equator while in the middle of summer and awoke two hours later south of th equator in the middle of winter. 12) Tricky Problems

The Free Critical Thinking Quizzes are promotional quizzes, not be confused with our time tested and academically sound Cornell Critical Thinking Tests .

• Job Practice Tests Prep Experts
• All The Tests
• Free Cubiks Logiks Intermediate Course
• Free Numerical Reasoning Course
• Free Verbal Reasoning Course
• Free Inductive Reasoning Course
• Free Diagrammatic Reasoning Course
• Error Checking Course
• Birkman Assessment Tests
• Breke Assessment
• Caliper Assessment
• CAPP Assessment Tests
• CEB SHL Tests
• Cubiks Tests
• Cut-E Assessment
• Hogan Personality Inventory Test
• IBM Kenexa Tests
• Kenexa Prove It Test
• Pearson Assessment
• Pearson TalentLens Tests
• PeopleAnswers Assessment Tests
• Prevue Assessment
• Saville Swift Analysis Aptitude
• Siena Reasoning Test
• Talent Q Tests
• Wonderlic Tests
• Numerical Reasoning Test
• Inductive Reasoning
• Error Checking
• Analytical Reasoning Test
• Number Sequence Test
• Diagrammatic Reasoning Test
• Electronic Data Processing Test
• Raven Progressive Matrices
• Venn Diagram Test
• Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test
• The California Critical Thinking Skills Test
• Wiesen Test of Mechanical Aptitude
• Bennet Test of Mechanical Comprehension
• Ramsay Mechanical Aptitude Test
• Spatial Reasoning Test
• Situational Judgement Test
• Logical Reasoning
• Group Exercises
• Role Play Exercises
• In-Tray Exercises
• Microsoft Excel Test
• Microsoft Word Test
• Firefighter Exam
• 911 Dispatcher Test
• Federal Civil Service Exams
• Federal Air Marshal Exam
• Fire Department In-Basket Exercise
• USA Border Patrol Entrance Exam
• Transportation Security Administration Test
• Probation Officer Exam
• NSA Online Test
• NCJOSI Tests
• Walmart Assessment Test
• Deloitte Assessment Test
• Exxon Mobil Assessment Test
• 473 Postal Services Aptitude Exam
• Administrative Assistant Assessment Test
• Air Traffic Skill Assessment Test
• Call Center Assessment Test
• Clerical Aptitude Tests
• Job & Tests Forum
• Ask A Question

Aptitude Tests

Critical thinking.

The origin of the debates on the relevance of critical thinking can be traced back to the times of the Greek philosopher – Socrates. What is critical thinking and what makes it important in today’s age and time? At a time when employers give so much prominence to critical thinking skills how can one improve one’s existing skills? Can critical thinking practice exercises help you with it? Let’s find answers to all these questions in this article.

What is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking can be defined as a way of thinking that deploys a clear, logical and rational evaluation of things, events, or actions to reach a justified conclusion. It should not be confused with just the accumulation of information and knowledge. It requires an intellectual capacity to discern information skillfully. A person with critical thinking becomes efficient in systematic problem solving, establishing the logic behind ideas, and evaluating cases.

Why is Critical Thinking so important?

Critical thinking holds great significance in all fields of life. Its relevance cannot be contained to a limited number of domains. Be it research, law, education, management, or finance, the worth of critical thinking cannot be undermined less than an asset. Due to its reason oriented approach, critical thinking offers a platform to enhance one’s ability to express. This quality comes handy in all professions that call for good presentation skills.

What else?  Critical thinking also helps to inculcate problem solving skills that today hold a great significance in all professions. It is one phenomenon that holds equal importance in both the fields of science and art. It is true that critical thinking is central to the world science, but that does not make it any less relevant in the world of art and creativity. Creative ideas go through a processing cycle that requires analytical skills to filter and deduce the best of ideas.

Why employers value Critical Thinking skills?

Today employers seek critical thinking as one of the most required qualities in candidates as it builds up skills for independent decision making. A critical thinking test assesses analytical skills within a given spectrum of ideas. This skills set is a crucial component of general aptitude that measures the ability to think with reason and logic. It enables individuals to evaluate situations, analyze trends, and devise strategies for the best possible solutions.

Jobs that use Critical Thinking exercises for evaluation

The legal sector is one of the industries that make an intensive use of critical thinking tests. Jobs that require managerial skills also use these tests to evaluate the decision making aptitude of the candidates. Managers are team leaders and their problem solving and decision making skills are crucial to lead others by example. Other than these, a few more job portfolios that use critical thinking tests include the posts of; business analysts, software engineers, human resource specialists, operation managers, marketing associates, sales representatives, treasurers, chief executives, etc. Critical thinking tests can be challenging for job seekers and it requires a good amount of practice to perform up to the mark.

Critical thinking is a valuable skill and a desirable quotient that employers look up in the job candidates. Candidates need to demonstrate their inner critical thinker by assessing a given set of information and draw conclusions from it. Thereby, highlighting their problem solving and decision making skills. Many times employers put up hypothetical situations during interviews to evaluate the critical thinking skills of candidates. At this stage the candidate’s analytical aptitude holds greater importance than the answer to the question itself. Each job portfolio calls for a different set of critical thinking skills, and the candidate should be aware of the skills listed for his/her job portfolio for test preparation.

Critical thinking contributes to a great extent in the sharpening of various skills that are held high by employers in almost every job field. Major skills include the ability to evaluate, conceptualize, interpret, observe, question, reason, communicate, and synthesize information with reasonable conclusions. Let’s take a deeper look at the top five critical thinking tests –

Top five Critical Thinking skills:

• Analytical Thinking– Critical thinking calls for sharp analytical skills on the part of the candidates to evaluate any set of information. Analytical skills involve logic and reason to understand the dynamics of any problem. Also, they objectively study its pros and cons, and consequently draw reasonable solutions for it. Constituting candidates with sharp analytical skills is an asset for the employers of any job field, making it one of the most sought after qualities for their selection criteria.
• Problem Solving – Problem solving is another significant tool that tops the selection agenda of the employers. Critical thinking not only makes analytical thinking possible, but it also enables to implement all the sorted information into finding solutions for problems. Problem solving skill is an integral constituent of employees in all successful businesses.
• Decision Making – The evaluation of all ideas and problems by critical thinking is driven by reason oriented arguments. Hence, value judgments result in justified decision making.
• Communication Skills – There is no denying to the fact that in all areas of employment, communication is must. Sharing of ideas at work calls for engaging in long and serious discussions with co workers and seniors. Even in the most tensed of scenarios, a candidate can stand apart in performance by sharing valuable ideas in a coherent manner. Communication flows organically when the mind is ripe with organized and substantial information. On the whole it can be said that critical thinking enables good communication by offering clarity of thought.
• Creativity – Critical thinking requires a creative lens to identify patterns from collected information and conceptualize them into ideas. Creative instincts help to foresee and imagine the consequences of the course of action chosen. Creative critical thinking skills also contribute in the evolution of innovative ideas that carry implementation value.

Tips for improving your Critical Thinking skills

It is a fact that none of us uses critical thinking all the time to guide our actions. Still you can improve your existing critical thinking skills by paying attention to the following tips –

• Use an objective approach to reflect upon a topic or idea.
• Take into consideration all the sides of an argument regarding the topic.
• Identify strong and weak points in the argument.
• Find a reasonable argument to justify your own opinion.
• Examine your prejudices and assumptions.
• Identify your aim.
• Revaluate the implication of your potential decision.

Example scenario of a Critical Thinking exercise

When appearing for a critical thinking test, you will be presented with a paragraph of information including data that is both numerical and textual. This set of information will be accompanied by a statement that will ask you to verify the degree of truth in the paragraph with the help of your analytical skills. Usually, such tests include five sections including assumptions, analysis, deduction, inference, and interpretation. Let’s make a more detailed study of these five sections –

• Assumptions –  The candidate is expected to analyze the text with a perspective to look out for any potential assumptions.
• Analysis – The candidate will be presented with a scenario such as whether the state should provide for the cost of medical expenses of the poor. Such questions will be followed by varied arguments in support of and against the given situation. The candidate will use his/her analytical skills to distinguish between the weak and strong sides of the argument.
• Deduction – In this section, the candidate is expected to deduce a conclusion out of a set of deductions made from the given information.
• Inference – This section calls for the candidate to draw upon the set of possible inferences to find out whether they are absolutely true or false, possibly true of false, or inconclusive.
• Interpertation – The last section of the critical thinking test questions the candidate to interpret information from a set of possible conclusions.

More information

While preparing for critical thinking tests, you need to acquire new information as you will be tested on the basis of your existing reservoir of knowledge. All you can do is, sharpen your critical thinking faculties by critical thinking test preparation to draw out the most accurate solutions. You can find out how much the critical thinking test actually counts for your job portfolio by examining when it features during the recruitment procedure. If the critical thinking test features at the beginning of the procedure, it mostly accounts to be a priority skill for the employers. The increasing relevance of these tests taken up by organizations can be attributed to the assurance they bring for the highly skilled performance of the selected candidates.

Should I practice my critical thinking skills?

Passing a critical thinking test, whether at the screening level, interview level, or during an assessment, optimizes the chances of being hired by the particular organization. Hence, it becomes extremely imperative to work for improving critical thinking skills. Remember, you are tested in comparison to other candidates. Overachieving their scores will give you a much better chance in getting the job.

Critical thinking practice

This Prep Package is a proven solution for Watson Glaser preparation and general critical thinking tests. Start training or kick off with a free critical thinking test or Watson Glaser test first. Ace your critical thinking assessment!

$19.99 ($29.99)

• One-time payment
• 90 days access
• Money-back guarantee
• See how it works

Critical Thinking Prep Package features

• 13 tests, 2 categories, 440 questions
• Average time per test: 31 minutes
• Questions written by real test designers
• Professionally-written worked solutions for every question
• PDF booklets for offline viewing
• Online timed test simulator for realistic practice
• Suitable for many asssessment agencies

Does this package fit my critical thinking assessment?

Our critical thinking training was developed by the same psychologists who design tests for the likes of SHL , Kenexa , Talent Q , and Saville Assessment . So our test platform and example questions will give you a good feel for the critical thinking tests employers use. Questions are on average of graduate level. Some will be easier, some harder, on average they are just what you need. Performing your best in your Critical Thinking test is all about practice, and knowing what to expect!

Suitable for these assessment agencies and/or test publishers

There are a number of different critical reasoning tests that are being used worldwide. The most well-known critical reasoning test is the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal . Others include:

• SHL Critical Reasoning Test Battery
• Cappfinity Critical Reasoning Test
• Test Partnership Concepts Critical Thinking Test

Choose one or All Prep Packages

The Critical Thinking Practice Package is available for purchase as a single package, or as part of 'All Prep Packages'. For $47,99 you get ten packages that make up a highly complete assessment practice solution.

All Prep Packages 90 days access $ 47.99

• PDF download booklets
• 131 tests, 10 categories, 3100+ questions & answers
• Numerical Reasoning Prep Package
• Verbal Reasoning Prep Package
• Logical Reasoning Prep Package
• Diagrammatic Reasoning Prep Package
• Spatial Reasoning Prep Package
• Inductive Reasoning Prep Package
• Deductive Reasoning Prep Package
• Mechanical Reasoning Prep Package
• Critical Thinking Prep Package
• Error Checking Prep Package

Critical Thinking Prep Package 90 days access $ 19.99

• 13 tests, 2 categories, 440 questions & answers

Example questions and category list

The Critical Thinking Prep Package contains 13 tests accross 2 categories, totalling 440 questions. The categories are:

• Critical Thinking (9 tests)
• Critical Thinking Syllogisms (4 tests)

Below are example questions, one for each category.

Critical Thinking

Critical Thinking Syllogisms

General notes and guidelines

• Calculators are permitted for this test, and it is recommended you have some rough paper to work on.
• You will have to work quickly and accurately to perform well in this test.
• If you don't know the answer to a question, leave it and come back to it if you have time.
• Each question will have four possible answers, and you must select the most correct option.
• You may click Back and Next during the test to review or skip questions.
• You can submit your test at any time. If the time limit is up before you click submit the test will automatically be submitted with the answers you have selected. It is recommended to keep working until the time limit is up.
• Try to find a time and place where you will not be interrupted during the test.

Below is an example of each of the categories.

Sample question

A sample question from the Critical Thinking Test.

A sample question from the Critical Thinking Syllogism Test.

Testimonials and reviews

For a management position I recently had a tough assessment. Thanks to the Assessment training I was able to practice a few days in advance. The answers to the tests allowed me to see what I did wrong and what I did right. Thanks to the practice I went to the assessment with more confidence. I got the job! - Vidar   (August 2020)

I advise anyone who feels uncertain about an upcoming assessment to purchase the 'All Prep Packages' training of 123test.com. - Susan   (September 2020)

About 123test

123test® is a privately owned and independent company. For close to twenty years, we have been creating and publishing tests on the internet. Our tests are designed to help you find serious answers to your questions about IQ, personality, or career assessment. Tests published on 123test.com are not "marketing tools" used to sell you various products and services, or to obtain personal information, email addresses or résumés from you.

Let someone else know about this article

If you think reading this article would benefit someone you know, you can easily share it through the medium of your choice.

Share article:

16 Best Free Online Critical Thinking Courses

Written by Argumentful

Critical thinking is one of the most fundamental skills you could focus on. In fact, these skills are so important that many educational institutions have listed them among their central goals. Critical thinking helps you sort the true from the false.

The bad news is that not many people own these skills. Einstein famously said:

“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.”

The good news though is that you can improve your thinking and you can do it without breaking the bank.

Below are listed 16 of the best free online critical thinking courses with details regarding their contents.

Go on, choose your preferred course and take action today! (You can thank me later😉!)

P.S. Apart from the general critical thinking courses, I’ve included 5 specific ones which focus on today’s burning issues- fake news and climate change , as well as correctly interpreting randomized clinical trials and screening trials. See numbers 12 to 16 below.

Jump to Section

Critical reasoning for beginners, critical thinking classes at fayetteville state university, logical and critical thinking, critical thinking: fundamentals of good reasoning, philosophy and critical thinking, critical thinking & problem solving, introduction to critical thinking and logic, teaching critical thinking through art with the national gallery of art.

• Critical thinking: Reasoned Decision Making

The Science of Everyday Thinking

Critical thinking at university: an introduction, making sense of news, sorting truth from fiction: civic online reasoning, making sense of climate science denial, thinking critically: interpreting randomized clinical trials, thinking critically series: interpreting screening trials.

Offered by : University of Oxford

Description :

4 hours, 6 modules

1: The Nature of Arguments

How to recognise arguments and what the nature of an argument is

2: Different Types of Arguments

Different types of arguments, in particular deductive and inductive arguments

3: Setting Out Arguments Logic Book Style

How to identify and analyse arguments, and how to set arguments out logic book-style to make them easier to evaluate

4: What is a  Good Argument? Validity and Truth

How to evaluate arguments and how to tell whether an argument is good or bad, focusing specifically on inductive arguments

5: Evaluating Arguments Part One

Evaluation of arguments – this time deductive arguments – focusing in particular on the notion of validity

6: Evaluating Arguments Part Two

Fallacies: bad arguments that can easily be mistaken for good arguments

Also available on YouTube and iTunes

Offered by : Fayetteville State University

24 videos, 24 hours

Lectures from Spring 2011 Critical Thinking classes at Fayetteville State University held by Gregory B. Sadler. The textbook used was Moore And Parker’s Critical Thinking 9th edition .

• Issues, claims, arguments
• Arguments and non-arguments
• Value Judgments
• Complex arguments, unstated premises
• Deductive and inductive arguments with implicit premises
• Deductive and inductive arguments
• Information sources
• Experts and appeal to authority
• Critical thinking and advertising
• Rhetorical devices

Offered by : University Of Auckland

8 Weeks of study, 4 hours weekly

• Identify common flaws in belief construction
• Recognise and reconstruct arguments
• Evaluate arguments as being good or bad
• Analyse arguments using basic logical tools
• Apply basic logical strategies in areas such as science, moral theories and law

Offered by : IsraelX

9 weeks, 4-6 hours per week

You can create a free account on edx.org and have access to the course for 2 months. After 2 months, you can pay £37 to get unlimited access to the course.

The objective of the course is to improve the student’s ability in the basic skills of critical thinking:

• how to recognize arguments,
• how to interpret them,
• how to evaluate them,
• how to construct them.

Lesson 1. What’s “Critical Thinking?” Lesson 2. What are Arguments Made Of? Lesson 3. From Premises to Conclusions Lesson 4. Recognizing Arguments: Introduction Lesson 5. Argument vs. The Text Containing It Lesson 6. Recognizing Conclusions Lesson 7. Arguments vs. Explanations Lesson 8. Argument Diagrams: Introduction Lesson 9. More about Argument Diagrams Lesson 10. Argument Diagrams: Examples Lesson 11. Hedges Lesson 12. Disclaimers Lesson 13. Examples Lesson 14. Rhetorical Language Lesson 15. Referential Attribution Lesson 16. Principles of Interpretation Lesson 17. Implicit Premises Lesson 18. What’s a Good Argument? Lesson 19. More Virtues of Arguments Lesson 20. Argument Ad Hominem Lesson 21. Argument Ad Verecundiam Lesson 22. Argument Ad Populum Lesson 23. Argument Ad Ignorantiam Lesson 24. Argument Ad Baculum and Ad Misericordiam Lesson 25. Venn Diagrams Lesson 26. Beyond Venn Lesson 27. Modus Ponens Lesson 28. Modus Tollens Lesson 29. Conditionals Lesson 30. Reductio Ad Absurdum Lesson 31. Process of Elimination Lesson 32. Separation of Cases Lesson 33. Truth Trees: An Example Lesson 34. How to Grow Truth Trees Lesson 35. Truth Trees: Another Example Lesson 36. Reflexive Relations Lesson 37. Symmetric Relations Lesson 38. Transitive Relations Lesson 39. Inductive Generalization Lesson 40. What’s a Good Sample? Lesson 41. The New Riddle of Induction Lesson 42. From Induction to Causation Lesson 43. Evaluating Causal Generalizations Lesson 44. Argument from Analogy: Basics Lesson 45. Argument from Analogy: Examples Lesson 46. Who Needs Analogues? Lesson 47. Inference to the Best Explanation Lesson 48. Experimentation Lesson 49. Building an Argument Lesson 50. Writing Up an Argument

Offered by : The University of Queensland

6 weeks, 1-4 hours per week

• How to think with clarity and rigour
• How to identify, analyse and construct cogent arguments
• How to think of solutions to the central problems of philosophy
• How to engage in philosophical conversations with others about topics that matter

Offered by : Rochester Institute of Technology

3 weeks, 4-6 hours per week

• How to perform strategic analysis and assessment
• How to perceive and assess a critical need and design a tailored solution
• How to identify key stakeholders and ensure their needs are met
• How to employ adaptive problem-solving
• How to work through obstacles collaboratively
• How to analyse failure to improve future performance

Offered by : Saylor.org Academy

This course will introduce you to critical thinking, informal logic, and a small amount of formal logic. Its purpose is to provide you with the basic tools of analytical reasoning, which will give you a distinctive edge in a wide variety of careers and courses of study. While many university courses focus on the presentation of content knowledge, the emphasis here is on learning how to think effectively. Although the techniques and concepts covered here are classified as philosophical, they are essential to the practice of nearly every major discipline, from the physical sciences and medicine to politics, law, and the humanities.

• Unit 1: Introduction and Meaning Analysis
• Unit 2: Argument Analysis
• Unit 3: Basic Sentential Logic
• Unit 4: Venn Diagrams
• Unit 5: Fallacies
• Unit 6: Scientific Reasoning
• Unit 7: Strategic Reasoning and Creativity

Offered by : Smithsonian Institution

16 weeks, 3-4 hours per week

• How to use Artful Thinking Routines to strengthen thinking.
• How to facilitate meaningful conversations in your classroom using art for artful learning and artful teaching.
• How to help learners of all levels develop more discerning descriptions, evidence-based reasoning, and meaningful questioning habits.
• Key strategies for using content information to push original thinking deeper.
• Exciting, immersive activities for any type of classroom.
• How to use online teaching resources from the National Gallery of Art, including downloadable Artful Thinking lesson plans
• Unit 0: Welcome (2 hours)
• Unit 1: Diving into Thinking Routines (3-4 hours)
• Unit 2: Observing and Describing (3-4 hours)
• Unit 3: Reasoning with Evidence (3-4 hours)
• Unit 4: Questioning and Investigating (3-4 hours)

Critical thinking: reasoned decision making

Offered by : Tecnológico de Monterrey

4 weeks, 5-8 hours per week

• Identify the theories that support critical thinking
• Employ a methodology for the application of critical thinking
• Relate the elements that make up the stages of critical thinking
• Analyse the standards of critical thinking practice
• Assess the responsibility of perpetuating the intellectual values of the resolution analysis
• Distinguish the vices of thought in decision making
• Apply critical thinking to groups

1. Thinking according to our times

1.1 Why critical thinking?

1.2 The exciting world of thinking and criticism

2. Evaluating our modes of thought

2.1 Intellectual values of a good thinker

2.2 Evaluating our critical thinking skills. Avoiding vices and biased thinking

3. Elements and standards of critical thinking

3.1 Elements of a critical thinking process

3.2 Standards to apply to our thinking modes

4. Articulating our decisions making process

4.1 The logic of our decisions and the behaviour derived from them

4.2 How to improve our critical thinking skills and become a fair-minded thinker

12 weeks, 2-3 hours per week

The course explores the psychology of our everyday thinking: why people believe weird things, how we form and change our opinions, why our expectations skew our judgments, and how we can make better decisions. We’ll discuss and debate topics such as placebos, the paranormal, medicine, miracles, and more.

You will use the scientific method to evaluate claims, make sense of evidence, and understand why we so often make irrational choices. You will begin to rely on slow, effortful, deliberative, analytic, and logical thinking rather than fast, automatic, instinctive, emotional, and stereotypical thinking.

• tools for how to think independently, how to be skeptical, and how to value data over personal experience.
• examining the mental shortcuts that people use and misuse, and apply this knowledge to help make better decisions, and improve critical thinking.

Offered by : University of Leeds

2 weeks, 4 hours weekly

• What is critical thinking?
• A model for critical thinking
• Why is critical thinking important at university?
• Challenges to thinking critically at university
• How can you improve your critical thinking?
• How will critical thinking help you at university?

Offered by : University of Hong Kong

4 weeks, 2-3 hours per week

This course will help you identify reliable information in news reports and become better informed about the world we live in. A discussion on journalism from the viewpoint of the news audience.

• What makes news? The blurred lines between news, promotion and entertainment.
• Why does news matter? Social sharing and the dynamics of the news cycles.
• Who provides information? How to evaluate sources in news reports.
• Where is the evidence? The process of verification.
• When should we act? Recognizing our own biases.
• How do we know what we know? Becoming an active news audience.

You’ll learn to:

• Distinguish news from opinion; media bias from audience bias; assertion from verification
• Apply critical thinking skills to examine the validity of information
• Contextualize the knowledge gained from news report
• Respond quickly to daily news events and make an informed decision

Offered by : Massachusetts Institute of Technology

9 weeks, 2-4 hours per week

Course aimed at fighting fake news and misinformation

Educators—from teachers to librarians—will learn about:

• New knowledge that can be applied in your lessons and resources for your own students.
• How to shift from ineffective information literacy practices towards the kinds of strategies employed by professional fact-checkers.

Unit 1: Search Like a Fact Checker

Unit 2: The Two Big Fact Checker Moves: Lateral Reading & Click Restraint

Unit 3: Evaluating Different Types of Evidence

Unit 4: Adapting Civic Online Reasoning

7 weeks, 2-4 hours per week

WEEK 1: Understanding The Climate Controversy During the first week of the course, we introduce the course content, interact with each other and complete an introductory survey. The week continues with an exploration of political consensus, the drivers and psychology of climate science denial and an overview of the controversy surrounding this topic.

WEEK 2: Global Warming Is Happening In week two, we will look at the indicators of global warming and myths related to temperature and glaciers.

WEEK 3: We Are Causing Global Warming Week three focuses on the ways in which humans cause climate change and the myths associated with the greenhouse effect and the rise in carbon dioxide.

WEEK 4: The Past Tells Us About The Future This week looks at the history of climate change in order to model future climate change. We also address myths related to models.

WEEK 5: We Are Feeling The Impacts Of Climate Change Week five covers climate feedbacks and the impacts of climate change on the environment, society and the weather.

WEEK 6 and 7: Responding to Denial The final weeks of the course look more closely at the psychology of science denial and debunking techniques. We also complete a peer assessment that asks students to practice debunking strategies on real myths that can be found in today’s media.

Approach: mini-lectures, video interviews, quizzes, activities, a peer assessed writing assignment, and readings.

Offered by : Stanford University

1 week, 2-3 hours

This course seeks to fulfil the clinical community’s need to improve skills in the critical evaluation of clinical research papers. Competency in critical appraisal skills can have a significant impact by improving clinical practice, quality of research projects, and peer-review of manuscripts and grants. The course will utilize efficient and engaging videos with relevant clinical examples to cover essential research methodology principles.

• Analyse the concepts of randomization and blinding in reducing bias.
• Develop strategies to critically appraise randomized clinical trials and determine if study results are valid.
• Analyse the key design features of screening studies.
• Develop strategies to critically appraise screening studies and determine if study results are valid.

You May Also Like…

The Importance of Critical Thinking when Using ChatGPT (and Other Large Language Models)

Artificial intelligence has made tremendous strides in recent years, allowing for the creation of conversational AI...

How to Critically Evaluate News and Media Sources

I think we all agree that access to information has never been easier. With the click of a button, we can access an...

Critical Thinking in the Workplace

Imagine that you're in a job interview and the interviewer asks you to describe a time when you had to solve a complex...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

85 Fun Critical Thinking Questions for Kids & Teens

Have you ever thought about using fun questions to practice critical thinking?

Students may need a little guidance to think their way through questions that lack straightforward answers.

But it is that process that is important!

How the Right Questions Encourage Critical Thinking

Every parent knows how natural it is for children to ask questions. 

It should be encouraged. After all, asking questions helps with critical thinking.

As they grow older, however, training them to answer questions can be equally beneficial.

Posing questions that encourage kids to analyze, compare, and evaluate information can help them develop their ability to think critically about tough topics in the future. 

Of course, critical thinking questions for kids need to be age-appropriate—even better if you can mix a little fun into it!

That’s what I hope to help you with today. I’ve organized the questions below into three different ages groups:

• Upper elementary
• Middle school
• High school 

Get a Question-Based Critical Thinking Exercise—Free!

Introduce critical thinking gently & easily with thought-provoking exercises.

Upper Elementary

Students in upper elementary grades can be reluctant to put themselves out there, especially with answers that seem weird. 

In some cases, such hesitancy is actually fear of differing from their peers (and a barrier to critical thinking ). 

But that’s exactly why it’s important to practice answering ambiguous questions. 

We want our children to stand firm for their beliefs—not cave to peer pressure. 

Additionally, students may feel uneasy about answering serious questions, uncertain of tackling “big” problems. 

However, with careful use of creative questions for kids, it’s possible to engage even the most reluctant children in this age group. 

The idea is to simply get them interested in the conversation and questions asked.

If you have an especially reserved student, try starting with the funny critical thinking questions. 

Humor is a natural icebreaker that can make critical thinking questions more lighthearted and enjoyable. 

Of course, most younger kids just like to be silly, so playing upon that can keep them active and engaged.

With that said, here are some great questions to get you started:

1. Someone gives you a penguin. You can’t sell it or give it away. What do you do with it?

2. What would it be like if people could fly?

3. If animals could talk, what question would you ask? 

4. If you were ice cream, what kind would you be and why?

5. Do you want to travel back in time? If yes, how far back would you go? If no, why not?

6. What could you invent that would help your family? 

7. If you could stay up all night, what would you do?

8. What does the man on the moon do during the day?

9. What makes something weird or normal? 

10. Can you describe the tastes “salty” and “sweet” without using those words?

11. What does it feel like to ride a rollercoaster?

12. What makes a joke funny?

13. What two items would you take if you knew you would be stranded on an island and why?

14. Do you have a favorite way of laughing?

15. What noise makes you cringe and cover your ears? Why?

16. If you could be the parent for the day, what would you do?

17. If you could jump into your favorite movie and change the outcome, which one would you pick and why?

18. If you could be invisible for a day, what would you do?

19. What makes a day “perfect”?

20. If you owned a store, what kind of products would you sell?

21. If your parents were your age, would you be friends with them?

22. Would you still like your favorite food if it tasted the same as always, but now had an awful smell?

23. What would you do if you forgot to put your shoes on before leaving home?

24. Who would you be if you were a cartoon character?

25. How many hot dogs do you think you could eat in one sitting?

26. If you could breathe under water, what would you explore?

27. At what age do you think you stop being a kid?

28. If you had springs in your legs, what would you be able to do?

29. Can you describe the color blue to someone if they’re blind?

Middle School

At this point, students start to acquire more complex skills and are able to form their own conclusions based on the information they’re given. 

However, we can’t expect deep philosophical debates with 12 and 13 year olds. 

That said, as parent-teachers, we can certainly begin using more challenging questions to help them examine and rationalize their thought processes. 

Browse the fun critical thinking questions below for students in this age range. 

You might be surprised to see how receptive middle school kids can be to such thought-provoking (yet still fun) questions .

30. What would happen if it really did rain cats and dogs?

31. What does it mean to be lucky?

32. If you woke up in the middle of a dream, where would you be?

33. Is it ever okay to lie? Why or why not?

34. If you were solely responsible for creating laws, what one law would you make?

35. What makes a person a good friend?

36. What do you think is the most important skill you can take into adulthood?

37. If you had to give up lunch or dinner, which would you choose? Why?

38. How much money would you need to be considered rich?

39. If you knew you wouldn’t get caught, would you cheat on a test?

40. If you could live anywhere in the world, where would that be?

41. What is your greatest strength? How is that an asset?

42. If you had an opportunity to visit the International Space Station, would you do it?

43. Is it better to keep the peace or speak your mind?

44. Imagine yourself as your favorite animal. How would you spend your day?

45. Would you be friends with someone who didn’t have the same values as you?

46. How much screen time do you think is too much?

47. Can you describe your favorite color without naming it?

48. If you suddenly became blind, would you see things differently?

49. Would you ever go skydiving?

50. Describe the time you were the happiest in your life. Why did this make you happy?

51. If you had a million dollars, what would you do?

52. If you had to move to a new city, would you change how you present yourself to others?

53. What do you need to do in order to be famous?

54. If you could rewrite the ending of your favorite book or movie, what changes would you make?

55. How would you tackle a huge goal?

56. How would you sell ice to an eskimo in Alaska successfully?

57. What makes you unique?

High School

Critical thinking takes on an entirely different role once students reach high school. 

At this age, they have a greater sense of right and wrong (and what makes things so) as well as a better understanding of the world’s challenges.

Guiding teens to delve deeper and contemplate such things is an important part of developing their reasoning and critical thinking skills. 

Whether it’s fun questions about hypothetical superpowers or tough critical thinking questions about life, older teens typically have what it takes to think their way to a logical conclusion . 

Of course, use your discernment as you choose discussion topics, but here are some questions to help get you started:

58. How can you avoid [common problem] in the future?

59. Do you think it’s okay to take a life in order to save 5, 10, 20 or more people?

60. If you could go back and give your younger self advice, what would it be?

61. Is it better to give or receive a gift?

62. How important is it to be financially secure? Why?

63. If it was up to you, what one rule would you change in your family?

64. What would you do if a group of friends wanted to do something that you thought was a bad idea?

65. How do you know that something is a fact rather than an opinion?

66. What would it take to get you to change your mind?

67. What’s the most important thing in your life?

68. If money were of no concern, what job would you choose and why?

69. How do you know if you’re happy?

70. Do you think euthanasia is moral?

71. What is something you can do today that you weren’t able to do a year ago?

72. Is social media a good thing or not?

73. Is it right to keep animals in a zoo?

74. How does your attitude affect your abilities?

75. What would you do if you found out a friend was doing something dangerous?

76. If you could have any superpower, what would it be? Why?

77. What will life on Earth look like in 50 years?

78. Which is more important, ending world hunger or global warming?

79. Is it a good idea to lower the voting age to 16? Why or why not?

80. If the electrical power went out today, how would you cook if using wood wasn’t an option?

81. If you could magically transport yourself to any other place, where would that be and why?

82. When should teenagers be able to stay out all night?

83. Does the number zero actually exist?

84. What defines a generous person?

85. Does an influential person influence everyone?

Feel free to print out these fun critical thinking questions and incorporate them into your homeschool week!

will your children recognize truth?

About the author.

Jordan Mitchell

• Saville Assessment
• Thomas International
• PI Cognitive Assessment (PLI)
• AON Hewitt G.A.T.E.
• Korn Ferry Leadership Assessment
• Profiling for Success (PFS)
• Predictive Index (PI)
• NEO Personality Inventory
• Leadership Assessment
• Gallup’s CliftonStrengths
• Sales Personality Tests
• Personality Management Tests
• Saville Wave
• McQuaig Word Survey
• Bell Leadership Assessment
• Myers Briggs Personality Test
• DISC Personality Test
• Management SJT
• Supervisory SJT
• Fire Service SJT
• Call Center SJT
• Administrative SJT
• Customer Service SJT
• Numerical Reasoning Tests
• Logical Reasoning Tests
• Verbal Reasoning Tests
• Cognitive Ability Tests
• Technical Aptitude Tests
• Spatial Reasoning Tests
• Abstract Reasoning Test
• Deductive Reasoning Tests
• Inductive Reasoning Tests
• Mechanical Reasoning Tests
• Diagrammatic Reasoning Tests
• Concentration Tests
• Fault Finding Aptitude Tests
• Senior Management Tests
• Matrigma Test
• Critical Thinking Test
• Criteria’s CCAT Test
• Initial Sift Test
• British Council
• Probation Officer Exam
• Ireland’s Civil Service Tests
• EU’s EPSO Tests
• NHS Assessment
• GLP Assessment
• Public Health Speciality Training
• Prison Officer Selection Test
• Firefighters Tests
• Police Tests
• Cancer Research UK
• British Army Officer Selection Board
• Hiring Processes by Professions

Select Page

Critical Thinking Test: Online Preparation & Free Practice Questions – 2024

• Information
• Free Example Questions

What Is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking, also known as critical reasoning, is a form of decision making and reasoning using data and observations. Someone who is a strong critical thinker can find quality solutions efficiently and can evaluate issues objectively.

What Is a Critical Thinking Test?

Critical thinking tests provide companies valuable insight into the leadership, reasoning, and overall capabilities of candidates. Because strong critical thinking skills are highly sought after, the critical thinking test can be applicable to any field and discipline across multiple levels of expertise from recent graduate to executive. However, it is commonly administered to those applying for criminal justice and business-related occupations.

Job seekers with upcoming critical thinking tests will be evaluated on more than their ability to rationalize, critical thinking tests also measure the following subsets:

• Organizing & Planning
• Strategizing
• Decision Making
• Problem Solving

The format of the critical thinking uses hypothetical scenarios to assess candidates. The scenarios are typically relevant to the field you are interested in to assess your knowledge of the role. There will also be general questions concerning more basic issues or problems that commonly occur in a workplace environment.

The critical thinking test is multiple-choice with thirty minutes to complete the assessment. Candidates will receive a notification stating whether or not they passed within a week of completion.

How Is the Critical Thinking Test Scored?

The critical reasoning test is scored based on your raw score and your percentile in comparison with your norm group. It’s important to note that these will not be the same number.

A norm group is a collection of scores from individuals in your field at your level of experience. The percentile score is used to alert employers if you exceed, meet or miss the benchmark for the average expectations of candidates. You will be rated on a scale of one to one hundred with fifty consisting of the mean and median scores.

A raw score is simply the number of correct answers. The critical thinking test comprises your raw score based on the performance in the following areas:

• Recognizing Assumptions The candidate must be able to understand when a statement is made with no supporting evidence and how this can affect a decision. Further, candidates are asked to identify these discrepancies, whether they are stated explicitly or implicitly, and assess its relevance to the given scenario.
• Evaluating Arguments Candidates must evaluate arguments without considering inferences or being subjective. Beyond that, candidates must assess the supporting evidence, the structure of the argument and the degree of its influence. It is very important to dismiss emotions for this portion of the critical thinking test.
• Drawing Conclusions Drawing conclusions puts a large emphasis on reasoning. In this section, it’s important to assess all of the available evidence and data to form a plausible conclusion that accurately applies to all the given information. Employers also want to see candidates that will consider all possible solutions rather than making the evidence fit a desired narrative.

Employers will receive all of this information in a performance report construed by the assessment company. Employers will also be given insight into your overall potential, job knowledge, creativity and job performance per the report.

Where Will I Take a Critical Thinking Test?

Critical thinking tests are non-proctored online assessments that are typically sent via email after an initial screening. For some occupations, the company may ask that the candidate take the critical thinking test again on-site either before their final interview or during an assessment day. The most common test candidates are asked to take is the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) created by the popular assessment company, Pearson . This assessment company is on their third edition with new scoring and subsets described above. The WGCTA gained popularity because of its ability to assess a candidate’s potential alongside their aptitude. Another established assessment is the SHL Critical Reasoning Battery that contains sixty questions with a thirty-minute time limit. Both of the aforementioned critical thinking tests are multiple choice.

How to Prepare for the Critical Thinking Test?

The critical thinking test is difficult to study for because the test is designed to assess your bare knowledge and raw skills. In order to prepare successfully, it is important to focus on the areas of the test that you can equip yourself for. One aspect of the test that demands preparation is the time limit. Many candidates’ scores are negatively impacted because they skip or guess too many of the questions in an attempt to beat the clock. If you want to optimize your chances of achieving a good score, use online practice tests to acquaint yourself with the time constraint and the general theme of the questions. By utilizing the online practice tests, you can find the pace that works best for you. Another helpful way to prepare is running through sample questions. This way, you can warm-up your brain and gain an understanding of the expectations that both the test and the company have of you.

Free Sample Questions to Practice

• Look over her past quizzes to see what she missed.
• Set aside more time during the week to review the material for the quiz.
• Get to class on early Wednesday and briefly look over the chapters.
• Get a good night’s sleep.
• Parents should find an alternative way to get their kids to school next week.
• The premiums must be over-priced.
• Collective bargaining is no longer a feasible solution.
• Their employers are being unreasonable.
• People in Hawaii dislike living on an island.
• Colder climates induce more happiness than warmer climates.
• The high scores on the Alaska survey were produced by people who enjoy snow.
• People in Hawaii should move to Alaska.
• Jenny’s credit card was declined at the mall.
• Jenny’s bank keeps charging her $30 overdraft fees.
• Jenny’s check bounced when she attempted to purchase a new TV.
• Jenny spends more money than she makes.
• Lori has thirty cans of soda in a refrigerator in her garage and another fourteen sitting on the counter. Lori does not have anymore cans of soda. Therefore, Lori has 44 cans of soda.
• The accounting department loves math. My friend works in the accounting department. My friend loves math.
• Everyone southbound on the freeway yesterday was late to work. Jackie was southbound on the freeway. Jackie was late to work.
• Adrian lives in either Springfield, California, or Springfield, Illinois. If he lives in Illinois, then he is an American.

Aptitude Tests

• Aptitude Tests Guide
• Numerical Reasoning Test
• Verbal Reasoning Test
• Cognitive Ability Test
• Logical Reasoning Test
• Spatial Reasoning Test
• Technical Aptitude Test
• Inductive Reasoning Test
• Analytical Reasoning Test
• Deductive Reasoning Test
• Non-Verbal Reasoning Test
• Mechanical Reasoning Test
• Diagrammatic Reasoning Test
• Mathematical Reasoning Tests
• Finance Reasoning Aptitude Test
• Concentration Assessment Test
• Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test
• Fault Finding (Fault Diagnosis) Test
• Senior Management Aptitude Tests
• Error Checking Tests
• In-Basket Exercise

Free Riddles for Kids Printable

Engage your kids in critical thinking and problem-solving with these easy  riddles for kids printable ! This FREE 26-page PDF includes a printable list of riddles and 50 riddle cards that you can easily print, cut out, and fold to create an enjoyable activity for kids of all ages. These riddles are a great way to spark creative thinking and entertain children while enhancing their cognitive skills. Learn more about how you can make the most of these printable riddles and download your free copy today of these brain teasers!

Benefits of Using Riddles for Kids

Riddles are more than just a fun activity; they are an excellent tool for developing a range of skills in children. Here are some of the key benefits:

• Critical Thinking : Riddles challenge kids to think critically and solve problems in a creative way.
• Problem-Solving Skills : Working out the answers to riddles helps improve problem-solving abilities.
• Language Skills : Riddles introduce new vocabulary and help kids understand different meanings of words.
• Social Interaction : Sharing riddles can be a fun way to interact with others, promoting social skills.
• Engagement : Riddles are an engaging activity that can capture the attention of kids and keep them entertained.

Think Outside the Box

When to use the free riddles for kids printable.

These printable riddles are versatile and can be used in various settings. Here are some suggestions:

• Quick activity in the classroom
• Around the campfire
• Long car rides
• Conversation starters
• Independent work
• Brain teaser worksheets
• Social interaction games

How to Use the Riddles for Kids Printable

Using the riddles for kids printable is easy and straightforward. Follow these simple steps to get started:

• Download the PDF : Click the link to download the 18-page PDF that includes 50 riddle cards.
• Print the Pages : Use a color printer for the best results.
• Cut Out the Riddle Cards : Carefully cut along the lines to separate the riddle cards.
• Fold the Cards : Fold each card to hide the answer on the back.
• Enjoy the Riddles : Use the riddle cards in various activities and enjoy watching the kids solve them!

Examples of Riddles 

Here are a few examples of the fun and challenging riddles you will find in our printable:

• Answer: A mushroom.
• Answer: An echo.
• Answer: The letter ‘M’.
• Answer: A piano.
• Answer: A sponge.

Tips for Solving Riddles

Solving riddles can sometimes be tricky, but with a few tips, it can become a fun and rewarding activity:

• Read Carefully : Make sure to read the riddle carefully and understand every word.
• Think Outside the Box : Riddles often require creative thinking and a different perspective.
• Don’t Overthink : Sometimes the simplest answer is the correct one.
• Ask for Help : If you’re stuck, don’t hesitate to ask someone else for their thoughts.

Printable Riddles: A Fun Way to Learn

Our  printable riddles  are a great way to combine fun and learning. They can be used in various educational settings to promote critical thinking, language skills, and problem-solving abilities. Whether you are a teacher looking for a quick classroom activity or a parent seeking to entertain your kids during a long car ride, these riddles are the perfect choice.

Creating Your Own Riddles

Encouraging kids to create their own riddles can be a fantastic way to boost their creative thinking and language skills. Here are some tips for creating riddles:

• Start with the Answer : Think of an interesting answer and build the riddle around it. Do kids need ideas? Try animal riddles, hard riddles, funny riddles, orsimple math riddles.
• Use Wordplay : Incorporate puns or double meanings to make the riddle more challenging.
• Keep It Simple : Ensure the riddle is easy to understand and not overly complicated.
• Test It Out : Share the riddle with others to see if they can solve it. If they are tricky riddles, see if the kids can make them easier.

50 Fun Riddles for Kids

Here is a list of riddles that are also included with the printable if you prefer this format for the set of riddles. These are the best riddles for younger kids since they are not too difficult.

• Answer: A coat of paint.
• Answer: His breath.
• Answer: A teapot.
• Answer: A penny.
• Answer: A stamp.
• Answer: A needle.
• Answer: A towel.
• Answer: Silence.
• Answer: A joke.
• Answer: A glove.
• Answer: An envelope.
• Answer: Your age.
• Answer: A keyboard.
• Answer: Charcoal.
• Answer: The letter ‘W’.
• Answer: Incorrectly.
• Answer: A river.
• Answer: A shirt.
• Answer: A promise.
• Answer: A palm tree.
• Answer: A comb.
• Answer: An artichoke.
• Answer: A table.
• Answer: Your legs.
• Answer: A tree.
• Answer: A cold.
• Answer: A fence.
• Answer: Light.
• Answer: A clock.
• Answer: A map.
• Answer: A road.
• Answer: A rubber band.
• Answer: A garbage truck.
• Answer: A telephone.
• Answer: Your left elbow.
• Answer: A library.
• Answer: The future.
• Answer: Short.
• Answer: The letter ‘G’.
• Answer: A staircase.
• Answer: Your word.
• Answer: Rain.
• Answer: A tombstone.
• Answer: A bottle.

Enjoy these fun and engaging riddles with your kids! The next time the kids are bored, try these sets of riddles.

Fun Activity Ideas with Riddles

There are plenty of fun ways to use riddles in different activities. Here are some ideas to get you started:

• Riddle Scavenger Hunt : Hide riddle cards around the house or classroom and have kids find and solve them.
• Riddle of the Day : Introduce a new riddle each day as a fun daily challenge.
• Riddle Competition : Organize a friendly competition to see who can solve the most riddles.
• Riddle Story Time : Incorporate riddles into bedtime stories or reading time for an added element of fun.

Download Your Free Riddles for Kids Printable

Ready to get started? Download your free  riddles for kids printable  and enjoy hours of fun and learning with your kids. This 26-page PDF includes a list of riddles and 50 riddle cards that you can print, cut out, and fold to create engaging critical thinking questions for kids.

Riddles are a timeless and enjoyable way to challenge young minds and promote critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Our  riddles for kids printable  offers a convenient and fun resource that you can use in various settings, from classrooms to car rides. Download the PDF today and start enjoying the benefits of these engaging and educational riddles with your kids. Happy riddling!

Growing Play

• Skip to main content

Update your browser for the best possible experience

As of January 1st, 2020, Internet Explorer (versions 11 and below) is no longer supported by Evolve. To get the best possible experience using Evolve, we recommend that you use another web browser. For HESI iNet users click here .

Alison's New App is now available on iOS and Android! Download Now

Do you represent a business or organization that would like to train and upskill their employees?

If yes, check out Alison’s Free LMS here!

header.all_certificate_courses

Personal development, sales & marketing, engineering & construction, teaching & academics.

Become an Alison Affiliate in one click, and start earning money by sharing any page on the Alison website.

• Change Language

Problem Solving and Critical Thinking Skills

This free online course includes:.

• Hours of Learning
• CPD Accreditation
• Final Assessment

Rate This Course & Get Better Recommendations!

Thanks for your review, in this free course, you will learn how to.

This course, Problem Solving and Critical Thinking Skills, will provide you with an understanding of creative problem solving. You will learn the problem solving method. You will be able to explain information gathering and problem definition. You will also learn about preparing for brainstorming, generating solutions, analyzing solutions, and selecting a solution.

This course then explains critical thinking. You will learn about components of critical thinking, non-linear thinking, and logical thinking. You will also learn about critical thinkers. Students will learn about evaluating the information and the benefits of critical thinking. The module then talks about problem solving.

This course then wraps up with organizational skills. You will learn how to remove the clutter. Students will also learn how to prioritize their time and schedule with to do lists. Students will also learn about paper and paperless storage as well as how to organize their work area. The course concludes with tools to fight procrastination and avoiding disorganization. By taking this course you will learn problem solving. critical thinking, and organizational skills. So why wait? Start learning today.

All Alison courses are free to enrol study and complete. To successfully complete this course and become an Alison Graduate, you need to achieve 80% or higher in each course assessment. Once you have completed this course, you have the option to acquire an official Diploma, which is a great way to share your achievement with the world.

Your Alison is:

• Ideal for sharing with potential employers
• Great for your CV, professional social media profiles and job applications.
• An indication of your commitment to continuously learn, upskill & achieve high results.
• An incentive for you to continue empowering yourself through lifelong learning.

Alison offers 3 types of Diplomas for completed Diploma courses:

• Digital : a downloadable in PDF format immediately available to you when you complete your purchase.
• : a physical version of your officially branded and security-marked , posted to you with FREE shipping.
• Framed : a physical version of your officially branded and security marked in a stylish frame, posted to you with FREE shipping.

All s are available to purchase through the Alison Shop . For more information on purchasing Alison , please visit our FAQs . If you decide not to purchase your Alison , you can still demonstrate your achievement by sharing your Learner Record or Learner Achievement Verification, both of which are accessible from your Account Settings . For more details on our pricing, please visit our Pricing Page

Knowledge & Skills You Will Learn

Complete this cpd accredited course & get your certificate , certify your skills, stand out from the crowd, advance in your career.

Learner Reviews & Feedback For Problem Solving and Critical Thinking Skills

Want to create a customised learning path for your team.

Our dedicated Learning Advisors are here to help you curate a customised learning path tailored to your organisation's needs and goals.

Explore Careers Related To This Course

Not sure where to begin or even what you want to do.

Discover the career most suitable for you and get started in the field with a step-by-step plan.

About Your Alison Course Publisher

- alison stats, more free online courses by this publisher, learners who took this course also enrolled in, explore subjects related to this course.

Join our community of 40 million+ learners, upskill with CPD UK accredited courses, explore career development tools and psychometrics - all for free.

• Reset password form here

• Open access
• Published: 08 July 2024

Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the critical thinking disposition scale: methodological study

• Hossein Bakhtiari-Dovvombaygi 1 , 2 ,
• Kosar Pourhasan 1 ,
• Zahra Rahmaty 3 ,
• Akbar Zare-Kaseb 1 ,
• Abbas Abbaszadeh 2 ,
• Amirreza Rashtbarzadeh 1 &
• Fariba Borhani 2 , 4  

BMC Nursing volume  23 , Article number:  463 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

74 Accesses

Metrics details

Introduction

Assessing critical thinking disposition is crucial in nursing education to foster analytical skills essential for effective healthcare practice. This study aimed to evaluate the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale among Iranian nursing students.

A total of 390 nursing students (mean age = 21.74 (2.1) years; 64% female) participated in the study. Face and content validity were established through feedback from nursing students and expert specialists, respectively. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA was used to explore the number of factors and the items that were loading on them. The CFA was used to confirmed the fidnings of the EFA on the same sample. Convergent and discriminant validity were examined, along with reliability through internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

EFA revealed a two-factor structure, comprising “Critical Openness” and “Reflective Skepticism,” explaining 55% of the total variance. CFA confirmed the model’s fit (χ² = 117.37, df = 43, χ²/df = 2.73, p  < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.067; CFI = 0.95; TLI = 0.93, SRMR = 0.041). Convergent and discriminant validity were supported, with significant factor loadings ( p  < 0.001) ranging from 0.61 to 0.77. The CTDS exhibited strong internal consistency (α = 0.87) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96).

The validation of the CTDS in Persian language settings provides a reliable tool for assessing critical thinking disposition among Iranian nursing students. The two-factor structure aligns with previous research, reflecting students’ propensity towards critical openness and reflective skepticism. The study’s findings underscore the importance of nurturing critical thinking skills in nursing education.

Peer Review reports

Critical thinking can be seen as the ability to think logically, dynamically, comprehensively and practically when judging a situation to investigate and make appropriate decisions [ 1 , 2 ]. This ability helps to gain insight and examine an idea or concept from different perspectives [ 3 ]. Critical thinking has become an educational ideal, with most policy makers and educationists calling for the development of critical attitudes in students [ 4 ]. Critical thinking has been identified as one of the most important outcomes of higher education courses [ 5 ].

There is increasing evidence showing that critical thinking is considered an important part of preregistered nursing students and registered nurses when they are working in various clinical practice settings [ 6 , 7 ]. Critical thinking is one of the basic skills that prepares nursing students to effectively manage patient problems, make the best clinical decisions, provide safe and high-quality care, and better control critical situations. On the other hand, negative consequences such as depression, failure to solve patient problems, and incomplete clinical reasoning can be consequences of poor critical thinking [ 8 , 9 ].

Critical thinking is expected in nursing program graduates at the international level [ 10 , 11 ]. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and measure the levels of critical thinking of nursing students at different stages and education so that educators can adjust learning activities to ensure the desired results [ 2 , 12 , 13 ]. Educators are the ones who are responsible for and have the opportunity to shape this skill during the years of education and trayning new generations [ 14 ]. Despite the importance of critical thinking in the nursing profession, studies have reported a lack of critical thinking skills among undergraduate students in the field [ 15 , 16 ].

Critical thinking has two main components: critical thinking skills and critical thinking disposition (CTD). The skills component refers to the cognitive processes of thinking, while the disposition component refers to personal desire and internal motivation for critical thinking [ 9 ]. Several studies have highlighted the need for reliable assessment tools for critical thinking, specifically in nursing, rather than in a general context [ 17 , 18 , 19 ].

To our knowledge, and based on our literature review, the CTD is the only specific tool for assessing the tendency to think critically. However, this tool has not been used or validated in the Iranian educational context, population and language. Considering the lack of effective tools for evaluating CTD in undergraduate nursing programs in Iran, the purpose of this study was to translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of CTD among nursing students.

Study design

This was a cross-sectional study utilizing cross-cultural adaptation to translate and investigate the validity and reliability of the CTDS for use among Iranian nursing students [ 20 ]. The translated scale underwent examination for reliability and validity tests.

Study population and sampling

Convenience sampling was employed at the School of Nursing, Shahid Beheshti University in Tehran. This method involved selecting participants who were readily available and willing to take part in the study. Specifically, the study targeted all undergraduate nursing students, who were invited to participate in the research. Recruitment continued until the desired sample size was achieved. To maintain the integrity of the data, students who submitted incomplete questionnaires were excluded from the analysis. Undergradute studies in Iran normally involve 4 years of education in general nursing, as well as clinical rotations in all hospital units and public health sectors.

There are two general recommendations concerning the minimum sample size necessary for conducting factorial analysis. The first recommendation emphasizes the significance of the absolute number of cases (N), while the second recommendation highlights the importance of the subject-to-variable ratio (p). Guilford suggested that N should be no less than 200 [ 21 ]. Additionally, MacCallum et al. recommended that the subject-to-variable ratio should be at least 5 [ 22 ]. A total of 390 nursing students voluntarily participated in the study.

Measurements

The CTDS, developed by Sosu, is an instrument used to measure the dispositional dimension of critical thinking [ 23 ]. Self-report questionnaires were given to the students. The demographic questionnaire collected included participants’ age, gender, education, and grade point average (GPA). The Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS) was used to measure the dispositional aspect of critical thinking. This scale comprises 11 items, employing a five-point Likert-type response format (1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = neutral; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree). Total scores range from 11 to 55. The subscores include the first seven items reflecting a level of critical openness with a score ranging from 7 to 35 and the last four items indicating a level of reflective skepticism with a score ranging from 4 to 20. Higher CTDS scores indicate a greater degree of critical thinking [ 23 ].

Translation of the CTD scale

Following correspondence with the instroment developer, Dr. Sosu, and obtaining permission, the scale underwent translation using the standard Backward-Forward method. Initially, the scale was independently and simultaneously translated from English to Persian by two translators proficient in both Farsi and English. In the subsequent phase, these translations were juxtaposed and merged into a unified translation. This facilitated the comparison and identification of discrepancies, which were then rectified based on feedback from a panel of experts, including two psychometric experts and two nursing professors. In the third stage, the resulting Persian version was given to two translators fluent in Persian and English (distinct from those in the initial experts) to translate it back to English, thereby completing the translation of the scale from Persian to English. In the fourth stage, the two English translations were compared, and any disparities were resolved by the experts, culminating in a single translation. Subsequently, the prefinal version was evaluated for content and face validity.

Face validity

Face validity refers to the degree to which a measurement method seems to accurately measure the intended construct [ 24 ]. In a qualitative assessment of face validity, 10 nursing students were asked to evaluate factors such as the clarity of phrases and words, the coherence and relevance of items, the potential for ambiguity, and the necessity of removing or combining items. Additionally, two nursing professors and two psychometric specialists scrutinized the scale to determine whether it indeed appeared to measure its intended construct.

Content validity

Content validity examines the extent to which a collection of scale items aligns with the pertinent content domain of the construct it aims to assess [ 24 ]. The qualitative evaluation of the content validity involved a panel consisting of two nursing professors in the field of nursing education and two statisticians who were experts in psychometric topics. Their input on item placement, word selection, grammar adherence, and scoring accuracy of the scale and its instructions were solicited, with their feedback serving as the foundation for any required adjustments.

Construct validity

Exploratory factor analysis.

To explore the number of existing subscales and potential factors, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation. The scree plot and parallel analysis suggested the number of existing factors. The scree plot displays the eigenvalues of each factor extracted from the data in descending order. The number of factors was retained by examining the slope of the curve. A sharply decreasing slope indicates the optimal number of factors that capture the most variance in the data.

Confirmatory factor analysis

To confirm the findings of the EFA, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted using MPLUS to confirm the 2-factor structure identified with the items loaded on each factor in the EFA. Model fit indices, including Comparative Fit Index (CFI), the standardized residual root mean squared error (SRMR) of approximation and the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), with cutoff points of > 0.95, < 0.08 and < 0.06, respectively, were used [ 25 ]. Factor loadings were reported using standardized beta coefficients to evaluate the strength of the relationships between items and factors, and a p value of 0.05 was considered a significant factor loading.

Convergent and discriminant validity

The mean scores for Critical Openness and Reflective Skepticism were computed. Convergent and Discriminant Validity was checked for correlations between students’ GPA as an indicator of academic achievement and the scores of the subscales of the CTDS.

• Reliability

To assess reliability, internal consistency was tested using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient calculations for the total score and subscores. To assess the consistency of the test-retest approach over a two-week period, a group of 40 individuals from the target demographic underwent examination. Their scores from both sessions were analyzed to determine test-retest reliability, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated.

Ethical considerations

The current study underwent assessment and received approval from the Research Ethics Committee at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Ethical code: IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1403.013). Permissions were duly acquired from the pertinent authorities at the research sites as well as the developer of the original scale. Nursing students were provided with comprehensive information regarding the study’s objectives, their right to withdraw from participation, and the confidentiality of their data. Informed consent was obtained from all participating students. All procedures adhered strictly to the appropriate guidelines and regulations.

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics, including the mean, standard deviation, median, range, and frequency, were used to describe the population and their critical thinking scores. Analysis of demographic characteristics, EFA, and reliability tests were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 27). CFA was performed using MPLUS (Program Copyright © 1998–2017 Muthén & Muthén Version 8) software.

Characteristics of the participants

A total of 390 participants (mean age = 21.74 (2.1) years; 64% female) completed the questionnaire.

Face validity and content validity

Face validity was established through the feedback of 10 nursing students, while content validity was assessed by four expert specialists. No alterations were made to the items in terms of their simplicity and clarity during the evaluation of both face and content validity.

The scree plot and parallel analysis suggested a two-factor solution (Fig.  1 ), which accounted for 55% of the total variance in the scores (Table  1 ). Factor loadings revealed a clear factor structure, with items loading on two factors. The rotated factor loadings are presented in Table  2 . The items clustered together on two distinct factors, with no cross-loadings observed.

Scree Plot of the Persian version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale

The two factors were interpreted as follows: Factor 1, labeled “Critical Openness,” comprised items related to the level of critical openness; Factor 2, labeled “Reflective skepticism” included items reflecting the level of reflective skepticism. These factors align well with previously established dimensions.

CFA confirmed the model including the two factors with their respective indicators based on the EFA results. The CFA model demonstrated acceptable fit to the data: χ² (55) = 1500.38, p  < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.067; CFI = 0.95; TLI = 0.93, SRMR = 0.041. Although the chi-square test was significant, other fit indices indicated a reasonably good fit to the data.

The standardized factor loadings ranged from 0.61 to 0.77, Fig.  2 , all of which were statistically significant ( p  < 0.001) (Table  3 ). These loadings provided further support for the factor structure identified in the EFA.

Factor structure of the Persian version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale

Convergent and discriminant validity were examined by determining factor scores based on item allocation. The analysis revealed a sample mean of 28.65 (SD = 2.7) for the Critical Openness factor and a mean of 16.8 (SD = 1.8) for Reflective Skepticism. A weak yet statistically significant correlation was observed between students’ GPA and their level of critical openness ( r  = 0.15, p  = 0.003), indicating a slight association between academic performance and this aspect of cognitive disposition.

The reliability of the CTDS-P was assessed through rigorous statistical analysis. Internal consistency was robust, as indicated by a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.87 for the overall scale, demonstrating the coherence of the items within the measure. Subscale analysis revealed strong reliability, with values of 0.83 for critical openness and 0.80 for reflective skepticism, indicating the consistency of responses across different dimensions of the construct. Additionally, the scale exhibited excellent test-retest reliability, as evidenced by an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.96, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.93 to 0.98, suggesting high stability and consistency of the scores over time.

The CTDS has undergone translation and cross-validation in different populations across the USA [ 26 ], Norway [ 27 ], Brazil [ 28 ], Spain [ 29 ], Turkey [ 30 ], and Vietnam [ 31 ]. The reliability and validity of this scale have been demonstrated in studies conducted among high school students [ 29 ] and university students [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 ]. The CTDS was first introduced as a tool to measure critical thinking disposition in undergraduate and postgraduate students [ 4 ].

This study used comprehensive reliability and validity tests to validate the CTDS in the Persian language and in Iranian nursing student participation. This study revealed the existence of two factors, critical openness and reflective skepticism. These factors align well with previously established studies [ 4 , 27 , 30 , 31 ]. Conversely, Spanish, Brazilian, and US versions demonstrated that the one-factor model fit better for their population [ 26 , 28 , 29 ].

In the face validity and content validity tests, neither the simplicity nor the clarity of the items were altered. The validity of the content was done qualitatively. Similar to previous quantitatively measured studies, our study has also confirmed the validity of the content [ 28 , 31 ].

The internal consistency of the CTDS demonstrated the coherence of the items within the measure. Several studies have reported similar internal consistency values for the CTDS, with Cronbach’s alpha measuring 0.88 according to Nguyen et al. 2023. Sosu et al. 2013, Akin et al. 2015, Yockey 2016, Bravo et al. 2020, and Gerdts-Andresen et al. 2022 also reported values of 0.79, 0.78, 0.79, 0.77, and 0.76, respectively. It is widely recognized that a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.70 or higher is acceptable [ 32 ]. Consequently, the CTDS has exhibited strong internal consistency across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. In addition, the scale exhibited excellent test-retest reliability, thereby indicating a high level of stability and consistency in scores across time. Additionally, our study demonstrated an outstanding ICC [ 33 , 34 ].

There are several limitations to this study. Initially, the self-assessment survey may have been prone to social desirability bias, leading to potential overestimation of reported measures. To mitigate bias, this study utilized an anonymous survey. Moreover, the study used a cross-sectional design, which prevented the establishment of prospective predictive validity.

To conclude, our investigation establishes the CTDS as a reliable and valid tool for evaluating critical thinking disposition among Iranian nursing students. With its two-factor structure of “Critical Openness” and “Reflective Skepticism,” the scale offers valuable insights into cognitive disposition. Its robust psychometric properties underscore its potential for enhancing critical thinking skills in healthcare education and practice. Further research avenues may explore its nuanced applications in fostering analytical reasoning and problem-solving abilities.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the necessity to ensure participant confdentiality policies and laws of the country but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Susiani TS, Salimi M, Hidayah R, editors. Research based learning (RBL): How to improve critical thinking skills? SHS Web of Conferences; 2018: EDP Sciences.

Nes AAG, Riegel F, Martini JG, Zlamal J, Bresolin P, Mohallem AGC, et al. Brazilian undergraduate nursing students’ critical thinking need to be increased: a cross-sectional study. Revista brasileira de enfermagem. 2022;76:e20220315.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Wang Y, Nakamura T, Sanefuji W. The influence of parental rearing styles on university students’ critical thinking dispositions: the mediating role of self-esteem. Think Skills Creativity. 2020;37:100679.

Article   Google Scholar  

Sosu EM. The development and psychometric validation of a critical thinking Disposition Scale. Think Skills Creativity. 2013;9:107–19.

Hart C, Da Costa C, D’Souza D, Kimpton A, Ljbusic J. Exploring higher education students’ critical thinking skills through content analysis. Think Skills Creativity. 2021;41:100877.

Zhang C, Fan H, Xia J, Guo H, Jiang X, Yan Y. The effects of reflective training on the disposition of critical thinking for nursing students in China: a controlled trial. Asian Nurs Res. 2017;11(3):194–200.

Organization WH. Global standards for the initial education of professional nurses and midwives. World Health Organization; 2009.

Organization WH. State of the world’s nursing 2020: investing in education, jobs and leadership. 2020.

Dehghanzadeh S, Jafaraghaee F. Comparing the effects of traditional lecture and flipped classroom on nursing students’ critical thinking disposition: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;71:151–6.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Kermansaravi F, Navidian A, Kaykhaei A. Critical thinking dispositions among junior, senior and graduate nursing students in Iran. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2013;83:574–9.

Carvalho DPSRP, Vitor AF, Cogo ALP, Bittencourt GKGD, Santos VEP, Ferreira Júnior MA. Measurement of general critical thinking in undergraduate nursing students: experimental study. Texto Contexto-Enfermagem. 2019;29:e20180229.

Swing VK. Early identification of transformation in the proficiency level of critical thinking skills (CTS) for the first semester associate degree nursing (ADN) student. Capella University; 2014.

Dembitsky SL. Creating capable graduate nurses: a study of congruence of objectives and assessments of critical thinking in a southeastern state. Capella University; 2010.

López M, Jiménez JM, Martín-Gil B, Fernández-Castro M, Cao MJ, Frutos M, et al. The impact of an educational intervention on nursing students’ critical thinking skills: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;85:104305.

Wong SHV, Kowitlawakul Y. Exploring perceptions and barriers in developing critical thinking and clinical reasoning of nursing students: a qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;95:104600.

Azizi-Fini I, Hajibagheri A, Adib-Hajbaghery M. Critical thinking skills in nursing students: a comparison between freshmen and senior students. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2015;4(1).

Carter AG, Creedy DK, Sidebotham M. Measuring critical thinking in pre-registration midwifery students: a multi-method approach. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;61:169–74.

Scheffer BK, Rubenfeld MG. A consensus statement on critical thinking in nursing. SLACK Incorporated Thorofare, NJ; 2000. pp. 352–9.

Paul SA. Assessment of critical thinking: a Delphi study. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;34(11):1357–60.

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Guilford JP. Psychometric methods. 1954.

Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(1):84–99.

Sosu E. The development and psychometric validation of a critical thinking disposition scale. Think Skills Creativity. 2013;9:107–19.

Wellington J, Szczerbinski M. Research methods for the social sciences. A&C Black; 2007.

Hancock G, Mueller R. Stractural equation modeling a second cource (second edi) information age publishing. 2020.

Yockey RD. Validation study of the critical thinking dispositions scale: a brief report. North Am J Psychol. 2016;18(1).

Gerdts-Andresen T, Hansen MT, Grøndahl VA. Educational Effectiveness: validation of an instrument to measure students’ critical thinking and Disposition. Int J Instruction. 2022;15(1):685–700.

Luiz FS, Leite ICG, Carvalho PHBd, Püschel VAA, Braga LM, Dutra HS, et al. Validity evidence of the critical thinking Disposition Scale, Brazilian version. Acta Paulista De Enfermagem. 2021;34:eAPE00413.

Bravo MJ, Galiana L, Rodrigo MF, Navarro-Perez JJ, Oliver A. An adaptation of the critical thinking disposition scale in Spanish youth. Think Skills Creativity. 2020;38:100748.

Akın A, Hamedoglu MA, Arslan S, Akın Ü, Çelik E, Kaya Ç, et al. The adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the critical thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS). Int J Educational Researchers. 2015;6(1):31–5.

Google Scholar  

Nguyen TV, Kuo CL, Wang CY, Le NT, Nguyen MTT, Chuang YH. Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Vietnamese version of the critical thinking Disposition Scale. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;127:105848.

Ursachi G, Horodnic IA, Zait A. How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Econ Finance. 2015;20:679–86.

Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Conditioning Res. 2005;19(1):231–40.

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the nursing student who participated in this study.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Hossein Bakhtiari-Dovvombaygi, Kosar Pourhasan, Akbar Zare-Kaseb & Amirreza Rashtbarzadeh

Medical Ethics and Law Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Hossein Bakhtiari-Dovvombaygi, Abbas Abbaszadeh & Fariba Borhani

Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Department of Biology and Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Zahra Rahmaty

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Fariba Borhani

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

HBD, and FB, was involved in the conception and organization of the study. KP, AZK, and AR were involved in the execution and data collection of the study; ZR and AA participated in statistical analysis design and/or execution. KP, HBD and AZK, prepared the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the preparation, critical review and all of them approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fariba Borhani .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate, consent for publication.

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Bakhtiari-Dovvombaygi, H., Pourhasan, K., Rahmaty, Z. et al. Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the critical thinking disposition scale: methodological study. BMC Nurs 23 , 463 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02129-y

Download citation

Received : 14 May 2024

Accepted : 27 June 2024

Published : 08 July 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02129-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Critical thinking
• Nursing student
• Psychometric properties

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

• General enquiries: [email protected]