write essay on death penalty

Death Penalty - Essay Samples And Topic Ideas For Free

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, remains a contentious issue in many societies. Essays on this topic could explore the moral, legal, and social arguments surrounding the practice, including discussions on retribution, deterrence, and justice. They might delve into historical trends in the application of the death penalty, the potential for judicial error, and the disparities in its application across different demographic groups. Discussions might also explore the psychological impact on inmates, the families involved, and the society at large. They could also analyze the global trends toward abolition or retention of the death penalty and the factors influencing these trends. A substantial compilation of free essay instances related to Death Penalty you can find at Papersowl. You can use our samples for inspiration to write your own essay, research paper, or just to explore a new topic for yourself.

Death Penalty and Justice

By now, many of us are familiar with the statement, "an eye for an eye," which came from the bible, so it should be followed as holy writ. Then there was Gandhi, who inspired thousands and said, "an eye for an eye will leave us all blind." This begs the question, which option do we pick to be a good moral agent, in the terms of justice that is. Some states in America practice the death penalty, where some states […]

The Controversy of Death Penalty

The death penalty is a very controversial topic in many states. Although the idea of the death penalty does sound terrifying, would you really want a murderer to be given food and shelter for free? Would you want a murderer to get out of jail and still end up killing another innocent person? Imagine if that murder gets out of jail and kills someone in your family; Wouldn’t you want that murderer to be killed as well? Murderers can kill […]

Stephen Nathanson’s “An Eye for an Eye”

According to Stephen Nathanson's "An Eye for an Eye?", he believes that capital punishment should be immediately abolished and that the principle of punishment, "lex talionis" which correlates to the classic saying "an eye for an eye" is not a valid reason for issuing the death penalty in any country, thus, abolishment of Capital Punishment should follow. Throughout the excerpt from his book, Nathanson argues against this principle believing that one, it forces us to "commit highly immoral actions”raping a […]

We will write an essay sample crafted to your needs.

Does the Death Penalty Effectively Deter Crime?

The death penalty in America has been effective since 1608. Throughout the years following the first execution, criminal behaviors have begun to deteriorate. Capital punishment was first formed to deter crime and treason. As a result, it increased the rate of crime, according to researchers. Punishing criminals by death does not effectively deter crime because criminals are not concerned with consequences, apprehension, and judges are not willing to pay the expenses. During the stage of mens rea, thoughts of committing […]

The Death Penalty: Right or Wrong?

The death penalty has been a controversial topic throughout the years and now more than ever, as we argue; Right or Wrong? Moral or Immoral? Constitutional or Unconstitutional? The death penalty also known as capital punishment is a legal process where the state justice sentences an individual to be executed as punishment for a crime committed. The death penalty sentence strongly depends on the severity of the crime, in the US there are 41 crimes that can lead to being […]

About Carlton Franklin

In most other situations, the long-unsolved Westfield Murder would have been a death penalty case. A 57-year-old legal secretary, Lena Triano, was found tied up, raped, beaten, and stabbed in her New Jersey home. A DNA sample from her undergarments connected Carlton Franklin to the scene of the crime. However, fortunately enough for Franklin, he was not convicted until almost four decades after the murder and, in an unusual turn of events, was tried in juvenile court. Franklin was fifteen […]

About the Death Penalty

The death penalty has been a method used as far back as the Eighteenth century B.C. The use of the death penalty was for punishing people for committing relentless crimes. The severity of the punishment were much more inferior in comparison to modern day. These inferior punishments included boiling live bodies, burning at the stake, hanging, and extensive use of the guillotine to decapitate criminals. In the ancient days no laws were established to dictate and regulate the type of […]

The Death Penalty should not be Legal

Imagine you hit your sibling and your mom hits you back to teach that you shouldn't be hitting anyone. Do you really learn not to be violent from that or instead do you learn how it is okay for moms or dads to hit their children in order to teach them something? This is exactly how the death penalty works. The death penalty has been a form of punishment for decades. There are several methods of execution and those are […]

Effectively Solving Society’s Criminality

Has one ever wondered if the person standing or sitting next to them has the potential to be a murderer or a rapist? What do those who are victimized personally or have suffered from a tragic event involving a loved-one or someone near and dear to their heart, expect from the government? Convicted felons of this nature and degree of unlawfulness should be sentenced to death. Psychotic killers and rapists need the ultimate consequences such as the death penalty for […]

Religious Values and Death Penalty

Religious and moral values tell us that killing is wrong. Thou shall not kill. To me, the death penalty is inhumane. Killing people makes us like the murderers that most of us despise. No imperfect system should have the right to decide who lives and who dies. The government is made up of imperfect humans, who make mistakes. The only person that should be able to take life, is god. "An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind". […]

Abolishment of the Death Penalty

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to relate many different criminological theories in regard to capital punishment. We relate many criminological theories such as; cognitive theory, deviant place theory, latent trait theory, differential association theory, behavioral theory, attachment theory, lifestyle theory, and biosocial theory. This paper empirically analyzes the idea that capital punishment is inhumane and should be abolished. We analyze this by taking into consideration false convictions, deterrence of crime, attitudes towards capital punishment, mental illness and juvenile […]

Punishment and the Nature of the Crime

When an individual commits a crime then he/she is given punishment depending on the nature of the crime committed. The US's way of giving punishment to an offender has been criticized for many years. There are 2 types of cases; civil and criminal cases. In civil cases, most of the verdict comprises of jail time or fine amount to be paid. These are not as severe except the one related to money laundering and forgery. On the other hand, criminal […]

The Death Penalty and Juveniles

Introduction: In today's society, many juveniles are being sent to trial without having the chance of getting a fair trial as anyone else would. Many citizens would see juveniles as dangerous individuals, but in my opinion how a teenager acts at home starts at home. Punishing a child for something that could have been solved at home is something that should not have to get worse by giving them the death penalty. The death penalty should not be imposed on […]

Is the Death Penalty “Humane”

What’s the first thing that pops up in your mind when you hear the words Capital Punishment? I’m assuming for most people the first thing that pops up is a criminal sitting on a chair, with all limbs tied down, and some type of mechanism connected to their head. Even though this really isn't the way that it is done, I do not blame people for imagining that type of image because that is how movies usually portray capital punishment. […]

Euthanasia and Death Penalty

Euthanasia and death penalty are two controversy topics, that get a lot of attention in today's life. The subject itself has the roots deep in the beginning of the humankind. It is interesting and maybe useful to learn the answer and if there is right or wrong in those actions. The decision if a person should live or die depends on the state laws. There are both opponents and supporters of the subject. However different the opinions are, the state […]

The Death Penalty is not Worth the Cost

The death penalty is a government practice, used as a punishment for capital crimes such as treason, murder, and genocide to name a few. It has been a controversial topic for many years some countries still use it while others don't. In the United States, each state gets to choose whether they consider it to be legal or not. Which is why in this country 30 states allow it while 20 states have gotten rid of it. It is controversial […]

Ineffectiveness of Death Penalty

Death penalty as a means of punishing crime and discouraging wrong behaviour has suffered opposition from various fronts. Religious leaders argue that it is morally wrong to take someone's life while liberal thinkers claim that there are better ways to punish wrong behaviour other than the death penalty. This debate rages on while statistically, Texas executes more individuals than any other state in the United States of America. America itself also has the highest number of death penalty related deaths […]

Is the Death Penalty Morally Right?

There have been several disputes on whether the death penalty is morally right. Considering the ethical issues with this punishment can help distinguish if it should be denied or accepted. For example, it can be argued that a criminal of extreme offenses should be granted the same level of penance as their crime. During the duration of their sentencing they could repent on their actions and desire another opportunity of freedom. The death penalty should be outlawed because of too […]

Why the Death Penalty is Unjust

Capital punishment being either a justifiable law, or a horrendous, unjust act can be determined based on the perspective of different worldviews. In a traditional Christian perspective, the word of God given to the world in The Holy Bible should only be abided by. The Holy Bible states that no man (or woman) should shed the blood of another man (or woman). Christians are taught to teach a greater amount of sacrifice for the sake of the Lord. Social justice […]

The Death Penalty and People’s Opinions

The death penalty is a highly debated topic that often divided opinion amongst people all around the world. Firstly, let's take a look at our capital punishments, with certain crimes, come different serving times. Most crimes include treason, espionage, murder, large-scale drug trafficking, and murder towards a juror, witness, or a court officer in some cases. These are a few examples compared to the forty-one federal capital offenses to date. When it comes to the death penalty, there are certain […]

The Debate of the Death Penalty

Capital punishment is a moral issue that is often scrutinized due to the taking of someone’s life. This is in large part because of the views many have toward the rule of law or an acceptance to the status quo. In order to get a true scope of the death penalty, it is best to address potential biases from a particular ethical viewpoint. By looking at it from several theories of punishment, selecting the most viable theory makes it a […]

The History of the Death Penalty

The History of the death penalty goes as far back as ancient China and Babylon. However, the first recorded death sentence took place in 16th Century BC Egypt, where executions were carried out with an ax. Since the very beginning, people were treated according to their social status; those wealthy were rarely facing brutal executions; on the contrary, most of the population was facing cruel executions. For instance, in the 5th Century BC, the Roman Law of the Twelve Tablets […]

Death Penalty is Immoral

Let's say your child grabs a plate purposely. You see them grab the plate, smash it on the ground and look you straight in the eyes. Are they deserving of a punishment? Now what if I say your child is three years old. A three year old typically doesn't know they have done something wrong. But since your child broke that one plate, your kid is being put on death row. You may be thinking, that is too harsh of […]

The Death Penalty in the United States

The United States is the "land of the free, home of the brave" and the death penalty (American National Anthem). Globally, America stands number five in carrying executions (Lockie). Since its resurrection in 1976, the year in which the Supreme Court reestablished the constitutionality of the death penalty, more than 1,264 people have been executed, predominantly by the medium of lethal injection (The Guardian). Almost all death penalty cases entangle the execution of assassins; although, they may also be applied […]

Cost of the Death Penalty

The death penalty costs more than life in prison. According to Fox News correspondent Dan Springer, the State of California spent 4 billion dollars to execute 13 individuals, in addition to the net spend of an estimated $64,000 per prisoner every year. Springer (2011) documents how the death penalty convictions declined due to economic reasons. The state spends up to 3 times more when seeking a death penalty than when pursuing a life in prison without the possibility of parole. […]

The Solution to the Death Penalty

There has never been a time when the United States of America was free from criminals indulging in killing, stealing, exploiting people, and even selling illegal items. Naturally, America refuses to tolerate the crimes committed by those who view themselves as above the law. Once these convicts are apprehended, they are brought to justice. In the past, these criminals often faced an ultimate punishment: the death penalty. Mercy was a foreign concept due to their underdeveloped understanding of the value […]

Costs: Death Penalty Versus Prison Costs

The Conservatives Concerned Organization challenges the notion that the death penalty is more cost effective compared to prison housing and feeding costs. The organization argues that the death penalty is an expensive lengthy and complicated process concluding that it is not only a bloated program that delays justice and bogs down the enforcement of the law, it is also an inefficient justice process that diverts financial resources from law enforcement programs that could protect individuals and save lives. According to […]

Death Penalty as a Source of Constant Controversy

The death penalty has been a source of almost constant controversy for hundreds of years, splitting the population down the middle with people supporting the death penalty and people that think it is unnecessary. The amount of people that are been against the death penalty has grown in recent years, causing the amount of executions to dwindle down to where there is less than one hundred every year. This number will continue to lessen as more and more people decide […]

Death Penalty is Politically Just?

Being wrongfully accused is unimaginable, but think if you were wrongfully accused and the ultimate punishment was death. Death penalty is one of the most controversial issues in today's society, but what is politically just? When a crime is committed most assume that the only acceptable consequence is to be put to death rather than thinking of another form of punishment. Religiously the death penalty is unfair because the, "USCCB concludes prisoners can change and find redemption through ministry outreach, […]

George Walker Bush and Death Penalty

George Walker Bush, a former U.S. president, and governor of Texas, once spoke, "I don't think you should support the death penalty to seek revenge. I don't think that's right. I think the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves other people's lives." The death penalty, or capital punishment, refers to the execution of a criminal convicted of a capital offense. With many criminals awaiting execution on death row, the death penalty has been a debated topic […]

Additional Example Essays

• Death Penalty Should be Abolished
• Main Reasons of Seperation from Great Britain
• Leadership and the Army Profession
• Letter From Birmingham Jail Rhetorical Analysis
• Why Abortion Should be Illegal
• Logical Fallacies in Letter From Birmingham Jail
• How the Roles of Women and Men Were Portrayed in "A Doll's House"
• Ethical or Unethical Behavior in Business
• Does Arrest Reduce Domestic Violence
• Recycling Should be Mandatory
• Why I Want to Be an US Army Officer

How To Write an Essay About Death Penalty

Understanding the topic.

When writing an essay about the death penalty, the first step is to understand the depth and complexities of the topic. The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is a legal process where a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. This topic is highly controversial and evokes strong emotions on both sides of the debate. It's crucial to approach this subject with sensitivity and a balanced perspective, acknowledging the moral, legal, and ethical considerations involved. Research is key in this initial phase, as it's important to gather facts, statistics, and viewpoints from various sources to have a well-rounded understanding of the topic. This foundation will set the tone for your essay, guiding your argument and supporting your thesis.

Structuring the Argument

The next step is structuring your argument. In an essay about the death penalty, it's vital to present a clear thesis statement that outlines your stance on the issue. Are you for or against it? What are the reasons behind your position? The body of your essay should then systematically support your thesis through well-structured arguments. Each paragraph should focus on a specific aspect of the death penalty, such as its ethical implications, its effectiveness as a deterrent to crime, or the risk of wrongful convictions. Ensure that each point is backed up by evidence and examples, and remember to address counterarguments. This not only shows that you have considered multiple viewpoints but also strengthens your position by demonstrating why these opposing arguments may be less valid.

Exploring Ethical and Moral Dimensions

An essential aspect of writing an essay on the death penalty is exploring its ethical and moral dimensions. This involves delving into philosophical debates about the value of human life, justice, and retribution. It's important to discuss the moral justifications that are often used to defend the death penalty, such as the idea of 'an eye for an eye,' and to critically evaluate these arguments. Equally important is exploring the ethical arguments against the death penalty, including the potential for innocent people to be executed and the question of whether the state should have the power to take a life. This section of the essay should challenge readers to think deeply about their values and the principles of a just society.

Concluding Thoughts

In conclusion, revisit your thesis and summarize the key points made in your essay. This is your final opportunity to reinforce your argument and leave a lasting impression on your readers. Discuss the broader implications of the death penalty in society and consider potential future developments in this area. You might also want to offer recommendations or pose questions that encourage further reflection on the topic. Remember, a strong conclusion doesn't just restate what has been said; it provides closure and offers new insights, prompting readers to continue thinking about the subject long after they have finished reading your essay.

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

Essays About the Death Penalty: Top 5 Examples and Prompts

The death penalty is a major point of contention all around the world. Read our guide so you can write well-informed essays about the death penalty. 

Out of all the issues at the forefront of public discourse today, few are as hotly debated as the death penalty. As its name suggests, the death penalty involves the execution of a criminal as punishment for their transgressions. The death penalty has always been, and continues to be, an emotionally and politically charged essay topic.

Arguments about the death penalty are more motivated by feelings and emotions; many proponents are people seeking punishment for the killers of their loved ones, while many opponents are mourning the loss of loved ones executed through the death penalty. There may also be a religious aspect to support and oppose the policy. 

1. The Issues of Death Penalties and Social Justice in The United States (Author Unknown)

2. serving justice with death penalty by rogelio elliott, 3. can you be christian and support the death penalty by matthew schmalz, 4.  death penalty: persuasive essay by jerome glover, 5. the death penalty by kamala harris, top 5 writing prompts on essays about the death penalty, 1. death penalty: do you support or oppose it, 2. how has the death penalty changed throughout history, 3. the status of capital punishment in your country, 4. death penalty and poverty, 5. does the death penalty serve as a deterrent for serious crimes, 6. what are the pros and cons of the death penalty vs. life imprisonment , 7. how is the death penalty different in japan vs. the usa, 8. why do some states use the death penalty and not others, 9. what are the most common punishments selected by prisoners for execution, 10. should the public be allowed to view an execution, 11. discuss the challenges faced by the judicial system in obtaining lethal injection doses, 12. should the death penalty be used for juveniles, 13. does the death penalty have a racial bias to it.

“Executing another person only creates a cycle of vengeance and death where if all of the rationalities and political structures are dropped, the facts presented at the end of the day is that a man is killed because he killed another man, so when does it end? Human life is to be respected and appreciated, not thrown away as if it holds no meaningful value.”

This essay discusses several reasons to oppose the death penalty in the United States. First, the author cites the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, saying that the death penalty is inhumane and deprives people of life. Human life should be respected, and death should not be responded to with another death. In addition, the author cites evidence showing that the death penalty does not deter crime nor gives closure to victims’ families. 

Check out these essays about police brutality .

“Capital punishment follows the constitution and does not break any of the amendments. Specific people deserve to be punished in this way for the crime they commit. It might immoral to people but that is not the point of the death penalty. The death penalty is not “killing for fun”. The death penalty serves justice. When justice is served, it prevents other people from becoming the next serial killer. It’s simple, the death penalty strikes fear.”

Elliott supports the death penalty, writing that it gives criminals what they deserve. After all, those who commit “small” offenses will not be executed anyway. In addition, it reinforces the idea that justice comes to wrongdoers. Finally, he states that the death penalty is constitutional and is supported by many Americans.

“The letter states that this development of Catholic doctrine is consistent with the thought of the two previous popes: St. Pope John Paul II and Benedict XVI. St. John Paul II maintained that capital punishment should be reserved only for “absolute necessity.” Benedict XVI also supported efforts to eliminate the death penalty. Most important, however, is that Pope Francis is emphasizing an ethic of forgiveness. The Pope has argued that social justice applies to all citizens. He also believes that those who harm society should make amends through acts that affirm life, not death.”

Schmalz discusses the Catholic position on the death penalty. Many early Catholic leaders believed that the death penalty was justified; however, Pope Francis writes that “modern methods of imprisonment effectively protect society from criminals,” and executions are unnecessary. Therefore, the Catholic Church today opposes the death penalty and strives to protect life.

“There are many methods of execution, like electrocution, gas chamber, hanging, firing squad and lethal injection. For me, I just watched once on TV, but it’s enough to bring me nightmares. We only live once and we will lose anything we once had without life. Life is precious and can’t just be taken away that easily. In my opinion, I think Canada shouldn’t adopt the death penalty as its most severe form of criminal punishment.”

Glover’s essay acknowledges reasons why people might support the death penalty; however, he believes that these are not enough for him to support it. He believes capital punishment is inhumane and should not be implemented in Canada. It deprives people of a second chance and does not teach wrongdoers much of a lesson. In addition, it is inhumane and deprives people of their right to life. 

“Let’s be clear: as a former prosecutor, I absolutely and strongly believe there should be serious and swift consequences when one person kills another. I am unequivocal in that belief. We can — and we should — always pursue justice in the name of victims and give dignity to the families that grieve. But in our democracy, a death sentence carried out by the government does not constitute justice for those who have been put to death and proven innocent after the fact.”

This short essay was written by the then-presidential candidate and current U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris to explain her campaign’s stance on the death penalty. First, she believes it does not execute justice and is likely to commit injustice by sentencing innocent people to death. In addition, it is said to disproportionally affect nonwhite people. Finally, it is more fiscally responsible for abolishing capital punishment, as it uses funds that could be used for education and healthcare. 

This topic always comes first to mind when thinking of what to write. For a strong argumentative essay, consider the death penalty and list its pros and cons. Then, conclude whether or not it would be beneficial to reinstate or keep the policy. There is an abundance of sources you can gather inspiration from, including the essay examples listed above and countless other online sources.

People have been put to death as a punishment since the dawn of recorded history, but as morals and technology have changed, the application of the death penalty has evolved. This essay will explore how the death penalty has been used and carried out throughout history.

This essay will examine both execution methods and when capital punishment is ordered. A few points to explore in this essay include:

• Thousands of years ago, “an eye for an eye” was the standard. How were executions carried out in ancient history?
• The religious context of executions during the middle ages is worth exploring. When was someone burned at the stake?
• The guillotine became a popular method of execution during the renaissance period. How does this method compare to both ancient execution methods and modern methods?
• The most common execution methods in the modern era include the firing squad, hanging, lethal injections, gas chambers, and electrocution. How do these methods compare to older forms of execution?

Choose a country, preferably your home country, and look into the death penalty status: is it being implemented or not? If you wish, you can also give a brief history of the death penalty in your chosen country and your thoughts. You do not necessarily need to write about your own country; however, picking your homeland may provide better insight. 

Critics of the death penalty argue that it is anti-poor, as a poor person accused of a crime punishable by death lacks the resources to hire a good lawyer to defend them adequately. For your essay, reflect on this issue and write about your thoughts. Is it inhumane for the poor? After all, poor people will not have sufficient resources to hire good lawyers, regardless of the punishment. 

This is one of the biggest debates in the justice system. While the justice system has been set up to punish, it should also deter people from committing crimes. Does the death penalty do an adequate job at deterring crimes? 

This essay should lay out the evidence that shows how the death penalty either does or does not deter crime. A few points to explore in this essay include:

• Which crimes have the death penalty as the ultimate punishment?
• How does the murder rate compare to states that do not have the death penalty in states with the death penalty?
• Are there confounding factors that must be taken into consideration with this comparison? How do they play a role?

This is one of the most straightforward ways to explore the death penalty. If the death penalty is to be removed from criminal cases, it must be replaced with something else. The most logical alternative is life imprisonment. 

There is no “right” answer to this question, but a strong argumentative essay could take one side over another in this death penalty debate. A few points to explore in this essay include:

• Some people would rather be put to death instead of imprisoned in a cell for life. Should people have the right to decide which punishment they accept?
• What is the cost of the death penalty versus imprisoning someone for life? Even though it can be expensive to imprison someone for life, remember that most death penalty cases are appealed numerous times before execution.
• Would the death penalty be more acceptable if specific execution methods were used instead of others?

Few first-world countries still use the death penalty. However, Japan and the United States are two of the biggest users of the death sentence.

This is an interesting compare and contrast essay worth exploring. In addition, this essay can explore the differences in how executions are carried out. Some of the points to explore include:

• What are the execution methods countries use? The execution method in the United States can vary from state to state, but Japan typically uses hanging. Is this considered a cruel and unusual punishment?
• In the United States, death row inmates know their execution date. In Japan, they do not. So which is better for the prisoner?
• How does the public in the United States feel about the death penalty versus public opinion in Japan? Should this influence when, how, and if executions are carried out in the respective countries?

In the United States, justice is typically administered at the state level unless a federal crime has been committed. So why do some states have the death penalty and not others?

This essay will examine which states have the death penalty and make the most use of this form of punishment as part of the legal system. A few points worth exploring in this essay include:

• When did various states outlaw the death penalty (if they do not use it today)?
• Which states execute the most prisoners? Some states to mention are Texas and Oklahoma.
• Do the states that have the death penalty differ in when the death penalty is administered?
• Is this sentence handed down by the court system or by the juries trying the individual cases in states with the death penalty?

It might be interesting to see if certain prisoners have selected a specific execution method to make a political statement. Numerous states allow prisoners to select how they will be executed. The most common methods include lethal injections, firing squads, electric chairs, gas chambers, and hanging. 

It might be interesting to see if certain prisoners have selected a specific execution method to make a political statement. Some of the points this essay might explore include:

• When did these different execution methods become options for execution?
• Which execution methods are the most common in the various states that offer them?
• Is one method considered more “humane” than others? If so, why?

One of the topics recently discussed is whether the public should be allowed to view an execution.

There are many potential directions to go with this essay, and all of these points are worth exploring. A few topics to explore in this essay include:

• In the past, executions were carried out in public places. There are a few countries, particularly in the Middle East, where this is still the case. So why were executions carried out in public?
• In some situations, individuals directly involved in the case, such as the victim’s loved ones, are permitted to view the execution. Does this bring a sense of closure?
• Should executions be carried out in private? Does this reduce transparency in the justice system?

Lethal injection is one of the most common modes of execution. The goal is to put the person to sleep and remove their pain. Then, a cocktail is used to stop their heart. Unfortunately, many companies have refused to provide states with the drugs needed for a lethal injection. A few points to explore include:

• Doctors and pharmacists have said it is against the oath they took to “not harm.” Is this true? What impact does this have?
• If someone is giving the injection without medical training, how does this impact the prisoner?
• Have states decided to use other more “harmful” modes of execution because they can’t get what they need for the lethal injection?

There are certain crimes, such as murder, where the death penalty is a possible punishment across the country. Even though minors can be tried as adults in some situations, they typically cannot be given the death penalty.

It might be interesting to see what legal experts and victims of juvenile capital crimes say about this important topic. A few points to explore include:

• How does the brain change and evolve as someone grows?
• Do juveniles have a higher rate of rehabilitation than adults?
• Should the wishes of the victim’s family play a role in the final decision?

The justice system, and its unjust impact on minorities , have been a major area of research during the past few decades. It might be worth exploring if the death penalty is disproportionately used in cases involving minorities. 

It might be worth looking at numbers from Amnesty International or the Innocence Project to see what the numbers show. A strong essay might also propose ways to make justice system cases more equitable and fair. A few points worth exploring include:

• Of the cases where the death penalty has been levied, what percentage of the cases involve a minority perpetrator?
• Do stays of execution get granted more often in cases involving white people versus minorities?
• Do white people get handed a sentence of life in prison without parole more often than people of minority descent?

If you’d like to learn more, our writer explains how to write an argumentative essay in this guide.

For help with your essay, check our round-up of best essay writing apps .

5 Death Penalty Essays Everyone Should Know

Capital punishment is an ancient practice. It’s one that human rights defenders strongly oppose and consider as inhumane and cruel. In 2019, Amnesty International reported the lowest number of executions in about a decade. Most executions occurred in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Egypt . The United States is the only developed western country still using capital punishment. What does this say about the US? Here are five essays about the death penalty everyone should read:

“When We Kill”

By: Nicholas Kristof | From: The New York Times 2019

In this excellent essay, Pulitizer-winner Nicholas Kristof explains how he first became interested in the death penalty. He failed to write about a man on death row in Texas. The man, Cameron Todd Willingham, was executed in 2004. Later evidence showed that the crime he supposedly committed – lighting his house on fire and killing his three kids – was more likely an accident. In “When We Kill,” Kristof puts preconceived notions about the death penalty under the microscope. These include opinions such as only guilty people are executed, that those guilty people “deserve” to die, and the death penalty deters crime and saves money. Based on his investigations, Kristof concludes that they are all wrong.

Nicholas Kristof has been a Times columnist since 2001. He’s the winner of two Pulitizer Prices for his coverage of China and the Darfur genocide.

“An Inhumane Way of Death”

By: Willie Jasper Darden, Jr.

Willie Jasper Darden, Jr. was on death row for 14 years. In his essay, he opens with the line, “Ironically, there is probably more hope on death row than would be found in most other places.” He states that everyone is capable of murder, questioning if people who support capital punishment are just as guilty as the people they execute. Darden goes on to say that if every murderer was executed, there would be 20,000 killed per day. Instead, a person is put on death row for something like flawed wording in an appeal. Darden feels like he was picked at random, like someone who gets a terminal illness. This essay is important to read as it gives readers a deeper, more personal insight into death row.

Willie Jasper Darden, Jr. was sentenced to death in 1974 for murder. During his time on death row, he advocated for his innocence and pointed out problems with his trial, such as the jury pool that excluded black people. Despite worldwide support for Darden from public figures like the Pope, Darden was executed in 1988.

“We Need To Talk About An Injustice”

By: Bryan Stevenson | From: TED 2012

This piece is a transcript of Bryan Stevenson’s 2012 TED talk, but we feel it’s important to include because of Stevenson’s contributions to criminal justice. In the talk, Stevenson discusses the death penalty at several points. He points out that for years, we’ve been taught to ask the question, “Do people deserve to die for their crimes?” Stevenson brings up another question we should ask: “Do we deserve to kill?” He also describes the American death penalty system as defined by “error.” Somehow, society has been able to disconnect itself from this problem even as minorities are disproportionately executed in a country with a history of slavery.

Bryan Stevenson is a lawyer, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, and author. He’s argued in courts, including the Supreme Court, on behalf of the poor, minorities, and children. A film based on his book Just Mercy was released in 2019 starring Michael B. Jordan and Jamie Foxx.

“I Know What It’s Like To Carry Out Executions”

By: S. Frank Thompson | From: The Atlantic 2019

In the death penalty debate, we often hear from the family of the victims and sometimes from those on death row. What about those responsible for facilitating an execution? In this opinion piece, a former superintendent from the Oregon State Penitentiary outlines his background. He carried out the only two executions in Oregon in the past 55 years, describing it as having a “profound and traumatic effect” on him. In his decades working as a correctional officer, he concluded that the death penalty is not working . The United States should not enact federal capital punishment.

Frank Thompson served as the superintendent of OSP from 1994-1998. Before that, he served in the military and law enforcement. When he first started at OSP, he supported the death penalty. He changed his mind when he observed the protocols firsthand and then had to conduct an execution.

“There Is No Such Thing As Closure on Death Row”

By: Paul Brown | From: The Marshall Project 2019

This essay is from Paul Brown, a death row inmate in Raleigh, North Carolina. He recalls the moment of his sentencing in a cold courtroom in August. The prosecutor used the term “closure” when justifying a death sentence. Who is this closure for? Brown theorizes that the prosecutors are getting closure as they end another case, but even then, the cases are just a way to further their careers. Is it for victims’ families? Brown is doubtful, as the death sentence is pursued even when the families don’t support it. There is no closure for Brown or his family as they wait for his execution. Vivid and deeply-personal, this essay is a must-read for anyone who wonders what it’s like inside the mind of a death row inmate.

Paul Brown has been on death row since 2000 for a double murder. He is a contributing writer to Prison Writers and shares essays on topics such as his childhood, his life as a prisoner, and more.

You may also like

Academia in Times of Genocide: Why are Students Across the World Protesting?

Pinkwashing 101: Definition, History, Examples

15 Inspiring Quotes for Black History Month

10 Inspiring Ways Women Are Fighting for Equality

15 Trusted Charities Fighting for Clean Water

15 Trusted Charities Supporting Trans People

15 Political Issues We Must Address

15 Trusted Charities Fighting for LGBTQ+ Rights

16 Inspiring Civil Rights Leaders You Should Know

15 Trusted Charities Fighting for Housing Rights

15 Examples of Gender Inequality in Everyday Life

11 Approaches to Alleviate World Hunger 

About the author, emmaline soken-huberty.

Emmaline Soken-Huberty is a freelance writer based in Portland, Oregon. She started to become interested in human rights while attending college, eventually getting a concentration in human rights and humanitarianism. LGBTQ+ rights, women’s rights, and climate change are of special concern to her. In her spare time, she can be found reading or enjoying Oregon’s natural beauty with her husband and dog.

Top 10 Pro & Con Arguments

Life without Parole

Retribution

Victims’ Families

Methods of Execution

Medical Professionals’ Participation

Federal Death Penalty

1. Legality

The United States is one of 55 countries globally with a legal death penalty, according to Amnesty International. As of Mar. 24, 2021, within the US, 27 states had a legal death penalty (though 3 of those states had a moratorium on the punishment’s use).

Proponents of the death penalty being legal argue that such a harsh penalty is needed for criminals who have committed the worst crimes, that the punishment deters crime, and that the US Supreme Court has upheld the death penalty as constitutional.

Opponents of the death penalty being legal argue that the punishment is cruel and unusual, and, thus, unconstitutional, that innocent people are put to death for crimes they did not commit, and that the penalty is disproportionately applied to people of color.

Read More about This Debate:

Should the Death Penalty Be Legal?

ProCon.org, “International Death Penalty Status,” deathpenalty.procon.org, May 19, 2021 ProCon.org, “Should the Death Penalty Be Legal?,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Sep. 20, 2021 ProCon.org, “States with the Death Penalty, Death Penalty Bans, and Death Penalty Moratoriums,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Mar. 24, 2021

2. Life without Parole

Life without Parole (also called LWOP) is suggested by some as an alternative punishment for the death penalty.

Proponents of replacing the death penalty with life without parole argue that imprisoning someone for the duration of their life is more humane than the death penalty, that LWOP is a more fitting penalty that allows the criminal to think about what they’ve done, and that LWOP reduces the chances of executing an innocent person.

Opponents of replacing the death penalty with life without parole argue that LWOP is just an alternate death penalty and parole should always be a consideration even if the prisoner never earns the privilege. While other opponents argue that life without parole is not a harsh enough punishment for murderers and terrorists.

Should Life without Parole Replace the Death Penalty?

ProCon.org, “Should Life without Parole Replace the Death Penalty?,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Sep. 20, 2021

3. Deterrence

One of the main justifications for maintaining a death penalty is that the punishment may prevent people from committing crimes so as to not risk being sentenced to death.

Proponents who argue that the death penalty is a deterrent to capital crimes state that such a harsh penalty is needed to discourage people from murder and terrorism.

Opponents who argue that the death penalty is not a deterrent to capital crimes state that there is no evidence to support the claim that the penalty is a deterrent.

Does the Death Penalty Deter Crime?

ProCon.org, “Does the Death Penalty Deter Crime?,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Sep. 20, 2021

4. Retribution

Retribution in this debate is the idea that the death penalty is needed to bring about justice for the victims, the victims’ families, and/or society at large.

Proponents who argue that the death penalty is needed as retribution argue that “an eye for an eye” is appropriate, that the punishment should match the crime, and that the penalty is needed as a moral balance to the wrong done by the criminal.

Opponents who argue that the death penalty is not needed as retribution argue that reformative justice is more productive, that innocent people are often killed in the search for retribution, and that “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.”

Should the Death Penalty Be Used for Retribution for Victims and/or Society?

ProCon.org, “Should the Death Penalty Be Used for Retribution for Victims and/or Society?,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Sep. 20, 2021

5. Victims’ Families

Whether the death penalty can bring about some sort of closure or solace to the victims’ families after a horrible, life-changing experience has long been debated and used by both proponents and opponents of the death penalty.

Proponents who argue that the death penalty is needed to bring about closure and solace to victims’ families argue that the finality of the death penalty is needed for families to move on and not live in fear of the criminal getting out of prison.

Opponents who argue that the death penalty is needed to bring about closure and solace to victims’ families argue that retributive “justice” does not bring closure for anyone and that the death penalty can take years of media-friendly appeals to enact.

Does the Death Penalty Offer Closure or Solace to Victims’ Families?

ProCon.org, “Does the Death Penalty Offer Closure or Solace to Victims’ Families?,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Sep. 20, 2021

6. Methods of Execution

Because the drugs used for lethal injection have become difficult to obtain, some states are turning to other methods of execution. For example, South Carolina recently enacted legislation to allow for the firing squad and electric chair if lethal injection is not available at the time of the execution.

Proponents of alternate methods of execution argue that the state and federal government have an obligation to carry out the sentence handed down, and that, given the recent botched lethal injection executions, other methods may be more humane.

Opponents of alternate methods of execution argue that we should not be reverting to less humane methods of execution, and that the drug companies’ objection to use of lethal injection drugs should signal a need to abolish the penalty altogether.

Should States Authorize Other Methods of Execution Such as Hanging or the Firing Squad?

ProCon.org, “Should States Authorize Other Methods of Execution Such as Hanging or the Firing Squad?,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Sep. 20, 2021

7. Innocence

Reports indicate over 150 innocent people have been found not-guilty and exonerated since the death penalty was reinstated in 1973.

Proponents of abolishing the death penalty because innocent people may be executed argue that humans are fallible and the justice system is flawed, putting more Black and brown people on death row than are guilty of capital crimes, and that we cannot risk executing one innocent person just to carry about retributive “justice.”

Opponents of abolishing the death penalty because innocent people may be executed argue that the fact that death row inmates have been exonerated proves that the checks and balances to prevent innocent people from being executed are in place and working well, almost eliminating the chance that an innocent person will be executed.

Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished Because Innocent People May Be Executed?

ProCon.org, “Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished Because Innocent People May Be Executed?,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Sep. 20, 2021

8. Morality

Both religious and secular debates have continued about whether it is moral for humans to kill one another, even in the name of justice, and whether executing people makes for a moral and just government.

Proponents who argue that the death penalty is a moral punishment state that “an eye for an eye” is justified to promote a good and just society than shuns evil.

Opponents who argue that the death penalty is an immoral punishment state that humans should not kill other humans, no matter the reasons, because killing is killing.

Is the Death Penalty Immoral?

ProCon.org, “Is the Death Penalty Immoral?,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Sep. 20, 2021

9. Medical Professionals’ Participation

With the introduction of lethal injection as execution method, states began asking that medical professionals participate in executions to ensure the injections were administered properly and to provide medical care if the execution were botched.

Proponents who argue that medical professionals can participate in executions ethically state that doctors and others ensure that the execution is not “cruel or unusual,” and ensure that the person being executed receives medical care during the execution.

Opponents who argue that medical professionals cannot participate in executions ethically state that doctors and others should keep people alive instead of participate in killing, and that the medicalization of execution leads to a false acceptance of the practice.

Is Participation in Executions Ethical for Medical Professionals?

ProCon.org, “Is Participation in Executions Ethical for Medical Professionals?,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Sep. 20, 2021

10. Federal Death Penalty

The federal death penalty has only been carried out 16 times since its reinstatement after Furman v. Georgia in 1988: twice in 2001, once in 2003, ten times in 2020, and three times in 2021. Several moratoriums have been put in place by presidents in the interims. Under President Joe Biden, the US Justice Department has enacted a moratorium on the death penalty, reversing President Donald Trump’s policy of carrying out federal executions.

Proponents of keeping the federal death penalty argue that justice must be carried out to deter crime and offer closure to families, and that the federal government has an obligation to enact the sentences handed down by the courts.

Proponents of banning the federal death penalty argue that the United States federal government should set an example for the states with a ban, and that only a ban will prevent the next president from executing the prisoners on death row.

Should the US President Reinstate the Federal Death Penalty?

ProCon.org, “Most Recent Executions in Each US State,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Aug. 26, 2021 ProCon.org, “Should the US President Reinstate the Federal Death Penalty?,” deathpenalty.procon.org, Sep. 20, 2021

People who view this page may also like:

• States with the Death Penalty and States with Death Penalty Bans
• US Executions by Race, Crime, Method, Age, Gender, State, & Year
• Should Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal?

ProCon/Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. 325 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 200 Chicago, Illinois 60654 USA

Natalie Leppard Managing Editor [email protected]

© 2023 Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved

• History of the Death Penalty
• Top Pro & Con Quotes
• Historical Timeline
• Did You Know?
• States with the Death Penalty, Death Penalty Bans, and Death Penalty Moratoriums
• The ESPY List: US Executions 1608-2002
• Federal Capital Offenses
• Death Row Inmates
• Critical Thinking Video Series: Thomas Edison Electrocutes Topsy the Elephant, Jan. 4, 1903

Cite This Page

• Artificial Intelligence
• Private Prisons
• Space Colonization
• Social Media
• Death Penalty
• School Uniforms
• Video Games
• Animal Testing
• Gun Control
• Banned Books
• Teachers’ Corner

ProCon.org is the institutional or organization author for all ProCon.org pages. Proper citation depends on your preferred or required style manual. Below are the proper citations for this page according to four style manuals (in alphabetical order): the Modern Language Association Style Manual (MLA), the Chicago Manual of Style (Chicago), the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA), and Kate Turabian's A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations (Turabian). Here are the proper bibliographic citations for this page according to four style manuals (in alphabetical order):

[Editor's Note: The APA citation style requires double spacing within entries.]

[Editor’s Note: The MLA citation style requires double spacing within entries.]

Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty

Click the buttons below to view arguments and testimony on each topic.

The death penalty deters future murders.

Retribution

A just society requires the taking of a life for a life.

The risk of executing the innocent precludes the use of the death penalty.

Arbitrariness & Discrimination

The death penalty is applied unfairly and should not be used.

Shiny Essays Blog

Death penalty argumentative essay example.

The death penalty is one of the most controversial topics in modern society. It has been at the center of heated debates for decades, with both sides passionately arguing why they believe it should or shouldn’t be used as a form of punishment. While it is clear that there are strong arguments on both sides, this essay will focus on why capital punishment should be abolished and argue against its use in all cases.

A good argumentative essay should explore various aspects surrounding the death penalty including moral and ethical implications, its effectiveness as a deterrent to crime, and international trends towards abolition. Additionally, the long-term psychological effects on victims' families will also be discussed to demonstrate why capital punishment should not be an option for any criminal justice system. Finally, alternative forms of punishment that could replace the death penalty will also be explored.

Why death penalty topic is important and controversial?

The death penalty is one of the most controversial topics in modern society. It has been debated for centuries as to whether it should be abolished or not, and it is a topic that still stirs up strong emotions on both sides of the argument. On one side, there are those who believe it serves as an effective deterrent to crime while on the other side, there are those who feel that it violates basic human rights and is morally wrong. This makes the topic highly important and controversial as it involves difficult questions of morality and justice.

What moral/ethical considerations surround this topic?

The topic of the death penalty or capital punishment is surrounded by various moral and ethical considerations. One of the most significant concerns is the possibility of cruel and unusual punishment, especially when it comes to the method of execution, such as lethal injection. Another ethical issue is the risk of putting an innocent person to death, which is a real concern despite the legal process and death penalty laws in place to prevent such occurrences. The decision to impose the ultimate punishment of death should also consider the severity of the crime committed, such as heinous crimes, and whether there is solid and conclusive evidence to support the death penalty cases. Ultimately, human life is at the center of this debate, and moral and ethical considerations must be taken seriously to ensure that justice is served fairly and justly.

One of the main moral/ethical considerations surrounding capital punishment is whether or not it can be considered cruel and unusual punishment. According to many religious groups, the death penalty is seen as immoral and a violation of basic human rights. There are also arguments that suggest it fails to address the underlying issues that lead to criminal behavior in the first place. Additionally, there are concerns about whether or not capital punishment actually serves as an effective deterrent to crime and if it has been unfairly applied to certain groups.

History and Use of the Death Penalty

The death penalty has been used as a form of punishment for centuries, with the first known use being in the Code of King Hammurabi in Babylon in 1750 BC. Throughout history, it has been used to punish a wide range of offenses including treason, murder, rape, and other violent crimes. It was also used in some societies as a form of punishment for dissent and political opposition. In more recent times, though, its use has become controversial due to questions about its effectiveness as a deterrent and the moral implications surrounding taking away someone's life.

In the United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty was not unconstitutional in 1976 and then it has been implemented by 31 states and is applied to federal crimes such as terrorism. At present, there have been 1,527 executions since 1976 with Texas having the highest number at 543 executions followed by Virginia with 113 executions. However, this is only a small fraction compared to other countries such as China where it is believed that thousands are executed every year without trial or due process of law.

The international trend towards abolition has also increased significantly over time with more than 140 countries eliminating the death penalty either by practice or law. In addition to this growing trend towards abolishing capital punishment worldwide, several studies have found that it does not act as a significant deterrent for crime when compared to alternative forms of punishment such as life imprisonment without parole. These findings suggest that capital punishment should no longer be an option for any criminal justice system.

Writing an Effective Argumentative Essay

When writing an argumentative essay on the death penalty, it is important to have a clear thesis statement that presents your overall position. This should be supported by evidence and examples from reliable sources such as government reports, academic studies, or newspaper articles. It is also important to consider the opposing viewpoint and address any counterarguments in your paper. Finally, you should make sure to end the essay with a conclusion that summarizes the main points of your argument and provides an effective call to action for readers.

By discussing all aspects of this highly controversial topic including its history, moral implications, effectiveness as a deterrent, and the international trend toward abolishment - we can come to the conclusion that capital punishment should no longer be used in any criminal justice system.

Above all, it is important to remember that everyone has the right to life and no one should be denied this basic human right regardless of the crime they may have committed. Therefore, it is essential that we work towards ending the use of capital punishment worldwide and instead focus on alternative forms of justice that can provide equal treatment for all offenders.

By taking these steps, we can ensure a more humane and just criminal justice system in our world today.

Choosing a stance

When it comes to the death penalty, you can have three different stances. You can be pro-death penalty, meaning that you think it is okay and should be used as a form of punishment. You could also be against the death penalty and think it should not be used at all. Or, you could take a more nuanced position where you don’t think it should always be used but accept that there might be some cases where it is necessary.

Why the stance is important?

When writing an effective argumentative essay, it is crucial to choose a clear and focused stance. A well-defined position allows the writer to present their arguments in a comprehensive and structured manner which can help persuade readers to agree with the main points of the essay. When choosing a stance, it is important to consider all aspects of the issue and be open to consider both sides of the argument. Taking a nuanced position where you neither completely agree nor disagree with both sides can also be beneficial as it allows for an open discussion on different details of the topic.

In addition, having a focused stance also helps create higher semantic richness in your writing by allowing you to delve deeper into specific aspects of an issue. For example, when writing about the death penalty, one could focus on discussing its history or moral implications instead of just providing a general overview of its usage worldwide. This type of detailed analysis can provide more value and insight into an argument which can better inform readers about its importance and implications.

Overall, taking a clear stance on an issue is essential for producing an effective argumentative essay. By narrowing down your position and going into more depth about specific aspects of the topic at hand, you can ensure that your essay captures readers attention and presents your views in a compelling way.

Conducting research

It is important to do research before writing an essay. Research can help you understand the topic better and find evidence that supports your opinion. It is also important to consider the other side of the argument and think about what people who disagree with you might say. Doing research helps make sure that your essay is accurate and convincing.

Choosing the sources

When writing an argumentative essay, it is essential to have reliable sources of information that can support your point-of-view. Academic articles and books are great resources for gathering information as they are written by experts in the field and contain detailed facts and data about a particular subject. These types of sources offer more in-depth analysis which can help bolster any claims made in your essay.

In addition, news articles from reputable outlets or government reports can also be accessed when researching a topic. News articles provide up-to-date information on current events which can be useful for understanding the implications of certain policies or how a particular issue is being handled in society. Government reports can likewise be helpful as they often contain relevant statistics and research conducted by official bodies which allow for further exploration into a topic’s history and current state.

When using these sources it is important to make sure that the information you use is accurate and unbiased. Reading multiple sources from different perspectives will ensure that you are well informed before forming an opinion on a matter. Ultimately, having access to quality research materials can provide more value to your argument while helping readers better understand the importance of your point-of-view.

Developing an argument

When crafting an effective argumentative essay, it is essential to develop a strong and coherent argument that supports the chosen stance. A well-constructed argument will include relevant facts and data which can help persuade readers to agree with the main points of the essay. This can be accomplished by providing specific evidence for each claim made in the essay.

For example, if one is arguing for raising the minimum wage, they could use economic data to illustrate how increasing wages would benefit workers and reduce poverty levels. Incorporating this type of evidence into an argument can help strengthen its credibility as readers are presented with concrete facts which support why raising the minimum wage is important.

In addition to providing evidence, it is also important to consider counterarguments and address any potential weaknesses in one’s own position. Doing so allows writers to anticipate any objections readers may have and provide them with detailed explanations or alternative solutions that could overcome these objections. For instance, if someone were advocating for stricter gun laws, they could acknowledge potential drawbacks such as increased costs and then explain ways these costs could be offset by other benefits such as reduced crime rates and a greater sense of security among citizens.

Developing a strong and coherent argument that supports a chosen stance helps create higher semantic richness in an essay which can better inform readers about its importance and implications. With this type of persuasive writing, audiences will be able to better understand why certain issues should be taken seriously and what measures need to be taken in order to resolve them effectively.

Writing the essay

Writing an essay is a creative process that requires focus and dedication. While it can be challenging, taking the time to break down your ideas into manageable pieces will make the task easier. To write a successful essay, start with an engaging introduction that sets up your argument or main point of view. Then move on to developing body paragraphs that provide evidence and analysis in support of your thesis statement. Finally, end with a strong conclusion paragraph summarizing what you’ve already discussed and restating your argument for emphasis. With these tips in mind, you should have no problem crafting an effective and persuasive essay!

Why you should hire a professional argumentative writer?

Hiring a professional argumentative writer can give one’s essay that extra edge it needs to stand out and make an impact on readers. Professional writers are well-versed in the art of persuasive writing and have the expertise to craft effective arguments that help convince readers of their chosen stance.

Moreover, they can provide valuable advice and insights into how to structure an essay for maximum effect, as well as how to incorporate evidence and analysis into each point effectively. Furthermore, these writers will be able to proofread your work and make sure it is free from errors that could potentially undermine its overall quality. In short, hiring a professional argumentative writer can go a long way toward helping you create an engaging piece of writing which effectively conveys your message and leaves a lasting impression.

Ultimately, it is up to the individual to decide whether or not hiring a professional argumentative writer is worth their time and money. However, for those who are serious about making an impact with their writing, investing in the help of a qualified expert can be an invaluable asset that greatly enhances one’s chances of success.

Overall, effective argumentative writing requires careful thought and consideration in order to develop a strong and coherent argument that effectively communicates one’s chosen stance. By utilizing the tips mentioned above and considering the services of a professional argumentative writer, individuals will be able to confidently pursue their essay-writing goals and create persuasive pieces which successfully engage readers. With these strategies in place, writing a successful and compelling argumentative essay can be a breeze.

Example of Death Penalty Essay from Our Experts

Death Penalty

The death penalty is a type of punishment people receive for different crimes and illegal actions in the country. Capital punishment was widely used and accepted in the past punishing people and at the same time reducing the crime rates in society. However, the situation is different in the modern world, as the majority of countries abolished the death penalty completely, though a great number of countries still apply capital punishment for different types of crimes. Personally, I support the idea that the death penalty is wrong, though it may be applied under some circumstances.

The crime rate is rather high in different countries, but many nations find ways to avoid using the death penalty replacing it with life imprisonment or any other type of punishment. The rest of life spent in prison is also a terrible form of punishment for people, as they should live there alone with their thoughts and broken hopes. However, the death penalty might be applied for serial murders or rapes, especially of young children. Individuals who killed several individuals could give their life compensating the innocent souls and broken lives. 

Killing is morally wrong, and the death penalty is also wrong, but it may be the proper way to stop serial crimes in the community, as people may be afraid of such a terrible form of punishment. The death penalty is rather a controversial issue in the community, as it both may be considered a form of justice punishing people for criminal behavior, and legalized murder changes people’s attitudes toward the state’s decisions and choices. I do not consider the death penalty morally acceptable, but I would probably vote for it only for the most serious and serial crimes, as there should be a line people cannot cross.

Surely all people want to live, but if they take numerous lives of innocent children and adults, they should also die, as this at least helps parents, relatives, and friends of the dead persons to feel some kind of relief that the murderer is also dead. Gottfried (2002) stated that “life imprisonment too often does not remove the danger of murderers killing again” (p. 39). In fact, criminals may show violence and try to kill their guards or fellow prisoners doing much harm even in prison. That is why the death penalty may not only punish the criminal fairly but also escape future possible problems and concerns.

People have no authority to decide who should live and who should die, but there should be special circumstances for the application of the death penalty. Death penalty surely imposes a threat on the community helping to reduce the crime rate in the community and stabilize people’s life inspiring much confidence and security on their part. Guernsey (2009) stated that “when criminals knew they would not be executed for their crimes, they committed many more murders” (p. 57). The application of the death penalty will help to shape people’s minds and future behaviors.

The death penalty was a form of a message to other criminals forcing them to feel the threat from the government and the power of law. Murder and rape rates might drop significantly through the application of the death penalty for serial murders and rapes, and the role of the government is rather high in this field evaluating the reasons for and against this type of punishment. Modern society is surely more civilized, and the death penalty may be considered an issue from the past, but if this is the only way to stop crimes and save the lives of innocent persons, the government and criminal justice should apply this punishment to promote happier lives in the community.

Due to the fact that the debate concerning the use of the death penalty will continue for a long period of time, there are always persons supporting and opposing certain decisions and choices, as well as the death penalty. The application of the death penalty should be properly evaluated and analyzed in the country helping people to make proper choices and decisions in their life. Each person has the moral right to live, and the death penalty violates people’s rights and freedoms in this connection affecting the whole system of moral and ethical laws and issues. 

Besides, the application of the death penalty toward representatives of certain cultural or ethnic groups may bring the additional problem of discrimination. Stearman (2007) stated that “the lack of objective, measurable standards ensures that the application of the death penalty will be discriminatory against racial, gender, and ethnic groups” (p. 5). People should simply understand these issues properly escaping additional challenges and troubles causing numerous conflicts and debates in the community. The death penalty is not surely a way out to the criminal situation in the country, but it helps to threaten the criminal community reducing the rate of serious crimes.

Many people living worldwide consider the death penalty a cruel way of treating people, and no one thinks about the idea that criminals are cruel themselves and deserve the same kind of treatment in the community. Every crime should be punished, and the type of punishment should depend on the nature and cruelty of the crime, as the death penalty is not applicable for thefts or larceny. Modern individuals should feel the difference, and the proper understanding and evaluation of the problem will help to shape their opinions and ideas concerning capital punishment properly.

People do not have such strict opposition to life imprisonment, though this is also cruel to let the person spend the rest of his/her life in prison and die there. The majority of European countries abolished the death penalty completely and for all kinds of offenses, but there are still people living in those countries who reject this abolition. Criminals fear nothing in the legal setting in such countries and can kill and rape freely simply by spending some time in prison. Bedau & Cassell (2005) stated that in Britain, “about two-thirds to three-quarters of the public support the death penalty” (p. 200). 

Individuals are different, as well as people’s ideas and opinions on the death penalty, but there should be a legally-acceptable course of its application to specific crimes. According to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, there are certain provisions concerning the application of the death penalty used only for the most serious crimes. Schabas (1996) stated that the death penalty should be excluded “in the case of crimes committed by persons under the age of eighteen and for pregnant women” (p. 30). 

Criminals are also people who can make occasional mistakes and behave improperly, and this is the major reason to consider each case individually evaluating the evidence and the nature of the crime in order to choose the proper punishment correctly. However, serial crimes are not made by mistake, as people cruelly kill several individuals and should be punished properly for such acts, and the death penalty is the proper punishment for such criminals. The death penalty may help to reduce the crime rates in the community securing people and inspiring stability and safety on the part of the population.  

You might also like:

• Interesting Descriptive Essay Topics
• A Comprehensive List Of 364 Debate Topics For College Students
• 400+ Powerful Philosophy Topics

Place your order — make the first step to your hassle-free life!

Resume title

• Entertainment
• Environment
• Information Science and Technology
• Social Issues

Home Essay Samples Social Issues

Essay Samples on Death Penalty

The death penalty is a legal process where a convicted individual is sentenced to death as punishment for a severe crime, typically involving murder. It has been a topic of extensive discourse for years, igniting passionate arguments from proponents and opponents alike. Death penalty essay examples provide a platform to examine the complex moral, ethical, social, and legal aspects associated with this form of punishment.

Writing an Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty

• Analyze pros and cons

One of the primary arguments in favor of the death penalty is that it serves as a deterrent to potential criminals. Supporters argue that the fear of facing the ultimate punishment acts as a deterrent, potentially reducing the occurrence of heinous crimes. On the other hand, opponents of the death penalty question its effectiveness as a deterrent and highlight the potential for wrongful convictions and the irreversibility of taking a life.

• Exlore the question of morality

Another crucial aspect to explore in your argumentative essay about death penalty is the question of morality. By delving into philosophical frameworks, religious perspectives, and cultural variations, you can deepen your understanding of the moral implications associated with the death penalty.

• Discuss legal dimensions

In addition to morality, the death penalty has significant legal dimensions. Analyzing the legal framework surrounding capital punishment, including constitutional considerations, international perspectives, and evolving jurisprudence, can provide valuable insights into the complexities of implementing and challenging the death penalty.

When crafting your death penalty argumentative essay, ensure that you provide a balanced view by considering both sides of the argument. Acknowledge the counterarguments put forth by proponents and opponents, addressing them with clarity and intellectual rigor. This approach demonstrates your ability to engage with opposing viewpoints and strengthens the overall credibility of your death penalty essays.

Examining the Arguments: Why the Death Penalty is Good

Introduction The subject of the death penalty is a highly controversial one. While some argue vehemently against it, others see it as a necessary component of a just legal system. This essay aims to outline the arguments posited by those who assert why the death...

• Death Penalty

Exploring Pros of Death Penalty: Comprehensive Argument Examination

The topic of capital punishment has been a subject of intense debate for many years, with opinions sharply divided between proponents and opponents of the practice. This pros of death penalty essay aims to explore and present the arguments in favor of the use of...

Exploring Arguments in Favor of the Death Penalty

The death penalty, a controversial practice, has sparked enduring debates regarding its merits and drawbacks. This essay delves into the arguments in favor of the death penalty, examining its potential deterrent effect, retribution, and the protection it offers to society. The Deterrent Effect: Preventing Heinous...

Why People Support the Death Penalty: A Rational Perspective

Introduction The death penalty has been a contentious issue, stirring intense debate in societies around the world. Advocates for capital punishment argue that it serves essential functions in a justice system. This essay will outline various reasons why people support the death penalty, examining the...

Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished: Comprehensive Perspective

The debate surrounding the death penalty has raged on for decades, with strong arguments on both sides. This essay presents a comprehensive perspective against the abolition of the death penalty, exploring its role in the criminal justice system, deterrence of crime, closure for victims' families,...

Stressed out with your paper?

Consider using writing assistance:

• 100% unique papers
• 3 hrs deadline option

Exploring Anti-Death Penalty Sentiments: Reevaluating Capital Punishment

The death penalty, a contentious practice in many legal systems, has spurred ongoing debates about its morality, efficacy, and ethical implications. This essay delves into the heart of anti-death penalty sentiments, elucidating the reasons behind the opposition, examining the ethical concerns against the death penalty,...

• Capital Punishment

Death Penalty: Agree or Disagree. Perspectives on Capital Punishment

The subject of the death penalty is one of the most contentious issues in modern society, eliciting strong opinions from individuals who fall on both sides of the debate. This "death penalty agree or disagree essay" aims to explore the arguments for and against capital...

Examining the Death Penalty: An Argumentative Perspective

The death penalty, a highly controversial topic, has ignited passionate debates across societies worldwide. This short argumentative essay seeks to dissect the key arguments for and against the death penalty, exploring its potential deterrence effect, ethical implications, and the complexities of implementing such a grave...

Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished: A Comprehensive Argument

The debate over the death penalty has persisted for centuries, with proponents and opponents offering a range of perspectives. This essay presents a comprehensive argument for the abolition of the death penalty, examining ethical, practical, and societal considerations that support the movement to eliminate state-sanctioned...

Assessing Death Penalty Effectiveness: An Argumentative Analysis

The effectiveness of the death penalty has long been a topic of contentious debate, raising critical questions about its deterrent impact, potential for error, and ethical implications. This essay delves into the multifaceted argument surrounding the question of whether the death penalty can truly be...

Death Sentence Should Be Activated: A Worldwide Argument

The question of whether the death sentence should be activated in every country around the world is a deeply divisive and morally charged issue. This essay will present arguments both for and against the universal activation of the death sentence, weighing the ethical, practical, and...

Death Penalty Summary: An Overview of Capital Punishment

Introduction In societies across the world, the death penalty remains one of the most polarizing issues, sparking intense debates around morality, justice, and human rights. This death penalty summary essay aims to provide an objective and comprehensive overview of capital punishment, exploring its history, the...

Against the Death Penalty: A Human Rights Perspective

Introduction The death penalty, or capital punishment, has been a topic of contention for centuries. It involves the judicial killing of a person as punishment for a crime they have been convicted of, typically murder. The argument against the death penalty is multifaceted, encompassing ethical,...

• Human Rights

Weighing the Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty

The death penalty has long been a subject of intense debate, evoking impassioned arguments from both proponents and opponents. This essay delves into the pros and cons of the death penalty, highlighting the potential benefits of its implementation and addressing the ethical and practical concerns...

Reasons Why Death Penalty Should Not Be Allowed

Introduction The topic of capital punishment is a deeply polarizing issue that stirs passionate debates in societies globally. This reasons why death penalty should not be allowed essay outlines the arguments against the use of capital punishment, focusing on its infringement on human rights, moral...

Death Penalty Discussion: Examination of Capital Punishment

Introduction The debate surrounding the death penalty is as ancient as the practice itself. This death penalty discussion essay will dive deep into the heart of the matter, unpacking the historical, moral, and legal nuances of capital punishment. It will draw upon diverse arguments and...

Religion and the Death Penalty: A Complex Intersection

Introduction The death penalty, as one of the most contentious issues, intersects significantly with various world religions, each of which has its own perspective on capital punishment. This religion and the death penalty essay aims to explore the complex relationship between various religious beliefs and...

• Comparative Analysis

Life Imprisonment vs Death Penalty: A Comparative Analysis

Introduction In societies around the world, two primary forms of punishment are designated for the most severe crimes: life imprisonment and the death penalty. This life imprisonment vs death penalty essay seeks to scrutinize these two forms of punishment, considering their effectiveness, moral implications, costs,...

The Death Sentence Debate: Balancing Justice, Ethics, and Humanity

The death sentence, also known as capital punishment, has long been a contentious topic, sparking impassioned debates worldwide. This essay delves into the multifaceted arguments surrounding the death sentence, examining its place within the criminal justice system, ethical considerations, and the broader implications for society....

Is the Death Penalty Ethical: Examining Capital Punishment Morality

Introduction The implementation of the death penalty, or capital punishment, sparks a moral dilemma that has persisted through centuries. In a world where the preservation of human life is a foundational principle in most societies, the ethical implications of the state executing individuals as punishment...

The Morality and Ethics of the Death Penalty

As societies around the world grapple with the concept of justice, the argument about death as a form of punishment remains at the forefront of ethical and legal debates. Despite its declining use in many Western countries, the death penalty continues to be a topic...

Respect for Life: the Issue of Death Penalty in Catholic Teachings

An essential principle of a human rights is that each and every human being has an innate dignity that must be respected. Respect for one's human dignity is the original human right from which other human being had as a gift from our almighty God....

• Catholic Church

The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished: An Unfair Treatment of Convicts

Martin Luther King once said, “Returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars,”(King and Harding, 2010). Essentially, his philosophy was that violence is not the answer and there can always be different methods to get around it....

Death Penalty Should Be Abolished: The Inhumane Practice

As it may seem, multiple deaths have occurred with the approval of the government. Where a person (the defendant) has ignored the law and committed a crime so barbarous that the only option left is to eliminate the person and decide what form of execution...

The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished or It Deters Crime

In the news, this month is the story of Charles Russell Rhines, who could become the first man in the history of the United States to petition the South Dakota state to use a lethal injection drug of his choice. Rhines filed a petition asking...

Death Penalty Should Be Abolished: Death in the Hands of a Human

The death penalty. The supreme punishment. The act of punishing injustice by the means of injustice. First introduced as capital punishment in the eighteenth century, but used since the beginning of time, it is safe to say the death penalty holds a key role in...

Death Penalty: Pros and Cons of Ethics Behind Capital Punishment

Is death penalty ethical? Death Penalty is ethical because it follows Hammurabi’s code which says An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. Death Penalty has been used for hundreds of years and over the years it has only got less extreme....

Death Penalty and Racial Prejudice: Pros and Cons of the Method

In 2019 alone, twenty two men have been brutally murdered in seven states in America (DPIC). For every person a special group had gathered to debated upon whether or not these men and women were worthy of a life or if they could be sacrificed...

Death Penalty As a Cruel and Unusual Punishment

George Walker Bush, a former U.S. president, and governor of Texas, once spoke, “I don’t think you should support the death penalty to seek revenge. I don’t think that’s right. I think the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves other people’s...

• American Government

Death Penalty: The Issue of Cruel and Unusual Punishments

You are sitting in a chair, waiting, about to be executed. You’re innocent, but that doesn’t matter now. You’re injected with a needle, which has a dangerous mixture of illegal drugs. You feel like fire is shooting through your veins, but you’re unable to speak...

Death Penalty: The Cruelty of American Penal System

Imagine your loved ones or yourself going through capital punishment.. being sentenced to death creating fear in an individual's mind. It is said by Roger Hood, “Capital punishment is also known as the death penalty execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by...

• Individual Rights

Death Penalty Should not Be Abolished

Given the global tragedies and massacres which have occurred in today’s society, where do you stand on the death penalty? This option is still accessible in 31 out of 50 states. For more than 50 years no one in the united states has been executed...

Why The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

In 2018, twenty five American prisoners were sentenced to death. Is this morally wrong? Is this humane? Is this justice? These are only a few of the questions that may be posed when deliberating the death penalty. There are many shocking and unjustified arguments for...

• Prison System

Beliefs and Thoughts Over the Death Penalty

There are a lot of mixed opinions surrounding the idea of the death penalty. In the 1990’s, nearly 80% of the public approved Capital Punishment, while about 5% of were undecided and the other 15% opposed it. Is it fair to those who have done...

The Death Penalty As An Effective Way To Deter Crime

The essence of death penalty to reduce crime is that people know that they will be executed in the future if they commit a crime and this threat is sufficient enough to cause a significant number of people to give up their thoughts to crime.(Death...

Questioning Whether Death Penalty Can Be Effective

The Declaration of Rights Article 7 states that all are equal before the law and are entitled to no discrimination and equal protection of the law. Additionally, Article 8 states that everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for...

Abolish The Death Penalty: Not An Effective Way To Deter Crime

Some people whose lives get taken deserve to live another day, but how does the feeling of revenge give one the right to take the life of another? People should “emphasize mercy rather than revenge” (Bowman). Just because someone made a mistake does not mean...

The Death Penalty And Whether It Can Be Effective Against Crime

Why is the death penalty such a controversial issue? Why is the issue one that can be argued and have many different opinions on the issue? Is the death penalty fair? The death penalty by definition, is the legal authorization to kill an individual as...

The Benefits Of Death Penalty Over Life Imprisonment

Do you think that we should have the death penalty? Should we punish some of the criminals for murder? Why should they not get punished to death if they murdered innocent people? THEY SHOULD!! Family’s could get put to ease. We reserve the right in...

Life Imprisonment Vs Death Penalty: The Best Type Of Crime Prevention

Punishment for those who commit major wrongdoings like kill and such may be life imprisonment or the death penalty. Violations are getting to be increasingly uncontrolled in our nation. A part of detainees is being sent to imprison each day. Although criminals are a danger...

The Literary Analysis of Media on Death Penalty and Abolitionism

This article defines that neither objection is a sufficient reason to ignore or dismiss the incapacitation rationale. A closer analysis of the proposed non lethal alternatives reveals that solitary confinement entails extraordinary cruelty and psychological damage, while life imprisonment without parole, though it may reduce...

• Abolitionism

Arguments Regarding The Morality of Death Penalty

The death penalty, also known as execution or capital punishment, is the sentence of death imposed by courts as punishment for a crime. People who receive the death penalty typically are convicted of murder and similar crimes like aggravated murder or a felony murder. State...

• Criminal Justice

Why Death Penalty Must Be Left in Past

As society progresses through time, we like to think that we’ve left behind the ignorance of our forefathers. However, the continued use and acceptance of the death penalty within the American justice and penal system proves that in the 243 years since the Declaration of...

An Evaluation of the Impacts of Reintroducing the Death Penalty in the UK

Introduction Capital punishment was used in the United Kingdom until 1965. The final executions in the United Kingdom were by hanging, and took place in 1964, prior to capital punishment being abolished for murder shortly after. This was replaced by the murder act in 1965,...

The Metaphorical Pit of Hopelessness in The Pit and The Pendulum

In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Pit and the Pendulum” we go into the mind of someone who is given the death penalty and is stuck in a dungeon. In the story, Poe creates suspense and a theme of death with the dark dungeon. The “Pit...

• The Pit and The Pendulum

The Arguments of Supporters and Opposers of Death Penalty

The death penalty is a widley discussed topic around the world, most comonly in America. While there are many supporters of such act there is also a large amount of opposition. As of may 30th there are 29 states in which the death penalty is...

Execution of Criminals as the Method to Disciplinary Actions of Clients

The ultimate punishment: implementation of death penalty.

The debate around the death penalty is an ongoing issue around the world. The criminal is persecuted for their crimes by the state through the act of execution. Over the years, some people have been against this and called it unconstitutional while some support it....

Pros and Cons of Insanity Defense, Death Penalty and The History of Cybercrime Prosecution

What is the history of the insanity defense? The insanity defense can be dated back to around the 16th century. This defense was expanded upon by British Courts in order to devise the ‘wild beast’ test. This test disallowed a defendant from being held responsible...

• Cyber Crimes
• Insanity Defense

Death Penalty as A Tool of Injustice

Do you remember those times in grade school when you had to sit out at recess because your teacher thought you did something you were innocent of? That was brutal punishment as a kid. You felt so angry because you missed the chance of playing...

Death Penalty In The American Society

Across many nations in the world there was either a death penalty or at least had one at a time. The death penalty was used to punish people who broke the law. If we look at places who have the death penalty, such as Iran...

Death Penalty Throughout The History of United States

In the early United States colonial era when Great Britain still ruled the colonies, executions were common and used as a deterrent to prevent people from committing crimes against the crown. After the Declaration of Independence was signed, Benjamin Franklin said that the death penalty...

• American History

Death Penalty Eliminates Criminals, Not Crime

A question might arises that what is more important for us whether to cure the root cause of the disease or whether to finish(kill) the carrier i. e. patient itself who is suffering from that disease. Of course, we need to cure the root cause...

• Criminals in Society

Why Death Sentence Should Be Activated In Every Country

Legal punishments date back to the times of ancient civilizations who implemented these as a mechanism to regulate the illicit behavior of one of its individuals. Ever since its early stages of implementation, the death penalty has been a sanction that has sparked a polarized...

Best topics on Death Penalty

1. Examining the Arguments: Why the Death Penalty is Good

2. Exploring Pros of Death Penalty: Comprehensive Argument Examination

3. Exploring Arguments in Favor of the Death Penalty

4. Why People Support the Death Penalty: A Rational Perspective

5. Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished: Comprehensive Perspective

6. Exploring Anti-Death Penalty Sentiments: Reevaluating Capital Punishment

7. Death Penalty: Agree or Disagree. Perspectives on Capital Punishment

8. Examining the Death Penalty: An Argumentative Perspective

9. Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished: A Comprehensive Argument

10. Assessing Death Penalty Effectiveness: An Argumentative Analysis

11. Death Sentence Should Be Activated: A Worldwide Argument

12. Death Penalty Summary: An Overview of Capital Punishment

13. Against the Death Penalty: A Human Rights Perspective

14. Weighing the Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty

15. Reasons Why Death Penalty Should Not Be Allowed

• Discrimination
• Globalization
• Black Lives Matter
• Gender Equality
• Anti Slavery Movement
• Affirmative Action

Need writing help?

You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need

*No hidden charges

100% Unique Essays

Absolutely Confidential

Money Back Guarantee

By clicking “Send Essay”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails

You can also get a UNIQUE essay on this or any other topic

Thank you! We’ll contact you as soon as possible.

Persuasive Essay Writing

Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty

Craft an Effective Argument: Examples of Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty

Published on: Jan 27, 2023

Last updated on: Jan 29, 2024

People also read

How to Write a Persuasive Essay: A Step-by-Step Guide

Easy and Unique Persuasive Essay Topics with Tips

The Basics of Crafting an Outstanding Persuasive Essay Outline

Ace Your Next Essay With These Persuasive Essay Examples!

Persuasive Essay About Gun Control - Best Examples for Students

Top Examples of Persuasive Essay about Covid-19

Learn How To Write An Impressive Persuasive Essay About Business

Learn How to Craft a Compelling Persuasive Essay About Abortion With Examples!

Make Your Point: Tips and Examples for Writing a Persuasive Essay About Online Education

Learn How To Craft a Powerful Persuasive Essay About Bullying

Craft an Engaging Persuasive Essay About Smoking: Examples & Tips

Learn How to Write a Persuasive Essay About Social Media With Examples

Share this article

No matter what topic we're discussing, there is usually a range of opinions and viewpoints on the issues. 

But when it comes to more serious matters like the death penalty, creating an effective argument can become tricky. 

Although this topic may be difficult to tackle, you can still write an engaging persuasive essay to convey your point.

In this blog post, we'll explore how you can use examples of persuasive essays on death penalty topics.

So put your rhetorical skills to the test, and let’s dive right into sample essays and tips. 

On This Page On This Page -->

What Do We Mean by a Persuasive Essay?

A persuasive essay is a type of writing that attempts to persuade the reader or audience.

This essay usually presents an argument supported by evidence and examples. The main aim is to convince the reader or audience to take action or accept a certain viewpoint. 

Persuasive essays may be written from a neutral or biased perspective and contain personal opinions.

To do this, you must provide clear reasoning and evidence to support your argument. Persuasive essays can take many forms, including speeches, letters, articles, and opinion pieces. 

It is important to consider the audience when writing a persuasive essay. The language used should be tailored to their understanding of the topic. 

Read our comprehensive guide on persuasive essays to know all about crafting excellent essays.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!

Let's move on to some examples so that you can better understand this topic.

Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty Examples

Are you feeling stuck with the task of writing a persuasive essay about the death penalty? 

Looking for some examples to get your ideas flowing? 

You’re in luck — we’ve got just the thing! Take a look at these free downloadable examples.

Example of a Persuasive essay about death penalty

Persuasive essay about death penalty in the Philippines

Short Persuasive essay about death penalty

Persuasive essay about death penalty should be abolished

The death penalty pros and cons essay

Looking for some more examples on persuasive essays? Check out our blog about persuasive essay examples !

Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty Examples 

We have compiled some of the best examples to help you start crafting your essay.

These examples will provide dynamic perspectives and insights from real-world legal cases to personal essays. 

Have a look at them to get inspired!!

Argumentative essay about death penalty in the Philippines

Argumentative essay about death penalty with introduction body conclusion

Argumentative essay about death penalty should be abolished

Argumentative essay about death penalty conclusion

6 Tips To Write an A+ Persuasive Essay

We know it can be daunting to compose a perfect essay that effectively conveys your point of view to your readers. Worry no more. 

Simply follow these 6 tips, and you will be on your way to a perfect persuasive essay.

1. Understand the assignment and audience

 Before you start writing your essay, you must understand what type of essay you are being asked to write. Who your target audience should be?

Make sure you know exactly what you’re arguing for and against, as this will help shape your essay's content.

2. Brainstorm and research

Once you understand the topic better, brainstorm ideas that support your argument.

During this process, be sure to do additional research on any unfamiliar points or topics.

3. Create an outline

After doing your initial research, create an outline for your essay that includes all the main points you want to make. 

This will help keep your thoughts organized and ensure you cover all the necessary points cohesively.

Check out our extensive guide on persuasive essay outlines to master the art of creating essays.

4. Make an argument

Use persuasive language and techniques to construct your essay. Strong evidence, such as facts and statistics, can also help to strengthen your argument.

5. Edit and revise 

Before you submit your essay, take the time to edit and revise it carefully. 

This will ensure that your argument is clear and concise and that there are no grammar or spelling errors.

6. Get feedback

Lastly, consider asking someone else to read over your essay before you submit it.

Feedback from another person can help you see any weaknesses in your argument or areas that need improvement. 

Summing up, 

Writing a persuasive essay about the death penalty doesn’t have to be overwhelming. With these examples and tips, you can be sure to write an essay that will impress your teacher.

Whether it’s an essay about the death penalty or any other controversial topic, you can ace it with these steps! 

Remember, the key is to be creative and organized in your writing!

Don't have time to write your essay? 

Don't stress! Leave it to us! Our persuasive essay writing service is here to help! 

Contact the team of experts at our essay writing service. We can help you write a creative, well-organized, and engaging essay for the reader. 

Our persuasive essay writer will write the best essay for you at affordable rates! Moreover, we provide free revisions and other exclusive perks!

So don't delay! Ask us to write an essay for me today!

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most persuasive argument for the death penalty.

The most persuasive argument for the death penalty is that it is a deterrent to violent crime. 

The idea is that by punishing criminals, other potential criminals will be less likely to act out of fear of similar punishment.

How do you start a persuasive speech on the death penalty?

When starting a persuasive speech on the death penalty, begin by introducing and defining the topic. Provide an overview of the controversial issue. 

Outline your points and arguments clearly, including evidence to support your position. 

What are good topics for persuasive essays?

Good topics for persuasive essays include 

• Whether or not the death penalty is a fair punishment for violent crime
• Whether harsher punishments will reduce crime rates
• Will capital punishment is worth the costs associated with it
• How rehabilitation should be taken into consideration when dealing with criminals.

Cathy A. (Marketing, Literature)

For more than five years now, Cathy has been one of our most hardworking authors on the platform. With a Masters degree in mass communication, she knows the ins and outs of professional writing. Clients often leave her glowing reviews for being an amazing writer who takes her work very seriously.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Keep reading

Legal & Policies

• Privacy Policy
• Cookies Policy
• Terms of Use
• Refunds & Cancellations
• Our Writers
• Success Stories
• Our Guarantees
• Affiliate Program
• Referral Program
• AI Essay Writer

Disclaimer: All client orders are completed by our team of highly qualified human writers. The essays and papers provided by us are not to be used for submission but rather as learning models only.

Finding Sources for Death Penalty Research

Barry Winiker/photolibrary/Getty Images

• Writing Research Papers
• Writing Essays
• English Grammar
• M.Ed., Education Administration, University of Georgia
• B.A., History, Armstrong State University

One of the most popular topics for an argument essay is the death penalty . When researching a topic for an argumentative essay , accuracy is important, which means the quality of your sources is important.

If you're writing a paper about the death penalty, you can start with this list of sources, which provide arguments for all sides of the topic.

Amnesty International Site

Amnesty International views the death penalty as "the ultimate, irreversible denial of human rights." This website provides a gold mine of statistics and the latest breaking news on the subject.

Mental Illness on Death Row

Death Penalty Focus is an organization that aims to bring about the abolition of capital punishment and is a great resource for information. You will find evidence that many of the people executed over the past decades are affected by a form of mental illness or disability.

Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty

This extensive article provides an overview of arguments for and against the death penalty and offers a history of notable events that have shaped the discourse for activists and proponents.

Pro-Death Penalty Links

This page comes from ProDeathPenalty and contains a state-by-state guide to capital punishment resources. You'll also find a list of papers written by students on topics related to capital punishment. 

• Ethos, Logos, Pathos for Persuasion
• 5 Steps to Writing a Position Paper
• Unreliable Sources for Your Research Project
• Writing an Annotated Bibliography for a Paper
• Research Note Cards
• How to Develop a Research Paper Timeline
• Finding Trustworthy Sources
• How to Write a 10-Page Research Paper
• When to Cite a Source in a Paper
• How to Narrow the Research Topic for Your Paper
• How to Find Trustworthy Sources
• What Is a Senior Thesis?
• Research Paper Writing Checklist
• What Is a Bibliography?
• How to Use Verbs Effectively in Your Research Paper
• How to Write a Solid Thesis Statement

Argumentative Essay: The Death Penalty In The United States

In the United States today, 1,446 people have been put to death. The death penalty is a cruel punishment of execution, that ends someone's life for a crime. The majority of death penalty cases include the execution of murderers but can be applied for treason, espionage, and various other crimes. Lethal injection is wrongly used to put an end to human life. Within the years, people have passed a painful, cruel death. How would you feel if someone you loved was sentenced to death? Not only is the death penalty brutal, but it also isn't fair in regards to gender, race, and economics. The death penalty should not be allowed. Firstly, according to studies, gender has a role in the total say. Women are not sentenced to death nearly as …show more content…

It's been shown that jurors in Washington are three times more likely to sentence a black defendant to the death penalty than a white defendant in a comparable case. As of October 2002, 12 people have been executed where the defendant was white and the murder victim black. Compared that with 178 black defendants executed for murders with white victims. Studies show that in Louisiana, the odds of the death penalty are 97% higher for those whose victim was white than for those whose victim was black. As if that is not enough, a study in North Carolina has proven that the likeliness of receiving the death penalty rose by three and a half times for those defendants whose victims were white. People argue that the Civil War and the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments have ended racism throughout the United States, however racism is something dealt with everyday, in schools, on the streets, and even in this serious …show more content…

Death penalty is more expensive, because it involves more lawyers, experts, and time. The defense cost of the death penalty is four times the cost of a normal punishment. Back in 2011, U.S. 9th Circuit Court Judge Arthur L. Alarcón and Attorney Paula Mitchell published a massive study arguing that the death penalty had cost Californians 4 billion dollars since 1978. They found that jury selection could take as much as a month longer in death penalty trials and cost roughly $200,000 more than in other murder trials. As support for the death penalty declines, Mitchell said, it takes longer — more paid hours on the part of attorneys, the judge, and court staff — to find twelve jurors who are willing to impose the punishment. In Maryland, the cost of the death penalty is three million dollars- the eventual cost for tax payers for cases throughout 1978 and 1979 rose to $186 million. In Texas, the average cost of the death penalty is around 2.3 million dollars, which is three times the cost for a single cell in the presence of the highest security for forty years. Even though the death penalty could prevent future tragedy, its cost hurts our nation far

More about Argumentative Essay: The Death Penalty In The United States

ESSAY SAUCE

FOR STUDENTS : ALL THE INGREDIENTS OF A GOOD ESSAY

Essay: Should The Death Penalty Be Abolished?

Essay details and download:.

• Subject area(s): Law essays
• Reading time: 4 minutes
• Price: Free download
• Published: 16 June 2012*
• Last Modified: 16 March 2022
• File format: Text
• Words: 1,079 (approx)
• Number of pages: 5 (approx)
• Tags: Death penalty essays

Text preview of this essay:

This page of the essay has 1,079 words. Download the full version above.

Should The Death Penalty Be Abolished?

History of Death Penalty The first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes. The death penalty was also part of the Fourteenth Century B.C.’s Hittite Code; in the Seventh Century B.C.’s Draconian Code of Athens, which made death the only punishment for all crimes; and in the Fifth Century B.C.’s Roman law of the Twelve Tablets.

Death sentences were carried out by such means as crucifixion, drowning, beating to death, burning alive, and impalement. In the Tenth Century A.D., hanging became the usual method of execution in Britain. This report will give argument against death penalty while supporting the abolishment movements of death penalty, David (2010)

Should the death penalty be abolished? Death penalty is a severe and irreversible punishment that raises controversy around the world. In order to discuss the valuable existence of the death penalty, it is might make sense to bring two questions must; whether there is strong reason to implement the death penalty; and whether the death penalty is a suitable method to solve the problem. There are many arguments for and against the death penalty, Sanger and Unah (2012).

First and foremost, death sentence does not make sense it is more of barbaric to deal with murder morally nothing make us better when we kill those who kill. It insincere. Also it is an easy way out for the criminals. It would rather have then suffer in jail for the rest of their life without parole. More so, murders do not fear death so this kind of penalty is not a restrictive. In fact it is cheaper to keep an inmate in prison for life without parole than it is to kill. It does not make sense to spend millions of money on a morally questionable act that has shown no signs of determent, Martin and Michael (2013)

Secondly, death penalty should be abolished. Every year, thousands of people are put on death row for a crime they didn’t even commit. There’s no way of knowing if they actually did or not. Is it worth the risk? It can be seen as a cruel and unusual punishment, which goes against one of our amendments in the Constitution. Crime will always be a part of the world and there will be better ways to handle it. In the United States only it is estimated that total prosecution and defense costs to the state and counties equal $9 million per year. (Gross, Samuel, 2006)

Death penalty is a human rights violation. With the death penalty, you are deliberately deciding punishment by death for a criminal. This is the same concept as eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth. It violates human rights by the government forcing the death of a human. Death by capital punishment is not justice meaning not giving them what is rightfully theirs. I fully support imprisonment instead. God says that we shall not decide the length of another human’s life according to the 10 Commandments. In conclusion, the death penalty is killing. (Stephen and Bright, 2010)

Furthermore, it is barbaric, over expensive and innocents often die If you trade an eye for an eye the whole world will be blind – literally, what gives the justice system the right to take the priceless human life? Thousands of people in the world history have been acquitted after death. The death sentence is incredibly expensive and a waste of information on killers and how they operate as well. Advocates of the death sentence seem to tend to appeal to the emotions but at the end of the day this biblical type of revenge that seems so popular is never satisfying, it is just another death among thousands. Poor quality defense leaves many to death sentence, a study at Columbia University found that 68% of all death penalty cases were reversed on appeal, with inadequate defense as one of the main reasons requiring reversal.

Moreover, it is cruel and unusual punishment. We cannot justify killing someone if we are punctuating it by saying killing is wrong. From a young age we teach our children that two wrongs do not make a right, yet the death penalty is trying to do exactly that. Costs are also prohibitive. It costs more to have someone go through the death penalty process than to keep him in jail for the rest of his life. For there is a better way to help the families of murder victims, families of murder victims undergo severe trauma and loss which no one should minimize. However, executions do not help these people heal nor do they end their pain; the extended process prior to executions prolongs the agony of the family. Families of murder victims would benefit far more if the funds now being used for the costly process of executions were diverted to counseling and other assistance. (Baldus, David. 2008)

Mentally ill people are executed, one out of every ten who has been executed in the United States since 1977 is mentally ill, according to Amnesty International and the National Association on Mental Illness. Many mentally ill defendants are unable to participate in their trials in any meaningful way and appear unengaged, cold, and unfeeling before the jury. Some have been forcibly medicated in order to make them competent to be executed. Although the U.S. Supreme Court has decreed that people with ‘mental retardation’ may not be executed, many countries has not yet passed a law banning the execution of the mentally ill.

Suppose death sentence should only really be used for crimes such as 9/11 and people like Bin Laden or the Yorkshire Ripper. But otherwise it should not be brought back and it should be banned in the world for an indefinite time. Police should use guns if needed, if they were dealing with a gun crime. Or in other words, suppose that we should get rid of them altogether. (Martin and Michael, 2009)

Lastly basing with biblical facts, the Bible does not allow people to be killed when we read through the Bible, killing people is a sin. In Old Testament times, it is mentioned that anyone who commits adultery should be stoned to death, as religious societies we disagree with death sentence. We have witnessed so many people have been killed wrongly. The real criminal is not killed though.

...(download the rest of the essay above)

Discover more:

• Death penalty essays

Recommended for you

• Death penalty perspectives – deterrence and morality
• Is There a Better Alternative to Capital Punishment?
• The concept of life in The Green Mile

About this essay:

If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

Essay Sauce, Should The Death Penalty Be Abolished? . Available from:<https://www.essaysauce.com/law-essays/should-death-penalty-abolished/> [Accessed 03-08-24].

These Law essays have been submitted to us by students in order to help you with your studies.

* This essay may have been previously published on Essay.uk.com at an earlier date.

Essay Categories:

• Accounting essays
• Architecture essays
• Business essays
• Computer science essays
• Criminology essays
• Economics essays
• Education essays
• Engineering essays
• English language essays
• Environmental studies essays
• Essay examples
• Finance essays
• Geography essays
• Health essays
• History essays
• Hospitality and tourism essays
• Human rights essays
• Information technology essays
• International relations
• Leadership essays
• Linguistics essays
• Literature essays
• Management essays
• Marketing essays
• Mathematics essays
• Media essays
• Medicine essays
• Military essays
• Miscellaneous essays
• Music Essays
• Nursing essays
• Philosophy essays
• Photography and arts essays
• Politics essays
• Project management essays
• Psychology essays
• Religious studies and theology essays
• Sample essays
• Science essays
• Social work essays
• Sociology essays
• Sports essays
• Types of essay
• Zoology essays

Writing Ideas

• Beginning a compare&contrast paper
• Strong persuasive paper topics
• Response to literature essay samples
• Finding an essay topic on Israel

A List Of Original Argumentative Essay Topics On The Death Penalty

Few issues in the United States are more contentious than the use of the death penalty as a punishment for severe crimes. Capital punishment has been recorded almost since the dawn of written history, but in today’s world, many people have come to see it as unnecessary and inhumane. Although some people are opposed to taking the lives of criminals, other people argue that it’s the best way to deal with serious crimes. They feel that these people have committed such terrible atrocities that they can never realistically be rehabilitated and reintroduced into society. The debate has been ongoing for a long time, with both sides expressing strong opinions.

Because the death penalty is so contentious, it’s a great subject for an argumentative essay. This type of essay revolves around the presentation of a particular stance on an issue, which you need to defend with logic, facts, and sound reasoning. You’ll need to do some research to gather relevant facts that support your point of view, then tie them together in a cohesive paper that presents a lucid argument based on the evidence. Because argumentative essays are such a useful tool for developing and evaluating critical thinking skills, you’ll have to write several of them during high school and college.

There are many arguments that you can make for, or against, the death penalty. Here are a few potential topics regarding capital punishment, which you can consider if you’re writing an argumentative essay.

• The death penalty is a deterrent that prevents potential criminals from committing serious crimes like murder.
• The death penalty is not effective at preventing crime.
• Capital punishment is more cost-effective than lifetime incarceration, which requires the State to pay for a person’s food, lodging, healthcare, and other things for the rest of their lives.
• The death penalty, “a life for a life,” is a just response to murder.
• The justice system does not have the intrinsic moral right to take a life, even that of a murderer.
• The death penalty is more humane than lifetime imprisonment.
• The death penalty is cruel and inhumane.
• Lethal injection is a painless and humane method of execution.
• Lethal injection is ethically questionable, can cause pain, and is often administered by people who are not trained medical professionals.
• People deserving of the death penalty can never be rehabilitated or reintroduced to society.
• Capital punishment deprives the individual of the chance for redemption and rehabilitation.
• The death penalty creates the risk of the execution of someone who is actually innocent.
• The death penalty can be abused or applied unfairly, making it dangerous to allow capital punishment.

“   Every writer, no matter how good he is with his first attempt should proofread his paper.  ” –  Donna Brians

This resource changes all old-fashioned cliches and boring techniques into new and original ways of writing. Like to come here for fresh ideas!

Never thought writing can be so captivating! Thank you for helping me every time I need!

Writing Partners

Popular Tips

• Creating a perfect paper
• Essay on capital punishment
• Finding an essay writing company
• Where to buy an essay without troubles

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Death Penalty — The Death Penalty: A Philosophical Exploration

The Death Penalty: a Philosophical Exploration

• Categories: Death Penalty

About this sample

Words: 617 |

Published: Aug 1, 2024

Words: 617 | Page: 1 | 4 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

• Expert in: Social Issues

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 791 words

4 pages / 1775 words

3 pages / 1282 words

2 pages / 764 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Death Penalty

Should the death penalty be abolished? Essay on this question can be quite controversial, no matter what side of the argument is chosen. But it is important to understand the reasons why the death penalty should be abolished. [...]

The death penalty, a contentious and polarizing issue, has been a subject of debate for centuries. It involves the state-sanctioned execution of a person as punishment for a serious crime. While many countries have abolished the [...]

The death of a moth may seem like a trivial event, but Virginia Woolf's essay "The Death of the Moth" suggests otherwise. Through her vivid and poetic language, Woolf portrays the inevitability of death and the fragility of [...]

The death penalty is a highly controversial topic that has sparked debate and discussion for centuries. It refers to the legal process of sentencing an individual to death as punishment for a crime they have committed. This [...]

The "death penalty" should never exist in the first place. The "death penalty" is wrong.. It should not be given to anybody, whether they are under the age of 18 or not. It is morally wrong and will be the doom of America, The [...]

I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation. Discussing the death penalty pros and cons, there are many reasons as to why I think the death penalty should be legalized in all states, including deterrence, [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• Share full article

Advertisement

The Morning

The threat of more war.

We examine the contradictions in the Middle East.

By Vivian Nereim

This week was supposed to bring a rare moment of amity in the Middle East. Iran inaugurated a new president, and its regional rival, Saudi Arabia, dispatched a royal to Tehran with a jovial letter from its king, sending his best wishes. The United Arab Emirates, attacked by the Iranian-backed Houthis just two years ago, published photos of its smiling foreign minister shaking hands with Iranian officials. And a White House spokesman had said that a cease-fire deal in Gaza was “close.”

Instead, the region now seems to be even further away from peace. Yesterday, Iran and Hamas accused Israel of killing Ismail Haniyeh, one of the most senior leaders of Hamas, while he was in Tehran. (Haniyeh was Hamas’s lead negotiator in cease-fire talks to end the Gaza war, which began with the Oct. 7 attacks.) The day before, Israel killed a leader of Hezbollah in Beirut after a rocket launched from Lebanon had killed 12 children in Israeli-occupied territory.

Diplomats around the world are telling these parties to keep a lid on it. And the groups themselves say they do not want a wider regional war. Israel’s defense minister repeated the message on Wednesday. Iran has said the same thing, and so has Hezbollah. (Hamas has said it wants a wider war , but it is depleted from nearly 10 months of conflict in Gaza.)

Yet the violence persists, as each party claims its attacks are reactions to previous ones. That’s why, in the span of a few months, Israeli bombs have hit Lebanon, Syria, Iran and Yemen. It’s why Hezbollah and Houthi fighters have repeatedly targeted Israel (and also ships passing through the Red Sea, disrupting global trade). It’s why American airstrikes have pummeled Yemen for nearly seven months.

The reality

When I speak to sources in the Middle East, they often struggle to process this contradiction. To them, the calls for peace during what already looks like a regional war can sound strange. Bader Al-Saif, a historian at Kuwait University, lamented “the amount of denialism surrounding this basic fact.” Pretending as if the actual conflict is yet to arrive, he said, risks “normalizing death, violence, fear, dispossession, hunger and lack of dignity across the Middle East.”

True, de-escalation may be wanted — and it may even be possible. Analysts say that Iran and Hezbollah, despite vengeful rhetoric, could keep their responses measured. Israeli assassinations abroad are nothing new , and some top Israeli generals believe a truce, not more war, would free captives still held by Hamas. Israel could seek to limit its response to any counterattack by Iran. Antony Blinken, the U.S. secretary of state, said yesterday that he was still intent on reaching a cease-fire in Gaza.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .

The Death Penalty in the US Criminal Justice System Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

Introduction

The death penalty has been a largely debated form of punishment in the U.S. since its inception. The law supporting this unkind and unfair sentence was thus, put under scrutiny and consequently several death sentences were either overturned or could only be carried out on proportionate grounds by the supreme courts heralding a new era in the criminal justice system of the US.

The legal arguments for this decision made by the higher courts were cited in line with the 8 th amendment that called for the exclusive considerations on several factors that mainly touched on racial disparities, age of a convict, proper evidence that can incriminate the accused persons, respective human rights action plans against such people, satisfactory judgment delivered either by unanimous decision or a majority of votes by the judges and so on (Burns 1).

The Supreme Court made a decision based on the 8 th amendment to relook into criminal cases viewed as cruel or unusual, and instead provided an alternative favorable form of punishment. Most death sentences were slashed down to life imprisonment, leaving only deserved cases as death sentences.

For instance, some states were forced to repackage their judicial laws after realizing that the judgment commonly delivered never materialized particularly when the cases involved were referred back to the supreme courts, which in turn, after careful hearing, overturned the rulings in favor of the accused. This occurred in cases that were considered to lack the 8 th amendment thresholds for the death penalty.

These circumstances made several states to re-enact laws governing the death penalty, which was a major concern to the supreme courts’ contradiction to the imposition of death sentence arbitrarily. The application of such fair trials justifying the subsequent sentences handed down by the supreme courts began from the year 1972.

This was after the capital punishment was found to be unconstitutionally biased and cruel. An exception to this is in cases where sentences were delivered after considering the extra routine endorsement. The cases and the respective judgment on the death penalty jurisprudence handed by the supreme courts entirely depended on the moral significance culpable by the law and factors of discretion (Head 1).

The Supreme Court in accordance with the laws governing the 8th amendment decided that death penalty for a minor is a harsh kind of penalty. This is supported by the fact that in a 5-4 court ruling, it was labeled unconstitutional when any convict at the time of committing the crime is below the age of 18.

Thus, it is morally incorrect to implicate children who commit crime in relation to adults who has acted in the same way since their respective intentions cannot apply together. Example of such ruling involving a minor was a criminal case for Christopher Simmons who was sentenced to death but later overruled; Case, Roper v Simmons.

Another example of such case in which the age of a convict was contested involved a 15 year old at the time of committing the crime. William Thompson was sentenced to death after being convicted of murder. Due to this, the Supreme Court overturned the decision of an Oklahoma court by explaining that the execution of the minor violated the eighth amendment statute. The case here is, Thompson v. Oklahoma.

Racial disparities

Another main issue surrounding the death penalty is the racial inequality that has been historically characteristic with handing of the penalty in the U.S. For instance, consider a case involving an African American who was convicted of two counts of robbery plus one count of murder. After convictions in county courts and subsequently condemned to death, his plea was heard whereby the Supreme Court ruling overturned the death penalty imposed.

The final ruling stated that the majority should not dictate matters of humanity since it is unconstitutional. For example, it was viewed that those accused of killing white people could easily be handed the death sentence compared to murderers for black persons. After much consideration and scrutiny of the penalty, the courts offered a platform for the voiceless like the accused person in question.i.e case, McCleskey v kemp.

Mental state of the convict

Mental instability in most people is believed to have unnatural rage subconscious to a person’s mind. It is for this reason that informed the Supreme Court to offer a reprieve on death penalty for mentally retarded persons who commit a criminal offence.

As a result of this, the death sentence was found to be unconstitutionally excessive thereby restricting the state’s power to deliver death penalty as a form of punishment on similar cases under the same state of mind. For instance, Daryl Atkins was convicted of murder even though his IQ score was 59 hence; the Supreme Court reversed the earlier ruling which did not evaluate his condition as that of mild mental condition; Case, Atkins v. Virginia (Jacobs 1).

Proper evidence of aggravating circumstances

Proper reasons were to be evaluated so as to be used against a convict. For instance, in order to incriminate a person, the Supreme Court made a decision to provide a clear distinction on where imposition of death can be allowed. It was unanimously passed that there could be circumstances when the evidence produced could exempt on the death penalty for non-murder offenses like rape except for crimes comparable to treason.

This was seen during the trial for Antonym Coker who escaped from custody but got re-arrested and condemned to death penalty for rape. The Supreme Court in turn overturned the first sentence arguing that it was too harsh on the ground that most rape cases may not involve murder.

Another similar case in which a sentence by the lower court was annulled by that of the Supreme Court took place in Lousiana.The criminal case involved Patrick Kennedy accused of raping his 8 year old step daughter. The Supreme Court then scrutinized his case after a successful appeal against a capital punishment handed earlier.

The argument of the higher court then concluded that imposing the death penalty against the convict was against the 8 th amendment and therefore unconstitutional because the crime neither resulted nor was intended to terminate the innocent life of his victim (Radelet & Akers 1). Therefore, the ruling decided that the accused should instead be sent to life imprisonment; Case, Kennedy v. Louisiana.

Method of delivering the death sentence

In cases where the method used to administer the death penalty is considered cruel and painful, the Supreme Court could then deliberate on a particular ruling by a junior state court. This was observed during the sentencing of Ralph Baze who was convicted for murder and sure enough condemned to death by a Kentucky state court by lethal injection and instead appealed against the ruling, only for the sentence to be re-affirmed by the Supreme Court since the method for its application was considered safe after all.

The same scenario was also witnessed during the trial of Jimmy L. Glass who was sentenced to death according to the legal argument of Louisiana court by electrocution. Through his lawyers, he argued that the application and the intensity when passing the death sentence through electrocution can cause serious injuries and pain and therefore do not meet the humane standards as required by the constitution (White 1). The final judgment by the Supreme Court thus dismissed the petition thereby allowing the lower court’s ruling to go ahead; Case, Jimmy L. Glass v.Lousiana.

Improper judgment

Pending cases provided relevant provisions to re-appeal the death sentence if the trial is perceived to be as a result of discretion of a judge determining the outcome of a case almost single handedly. Take for example, the trial of Timothy Ring, a convict of first degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment only for a state judge to step-up the penalty to another sentence by death.

Consequently though, the Supreme Court reversed the decision citing that statutory maximum sentence should be put before a jury panel since the judge was found to have acted improperly without a sitting legal bench who could have delivered a unanimous decision; Case, Ring v. Arizona.

Special procedure for capital penalty

It was realized that rulings could impose the death penalty by ignoring the nature or circumstance preceding a crime. Therefore, it was required that a jury must be able to cite a possible statutory aggravating legal requirement before delivering any formal penalty by death.

Such a case where the judgment was allowed to stand as it was involved Troy Leon who was convicted for robbery and murder for which he was handed over death sentence (Head 1). On challenging his trial, the Supreme Court rejected his plea and instead maintained the earlier verdict by dismissing the robbery factor since the statutory system was not found to violate the constitutional statutes; Case, Gregg v. Georgia.

The legislative judgments of some states

Several courts in some states decided to respond to the modification of the death penalty especially for murder committed in relation to a felony. Such states that rejected the death penalty arising from committing a felony therefore illegalized the practice hence the Supreme Court found it as an appropriate way by providing more options for fair trial.

This was arrived at after establishing the fact that, the death penalty usually imposed may be too harsh for a convict who did not participate in a murder or intended to carry out such heinous act. A case of study featured Enmund in which the death penalty was outlawed when determining the ultimate ruling by the supreme judges since they decided that it could not be imposed under circumstances of felony; Case, Enmund v. Florida.

Contrary to the above case where a reprieve was provided by the Supreme Court, in Tison’s case, several state supreme courts amended their interpretation of the death penalty during such a case involving a felony by allowing capital punishment to take precedence in such future cases (White 1). This particular case was determined by analyzing noticeable circumstances of felony during the murder. The death penalty verdict was thus delivered since inquiries revealed passion and recklessness; Case, Tison v. Arizona.

From the above discussion, it is apparent that the suitability of imposing a death is questionable. From a number of precedents set on the death penalty, it is apparent that giving a life imprisonment instead of a death penalty will be more humane than a death penalty in permissible situations. All in all, a death penalty should be avoided as much as possible.

Works Cited

Burns, Kari. “ Punishment: Death penalty ”. 2011. Web.

Head, Tom. “ The Eighth Amendment ”. 2011. Web.

Jacobs, Nancy. “Death Penalty Essay”. 2011. Web.

Radelet, M & Akers, R. “ Deterrence and the Death Penalty? The Views of the Experts ,” (1995) White, Debora.

“ Pros and cons of the death penalty ”. 2011. Web.

• Sexual Misconduct: Problem and Solutions
• The Consequences of Capital Punishment
• Left Handed Capability of Cross Dominance
• The Current Statute on Robbery
• Felony Court System Administration
• Theories Required to be Successful in Supervisory Practices in the Criminal Justice Field
• Police-Youth Relations and Community Policing
• Criminal Law of Battered Woman Syndrome
• Moral Issue of Capital Punishment
• The Illegal Use of Marijuana
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2019, March 22). The Death Penalty in the US Criminal Justice System. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-death-penalty-3/

"The Death Penalty in the US Criminal Justice System." IvyPanda , 22 Mar. 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/the-death-penalty-3/.

IvyPanda . (2019) 'The Death Penalty in the US Criminal Justice System'. 22 March.

IvyPanda . 2019. "The Death Penalty in the US Criminal Justice System." March 22, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-death-penalty-3/.

1. IvyPanda . "The Death Penalty in the US Criminal Justice System." March 22, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-death-penalty-3/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "The Death Penalty in the US Criminal Justice System." March 22, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-death-penalty-3/.