2. variables
3. variables
4. variables
5. variables
6. variables
7. variables
8. variables
The simplest way to understand a variable is as any characteristic or attribute that can experience change or vary over time or context – hence the name “variable”. For example, the dosage of a particular medicine could be classified as a variable, as the amount can vary (i.e., a higher dose or a lower dose). Similarly, gender, age or ethnicity could be considered demographic variables, because each person varies in these respects.
Within research, especially scientific research, variables form the foundation of studies, as researchers are often interested in how one variable impacts another, and the relationships between different variables. For example:
As you can see, variables are often used to explain relationships between different elements and phenomena. In scientific studies, especially experimental studies, the objective is often to understand the causal relationships between variables. In other words, the role of cause and effect between variables. This is achieved by manipulating certain variables while controlling others – and then observing the outcome. But, we’ll get into that a little later…
Variables can be a little intimidating for new researchers because there are a wide variety of variables, and oftentimes, there are multiple labels for the same thing. To lay a firm foundation, we’ll first look at the three main types of variables, namely:
Simply put, the independent variable is the “ cause ” in the relationship between two (or more) variables. In other words, when the independent variable changes, it has an impact on another variable.
For example:
It’s useful to know that independent variables can go by a few different names, including, explanatory variables (because they explain an event or outcome) and predictor variables (because they predict the value of another variable). Terminology aside though, the most important takeaway is that independent variables are assumed to be the “cause” in any cause-effect relationship. As you can imagine, these types of variables are of major interest to researchers, as many studies seek to understand the causal factors behind a phenomenon.
While the independent variable is the “ cause ”, the dependent variable is the “ effect ” – or rather, the affected variable . In other words, the dependent variable is the variable that is assumed to change as a result of a change in the independent variable.
Keeping with the previous example, let’s look at some dependent variables in action:
In scientific studies, researchers will typically pay very close attention to the dependent variable (or variables), carefully measuring any changes in response to hypothesised independent variables. This can be tricky in practice, as it’s not always easy to reliably measure specific phenomena or outcomes – or to be certain that the actual cause of the change is in fact the independent variable.
As the adage goes, correlation is not causation . In other words, just because two variables have a relationship doesn’t mean that it’s a causal relationship – they may just happen to vary together. For example, you could find a correlation between the number of people who own a certain brand of car and the number of people who have a certain type of job. Just because the number of people who own that brand of car and the number of people who have that type of job is correlated, it doesn’t mean that owning that brand of car causes someone to have that type of job or vice versa. The correlation could, for example, be caused by another factor such as income level or age group, which would affect both car ownership and job type.
To confidently establish a causal relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable (i.e., X causes Y), you’ll typically need an experimental design , where you have complete control over the environmen t and the variables of interest. But even so, this doesn’t always translate into the “real world”. Simply put, what happens in the lab sometimes stays in the lab!
As an alternative to pure experimental research, correlational or “ quasi-experimental ” research (where the researcher cannot manipulate or change variables) can be done on a much larger scale more easily, allowing one to understand specific relationships in the real world. These types of studies also assume some causality between independent and dependent variables, but it’s not always clear. So, if you go this route, you need to be cautious in terms of how you describe the impact and causality between variables and be sure to acknowledge any limitations in your own research.
In an experimental design, a control variable (or controlled variable) is a variable that is intentionally held constant to ensure it doesn’t have an influence on any other variables. As a result, this variable remains unchanged throughout the course of the study. In other words, it’s a variable that’s not allowed to vary – tough life 🙂
As we mentioned earlier, one of the major challenges in identifying and measuring causal relationships is that it’s difficult to isolate the impact of variables other than the independent variable. Simply put, there’s always a risk that there are factors beyond the ones you’re specifically looking at that might be impacting the results of your study. So, to minimise the risk of this, researchers will attempt (as best possible) to hold other variables constant . These factors are then considered control variables.
Some examples of variables that you may need to control include:
Which specific variables need to be controlled for will vary tremendously depending on the research project at hand, so there’s no generic list of control variables to consult. As a researcher, you’ll need to think carefully about all the factors that could vary within your research context and then consider how you’ll go about controlling them. A good starting point is to look at previous studies similar to yours and pay close attention to which variables they controlled for.
Of course, you won’t always be able to control every possible variable, and so, in many cases, you’ll just have to acknowledge their potential impact and account for them in the conclusions you draw. Every study has its limitations , so don’t get fixated or discouraged by troublesome variables. Nevertheless, always think carefully about the factors beyond what you’re focusing on – don’t make assumptions!
As we mentioned, independent, dependent and control variables are the most common variables you’ll come across in your research, but they’re certainly not the only ones you need to be aware of. Next, we’ll look at a few “secondary” variables that you need to keep in mind as you design your research.
Let’s jump into it…
A moderating variable is a variable that influences the strength or direction of the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. In other words, moderating variables affect how much (or how little) the IV affects the DV, or whether the IV has a positive or negative relationship with the DV (i.e., moves in the same or opposite direction).
For example, in a study about the effects of sleep deprivation on academic performance, gender could be used as a moderating variable to see if there are any differences in how men and women respond to a lack of sleep. In such a case, one may find that gender has an influence on how much students’ scores suffer when they’re deprived of sleep.
It’s important to note that while moderators can have an influence on outcomes , they don’t necessarily cause them ; rather they modify or “moderate” existing relationships between other variables. This means that it’s possible for two different groups with similar characteristics, but different levels of moderation, to experience very different results from the same experiment or study design.
Mediating variables are often used to explain the relationship between the independent and dependent variable (s). For example, if you were researching the effects of age on job satisfaction, then education level could be considered a mediating variable, as it may explain why older people have higher job satisfaction than younger people – they may have more experience or better qualifications, which lead to greater job satisfaction.
Mediating variables also help researchers understand how different factors interact with each other to influence outcomes. For instance, if you wanted to study the effect of stress on academic performance, then coping strategies might act as a mediating factor by influencing both stress levels and academic performance simultaneously. For example, students who use effective coping strategies might be less stressed but also perform better academically due to their improved mental state.
In addition, mediating variables can provide insight into causal relationships between two variables by helping researchers determine whether changes in one factor directly cause changes in another – or whether there is an indirect relationship between them mediated by some third factor(s). For instance, if you wanted to investigate the impact of parental involvement on student achievement, you would need to consider family dynamics as a potential mediator, since it could influence both parental involvement and student achievement simultaneously.
A confounding variable (also known as a third variable or lurking variable ) is an extraneous factor that can influence the relationship between two variables being studied. Specifically, for a variable to be considered a confounding variable, it needs to meet two criteria:
Some common examples of confounding variables include demographic factors such as gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, education level, and health status. In addition to these, there are also environmental factors to consider. For example, air pollution could confound the impact of the variables of interest in a study investigating health outcomes.
Naturally, it’s important to identify as many confounding variables as possible when conducting your research, as they can heavily distort the results and lead you to draw incorrect conclusions . So, always think carefully about what factors may have a confounding effect on your variables of interest and try to manage these as best you can.
Latent variables are unobservable factors that can influence the behaviour of individuals and explain certain outcomes within a study. They’re also known as hidden or underlying variables , and what makes them rather tricky is that they can’t be directly observed or measured . Instead, latent variables must be inferred from other observable data points such as responses to surveys or experiments.
For example, in a study of mental health, the variable “resilience” could be considered a latent variable. It can’t be directly measured , but it can be inferred from measures of mental health symptoms, stress, and coping mechanisms. The same applies to a lot of concepts we encounter every day – for example:
One way in which we overcome the challenge of measuring the immeasurable is latent variable models (LVMs). An LVM is a type of statistical model that describes a relationship between observed variables and one or more unobserved (latent) variables. These models allow researchers to uncover patterns in their data which may not have been visible before, thanks to their complexity and interrelatedness with other variables. Those patterns can then inform hypotheses about cause-and-effect relationships among those same variables which were previously unknown prior to running the LVM. Powerful stuff, we say!
In the world of scientific research, there’s no shortage of variable types, some of which have multiple names and some of which overlap with each other. In this post, we’ve covered some of the popular ones, but remember that this is not an exhaustive list .
To recap, we’ve explored:
If you’re still feeling a bit lost and need a helping hand with your research project, check out our 1-on-1 coaching service , where we guide you through each step of the research journey. Also, be sure to check out our free dissertation writing course and our collection of free, fully-editable chapter templates .
This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...
Very informative, concise and helpful. Thank you
Helping information.Thanks
practical and well-demonstrated
Very helpful and insightful
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Saul Mcleod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul Mcleod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
On This Page:
In research, a variable is any characteristic, number, or quantity that can be measured or counted in experimental investigations . One is called the dependent variable, and the other is the independent variable.
In research, the independent variable is manipulated to observe its effect, while the dependent variable is the measured outcome. Essentially, the independent variable is the presumed cause, and the dependent variable is the observed effect.
Variables provide the foundation for examining relationships, drawing conclusions, and making predictions in research studies.
In psychology, the independent variable is the variable the experimenter manipulates or changes and is assumed to directly affect the dependent variable.
It’s considered the cause or factor that drives change, allowing psychologists to observe how it influences behavior, emotions, or other dependent variables in an experimental setting. Essentially, it’s the presumed cause in cause-and-effect relationships being studied.
For example, allocating participants to drug or placebo conditions (independent variable) to measure any changes in the intensity of their anxiety (dependent variable).
In a well-designed experimental study , the independent variable is the only important difference between the experimental (e.g., treatment) and control (e.g., placebo) groups.
By changing the independent variable and holding other factors constant, psychologists aim to determine if it causes a change in another variable, called the dependent variable.
For example, in a study investigating the effects of sleep on memory, the amount of sleep (e.g., 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours) would be the independent variable, as the researcher might manipulate or categorize it to see its impact on memory recall, which would be the dependent variable.
In psychology, the dependent variable is the variable being tested and measured in an experiment and is “dependent” on the independent variable.
In psychology, a dependent variable represents the outcome or results and can change based on the manipulations of the independent variable. Essentially, it’s the presumed effect in a cause-and-effect relationship being studied.
An example of a dependent variable is depression symptoms, which depend on the independent variable (type of therapy).
In an experiment, the researcher looks for the possible effect on the dependent variable that might be caused by changing the independent variable.
For instance, in a study examining the effects of a new study technique on exam performance, the technique would be the independent variable (as it is being introduced or manipulated), while the exam scores would be the dependent variable (as they represent the outcome of interest that’s being measured).
For example, we might change the type of information (e.g., organized or random) given to participants to see how this might affect the amount of information remembered.
In this example, the type of information is the independent variable (because it changes), and the amount of information remembered is the dependent variable (because this is being measured).
For the following hypotheses, name the IV and the DV.
1. Lack of sleep significantly affects learning in 10-year-old boys.
IV……………………………………………………
DV…………………………………………………..
2. Social class has a significant effect on IQ scores.
DV……………………………………………….…
3. Stressful experiences significantly increase the likelihood of headaches.
4. Time of day has a significant effect on alertness.
To ensure cause and effect are established, it is important that we identify exactly how the independent and dependent variables will be measured; this is known as operationalizing the variables.
Operational variables (or operationalizing definitions) refer to how you will define and measure a specific variable as it is used in your study. This enables another psychologist to replicate your research and is essential in establishing reliability (achieving consistency in the results).
For example, if we are concerned with the effect of media violence on aggression, then we need to be very clear about what we mean by the different terms. In this case, we must state what we mean by the terms “media violence” and “aggression” as we will study them.
Therefore, you could state that “media violence” is operationally defined (in your experiment) as ‘exposure to a 15-minute film showing scenes of physical assault’; “aggression” is operationally defined as ‘levels of electrical shocks administered to a second ‘participant’ in another room.
In another example, the hypothesis “Young participants will have significantly better memories than older participants” is not operationalized. How do we define “young,” “old,” or “memory”? “Participants aged between 16 – 30 will recall significantly more nouns from a list of twenty than participants aged between 55 – 70” is operationalized.
The key point here is that we have clarified what we mean by the terms as they were studied and measured in our experiment.
If we didn’t do this, it would be very difficult (if not impossible) to compare the findings of different studies to the same behavior.
Operationalization has the advantage of generally providing a clear and objective definition of even complex variables. It also makes it easier for other researchers to replicate a study and check for reliability .
For the following hypotheses, name the IV and the DV and operationalize both variables.
1. Women are more attracted to men without earrings than men with earrings.
I.V._____________________________________________________________
D.V. ____________________________________________________________
Operational definitions:
I.V. ____________________________________________________________
2. People learn more when they study in a quiet versus noisy place.
I.V. _________________________________________________________
D.V. ___________________________________________________________
3. People who exercise regularly sleep better at night.
Yes, it is possible to have more than one independent or dependent variable in a study.
In some studies, researchers may want to explore how multiple factors affect the outcome, so they include more than one independent variable.
Similarly, they may measure multiple things to see how they are influenced, resulting in multiple dependent variables. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the topic being studied.
Ethical considerations related to independent and dependent variables involve treating participants fairly and protecting their rights.
Researchers must ensure that participants provide informed consent and that their privacy and confidentiality are respected. Additionally, it is important to avoid manipulating independent variables in ways that could cause harm or discomfort to participants.
Researchers should also consider the potential impact of their study on vulnerable populations and ensure that their methods are unbiased and free from discrimination.
Ethical guidelines help ensure that research is conducted responsibly and with respect for the well-being of the participants involved.
Yes, both quantitative and qualitative data can have independent and dependent variables.
In quantitative research, independent variables are usually measured numerically and manipulated to understand their impact on the dependent variable. In qualitative research, independent variables can be qualitative in nature, such as individual experiences, cultural factors, or social contexts, influencing the phenomenon of interest.
The dependent variable, in both cases, is what is being observed or studied to see how it changes in response to the independent variable.
So, regardless of the type of data, researchers analyze the relationship between independent and dependent variables to gain insights into their research questions.
Yes, the same variable can be independent in one study and dependent in another.
The classification of a variable as independent or dependent depends on how it is used within a specific study. In one study, a variable might be manipulated or controlled to see its effect on another variable, making it independent.
However, in a different study, that same variable might be the one being measured or observed to understand its relationship with another variable, making it dependent.
The role of a variable as independent or dependent can vary depending on the research question and study design.
Related Articles
Research Methodology
Mixed Methods Research
Conversation Analysis
Discourse Analysis
Phenomenology In Qualitative Research
Ethnography In Qualitative Research
Narrative Analysis In Qualitative Research
Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey
A variable is an important element of research. It is a characteristic, number, or quantity of any category that can be measured or counted and whose value may change with time or other parameters.
Variables are defined in different ways in different fields. For instance, in mathematics, a variable is an alphabetic character that expresses a numerical value. In algebra, a variable represents an unknown entity, mostly denoted by a, b, c, x, y, z, etc. In statistics, variables represent real-world conditions or factors. Despite the differences in definitions, in all fields, variables represent the entity that changes and help us understand how one factor may or may not influence another factor.
Variables in research and statistics are of different types—independent, dependent, quantitative (discrete or continuous), qualitative (nominal/categorical, ordinal), intervening, moderating, extraneous, confounding, control, and composite. In this article we compare the first two types— independent vs dependent variables .
Table of Contents
Researchers conduct experiments to understand the cause-and-effect relationships between various entities. In such experiments, the entities whose values change are called variables. These variables describe the relationships among various factors and help in drawing conclusions in experiments. They help in understanding how some factors influence others. Some examples of variables include age, gender, race, income, weight, etc.
As mentioned earlier, different types of variables are used in research. Of these, we will compare the most common types— independent vs dependent variables . The independent variable is the cause and the dependent variable is the effect, that is, independent variables influence dependent variables. In research, a dependent variable is the outcome of interest of the study and the independent variable is the factor that may influence the outcome. Let’s explain this with an independent and dependent variable example : In a study to analyze the effect of antibiotic use on microbial resistance, antibiotic use is the independent variable and microbial resistance is the dependent variable because antibiotic use affects microbial resistance.( 1)
Here is a list of the important characteristics of independent variables .( 2,3)
Independent variables in research are of the following two types:( 4)
Quantitative independent variables differ in amounts or scales. They are numeric and answer questions like “how many” or “how often.”
Here are a few quantitative independent variables examples :
Qualitative independent variables are non-numerical variables.
A few qualitative independent variables examples are listed below:
A quantitative variable is represented by actual amounts and a qualitative variable by categories or groups.
Here are a few characteristics of dependent variables: ( 3)
Here are a few dependent variable examples :
Dependent variables are of two types:( 5)
These variables can take on any value within a given range and are measured on a continuous scale, for example, weight, height, temperature, time, distance, etc.
These variables are divided into distinct categories. They are not measured on a continuous scale so only a limited number of values are possible, for example, gender, race, etc.
The following table compares independent vs dependent variables .
How to identify | Manipulated or controlled | Observed or measured |
Purpose | Cause or predictor variable | Outcome or response variable |
Relationship | Independent of other variables | Influenced by the independent variable |
Control | Manipulated or assigned by researcher | Measured or observed during experiments |
Listed below are a few examples of research questions from various disciplines and their corresponding independent and dependent variables.( 6)
Genetics | What is the relationship between genetics and susceptibility to diseases? | genetic factors | susceptibility to diseases |
History | How do historical events influence national identity? | historical events | national identity |
Political science | What is the effect of political campaign advertisements on voter behavior? | political campaign advertisements | voter behavior |
Sociology | How does social media influence cultural awareness? | social media exposure | cultural awareness |
Economics | What is the impact of economic policies on unemployment rates? | economic policies | unemployment rates |
Literature | How does literary criticism affect book sales? | literary criticism | book sales |
Geology | How do a region’s geological features influence the magnitude of earthquakes? | geological features | earthquake magnitudes |
Environment | How do changes in climate affect wildlife migration patterns? | climate changes | wildlife migration patterns |
Gender studies | What is the effect of gender bias in the workplace on job satisfaction? | gender bias | job satisfaction |
Film studies | What is the relationship between cinematographic techniques and viewer engagement? | cinematographic techniques | viewer engagement |
Archaeology | How does archaeological tourism affect local communities? | archaeological techniques | local community development |
Experiments usually have at least two variables—independent and dependent. The independent variable is the entity that is being tested and the dependent variable is the result. Classifying independent and dependent variables as discrete and continuous can help in determining the type of analysis that is appropriate in any given research experiment, as shown in the table below. ( 7)
Chi-Square | t-test | ||
Logistic regression | ANOVA | ||
Phi | Regression | ||
Cramer’s V | Point-biserial correlation | ||
Logistic regression | Regression | ||
Point-biserial correlation | Correlation |
Here are some more research questions and their corresponding independent and dependent variables. ( 6)
What is the impact of online learning platforms on academic performance? | type of learning | academic performance |
What is the association between exercise frequency and mental health? | exercise frequency | mental health |
How does smartphone use affect productivity? | smartphone use | productivity levels |
Does family structure influence adolescent behavior? | family structure | adolescent behavior |
What is the impact of nonverbal communication on job interviews? | nonverbal communication | job interviews |
In addition to all the characteristics of independent and dependent variables listed previously, here are few simple steps to identify the variable types in a research question.( 8)
Let’s try out these steps with an example.
A researcher wants to conduct a study to see if his new weight loss medication performs better than two bestseller alternatives. He wants to randomly select 20 subjects from Richmond, Virginia, aged 20 to 30 years and weighing above 60 pounds. Each subject will be randomly assigned to three treatment groups.
To identify the independent and dependent variables, we convert this paragraph into a question, as follows: Does the new medication perform better than the alternatives? Here, the medications are the independent variable and their performances or effect on the individuals are the dependent variable.
Data visualization is the graphical representation of information by using charts, graphs, and maps. Visualizations help in making data more understandable by making it easier to compare elements, identify trends and relationships (among variables), among other functions.
Bar graphs, pie charts, and scatter plots are the best methods to graphically represent variables. While pie charts and bar graphs are suitable for depicting categorical data, scatter plots are appropriate for quantitative data. The independent variable is usually placed on the X-axis and the dependent variable on the Y-axis.
Figure 1 is a scatter plot that depicts the relationship between the number of household members and their monthly grocery expenses. 9 The number of household members is the independent variable and the expenses the dependent variable. The graph shows that as the number of members increases the expenditure also increases.
Let’s summarize the key takeaways about independent vs dependent variables from this article:
The following table lists the different types of variables used in research.( 10)
Categorical | Measures a construct that has different categories | gender, race, religious affiliation, political affiliation |
Quantitative | Measures constructs that vary by degree of the amount | weight, height, age, intelligence scores |
Independent (IV) | Measures constructs considered to be the cause | Higher education (IV) leads to higher income (DV) |
Dependent (DV) | Measures constructs that are considered the effect | Exercise (IV) will reduce anxiety levels (DV) |
Intervening or mediating (MV) | Measures constructs that intervene or stand in between the cause and effect | Incarcerated individuals are more likely to have psychiatric disorder (MV), which leads to disability in social roles |
Confounding (CV) | “Rival explanations” that explain the cause-and-effect relationship | Age (CV) explains the relationship between increased shoe size and increase in intelligence in children |
Control variable | Extraneous variables whose influence can be controlled or eliminated | Demographic data such as gender, socioeconomic status, age |
2. Why is it important to differentiate between independent vs dependent variables ?
Differentiating between independent vs dependent variables is important to ensure the correct application in your own research and also the correct understanding of other studies. An incorrectly framed research question can lead to confusion and inaccurate results. An easy way to differentiate is to identify the cause and effect.
3. How are independent and dependent variables used in non-experimental research?
So far in this article we talked about variables in relation to experimental research, wherein variables are manipulated or measured to test a hypothesis, that is, to observe the effect on dependent variables. Let’s examine non-experimental research and how variable are used. 11 In non-experimental research, variables are not manipulated but are observed in their natural state. Researchers do not have control over the variables and cannot manipulate them based on their research requirements. For example, a study examining the relationship between income and education level would not manipulate either variable. Instead, the researcher would observe and measure the levels of each variable in the sample population. The level of control researchers have is the major difference between experimental and non-experimental research. Another difference is the causal relationship between the variables. In non-experimental research, it is not possible to establish a causal relationship because other variables may be influencing the outcome.
4. Are there any advantages and disadvantages of using independent vs dependent variables ?
Here are a few advantages and disadvantages of both independent and dependent variables.( 12)
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
We hope this article has provided you with an insight into the use and importance of independent vs dependent variables , which can help you effectively use variables in your next research study.
Researcher.Life is a subscription-based platform that unifies the best AI tools and services designed to speed up, simplify, and streamline every step of a researcher’s journey. The Researcher.Life All Access Pack is a one-of-a-kind subscription that unlocks full access to an AI writing assistant, literature recommender, journal finder, scientific illustration tool, and exclusive discounts on professional publication services from Editage.
Based on 21+ years of experience in academia, Researcher.Life All Access empowers researchers to put their best research forward and move closer to success. Explore our top AI Tools pack, AI Tools + Publication Services pack, or Build Your Own Plan. Find everything a researcher needs to succeed, all in one place – Get All Access now starting at just $17 a month !
Introduction
Research variables
Variables are key components of every research study. Understanding their roles is important when you use a research methodology. What are Independent Variables (IV)? These are variables that are changed/manipulated so that their impact on the dependent variables can be monitored. What are Dependent Variables (DV)? These are variables that rely on something else(the independent variables) to occur/change before they can have a result. Dependent Variables are usually the variables the researcher is interested in. Differences between Independent Variables and Dependent Variables 1. Independent Variables are the manipulators or causes or influencers WHILE Dependent Variables are the results or effects or outcome. 2. Independent variables are "independent of" prior causes that act on it WHILE Dependent Variables "depend on" the cause.
Relationship between Hypothesis and Variables A hypothesis is a prediction of what the study will find or the answer to a research question. A hypothesis is an empirical statement that can be verified based upon observation or experiment or experience A hypothesis is testable to be true or false through the research study findings. Variables are found in the hypothesis or research question. In a hypothesis, you can see how variables operate in a research study. How to identify independent and dependent research variables To identify Independent research variables, look for items in your research question or hypothesis that manipulates, causes or influences something or a reaction. To identify Dependent research variables, look for items in your research question or hypothesis that sees the result, effect or outcome of changing the independent variable. Some Examples Example 1 - Research Topic: Decision making and its impact on an organization "Decision making" influences the organization, therefore, this is the Independent Variable "impact in an organization" the organization is being impacted on, therefore, this is the dependent variable Example 2 - Hypothesis/Research Question: What effects do multiple taxations have on small scale businesses "multiple taxations" causes an action, therefore, this is the Independent Variable "small scale businesses" receives the effects of multiple taxations, therefore, this is the Dependent Variable Example 3 - Hypothesis/Research Question: What influence do democratic leadership style and motivation have on employee performance of these businesses "democratic leadership style" and "motivation" both cause an effect, therefore, these are the Independent Variables "employee performance" is being impacted, therefore, this is the Dependent Variable The basic rule is to look for what causes reactions and what receives the effects. With lots of practice, you would begin to spot with ease the Independent and Dependent variables in a research question/Hypothesis.
very interesting
Reply
this was helpful. thank you
This is the simplest and best explanation of variables and hypothesis. Thank you
Thank you for this explanation... easy to understand and explained concisely.
Yhis was really helpful thank you.
Thank you for this super simple explanation on variables
Truely, it is simple and useful.
It was really helpful. You broke it down in simple terms. Thanks
Really great. You made the explanations easy to digest. It was really helpful. Thank you. ~Xandy Umoh
This was really helpful. Thank you
Simple and understandable explanation
Very helpful.. thank you very much!
Thank you very much This was helpful
it is interesting and helpful
very helpful. so grateful and ell appreciated
Thank you It was helpful
Thank you so much for making this simple to understand!! Also to anyone reading this comment, please do not be like me and wait to do a research assignment until the last minute. Your future self will
idk why it cut off, but that last part meant to say: Your future self will thank you! :D
I am still not clear. so for underperforming faculty, who would be the variables? Assessing how community college deans manage underperforming faculty. Who would be the variables - independent and dep
So clear i love this example giving, am writtin my exam today ...
Very understandable and explicit. Thanks
Very helpful thank you so much
Very Helpful, with the aid of the examples i'i've got a point. Thank you
We carry a range of biosensors from the top hardware producers. All compatible with iMotions
Imotions for business.
Morten Pedersen
Consumer Insights
Publications
Explore the essential roles of independent and dependent variables in research. This guide delves into their definitions, significance in experiments, and their critical relationship. Learn how these variables are the foundation of research design, influencing hypothesis testing, theory development, and statistical analysis, empowering researchers to understand and predict outcomes of research studies.
Introduction.
At the very base of scientific inquiry and research design , variables act as the fundamental steps, guiding the rhythm and direction of research. This is particularly true in human behavior research, where the quest to understand the complexities of human actions and reactions hinges on the meticulous manipulation and observation of these variables. At the heart of this endeavor lie two different types of variables, namely: independent and dependent variables, whose roles and interplay are critical in scientific discovery.
Understanding the distinction between independent and dependent variables is not merely an academic exercise; it is essential for anyone venturing into the field of research. This article aims to demystify these concepts, offering clarity on their definitions, roles, and the nuances of their relationship in the study of human behavior, and in science generally. We will cover hypothesis testing and theory development, illuminating how these variables serve as the cornerstone of experimental design and statistical analysis.
The significance of grasping the difference between independent and dependent variables extends beyond the confines of academia. It empowers researchers to design robust studies, enables critical evaluation of research findings, and fosters an appreciation for the complexity of human behavior research. As we delve into this exploration, our objective is clear: to equip readers with a deep understanding of these fundamental concepts, enhancing their ability to contribute to the ever-evolving field of human behavior research.
In the realm of human behavior research, independent variables are the keystones around which studies are designed and hypotheses are tested. Independent variables are the factors or conditions that researchers manipulate or observe to examine their effects on dependent variables, which typically reflect aspects of human behavior or psychological phenomena. Understanding the role of independent variables is crucial for designing robust research methodologies, ensuring the reliability and validity of findings.
Independent variables are those variables that are changed or controlled in a scientific experiment to test the effects on dependent variables. In studies focusing on human behavior, these can range from psychological interventions (e.g., cognitive-behavioral therapy), environmental adjustments (e.g., noise levels, lighting, smells, etc), to societal factors (e.g., social media use). For example, in an experiment investigating the impact of sleep on cognitive performance, the amount of sleep participants receive is the independent variable.
Selecting an independent variable requires careful consideration of the research question and the theoretical framework guiding the study. Researchers must ensure that their chosen variable can be effectively, and consistently manipulated or measured and is ethically and practically feasible, particularly when dealing with human subjects.
Manipulating an independent variable involves creating different conditions (e.g., treatment vs. control groups) to observe how changes in the variable affect outcomes. For instance, researchers studying the effect of educational interventions on learning outcomes might vary the type of instructional material (digital vs. traditional) to assess differences in student performance.
Manipulating independent variables in human behavior research presents unique challenges. Ethical considerations are paramount, as interventions must not harm participants. For example, studies involving vulnerable populations or sensitive topics require rigorous ethical oversight to ensure that the manipulation of independent variables does not result in adverse effects.
Practical limitations also come into play, such as controlling for extraneous variables that could influence the outcomes. In the aforementioned example of sleep and cognitive performance, factors like caffeine consumption or stress levels could confound the results. Researchers employ various methodological strategies, such as random assignment and controlled environments, to mitigate these influences.
The dependent variable in human behavior research acts as a mirror, reflecting the outcomes or effects resulting from variations in the independent variable. It is the aspect of human experience or behavior that researchers aim to understand, predict, or change through their studies. This section explores how dependent variables are measured, the significance of their accurate measurement, and the inherent challenges in capturing the complexities of human behavior.
Dependent variables are the responses or outcomes that researchers measure in an experiment, expecting them to vary as a direct result of changes in the independent variable. In the context of human behavior research, dependent variables could include measures of emotional well-being, cognitive performance, social interactions, or any other aspect of human behavior influenced by the experimental manipulation. For instance, in a study examining the effect of exercise on stress levels, stress level would be the dependent variable, measured through various psychological assessments or physiological markers.
Measuring dependent variables in human behavior research involves a diverse array of methodologies, ranging from self-reported questionnaires and interviews to physiological measurements and behavioral observations. The choice of measurement tool depends on the nature of the dependent variable and the objectives of the study.
The reliability and validity of the measurement of dependent variables are critical to the integrity of human behavior research.
Ensuring reliability and validity often involves the use of established measurement instruments with proven track records, pilot testing new instruments, and applying rigorous statistical analyses to evaluate measurement properties.
Measuring human behavior presents challenges due to its complexity and the influence of multiple, often interrelated, variables. Researchers must contend with issues such as participant bias, environmental influences, and the subjective nature of many psychological constructs. Additionally, the dynamic nature of human behavior means that it can change over time, necessitating careful consideration of when and how measurements are taken.
Understanding the relationship between independent and dependent variables is at the core of research in human behavior. This relationship is what researchers aim to elucidate, whether they seek to explain, predict, or influence human actions and psychological states. This section explores the nature of this relationship, the means by which it is analyzed, and common misconceptions that may arise.
The relationship between independent and dependent variables can manifest in various forms—direct, indirect, linear, nonlinear, and may be moderated or mediated by other variables. At its most basic, this relationship is often conceptualized as cause and effect: the independent variable (the cause) influences the dependent variable (the effect). For instance, increased physical activity (independent variable) may lead to decreased stress levels (dependent variable).
Statistical analyses play a pivotal role in examining the relationship between independent and dependent variables. Techniques vary depending on the nature of the variables and the research design, ranging from simple correlation and regression analyses for quantifying the strength and form of relationships, to complex multivariate analyses for exploring relationships among multiple variables simultaneously.
A fundamental consideration in human behavior research is the distinction between causality and correlation. Causality implies that changes in the independent variable cause changes in the dependent variable. Correlation, on the other hand, indicates that two variables are related but does not establish a cause-effect relationship. Confounding variables may influence both, creating the appearance of a direct relationship where none exists. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurate interpretation of research findings.
The complexity of human behavior and the myriad factors that influence it often lead to challenges in interpreting the relationship between independent and dependent variables. Researchers must be wary of:
This exploration highlights the importance of understanding independent and dependent variables in human behavior research. Independent variables act as the initiating factors in experiments, influencing the observed behaviors, while dependent variables reflect the results of these influences, providing insights into human emotions and actions.
Ethical and practical challenges arise, especially in experiments involving human participants, necessitating careful consideration to respect participants’ well-being. The measurement of these variables is critical for testing theories and validating hypotheses, with their relationship offering potential insights into causality and correlation within human behavior.
Rigorous statistical analysis and cautious interpretation of findings are essential to avoid misconceptions. Overall, the study of these variables is fundamental to advancing human behavior research, guiding researchers towards deeper understanding and potential interventions to improve the human condition.
For Beginners and Intermediates
Last edited
About the author
See what is next in human behavior research
Follow our newsletter to get the latest insights and events send to your inbox.
You might also like these.
Product guides.
Case Stories
Explore Blog Categories
Collaboration, product news, research fundamentals, research insights, 🍪 use of cookies.
We are committed to protecting your privacy and only use cookies to improve the user experience.
Chose which third-party services that you will allow to drop cookies. You can always change your cookie settings via the Cookie Settings link in the footer of the website. For more information read our Privacy Policy.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Chittaranjan andrade.
1 Dept. of Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neurotoxicology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Students without prior research experience may not know how to conceptualize and design a study. This article explains how an understanding of the classification and operationalization of variables is the key to the process. Variables describe aspects of the sample that is under study; they are so called because they vary in value from subject to subject in the sample. Variables may be independent or dependent. Independent variables influence the value of other variables; dependent variables are influenced in value by other variables. A hypothesis states an expected relationship between variables. A significant relationship between an independent and dependent variable does not prove cause and effect; the relationship may partly or wholly be explained by one or more confounding variables. Variables need to be operationalized; that is, defined in a way that permits their accurate measurement. These and other concepts are explained with the help of clinically relevant examples.
This article explains the following concepts: Independent variables, dependent variables, confounding variables, operationalization of variables, and construction of hypotheses.
In any body of research, the subject of study requires to be described and understood. For example, if we wish to study predictors of response to antidepressant drugs (ADs) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), we might select patient age, sex, age at onset of MDD, number of previous episodes of depression, duration of current depressive episode, presence of psychotic symptoms, past history of response to ADs, and other patient and illness characteristics as potential predictors. These characteristics or descriptors are called variables. Whether or not the patient responds to AD treatment is also a variable. A solid understanding of variables is the cornerstone in the conceptualization and preparation of a research protocol, and in the framing of study hypotheses. This subject is presented in two parts. This article, Part 1, explains what independent and dependent variables are, how an understanding of these is important in framing hypotheses, and what operationalization of a variable entails.
Variables are defined as characteristics of the sample that are examined, measured, described, and interpreted. Variables are so called because they vary in value from subject to subject in the study. As an example, if we wish to examine the relationship between age and height in a sample of children, age and height are the variables of interest; their values vary from child to child. In the earlier example, patients vary in age, sex, duration of current depressive episode, and response to ADs. Variables are classified as dependent and independent variables and are usually analyzed as categorical or continuous variables.
Independent variables are defined as those the values of which influence other variables. For example, age, sex, current smoking, LDL cholesterol level, and blood pressure are independent variables because their values (e.g., greater age, positive for current smoking, and higher LDL cholesterol level) influence the risk of myocardial infarction. Dependent variables are defined as those the values of which are influenced by other variables. For example, the risk of myocardial infarction is a dependent variable the value of which is influenced by variables such as age, sex, current smoking, LDL cholesterol level, and blood pressure. The risk is higher in older persons, in men, in current smokers, and so on.
There may be a cause–effect relationship between independent and dependent variables. For example, consider a clinical trial with treatment (iron supplement vs placebo) as the independent variable and hemoglobin level as the dependent variable. In children with anemia, an iron supplement will raise the hemoglobin level to a greater extent than will placebo; this is a cause–effect relationship because iron is necessary for the synthesis of hemoglobin. However, consider the variables teeth and weight . An alien from outer space who has no knowledge of human physiology may study human children below the age of 5 years and find that, as the number of teeth increases, weight increases. Should the alien conclude that there is a cause–effect relationship here, and that growing teeth causes weight gain? No, because a third variable, age, is a confounding variable 1 – 3 that is responsible for both increase in the number of teeth and increase in weight. In general, therefore, it is more proper to state that independent variables are associated with variations in the values of the dependent variables rather than state that independent variables cause variations in the values of the dependent variables. For causality to be asserted, other criteria must be fulfilled; this is out of the scope of the present article, and interested readers may refer to Schunemann et al. 4
As a side note, here, whether a particular variable is independent or dependent will depend on the question that is being asked. For example, in a study of factors influencing patient satisfaction with outpatient department (OPD) services, patient satisfaction is the dependent variable. But, in a study of factors influencing OPD attendance at a hospital, OPD attendance is the dependent variable, and patient satisfaction is merely one of many possible independent variables that can influence OPD attendance.
Students must have a clear idea about what they want to study in order to conceptualize and frame a research protocol. The first matters that they need to address are “What are my research questions?” and “What are my hypotheses?” Both questions can be answered only after choosing the dependent variables and then the independent variables for study.
In the case of a student who is interested in studying predictors of AD outcomes in patients with MDD, treatment response is the dependent variable and patient and clinical characteristics are possible independent variables. So, the selection of dependent and independent variables helps defines the objectives of the study:
Note that in a formal research protocol, the student will need to state all the independent variables and not merely list examples. The student may also choose to include additional independent variables, such as baseline biochemical, psychophysiological, and neuroradiological measures.
A hypothesis is a clear statement of what the researcher expects to find in the study. As an example, a researcher may hypothesize that longer duration of current depression is associated with poorer response to ADs. In this hypothesis, the duration of the current episode of depression is the independent variable and treatment response is the dependent variable. It should be obvious, now, that a hypothesis can also be defined as the statement of an expected relationship between an independent and a dependent variable . Or, expressed visually, (independent variable) (arrow) (dependent variable) = hypothesis.
It would be a waste of time and energy to do a study to examine only one question: whether duration of current depression predicts treatment response. So, it is usual for research protocols to include many independent variables and many dependent variables in the generation of many hypotheses, as shown in Table 1 . Pairing each variable in the “independent variable” column with each variable in the “dependent variable” column would result in the generation of these hypotheses. Table 2 shows how this is done for age. Sets of hypotheses can likewise be constructed for the remaining independent and dependent variables in Table 1 . Importantly, the student must select one of these hypotheses as the primary hypothesis; the remaining hypotheses, no matter how many they are, would be secondary hypotheses. It is necessary to have only one hypothesis as the primary hypothesis in order to calculate the sample size necessary for an adequately powered study and to reduce the risk of false positive findings in the analysis. 5 In rare situations, two hypotheses may be considered equally important and may be stated as coprimary hypotheses.
Independent Variables and Dependent Variables in a Study on Sociodemographic and Clinical Prediction of Response of Major Depressive Disorder to Antidepressant Drug Treatment
• Age • Sex • Age at onset of major depressive disorder • Number of past episodes of depression • Past history of response to antidepressant drugs • Duration of current depressive episode • Baseline severity of depression • Baseline suicidality • Baseline melancholia • Baseline psychotic symptoms • Baseline soft neurological signs • Severity of depression • Global severity of illness • Subjective well-being • Quality of life • Everyday functioning |
Combinations of Age with Dependent Variables in the Generation of Hypotheses
1. Older age is associated with less attenuation in the severity of depression. 2. Older age is associated with less attenuation in the global severity of illness. 3. Older age is associated with less improvement in subjective well-being. 4. Older age is associated with less improvement in quality of life. 5. Older age is associated with less improvement in everyday functioning. |
In Table 1 , suicidality is listed as an independent variable and severity of depression, as a dependent variable. These variables need to be operationalized; that is, stated in a way that explains how they will be measured. Table 3 presents three ways in which suicidality can be measured and four ways in which (reduction in) the severity of depression can be measured. Now, each way of measurement in the “independent variable” column can be paired with a way of measurement in the “dependent variable” column, making a total of 12 possible hypotheses. In like manner, the many variables listed in Table 1 can each be operationalized in several different ways, resulting in the generation of a very large number of hypotheses. As already stated, the student must select only one hypothesis as the primary hypothesis.
Possible Ways of Operationalization of Suicidality and Depression
Independent Variable: Suicidality | Dependent Variable: Severity of Depression |
• Item score on the HAM-D • Item score on the MADRS • Beck scale for Suicide ideation total score | • MADRS total score • HAM-D total score • HAM-D response rate • HAM-D remission rate |
HAM-D: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, MADRS: Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale.
Much thought should be given to the operationalization of variables because variables that are carelessly operationalized will be poorly measured; the data collected will then be of poor quality, and the study will yield unreliable results. For example, socioeconomic status may be operationalized as lower, middle, or upper class, depending on the patient’s monthly income, on the total monthly income of the family, or using a validated socioeconomic status assessment scale that takes into consideration income, education, occupation, and place of residence. The student must choose the method that would best suit the needs of the study, and the method that has the greatest scientific acceptability. However, it is also permissible to operationalize the same variable in many different ways and to include all these different operationalizations in the study, as shown in Table 3 . This is because conceptualizing variables in different ways can help understand the subject of the study in different ways.
Operationalization of variables requires a consideration of the reliability and validity of the method of operationalization; discussions on reliability and validity are out of the scope of this article. Operationalization of variables also requires specification of the scale of measurement: nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio; this is also out of the scope of the present article. Finally, operationalization of variables can also specify details of the measurement procedure. As an example, in a study on the use of metformin to reduce olanzapine-associated weight gain, we may state that we will obtain the weight of the patient but fail to explain how we will do it. Better would be to state that the same weighing scale will be used. Still better would be to state that we will use a weighing instrument that works on the principle of moving weights on a levered arm, and that the same instrument will be used for all patients. And best would be to add that we will weigh patients, dressed in standard hospital gowns, after they have voided their bladder but before they have eaten breakfast. When the way in which a variable will be measured is defined, measurement of that variable becomes more objective and uniform
The next article, Part 2, will address what categorical and continuous variables are, why continuous variables should not be converted into categorical variables and when this rule can be broken, and what confounding variables are.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Independent and dependent variables in research, can qualitative data have independent and dependent variables.
Experiments rely on capturing the relationship between independent and dependent variables to understand causal patterns. Researchers can observe what happens when they change a condition in their experiment or if there is any effect at all.
It's important to understand the difference between the independent variable and dependent variable. We'll look at the notion of independent and dependent variables in this article. If you are conducting experimental research, defining the variables in your study is essential for realizing rigorous research .
In experimental research, a variable refers to the phenomenon, person, or thing that is being measured and observed by the researcher. A researcher conducts a study to see how one variable affects another and make assertions about the relationship between different variables.
A typical research question in an experimental study addresses a hypothesized relationship between the independent variable manipulated by the researcher and the dependent variable that is the outcome of interest presumably influenced by the researcher's manipulation.
Take a simple experiment on plants as an example. Suppose you have a control group of plants on one side of a garden and an experimental group of plants on the other side. All things such as sunlight, water, and fertilizer being equal, both plants should be expected to grow at the same rate.
Now imagine that the plants in the experimental group are given a new plant fertilizer under the assumption that they will grow faster. Then you will need to measure the difference in growth between the two groups in your study.
In this case, the independent variable is the type of fertilizer used on your plants while the dependent variable is the rate of growth among your plants. If there is a significant difference in growth between the two groups, then your study provides support to suggest that the fertilizer causes higher rates of plant growth.
The independent variable is the element in your study that you intentionally change, which is why it can also be referred to as the manipulated variable.
You manipulate this variable to see how it might affect the other variables you observe, all other factors being equal. This means that you can observe the cause and effect relationships between one independent variable and one or multiple dependent variables.
Independent variables are directly manipulated by the researcher, while dependent variables are not. They are "dependent" because they are affected by the independent variable in the experiment. Researchers can thus study how manipulating the independent variable leads to changes in the main outcome of interest being measured as the dependent variable.
Note that while you can have multiple dependent variables, it is challenging to establish research rigor for multiple independent variables. If you are making so many changes in an experiment, how do you know which change is responsible for the outcome produced by the study? Studying more than one independent variable would require running an experiment for each independent variable to isolate its effects on the dependent variable.
This being said, it is certainly possible to employ a study design that involves multiple independent and dependent variables, as is the case with what is called a factorial experiment. For example, a psychological study examining the effects of sleep and stress levels on work productivity and social interaction would have two independent variables and two dependent variables, respectively.
Such a study would be complex and require careful planning to establish the necessary research rigor , however. If possible, consider narrowing your research to the examination of one independent variable to make it more manageable and easier to understand.
Let's consider an experiment in the social studies. Suppose you want to determine the effectiveness of a new textbook compared to current textbooks in a particular school.
The new textbook is supposed to be better, but how can you prove it? Besides all the selling points that the textbook publisher makes, how do you know if the new textbook is any good? A rigorous study examining the effects of the textbook on classroom outcomes is in order.
The textbook given to students makes up the independent variable in your experimental study. The shift from the existing textbooks to the new one represents the manipulation of the independent variable in this study.
In any experiment, the dependent variable is observed to measure how it is affected by changes to the independent variable. Outcomes such as test scores and other performance metrics can make up the data for the dependent variable.
Now that we are changing the textbook in the experiment above, we should examine if there are any effects.
To do this, we will need two classrooms of students. As best as possible, the two sets of students should be of similar proficiency (or at least of similar backgrounds) and placed within similar conditions for teaching and learning (e.g., physical space, lesson planning).
The control group in our study will be one set of students using the existing textbook. By examining their performance, we can establish a baseline. The performance of the experimental group, which is the set of students using the new textbook, can then be compared with the baseline performance.
As a result, the change in the test scores make up the data for our dependent variable. We cannot directly affect how well students perform on the test, but we can conclude from our experiment whether the use of the new textbook might impact students' performance.
Rely on our powerful data analysis interface for your research, starting with a free trial.
We can typically think of an independent variable as something a researcher can directly change. In the above example, we can change the textbook used by the teacher in class. If we're talking about plants, we can change the fertilizer.
Conversely, the dependent variable is something that we do not directly influence or manipulate. Strictly speaking, we cannot directly manipulate a student's performance on a test or the rate of growth of a plant, not without other factors such as new teaching methods or new fertilizer, respectively.
Understanding the distinction between a dependent variable and an independent variable is key to experimental research. Ultimately, the distinction can be reduced to which element in a study has been directly influenced by the researcher.
Given the potential complexities encountered in research, there is essential terminology for other variables in any experimental study. You might employ this terminology or encounter them while reading other research.
A control variable is any factor that the researcher tries to keep constant as the independent variable changes. In the plant experiment described earlier in this article, the sunlight and water are each a controlled variable while the type of fertilizer used is the manipulated variable across control and experimental groups.
To ensure research rigor, the researcher needs to keep these control variables constant to dispel any concerns that differences in growth rate were being driven by sunlight or water, as opposed to the fertilizer being used.
Extraneous variables refer to any unwanted influence on the dependent variable that may confound the analysis of the study. For example, if bugs or animals ate the plants in your fertilizer study, this was greatly impact the rates of plant growth. This is why it would be important to control the environment and protect it from such threats.
Finally, independent variables can go by different names such as subject variables or predictor variables. Dependent variables can also be referred to as the responding variable or outcome variable. Whatever the language, they all serve the same role of influencing the dependent variable in an experiment.
The use of the word " variables " is typically associated with quantitative and confirmatory research. Naturalistic qualitative research typically does not employ experimental designs or establish causality. Qualitative research often draws on observations , interviews , focus groups , and other forms of data collection that are allow researchers to study the naturally occurring "messiness" of the social world, rather than controlling all variables to isolate a cause-and-effect relationship.
In limited circumstances, the idea of experimental variables can apply to participant observations in ethnography , where the researcher should be mindful of their influence on the environment they are observing.
However, the experimental paradigm is best left to quantitative studies and confirmatory research questions. Qualitative researchers in the social sciences are oftentimes more interested in observing and describing socially-constructed phenomena rather than testing hypotheses .
Nonetheless, the notion of independent and dependent variables does hold important lessons for qualitative researchers. Even if they don't employ variables in their study design, qualitative researchers often observe how one thing affects another. A theoretical or conceptual framework can then suggest potential cause-and-effect relationships in their study.
Download a free trial of ATLAS.ti to see how you can make the most of your data.
Last Updated: September 19, 2023 Fact Checked
This article was co-authored by Michael Simpson, PhD . Dr. Michael Simpson (Mike) is a Registered Professional Biologist in British Columbia, Canada. He has over 20 years of experience in ecology research and professional practice in Britain and North America, with an emphasis on plants and biological diversity. Mike also specializes in science communication and providing education and technical support for ecology projects. Mike received a BSc with honors in Ecology and an MA in Society, Science, and Nature from The University of Lancaster in England as well as a Ph.D. from the University of Alberta. He has worked in British, North American, and South American ecosystems, and with First Nations communities, non-profits, government, academia, and industry. There are 10 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 134,764 times.
Whether you’re conducting an experiment or learning algebra, understanding the relationship between independent and dependent variables is a valuable skill. Learning the difference between them can be tricky at first, but you’ll get the hang of it in no time.
Tip: When you encounter variables, plug them into this sentence: “ Independent variable causes Dependent Variable , but it isn't possible that Dependent Variable could cause Independent Variable .
For example: “A 5 mg dose of medication causes allergy relief, but it isn’t possible that allergy relief could cause a 5 mg dose of medication.”
wikiHow Tech Help Pro:
Level up your tech skills and stay ahead of the curve
What Are Independent and Dependent Variables?
Both the independent variable and dependent variable are examined in an experiment using the scientific method , so it's important to know what they are and how to use them.
In a scientific experiment, you'll ultimately be changing or controlling the independent variable and measuring the effect on the dependent variable. This distinction is critical in evaluating and proving hypotheses.
Below you'll find more about these two types of variables, along with examples of each in sample science experiments, and an explanation of how to graph them to help visualize your data.
An independent variable is the condition that you change in an experiment. In other words, it is the variable you control. It is called independent because its value does not depend on and is not affected by the state of any other variable in the experiment. Sometimes you may hear this variable called the "controlled variable" because it is the one that is changed. Do not confuse it with a control variable , which is a variable that is purposely held constant so that it can't affect the outcome of the experiment.
The dependent variable is the condition that you measure in an experiment. You are assessing how it responds to a change in the independent variable, so you can think of it as depending on the independent variable. Sometimes the dependent variable is called the "responding variable."
If you are having a hard time identifying which variable is the independent variable and which is the dependent variable, remember the dependent variable is the one affected by a change in the independent variable. If you write out the variables in a sentence that shows cause and effect, the independent variable causes the effect on the dependent variable. If you have the variables in the wrong order, the sentence won't make sense.
Independent variable causes an effect on the dependent variable.
Example : How long you sleep (independent variable) affects your test score (dependent variable).
This makes sense, but:
Example : Your test score affects how long you sleep.
This doesn't really make sense (unless you can't sleep because you are worried you failed a test, but that would be a different experiment).
There is a standard method for graphing independent and dependent variables. The x-axis is the independent variable, while the y-axis is the dependent variable. You can use the DRY MIX acronym to help remember how to graph variables:
D = dependent variable R = responding variable Y = graph on the vertical or y-axis
M = manipulated variable I = independent variable X = graph on the horizontal or x-axis
Test your understanding with the scientific method quiz .
How to recognize nurs study methodology: independent | dependent variables.
Variables are any characteristics in the study that can take on different values. The main difference between independent and dependent variables is cause and effect. The independent variable is not expected to be impacted by the study (it's independent), but to cause the difference in the dependent variable. The dependent variable is the effect. The dependent variable expected to change because of the independent variable (it depends on the other factors involved).
Is this a variable that the researchers deliberately introduced or that would have occurred regardless of the study?
The independent variable is the cause, not the effect. So if researchers introduce something in the experiment, like an intervention, that's the independent variable. For observational studies, the independent variable is what was already present in the patients before the outcome that's being measured.
An observational study wants to know if patients who worked high stress jobs had more strokes. Having a high stress job is the independent variable. It's not really the variable that's being measured. It's the variable that may or may not cause strokes.
An experimental study wants to know if training soccer players on knee stability exercises reduces the number of injuries in a season. The knee stability training is the independent variable. Here, the researchers deliberately introduced training on knee stability exercises. It's not what they want to measure; they want to measure injuries. But this variable that they've introduced is what may or may not cause a reduction in injuries.
Is this the variable that is being studied/measured?
The easiest way to know what is the dependent variable is to look at what the study is trying to measure. That's the dependent variable, it's what the researchers expect will be impacted by other factors in the study, it's the factor that they're wanting to measure.
If this is an experimental study, is this the variable that would be impacted by the intervention?
The dependent variable depends on the other variables. It is the thing that will be affected by the other variables in the study.
An observational study wants to know if patients who worked high stress jobs had more strokes. Having or not having a stroke is the dependent variable.
An experimental study wants to know if training soccer players on knee stability exercises reduces the number of injuries in a season. The number of injuries in the season is the dependent variable.
Need Research Assistance? Get Help
Sat / act prep online guides and tips, independent and dependent variables: which is which.
General Education
Independent and dependent variables are important for both math and science. If you don't understand what these two variables are and how they differ, you'll struggle to analyze an experiment or plot equations. Fortunately, we make learning these concepts easy!
In this guide, we break down what independent and dependent variables are , give examples of the variables in actual experiments, explain how to properly graph them, provide a quiz to test your skills, and discuss the one other important variable you need to know.
A variable is something you're trying to measure. It can be practically anything, such as objects, amounts of time, feelings, events, or ideas. If you're studying how people feel about different television shows, the variables in that experiment are television shows and feelings. If you're studying how different types of fertilizer affect how tall plants grow, the variables are type of fertilizer and plant height.
There are two key variables in every experiment: the independent variable and the dependent variable.
Independent variable: What the scientist changes or what changes on its own.
Dependent variable: What is being studied/measured.
The independent variable (sometimes known as the manipulated variable) is the variable whose change isn't affected by any other variable in the experiment. Either the scientist has to change the independent variable herself or it changes on its own; nothing else in the experiment affects or changes it. Two examples of common independent variables are age and time. There's nothing you or anything else can do to speed up or slow down time or increase or decrease age. They're independent of everything else.
The dependent variable (sometimes known as the responding variable) is what is being studied and measured in the experiment. It's what changes as a result of the changes to the independent variable. An example of a dependent variable is how tall you are at different ages. The dependent variable (height) depends on the independent variable (age).
An easy way to think of independent and dependent variables is, when you're conducting an experiment, the independent variable is what you change, and the dependent variable is what changes because of that. You can also think of the independent variable as the cause and the dependent variable as the effect.
It can be a lot easier to understand the differences between these two variables with examples, so let's look at some sample experiments below.
Below are overviews of three experiments, each with their independent and dependent variables identified.
Experiment 1: You want to figure out which brand of microwave popcorn pops the most kernels so you can get the most value for your money. You test different brands of popcorn to see which bag pops the most popcorn kernels.
Experiment 2 : You want to see which type of fertilizer helps plants grow fastest, so you add a different brand of fertilizer to each plant and see how tall they grow.
Experiment 3: You're interested in how rising sea temperatures impact algae life, so you design an experiment that measures the number of algae in a sample of water taken from a specific ocean site under varying temperatures.
For each of the independent variables above, it's clear that they can't be changed by other variables in the experiment. You have to be the one to change the popcorn and fertilizer brands in Experiments 1 and 2, and the ocean temperature in Experiment 3 cannot be significantly changed by other factors. Changes to each of these independent variables cause the dependent variables to change in the experiments.
Independent and dependent variables always go on the same places in a graph. This makes it easy for you to quickly see which variable is independent and which is dependent when looking at a graph or chart. The independent variable always goes on the x-axis, or the horizontal axis. The dependent variable goes on the y-axis, or vertical axis.
Here's an example:
As you can see, this is a graph showing how the number of hours a student studies affects the score she got on an exam. From the graph, it looks like studying up to six hours helped her raise her score, but as she studied more than that her score dropped slightly.
The amount of time studied is the independent variable, because it's what she changed, so it's on the x-axis. The score she got on the exam is the dependent variable, because it's what changed as a result of the independent variable, and it's on the y-axis. It's common to put the units in parentheses next to the axis titles, which this graph does.
There are different ways to title a graph, but a common way is "[Independent Variable] vs. [Dependent Variable]" like this graph. Using a standard title like that also makes it easy for others to see what your independent and dependent variables are.
Independent and dependent variables are the two most important variables to know and understand when conducting or studying an experiment, but there is one other type of variable that you should be aware of: constant variables.
Constant variables (also known as "constants") are simple to understand: they're what stay the same during the experiment. Most experiments usually only have one independent variable and one dependent variable, but they will all have multiple constant variables.
For example, in Experiment 2 above, some of the constant variables would be the type of plant being grown, the amount of fertilizer each plant is given, the amount of water each plant is given, when each plant is given fertilizer and water, the amount of sunlight the plants receive, the size of the container each plant is grown in, and more. The scientist is changing the type of fertilizer each plant gets which in turn changes how much each plant grows, but every other part of the experiment stays the same.
In experiments, you have to test one independent variable at a time in order to accurately understand how it impacts the dependent variable. Constant variables are important because they ensure that the dependent variable is changing because, and only because, of the independent variable so you can accurately measure the relationship between the dependent and independent variables.
If you didn't have any constant variables, you wouldn't be able to tell if the independent variable was what was really affecting the dependent variable. For example, in the example above, if there were no constants and you used different amounts of water, different types of plants, different amounts of fertilizer and put the plants in windows that got different amounts of sun, you wouldn't be able to say how fertilizer type affected plant growth because there would be so many other factors potentially affecting how the plants grew.
If you're still having a hard time understanding the relationship between independent and dependent variable, it might help to see them in action. Here are three experiments you can try at home.
One simple way to explore independent and dependent variables is to construct a biology experiment with seeds. Try growing some sunflowers and see how different factors affect their growth. For example, say you have ten sunflower seedlings, and you decide to give each a different amount of water each day to see if that affects their growth. The independent variable here would be the amount of water you give the plants, and the dependent variable is how tall the sunflowers grow.
Explore a wide range of chemical reactions with this chemistry kit . It includes 100+ ideas for experiments—pick one that interests you and analyze what the different variables are in the experiment!
Build and test a range of simple and complex machines with this K'nex kit . How does increasing a vehicle's mass affect its velocity? Can you lift more with a fixed or movable pulley? Remember, the independent variable is what you control/change, and the dependent variable is what changes because of that.
Can you identify the independent and dependent variables for each of the four scenarios below? The answers are at the bottom of the guide for you to check your work.
Scenario 1: You buy your dog multiple brands of food to see which one is her favorite.
Scenario 2: Your friends invite you to a party, and you decide to attend, but you're worried that staying out too long will affect how well you do on your geometry test tomorrow morning.
Scenario 3: Your dentist appointment will take 30 minutes from start to finish, but that doesn't include waiting in the lounge before you're called in. The total amount of time you spend in the dentist's office is the amount of time you wait before your appointment, plus the 30 minutes of the actual appointment
Scenario 4: You regularly babysit your little cousin who always throws a tantrum when he's asked to eat his vegetables. Over the course of the week, you ask him to eat vegetables four times.
Knowing the independent variable definition and dependent variable definition is key to understanding how experiments work. The independent variable is what you change, and the dependent variable is what changes as a result of that. You can also think of the independent variable as the cause and the dependent variable as the effect.
When graphing these variables, the independent variable should go on the x-axis (the horizontal axis), and the dependent variable goes on the y-axis (vertical axis).
Constant variables are also important to understand. They are what stay the same throughout the experiment so you can accurately measure the impact of the independent variable on the dependent variable.
Independent and dependent variables are commonly taught in high school science classes. Read our guide to learn which science classes high school students should be taking.
Scoring well on standardized tests is an important part of having a strong college application. Check out our guides on the best study tips for the SAT and ACT.
Interested in science? Science Olympiad is a great extracurricular to include on your college applications, and it can help you win big scholarships. Check out our complete guide to winning Science Olympiad competitions.
Quiz Answers
1: Independent: dog food brands; Dependent: how much you dog eats
2: Independent: how long you spend at the party; Dependent: your exam score
3: Independent: Amount of time you spend waiting; Dependent: Total time you're at the dentist (the 30 minutes of appointment time is the constant)
4: Independent: Number of times your cousin is asked to eat vegetables; Dependent: number of tantrums
These recommendations are based solely on our knowledge and experience. If you purchase an item through one of our links, PrepScholar may receive a commission.
Christine graduated from Michigan State University with degrees in Environmental Biology and Geography and received her Master's from Duke University. In high school she scored in the 99th percentile on the SAT and was named a National Merit Finalist. She has taught English and biology in several countries.
Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply!
The 5 Strategies You Must Be Using to Improve 160+ SAT Points
How to Get a Perfect 1600, by a Perfect Scorer
Score 800 on SAT Math
Score 800 on SAT Reading
Score 800 on SAT Writing
Score 600 on SAT Math
Score 600 on SAT Reading
Score 600 on SAT Writing
Free Complete Official SAT Practice Tests
What SAT Target Score Should You Be Aiming For?
15 Strategies to Improve Your SAT Essay
The 5 Strategies You Must Be Using to Improve 4+ ACT Points
How to Get a Perfect 36 ACT, by a Perfect Scorer
36 on ACT English
36 on ACT Math
36 on ACT Reading
36 on ACT Science
24 on ACT English
24 on ACT Math
24 on ACT Reading
24 on ACT Science
What ACT target score should you be aiming for?
ACT Vocabulary You Must Know
ACT Writing: 15 Tips to Raise Your Essay Score
How to Get Into Harvard and the Ivy League
How to Get a Perfect 4.0 GPA
How to Write an Amazing College Essay
What Exactly Are Colleges Looking For?
Is the ACT easier than the SAT? A Comprehensive Guide
Should you retake your SAT or ACT?
When should you take the SAT or ACT?
Stay Informed
Get the latest articles and test prep tips!
Check out our top-rated graduate blogs here:
GRE Online Prep Blog
GMAT Online Prep Blog
TOEFL Online Prep Blog
Holly R. "I am absolutely overjoyed and cannot thank you enough for helping me!”
Uw-madison libraries research guides.
In an experiment, the independent variable is the variable that is varied or manipulated by the researcher.
The dependent variable is the response that is measured.
For example:
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Nature Human Behaviour ( 2024 ) Cite this article
1179 Accesses
456 Altmetric
Metrics details
Mental well-being relates to multitudinous lifestyle behaviours and morbidities and underpins healthy aging. Thus far, causal evidence on whether and in what pattern mental well-being impacts healthy aging and the underlying mediating pathways is unknown. Applying genetic instruments of the well-being spectrum and its four dimensions including life satisfaction, positive affect, neuroticism and depressive symptoms ( n = 80,852 to 2,370,390), we performed two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses to estimate the causal effect of mental well-being on the genetically independent phenotype of aging (aging-GIP), a robust and representative aging phenotype, and its components including resilience, self-rated health, healthspan, parental lifespan and longevity ( n = 36,745 to 1,012,240). Analyses were adjusted for income, education and occupation. All the data were from the largest available genome-wide association studies in populations of European descent. Better mental well-being spectrum (each one Z -score higher) was causally associated with a higher aging-GIP ( β [95% confidence interval (CI)] in different models ranging from 1.00 [0.82–1.18] to 1.07 [0.91–1.24] standard deviations (s.d.)) independent of socioeconomic indicators. Similar association patterns were seen for resilience ( β [95% CI] ranging from 0.97 [0.82–1.12] to 1.04 [0.91–1.17] s.d.), self-rated health (0.61 [0.43–0.79] to 0.76 [0.59–0.93] points), healthspan (odds ratio [95% CI] ranging from 1.23 [1.02–1.48] to 1.35 [1.11–1.65]) and parental lifespan (1.77 [0.010–3.54] to 2.95 [1.13–4.76] years). Two-step Mendelian randomization mediation analyses identified 33 out of 106 candidates as mediators between the well-being spectrum and the aging-GIP: mainly lifestyles (for example, TV watching and smoking), behaviours (for example, medication use) and diseases (for example, heart failure, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, stroke, coronary atherosclerosis and ischaemic heart disease), each exhibiting a mediation proportion of >5%. These findings underscore the importance of mental well-being in promoting healthy aging and inform preventive targets for bridging aging disparities attributable to suboptimal mental health.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
24,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
111,21 € per year
only 9,27 € per issue
Buy this article
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Data availability.
All GWAS summary statistics analysed in this study are publicly available as shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1 for download by qualified researchers. The GWAS data for mental well-being traits can be obtained from the GWAS catalogue 38 ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/publications/30643256 ). The GWAS data for aging phenotypes can be retrieved or requested from the study authors at https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/2972 (the aging-GIP 14 ), https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9204998.v3 (frailty index 42 ), http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/gwas/summary_statistics/GCST006001-GCST007000/GCST006620 (self-rated health 43 ), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1302861 (healthspan 44 ), https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/2463 (parental lifespan 45 ) and https://www.longevitygenomics.org/downloads (longevity 46 ). All data generated in this study are included in the Supplementary Information .
All the MR analyses were conducted using R packages TwoSampleMR (version 0.5.7), MVMR (version 0.4), MRPRESSO (version 1.0) and MRlap (version 0.0.3.0) in R software (version 4.3.1). Custom code that supports the findings of this study is available at https://github.com/yechaojie/mental_aging .
Oeppen, J. & Vaupel, J. W. Demography. Broken limits to life expectancy. Science 296 , 1029–1031 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ageing: a 21st century public health challenge? Lancet Public Health 2 , e297 (2017).
Garmany, A., Yamada, S. & Terzic, A. Longevity leap: mind the healthspan gap. NPJ Regen. Med. 6 , 57 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mental health: strengthening our response. World Health Organization https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response (17 June 2022).
Prince, M. et al. No health without mental health. Lancet 370 , 859–877 (2007).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Mak, H. W. et al. Hobby engagement and mental wellbeing among people aged 65 years and older in 16 countries. Nat. Med. 29 , 2233–2240 (2023).
Steptoe, A. et al. Subjective wellbeing, health and ageing. Lancet 385 , 640–648 (2015).
Jacobs, J. M. et al. Optimism and longevity beyond age 85. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 76 , 1806–1813 (2021).
Santamaria-Garcia, H. et al. Factors associated with healthy aging in Latin American populations. Nat. Med. 29 , 2248–2258 (2023).
Sekula, P., Del Greco M, F., Pattaro, C. & Köttgen, A. Mendelian randomization as an approach to assess causality using observational data. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 27 , 3253–3265 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Killingsworth, M. A., Kahneman, D. & Mellers, B. Income and emotional well-being: a conflict resolved. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120 , e2208661120 (2023).
Ridley, M., Rao, G., Schilbach, F. & Patel, V. Poverty, depression, and anxiety: causal evidence and mechanisms. Science 370 , eaay0214 (2020).
Ye, C. J. et al. Mendelian randomization evidence for the causal effects of socio-economic inequality on human longevity among Europeans. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7 , 1357–1370 (2023).
Timmers, P. R. H. J. et al. Mendelian randomization of genetically independent aging phenotypes identifies LPA and VCAM1 as biological targets for human aging. Nat. Aging 2 , 19–30 (2022).
Rosoff, D. B. et al. Multivariate genome-wide analysis of aging-related traits identifies novel loci and new drug targets for healthy aging. Nat. Aging 3 , 1020–1035 (2023).
Emdin, C. A., Khera, A. V. & Kathiresan, S. Mendelian randomization. JAMA 318 , 1925–1926 (2017).
Carter, A. R. et al. Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 36 , 465–478 (2021).
Killingsworth, M. A. Experienced well-being rises with income, even above $75,000 per year. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118 , e2016976118 (2021).
Krieger, N., Williams, D. R. & Moss, N. E. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu. Rev. Public Health 18 , 341–378 (1997).
Khan, I. et al. Surrogate adiposity markers and mortality. JAMA Netw. Open 6 , e2334836 (2023).
Johnson, A. A. & Stolzing, A. The role of lipid metabolism in aging, lifespan regulation, and age-related disease. Aging Cell 18 , e13048 (2019).
Ye, C. et al. Causal associations of sarcopenia-related traits with cardiometabolic disease and Alzheimer’s disease and the mediating role of insulin resistance: a Mendelian randomization study. Aging Cell 22 , e13923 (2023).
Furman, D. et al. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nat. Med. 25 , 1822–1832 (2019).
Yusuf, S. et al. Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet 395 , 795–808 (2020).
Levine, G. N. et al. Psychological health, well-being, and the mind-heart-body connection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 143 , e763–e783 (2021).
Dalsgaard, S., Østergaard, S. D., Leckman, J. F., Mortensen, P. B. & Pedersen, M. G. Mortality in children, adolescents, and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a nationwide cohort study. Lancet 385 , 2190–2196 (2015).
Sun, S. et al. Association of psychiatric comorbidity with the risk of premature death among children and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. JAMA Psychiatry 76 , 1141–1149 (2019).
GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392 , 1736–1788 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Robson, D. & Gray, R. Serious mental illness and physical health problems: a discussion paper. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 44 , 457–466 (2007).
Wang, Y. et al. Independent associations of education, intelligence, and cognition with hypertension and the mediating effects of cardiometabolic risk factors: a mendelian randomization study. Hypertension 80 , 192–203 (2023).
Sturgeon, J. A., Finan, P. H. & Zautra, A. J. Affective disturbance in rheumatoid arthritis: psychological and disease-related pathways. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 12 , 532–542 (2016).
Wu, X. et al. Investigating the relationship between depression and breast cancer: observational and genetic analyses. BMC Med. 21 , 170 (2023).
Dockray, S. & Steptoe, A. Positive affect and psychobiological processes. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35 , 69–75 (2010).
Zhao, W. et al. Identification of new susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes and shared etiological pathways with coronary heart disease. Nat. Genet. 49 , 1450–1457 (2017).
Carreras-Torres, R. et al. Role of obesity in smoking behaviour: Mendelian randomisation study in UK Biobank. Br. Med. J. 361 , k1767 (2018).
Klimentidis, Y. C. et al. Genome-wide association study of habitual physical activity in over 377,000 UK Biobank participants identifies multiple variants including CADM2 and APOE. Int. J. Obes. 42 , 1161–1176 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Skrivankova, V. W. et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR Statement. JAMA 326 , 1614–1621 (2021).
Baselmans, B. M. L. et al. Multivariate genome-wide analyses of the well-being spectrum. Nat. Genet. 51 , 445–451 (2019).
Lee, J. J. et al. Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals. Nat. Genet. 50 , 1112–1121 (2018).
Mitchell, R. E. et al. MRC IEU UK Biobank GWAS Pipeline Version 2. University of Bristol https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.pnoat8cxo0u52p6ynfaekeigi (2019).
Ko, H. et al. Genome-wide association study of occupational attainment as a proxy for cognitive reserve. Brain 145 , 1436–1448 (2022).
Atkins, J. L. et al. A genome-wide association study of the frailty index highlights brain pathways in ageing. Aging Cell 20 , e13459 (2021).
Harris, S. E. et al. Molecular genetic contributions to self-rated health. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46 , 994–1009 (2017).
PubMed Google Scholar
Zenin, A. et al. Identification of 12 genetic loci associated with human healthspan. Commun. Biol. 2 , 41 (2019).
Timmers, P. R. et al. Genomics of 1 million parent lifespans implicates novel pathways and common diseases and distinguishes survival chances. eLife 8 , e39856 (2019).
Deelen, J. et al. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies multiple longevity genes. Nat. Commun. 10 , 3669 (2019).
1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526 , 68–74 (2015).
International HapMap 3 Consortium et al. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature 467 , 52–58 (2010).
Machiela, M. J. & Chanock, S. J. LDlink: a web-based application for exploring population-specific haplotype structure and linking correlated alleles of possible functional variants. Bioinformatics 31 , 3555–3557 (2015).
Bowden, J. et al. A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization. Stat. Med. 36 , 1783–1802 (2017).
Grant, A. J. & Burgess, S. Pleiotropy robust methods for multivariable Mendelian randomization. Stat. Med. 40 , 5813–5830 (2021).
Burgess, S. et al. Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations: update for summer 2023. Wellcome Open Res. 4 , 186 (2023).
Burgess, S., Davies, N. M. & Thompson, S. G. Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization. Genet. Epidemiol. 40 , 597–608 (2016).
Mounier, N. & Kutalik, Z. Bias correction for inverse variance weighting Mendelian randomization. Genet. Epidemiol. 47 , 314–331 (2023).
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G. & Sheets, V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol. Methods 7 , 83–104 (2002).
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P. C. & Burgess, S. Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet. Epidemiol. 40 , 304–314 (2016).
Hartwig, F. P., Davey Smith, G. & Bowden, J. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46 , 1985–1998 (2017).
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G. & Burgess, S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int. J. Epidemiol. 44 , 512–525 (2015).
Verbanck, M., Chen, C. Y., Neale, B. & Do, R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat. Genet. 50 , 693–698 (2018).
Burgess, S. & Thompson, S. G. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects. Am. J. Epidemiol. 181 , 251–260 (2015).
Glickman, M. E., Rao, S. R. & Schultz, M. R. False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 67 , 850–857 (2014).
Download references
This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82370820, 82088102, 91857205, 823B2014 and 81930021), the ‘Shanghai Municipal Education Commission–Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support’ from Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (20171901 Round 2), and the Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. The authors are grateful to the participants of all the GWASs used in this manuscript and the investigators who made these GWAS data publicly available.
These authors contributed equally: Chao-Jie Ye, Dong Liu, Ming-Ling Chen.
Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Chao-Jie Ye, Dong Liu, Ming-Ling Chen, Li-Jie Kong, Chun Dou, Yi-Ying Wang, Min Xu, Yu Xu, Mian Li, Zhi-Yun Zhao, Rui-Zhi Zheng, Jie Zheng, Jie-Li Lu, Yu-Hong Chen, Guang Ning, Wei-Qing Wang, Yu-Fang Bi & Tian-Ge Wang
Shanghai National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory for Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases of the National Health Commission of the PR China, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Endocrine Tumor, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
C.-J.Y. and T.-G.W. contributed to the conception and design of the study. C.-J.Y. performed statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. T.-G.W. critically revised the manuscript. D.L., M.-L.C. and T.-G.W. checked the statistical analysis and proofread the manuscript. T.-G.W., G.N., W.-Q.W. and C.-J.Y. obtained funding. All authors contributed to the acquisition or interpretation of data, proofreading of the manuscript for important intellectual content and the final approval of the version to be published. T.-G.W. is the guarantor of this work and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Correspondence to Wei-Qing Wang , Yu-Fang Bi or Tian-Ge Wang .
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information.
Nature Human Behaviour thanks Taiji Noguchi, Yongfu Yu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information.
Supplementary Methods 1 and 2 and Tables 1–19.
Rights and permissions.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Ye, CJ., Liu, D., Chen, ML. et al. Mendelian randomization evidence for the causal effect of mental well-being on healthy aging. Nat Hum Behav (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01905-9
Download citation
Received : 08 December 2023
Accepted : 30 April 2024
Published : 17 June 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01905-9
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Here is a simple rule that you can apply at all times: the independent variable is what a researcher changes, whereas the dependent variable is affected by these changes. To illustrate the difference, a number of examples are provided below. The purpose of Study 1 is to measure the impact of different plant fertilizers on how many fruits apple ...
The independent variable is the cause. Its value is independent of other variables in your study. The dependent variable is the effect. Its value depends on changes in the independent variable. Example: Independent and dependent variables. You design a study to test whether changes in room temperature have an effect on math test scores.
Designation of the dependent and independent variable involves unpacking the research problem in a way that identifies a general cause and effect and classifying these variables as either independent or dependent. The variables should be outlined in the introduction of your paper and explained in more detail in the methods section. There are no ...
A: A variable is anything that the study is measuring. Read through your source looking for the following characteristics or keywords to identify the dependent and independent variable in your study. Dependent variables: • Dependent variables depend on other variables. For example, if someone was studying the effects of pollution on asthma ...
While the independent variable is the " cause ", the dependent variable is the " effect " - or rather, the affected variable. In other words, the dependent variable is the variable that is assumed to change as a result of a change in the independent variable. Keeping with the previous example, let's look at some dependent variables ...
Here are several examples of independent and dependent variables in experiments: In a study to determine whether how long a student sleeps affects test scores, the independent variable is the length of time spent sleeping while the dependent variable is the test score. You want to know which brand of fertilizer is best for your plants.
In research, the independent variable is manipulated to observe its effect, while the dependent variable is the measured outcome. Essentially, the independent variable is the presumed cause, and the dependent variable is the observed effect. Variables provide the foundation for examining relationships, drawing conclusions, and making ...
The independent variable is the cause and the dependent variable is the effect, that is, independent variables influence dependent variables. In research, a dependent variable is the outcome of interest of the study and the independent variable is the factor that may influence the outcome. Let's explain this with an independent and dependent ...
Definition: Independent variable is a variable that is manipulated or changed by the researcher to observe its effect on the dependent variable. It is also known as the predictor variable or explanatory variable. The independent variable is the presumed cause in an experiment or study, while the dependent variable is the presumed effect or outcome.
Independent and Dependent Variables, Explained With Examples. In experiments that test cause and effect, two types of variables come into play. One is an independent variable and the other is a dependent variable, and together they play an integral role in research design.
To identify Independent research variables, look for items in your research question or hypothesis that manipulates, causes or influences something or a reaction. To identify Dependent research variables, look for items in your research question or hypothesis that sees the result, effect or outcome of changing the independent variable. Some ...
The relationship between independent and dependent variables can manifest in various forms—direct, indirect, linear, nonlinear, and may be moderated or mediated by other variables. At its most basic, this relationship is often conceptualized as cause and effect: the independent variable (the cause) influences the dependent variable (the effect).
So, it is usual for research protocols to include many independent variables and many dependent variables in the generation of many hypotheses, as shown in Table 1. Pairing each variable in the "independent variable" column with each variable in the "dependent variable" column would result in the generation of these hypotheses.
Variables are an important concept in experimental and hypothesis-testing research, so understanding independent/dependent variables is key to understanding research design. In this article, we will talk about what separates a dependent variable from an independent variable and how the concept applies to research.
1. Create a graph with x and y-axes. Draw a vertical line, which is the y-axis. Then make the x-axis, or a horizontal line that goes from the bottom of the y-axis to the right. The y-axis represents a dependent variable, while the x-axis represents an independent variable. [11]
The independent variable in your experiment would be the brand of paper towels. The dependent variable would be the amount of liquid absorbed by the paper towel. In an experiment to determine how far people can see into the infrared part of the spectrum, the wavelength of light is the independent variable and whether the light is observed (the ...
So, it is usual for research protocols to include many independent variables and many dependent variables in the generation of many hypotheses, as shown in Table 1. Pairing each variable in the "independent variable" column with each variable in the "dependent variable" column would result in the generation of these hypotheses.
This article begins by defining the term variable and the terms independent variable and dependent variable, providing examples of each. It then proceeds to describe and discuss synonyms for the terms independent variable and dependent variable, including treatment, intervention, predictor, and risk factor, and synonyms for dependent variable, such as response variables and outcomes.
Types of Research within Qualitative and Quantitative ; Differences Between Quantitative and Qualitative Research ; Building an Evidence Table ... EndNote Tutorials This link opens in a new window; Definitions. In an experiment, the independent variable is the variable that is varied or manipulated by the researcher. The dependent variable is ...
Having a high stress job is the independent variable. It's not really the variable that's being measured. It's the variable that may or may not cause strokes. An experimental study wants to know if training soccer players on knee stability exercises reduces the number of injuries in a season. The knee stability training is the independent variable.
The number of hours the student studies is the independent variable because nothing directly affects the number of study hours. The grade the student earns in the class is the dependent variable because how much time the student commits to preparing can affect the grade. Related: 23 Research Databases for Professional and Academic Use.
There are two key variables in every experiment: the independent variable and the dependent variable. Independent variable: What the scientist changes or what changes on its own. Dependent variable: What is being studied/measured. The independent variable (sometimes known as the manipulated variable) is the variable whose change isn't affected ...
The dependent variable is the response that is measured. For example: In a study of how different doses of a drug affect the severity of symptoms, a researcher could compare the frequency and intensity of symptoms when different doses are administered.
Ye et al. find a positive causal effect of mental well-being on healthy aging, independent of socioeconomic status. This work underscores the imperative to prioritize mental well-being in health ...