Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
- We're Hiring!
- Help Center
![makalah problem solving and decision making paper cover thumbnail](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/56363254/mini_magick20190112-2619-1c4pzi0.png?1547313348)
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Problem Solving & Decision Making
![makalah problem solving and decision making Profile image of Agustina Masito](https://a.academia-assets.com/images/s65_no_pic.png)
Related Papers
Ignatia Yohana Rembet
![makalah problem solving and decision making makalah problem solving and decision making](https://a.academia-assets.com/images/loswp/related-pdf-icon.png)
DWI WAHYU AGUSTIAR
just a simple and basic theory of decision making process , that can lead you to have a little bit advantage.
Yogie Thalim
nindya novenia
Perencanaan telah dikenali sebagai fungsi pertama atau langkah dalam pengelolaan dan berlaku di semua tingkat manajemen. Ia juga mendefinisikan sebuah organisasi ' s tujuan dan menetapkan sebuah proses untuk menentukan bagaimana sistem manajemen akan mencapai tujuan-tujuannya, bagaimana ia akan mendapatkan di mana ia ingin pergi. Tujuan perencanaan adalah untuk membantu organisasi mencapai tujuan mereka. Umumnya berbicara-ing, semakin tinggi tingkat manajemen, semakin banyak waktu dalam perencanaan formal activi-hubungan. Perencanaan formal dilakukan pada siklus waktu reguler oleh sekelompok orang yang bekerja togethe r. perawatan kesehatan perencanaan pelayanan makanan dirancang untuk mendukung tujuan atau misi organisasi, memenuhi kebutuhan pelanggan, dan menyediakan untuk penggunaan yang efisien dan efektif dari sumber daya departemen. Perencanaan menetapkan kerangka kerja yang pembuatan manajemen fungsi-keputusan lainnya, pengorganisasian, staffing, memimpin, dan mengendalikan-dapat dicapai. Perencanaan berlaku untuk kegiatan yang beragam di departemen pelayanan makanan dan bervariasi dalam kompleksitas dari menulis rencana bisnis tahunan untuk mempersiapkan menu sehari-hari atau jadwal kerja. manajer pelayanan makanan mungkin diperlukan untuk merencanakan atau membantu merencanakan sejumlah agenda organisasi. Beberapa di antaranya adalah • tujuan tahunan sebagai bagian dari lembaga ' s rencana bisnis •
dinda septiasa
Nisa Asyifa
zelaz zaliez
riyanto turhin , Ludwig Suparmo
sewaktu-waktu terjadi terpaan issue karena adanya risiko bisnis
Johnson Dongoran
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Decision Making vs. Problem Solving
What's the difference.
Decision making and problem solving are two closely related concepts that are essential in both personal and professional settings. While decision making refers to the process of selecting the best course of action among various alternatives, problem solving involves identifying and resolving issues or obstacles that hinder progress towards a desired outcome. Decision making often involves evaluating different options based on their potential outcomes and consequences, while problem solving requires analyzing the root causes of a problem and developing effective strategies to overcome it. Both skills require critical thinking, creativity, and the ability to weigh pros and cons. Ultimately, decision making and problem solving are interconnected and complementary processes that enable individuals to navigate complex situations and achieve desired goals.
Attribute | Decision Making | Problem Solving |
---|---|---|
Definition | The process of selecting the best course of action among available alternatives. | The process of finding solutions to complex or difficult issues or challenges. |
Goal | To make a choice that leads to a desired outcome or solution. | To find a solution or resolution to a specific problem or challenge. |
Approach | Based on evaluating options and making a rational decision. | Based on analyzing the problem, identifying possible solutions, and selecting the most appropriate one. |
Process | Includes gathering information, evaluating alternatives, and making a decision. | Includes problem identification, analysis, generating solutions, and implementing the chosen solution. |
Focus | Primarily on making choices among available alternatives. | Primarily on finding solutions to specific problems or challenges. |
Timeframe | Can be short-term or long-term decision making. | Can be short-term or long-term problem solving. |
Complexity | Can involve complex decision-making models and frameworks. | Can involve complex problem-solving techniques and methodologies. |
Outcome | Results in a decision or choice being made. | Results in a solution or resolution to the problem. |
Further Detail
Introduction.
Decision making and problem solving are two essential cognitive processes that individuals and organizations engage in to navigate through various challenges and achieve desired outcomes. While they are distinct processes, decision making and problem solving share several attributes and are often interconnected. In this article, we will explore the similarities and differences between decision making and problem solving, highlighting their key attributes and how they contribute to effective problem-solving and decision-making processes.
Definition and Purpose
Decision making involves selecting a course of action from multiple alternatives based on available information, preferences, and goals. It is a cognitive process that individuals use to make choices and reach conclusions. On the other hand, problem solving refers to the process of finding solutions to specific issues or challenges. It involves identifying, analyzing, and resolving problems to achieve desired outcomes.
Both decision making and problem solving share the purpose of achieving a desired outcome or resolving a particular situation. They require individuals to think critically, evaluate options, and consider potential consequences. While decision making focuses on choosing the best course of action, problem solving emphasizes finding effective solutions to specific problems or challenges.
Attributes of Decision Making
Decision making involves several key attributes that contribute to its effectiveness:
- Rationality: Decision making is often based on rational thinking, where individuals evaluate available information, weigh pros and cons, and make logical choices.
- Subjectivity: Decision making is influenced by personal preferences, values, and biases. Individuals may prioritize certain factors or options based on their subjective judgment.
- Uncertainty: Many decisions are made under conditions of uncertainty, where individuals lack complete information or face unpredictable outcomes. Decision makers must assess risks and make informed judgments.
- Time Constraints: Decision making often occurs within time constraints, requiring individuals to make choices efficiently and effectively.
- Trade-offs: Decision making involves considering trade-offs between different options, as individuals must prioritize certain factors or outcomes over others.
Attributes of Problem Solving
Problem solving also encompasses several key attributes that contribute to its effectiveness:
- Analytical Thinking: Problem solving requires individuals to analyze and break down complex problems into smaller components, facilitating a deeper understanding of the issue at hand.
- Creativity: Effective problem solving often involves thinking outside the box and generating innovative solutions. It requires individuals to explore alternative perspectives and consider unconventional approaches.
- Collaboration: Problem solving can benefit from collaboration and teamwork, as diverse perspectives and expertise can contribute to more comprehensive and effective solutions.
- Iterative Process: Problem solving is often an iterative process, where individuals continuously evaluate and refine their solutions based on feedback and new information.
- Implementation: Problem solving is not complete without implementing the chosen solution. Individuals must take action and monitor the outcomes to ensure the problem is effectively resolved.
Interconnection and Overlap
While decision making and problem solving are distinct processes, they are interconnected and often overlap. Decision making is frequently a part of the problem-solving process, as individuals must make choices and select the most appropriate solution to address a specific problem. Similarly, problem solving is inherent in decision making, as individuals must identify and analyze problems or challenges before making informed choices.
Moreover, both decision making and problem solving require critical thinking skills, the ability to evaluate information, and the consideration of potential consequences. They both involve a systematic approach to gather and analyze relevant data, explore alternatives, and assess the potential risks and benefits of different options.
Decision making and problem solving are fundamental cognitive processes that individuals and organizations engage in to navigate through challenges and achieve desired outcomes. While decision making focuses on selecting the best course of action, problem solving emphasizes finding effective solutions to specific problems or challenges. Both processes share attributes such as rationality, subjectivity, uncertainty, time constraints, and trade-offs (in decision making), as well as analytical thinking, creativity, collaboration, iterative process, and implementation (in problem solving).
Understanding the similarities and differences between decision making and problem solving can enhance our ability to approach complex situations effectively. By leveraging the attributes of both processes, individuals and organizations can make informed choices, address challenges, and achieve desired outcomes.
Comparisons may contain inaccurate information about people, places, or facts. Please report any issues.
- Subject List
- Take a Tour
- For Authors
- Subscriber Services
- Publications
- African American Studies
- African Studies
- American Literature
- Anthropology
- Architecture Planning and Preservation
- Art History
- Atlantic History
- Biblical Studies
- British and Irish Literature
- Childhood Studies
- Chinese Studies
- Cinema and Media Studies
- Communication
- Criminology
- Environmental Science
- Evolutionary Biology
- International Law
- International Relations
- Islamic Studies
- Jewish Studies
- Latin American Studies
- Latino Studies
- Linguistics
- Literary and Critical Theory
- Medieval Studies
- Military History
- Political Science
- Public Health
- Renaissance and Reformation
- Social Work
- Urban Studies
- Victorian Literature
- Browse All Subjects
How to Subscribe
- Free Trials
In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Problem Solving and Decision Making
Introduction.
- General Approaches to Problem Solving
- Representational Accounts
- Problem Space and Search
- Working Memory and Problem Solving
- Domain-Specific Problem Solving
- The Rational Approach
- Prospect Theory
- Dual-Process Theory
- Cognitive Heuristics and Biases
Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about
About related articles close popup.
Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet
Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.
- Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Psychology
- Counterfactual Reasoning
- Critical Thinking
- Heuristics and Biases
- Protocol Analysis
- Psychology and Law
Other Subject Areas
Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.
- Data Visualization
- Executive Functions in Childhood
- Remote Work
- Find more forthcoming articles...
- Export Citations
- Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Problem Solving and Decision Making by Emily G. Nielsen , John Paul Minda LAST REVIEWED: 26 June 2019 LAST MODIFIED: 26 June 2019 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0246
Problem solving and decision making are both examples of complex, higher-order thinking. Both involve the assessment of the environment, the involvement of working memory or short-term memory, reliance on long term memory, effects of knowledge, and the application of heuristics to complete a behavior. A problem can be defined as an impasse or gap between a current state and a desired goal state. Problem solving is the set of cognitive operations that a person engages in to change the current state, to go beyond the impasse, and achieve a desired outcome. Problem solving involves the mental representation of the problem state and the manipulation of this representation in order to move closer to the goal. Problems can vary in complexity, abstraction, and how well defined (or not) the initial state and the goal state are. Research has generally approached problem solving by examining the behaviors and cognitive processes involved, and some work has examined problem solving using computational processes as well. Decision making is the process of selecting and choosing one action or behavior out of several alternatives. Like problem solving, decision making involves the coordination of memories and executive resources. Research on decision making has paid particular attention to the cognitive biases that account for suboptimal decisions and decisions that deviate from rationality. The current bibliography first outlines some general resources on the psychology of problem solving and decision making before examining each of these topics in detail. Specifically, this review covers cognitive, neuroscientific, and computational approaches to problem solving, as well as decision making models and cognitive heuristics and biases.
General Overviews
Current research in the area of problem solving and decision making is published in both general and specialized scientific journals. Theoretical and scholarly work is often summarized and developed in full-length books and chapter. These may focus on the subfields of problem solving and decision making or the larger field of thinking and higher-order cognition.
back to top
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .
Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .
- About Psychology »
- Meet the Editorial Board »
- Abnormal Psychology
- Academic Assessment
- Acculturation and Health
- Action Regulation Theory
- Action Research
- Addictive Behavior
- Adolescence
- Adoption, Social, Psychological, and Evolutionary Perspect...
- Advanced Theory of Mind
- Affective Forecasting
- Affirmative Action
- Ageism at Work
- Allport, Gordon
- Alzheimer’s Disease
- Ambulatory Assessment in Behavioral Science
- Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
- Animal Behavior
- Animal Learning
- Anxiety Disorders
- Art and Aesthetics, Psychology of
- Assessment and Clinical Applications of Individual Differe...
- Attachment in Social and Emotional Development across the ...
- Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Adults
- Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Childre...
- Attitudinal Ambivalence
- Attraction in Close Relationships
- Attribution Theory
- Authoritarian Personality
- Bayesian Statistical Methods in Psychology
- Behavior Therapy, Rational Emotive
- Behavioral Economics
- Behavioral Genetics
- Belief Perseverance
- Bereavement and Grief
- Biological Psychology
- Birth Order
- Body Image in Men and Women
- Bystander Effect
- Categorical Data Analysis in Psychology
- Childhood and Adolescence, Peer Victimization and Bullying...
- Clark, Mamie Phipps
- Clinical Neuropsychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Consistency Theories
- Cognitive Dissonance Theory
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Communication, Nonverbal Cues and
- Comparative Psychology
- Competence to Stand Trial: Restoration Services
- Competency to Stand Trial
- Computational Psychology
- Conflict Management in the Workplace
- Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience
- Consciousness
- Coping Processes
- Correspondence Analysis in Psychology
- Counseling Psychology
- Creativity at Work
- Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Cultural Psychology
- Daily Life, Research Methods for Studying
- Data Science Methods for Psychology
- Data Sharing in Psychology
- Death and Dying
- Deceiving and Detecting Deceit
- Defensive Processes
- Depressive Disorders
- Development, Prenatal
- Developmental Psychology (Cognitive)
- Developmental Psychology (Social)
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM...
- Discrimination
- Dissociative Disorders
- Drugs and Behavior
- Eating Disorders
- Ecological Psychology
- Educational Settings, Assessment of Thinking in
- Effect Size
- Embodiment and Embodied Cognition
- Emerging Adulthood
- Emotional Intelligence
- Empathy and Altruism
- Employee Stress and Well-Being
- Environmental Neuroscience and Environmental Psychology
- Ethics in Psychological Practice
- Event Perception
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Expansive Posture
- Experimental Existential Psychology
- Exploratory Data Analysis
- Eyewitness Testimony
- Eysenck, Hans
- Factor Analysis
- Festinger, Leon
- Five-Factor Model of Personality
- Flynn Effect, The
- Forensic Psychology
- Forgiveness
- Friendships, Children's
- Fundamental Attribution Error/Correspondence Bias
- Gambler's Fallacy
- Game Theory and Psychology
- Geropsychology, Clinical
- Global Mental Health
- Habit Formation and Behavior Change
- Health Psychology
- Health Psychology Research and Practice, Measurement in
- Heider, Fritz
- History of Psychology
- Human Factors
- Humanistic Psychology
- Implicit Association Test (IAT)
- Industrial and Organizational Psychology
- Inferential Statistics in Psychology
- Insanity Defense, The
- Intelligence
- Intelligence, Crystallized and Fluid
- Intercultural Psychology
- Intergroup Conflict
- International Classification of Diseases and Related Healt...
- International Psychology
- Interviewing in Forensic Settings
- Intimate Partner Violence, Psychological Perspectives on
- Introversion–Extraversion
- Item Response Theory
- Law, Psychology and
- Lazarus, Richard
- Learned Helplessness
- Learning Theory
- Learning versus Performance
- LGBTQ+ Romantic Relationships
- Lie Detection in a Forensic Context
- Life-Span Development
- Locus of Control
- Loneliness and Health
- Mathematical Psychology
- Meaning in Life
- Mechanisms and Processes of Peer Contagion
- Media Violence, Psychological Perspectives on
- Mediation Analysis
- Memories, Autobiographical
- Memories, Flashbulb
- Memories, Repressed and Recovered
- Memory, False
- Memory, Human
- Memory, Implicit versus Explicit
- Memory in Educational Settings
- Memory, Semantic
- Meta-Analysis
- Metacognition
- Metaphor, Psychological Perspectives on
- Microaggressions
- Military Psychology
- Mindfulness
- Mindfulness and Education
- Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)
- Money, Psychology of
- Moral Conviction
- Moral Development
- Moral Psychology
- Moral Reasoning
- Nature versus Nurture Debate in Psychology
- Neuroscience of Associative Learning
- Nonergodicity in Psychology and Neuroscience
- Nonparametric Statistical Analysis in Psychology
- Observational (Non-Randomized) Studies
- Obsessive-Complusive Disorder (OCD)
- Occupational Health Psychology
- Olfaction, Human
- Operant Conditioning
- Optimism and Pessimism
- Organizational Justice
- Parenting Stress
- Parenting Styles
- Parents' Beliefs about Children
- Path Models
- Peace Psychology
- Perception, Person
- Performance Appraisal
- Personality and Health
- Personality Disorders
- Personality Psychology
- Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies: From Car...
- Phenomenological Psychology
- Placebo Effects in Psychology
- Play Behavior
- Positive Psychological Capital (PsyCap)
- Positive Psychology
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
- Prejudice and Stereotyping
- Pretrial Publicity
- Prisoner's Dilemma
- Problem Solving and Decision Making
- Procrastination
- Prosocial Behavior
- Prosocial Spending and Well-Being
- Psycholinguistics
- Psychological Literacy
- Psychological Perspectives on Food and Eating
- Psychology, Political
- Psychoneuroimmunology
- Psychophysics, Visual
- Psychotherapy
- Psychotic Disorders
- Publication Bias in Psychology
- Reasoning, Counterfactual
- Rehabilitation Psychology
- Relationships
- Reliability–Contemporary Psychometric Conceptions
- Religion, Psychology and
- Replication Initiatives in Psychology
- Research Methods
- Risk Taking
- Role of the Expert Witness in Forensic Psychology, The
- Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accurate Es...
- Schizophrenic Disorders
- School Psychology
- School Psychology, Counseling Services in
- Self, Gender and
- Self, Psychology of the
- Self-Construal
- Self-Control
- Self-Deception
- Self-Determination Theory
- Self-Efficacy
- Self-Esteem
- Self-Monitoring
- Self-Regulation in Educational Settings
- Self-Report Tests, Measures, and Inventories in Clinical P...
- Sensation Seeking
- Sex and Gender
- Sexual Minority Parenting
- Sexual Orientation
- Signal Detection Theory and its Applications
- Simpson's Paradox in Psychology
- Single People
- Single-Case Experimental Designs
- Skinner, B.F.
- Sleep and Dreaming
- Small Groups
- Social Class and Social Status
- Social Cognition
- Social Neuroscience
- Social Support
- Social Touch and Massage Therapy Research
- Somatoform Disorders
- Spatial Attention
- Sports Psychology
- Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE): Icon and Controversy
- Stereotype Threat
- Stereotypes
- Stress and Coping, Psychology of
- Student Success in College
- Subjective Wellbeing Homeostasis
- Taste, Psychological Perspectives on
- Teaching of Psychology
- Terror Management Theory
- Testing and Assessment
- The Concept of Validity in Psychological Assessment
- The Neuroscience of Emotion Regulation
- The Reasoned Action Approach and the Theories of Reasoned ...
- The Weapon Focus Effect in Eyewitness Memory
- Theory of Mind
- Therapy, Cognitive-Behavioral
- Thinking Skills in Educational Settings
- Time Perception
- Trait Perspective
- Trauma Psychology
- Twin Studies
- Type A Behavior Pattern (Coronary Prone Personality)
- Unconscious Processes
- Video Games and Violent Content
- Virtues and Character Strengths
- Women and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM...
- Women, Psychology of
- Work Well-Being
- Workforce Training Evaluation
- Wundt, Wilhelm
- Privacy Policy
- Cookie Policy
- Legal Notice
- Accessibility
Powered by:
- [185.126.86.119]
- 185.126.86.119
![makalah problem solving and decision making GCFGlobal Logo](https://media.gcflearnfree.org/global/gcfglobal-color.png)
- Get started with computers
- Learn Microsoft Office
- Apply for a job
- Improve my work skills
- Design nice-looking docs
- Getting Started
- Smartphones & Tablets
- Typing Tutorial
- Online Learning
- Basic Internet Skills
- Online Safety
- Social Media
- Zoom Basics
- Google Docs
- Google Sheets
- Career Planning
- Resume Writing
- Cover Letters
- Job Search and Networking
- Business Communication
- Entrepreneurship 101
- Careers without College
- Job Hunt for Today
- 3D Printing
- Freelancing 101
- Personal Finance
- Sharing Economy
- Decision-Making
- Graphic Design
- Photography
- Image Editing
- Learning WordPress
- Language Learning
- Critical Thinking
- For Educators
- Translations
- Staff Picks
- English expand_more expand_less
Critical Thinking and Decision-Making - What is Critical Thinking?
Critical thinking and decision-making -, what is critical thinking, critical thinking and decision-making what is critical thinking.
![makalah problem solving and decision making GCFLearnFree Logo](https://media.gcflearnfree.org/mobile/GCF_whitelogo.png)
Critical Thinking and Decision-Making: What is Critical Thinking?
Lesson 1: what is critical thinking, what is critical thinking.
Critical thinking is a term that gets thrown around a lot. You've probably heard it used often throughout the years whether it was in school, at work, or in everyday conversation. But when you stop to think about it, what exactly is critical thinking and how do you do it ?
Watch the video below to learn more about critical thinking.
Simply put, critical thinking is the act of deliberately analyzing information so that you can make better judgements and decisions . It involves using things like logic, reasoning, and creativity, to draw conclusions and generally understand things better.
![illustration of the terms logic, reasoning, and creativity illustration of the terms logic, reasoning, and creativity](https://media.gcflearnfree.org/content/5cd9b29530f8800670812d96_05_13_2019/CT_logic_reasoning_creativity.jpg)
This may sound like a pretty broad definition, and that's because critical thinking is a broad skill that can be applied to so many different situations. You can use it to prepare for a job interview, manage your time better, make decisions about purchasing things, and so much more.
The process
![illustration of "thoughts" inside a human brain, with several being connected and "analyzed" illustration of "thoughts" inside a human brain, with several being connected and "analyzed"](https://media.gcflearnfree.org/content/5cd9b29530f8800670812d96_05_13_2019/CT_intentional_process.jpg)
As humans, we are constantly thinking . It's something we can't turn off. But not all of it is critical thinking. No one thinks critically 100% of the time... that would be pretty exhausting! Instead, it's an intentional process , something that we consciously use when we're presented with difficult problems or important decisions.
Improving your critical thinking
![illustration of the questions "What do I currently know?" and "How do I know this?" illustration of the questions "What do I currently know?" and "How do I know this?"](https://media.gcflearnfree.org/content/5cd9b29530f8800670812d96_05_13_2019/CT_questions.jpg)
In order to become a better critical thinker, it's important to ask questions when you're presented with a problem or decision, before jumping to any conclusions. You can start with simple ones like What do I currently know? and How do I know this? These can help to give you a better idea of what you're working with and, in some cases, simplify more complex issues.
Real-world applications
![illustration of a hand holding a smartphone displaying an article that reads, "Study: Cats are better than dogs" illustration of a hand holding a smartphone displaying an article that reads, "Study: Cats are better than dogs"](https://media.gcflearnfree.org/content/5cd9b29530f8800670812d96_05_13_2019/CT_article.jpg)
Let's take a look at how we can use critical thinking to evaluate online information . Say a friend of yours posts a news article on social media and you're drawn to its headline. If you were to use your everyday automatic thinking, you might accept it as fact and move on. But if you were thinking critically, you would first analyze the available information and ask some questions :
- What's the source of this article?
- Is the headline potentially misleading?
- What are my friend's general beliefs?
- Do their beliefs inform why they might have shared this?
![illustration of "Super Cat Blog" and "According to survery of cat owners" being highlighted from an article on a smartphone illustration of "Super Cat Blog" and "According to survery of cat owners" being highlighted from an article on a smartphone](https://media.gcflearnfree.org/content/5cd9b29530f8800670812d96_05_13_2019/CT_analysis_results.jpg)
After analyzing all of this information, you can draw a conclusion about whether or not you think the article is trustworthy.
Critical thinking has a wide range of real-world applications . It can help you to make better decisions, become more hireable, and generally better understand the world around you.
![illustration of a lightbulb, a briefcase, and the world illustration of a lightbulb, a briefcase, and the world](https://media.gcflearnfree.org/content/5cd9b29530f8800670812d96_05_13_2019/CT_real_world.jpg)
/en/problem-solving-and-decision-making/why-is-it-so-hard-to-make-decisions/content/
Problem Solving and Decision Making
Cite this chapter.
- Linda Drake Gobbo 3
Part of the book series: Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation ((AGDN,volume 3))
7982 Accesses
Problem solving and decision making in multicultural work teams are the last of the skill areas to be covered in this book. This topic will be discussed from the cultural, individual, and organizational levels of multicultural team development, building on the frameworks that have been presented in previous chapters. Many theorists consider problem solving and decision making as synonymous-all decisions are made in response to a problem or opportunity. Simply stated, if problem solving is the process used to find a solution to the problem, challenge, or opportunity. However, how one solves problems can be quite varied. An individual can use analytical tools based on logic, deduction, or induction, or intuition based on an understanding of principles, or creative thinking. Problem-solving abilities and approaches may vary considerably, actually using different paradigms or frameworks. In this chapter one approach, with the steps and methods to do problem solving in work teams, will be presented.
There are six steps to the problem-solving model described and demonstrated in this chapter. Several of those steps within the model are used for decisionmaking, and are covered as well. How a team makes the decision, and who on the team makes it are important elements and will also be discussed. As prior chapters have noted, membership of multicultural teams varies greatly. The procedures each member follows, the different value orientations guiding their behavior (Smith et al. 2002), the nature of the tasks they must complete, and the communication tools they employ (face-to-face and/or technology-based) all impact how they approach problem solving and decision making. When done effectively, problem solving, which includes decision making, moves through all the steps described here equally, engaging the knowledge and skills of all team members.
This chapter will first present theoretical frameworks for problem solving, then define the steps that comprise problem solving and decision making within them. This will be followed by a discussion of the cultural variations, and impact of individual styles and societal assumptions on decision-making. Shared mental models and consensus are offered as methods to equalize participation in team decision making, and an overview of other methods provided. The last section will look at ways to coordinate the stages of team development with the variety of problemsolving and decision-making techniques in order to maximize a team’s effectiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Subscribe and save.
- Get 10 units per month
- Download Article/Chapter or eBook
- 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
- Cancel anytime
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Leading Global Teams Means Dealing with Different
![makalah problem solving and decision making makalah problem solving and decision making](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1057%2Fs41267-020-00385-z/MediaObjects/41267_2020_385_Fig1_HTML.png)
The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews
![makalah problem solving and decision making makalah problem solving and decision making](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1057%2Fs41267-020-00389-9/MediaObjects/41267_2020_389_Fig1_HTML.png)
Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A retrospective of research on multicultural work groups and an agenda for future research
Adler, N.J. (2002). International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
Google Scholar
Cooperrider, D.L., Whitney, D. and Stavros, J.M. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry: The First in a Series of AI Workbooks for Leaders of Change. Brunswick, OH: Crown Custom Publishing.
Enayati, J. (2001). The research: Effective communication and decision-making in diverse groups. In Hemmati, M. (Ed.), Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability-Beyond Deadlock and Conflict. London, England: Earthscan.
Gardenswartz, L. and Rowe, A. (2003). In L. Gardenswartz and A. Rowe (Eds.), Diverse Teams at Work: Capitalizing on the Power of Diversity (1st ed.). Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.
Halverson, C.B. (2004). Effective Multicultural Teams (5th ed.). Brattleboro, VT: School for International Training.
Harrington-Macklin, D. (1994). The Team Building Tool Kit: Tips, Tactics, and Rules for Effective Workplace Teams. New York: American Management Association.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Jeffery, A.B., Maes, J.D. and Bratton-Jeffery, M.F. (2005). Improving team decision-making performance with collaborative modeling. [Electronic version]. Team Performance Management, 11 (1/2), 40–50. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from the Emerald In sight database.
Article Google Scholar
Kayser, T.A. (1994). Building Team Power: How to Unleash the Collaborative Genius of Work Teams. New York: Irwin.
Kelly, K.P. (1994). Team Decision Making Techniques. Irvine, CA: Richard Chang Associates.
Kline, T. (1999). In M. Holt, D. Ullius and P. Berkman (Eds.), Remaking Teams: The Revolutionary Research-based Guide That Puts Theory into Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
Magruder Watkins, J. and Mohr, B.J. (2001). Appreciative Inquiry, Change at the Speed of Imagination. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfieffer.
Mathieu, J., Heffner, T., Goodwin, G., Cannon-Bowers, J. and Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 37–56.
McFadzean, E. (2002). Developing and supporting creative problem-solving teams: Part 1—a conceptual model. [Electronic version]. Management Decision, 40(5), 463–475. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from the Emerald Insight database.
McFadzean, E. (2002). Developing and supporting creative problem solving teams: Part 2-facili-tator competencies. [Electronic version]. Management Decision, 40(6), 537–551. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from the Emerald Insight database.
McKenna, R.J. and Martin-Smith, B. (2005). Decision making as a simplification process: New conceptual perspectives.[Electronic version]. Management Decision, 43(6), 821–836. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from the Emerald Insight database.
Sagie, A. and Akcan, Z. (2003). A cross-cultural analysis of participative decision-making in organizations. Human Relations, 56(4), 453–473.
Selart, M. (2005). Understanding the role of locus of control in consultative decision-making: A case study. [Electronic version]. Management Decision, 43(3), 397–412. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from the Emerald Insight database.
Simon, T., Pelled, L.H. and Smith, K.A. (1999). Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (6), 662–673.
Smith, P.B., Peterson, M.F. and Schwartz, S.H. (2002). Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behavior. [Electronic version]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(2), 188–208.
Tomlinson, S. (1999). Comparison of consensus Japanese style and Quaker style. [Electronic version]. Retrieved July 1, 2006, from http://www.earlham.edu/~consense/scott2.shtml
Watkins, J.M. and Mohr, B.J. (2001). Appreciative Inquiry: Change at the Speed of Imagination. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
Whitney, D. and Trosten-Bloom, A. (2003). The Power of Appreciative Inquiry: A Practical Guide to Positive Change. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
School for International Training, Brattleboro, VT, USA
Linda Drake Gobbo
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Editor information
Editors and affiliations.
Claire B. Halverson & S. Aqeel Tirmizi &
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Gobbo, L.D. (2008). Problem Solving and Decision Making. In: Halverson, C.B., Tirmizi, S.A. (eds) Effective Multicultural Teams: Theory and Practice. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6957-4_9
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6957-4_9
Publisher Name : Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN : 978-1-4020-6956-7
Online ISBN : 978-1-4020-6957-4
eBook Packages : Business and Economics Business and Management (R0)
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
![makalah problem solving and decision making Cart](https://hbr.org/resources/css/images/cart-icon.png)
- SUGGESTED TOPICS
- The Magazine
- Newsletters
- Managing Yourself
- Managing Teams
- Work-life Balance
- The Big Idea
- Data & Visuals
- Reading Lists
- Case Selections
- HBR Learning
- Topic Feeds
- Account Settings
- Email Preferences
How to Make Great Decisions, Quickly
- Martin G. Moore
![makalah problem solving and decision making makalah problem solving and decision making](https://hbr.org/resources/images/article_assets/2022/03/A_Mar22_23_Adobe414438392-01.jpg)
It’s a skill that will set you apart.
As a new leader, learning to make good decisions without hesitation and procrastination is a capability that can set you apart from your peers. While others vacillate on tricky choices, your team could be hitting deadlines and producing the type of results that deliver true value. That’s something that will get you — and them — noticed. Here are a few of a great decision:
- Great decisions are shaped by consideration of many different viewpoints. This doesn’t mean you should seek out everyone’s opinion. The right people with the relevant expertise need to clearly articulate their views to help you broaden your perspective and make the best choice.
- Great decisions are made as close as possible to the action. Remember that the most powerful people at your company are rarely on the ground doing the hands-on work. Seek input and guidance from team members who are closest to the action.
- Great decisions address the root cause, not just the symptoms. Although you may need to urgently address the symptoms, once this is done you should always develop a plan to fix the root cause, or else the problem is likely to repeat itself.
- Great decisions balance short-term and long-term value. Finding the right balance between short-term and long-term risks and considerations is key to unlocking true value.
- Great decisions are timely. If you consider all of the elements listed above, then it’s simply a matter of addressing each one with a heightened sense of urgency.
Like many young leaders, early in my career, I thought a great decision was one that attracted widespread approval. When my colleagues smiled and nodded their collective heads, it reinforced (in my mind, at least) that I was an excellent decision maker.
![makalah problem solving and decision making makalah problem solving and decision making](https://hbr.org/resources/css/images/hmm/HBR-learning-icon.png)
- MM Martin G. Moore is the founder of Your CEO Mentor and author of No Bullsh!t Leadership and host of the No Bullsh!t Leadership podcast. His purpose is to improve the quality of leaders globally through practical, real world leadership content. For more information, please visit, www.martingmoore.com.
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Partner Center
![makalah problem solving and decision making Rebel's Guide to Project Management](https://rebelsguidetopm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/cropped-RGPM-Logo_-01-1.webp)
Making the Difference: Problem Solving vs Decision Making
This blog is reader-supported. When you purchase something through an affiliate link on this site, I may earn some coffee money. Thanks! Learn more .
Do you ever find yourself stuck between a rock and hard place, unable to decide what the best course of action is?
I have. Whether it’s what desk to put in our new conservatory space (and I’ll tell you what we ended up deciding later), or who to invite to meetings, or managing to order everyone else’s food and then getting so overwhelmed with having made decisions all day for all the people that I couldn’t choose anything for myself.
I left the café with nothing for me and ended up with a couple of slices of peanut butter toast at home.
Making decisions can be difficult for even the most experienced project managers. But before making any decision, it’s important to understand the difference between problem solving and decision making.
Ready to get into it?
Problem solving involves diagnosing issues that arise during projects while decision making requires taking appropriate steps based on those diagnoses. While they may appear similar at first glance, there are key differences in how each process should be approached – understanding these differences will help you make more informed decisions!
Let’s explore both processes as well as their similarities and differences.
What is problem solving?
You’ve been solving problems since you were a baby: how to stand up, how to get your socks off, how to get your parents to bring you your favorite sippy cup.
As an adult, we solve problems every day at work and at home.
So it probably sounds a bit odd to want to define problem solving before we go any further. Surely we all know what we are talking about as we do it all the time?
Humor me. Problem solving is the process of identifying and analyzing a problem, generating potential solutions, and selecting the best solution to address the issue. It involves breaking down complex problems into smaller components and then finding ways to solve them.
The problem solving process
If you think that description sounds linear, then you’d be right. Problem solving fits neatly into a process, one that we don’t even know we’re following most of the time.
The problem solving process typically consists of four steps:
- Identify the problem
- Generate possible solutions
- Evaluate each option
- Select an appropriate course of action.
That does make it sound easy. Wicked problems need a slightly different approach (PMI has a problem solving training course that is brilliant and will help with that).
But for now, let’s stick with a high-level approach that works for most problems.
1. Identify the problem
First, it’s important to understand what caused the issue in order to determine how best to resolve it.
You’d be surprised at how many managers don’t bother to find the root cause of the problem to truly understand it. Use techniques like the 5 Whys or an Ishikawa diagram to dig down into what the problem actually is.
2. Generate possible solutions
Brainstorming is one way to come up with different ideas for potential solutions. You could also interview experts, review lessons learned or innovative solutions from previous projects, research what the rest of your industry is doing or consult customers on what they’d like to see. There are no silly ideas at this point!
Choose the creative approach that gets you a range of options to review.
Read next: How to improve problem solving with lessons learned.
3. Evaluate each option
Once you have several options to consider, you can evaluate each one based on its effectiveness and cost before deciding which one is most suitable for your situation.
Use pairwise prioritisation, multi-criteria decision making or analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to help with the evaluation.
![Making the Difference: Problem Solving vs Decision Making 1 analytical hierarchy process](https://rebelsguidetopm.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Analytical-Hierarchy-Process-1.webp)
4. Select an appropriate course of action
Now you’ve got all the options for solving your problem, you can actually solve it by choosing a course of action that will sort it out. This is where decision making comes in. in this step you make the decision.
Finally, implement your chosen solution and monitor its progress over time so that any necessary adjustments can be made as needed.
Benefits of problem solving skills
There are many benefits associated with having effective problem solving skills.
These include improved decision making abilities (more on that in a minute), increased creativity, better communication skills, greater confidence when faced with challenging situations, enhanced ability to think critically, more efficient use of resources, improved relationships between colleagues or team members due to shared understanding of goals and increased productivity levels due to fewer mistakes being made during projects or tasks.
(Breathe. That was a long sentence, sorry.)
All these advantages make problem solving an invaluable skill in both personal life and professional life scenarios.
What is decision making?
Basically, decision making is the process of selecting a course of action from a number of alternatives. It involves gathering information, weighing options, and choosing the best option for achieving a desired outcome.
But how is that different to problem solving?
Decision making is the process of doing Step 4 of the problem solving process. It’s the choice making, option selection, conclusion of the analysis and thinking.
It’s decisive (duh), purposeful, specific. It removes the ambiguity of the ‘what do we do?’ and helps the team move towards the ‘OK, how do we do that?’
It brings action to a situation.
The decision making process
There is a simple method for decision making too, although the actual decision itself might be tough to make.
- Identify that a decision is required
- Ensure you have the data to make the decision
- Make the decision
- Tell whoever needs to implement the decision
1. Identify that a decision is required
The decision-making process typically begins with identifying what decision needs to be made. Are you making the right decision, or is there something else, deeper, different that is really what’s required?
In this step you also want to identify who is making the decision. That could be your project sponsor, a panel, you by yourself, a committee or whoever. Getting this step clear saves headaches later.
2. Ensure you have the data to make the decision
Do you have all the info you need to make the decision? If not, get it.
When decisions are made quickly but thoughtfully, they can save time and resources while still producing quality results.
Major decisions need more time spent on this step to make sure you understand all the variables.
![Making the Difference: Problem Solving vs Decision Making 2 decision chart example](https://rebelsguidetopm.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/decision-chart.jpeg)
3. Make the decision
After considering all potential solutions, it’s time to make a choice based on what will yield the best results for everyone involved.
This is the hard part: make the decision! The person or people responsible for this should weigh up the data and use their professional judgement to choose the right course of action. Decision trees can be useful here to avoid unconscious bias (or conscious bias!).
Obviously this is harder for complex decisions. What vendor to choose for a 3-year outsourcing arrangement is harder to decide than what venue to book for a team away day.
4. Tell whoever needs to implement the decision
Great – you’ve made the call and know what to do, but does the rest of the team? Don’t keep the decision to yourself!
Make sure whoever needs to know the next steps is aware that the decision has been made so they can implement it and take the right action.
Having confidence in decisions leads to greater trust between team members and better collaboration overall, which can lead to improved project outcomes over time. Well-made decisions often create opportunities for growth within teams by allowing them to learn from their mistakes as well as their successes along the way.
Similarities between problem solving and decision making
Problem solving and decision making sound very similar, right?
Well, that is true. Both processes involve gathering information, analyzing it, and coming up with solutions or courses of action. They both require critical thinking skills to identify potential solutions or options that are most likely to be successful.
The processes use a similar flow
Both processes involve identifying a problem or issue, researching possible solutions, evaluating those solutions based on criteria such as cost-effectiveness or feasibility, selecting an option from among the available choices, implementing the chosen solution, and you’d also want to monitor its effectiveness over time.
The process can be iterative if necessary; if one solution does not work out as expected then another may need to be tried until a satisfactory outcome is achieved.
They both produce a satisfactory solution
Problem solving and decision making usually lead to some kind of action being taken in order to address a given issue or situation. Problem solving often involves finding creative solutions for complex problems, while decision making typically entails selecting a course of action from several possibilities after carefully evaluating each option’s advantages and disadvantages.
But ultimately, the goal is for something positive (or at least neutral) to come out of the helpful process so that whatever challenge was initially presented can be effectively addressed.
Despite being so similar you could pretty much interchange them in some circumstances, there are some differences.
![Making the Difference: Problem Solving vs Decision Making 3 problem solving vs decision making](https://rebelsguidetopm.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Problem-solving-vs-decision-making-800x1200.webp)
Differences between problem solving and decision making
Although they have similarities in terms of the process used to come up with a solution, their goals differ significantly.
Process goals are different
The goal of problem solving is to find a solution to an existing issue. It involves identifying the cause of a problem and then finding ways to address it. Problem solving often requires input from multiple stakeholders who can provide different perspectives on how best to solve the issue at hand.
On the other hand, decision making focuses on choosing the best option from multiple alternatives. This could include selecting between competing products or services or deciding which strategy will be most effective for achieving certain objectives.
In other words: decision making doesn’t necessarily mean there is a problem. We make decisions every day about small things and big things, but they aren’t all problems that need the creative step of solutioning.
Sometimes a decision just needs to be taken and the options are clearly known.
They require different stakeholders
Another key difference between problem solving and decision making is that while problem solving typically requires input from multiple stakeholders, decision making is usually done by one individual or group who has access to all relevant information needed for the decision-making process.
To give you an example. Let’s say on a technical project the development team hit a problem. They have to bring in various subject matter experts to research and identify the parameters involved. They consult, brainstorm and debate. It’s a group effort, and it’s likely to end in a solution.
However, if I need my project sponsor to choose between two risk treatments, I’ll take him my recommendation and a summary of options and he’ll simply choose. Done.
Decisions are made based on what is known about a situation rather than relying on external opinions or advice when trying to make an informed choice about what course of action should be taken next.
They produce different results
The nature of both processes also differs in terms of the types of solutions they produce. Problem solving typically results in creative solutions that can be implemented over time, while decision making produces immediate choices from among existing alternatives without necessarily creating something new or unique.
Both processes involve the identification of a problem or issue, the collection of information to evaluate possible solutions, and an analysis of potential outcomes. The main difference between them is in their goals: problem solving seeks to identify the root cause of an issue and develop a solution that will address it; decision making focuses on selecting from among available options.
Both processes require careful consideration of facts and opinions before any action is taken. Problem solving often involves more people than decision making as it requires collaboration to identify underlying causes and brainstorm potential solutions. Decision makers may consult with others for input but ultimately make decisions independently based on their own judgment.
![Making the Difference: Problem Solving vs Decision Making 4 prioritization example](https://rebelsguidetopm.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/simplest-way-to-prioritize.jpeg)
Still got a question?
What is the difference between decision and decision making.
A decision is the act of making a choice between two or more alternatives. Decision making is the process by which decisions are made. It involves gathering information, analyzing data, evaluating alternatives and choosing a course of action based on this analysis. The outcome of the process is the decision. The decision-making process also includes monitoring progress to ensure that goals are being met and taking corrective action if needed.
What is the importance of problem-solving and decision making?
Problem-solving and decision making are essential skills for project managers and managers in general. The processes keep work moving by making sure problems get solved and decisions get made so team members are not blocked from finishing their tasks.
What are the steps in problem-solving and decision making?
Problem-solving and decision making involve a series of steps that can help ensure the best possible outcome. The first step is to identify the problem or opportunity, then analyze it by gathering relevant information and evaluating potential solutions. After considering all options, select an appropriate solution and develop an action plan for implementation. Finally, monitor progress to ensure success and make necessary adjustments along the way. By following these steps, project managers can effectively manage projects while minimizing risks and maximizing results.
Before you go…
Sometimes there isn’t a right decision – it’s simply important to make a decision. As for the desk, in the end, we used a piece of furniture we already had upstairs and didn’t buy one at all.
I spent a morning measuring and researching options, and I’ll never get that time back, but that’s OK.
As a leader, you should be skilled at solving problems and making decisions, and the processes that support them. However, you don’t have to be doing all the solving and making all the calls yourself. As long as you facilitate the process and get the right people in the room, you can step back and let the experts do their thing.
Let the right people do the work and create an environment where your projects move forward because everyone’s got what they need to keep things moving.
![makalah problem solving and decision making Elizabeth Harrin wearing a pink scarf](https://rebelsguidetopm.com/wp-content/gravatars/Elizabeth-square500-80x80.jpg)
Project manager, author, mentor
Elizabeth Harrin is a Fellow of the Association for Project Management in the UK. She holds degrees from the University of York and Roehampton University, and several project management certifications including APM PMQ. She first took her PRINCE2 Practitioner exam in 2004 and has worked extensively in project delivery for over 20 years. Elizabeth is also the founder of the Project Management Rebels community, a mentoring group for professionals. She's written several books for project managers including Managing Multiple Projects .
More From Forbes
Tips and techniques for problem-solving and decision-making.
![makalah problem solving and decision making Forbes Coaches Council](https://blogs-images.forbes.com/assets/images/avatars/blog-4025_400_80cfb5409ef6a3ac48c1a019e4375b5d.jpg)
- Share to Facebook
- Share to Twitter
- Share to Linkedin
Divya Parekh , of The DP Group, covers business growth, storytelling, high-impact performance and authority building.
Are you struggling to find effective solutions to problems you face in your professional or entrepreneurial ventures? Are you often indecisive when faced with complex decisions?
The ability to solve problems and make decisions quickly and effectively can mean the difference between success and failure. There are two main approaches to problem-solving and decision-making: vertical thinking and horizontal thinking. Both approaches have strengths and weaknesses, so understanding the differences between them can help you apply the right method at the right time.
Let's look at a few case studies to understand the very different benefits of these two approaches.
Vertical Thinking For Decision-Making
First, let's take Jane, the CFO of a financial services company. She needs to decide whether to invest in a new company software system.
Jane gathers all the relevant data about the software system and analyzes it thoroughly. She compares the cost of the system to the potential benefits, evaluates the risks involved and consults with subject matter experts. After careful consideration, she decides the benefits outweigh the costs and risks, and the company should invest in the software system.
This is vertical thinking: making a well-informed decision based on a thorough analysis of the data. Vertical thinking is especially useful in situations where there is a clear goal and a need for a precise, data-driven approach. Experts often use it in fields like finance, where decisions depend heavily on facts and figures.
Horizontal Thinking For Problem-Solving
Let's move on to Sophie, the head of marketing for a fashion company. The company has been struggling to attract new customers.
Sophie sets up a brainstorming meeting with different department heads. They come up with a variety of creative solutions based on their diverse perspectives. One idea that stands out is to partner with a popular social media influencer to promote the company's products. The team works together to develop a plan to reach out to the influencer and negotiate a partnership.
This is horizontal thinking: working with a team to generate a variety of ideas and consider different perspectives to find an innovative solution. Horizontal thinking is a great approach for problem-solving when the problem is complex and there may be multiple solutions or approaches. Creative professionals, especially in marketing, advertising and designing, highly value this approach.
How Emotions Affect These Approaches
Over several years of coaching, I've noticed that emotions can play a significant role in problem-solving and decision-making, regardless of the thinking style used.
For instance, when using vertical thinking, emotions such as frustration and impatience can arise when a person or team has been working on a problem for an extended period with no clear solution. Conversely, when a team lands on a solution, there can be a sense of relief and accomplishment.
Similarly, when using horizontal thinking, emotions such as excitement and optimism can arise during a brainstorming session when new and creative ideas are being generated. However, disappointment or frustration can also arise when an idea fails to work.
It's important to recognize and acknowledge these emotions as they can affect team dynamics and ultimately, the success of the problem-solving process. I encourage leaders to create a safe and supportive environment where team members feel comfortable expressing their emotions and concerns.
Make These Thinking Styles Work For You
In my experience, a personalized approach that balances both vertical and horizontal thinking can help manage emotions and any other issues that arise effectively. By using vertical thinking to identify specific problems and solutions, and horizontal thinking to generate creative ideas, you can create a problem-solving process that encourages collaboration, creativity and innovation while minimizing negative emotions.
Are you ready to take your problem-solving and decision-making skills to the next level?
Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?
![makalah problem solving and decision making Divya Parekh](https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/imageserve/5f6376fea0a986c267c57eaf/400x0.jpg?cropX1=0&cropX2=1000&cropY1=0&cropY2=1000)
- Editorial Standards
- Reprints & Permissions
Makalah Cermat
Sabtu, 02 mei 2020, makalah problem solving and decision making | asas-asas management.
![makalah problem solving and decision making makalah problem solving and decision making](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtah62Nqrh5plJCsgsrNeiOCakG0SAFS1aO-TP2nvQFfZQeW_SgROssQNfOnbmqTcDAjXsWeSfDGtj1iSuCxw8hRlWMB8auwjd8g3o3bqWKrXoMpR8U3iW4XwAhJOhOTa5hCTlqlP8xwaF/s1600/lambang+uin.png)
- Proses pengendalian manajemen terdiri dari : pembuatan program kerja, penyusunan anggaran, pelaksanaan dan pengukuran, pelaporan dan analisis.
1 komentar:
![makalah problem solving and decision making makalah problem solving and decision making](https://www.blogger.com/img/blogger_logo_round_35.png)
Alhamdulillah k Sangat bermanfaat makalah nya
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
COMMENTS
Makalah ini membahas tentang pemecahan masalah dan pengambilan keputusan dalam kepemimpinan. Pemimpin dituntut untuk memecahkan masalah secara bijak dan mengambil keputusan dengan berbagai pertimbangan. Al-Quran dan Hadis memberikan banyak petunjuk tentang pentingnya kemampuan manajerial bagi pemimpin dalam mengatur sumber daya untuk mencapai tujuan. Masalah adalah hal yang tidak dapat dihind
Kaitan problem solving dan decision making (Wood et al, 1998, p. 532) Problem solving Decision making Menurut Robbins (2001), setiap orang memerlukan problem-solving dan decision making skills agar "dapat mengidentifikasi persoalan, mencari dan memperoleh alternatif, menilai semua alternatif yang tersedia, dan membuat pilihan yang kompeten ...
PROBLEM SOLVING AND DECISION MAKING SKILLS. Ignatia Yohana Rembet. Download Free PDF. View PDF. Decision making and problem solving. DWI WAHYU AGUSTIAR. just a simple and basic theory of decision making process , that can lead you to have a little bit advantage. Download Free PDF.
(EFFECTIVE PROBLEM SOLVING AND DECISION MAKING) Penulis: Dr. Bibin Rubini, M.Pd. Dr. Widodo Sunaryo, S.Psi, MBA. ISBN: 978-602-73132-8-6 Editor: Dr. Henny Suharyati, M.Si. Desain Sampul dan Tata letak Fredy Herlambang, SE. Penerbit: PASPA PRESS Redaksi: Jl. Pakuan No. 1 Ciheuleut Bogor 16143 Tel 0251 8320123 Fax 0251 8320123 Email: pasca@unpak ...
Books. Problem Solving and Decision Making for Improvement. Berny Gomulya. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Dec 23, 2015 - Self-Help - 184 pages. Metode pemecahan masalah dan pengambilan keputusan yang dibahas dalam buku ini telah diajarkan di sekolah-sekolah bisnis terkemuka di seluruh dunia dan telah diterapkan oleh ribuan organisasi paling ...
Manusia dapat dibagi dalam tiga kategori dasar dalam hal. gaya merasakan masalah (problem solving styles) mereka, yaitu bagaimana mereka menghada pi masalah. Penghindar masalah (problem avoider ...
Dokumen tersebut membahas tentang problem solving dan pengambilan keputusan. Secara singkat, dokumen tersebut menjelaskan tentang proses berpikir kreatif dalam pemecahan masalah, teknik-teknik analisis masalah seperti fishbone diagram dan basic quality tools, serta tahapan-tahapan dalam proses pemecahan masalah dan pengambilan keputusan.
Problem Solving and Decision Making for Improvement. Berny Gomulya. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Apr 8, 2013 - Self-Help - 192 pages "Cara Cerdas dan Efektif dalam Memecahkan Masalah dan Mengambil Keputusan untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Organisasi Model ini diajarkan di sekolah-sekolah bisnis terkemuka di seluruh dunia dan telah digunakan oleh ribuan ...
It is a cognitive process that individuals use to make choices and reach conclusions. On the other hand, problem solving refers to the process of finding solutions to specific issues or challenges. It involves identifying, analyzing, and resolving problems to achieve desired outcomes. Both decision making and problem solving share the purpose ...
Decision making is the process of selecting and choosing one action or behavior out of several alternatives. Like problem solving, decision making involves the coordination of memories and executive resources. Research on decision making has paid particular attention to the cognitive biases that account for suboptimal decisions and decisions ...
Decision Making and Problem Solving | PDF. Scribd adalah situs bacaan dan penerbitan sosial terbesar di dunia.
A. Pengambilan Keputusan (Decision Making) 1. Pengertian Pengambilan Keputusan (Decision Making) Keputusan merupakan hasil pemecahan dalam suatu masalah yang harus dihadapi dengan tegas. Dalam Kamus Besar Ilmu Pengetahuan pengambilan keputusan (Decision Making) didefinisikan sebagai pemilihan keputusan atau kebijakan yang didasarkan atas ...
There are 4 modules in this course. Problem-solving and effective decision-making are essential skills in today's fast-paced and ever-changing workplace. Both require a systematic yet creative approach to address today's business concerns. This course will teach an overarching process of how to identify problems to generate potential ...
Definition. Simply put, critical thinking is the act of deliberately analyzing information so that you can make better judgements and decisions. It involves using things like logic, reasoning, and creativity, to draw conclusions and generally understand things better. This may sound like a pretty broad definition, and that's because critical ...
Table 9.3. dzean 2002) Attention steps Level 1: The taskProblem-solving and decision-making responsibilities Concerned with getting the task done, the task is simple or routine, or a period of. crisis and the job must be completed quickly. At this team must have a fo. Level 2: Meeting process.
Read more on Decision making and problem solving or related topics Leadership and managing people, Leadership development, Leadership qualities, Personal growth and transformation and Early career MM
Guidelines for Problem Solving and Decision Making . 1. Try to identify and define the problem. This is one of the areas where people seem to struggle because they usually react to what they think the problem may be. Instead of reacting impulsively, you should try and understand more as to why you think there is a problem in the first place.
Problem-solving and decision making involve a series of steps that can help ensure the best possible outcome. The first step is to identify the problem or opportunity, then analyze it by gathering relevant information and evaluating potential solutions. After considering all options, select an appropriate solution and develop an action plan for ...
Decision-making is the process of choosing a solution based on your judgment, situation, facts, knowledge or a combination of available data. The goal is to avoid potential difficulties. Identifying opportunity is an important part of the decision-making process. Making decisions is often a part of problem-solving.
The ability to solve problems and make decisions quickly and effectively can mean the difference between success and failure. There are two main approaches to problem-solving and decision-making ...
decision-making, problem-solving, and nursing process. 4. Identify four principles of the scientifi c method that are evident in CT. 5. Compare and contrast the terms problem-focused thinking and outcome-focused thinking. 6. Clarify the term critical thinking indicator (CTI). 7. Use CTIs, together with the 4-circle CT model, to identify fi ve CT
Puji syukur kami panjatkan kehadirat Allah SWT Tuhan Yang Maha Esa. Karena dengan rahmat, karunia, serta taufik dan hidayah-Nya lah kami dapat menyelesaikan makalah dengan judul "problem solving and decision making". Makalah ini terselesaikan tidak lepas karena bantuan dan usaha dari semua anggota kelompok.
This paper proposes a novel numerical method for solving the problem of decision making under cumulative prospect theory (CPT), where the goal is to maximize utility subject to practical constraints, assuming only finite realizations of the associated distribution are available. Existing methods for CPT optimization rely on particular ...