- Grades 6-12
- School Leaders
Have you entered to win this adorable math giveaway? ✨
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
40 Philosophy of Education Examples, Plus How To Write Your Own
Learn how to define and share your teaching philosophy.
![what is a personal philosophy of education Short Philosophy of Education Examples Feature](https://www.weareteachers.com/wp-content/uploads/Short-Philosophy-of-Education-Examples-Feature.jpg)
These days, it’s become common for educators to be asked what their personal teaching philosophy is. Whether it’s for a job interview, a college class, or to share with your principal, crafting a philosophy of education can seem like a daunting task. So set aside some time to consider your own teaching philosophy (we’ll walk you through it), and be sure to look at philosophy of education examples from others (we’ve got those too!).
What is a philosophy of education?
Before we dive into the examples, it’s important to understand the purpose of a philosophy of education. This statement will provide an explanation of your teaching values and beliefs. Your teaching philosophy is ultimately a combination of the methods you studied in college and any professional experiences you’ve learned from since. It incorporates your own experiences (negative or positive) in education.
Many teachers have two versions of their teaching philosophy: a long form (a page or so of text) and a short form. The longer form is useful for job application cover letters or to include as part of your teacher portfolio. The short form distills the longer philosophy into a couple of succinct sentences that you can use to answer teacher job interview questions or even share with parents.
What’s the best teaching philosophy?
Here’s one key thing to remember: There’s no one right answer to “What’s your teaching philosophy?” Every teacher’s will be a little bit different, depending on their own teaching style, experiences, and expectations. And many teachers find that their philosophies change over time, as they learn and grow in their careers.
When someone asks for your philosophy of education, what they really want to know is that you’ve given thought to how you prepare lessons and interact with students in and out of the classroom. They’re interested in finding out what you expect from your students and from yourself, and how you’ll apply those expectations. And they want to hear examples of how you put your teaching philosophy into action.
What’s included in strong teaching philosophy examples?
Depending on who you ask, a philosophy of education statement can include a variety of values, beliefs, and information. As you build your own teaching philosophy statement, consider these aspects, and write down your answers to the questions.
Purpose of Education (Core Beliefs)
What do you believe is the purpose of teaching and learning? Why does education matter to today’s children? How will time spent in your classroom help prepare them for the future?
Use your answers to draft the opening statement of your philosophy of education, like these:
- Education isn’t just about what students learn, but about learning how to learn.
- A good education prepares students to be productive and empathetic members of society.
- Teachers help students embrace new information and new ways of seeing the world around them.
- A strong education with a focus on fundamentals ensures students can take on any challenges that come their way.
- I believe education is key to empowering today’s youth, so they’ll feel confident in their future careers, relationships, and duties as members of their community.
- Well-educated students are open-minded, welcoming the opinions of others and knowing how to evaluate information critically and carefully.
Teaching Style and Practices
Do you believe in student-led learning, or do you like to use the Socratic method instead? Is your classroom a place for quiet concentration or sociable collaboration? Do you focus on play-based learning, hands-on practice, debate and discussion, problem-solving, or project-based learning? All teachers use a mix of teaching practices and styles, of course, but there are some you’re likely more comfortable with than others. Possible examples:
- I frequently use project-based learning in my classrooms because I believe it helps make learning more relevant to my students. When students work together to address real-world problems, they use their [subject] knowledge and skills and develop communication and critical thinking abilities too.
- Play-based learning is a big part of my teaching philosophy. Kids who learn through play have more authentic experiences, exploring and discovering the world naturally in ways that make the process more engaging and likely to make a lasting impact.
- In my classroom, technology is key. I believe in teaching students how to use today’s technology in responsible ways, embracing new possibilities and using technology as a tool, not a crutch.
- While I believe in trying new teaching methods, I also find that traditional learning activities can still be effective. My teaching is mainly a mix of lecture, Socratic seminar, and small-group discussions.
- I’m a big believer in formative assessment , taking every opportunity to measure my students’ understanding and progress. I use tools like exit tickets and Kahoot! quizzes, and watch my students closely to see if they’re engaged and on track.
- Group work and discussions play a major role in my instructional style. Students who learn to work cooperatively at a young age are better equipped to succeed in school, in their future careers, and in their communities.
Students and Learning Styles
Why is it important to recognize all learning styles? How do you accommodate different learning styles in your classroom? What are your beliefs on diversity, equity, and inclusion? How do you ensure every student in your classroom receives the same opportunities to learn? How do you expect students to behave, and how do you measure success? ADVERTISEMENT
Sample teaching philosophy statements about students might sound like this:
- Every student has their own unique talents, skills, challenges, and background. By getting to know my students as individuals, I can help them find the learning styles that work best for them, now and throughout their education.
- I find that motivated students learn best. They’re more engaged in the classroom and more diligent when working alone. I work to motivate students by making learning relevant, meaningful, and enjoyable.
- We must give every student equal opportunities to learn and grow. Not all students have the same support outside the classroom. So as a teacher, I try to help bridge gaps when I see them and give struggling students a chance to succeed academically.
- I believe every student has their own story and deserves a chance to create and share it. I encourage my students to approach learning as individuals, and I know I’m succeeding when they show a real interest in showing up and learning more every day.
- In my classroom, students take responsibility for their own success. I help them craft their own learning goals, then encourage them to evaluate their progress honestly and ask for help when they need it.
- To me, the best classrooms are those that are the most diverse. Students learn to recognize and respect each other’s differences, celebrating what each brings to the community. They also have the opportunity to find common ground, sometimes in ways that surprise them.
How do I write my philosophy of education?
Think back to any essay you’ve ever written and follow a similar format. Write in the present tense; your philosophy isn’t aspirational, it’s something you already live and follow. This is true even if you’re applying for your first teaching job. Your philosophy is informed by your student teaching, internships, and other teaching experiences.
Lead with your core beliefs about teaching and learning. These beliefs should be reflected throughout the rest of your teaching philosophy statement.
Then, explain your teaching style and practices, being sure to include concrete examples of how you put those practices into action. Transition into your beliefs about students and learning styles, with more examples. Explain why you believe in these teaching and learning styles, and how you’ve seen them work in your experiences.
A long-form philosophy of education statement usually takes a few paragraphs (not generally more than a page or two). From that long-form philosophy, highlight a few key statements and phrases and use them to sum up your teaching philosophy in a couple of well-crafted sentences for your short-form teaching philosophy.
Still feeling overwhelmed? Try answering these three key questions:
- Why do you teach?
- What are your favorite, tried-and-true methods for teaching and learning?
- How do you help students of all abilities and backgrounds learn?
If you can answer those three questions, you can write your teaching philosophy!
Short Philosophy of Education Examples
We asked real educators in the We Are Teachers HELPLINE group on Facebook to share their teaching philosophy examples in a few sentences . Here’s what they had to say:
I am always trying to turn my students into self-sufficient learners who use their resources to figure it out instead of resorting to just asking someone for the answers. —Amy J.
![I am always trying to turn my students into self-sufficient learners who use their resources to figure it out instead of resorting to just asking someone for the answers. —Amy J. I am always trying to turn my students into self-sufficient learners who use their resources to figure it out instead of resorting to just asking someone for the answers. —Amy J.](https://www.weareteachers.com/wp-content/uploads/1-69.jpg)
My philosophy is that all students can learn. Good educators meet all students’ differentiated learning needs to help all students meet their maximum learning potential. —Lisa B.
I believe that all students are unique and need a teacher that caters to their individual needs in a safe and stimulating environment. I want to create a classroom where students can flourish and explore to reach their full potential. My goal is also to create a warm, loving environment, so students feel safe to take risks and express themselves. —Valerie T.
In my classroom, I like to focus on the student-teacher relationships/one-on-one interactions. Flexibility is a must, and I’ve learned that you do the best you can with the students you have for however long you have them in your class. —Elizabeth Y
I want to prepare my students to be able to get along without me and take ownership of their learning. I have implemented a growth mindset. —Kirk H.
My teaching philosophy is centered around seeing the whole student and allowing the student to use their whole self to direct their own learning. As a secondary teacher, I also believe strongly in exposing all students to the same core content of my subject so that they have equal opportunities for careers and other experiences dependent upon that content in the future. —Jacky B.
![My teaching philosophy is centered around seeing the whole student and allowing the student to use their whole self to direct their own learning. As a secondary teacher, I also believe strongly in exposing all students to the same core content of my subject so that they have equal opportunities for careers and other experiences dependent upon that content in the future. —Jacky B. My teaching philosophy is centered around seeing the whole student and allowing the student to use their whole self to direct their own learning. As a secondary teacher, I also believe strongly in exposing all students to the same core content of my subject so that they have equal opportunities for careers and other experiences dependent upon that content in the future. —Jacky B.](https://www.weareteachers.com/wp-content/uploads/2-65.jpg)
All children learn best when learning is hands-on. This works for the high students and the low students too, even the ones in between. I teach by creating experiences, not giving information. —Jessica R.
As teachers, it’s our job to foster creativity. In order to do that, it’s important for me to embrace the mistakes of my students, create a learning environment that allows them to feel comfortable enough to take chances, and try new methods. —Chelsie L.
I believe that every child can learn and deserves the best, well-trained teacher possible who has high expectations for them. I differentiate all my lessons and include all learning modalities. —Amy S.
All students can learn and want to learn. It is my job to meet them where they are and move them forward. —Holli A.
I believe learning comes from making sense of chaos. My job is to design work that will allow students to process, explore, and discuss concepts to own the learning. I need to be part of the process to guide and challenge perceptions. —Shelly G.
![I believe learning comes from making sense of chaos. My job is to design work that will allow students to process, explore, and discuss concepts to own the learning. I need to be part of the process to guide and challenge perceptions. —Shelly G. I believe learning comes from making sense of chaos. My job is to design work that will allow students to process, explore, and discuss concepts to own the learning. I need to be part of the process to guide and challenge perceptions. —Shelly G.](https://www.weareteachers.com/wp-content/uploads/3-68.jpg)
I want my students to know that they are valued members of our classroom community, and I want to teach each of them what they need to continue to grow in my classroom. —Doreen G.
Teach to every child’s passion and encourage a joy for and love of education and school. —Iris B.
I believe in creating a classroom culture of learning through mistakes and overcoming obstacles through teamwork. —Jenn B.
It’s our job to introduce our kids to many, many different things and help them find what they excel in and what they don’t. Then nurture their excellence and help them figure out how to compensate for their problem areas. That way, they will become happy, successful adults. —Haley T.
Longer Philosophy of Education Examples
Looking for longer teaching philosophy examples? Check out these selections from experienced teachers of all ages and grades.
- Learning To Wear the Big Shoes: One Step at a Time
- Nellie Edge: My Kindergarten Teaching Philosophy
- Faculty Focus: My Philosophy of Teaching
- Robinson Elementary School: My Teaching Philosophy
- David Orace Kelly: Philosophy of Education
- Explorations in Higher Education: My Teaching Philosophy Statement
- University of Washington Medical School Faculty Teaching Philosophy Statements
Do you have any philosophy of education examples? Share them in the We Are Teachers HELPLINE Group on Facebook!
Want more articles and tips like this be sure to subscribe to our newsletters to find out when they’re posted..
![Philosophy-of-Education-1 Many educators are being asked to define their teaching philosophy. Find real philosophy of education examples and tips for building yours.](https://www.weareteachers.com/wp-content/uploads/Philosophy-of-Education-1-683x1024.jpg)
You Might Also Like
![what is a personal philosophy of education Collage of teaching portfolio examples, including traditional digital portfolios](https://www.weareteachers.com/wp-content/uploads/teaching-portfolio-examples-3-768x432.png)
15 Inspiring Teaching Portfolio Examples (Plus How To Create Your Own)
Show them what you've got. Continue Reading
Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved. 5335 Gate Parkway, Jacksonville, FL 32256
What Is a Teaching Philosophy? Examples and Prompts
![what is a personal philosophy of education teaching-philosophy](https://pce.sandiego.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/iStock-1366724877.jpg)
The life of a teacher is an extremely busy one. From early morning until long after dark, teachers dedicate the better part of their day to their students. Amid the lesson planning, the snack breaks, the recess duty, grading and the myriad other daily tasks, it can be easy to lose sight of the why of teaching.
Why are you drawn to the classroom, and what is it about your love of teaching that makes it a fulfilling career? What’s the overarching philosophy that guides your teaching practice? Even on the busiest school days, every teacher should be able to explain their “why” by returning to their teaching philosophy.
What Is a Teaching Philosophy Statement?
Simply put, a teaching philosophy is a written statement that includes:
- Your core belief(s) about the purpose of teaching and learning
- A high-level description of how you teach
- An explanation of why you teach that way
- Any primary specializations
- Examples of your teaching philosophy in practice in the classroom (if space allows)
A teaching philosophy statement should demonstrate that you are purposeful, reflective and goal-oriented each time you stand at the front of your class. Not only does committing this statement to writing help to solidify your own beliefs — it can help you collaborate with other teachers, apply for jobs and even write grant proposals. Ideally, evidence of your philosophy will be apparent in your resume and portfolio content.
Depending on the context, a teaching philosophy statement can be several sentences or several pages long. You will occasionally be asked to provide some form of this statement when applying for certain academic or administrative positions. Versions of it may also appear as the introduction to your teaching portfolio, as your LinkedIn bio, your resume objective statement or your bio for any accreditations (such as for contributions to a publication, awards, volunteer work, etc.).
You will likely never be asked to recite it. That said, when sitting for interviews, teaching applicants should demonstrate a clear teaching philosophy through their answers.
Teaching Philosophy Prompts
Think about your teaching philosophy as your teaching portrait.
Portraits can look different depending on the subject’s age and life experiences, and a teaching philosophy is no different. Younger teachers may focus on their goals and any areas of interest they studied in college. More senior teachers may update their philosophy statements to reflect their lived experiences in the classroom and how those experiences informed (or resulted from) their teaching philosophy.
The clearer and more crystallized your teaching philosophy is, the easier it will be to draw upon it in the classroom. Use any combination of the following prompts — organized from immediate to future-facing — to begin writing your own philosophy statement.
The basics
Why did you decide to become a teacher?
What teaching methods do you use?
How do you assess your students’ learning and growth?
Do you follow certain standards?
What are your strongest qualities as a teacher?
Do you have an academic specialization?
Why do you like to teach certain subjects?
How do you use technology in the classroom ?
How do you incorporate new techniques, activities, curriculum and technology into your teaching?
Student advocacy
How do you motivate your students?
How do you think students learn best?
How do you approach learners who are struggling?
How do you promote and maintain educational equity ?
How would you describe your interactions with your students?
Preservation in the classroom
What’s your classroom management style ?
How do you handle stress ?
Describe a time you handled a challenging situation.
The Big Questions
How do you define learning?
How do you define teaching?
What is the purpose of education?
How does education improve society?
Do you believe all students can learn?
What does it take to be a good teacher?
Looking ahead
What goals do you have for your students?
What goals do you have for yourself?
What achievements do you like to see at the end of every school year?
Why do you continue to want to teach?
How will you continue to grow professionally?
Just like leading students through an essay prompt, begin by creating an outline around a single thesis statement. Build a case for your core belief by giving specific examples and demonstrating an in-depth knowledge of pedagogy. Be sure to connect philosophical statements to practical outcomes or examples; otherwise, you risk the “word salad” problem, wherein the statement sounds nice but means very little to the average reader. (See Formatting Your Teaching Philosophy Statement [Plus Best Practices] below for more tips.)
>>Related Reading: 5 Reasons Why Continuing Education Matters for Educators
Be prepared for your philosophy to change over time — it’s not meant to live in stone! If you feel you need to re-write it, follow the prompts above to recrystallize your beliefs and objectives.
CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT TEMPLATE [FREE TEACHING TOOL]
Use our handy 3-page Classroom Management Template to create a plan for everything that goes into successfully operating a classroom.
![what is a personal philosophy of education](https://pce.sandiego.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Screen-Shot-2022-03-24-at-3.09.09-PM-edited.png)
Components of a Teaching Philosophy Statement
In a one- or two-sentence teaching philosophy statement, you’ll likely touch on your experience, grade and subject specialization, preferred methods and high-level goals. When crafting a longer statement, it should contain some specific components that paint the clearest picture of your teaching style.
According to the University of Minnesota , strong teaching philosophy statements share the following elements:
- Offer evidence of practice (specific examples)
- Are student-centered
- Demonstrate reflectiveness
- Demonstrate that the writer values teaching
- Are well written, clear and readable
Long-form teaching philosophy statements should follow the same tried-and-true format as a well-crafted student essay:
Introduction
This first section should include mention of:
- Your teaching methods
- Any subject or pedagogical specialties
- Your preferred method of assessment
- Your high-level goals for all students
As you go into more detail about your experience and teaching practice, it’s a good idea to give examples that support your philosophy. If you choose to cite any educational researchers or studies, be sure you credit your sources. You may want to touch upon:
- A list of courses you have taught
- A list or short descriptions of effective learning engagements
- What you consider the ideal classroom environment
- Your personal approach to classroom management
- How you facilitate age-appropriate learning
- How you facilitate learning for students of differing abilities
- How you involve students in their own learning and assessment
- An example of a challenge you solved in the classroom
Conclusion
A good teacher is never done growing and learning. Wrap up your philosophy statement by describing your objectives, which should include student-oriented academic goals, professional development goals and the ideal outcomes of your teaching career. Your conclusion could include:
- content mastery
- discovery and knowledge generation
- critical thinking
- problem solving
- individual fulfillment
- self-directed learning
- experiential learning
- engaged citizenship
- …or something else?
- The goals you’ve already achieved as a teacher, as well as those in progress
- What makes you unique as an educator
If you are asked for supplemental materials as part of a teaching job application, you can provide:
- Peer reviews
- Letters of recommendation
- Students’ comments
- Performance ratings
- Lesson plans
- Teaching activities
Formatting Your Teaching Philosophy Statement [Plus Best Practices]
Your teaching philosophy is unique to you, so there is no right or wrong way to go about it. That said, there are some best practices to follow when it comes to formatting and readability to make it easy for potential employers and others to read.
Write in the first person: You’re writing about your own goals, vision and philosophy — it’s okay to use “I” statements!
Write in the present tense: Your philosophy statement should reflect your current views and experience level, not those you hope to have someday.
Avoid wordiness: Your teaching philosophy should be easy enough for an eighth-grade reader to understand, barring any pedagogical terminology. Making simple concepts more complicated for show is an easy way to lose your reader. Unless you’re going for a university lecturer position, avoid the AP-level vocabulary words on principle.
Use specific examples: Potential employers — or readers of your academic papers — want to know how your philosophy plays out in the classroom. Your expertise in project-based learning (PBL) will carry more weight if you can describe a specific assignment you designed around PBL, and what the outcome was.
Skip the clichés: If you say you want to teach to “change the world,” or that you believe “children are our future,” be prepared to give concrete examples of what you mean. Teaching philosophies are not meant to be abstract or even overly aspirational — leave this to motivational posters.
If you find you are struggling to craft your ideal philosophy statement, ask a colleague to review and highlight possible areas for expansion or clarification. You can even ask this colleague to note any recurring themes they notice, so you can mention them briefly in your introduction. Compare your draft to others in your field with similar specialities or levels of experience and make changes as necessary.
Take the next step in your professional journey with our Education certificate programs . >
The easiest way to maintain and share your philosophy statement and portfolio is to keep everything in a digital format. Whether that’s an editable PDF you can make small changes or updates to, or a cloud-based folder you can invite others to view, digital is the safest and most portable format.
Teaching Philosophy Examples
Here are some examples of teaching philosophy statements from real teachers. Note that each statement will not follow all of the prompts above, but this is because each statement should be unique and personal to each educator.
“My philosophy of education is that all children are unique and must have a stimulating educational environment where they can grow mentally, emotionally, and socially. It is my desire to create this type of atmosphere where students can meet their full potential. I will provide a safe environment where students are invited to share their ideas and take risks. They should be able to have choices and let their curiosity direct their learning as I operate as a facilitator.” Mr. B., Language Arts, 5th & 6th grade
FAQs About Teaching Philosophies
Do i need a teaching philosophy to get a teaching job.
Most teachers who earn master’s degrees are asked to write a philosophy statement as part of their program. Whether or not you have a master’s degree in education, you may be asked to provide some form of a teaching philosophy statement when applying for certain academic or administrative positions. You may also want to craft a version of this statement as the introduction to your teaching portfolio, as your LinkedIn bio, your resume objective statement or your bio for any accreditations (such as for contributions to a publication, awards, volunteer work, etc.).
You will likely never be asked to recite your teaching philosophy, and a lack of a formal written philosophy should not bar you from consideration for teaching jobs. That said, when sitting for interviews, teaching applicants should demonstrate a clear teaching philosophy through their answers.
Can I change my teaching philosophy?
Yes! In fact, teachers should expect their philosophy to change with time, experience, and professional and personal development. If at any point you feel you need to re-write your philosophy statement, follow the prompts in this article to recrystallize your beliefs and objectives.
Helpful Resource Links
Effective Classroom Management Solutions Certificate
Addressing topics like teaching positive social skills, diverse learners and restorative justice, this certificate helps current educators strengthen their overall classroom management approach.
Professional Teachers Program Series
A series of self-paced courses covering remote teaching, student anxiety, educational equity and homeschooling, all designed for the mid-career to veteran teacher.
Using Inquiry, Discussion, and Experience to Develop Critical Thinkers and Inspire Lifelong Learning
How can you authentically engage students while ensuring they receive the education they require? This course presents new ways to approach tired subjects, and capture students’ interest along the way.
Curriculum covered in this article
Be sure to share this article.
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Share on LinkedIn
Your Salary
Browse over 500+ educator courses and numerous certificates to enhance your curriculum and earn credit toward salary advancement.
- MyU : For Students, Faculty, and Staff
- Academic Leaders
- Faculty and Instructors
- Graduate Students and Postdocs
Center for Educational Innovation
Request a consultation
- Campus and Collegiate Liaisons
- Pedagogical Innovations Journal Club
- Teaching Enrichment Series
- Recorded Webinars
- Video Series
- All Services
- Teaching Consultations
- Student Feedback Facilitation
- Instructional Media Production
- Curricular and Educational Initiative Consultations
- Educational Research and Evaluation
- Thank a Teacher
- All Teaching Resources
- Teaching with GenAI
- Active Learning
- Active Learning Classrooms
- Aligned Course Design
- Assessments
- Documenting Growth in Teaching
- Early Term Feedback
- Inclusive Teaching at a Predominantly White Institution
- Leveraging the Learning Sciences
- Online Teaching and Design
- Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
- Strategies to Support Challenging Conversations in the Classroom
- Teaching During the Election Season
- Team Projects
- Writing Your Teaching Philosophy
- All Programs
- Assessment Deep Dive
- Designing and Delivering Online Learning
- Early Career Teaching and Learning Program
- Inclusive STEM Teaching Program
- International Teaching Assistant (ITA) Program
- Preparing Future Faculty Program
- Teaching with Access and Inclusion Program
- "Teaching with AI" Book Club
- Teaching for Student Well-Being Program
- Teaching Assistant and Postdoc Professional Development Program
Your teaching philosophy is a self-reflective statement of your beliefs about teaching and learning. It's a one to two page narrative that conveys your core ideas about being an effective teacher in the context of your discipline. It develops these ideas with specific, concrete examples of what the teacher and learners will do to achieve those goals. Importantly, your teaching philosophy statement also explains why you choose these options.
+ Getting Started
Your reasons for writing a teaching philosophy may vary. You might be writing it as an exercise in concisely documenting your beliefs so that you can easily articulate them to your students, peers, or a search committee. It might serve as the introduction to your teaching portfolio. Or, it can serve as a means of professional growth as it requires you to give examples of how you enact your philosophy, thus requiring you to consider the degree to which your teaching is congruent with your beliefs.
Generating ideas
Teaching philosophies express your values and beliefs about teaching. They are personal statements that introduce you, as a teacher, to your reader. As such, they are written in the first person and convey a confident, professional tone. When writing a teaching philosophy, use specific examples to illustrate your points. You should also discuss how your values and beliefs about teaching fit into the context of your discipline.
Below are categories you might address with prompts to help you begin generating ideas. Work through each category, spending time thinking about the prompts and writing your ideas down. These notes will comprise the material you’ll use to write the first draft of your teaching philosophy statement. It will help if you include both general ideas (‘I endeavor to create lifelong learners’) as well as specifics about how you will enact those goals. A teaching philosophy template is also available to help you get started.
Questions to prompt your thinking
Your concept of learning.
What do you mean by learning? What happens in a successful learning situation? Note what constitutes "learning" or "mastery" in your discipline.
Your concept of teaching
What are your values, beliefs, and aspirations as a teacher? Do you wish to encourage mastery, competency, transformational learning, lifelong learning, general transference of skills, critical thinking? What does a perfect teaching situation look like to you and why? How are the values and beliefs realized in classroom activities? You may discuss course materials, lesson plans, activities, assignments, and assessment instruments.
Your goals for students
What skills should students obtain as a result of your teaching? Think about your ideal student and what the outcomes of your teaching would be in terms of this student's knowledge or behavior. Address the goals you have for specific classes or curricula and that rational behind them (i.e., critical thinking, writing, or problem solving).
Your teaching methods
What methods will you consider to reach these goals and objectives? What are your beliefs regarding learning theory and specific strategies you would use, such as case studies, group work, simulations, interactive lectures? You might also want to include any new ideas or strategies you want to try.
Your interaction with students
What are you attitudes towards advising and mentoring students? How would an observer see you interact with students? Why do you want to work with students?
Assessing learning
How will you assess student growth and learning? What are your beliefs about grading? Do you grade students on a percentage scale (criterion referenced) or on a curve (norm referenced)? What different types of assessment will you use (i.e. traditional tests, projects, portfolios, presentations) and why?
Professional growth
How will you continue growing as a teacher? What goals do you have for yourself and how will you reach them? How have your attitudes towards teaching and learning changed over time? How will you use student evaluations to improve your teaching? How might you learn new skills? How do you know when you've taught effectively?
+ Creating a Draft
Two ways of organizing your draft.
Now that you've written down your values, attitudes, and beliefs about teaching and learning, it's time to organize those thoughts into a coherent form. Perhaps the easiest way of organizing this material would be to write a paragraph covering each of the seven prompts you answered in the Getting Started section. These would then become the seven major sections of your teaching philosophy.
Another way of knitting your reflections together—and one that is more personal—is to read through your notes and underscore ideas or observations that come up more than once. Think of these as "themes" that might point you toward an organizational structure for the essay. For example, you read through your notes and realize that you spend a good deal of time writing about your interest in mentoring students. This might become one of the three or four major foci of your teaching philosophy. You should then discuss what it says about your attitudes toward teaching, learning, and what's important in your discipline.
No matter which style you choose, make sure to keep your writing succinct. Aim for two double-spaced pages. And don't forget to start with a "hook." Your job is to make your readers want to read more; their level of engagement is highest when they read your opening line. Hook your readers by beginning with a question, a statement, or even an event from your past.
Using specific examples
Remember to provide concrete examples from your teaching practice to illustrate the general claims you make in your teaching philosophy. The following general statements about teaching are intended as prompts to help you come up with examples to illustrate your claims about teaching. For each statement, how would you describe what happens in your classroom? Is your description specific enough to bring the scene to life in a teaching philosophy?
"I value helping my students understand difficult information. I am an expert, and my role is to model for them complex ways of thinking so that they can develop the same habits of mind as professionals in the medical field."
"I enjoy lecturing, and I'm good at it. I always make an effort to engage and motivate my students when I lecture."
"It is crucial for students of geology to learn the techniques of field research. An important part of my job as a professor of geology is to provide these opportunities."
"I believe that beginning physics students should be introduced to the principles of hypothesis generation, experimentation, data collection, and analysis. By learning the scientific method, they develop critical thinking skills they can apply to other areas of their lives. Small group work is a crucial tool for teaching the scientific method."
"As a teacher of writing, I am committed to using peer review in my classes. By reading and commenting on other students' work in small cooperative groups, my students learn to find their voice, to understand the important connection between writer and audience, and to hone their editing skills. Small group work is indispensible in the writing classroom."
Go back to the notes you made when getting started and underline the general statements you’ve made about teaching and learning. As you start drafting, make sure to note the specific approaches, methods, or products you use to realize those goals.
+ Assessing Your Draft
Assessing your draft teaching philosophy.
According to a survey of search committee chairs by the University of Michigan Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, there are five elements that are shared by strong teaching philosophy statements:
- They offer evidence of practice (specific examples)
- They are student-centered
- They demonstrate reflectiveness
- They demonstrate that the writer values teaching
- They are well written, clear, and readable
Now that you’ve completed an initial draft, ask whether your statement captures these elements and how well you articulate them.
You might find it useful to compare your draft to other teaching philosophies in your discipline. It can also be useful to have a colleague review your draft and offer recommendations for revision. Consider printing out a teaching philosophy rubric from our “Rubrics and Samples” tab to provide your reviewer with guidelines to assess your draft. These exercises will give you the critical distance necessary to see your teaching philosophy objectively and revise it accordingly.
+ Rubrics and Samples
Rubrics and sample teaching philosophies.
Here are links to three teaching philosophy rubrics to help you assess your statement. We have included four different rubrics for you to choose from. These rubrics cover similar elements, and one is not necessarily better than the other. Your choice of which to use should be guided by how comfortable you feel with the particular instrument and how usable you find it.
- Teaching Philosophy Rubric 1 This rubric allows a reader to rate several elements of persuasiveness and format on a scale of 1 to 5.
- Teaching Philosophy Rubric 2 This rubric contains prompts for assessing purpose and audience, voice, beliefs and support, and conventions.
- Teaching Philosophy Rubric 3 This rubric contains prompts for assessing content, format, and writing quality.
- Rubric for Statements of Teaching Philosophy This rubric was developed by Kaplan et. al. from the University of Michigan.
- Marisol Brito – philosophy
- Benjamin Harrison – biology
- Jamie Peterson – psychology
- The University of Michigan has a wide variety of samples organized by field of study.
- Caroline Hilk
- Why Use Active Learning?
- Successful Active Learning Implementation
- Addressing Active Learning Challenges
- Research and Resources
- Addressing Challenges
- Course Planning
- Align Assessments
- Multiple Low Stakes Assessments
- Authentic Assessments
- Formative and Summative Assessments
- Varied Forms of Assessments
- Cumulative Assessments
- Equitable Assessments
- Essay Exams
- Multiple Choice Exams and Quizzes
- Academic Paper
- Skill Observation
- Alternative Assessments
- Assessment Plan
- Grade Assessments
- Prepare Students
- Reduce Student Anxiety
- SRT Scores: Interpreting & Responding
- Student Feedback Question Prompts
- Definitions and PWI Focus
- A Flexible Framework
- Class Climate
- Course Content
- An Ongoing Endeavor
- Working memory
- Retrieval of information
- Spaced practice
- Active learning
- Metacognition
- Research Questions and Design
- Gathering data
- Publication
- Learn About Your Context
- Design Your Course to Support Challenging Conversations
- Design Your Challenging Conversations Class Session
- Use Effective Facilitation Strategies
- What to Do in a Challenging Moment
- Debrief and Reflect On Your Experience, and Try, Try Again
- Supplemental Resources
- Why Use Team Projects?
- Project Description Examples
- Project Description for Students
- Team Projects and Student Development Outcomes
- Forming Teams
- Team Output
- Individual Contributions to the Team
- Individual Student Understanding
- Supporting Students
- Wrapping up the Project
- GRAD 8101: Teaching in Higher Education
- Finding a Practicum Mentor
- GRAD 8200: Teaching for Learning
- Proficiency Rating & TA Eligibility
- Schedule a SETTA
- TAPD Webinars
![what is a personal philosophy of education Caduceus International Publishing](https://www.cipcourses.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/caduceus_international_publishing_logo.png)
Developing a Personal Teaching Philosophy Statement
August 2, 2021.
Have you ever been asked about your teaching philosophy by a potential employer? Oftentimes, teachers are asked to include their teaching philosophy statement as part of their application or interviewing process.
If you haven’t defined your personal teaching philosophy, let’s break down how to develop and refine your statement — and why it’s so valuable to have one.
What is personal teaching philosophy?
A statement of teaching philosophy, or teaching statement , is a summation of your teaching strategies, beliefs, and practices, along with concrete examples of the ways those beliefs materialize in the learning environment, curriculum development, and more. It is developed over the course of an educator’s career and experiences, and it stays dynamic and “living” throughout their years in education. Whether you work in primary school or higher education, a personal teaching philosophy is applicable and valuable for all educators.
Put simply, your personal teaching philosophy is part of what makes you a unique and extraordinary educator. It is both your “why” and your “how.”
What are the elements of a personal teaching philosophy?
A taaching statement describes your concept of teaching and learning , your understanding of the learning process, your approach to facilitating successful learning, your goals for your students, how you set them, and how you measure success. It also describes your teaching methods and strategy, and your professional growth goals and aspirations.
Other common elements of a personal teaching philosophy statement include:
- Your definition of good teaching — along with an explanation of why you define it that way.
- In that same vein: how do you implement your version of good teaching? How do you measure your effectiveness as a teacher?
- Who have you taught? Who are your students? What have their unique goals and learning challenges taught you about teaching and learning?
- Your goals — what are your goals for improving your teaching?
What is an example of a teaching philosophy?
Your teaching philosophy statement should include an introduction, body, and a conclusion.
Introduction. What will your students take away from your class? How will your guidance impact them? Discuss your general belief about education as well as your ideals. For example, your introduction might read something like:
I believe that education is a right, not a privilege. Working in low-income districts has revealed many gaps and cracks (in the curricula, community resources, and more) that my students are more at risk of falling into. In order to prioritize inclusion and equity for my students, I believe in engaging in deeper listening, intentional reflection, and continuous growth. It is my role as an educator to support and motivate my students to live authentically and courageously, to accept others despite the differences between them, and to immerse themselves in learning more about the world they live in — despite the fact that the world does not always make accommodations for them.
Body. Describe the ideal classroom/learning environment. What makes it ideal? How do you bring it to fruition? Clearly state your goals and objectives for students.
The ideal learning environment is endlessly engaging and fun. My curricula always consist of hands-on, project-based learning. My classroom acts as a safe space for students to express themselves, even when they’re struggling. To ensure that this occurs, I commit to using only positive teaching rather than punishment and discipline, being emotionally available to my students and weaving in emotional intelligence into our lessons, and developing and packaging a curriculum that is considerate and representative of the diversity in the classroom and the community at large.
Conclusion. What are your goals as a teacher? What is your unique approach to reaching these goals? End strong. Tell them what makes you stand out as an educator.
My goal as an educator has always been the same: Do right by my students. However, how this materializes has evolved over the years. I make sure that my students understand that I am their teacher — not their friend — but that teachers can be mentors, guides, and trusted guardians. I foster relationships with each student so that I can better understand their needs and teach and support them accordingly. I promise to always take the time and effort to provide individual attention so that each and every student can thrive.
Check out a few solid examples of personal teaching statements on ThoughtCo.
How to describe your teaching style
If you’re having trouble concretely defining your personal teaching philosophy, try asking some of these reflective questions for inspiration:
- Who of my teachers, professors, or mentors in education have inspired me? How?
- How do I approach situations in which a student is struggling or falling behind?
- To what standards do I hold myself and my students? How do I foster an inclusive classroom environment and address diverse learning needs?
- What would my students, colleagues, or employers say about me and my teaching style?
- What are my most successful (or memorable) teaching moments?
Why having a teaching philosophy statement is important
Your personal teaching philosophy is important for both you and your students, primarily because it guides your practices in the classroom in a very real way. For employers, it provides context as to your teaching style and serves as a concrete way to gauge whether or not you’re a good fit for their school or organization. But your teaching philosophy also shapes how you inject your identity into your teaching, how you put your values and beliefs into practice, and how you develop as a professional. It also allows for and encourages continuous reflection , which is arguably the most important element of teaching and learning.
Guidelines for writing your teaching philosophy statement
Although there are no hard-and-fast rules for formatting your statement of personal teaching philosophy, there are generally agreed-upon guidelines to making your statement have the most impact:
- Grab the reader’s attention from the start. It doesn’t have to be dry or stiff. Make it your own.
- Keep it brief and concise. For hiring purposes, teaching statements should typically be 1 to 2 double-sided pages in length. Include generous white space by ensuring your line spacing is 1.15 or higher. This will allow the reader to scan the statement with ease.
- Write your statement from the first-person point of view — this is about you , after all.
- Be authentic. Avoid using cliches about how passionate you are about teaching.
- Use concrete examples. Don’t just write about hypotheticals.
- Don’t summarize your résumé or CV. The contents of your teaching statement should not be found anywhere else in your application materials.
- Avoid using jargon and technical terms. It can be clunky in this context.
- Demonstrate your humility and willingness to learn from your students and colleagues to improve and adapt throughout your teaching career.
- Revise and iterate as necessary. Both teaching and writing are continuously evolving and reflective processes, so don’t feel like your teaching strategy and philosophy can’t evolve with you.
The process of developing a teaching philosophy is ongoing. Every teaching experience and interaction with students and colleagues can impact your teaching philosophy. The first version of your personal teaching philosophy statement may not ring true years down the road, but that’s okay. Think of it as a reminder of how you’re evolving in the ever-changing field of education. Good luck!
Are you an educator looking for turn-key curriculum solutions for your health science course?
- Business of Higher Education
- Digital Education
- Digital Learning
- Digital Teaching
- Health Science Education
- Online Learning
- Uncategorized
RELATED STORIES
![what is a personal philosophy of education Multiethnic students standing with small flags of their respective countries with a brick white wall background](https://www.cipcourses.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/09.2024-CIP_Teaching-Medical-Terminology-to-ELL-Students_Depositphotos_429881674_L-300x150.jpg)
Teaching Medical Terminology to ELL Students & Non-Native English Speakers
According to AAMC, 1 in 5 physicians in the United States were
![what is a personal philosophy of education closeup of a grey keyboard with a green button showing the International Symbol of Accessibility](https://www.cipcourses.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Prioritizing-Inclusivity-Crafting-Accessible-Online-Health-Science-Education_Depositphotos_66139049_l-2015-300x150.png)
Prioritizing Inclusivity: Crafting Accessible Online Health Science Education
Online education has remarkably broadened access to higher learning. The mere existence
![what is a personal philosophy of education closeup of a student writing and typing on a table with a bowl of fruit and a healthy entree in front of them](https://www.cipcourses.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/09.2024-CIP-Integrating-Sports-Nutrition-Depositphotos_100531762_L-300x150.jpg)
Integrating Sports Nutrition for Enhanced Student Alertness
College students may generally struggle with staying alert in class. Some may
Explore Jobs
- Jobs Near Me
- Remote Jobs
- Full Time Jobs
- Part Time Jobs
- Entry Level Jobs
- Work From Home Jobs
Find Specific Jobs
- $15 Per Hour Jobs
- $20 Per Hour Jobs
- Hiring Immediately Jobs
- High School Jobs
- H1b Visa Jobs
Explore Careers
- Business And Financial
- Architecture And Engineering
- Computer And Mathematical
Explore Professions
- What They Do
- Certifications
- Demographics
Best Companies
- Health Care
- Fortune 500
Explore Companies
- CEO And Executies
- Resume Builder
- Career Advice
- Explore Majors
- Questions And Answers
- Interview Questions
How To Answer “What Is Your Teaching Philosophy?” (With Examples)
- Why Do You Want To Be A Teacher?
- Why Do You Want To Be A Doctor?
- Police Officer Interview Questions
- Why Do You Want To Be A Police Officer?
- Why Do You Want To Be An Accountant?
- Sales Interview Questions
- Interview Questions For Managers
- Retail Interview Questions
- Teacher Interview Questions
- Accounting Interview Questions
- Teaching Philosophy Examples
- Management Philosophy Examples
- Leadership Philosophy
- What Does Customer Service Mean To You
Find a Job You Really Want In
Summary. When answering the interview question “what is your teaching philosophy?” you should state your philosophy right away and provide a logical explanation that reveals your values as an educator . You should finish with an example and provide a real life experience that illustrates how it can be used in a practical term. When you apply for a teaching position, you will be asked about your teaching philosophy. This may come in the form of an interview question or a written statement. In either case, it is necessary ahead of time to understand your own teaching philosophy. Not only will it help you land the job, but more importantly, it will help you be a better teacher. In fact, even if you are already a teacher with no interest in changing positions , it is good to review your teaching philosophy consistently. Such self-reflection will help you update your methods, hone your skills, and help you grow into the best teacher. Key Takeaways: When answering “What is your teaching philosophy?” make sure your answer is concise, logical, and connects back to your values as an educator. Provide a real life example that shows how you put your teaching philosophy in action. Avoid cliches and overtly memorized responses in your answer. Be ready to possible follow up questions that will expand upon your teaching philosophy. In This Article Skip to section How to Answer “What Is Your Teaching Philosophy?” Example Answers to “What Is Your Teaching Philosophy?” What Is a Teaching Philosophy? Common Mistakes to Avoid Tips for Answering This Interview Question Possible Follow Up Questions to “What Is Your Teaching Philosophy?” How to Answer “What is Your Teaching Philosophy?” Interview Questions FAQ References Sign Up For More Advice and Jobs Show More How to Answer “What Is Your Teaching Philosophy?”
You have to know what format you will be asked to answer the question, “What is your teaching philosophy?”. Many teaching applications may ask for a teaching philosophy statement , which is a written version of the question and therefore is slightly more in-depth.
In an interview scenario, like all interview questions , your answer needs to be clear and efficient while still highlighting a unique personality. The key to this is structure. If your answer has a logical structure, you can take the interviewer on a quick journey into your teaching approach.
The structure should look something like this:
Intro. State your philosophy right away. It should be direct and relatively short, maybe a sentence or two long.
Go in-depth. Once you state your philosophy, give a logical explanation of your philosophy that reveals your values as an educator. Connect your philosophy to reasons that are personally important to you.
Finish with an example . Use either a real-life experience or a hypothetical situation to illustrate how your philosophy should be used in practical term.
Example Answers to “What Is Your Teaching Philosophy?”
To help you with your interview preparation, here are four sample answers to the interview question “what is your teaching philosophy?”
My role as a teacher is to foster a desire to learn. This is achieved by recognizing there are multiple learning styles. Therefore it is my duty to meet the students in their learning style. I have accomplished this in the past by providing different options for review material before tests. I then kept track of which version each student preferred, which helped me focus on their specific educational needs.
This answer works because it acknowledges the challenge of balancing different learning styles. It shows a certain combination of flexibility and direction that, as a teacher, you must be prepared for.
I want my students to be critical thinkers and combine logic with empathy to become independent, compassionate, lifelong learners. This begins with a classroom that values individuality that creates buy-in from the students. I engage my students and pull from them their initial thoughts and opinions, and together, we will shape it in a constructive manner.
This is a good answer that focuses on the independence of the student. Such a philosophy can work well, particularly with older students who might desire their own freedom. Still, the answer recognizes the responsibility of the teacher to keep things constructive.
I believe a classroom is about building a community. This is the environment in which students begin to learn their roles in society. It is my job to be a role model and show a good system of morals. For example, in discussions regarding social injustice, whether in the textbook or the classroom, I will use it as an opportunity to promote a sense of unity and understanding.
Conversely, this answer takes a communal and moral approach to students. This may be more important for younger children who need firmer guidance in their development. Taking a moral stance shows that you see that the role of a teacher goes beyond instruction.
As a teacher, I want to grow alongside my students. They can offer me new perspectives on the material and help me improve my teaching skills. Therefore, my philosophy is based on the idea that feedback from students is just as important as giving feedback to students. Periodically during the year, I will ask for feedback from my students to review my teaching and to discover new ideas.
This is a unique take that shows the benefits students have to offer to teachers. With this approach, students are given a say in the direction of their education, and the teacher can grow from the process. This is a good philosophy for those who wish the classroom to be open and welcoming.
What Is a Teaching Philosophy?
A teaching philosophy is your personal belief system on how to handle an educational role. Your philosophy reveals what you value , what you think is ethical, and what you believe the overall purpose of teaching is. A well-defined teaching philosophy will succinctly sum up what effective teaching looks like to you.
It is important to know that teaching philosophy is different from a pedagogical philosophy. Pedagogy is about the abstract theory of teaching, whereas a teaching philosophy is personal and pertains to you. You may use pedagogy elements in your teaching philosophy, but it is important to highlight your own unique personality to stand out.
A teaching philosophy will contain a combination of theory and experience. These experiences include your educational background , your previous professional experience , and your own time as a student.
Since a teaching philosophy results from many different theories and experiences, you may want to consider several factors to help connect these different influences into one clear statement. To do so, consider:
Teachers who inspired you.
Your concept of learning.
Successful moments of teaching.
The rewards of teaching.
The standards of teaching.
How you handle difficult situations with students.
How you want your students to think of you.
How you define those factors begins to reveal who you are as a teacher . You may begin to see themes between them. Use these themes to create an overarching thesis. This thesis becomes your teaching philosophy.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Cliches. If your philosophy is based on a generic statement, you are unable to create a meaningful discussion. A cliche may present an unrealistic expectation of the situation or an obvious belief that everybody else agrees. Worst of all, a cliche will not make you unique in the interview .
Memorized responses. Although you want to practice your answer, do not pressure yourself to hit the response line by line. Play to your audience and be your natural self. It only makes sense to be personable while you talk about something personal to you.
Tangential responses. Stay focused and be wary of taking your philosophy into unrelated directions. It can be tempting since your answer may bring up memories or other important beliefs, but you must stay with the task at hand. Get your answer in and out in a reasonable time.
Tips for Answering This Interview Question
Be concise. A long-winded, rambling answer may give the impression that you have not considered the question ahead of time. That said, if you rush through your words, you may upset the interviewer .
Speak plainly. Successful communication also comes from connecting with diverse audiences when building concise communication. Again, this is an important skill as a teacher, so here is a chance to highlight your ability to use common, everyday language to dissect complex topics.
Be humble. Show that you are aware of the gravity of the role of teaching without appearing arrogant or smug. Your teaching philosophy likely incorporates a variety of selfless qualities, so show some self-awareness and recognize that your role will be one of stewardship for others.
Be positive. Nothing will concern an interviewer more if you are cynical and negative in an interview where the job requires a strong sense of empathy and selflessness. This does not mean you can’t, nor should, ignore the challenges of the profession.
Practice your answer. Prior to the interview, ensure you practice the answers to some relevant questions. You can practice either with a relative or a friend. But if you don’t have that opportunity, practice in front of a mirror or, better yet, record yourself on the phone and listen back again.
Possible Follow Up Questions to “What Is Your Teaching Philosophy?”
Be prepared for possible follow up questions that will transition the interview into new topics. Some to be prepared for are:
Why did you decide to become a teacher?
What is your personal learning style?
Where do you see yourself in the next five years?
What do you think the biggest challenge for a student is?
Tell me about a previous challenge you have faced.
Make sure to show consistency and use your teaching philosophy as the guiding principle to all other answers.
How to Answer “What is Your Teaching Philosophy?” Interview Questions FAQ
What are the types of teaching philosophies?
Three types of teaching philosophies include:
Behaviorism. The behaviorist school of thought is that students and children learn different behaviors through their interactions with others. The environment that they are in has a lot to do with their behaviors and can have a direct impact on it.
Essentialism. This will focus on the teaching of core basic subjects and skills. This is where common core of knowledge is passed and transmitted to students. This is an important philosophy of teaching.
Progressivism. This philosophy focuses on the whole child rather than the content that is being taught or the teacher. Students should have the ability to test ideas by active experimentation or by asking questions. It’s the teachers responsibility to provide answers to those questions.
What should you do to prepare for an interview?
To help prepare for an interview you should review the job description, research the company and the position, and go over common interview questions. It’s also important that you prepare some questions to ask the interviewer. These questions should come from doing research on the company and the position.
You should also prepare hard copies of your resume and other materials that you may be required to bring to the interview. On the day of the interview you should dress professionally and arrive between 10 to 15 minutes before the start of the interview.
What are common teacher interview questions?
Some common teacher interview questions are:
How do you use or plan to use technology in the classroom?
How do you feel about classroom observations and walk-throughs?
What are some methods that you use to check for understanding as you are teaching?
How do you plan on engaging reluctant learners?
Tell me about a mistake you made with a student. What happened and how did you address it?
What motivates you ?
We Are Teachers – 30 Interview Questions Every Teach Must Be Able To Answer (Plus 5 To Ask!)
University of Idaho – 50 Common Interview Questions
How useful was this post?
Click on a star to rate it!
Average rating / 5. Vote count:
No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.
![what is a personal philosophy of education ' src=](https://www.zippia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/chris-kolmar.jpeg)
Chris Kolmar is a co-founder of Zippia and the editor-in-chief of the Zippia career advice blog. He has hired over 50 people in his career, been hired five times, and wants to help you land your next job. His research has been featured on the New York Times, Thrillist, VOX, The Atlantic, and a host of local news. More recently, he's been quoted on USA Today, BusinessInsider, and CNBC.
![what is a personal philosophy of education Responsive Image](https://www.zippia.com/wp-content/themes/zippia-react/img/ad_bottom_desktop.webp)
Related posts
![what is a personal philosophy of education Management Philosophy](https://www.zippia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/what-is-a-management-philosophy-with-examples.png)
What Is A Management Philosophy? (With Examples)
![what is a personal philosophy of education](https://www.zippia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/16-retail-job-interview-questions-with-example-answers.png)
16 Retail Job Interview Questions (With Example Answers)
![what is a personal philosophy of education](https://www.zippia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/how-to-describe-your-current-job-duties-with-examples.png)
How To Describe Your Current Job Duties (With Examples)
![what is a personal philosophy of education](https://www.zippia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/what-are-they-asking.jpg)
How To Answer “What Skills Would You Bring To The Job?” (With Examples)
- Career Advice >
- Interview Questions >
- What Is Your Teaching Philosophy
![what is a personal philosophy of education Resilient Educator logo](https://resilienteducator.com/wp-content/themes/resilient-educator/images/resilient-educator-logo.png)
ChatGPT for Teachers
Trauma-informed practices in schools, teacher well-being, cultivating diversity, equity, & inclusion, integrating technology in the classroom, social-emotional development, covid-19 resources, invest in resilience: summer toolkit, civics & resilience, all toolkits, degree programs, trauma-informed professional development, teacher licensure & certification, how to become - career information, classroom management, instructional design, lifestyle & self-care, online higher ed teaching, current events, what is a teaching philosophy statement and why do i need it.
There is a core belief behind every educator. We all have known teachers who are simply amazing. They inspire, they impart knowledge and they add value to their students’ lives. These individuals understand the sacrifice and dedication one must make in order to be successful in the lives they touch.
Teaching is rewarding, exciting, and ever-changing. But it isn’t a perfect career. And there are days all teachers grow weary and tired. Many educators feel undervalued and overworked. The job of a teacher is never done. That’s why it is important that an educator have a “teaching philosophy statement” that will help them stay focused on the good, great, hard and challenging days. This important statement is a reflection of the writer.
Why have a teaching philosophy?
Teachers who perform with a purpose will find themselves more focused, rejuvenated and excited. Through the various highs and lows, a teaching philosophy or “mission statement” helps an educator stay true to one’s core beliefs.
Writing a teaching philosophy statement may take some time, but most instructors will find the process easy once they pause and think about what drew them to this field in the first place. Reflecting on core values and beliefs about education and the role of educators can bring life and direction to any statement.
Who needs a teaching philosophy?
Every educator benefits from creating a philosophical teaching statement. New graduates and tenured professors alike can grow by thinking upon, summarizing, and defining their personal beliefs in how they best teach.
This reflective process should be revisited over and over again. People change and their values evolve. Professional growth will be reflected in a philosophy that is constantly updated and maintained. Teachers should remember this statement is always a work in progress.
What should be included in a teaching philosophy statement?
A teaching philosophy statement is a clear and concise one- to two-page account of your teaching methods and expertise. These statements do not fit into a cookie-cutter mold and each one should be unique.
At the very least, statements should address foundational questions:
- Why do you teach?
- What do you teach?
- How do you teach?
- How do you measure your own effectiveness?
Great teaching philosophy statements include specific examples of course topics, assignments, assessments and strategies drawn from actual courses and curriculum. These examples demonstrate the range of expertise and illustrate objectives, methods and approaches. Supporting documents, such as class syllabi, assignments, exams, evaluations and graded student papers may offer additional insights.
Additionally, these four tips can help boost a statement even further:
- Include your core beliefs of how education works best (do not be tempted to follow the latest educational fads).
- Avoid teacher jargon. Make your own voice come alive in your statement.
- Highlight your own personal strengths and show how they play into your success as an educator.
Who is the audience?
When formulating ideas, the intended audience of a teaching philosophy statement must be taken into consideration. Audience members look to pull key insights from the statement:
- Can they handle the teaching responsibilities of the job?
- Does their teaching approach fit in with the department and our students?
- Does this person want to teach, and why?
- What will this person add to the department? What will the students gain from his/her classes?
- How does this person handle the challenges of a classroom and teaching?
How to get started
The process of beginning a teaching philosophy statement is understandably intimidating. Consider some of the following strategies to spur ideas for the first draft.
- Write a letter to someone outside the teaching world on the joys and challenges of teaching.
- Make a list of the qualities of an effective teacher.
- Write about a memorable experience in the classroom. Consider what happened and what you might do differently and why.
- Develop a “dream course” in which you have a chosen topic and create goals to achieve it in terms of helping the students to learn and how you would research these interests within the scope of your personal teaching approach.
- Imagine yourself in your first academic position and how you would proceed teaching in your chosen field of study and organize a graduate-level seminar.
- Begin with the concrete details of what sets you apart as a teacher. How would someone observing you describe your teaching style? What specific skills and knowledge will students gain in your classroom and what kinds of things will happen in your classroom?
Personal and professional growth comes from high standards, an open mind and self-reflection. A teaching philosophy statement is an incredible tool that can help an educator reach their full potential.
You may also like to read
- How to Write a Teaching Philosophy Statement for an Elementary Educator
- Tips for Writing an Effective Teaching and Research Statement
- How to Develop a Philosophy of Teaching for Early Childhood Education
- Teaching License Reciprocity Explained
- Summer Teacher Prep: Creating a Teacher Mission Statement
- Quality Professional Development: How to Really Grow in Your Teaching Practice
![what is a personal philosophy of education Explore careers and degrees on Noodle.com - Find your next career](https://resilienteducator.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/noodle_ad_728x180.png)
Categorized as: Teaching Careers and Professional Development
Tagged as: New Teacher , Postsecondary (Advanced Education)
- Online & Campus Master's in Environmental Edu...
- Online & Campus Master's in Education Leaders...
- Math Teaching Resources | Classroom Activitie...
![what is a personal philosophy of education Logo for Open Oregon Educational Resources](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/2022/05/cropped-Open-Oregon-for-lights.png)
3 Educational Philosophies
“Theories are more than academic words that folx with degrees throw around at coffee shops and poetry slams; they work to explain to us how the world works, who the world denies, and how the structures uphold oppression.”
Bettina L. Love, 2019
![what is a personal philosophy of education](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/Two_silhouette_profile_or_a_white_vase-300x212.jpg)
Learning Objectives
- Learn the four key Educational Philosophies
- Explore non-systemically dominant educational systems and their philosophical roots
- Compare how the privileging of educational thought and philosophy in the US is based in social, political, and economic power
- Develop an initial personal philosophy of education through self-reflection and self examination taking into account narratives and counterstories
Activity – Educational Philosophy Assessment
In order to start reflecting on your own philosophy of education, complete the following:
- Educational Philosophies Self Assessment – https://evaeducation.weebly.com/uploads/1/9/6/9/19692577/self_assessment.pdf
- Scoring Guide for the Self Assessment: https://evaeducation.weebly.com/uploads/1/9/6/9/19692577/self_assessment_scoring_guide.pdf
What does this survey reveal about your underlying philosophy?
Do you agree or disagree with this assessment? Explain.
What might this survey reveal with your reasons in becoming a teacher?
Foundations of Educational Philosophy
Pause and Ponder – Education
You may have heard comments implying that education in the United States is not political, separate from religion, and accessible to everyone. The reality is that from its early existence in the western hemisphere in the 1600s, it was indeed political, religious, and accessible only to a select few. These traits continue to influence the evolution of education in the United States today.
The education system in the United States is a social institution. A social institution is a pattern of behaviors and social arrangements that have evolved to meet the needs of society. Quite often, how those needs are defined in official conversations is dependent on who has the social, economic, and legal power to do the defining.
Given this, and since the current system in the US was derived from a system that was explicitly designed to reproduce wealth and privilege for societal elites, it should be no surprise that the foundational theorists upon which the US education rests are representative of a narrow range of perspectives on education. Many educational approaches, perspectives, and philosophies have been neglected in the development of the US system. For instance, the educational system in the US is not rooted at all in the philosophies of Aztec or Mayan civilizations. Nor does it include understandings about teaching, learning, or intellectual growth from Muslim, Hindu, or Yoruba societies. It is accurate to say the US system of education and the philosophies on which it rests are decidedly Eurocentric.
Critical Lens – Eurocentrism
Eurocentrism (also Eurocentricity) is a worldview that is centered on or privileges European-based civilization or a biased view that favors it over nonEuropean-based civilizations.
In order to understand the educational system in the US in a way that supports educators in meeting the needs of all students, we offer the following orientation to the educational philosophies on which this system was founded.
A philosophy grounds or guides practice in the study of existence and knowledge while developing an ontology (the study of being) on what it means for something or someone to be—or exist. Educational philosophy, then, provides a foundation which constructs and guides the ways knowledge is generated and passed on to others. Therefore, when thinking and reflecting about your own philosophy of education, you need to acknowledge your values, beliefs and attitudes towards the educational system, as this will guide your practice. Therefore, it is of critical importance that teachers begin to develop a clear understanding of philosophical traditions and how the philosophical underpinnings inform their educational philosophies. Philosophies need to translate ideas into action. If you want to use certain techniques, then you need to understand how they are effective in the classroom to create that portion of your education philosophy.
Over the course of history, philosophy has experienced several paradigm shifts that influence teaching and learning. Philosophical traditions from the 19th century helped anchor the early foundations of educational philosophy and the development of public education in Europe and the United States.
Activity – Think and Reflect
Think and reflect on the following guiding questions:
- What does being a teacher mean to you?
- What are the skills that, from your perspective, effective teachers have?
- What should be taught?
- How should it be taught?
- What is knowledge?
- Why is it important to establish a trusting relationships between students, teachers and the community?
Whether you are aware or not, you have begun writing philosophical statements about education and being a teacher.
3.1 Philosophical Perspectives of Education
As students ourselves, we may have a particular notion of what schooling is and should be as well as what teachers do and should do. In his book entitled Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study, Dan Lortie (1975) called this the “apprenticeship of observation” (p. 62). Many people who pursue teaching think they already know what it entails because they have generally spent at least 13 years observing teachers as they work. The role of a teacher can seem simplistic because as a student, you only see one piece of what teachers actually do day in and day out. This one-dimensional perspective can contribute to a person’s idea of what the role of teachers in schools is, as well as what the purpose of schooling should be. The idea of the purpose of schooling can also be seen as an individual’s philosophy of schooling.
Philosophy can be defined as the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality and existence. In the case of education, one’s philosophy is what one believes to be true about the essentials of education. When thinking about your philosophy of education, consider your beliefs about the roles of schools, teachers, learners, families, and communities. There are four philosophical perspectives currently used in educational settings: essentialism, perennialism, progressivism, and social reconstructionism/critical pedagogy. Unlike the more abstract philosophical perspectives of ontology and axiology, these four perspectives focus primarily on what should be taught and how it should be taught, i.e. the curriculum. These are explained below.
3.2 Four Key Educational Philosophies
Essentialism.
Essentialism adheres to a belief that a core set of essential skills must be taught to all students. Essentialists tend to privilege traditional academic disciplines that will develop prescribed skills and objectives in different content areas as well as develop a common culture. Typically, Essentialism argues for a back-to-basics approach on teaching intellectual and moral standards. Schools should prepare all students to be productive members of society. The Essentialist curriculum focuses on reading, writing, computing clearly and logically about objective facts concerning the real world. Schools should be sites of rigor where students learn to work hard and respect authority. Because of this stance, Essentialism tends to subscribe to tenets of Realism. Essentialist classrooms tend to be teacher-centered in instructional delivery with an emphasis on lecture and teacher demonstrations.
Perennialism:
Perennialism advocates for seeking, teaching, and learning universal truths that span across historical time periods. These truths, Perennialists argue, have everlasting importance in helping humans solve problems regardless of time and place. While Perennialism resembles essentialism at first glance, Perennialism focuses on the individual development of the student rather than emphasizing skills. Perennialism supports liberal arts curricula that helps produce well-rounded individuals with some knowledge across the arts and sciences. All students should take classes in English Language Arts, foreign languages, mathematics, natural sciences, fine arts, and philosophy. Like Essentialism, Perennialism may tend to favor teacher-centered instruction; however, Perennialists do utilize student-centered instructional activities like Socratic Seminar, which values and encourages students to think, rationalize, and develop their own ideas on topics.
Progressivism
Progressivism focuses its educational stance toward experiential learning with a focus on developing the whole child. Students learn by doing rather than being lectured to by teachers. Curriculum is usually integrated across contents instead of siloed into different disciplines. Progressivism’s stance is in stark contrast to both Essentialism and Perennialism in this manner. Progressivism follows a clear pragmatic ontology where the learner focuses on solving real-world problems through real experiences. Progressivist classrooms are student-centered where students will work in cooperative/collaborative groups to do project-based, expeditionary, problem-based, and/or service-learning activities. In progressivist classrooms, students have opportunities to follow their interests and have shared authority in planning and decision making with teachers.
3.3 A Response to Dominant Systems:
Social reconstructionism.
Social reconstructionism was founded as a response to the atrocities of World War II and the Holocaust to assuage human cruelty. Social reform in response to helping prepare students to make a better world through instilling liberatory values. Critical pedagogy emerged from the foundation of the early social reconstructionist movement.
Critical Lens – Liberatory Thinking
“Liberatory thinking is the re- imagining of one’s assumptions and beliefs about others and their capabilities by interrupting internal beliefs that undermine productive relationships and actions. Liberatory thinking goes beyond simply changing mindsets to creating concrete opportunities for others to experience liberation. The opportunities provides cover for and centers underrepresented and marginalized people. It pushes people to interrogate their own multiple identities in relation to others and to think about the consequences of our actions, especially for students of critical need. It explores how mindsets can impede or ignite progress in the classroom, school, and district.”
Chicago Public Schools
For more information in Liberatory Thinking, please refer to the Equity Framework from the Chicago Public Schools
Critical Pedagogy
Critical pedagogy is the application of critical theory to education. For critical pedagogues, teaching and learning is inherently a political act and they declare that knowledge and language are not neutral, nor can they be objective. Therefore, issues involving social, environmental, or economic justice cannot be separated from the curriculum. Critical pedagogy’s goal is to emancipate marginalized or oppressed groups by developing, according to Paulo Freire, conscientização, or critical consciousness in students.
Critical pedagogy de-centers the traditional classroom, which positions teachers at the center. The curriculum and classroom with a critical pedagogy stance is student-centered and focuses its content on social critique and political action.
3.4 Ways of Knowing
Pause and Ponder – Ways of Knowing
In addition to the historically neglected thinkers and the theories presented above, it is important for educators to consider that there are many ways of knowing and acquiring knowledge
How do you know something is true?
In the US school system, for instance, students begin the day when a bell or signal goes off at the same predetermined time every day. This scheduling system shapes students’ awareness of how days in their lives will most likely be structured. Consider an alternative: What would happen if the school day started every day when the sun passes a certain point across the horizon. What would students learn about the world? How would students’ way of knowing about time and responsibility be changed?
Critical Lens – Cultural Practices
Here are two news stories with examples of cultural practices that are not taught in mainstream schools because they have been steered away from in this imperialistic, colonizing culture. Nevertheless, they have been sustained by thinkers and teachers and continue to be sustained today.
Culturally informed childbirth practices: Navajo woman starts nonprofit to improve maternal health
Traditional care of the land: For tribes, ‘good fire’ a key to restoring nature and people
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
3.5 Educational Thinkers
The thinkers and perspectives in the preceding section of this text are considered foundational thinkers in mainstream formal education in the US, other thinkers from the same time period and throughout history are considered foundational contributors to education throughout the world. Some of this has to do with the notion of US colonialism, imperialism, exceptionalism (the belief that the United States is either distinctive, unique, or exemplary compared to other nations), and the legacy of the enslavement of Black Americans in the United States. Because of these legacies, very few people of color were accepted into the cannon of formal educational thinkers. As a result, the US system has been shaped by a very narrow sample of foundational theorists, and many educators who trained in the 20th and 21st centuries in the US had their perspectives formed under this narrow umbrella.
The following individuals and theories are presented so that you can broaden your perspective and better serve all students during your career in education.
![what is a personal philosophy of education William Edward Burghardt Du Bois](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/download-9.jpg)
William Edward Burghardt Du Bois
Du Bois was an American sociologist, historian and Pan-Africanist civil rights activist. Du Bois completed his graduate work at the University of Berlin and Harvard University, where he was the first African American to earn a doctorate. He became a professor of history, sociology and economics at Atlanta University. Du Bois was one of the founders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1909.
In an effort to portray the genius and humanity of the Black race, Du Bois published The Souls of Black Folk (1903), a collection of 14 essays. The introduction of the book famously proclaimed that “the problem of the Twentieth Century is the problem of the color line.” Each chapter begins with two epigraphs – one from a White poet, and one from a Black spiritualist – to demonstrate intellectual and cultural parity between Black and White cultures.
A major theme of The Souls of Black Folk is the double consciousness faced by African Americans: being both American and Black. This was a unique identity which, according to Du Bois, had been a handicap in the past, but could be a strength in the future: “Henceforth, the destiny of the race could be conceived as leading neither to assimilation nor separatism but to proud, enduring hyphenation.”
Double consciousness is the internal conflict experienced by subordinated or colonized groups in an oppressive society. Originally, double consciousness was specifically the psychological challenge African Americans experienced of “always looking at oneself through the eyes” of a racist white society and “measuring oneself by the means of a nation that looked back in contempt”. The term also referred to Du Bois’s experiences of reconciling his African heritage with an upbringing in a European-dominated society.
More recently, the concept of double consciousness has been expanded to other situations of social inequality, notably women living in patriarchal societies as well as LGBTQ2S+ people living in homophobic and transphobic societies.
The idea of double consciousness is important because it illuminates the experiences of Black people living in post-slavery America, and also because it sets a framework for understanding the position of oppressed people in an oppressive world. As a result, it became used to explain the dynamics of gender, colonialism, xenophobia and more alongside race. This theory laid a strong foundation for other critical theorists to expand upon.
Carter Godwin Woodson
![what is a personal philosophy of education Carter Godwin Woodson](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/download-1-5.jpg)
Woodson was an American educator, historian, author, and the founder of the Association for the Study of African American Life and History. He achieved a graduate degree at the University of Chicago and in 1912 was the second African American, after W. E. B. Du Bois , to obtain a PhD from Harvard University . Woodson remains the only person whose parents were enslaved in the United States to obtain a PhD . He taught at two historically Black colleges: “ Howard University and West Virginia State University ”. Woodson believed that education and increasing social and professional contacts among Black and white people could reduce racism, and he promoted the organized study of African-American history partly for that purpose. He would later promote the first Negro History Week in Washington, D.C., in 1926, forerunner of Black History Month.
Woodson published The Education of the Negro Prior to 1861. Believing that history belonged to everybody, not just the historians, Woodson sought to engage Black civic leaders, high school teachers, clergy, women’s groups and fraternal associations in his project to improve the understanding of African-American history. He founded the Association for the Study of African American Life and History whose purpose he described as the “scientific study” of the “neglected aspects of Negro life and history” by training a new generation of Black people in historical research and methodology
![what is a personal philosophy of education bell hooks](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/download-10.jpg)
hooks is a US based educational theorist and social activist. In Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom, she argues that a teacher’s use of control over students dulls the students’ enthusiasm and teaches obedience to authority, and keeps students from learning critical thinking. hook’s pedagogical practices exist as an interplay of anti-colonial, critical, and feminist pedagogies and are based on freedom. hooks also built a bridge between critical thinking and real-life situations, to enable educators to show students the everyday world instead of the stereotypical perspective of the world. hooks argues that teachers and students should engage in interrogations of cultural assumptions that are supported by oppression.
note: bell hooks intentionally does not capitalize her name, which follows her critical stance that language, even how we write one’s own name, is political and ideological.
Henry Giroux
![what is a personal philosophy of education Henry Giroux](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/download-11.jpg)
Giroux is a foundational critical theorist in the US and Canada, best known for his pioneering work in critical pedagogy in K-12 and higher ed. His work advocates supporting students developing a consciousness of freedom and connecting knowledge to power, and the ability to take constructive action. His latest work examines the pitting of people against each other through the lens of class, race, and any other differences that don’t embrace white nationalism.
3.6 Latin American Thinkers
We will now analyze the impact of the pedagogical practice, as well as the educational thought, of different key educators in Latin America. These educators influenced a cultural change with ideas and concepts that modified the parameters of the educational system that was established in LatinAmerica.
Some of these educators have not been recognized in the educational system around the world. However, their work has been a catalyst in giving way to cultural and educational transformations in Latin America. The following educators stand out for their innovative tendencies who fought for an educational system to which all people had access.
When studying these Latin American educators, it should be noted that they generated a change that had a great impact on socio-cultural problems and that their success, or failure, depended on the government policies carried out in the corresponding countries.
Deeper Dive – Latin American Thinkers
You can watch the history of each Latin American thinkers in Spanish in the following video:
Paulo Reglus Neves Freire
![what is a personal philosophy of education Paulo Freire](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/download-12.jpg)
Freire is a Brazilian philosopher and educator, was one of the most influential thinkers behind social reconstructionism. He criticized the banking model of education in his best known writing, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, which is generally considered one of the fundamental texts of the critical pedagogy movement. Banking models of education view students as empty vessels to be filled by the teacher’s expertise, like a teacher putting “coins” of information into the students’ “piggy banks.” Instead, Freire supported problem-posing models of education that recognized the prior knowledge everyone has and can share with others. Conservative critics of social reconstructionists suggest that they have abandoned intellectual pursuits in education, whereas social reconstructionists believe that the analyzing of moral decisions leads to being good citizens in a democracy.
The installment dedicated to Paulo Freire covers the different stages of the life of the Brazilian pedagogue and politician. The documentary shows his Christian roots and his first steps related to literacy and adult education in Brazil, especially the one carried out in Angicos. Then, it continues with Freire’s years in exile, which included a diverse tour of Chile, the US, Nicaragua, etc. and the publication, in 1970, of two of his most important works: Education as a practice for freedom and Pedagogy of the oppressed. At the same time, it is argued that these works strengthened a political idea that became the organizer of the movement of the oppressed in Latin America.
Pause and Ponder – Dominant Narrative
The work of Freire, Giroux, and hooks are included as necessary responses to the exclusionary and marginalizing nature of the dominant narrative of educational systems. Even today, although educators may study their work, the systems they’re employed with tend to perpetuate the inequalities and dynamics Freire, Giroux, hooks, and others address.
Gabriela Mistral
![what is a personal philosophy of education Gabriela Mistral](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/download-1-6.jpg)
Mistral, pseudonym of Lucila Godoy Alcayaga, was a Chilean poet, diplomat and pedagogue. She received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1945 for her poetic work, she was the first Ibero-American woman and the second Latin American person to receive a Nobel Prize.
Her political-ideological profile is represented as a hybrid between her Catholic, but not conservative, beliefs and her liberal traits, although she is not strictly defined as liberal. Her words and poetry, which frequently gave life to various newspaper articles, generated multiple conflicts with the most conservative sectors of society. Mistral, however, continued on her way and affirmed her work in the rural and indigenous sectors. During her trip to Mexico, at the invitation of Vasconcelos, she fulfilled her full potential as a teacher, promoting a pedagogy based on the child, with Christian roots and that took into account the singularities of the rural and indigenous areas in which she worked. In 1945 she became the first woman to receive the Nobel Prize for Literature, something that made visible the impact of her teaching practice, intellectual and poetic practice.
Domingo Faustino Sarmiento
![what is a personal philosophy of education Sarmiento](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/download-1-7.jpg)
Sarmiento was an Argentine politician, writer, teacher, journalist, serviceman and statesman; governor of the province of San Juan between 1862 and 1864, president of the Argentine Nation between 1868 and 1874, national senator for his province between 1874 and 1879 and minister of the interior in 1879.
His controversial, anti-racist and unitary side is reaffirmed, and the fact that he belongs to a generation that understood writing as a political practice. He questioned what was the best educational system for all of the students in Latina America. He starts investigating the opposite approaches of education in Massachusetts and Prussia. He believed that the students had a better option to succeed and learn independently in a society under the Prussian system, which was centralized and under the management of the state. The educational system in Massachusetts, on the contrary, was decentralized and the society was the principal entity to promote education. Therefore, the habits of each state were instilled in the students. For example, a republican state will have a republican approach to education and he did not agree with this approach. Therefore, after his investigations he laid the programmatic foundations of a national educational system, in where it was centralized and Popular Education was provided to all of the children in Argentina.
Later on, his side as a statesman is taken up again with the contributions he made in the elaboration of the Law of Common Education of Buenos Aires (1875) and the sanction under his presidency of the National Law of Common Education (1884).
Jesualdo Sosa
Sosa, better known as Jesualdo, was a Uruguayan teacher, writer, pedagogue and journalist. His teaching led him to dedicate himself with greater purpose and knowledge on the activities, interests and needs of the child.
Starting from a critique of the traditional school and the capitalist system, Sosa combined there a proposal with Escolanovist overtones, which promoted the autonomy of children, their creativity, their expression, their work training, and was articulated with the activities of the community. That experience was collected in Vida de un maestro, a production that, despite the censorship attempts it suffered from dictatorial governments, was able to expand worldwide. After that publication, his life is described as a time of maturation, systematization and recognition, which gave him the chance to be called to collaborate in different parts of Latin America.
Simón Narciso de Jesús Carreño Rodríguez
![what is a personal philosophy of education Simon Rodriguez](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/Anonimo_010.jpg)
de Jesús Carreño Rodríguez was a Venezuelan hero, educator, and politician. He was the tutor of Simón Bolívar and Andrés Bello. He contributed concepts and ideas including written works aimed at the process of freedom and American integration.
In the seventh installment, Simón Rodríguez is recognized as a great precursor of our American pedagogical thought, as a fighter for the emancipation of Latin America and for public education for all as a form of social progress. His philosophy favored the equality in education as he believed this was a right for all citizens. He highlights his conception of equality, which was not restrictive as he believed that equality started in educational practices. He sacrificed all his belongings and left everything for his ideals. In the miniseries,
José Vasconcelos Calderón
![what is a personal philosophy of education Jose Vasconsuelos](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/Jose_Vasconcelos_portriat_c.1920s-224x300.jpg)
Vasconcelos Calderón was a Mexican lawyer, politician, writer, educator, public official and philosopher. He was part of the revolutionary movement led by Francisco Madero, which promoted the democratic transformation of a country that, at that time, was shaken by the dictatorships of Porfirio Díaz Mori. As a result of a political setup, Vasconcelos became Secretary of Education of the Federal Government (1921-1924). His management in this position is distinguished as short and intense, since there he carried out, with the support of Gabriela Mistral, his most recognized work, promoting high culture, rural literacy missions and muralism as ways of recovering Latin American roots. His work, The Cosmic Race, is considered a condensation of his position in favor of mestizaje, which is the biological and cultural encounter or its arrangement between different ethnic groups, in which they mix, giving birth to new species of families and new genotypes. This was a very controversial work as it was not aligned with the thinking of the people from this time.
José Carlos Mariátegui
Mariátegui, La Chira, was a Peruvian writer, journalist and political thinker, a prolific author despite his early death. He is also known in his country by the name of El Amauta. He was one of the main scholars of Socialism in Latin America.
![what is a personal philosophy of education Jose Carlos Mariategui](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/Jose_Carlos_Mariategui_in_1929-226x300.jpg)
“The revolution is not only the fight for bread, but also the conquest of beauty” is a representative phrase of José Carlos Mariátegui, which marks the beginning of the installment referring to the Peruvian writer, journalist and intellectual. At first, the documentary goes through what is considered his first school, recounting his initial steps in the writing of the newspaper La Razón, where he grew as a journalist and became involved in workers’ struggles and reformist ideals. Then it is analyzed how during his exile in Europe, Mariátegui was nurtured by Marxist ideas, the struggles of Italian workers and began to work on the notion of indigenism as a creative and revolutionary myth. During his return, it is stated that he strengthened his political proposal of autochthonous socialism, marked by a juxtaposition between Marxist theory, Latin Americanism and indigenism, with a strong emphasis also on gender equality and the depatriarchalizing of educational practices. These aspects are present in its most important editorial offering, Amauta. In 1928, he created the Peruvian Socialist Party and published Seven Interpretive Essays on Peruvian Reality, from which he criticized the liberal model of education (which placed the problem of indigenous people in education) and the lack of their recognition as subjects of law.
José Julián Martí Pérez
![what is a personal philosophy of education Jose Marti](https://openoregon.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/323/2023/07/MartiJohnManuel_K_TRestauration-247x300.jpg)
Martí Pérez was a writer and politician of Cuban origin. Democratic republican politician, thinker, journalist, philosopher and Cuban poet, creator of the Cuban Revolutionary Party and organizer of the War of 95 or Necessary War, named after the Cuban War of Independence. He suffered the vicissitudes of critical thought from a very young age, when he was imprisoned and exiled. Strongly involved in the struggles against Spanish colonization and US interference in the Caribbean, he claimed Bolivarian principles. His political and educational thought is described through four topics: the decolonization of Latin American knowledge, the formation of good people and the role of love in pedagogy, the special place given to creative work and the recovery of Latin American identity. In 1892, a time of exile, he founded the Cuban Revolutionary Party as a tool for the independence of the island and finally died on the battlefield years later.
Jorge J. E. Gracia
Gracia was born in Cuba in 1942 and was a Cuban refugee in the USA. He studied at both Universidad de La Habana and Escuela Nacional de Bellas Artes San Alejandro in Havana before moving to the U.S., where he earned a degree in philosophy from Wheaton College in 1965. He went on to receive a master’s degree in philosophy from University of Chicago in 1966, a licentiate in medieval studies from Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies in 1970 and his doctorate in medieval philosophy from University of Toronto in 1971.
Gracia’s areas of research included metaphysics, ethnic and racial issues, philosophy of religion, and medieval and Latin American philosophy. These topics led him to author over 20 books and edit more than two dozen volumes of works by others. One of his most notable contributions was his 1984 edited anthology on Latin American philosophy, “Philosophical Analysis in Latin America,” which was the first work of its kind published in English by a philosopher.
Beyond his vast collection of writings, he was also a leader for many important organizations. He was the founding chair for the American Philosophical Association’s Committee for Hispanics in Philosophy and sat as president of the Society for Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy, Society for Iberian and Latin American Thought, American Catholic Philosophical Association and the Metaphysical Society of America.
Gracia worked for the State University of New York at Buffalo from 1971 until he retired in January 2020 as SUNY Distinguished Professor and Samuel P. Capen Chair in the departments of philosophy and comparative literature.
Héctor-Neri Castañeda
Castañeda was a Guatemalan American philosopher who emigrated to the U.S. in 1948 as a refugee. He attended the University of Minnesota to earn his bachelor’s, master’s and PhD degrees.
After graduating with his PhD, Castañeda studied at Oxford University for a year before returning to the U.S. to work at Duke University for a short period of time. He went on to work at Wayne State University, where he founded the philosophical journal Noûs , which is still in production to this day.
Eventually, he moved to Indiana University in 1969 and became the Mahlon Powell Professor of philosophy as well as that university’s first dean of Latino affairs.
Castañeda is most notable for developing the guise theory , which applies to the analysis of thought, language and the structure of the world through abstract objects. He is also credited with the discovery of the concept of the quasi-indexical or quasi-indicator. This is a linguistic expression in which a person referencing another can shift from context to context, much like in the way ‘you’ can refer to a specific person in one context and another person in a different context.
In addition to his research, he was awarded a fellowship from the Guggenheim Foundation and received grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the National Science Foundation. He was also given the Presidential Medal of Honor by the government of Guatemala in 1991, among many other accomplishments.
Activities – Personal Philosophy of Education
In order to start building your own personal philosophy of education, it’s important to be able to articulate how you will incorporate diverse perspectives and ways of knowing into your teaching.
Instructions:
- Select a mainstream-culture based single story about education and analyze it. Examine how an ideology or stereotype is perpetuated through it
- Explore some or all of the story’s origins functions impact on education
- Then examine the alternative stories: those told by the survivors of the single story
- Propose ways to change the story both in your teaching and in the educational system in general
Like learning, teaching is always developing; it is never realized once and for all. Our public schools have always served as sites of moral, economic, political, religious and social conflict and assimilation into a narrowly defined standard image of what it means to be an American. According to Britzman (as quoted by Kelle, 1996), “the context of teaching is political, it is an ideological context that privileges the interests, values, and practices necessary to maintain the status quo.” Teaching is by no means “innocent of ideology,” she declares. Rather, the context of education tends to preserve “the institutional values of compliance to authority, social conformity, efficiency, standardization, competition, and the objectification of knowledge” (p. 66-67).
It should be no surprise then that contemporary debates over public education continue to reflect our deepest ideological differences. As Tyack and Cuban (1995) have noted in their historical study of school reform, the nation’s perception toward schooling often “shift[s]… from panacea to scapegoat” (p. 14). We would go a long way in solving academic achievement and closing educational gaps by addressing the broader structural issues that institutionalize and perpetuate poverty and inequality.
AFT – American Federation of Teachers – A Union of Professionals. (n.d.). American Federation of Teachers. https://www.aft.org/
April 14, 1947: Mendez v. Westminster Court Ruling – Zinn Education Project. (2023, May 25). Zinn Education Project. https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/mendez-v-westminster/
ASU Local-Los Angeles welcomes its 3rd cohort of students. (2021, September 24). ASU News. https://news.asu.edu/20210924-latin-american-philosophers-you-should-know-about
BBC News. (2021, June 24). Canada: 751 unmarked graves found at residential school. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57592243
Bennett, Jr., Lerone (2005). “Carter G. Woodson, Father of Black History”. United States Department of State. Archived from the original on April 1, 2011. Retrieved May 30, 2011.
“Carter G. Woodson: Winona, WV – New River Gorge National Park and Preserve (U.S. National Park Service)”. www.nps.gov. Retrieved April 17, 2021.
Daryl Michael Scott, “The History of Black History Month” Archived July 23, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, on ASALH website.
Del Maestro Cmf, W. (2023). Maestros de América Latina, una serie que todo educador y estudiante de educación tiene que ver. Web Del Maestro CMF. https://webdelmaestrocmf.com/portal/maestros-de-america-latina-una-serie-que-todo-educador-y-estudiante-de-educacion-tiene-que-ver/
Du Bois, William Edward Burghardt (1997). The correspondence of W. E. B. Du Bois, Volume 3. University of Massachusetts Press. p. 282. ISBN 1-55849-105-8. Retrieved May 30, 2011.
Du Bois, W. E. B. The Souls of Black Folk. New York, Avenel, NJ: Gramercy Books; 1994
Evans, N. E. C. (2021, July 11). A Federal Probe Into Indian Boarding School Gravesites Seeks To Bring Healing. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2021/07/11/1013772743/indian-boarding-school-gravesites-federal-investigation
Hine, Darlene Clark (1986). “Carter G. Woodson, White Philanthropy and Negro Historiography”. The History Teacher. JSTOR. 19 (3): 407. doi : 10.2307/493381 . ISSN 0018-2745 . JSTOR 493381 .
Hooks, Bell (1994). Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415908078 . OCLC 30668295 .
Jan. 5, 1931: Lemon Grove incident – Zinn Education Project. (2023, January 6). Zinn Education Project. https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/lemon-grove-incident/
Kahn, Jonathon S., Divine Discontent: The Religious Imagination of W. E. B. Du Bois, Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-530789-4.
Lewis, David Levering (1993). W. E. B. Du Bois: Biography of a Race 1868–1919. New York City: Henry Holt and Co. p. 11. ISBN 9781466841512.
Liberatory thinking . (n.d.). https://www.cps.edu/sites/equity/equity-framework/equity-lens/liberatory-thinking/
Love, B. (2019). We Want To Do More Than Survive: Abolitionist Teaching and the Pursuit of Educational Freedom. Beacon.
National Education Association | NEA. (n.d.). https://www.nea.org/
Paulo Freire | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). https://iep.utm.edu/freire/
PBS Online: Only A Teacher: Schoolhouse Pioneers. (n.d.). https://www.pbs.org/onlyateacher/john.html
Perez, D. (2022b, January 3). Social foundations of K-12 education. Pressbooks. https://kstatelibraries.pressbooks.pub/dellaperezproject/
Perez, D. (2022a, January 3). Chapter 4: Foundational Philosophies of Education. Pressbooks. https://kstatelibraries.pressbooks.pub/dellaperezproject/chapter/chapter-3-foundational-philosophies-of-education/
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (A. R. Luria, M. Lopez-Morillas & M. Cole [with J. V. Wertsch], Trans.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Original work [ca. 1930-1934)
Wamba, Philippe (1999). Kinship. New York, New York: Penguin Group. p. 82. ISBN 978-0-525-94387-7.
3.1 – “Two silhouette profile or a white vase.” by Wikimedia Commons is in the Public Domain, CC0
3.2 – “W.E.B. Du Bois” by James E. Purdy, Wikimedia Commons is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
3.3 – “Carter Godwin Woodson” by Flickr is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.4 – “bell hooks” by Wikimedia Commons is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
3.5 – “Henry Giroux” by Flickr is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.6 – “Paulo Freire” by Wikimedia Commons is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
3.7 – “Gabriela Mistral sonriendo” by Wikimedia Commons is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
3.8 – “Sarmiento” by Get Archive is in the Public Domain, CC0
3.9 – “Simón Rodriguez” by Wikipedia is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.10 – “Jose Vasconsuelos” by Wikipedia is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.11 – “Jose Carlos Mariategui” by Wikipedia is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.12 – “Jose Marti” by Wikipedia is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.1 – Essentialism in Education (Essentialist Philosophy of Education, Essentialist Theory of Education)s” by PHILO-notes, YouTube is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.2 -“Perennialism: Overview & Practical Teaching Examples” by Shayla Czuchran, YouTube is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.3 – “Progressivism: Overview & Practical Teaching Examples” by Teea Shook, YouTube is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.4 – “Social Reconstruction” by Sarah Barlowe, YouTube is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.5 – “Paulo Freire’s Critical Pedagogy” by Dr. Yu-Ling Lee, YouTube is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.6 – “The Earth Talks: Indigenous Ways of Knowing – with Pat McCabe” by Dartington Trust, YouTube is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.7 – “Presentación de la serie Maestros de América Latina” by UNIPE Universidad Pedagógica Nacional , YouTube is licensed under CC BY 4.0
3.8 – “The danger of a single story “ by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie , YouTube is licensed under CC BY 4.0
Foundations of Education Copyright © 2023 by Lisa AbuAssaly George; Dr. Kanoe Bunney; Ceci De Valdenebro; and Tanya Mead is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Share This Book
Teaching Philosophies in Education
A teaching philosophy is a teacher’s set of beliefs about their role and the goals of education. It’s like a teacher’s personal rule book for how to do their job. It influences how they teach, make important choices, and work with everyone at the school. A teaching philosophy isn’t just a fancy thought—it helps teachers do their best in the classroom.
If we take a step back, think of the term teaching philosophy like this: Imagine you’re on a big journey. Before you start, you need to know why you’re going, what you want to discover, and how you’ll go about it. That’s what a teaching philosophy does for teachers. It’s like their compass and roadmap, explaining why they’re teaching, what they hope their students will learn, and how they’re going to teach it.
How to Guide: Teachers create their teaching philosophy by thinking about their own school days, what they want students to achieve, the responsibilities they have, and by looking at what other smart people have said about education. They might write all this down in a statement that acts like a reminder to keep their teaching on track with their beliefs and goals.
There are several different types of teaching philosophies that teachers might follow:
- Progressivism : Teachers who follow this philosophy believe education should help grow every part of a student, not just their brain. They use hands-on activities and make lessons feel connected to the real world.
- Essentialism: Here, the teacher is like the boss of the classroom and focuses on teaching students a must-know set of knowledge , often sticking to traditional subjects.
- Perennialism: It’s a bit like essentialism, but it puts more weight on big ideas and thinking skills rather than just knowing facts. These teachers want students to think deeply about important, timeless questions.
- Reconstructionism: Teachers with this philosophy use the classroom to help make the world better. They push students to think critically and question how society works, aiming to improve it.
- Existentialism : This philosophy is all about the student. What they need, want, and are interested in comes first, instead of just following a fixed academic program.
Examples of Teaching Philosophies In Education
Now let’s look at some examples and why they fit their philosophy:
- A progressivist teacher might have students design a garden that also helps the local wildlife. This shows progressivism because it’s hands-on and connects learning to real-life issues.
- An essentialist teacher might spend several lessons on classic literature to make sure students understand these important texts. This is essentialism because they’re focusing on core knowledge.
- A perennialist teacher might host debates on whether heroes from old stories acted rightly. This is perennialism because students have to use their thinking skills on timeless questions.
- A reconstructivist teacher might help students set up a program to tackle bullying in their school. This shows reconstructionism because it’s about making a positive change in society.
- An existentialist teacher might let students enjoy a “free reading” period where they can pick any book they like. This is existentialism since it honors students’ personal choices.
Why Is It Important?
A clear teaching philosophy is the backbone that supports many things a teacher does:
It makes sure teachers keep to their personal teaching style and create a place where learning is fun and effective. It guides choices around how to teach, check students’ understanding, and how to talk and listen to students. It lets teachers explain their teaching ways to parents, bosses, and other teachers.
Also, when a teacher knows their teaching philosophy well, it can guide them in growing as a teacher by pointing out which skills they want to get better at. Plus, it adds to their sense of who they are as a teacher and what makes their job rewarding.
Imagine if you’re trying to get better at a sport or a hobby. Knowing why you love it and what your goals are makes it easier to improve and keeps it enjoyable. That’s what a teaching philosophy does for teachers.
The idea of teaching philosophies has been shaped over time by some very thoughtful people and changes in how we teach. For example, John Locke thought education could shape a person, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau said we should focus on how kids naturally grow and learn. Their thinking is a big part of today’s teaching philosophies.
More modern people like John Dewey added new ideas too. Dewey said that learning should matter to students’ everyday lives and that schools should be about more than just book-learning.
Controversies
There are disagreements when it comes to teaching philosophies. Some people argue over whether a traditional style of teaching is better or if we should try newer, more open ways. They can’t agree on how much power teachers should have, what knowledge is essential, and if a student’s interests should be part of learning.
Another debate is whether teachers should talk about societal issues in class. Some believe that schools should just focus on academics, while others think preparing students to tackle big world problems is also a teacher’s job.
Lastly, people don’t see eye-to-eye on the best way to check if teaching is effective and students are learning. There’s a lot of debate about standardized tests and whether they are a fair way to measure education.
Related Topics
Teaching philosophies connect to some other big ideas in education like:
- Differentiated Instruction: This is about teachers changing how they teach so that each student can learn in the way that’s best for them. It’s related to teaching philosophies because how a teacher views learning will shape how they use differentiated instruction.
- Classroom Management: This involves how teachers keep their classroom running smoothly. Their teaching philosophy can affect how strict they are or how they deal with challenges in class.
- Educational Psychology: This is the study of how people learn. A teacher’s philosophy will be influenced by what they believe about learning and thinking, which is part of educational psychology.
To wrap it up, a teaching philosophy is a big deal in education. It’s about a teacher’s beliefs on why they teach, the best way to help students learn, and what they think is most important in their job. Knowing one’s teaching philosophy helps teach with purpose and benefits students in their learning journey.
While every teacher’s philosophy is a personal thing, learning about the different types can help new teachers start off well or experienced teachers try new things. As the world changes, so do teaching philosophies, and with that, the way we think about teaching and learning evolves too.
4 Teaching Philosophy Statement Examples
ThoughtCo / J.R. Bee
- Becoming A Teacher
- Assessments & Tests
- Elementary Education
- Secondary Education
- Special Education
- Homeschooling
- M.S., Education, Buffalo State College
- B.S., Education, Buffalo State College
A teaching philosophy statement, or an educational philosophy statement, is a brief essay that nearly all prospective teachers must write when applying for an academic position. The statement generally reflects on the writer's teaching beliefs and includes concrete examples of how those beliefs have informed the writer's teaching practices.
A well-crafted teaching statement gives a clear and unique portrait of the writer as a teacher. Teaching philosophy statements are important because a clear teaching philosophy can lead to a change in teaching behavior and foster professional and personal growth. As a result, it can also be effective for practicing teachers to conceptualize their teaching approaches by writing a statement—even if they aren't applying for another teaching role.
Examples of Teaching Philosophy Statements
This passage is an example of a strong statement of teaching philosophy because it puts students at the front and center of the teacher's focus. An author who writes such a statement will likely always ensure student needs are the primary focus of all lessons and schoolwork.
"My philosophy of education is that all children are unique and must have a stimulating educational environment where they can grow physically, mentally, emotionally, and socially. It is my desire to create this type of atmosphere where students can meet their full potential. I will provide a safe environment where students are invited to share their ideas and take risks.
"I believe that there are five essential elements that are conducive to learning. (1) The teacher's role is to act as a guide. (2) Students must have access to hands-on activities. (3) Students should be able to have choices and let their curiosity direct their learning. (4) Students need the opportunity to practice skills in a safe environment. (5) Technology must be incorporated into the school day."
The following statement is a good example of a teaching philosophy because the author emphasizes that all classrooms and students are unique, with specific learning needs and styles. A teacher with this philosophy is likely to ensure they spend time helping each student achieve their highest potential.
"I believe that all children are unique and have something special that they can bring to their own education. I will assist my students to express themselves and accept themselves for who they are, as well embrace the differences of others.
"Every classroom has its own unique community; my role as the teacher will be to assist each child in developing their own potential and learning styles. I will present a curriculum that will incorporate each different learning style, as well as make the content relevant to the students' lives. I will incorporate hands-on learning, cooperative learning, projects, themes, and individual work to engage and activate students learning."
This statement provides a solid example because the author emphasizes the moral objective of teaching: She will hold each student to the highest expectations and ensure each one is diligent in their studies. This statement also implies the teacher will not give up on any student.
"I believe that a teacher is morally obligated to enter the classroom with only the highest of expectations for each and every one of her students. Thus, the teacher maximizes the positive benefits that naturally come along with any self-fulfilling prophecy. With dedication, perseverance, and hard work, her students will rise to the occasion."
"I aim to bring an open mind, a positive attitude, and high expectations to the classroom each day. I believe that I owe it to my students, as well as the community, to bring consistency, diligence, and warmth to my job in the hope that I can ultimately inspire and encourage such traits in the children as well."
The following statement takes a slightly different approach. It states that classrooms should be warm and caring communities, and unlike the first two sample statements, it focuses more on community-based learning, as opposed to an individualized approach. The teaching strategies mentioned, such as morning meetings and community problem-solving, follow this community-based philosophy.
"I believe that a classroom should be a safe, caring community where children are free to speak their mind, blossom, and grow. I will use strategies to ensure our classroom community will flourish, like the morning meeting, positive vs. negative discipline, classroom jobs, and problem-solving skills.
"Teaching is a process of learning from your students, colleagues, parents, and the community. This is a lifelong process where you learn new strategies, new ideas, and new philosophies. Over time, my educational philosophy may change, and that's okay. That just means that I have grown and learned new things."
Components of a Teaching Philosophy Statement
A teaching philosophy statement should include an introduction, body, and conclusion—just as you would expect of your students if they were writing a paper. But there are other specific components that you need to include:
Introduction: This should be your thesis statement where you discuss your general belief about education (such as: "I believe all students have a right to learn"), as well as your teaching ideals. Consider what students will have learned once they depart your class, and what those lessons learned say about your teaching philosophy and strategies.
Body: In this part of the statement, discuss what you see as the ideal classroom environment and how it makes you a better teacher, addresses student needs, and facilitates interactions between parents and their children. Discuss how you would facilitate age-appropriate learning and involve students in the assessment process . Explain how you would put your educational ideals into practice.
Clearly state your goals and objectives for students. Layout specifically what you hope your teaching will help students to accomplish. Be specific by telling a story or detailing a teaching strategy you've used. Doing so helps your reader understand how your teaching philosophy would play out in the classroom.
Conclusion : In this section, talk about your goals as a teacher, how you have been able to meet them in the past, and how you can build on them to meet future challenges. Focus on your personal approach to pedagogy and classroom management, as well as what makes you unique as an educator, and how you wish to advance your career.
Cite your sources. Explain where your teaching philosophy originated—for example, from your experiences as an undergraduate, from a faculty mentor you worked with during your teacher-training program, or perhaps from books or articles on teaching that had a particular influence on you.
Formatting Your Statement
There are some general rules to follow when writing a teaching philosophy statement.
Keep it brief. The statement should be no more than one-to-two pages, double-spaced.
Use present tense , and write the statement in the first person, as the previous examples illustrate.
Avoid jargon. Use common, everyday language, and not technical terms. If you must use jargon, explain what you're writing about in everyday terms as well.
Be personal. Make sure you talk about your experiences and beliefs, and ensure your statement is original and truly describes the methods and philosophy you would employ in teaching.
Vanderbilt University. " Teaching Statements ."
The Chronicle of Higher Education. " 4 Steps to a Memorable Teaching Philosophy ."
The Ohio State University. " Philosophy of Teaching Statement ."
- How to Write a Philosophy of Education for Elementary Teachers
- Student Teacher Evaluation Criteria
- Top Tips for Acing a Teacher Interview
- Common Interview Questions in Education
- A Short Guide to Microteaching
- What Is Student Teaching Really Like?
- Learning the Basics of a Student Teacher Resume
- Landing Your First Teaching Job
- Weighing the Decision: To Teach or Not to Teach
- 9 Things to Know About Becoming a Teacher
- What Is the Role of a Teacher?
- What Requirements Are Needed to Be an Elementary School Teacher?
- 8 Signs You Should Become a Teacher
- 24 Simple Rules All Teachers Should Live By
- 7 Reasons to Become a Teacher
- 10 Useful Skills Modern Teachers Need
Other ways to search:
- Events Calendar
- Graduate Students
- International Students
- Staff & Faculty
How to write your philosophy of education statement
![what is a personal philosophy of education person writing in a notebook](https://www.colorado.edu/career/sites/default/files/styles/large_image_style/public/article-image/cathryn-lavery-67852-unsplash.jpg?itok=WOJlPHco)
The Philosophy of Education Statement is an important piece in your educator portfolio. It may be requested by hiring personnel at schools to be included with a cover letter and resume. Your teaching philosophy should be thoughtful, organized and well-written. The summary should be between 1-2 pages and should document and support your core educational principles.
- First, state your objectives as a teacher. These need to be achievable through some form of assessment.
- Second, you will want to outline the methods by which you will achieve your teaching objectives.
- Third, you will need to have demonstrated evidence of your achievements. This may take the form of standardized assessments or evaluations.
- Forth, allude to the factors that motivate you to be in the teaching profession. This is where you can be cerebral. State what motivates you to be in the teaching profession.
Some Important Considerations
Your core values and beliefs.
The statement should reflect your core values and beliefs in terms of teaching. Consider your thoughts regarding the nature of students, the purpose of education and how people learn, and the role of teacher. As you develop your educational philosophy, think about completing the following statements:
- I believe the purposes of education are ...
- I believe that students learn best when...
- I believe that the following curriculum basics will contribute to the social, emotional, intellectual and physical development of my students ...
- I believe that a good learning environment is one in which ...
- I believe that all students have the following basic needs ...
- In order to further the growth and learning of my students, these basic needs will be met in my classroom through ...
- I believe that teachers should have the following qualities ...
Why You Teach
- What is the purpose of education?
- What is your role as an educator?
Whom You Teach
- How will you reach the diverse students in your classroom?
- How do you define your community of learners?
How and What You Teach
- What are your beliefs about how students learn?
- How will your beliefs affect your teaching? Think about management, instructional strategies, curriculum design and assessment.
- How do you balance the needs of the individual learner with the needs of the classroom community?
- What are your goals for students?
Where You Teach
- How will you bring a global awareness to your classroom?
- What will be your relationship with the community, parents, teaching colleagues and administration?
Completing the Application
Don't cut corners! As you are completing your applications, keep in mind that they are as important to your job search as your resume, letter of interest and other documents in your application packet. You are encouraged not to rush through completing your applications. Regional applications may be required instead of or in addition to the employer’s individual application.
- Be consistent with the information you provide on the application and on your resume. Make sure there are no contradictions of dates and places of employment and education.
- Do not make up an answer. Be honest. If you embellish, it will eventually catch up with you and you will leave a negative impression on the employer.
- Extra-curricular activities, which you may be willing to sponsor or coach, may be listed on most applications. Your willingness to sponsor activities can sometimes enhance your consideration for positions.
- Follow the application directions exactly. The directions may be different for each application you complete, so read all the directions carefully. Enter the correct information in the correct fields.
- Grammatical rules should be followed at all times. Teachers are held to high standards. Errors are unacceptable.
- Humor in your responses on an application can come across as sarcastic or flippant.
- Remember, an application may be a prospective employer’s first introduction to you; make it a professional one.
- Incomplete applications give the appearance of poor attention to detail. It is always best to respond to each question posed on an application whenever possible. An employer would not ask it if s/he did not want an answer.
- Never answer a question with “See my resume.”
- Our Mission
What Is Your Educational Philosophy?
While lesson planning this summer, educators might also take time to reflect on their core beliefs about learning and teaching.
![what is a personal philosophy of education Girl sitting at a table next to stairs working on her laptop](https://wpvip.edutopia.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/johnson-whatisyouredphilosophy.jpg?w=200&quality=85)
Over the summer, teachers reflect on the year and often redesign and perfect their teaching strategies and plans. In essence, they get back to the basics of what they believe is the best way to inspire learning in their students -- in other words, they revisit and refine their philosophy of education.
A school district might ask a teacher or principal applying for a job about her or his philosophy of education. In this post, I've decide to share mine, and I am curious to see if any of my beliefs resonate with you. So here they are:
1. Students need to learn.
Students want and need to learn as much as they need food, clothing, and shelter. An educator's primary job is to fill that primal need for learning by creating engaging and relevant learning experiences every day. The greatest gift a teacher can give students is motivating them to experience repeated learning success.
2. Students need to be active participants in learning.
Students learn best by doing, and active teaching encourages active learning. Teachers should treat students as active participants in the learning process, providing them with skills, such as:
- How to study
- How to take notes
- How to memorize
- How to express themselves effectively
These skills will help them be part of a high-performance learning team. Also, students need to be encouraged to explore and research information beyond the confines of the classroom and textbook.
3. Learning is a physiological activity involving the whole body.
The best way to engage a student is to have a solid classroom management plan and a well-planned lesson that is grounded in relevant, purposeful activities designed to enhance that student's knowledge and skills and leave her or him wanting to learn more. Teachers should be strongly aligned with student-centered and student-directed learning that embraces exploration, discovery, experiential learning, and the production of academically rigorous products.
4. Students need timely feedback to improve.
Teachers gather data on student performance to adjust the learning environment and instruction so that they can target students' learning needs. Teachers administer pretests to find a starting point for learning and post-tests to determine the students' increase in performance level as well as the teachers' effectiveness.
5. Students need structure and repetition to learn.
A teacher should be able to organize a standards-based lesson sequence, successfully implement the plan, and then evaluate student learning. A teacher should be able to create an exciting learning environment that makes it difficult for students to not learn. A teacher should know how to include all students in learning at their own level, and a teacher should be able to inspire the students to push themselves to the next level.
6. Students need information, knowledge, and skills.
Having access to knowledge resources is as important to a child's education as the actual curriculum content. Relevant and current information must be at the teachers' and students' fingertips to provide answers when the questions are still fresh. Information "on demand" is more valuable than information "just in case."
7. Students need tools and resources.
Students should know how their taxon and locale memory systems work. Students should have skills and strategies to be able to work effectively in the different levels of the cognitive domain as defined by Benjamin Bloom. Students should be aware of their own learning preferences, and teachers should assist with creating a plan to develop other learning skills. Educational tools are a means to an end. For example, technology used appropriately can greatly magnify the students' capacity to learn and the teachers' capacity to teach, inspire, and motivate.
Please share your philosophy in the comment section below. Also, if you wish to analyze mine and give me feedback, I would appreciate that, too.
- Skip To Main Content
- Report an Accessibility Barrier
- Accessibility
Writing a Teaching Philosophy
![what is a personal philosophy of education Brenda Wells teaching a group of students](https://ofe.ecu.edu/wp-content/pv-uploads/sites/277/2022/04/Wells_COB-6-scaled_1920x750_acf_cropped-1024x400.jpeg)
A teaching philosophy is a reflection of your beliefs, values, and goals regarding teaching. It should also provide concrete examples of how you achieve these goals or endorse your beliefs in the classroom. In essence, its contents should represent who you are as a person and teacher.
Tips for Writing Your Teaching Philosophy Statement
![what is a personal philosophy of education Writing Your Teaching Philosophy Statement PowerPoint](https://ofe.ecu.edu/teachingresources/wp-content/pv-uploads/sites/302/2020/08/slide_0085_full-300x169.jpg)
Your teaching statement should:
- explain what you want to accomplish and how your teaching is intended to bring that about, addressing both short and long-term goals for your teaching
- illustrate how you design your course content to meet University, departmental, and personal goals while facilitating student learning
- establish a connection between teaching and learning and your classroom practices
- suggest criteria for evaluating your work as a teacher
- demonstrate your engagement with central issues of teaching
- show your commitment to the improvement of your teaching
Questions to ask yourself when writing your statement of teaching philosophy:
- Where do you find your inspiration and/or motivation for teaching?
- What is your view of the teacher’s role in the classroom and with students?
- How do your teaching methods reflect your view?
- Has someone specific influenced your teaching style or approach to teaching – a mentor or past teacher? Why and how?
- How do you feel learning occurs?
- How do you build an intentional classroom culture?
- How do your personal characteristics and teaching style impact your students’ learning?
- How do you help students learn and develop as individuals?
- How do you provide different types of learning opportunities for different types of learners?
- What obstacles do you think students face and how do you help them overcome difficulties?
- How have you modified your methods in response to changes in students, course materials, your situation, changes in curriculum, or other mitigating factors?
- What do you feel you need to change in how you teach? What difference will this make? Express this plan for growth in terms of desired outcomes/underlying values.
General Criteria & Format of Teaching Philosophies
There is no required format for a teaching philosophy. Many different styles and approaches are considered acceptable. However, there are some general guidelines related to the content and formatting of your teaching statement.
- Statements of teaching philosophy are generally 1 to 2 pages in length, and rarely longer than 3 pages double spaced.
- Avoid using technical terms when writing your philosophy – while these terms may be understood by individuals within your own field, many times your teaching philosophy is reviewed by individuals from a variety of disciplines and backgrounds if you are being considered for a teaching award.
- Write your teaching philosophy in the present tense.
- Most teaching philosophies are written in a narrative format.
- Provide a few specific examples related to the approaches you use in your teaching.
- Remember to revise this regularly! Your teaching philosophy will – and should – evolve over time.
Tools and Resources
- Explore your Teaching Style – Teaching Perspectives Inventory – http://www.teachingperspectives.com/tpi/
- Examples from ECU Faculty
- External Resources for Writing a Teaching Philosophy
![what is a personal philosophy of education SEP thinker apres Rodin](https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/symbols/sepman.png)
Philosophy of Education
All human societies, past and present, have had a vested interest in education; and some wits have claimed that teaching (at its best an educational activity) is the second oldest profession. While not all societies channel sufficient resources into support for educational activities and institutions, all at the very least acknowledge their centrality—and for good reasons. For one thing, it is obvious that children are born illiterate and innumerate, and ignorant of the norms and cultural achievements of the community or society into which they have been thrust; but with the help of professional teachers and the dedicated amateurs in their families and immediate environs (and with the aid, too, of educational resources made available through the media and nowadays the internet), within a few years they can read, write, calculate, and act (at least often) in culturally-appropriate ways. Some learn these skills with more facility than others, and so education also serves as a social-sorting mechanism and undoubtedly has enormous impact on the economic fate of the individual. Put more abstractly, at its best education equips individuals with the skills and substantive knowledge that allows them to define and to pursue their own goals, and also allows them to participate in the life of their community as full-fledged, autonomous citizens.
But this is to cast matters in very individualistic terms, and it is fruitful also to take a societal perspective, where the picture changes somewhat. It emerges that in pluralistic societies such as the Western democracies there are some groups that do not wholeheartedly support the development of autonomous individuals, for such folk can weaken a group from within by thinking for themselves and challenging communal norms and beliefs; from the point of view of groups whose survival is thus threatened, formal, state-provided education is not necessarily a good thing. But in other ways even these groups depend for their continuing survival on educational processes, as do the larger societies and nation-states of which they are part; for as John Dewey put it in the opening chapter of his classic work Democracy and Education (1916), in its broadest sense education is the means of the “social continuity of life” (Dewey, 1916, 3). Dewey pointed out that the “primary ineluctable facts of the birth and death of each one of the constituent members in a social group” make education a necessity, for despite this biological inevitability “the life of the group goes on” (Dewey, 3). The great social importance of education is underscored, too, by the fact that when a society is shaken by a crisis, this often is taken as a sign of educational breakdown; education, and educators, become scapegoats.
It is not surprising that such an important social domain has attracted the attention of philosophers for thousands of years, especially as there are complex issues aplenty that have great philosophical interest. Even a cursory reading of these opening paragraphs reveals that they touch on, in nascent form, some but by no means all of the issues that have spawned vigorous debate down the ages; restated more explicitly in terms familiar to philosophers of education, the issues the discussion above flitted over were: education as transmission of knowledge versus education as the fostering of inquiry and reasoning skills that are conducive to the development of autonomy (which, roughly, is the tension between education as conservative and education as progressive, and also is closely related to differing views about human “perfectibility”—issues that historically have been raised in the debate over the aims of education); the question of what this knowledge, and what these skills, ought to be—part of the domain of philosophy of the curriculum; the questions of how learning is possible, and what is it to have learned something—two sets of issues that relate to the question of the capacities and potentialities that are present at birth, and also to the process (and stages) of human development and to what degree this process is flexible and hence can be influenced or manipulated; the tension between liberal education and vocational education, and the overlapping issue of which should be given priority—education for personal development or education for citizenship (and the issue of whether or not this is a false dichotomy); the differences (if any) between education and enculturation; the distinction between educating versus teaching versus training versus indoctrination; the relation between education and maintenance of the class structure of society, and the issue of whether different classes or cultural groups can—justly—be given educational programs that differ in content or in aims; the issue of whether the rights of children, parents, and socio-cultural or ethnic groups, conflict—and if they do, the question of whose rights should be dominant; the question as to whether or not all children have a right to state-provided education, and if so, should this education respect the beliefs and customs of all groups and how on earth would this be accomplished; and a set of complex issues about the relation between education and social reform, centering upon whether education is essentially conservative, or whether it can be an (or, the ) agent of social change.
It is impressive that most of the philosophically-interesting issues touched upon above, plus additional ones not alluded to here, were addressed in one of the early masterpieces of the Western intellectual tradition—Plato's Republic . A.N. Whitehead somewhere remarked that the history of Western philosophy is nothing but a series of footnotes to Plato, and if the Meno and the Laws are added to the Republic , the same is true of the history of educational thought and of philosophy of education in particular. At various points throughout this essay the discussion shall return to Plato, and at the end there shall be a brief discussion of the two other great figures in the field—Rousseau and Dewey. But the account of the field needs to start with some features of it that are apt to cause puzzlement, or that make describing its topography difficult. These include, but are not limited to, the interactions between philosophy of education and its parent discipline.
1.1 The open nature of philosophy and philosophy of education
1.2 the different bodies of work traditionally included in the field, 1.3 paradigm wars the diversity of, and clashes between, philosophical approaches, 2.1 the early work: c.d. hardie, 2.2 the dominant years: language, and clarification of key concepts, 2.3 countervailing forces, 2.4 a new guise contemporary social, political and moral philosophy, 3.1 philosophical disputes concerning empirical education research, 3.2 the content of the curriculum, and the aims and functions of schooling, 3.3 rousseau, dewey, and the progressive movement, 4. concluding remarks, bibliography, other internet resources, related entries, 1. problems in delineating the field.
There is a large—and ever expanding—number of works designed to give guidance to the novice setting out to explore the domain of philosophy of education; most if not all of the academic publishing houses have at least one representative of this genre on their list, and the titles are mostly variants of the following archetypes: The History and Philosophy of Education , The Philosophical Foundations of Education , Philosophers on Education , Three Thousand Years of Educational Wisdom , A Guide to the Philosophy of Education , and Readings in Philosophy of Education . The overall picture that emerges from even a sampling of this collective is not pretty; the field lacks intellectual cohesion, and (from the perspective taken in this essay) there is a widespread problem concerning the rigor of the work and the depth of scholarship—although undoubtedly there are islands, but not continents, of competent philosophical discussion of difficult and socially-important issues of the kind listed earlier. On the positive side—the obverse of the lack of cohesion—there is, in the field as a whole, a degree of adventurousness in the form of openness to ideas and radical approaches, a trait that is sometimes lacking in other academic fields. This is not to claim, of course, that taken individually philosophers of education are more open-minded than their philosophical cousins!
Part of the explanation for this diffuse state-of-affairs is that, quite reasonably, most philosophers of education have the goal (reinforced by their institutional affiliation with Schools of Education and their involvement in the initial training of teachers) of contributing not to philosophy but to educational policy and practice. This shapes not only their selection of topics, but also the manner in which the discussion is pursued; and this orientation also explains why philosophers of education—to a far greater degree, it is to be suspected, than their “pure” cousins—publish not in philosophy journals but in a wide range of professionally-oriented journals (such as Educational Researcher , Harvard Educational Review , Teachers College Record , Cambridge Journal of Education, Journal of Curriculum Studies , and the like). Some individuals work directly on issues of classroom practice, others identify as much with fields such as educational policy analysis, curriculum theory, teacher education, or some particular subject-matter domain such as math or science education, as they do with philosophy of education. It is still fashionable in some quarters to decry having one's intellectual agenda shaped so strongly as this by concerns emanating from a field of practice; but as Stokes (1997) has made clear, many of the great, theoretically-fruitful research programs in natural science had their beginnings in such practical concerns—as Pasteur's grounbreaking work illustrates. It is dangerous to take the theory versus practice dichotomy too seriously.
However, there is another consequence of this institutional housing of the vast majority of philosphers of education that is worth noting—one that is not found in a comparable way in philosophers of science, for example, who almost always are located in departments of philosophy—namely, that experience as a teacher, or in some other education-related role, is a qualification to become a philosopher of education that in many cases is valued at least as much as depth of philosophical training. (The issue is not that educational experience is irrelevant—clearly it can be highly pertinent—but it is that in the tradeoff with philosophical training, philosophy often loses.) But there are still other factors at work that contribute to the field's diffuseness, that all relate in some way to the nature of the discipline of philosophy itself.
In describing the field of philosophy, and in particular the sub-field that has come to be identified as philosophy of education, one quickly runs into a difficulty not found to anything like the same degree in other disciplines. For example, although there are some internal differences in opinion, nevertheless there seems to be quite a high degree of consensus within the domain of quantum physics about which researchers are competent members of the field and which ones are not, and what work is a strong contribution (or potential contribution). The very nature of philosophy, on the other hand, is “essentially contested”; what counts as a sound philosophical work within one school of thought, or socio-cultural or academic setting, may not be so-regarded (and may even be the focus of derision) in a different one. Coupled with this is the fact that the borders of the field are not policed, so that the philosophically-untrained can cross into it freely—indeed, over the past century or more a great many individuals from across the spectrum of real and pseudo disciplines have for whatever reason exercised their right to self-identify as members of this broad and loosely defined category of “philosophers” (as a few minutes spent browsing in the relevant section of a bookstore will verify).
In essence, then, there are two senses of the term “philosopher” and its cognates: a loose but common sense in which any individual who cogitates in any manner about such issues as the meaning of life, the nature of social justice, the essence of sportsmanship, the aims of education, the foundations of the school curriculum, or relationship with the Divine, is thereby a philosopher; and there is a more technical sense referring to those who have been formally trained or have acquired competence in one or more areas such as epistemology, metaphysics, moral philosophy, logic, philosophy of science, and the like. If this bifurcation presents a problem for adequately delineating the field of philosophy, the difficulties grow tenfold or more with respect to philosophy of education.
This essay offers a description and assessment of the field as seen by a scholar rooted firmly in the formal branch of “philosophy of education”, and moreover this branch as it has developed in the English-speaking world (some of which, of course, has been inspired by Continental philosophy); but first it is necessary to say a little more about the difficulties that confront the individual who sets out, without presuppositions, to understand the topography of “philosophy of education”.
It will not take long for a person who consults several of the introductory texts alluded to earlier to encounter a number of different bodies of work (loosely bounded to be sure) that have by one source or another been regarded as part of the domain of philosophy of education; the inclusion of some of these as part of the field is largely responsible for the diffuse topography described earlier. What follows is an informal and incomplete accounting.
First, there are works of advocacy produced by those non-technical, self-identified “philosophers” described above, who often have an axe to grind; they may wish to destroy (or to save) common schooling, support or attack some innovation or reform, shore-up or destroy the capitalist mode of production, see their own religion (or none at all) gain a foothold in the public schools, strengthen the place of “the basics” in the school curriculum, and so forth. While these topics certainly can be, and have been, discussed with due care, often they have been pursued in loose but impressive language where exhortation substitutes for argumentation—and hence sometimes they are mistaken for works of philosophy of education! In the following discussion this genre shall be passed over in silence.
Second, there is a corpus of work somewhat resembling the first, but where the arguments are tighter, and where the authors usually are individuals of some distinction whose insights are thought-provoking—possibly because they have a degree of familiarity with some branch of educational activity, having been teachers (or former teachers), school principals, religious leaders, politicians, journalists, and the like. While these works frequently touch on philosophical issues, they are not pursued to any philosophical depth and can hardly be considered as contributions to the scholarship of the discipline. However, some works in this genre are among the classics of “educational thought”—a more felicitous label than “philosophy of education”; cases in point would be the essays, pamphlets and letters of Thomas Arnold (headmaster of Rugby school), John Wesley (the founder of Methodism), J.H. (Cardinal) Newman, T.H. Huxley, and the writings on progressive schooling by A.S. Neill (of Summerhill school). Some textbooks even include extracts from the writings or recorded sayings of such figures as Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, and Jesus of Nazareth (for the latter three, in works spanning more than half a century, see Ulich, 1950, and Murphy, 2006). Books and extracts in this genre—which elsewhere I have called “cultured reflection on education”—are often used in teacher-training courses that march under the banner of “educational foundations”, “introduction to educational thought”, or “introduction to philosophy of education”.
Third, there are a number of educational theorists and researchers, whose field of activity is not philosophy but—for example—might be human development or learning theory, who in their technical work and sometimes in their non-technical books and reflective essays explicitly raise philosophical issues or adopt philosophical modes of argumentation—and do so in ways worthy of careful study. If philosophy (including philosophy of education) is defined so as to include analysis and reflection at an abstract or “meta-level”, which undoubtedly is a domain where many philosophers labor, then these individuals should have a place in the annals of philosophy or philosophy of education; but too often, although not always, accounts of the field ignore them. Their work might be subjected to scrutiny for being educationally important, but their conceptual or philosophical contributions are rarely focused upon. (Philosophers of the physical and biological sciences are far less prone to make this mistake about the meta-level work of reflective scientists in these domains.)
The educational theorists and researchers I have in mind as exemplars here are the behaviorist psychologist B.F. Skinner (who among other things wrote about the fate of the notions of human freedom and dignity in the light of the development of a “science of behavior”, and who developed a model of human action and also of learning that eschewed the influence of mental entities such as motives, interests, and ideas and placed the emphasis instead upon “schedules of reinforcement”); the foundational figure in modern developmental psychology with its near-fixation on stage theories, Jean Piaget (who developed in an abstract and detailed manner a “genetic epistemology” that was related to his developmental research); and the social psychologist Lev Vygotsky (who argued that the development of the human youngster was indelibly shaped by social forces, so much so that approaches which focused on the lone individual and that were biologically-oriented—he had Piaget in mind here—were quite inadequate).
Fourth, and in contrast to the group above, there is a type of work that is traditionally but undeservedly given a prominent place in the annals of philosophy of education, and which thereby generates a great deal of confusion and misunderstanding about the field. These are the books and reflective essays on educational topics that were written by mainstream philosophers, a number of whom are counted among the greatest in the history of the discipline. The catch is this: Even great philosophers do not always write philosophy! The reflections being referred-to contain little if any philosophical argumentation, and usually they were not intended to be contributions to the literature on any of the great philosophical questions. Rather, they expressed the author's views (or even prejudices) on educational rather than philosophical problems, and sometimes—as in the case of Bertrand Russell's rollicking pieces defending progressive educational practices—they explicitly were “potboilers” written to make money. (In Russell's case the royalties were used to support a progressive school he was running with his current wife.) Locke, Kant, and Hegel also are among those who produced work of this genre.
John Locke is an interesting case in point. He had been requested by a cousin and her husband—possibly in part because of his medical training—to give advice on the upbringing of their son and heir; the youngster seems to have troubled his parents, most likely because he had learning difficulties. Locke, then in exile in Europe, wrote the parents a series of letters in which alongside sensible advice about such matters as the priorities in the education of a landed gentleman, and about making learning fun for the boy, there were a few strange items such as the advice that the boy should wear leaky shoes in winter so that he would be toughened-up! The letters eventually were printed in book form under the title Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1693), and seem to have had enormous influence down the ages upon educational practice; after two centuries the book had run through some 35 English editions and well over thirty foreign editions, and it is still in print and is frequently excerpted in books of readings in philosophy of education. In stark contrast, several of Locke's major philosophical writings—the Essay Concerning Human Understanding , and the Letter on Toleration —have been overlooked by most educational theorists over the centuries, even though they have enormous relevance for educational philosophy, theory, policy, and practice. It is especially noteworthy that the former of these books was the foundation for an approach to psychology—associationism—that thrived during the nineteenth century. In addition it stimulated interest in the processes of child development and human learning; Locke's model of the way in which the “blank tablet” of the human mind became “furnished” with simple ideas that were eventually combined or abstracted in various ways to form complex ideas, suggested to some that it might be fruitful to study this process in the course of development of a young child (Cleverley and Phillips, 1986).
Fifth, and finally, there is a large body of work that clearly falls within the more technically-defined domain of philosophy of education. Three historical giants of the field are Plato, Rousseau, and Dewey, and there are a dozen or more who would be in competition for inclusion along with them; the short-list of leading authors from the second-half of the 20 th century would include Richard Peters, Paul Hirst, and Israel Scheffler, with many jostling for the next places—but the choices become cloudy as we approach the present-day, for schisms between philosophical schools have to be negotiated.
It is important to note, too, that there is a sub-category within this domain of literature that is made-up of work by philosophers who are not primarily identified as philosophers of education, and who might or might not have had much to say directly about education, but whose philosophical work has been drawn upon by others and applied very fruitfully to educational issues. (A volume edited by Amelie Rorty contains essays on the education-related thought, or relevance, of many historically-important philosophers; significantly the essays are almost entirely written by philosophers rather than by members of the philosophy of education community. This is both their strength and weakness. See Rorty, 1998.)
The discussion will turn briefly to the difficulty in picturing the topography of the field that is presented by the influence of these philosophers.
As sketched earlier, the domain of education is vast, the issues it raises are almost overwhelmingly numerous and are of great complexity, and the social significance of the field is second to none. These features make the phenomena and problems of education of great interest to a wide range of socially-concerned intellectuals, who bring with them their own favored conceptual frameworks—concepts, theories and ideologies, methods of analysis and argumentation, metaphysical and other assumptions, criteria for selecting evidence that has relevance for the problems that they consider central, and the like. No wonder educational discourse has occasionally been likened to Babel, for the differences in backgrounds and assumptions means that there is much mutual incomprehension. In the midst of the melee sit the philosophers of education.
It is no surprise, then, to find that the significant intellectual and social trends of the past few centuries, together with the significant developments in philosophy, all have had an impact on the content and methods of argument in philosophy of education—Marxism, psycho-analysis, existentialism, phenomenology, positivism, post-modernism, pragmatism, neo-liberalism, the several waves of feminism, analytic philosophy in both its ordinary language and more formal guises, are merely the tip of the iceberg. It is revealing to note some of the names that were heavily-cited in a pair of recent authoritative handbooks in the field (according to the indices of the two volumes, and in alphabetical order): Adorno, Aristotle, Derrida, Descartes, Dewey, Habermas, Hegel, Horkheimer, Kant, Locke, Lyotard, Marx, Mill, Nietzsche, Plato, Rawls, Richard Rorty, Rousseau, and Wittgenstein (Curren 2003; Blake, Smeyers, Smith, and Standish 2003). Although this list conveys something of the diversity of the field, it fails to do it complete justice, for the influence of feminist philosophers is not adequately represented.
No one individual can have mastered work done by such a range of figures, representing as they do a number of quite different frameworks or approaches; and relatedly no one person stands as emblematic of the entire field of philosophy of education, and no one type of philosophical writing serves as the norm, either. At professional meetings, peace often reigns because the adherents of the different schools go their separate ways; but occasionally there are (intellectually) violent clashes, rivaling the tumult that greeted Derrida's nomination for an honorary degree at Cambridge in 1992. It is sobering to reflect that only a few decades have passed since practitioners of analytic philosophy of education had to meet in individual hotel rooms, late at night, at annual meetings of the Philosophy of Education Society in the USA, because phenomenologists and others barred their access to the conference programs; their path to liberation was marked by discord until, eventually, the compromise of “live and let live” was worked out (Kaminsky, 1996). Of course, the situation has hardly been better in the home discipline; an essay in Time magazine in 1966 on the state of the discipline of philosophy reported that adherents of the major philosophical schools “don't even understand one another”, and added that as a result “philosophy today is bitterly segregated. Most of the major philosophy departments and scholarly journals are the exclusive property of one sect or another” ( Time , reprinted in Lucas, 1969, 32). Traditionally there has been a time-lag for developments in philosophy to migrate over into philosophy of education, but in this respect at least the two fields have been on a par.
Inevitably, however, traces of discord remain, and some groups still feel disenfranchised, but they are not quite the same groups as a few decades ago—for new intellectual paradigms have come into existence, and their adherents are struggling to have their voices heard; and clearly it is the case that—reflecting the situation in 1966—many analytically-trained philosophers of education find postmodern writings incomprehensible while scholars in the latter tradition are frequently dismissive if not contemptuous of work done by the former group. In effect, then, the passage of time has made the field more—and not less—diffuse. All this is evident in a volume published in 1995 in which the editor attempted to break-down borders by initiating dialogue between scholars with different approaches to philosophy of education; her introductory remarks are revealing:
Philosophers of education reflecting on the parameters of our field are faced not only with such perplexing and disruptive questions as: What counts as Philosophy of Education and why?; but also Who counts as a philosopher of education and why?; and What need is there for Philosophy of Education in a postmodern context? Embedded in these queries we find no less provocative ones: What knowledge, if any, can or should be privileged and why?; and Who is in a position to privilege particular discursive practices over others and why? Although such questions are disruptive, they offer the opportunity to take a fresh look at the nature and purposes of our work and, as we do, to expand the number and kinds of voices participating in the conversation. (Kohli, 1995, xiv).
There is an inward-looking tone to the questions posed here: Philosophy of education should focus upon itself, upon its own contents, methods, and practitioners. And of course there is nothing new about this; for one thing, almost forty years ago a collection of readings—with several score of entries—was published under the title What is Philosophy of Education? (Lucas, 1969). It is worth noting, too, that the same attitude is not unknown in philosophy; Simmel is reputed to have said a century or so ago that philosophy is its own first problem.
Having described the general topography of the field of philosophy of education, the focus can change to pockets of activity where from the perspective of this author interesting philosophical work is being, or has been, done—and sometimes this work has been influential in the worlds of educational policy or practice. It is appropriate to start with a discussion of the rise and partial decline—but lasting influence of—analytic philosophy of education This approach (often called “APE” by both admirers and detractors) dominated the field in the English-speaking world for several decades after the second world war, and its eventual fate throws light on the current intellectual climate.
2. Analytic philosophy of education, and its influence
Conceptual analysis, careful assessment of arguments, the rooting out of ambiguity, the drawing of clarifying distinctions—which make up part at least of the philosophical analysis package—have been respected activities within philosophy from the dawn of the field. But traditionally they stood alongside other philosophical activities; in the Republic , for example, Plato was sometimes analytic, at other times normative, and on occasion speculative/metaphysical. No doubt it somewhat over-simplifies the complex path of intellectual history to suggest that what happened in the twentieth century—early on, in the home discipline itself, and with a lag of a decade or more in philosophy of education—is that philosophical analysis came to be viewed by some scholars as being the major philosophical activity (or set of activities), or even as being the only viable or reputable activity (for metaphysics was judged to be literally vacuous, and normative philosophy was viewed as being unable to provide compelling warrants for whatever moral and ethical positions were being advocated).
So, although analytic elements in philosophy of education can be located throughout intellectual history back to the ancient world, the pioneering work in the modern period entirely in an analytic mode was the short monograph by C.D. Hardie, Truth and Fallacy in Educational Theory (1941; reissued in 1962). In his Introduction, Hardie (who had studied with C.D. Broad and I.A. Richards) made it clear that he was putting all his eggs into the ordinary-language-analysis basket:
The Cambridge analytical school, led by Moore, Broad and Wittgenstein, has attempted so to analyse propositions that it will always be apparent whether the disagreement between philosophers is one concerning matters of fact, or is one concerning the use of words, or is, as is frequently the case, a purely emotive one. It is time, I think, that a similar attitude became common in the field of educational theory. (Hardie, 1962, xix)
The first object of his analytic scrutiny in the book was the view that “a child should be educated according to Nature”; he teased apart and critiqued various things that writers through the ages could possibly have meant by this, and very little remained standing by the end of the chapter. Then some basic ideas of Herbart and Dewey were subjected to similar treatment. Hardie's hard-nosed approach can be illustrated by the following: One thing that educationists mean by “education according to Nature” (later he turns to other things they might mean) is that “the teacher should thus act like a gardener” who fosters natural growth of his plants and avoids doing anything “unnatural”(Hardie, 1962, 3). He continues:
The crucial question for such a view of education is how far does this analogy hold? There is no doubt that there is some analogy between the laws governing the physical development of the child and the laws governing the development of a plant, and hence there is some justification for the view if applied to physical education. But the educationists who hold this view are not generally very much concerned with physical education, and the view is certainly false if applied to mental education. For some of the laws that govern the mental changes which take place in a child are the laws of learning …. [which] have no analogy at all with the laws which govern the interaction between a seed and its environment. (Hardie, 1962, 4)
About a decade after the end of the Second World War the floodgates opened and a stream of work in the analytic mode appeared; the following is merely a sample. D.J. O'Connor published An Introduction to Philosophy of Education (1957) in which, among other things, he argued that the word “theory” as it is used in educational contexts is merely a courtesy title, for educational theories are nothing like what bear this title in the natural sciences; Israel Scheffler, who became the paramount philosopher of education in North America, produced a number of important works including The Language of Education (1960), that contained clarifying and influential analyses of definitions (he distinguished reportive, stipulative, and programmatic types) and the logic of slogans (often these are literally meaningless, and should be seen as truncated arguments); Smith and Ennis edited the volume Language and Concepts in Education (1961); and R.D. Archambault edited Philosophical Analysis and Education (1965), consisting of essays by a number of British writers who were becoming prominent—most notably R.S. Peters (whose status in Britain paralleled that of Scheffler in the USA), Paul Hirst, and John Wilson. Topics covered in the Archambault volume were typical of those that became the “bread and butter” of analytic philosophy of education throughout the English-speaking world—education as a process of initiation, liberal education, the nature of knowledge, types of teaching, and instruction versus indoctrination.
Among the most influential products of APE was the analysis developed by Hirst and Peters (1970), and Peters (1973), of the concept of education itself. Using as a touchstone “normal English usage”, it was concluded that a person who has been educated (rather than instructed or indoctrinated) has been (i) changed for the better; (ii) this change has involved the acquisition of knowledge and intellectual skills, and the development of understanding; and (iii) the person has come to care for, or be committed to, the domains of knowledge and skill into which he or she has been initiated. The method used by Hirst and Peters comes across clearly in their handling of the analogy with the concept of “reform”, one they sometimes drew upon for expository purposes. A criminal who has been reformed has changed for the better, and has developed a commitment to the new mode of life (if one or other of these conditions does not hold, a speaker of standard English would not say the criminal has been reformed). Clearly the analogy with reform breaks down with respect to the knowledge and understanding conditions. Elsewhere Peters developed the fruitful notion of “education as initiation”.
The concept of indoctrination was also of great interest to analytic philosophers of education, for—it was argued—getting clear about precisely what constitutes indoctrination also would serve to clarify the border that demarcates it from acceptable educational processes. Unfortunately, ordinary language analysis did not lead to unanimity of opinion about where this border was located, and rival analyses of the concept were put forward (Snook, 1972). Thus, whether or not an instructional episode was a case of indoctrination was determined by: the content that had been taught; or by the intention of the instructor; or by the methods of instruction that had been used; or by the outcomes of the instruction; or, of course, by some combination of these. Adherents of the different analyses used the same general type of argument to make their case, namely, appeal to normal and aberrant usage. Two examples will be sufficient to make the point: (i) The first criterion mentioned above—the nature of the content being imparted—was supported by an argument that ran roughly as follows: “If some students have learned, as factual, some material that is patently incorrect (like ‘The capital city of Canada is Washington D.C.’), then they must have been indoctrinated. This conclusion is reinforced by the consideration that we would never say students must have been indoctrinated if they believe an item that is correct!” However, both portions of this argument have been challenged. (ii) The method criterion—how the knowledge was imparted to the students—usually was supported by an argument that, while different, clearly paralleled the previous one in its logic. It ran roughly like this: “We never would say that students had been indoctrinated by their teacher if he or she had fostered open inquiry and discussion, encouraged exploration in the library and on the net, allowed students to work in collaborative groups, and so on. However, if the teacher did not allow independent inquiry, quashed classroom questions, suppressed dissenting opinions, relied heavily on rewards and punishments, used repetition and fostered rote memorization, and so on, then it is likely we would say the students were being indoctrinated”. (The deeper issue in this second example is that the first method of teaching allows room for the operation of the learners' rationality, while the second method does not. Siegel, 1988, stresses this in his discussion of indoctrination.)
After a period of dominance, for a number of important reasons the influence of APE went into decline. First, there were growing criticisms that the work of analytic philosophers of education had become focused upon minutiae and in the main was bereft of practical import; I can offer as illustration a presidential address at a US Philosophy of Education Society annual meeting that was an hour-long discourse on the various meanings of the expression “I have a toothache”. (It is worth noting that the 1966 article in Time , cited earlier, had put forward the same criticism of mainstream philosophy.) Second, in the early 1970's radical students in Britain accused the brand of linguistic analysis practiced by R.S. Peters of conservatism, and of tacitly giving support to “traditional values”—they raised the issue of whose English usage was being analyzed?
Third, criticisms of language analysis in mainstream philosophy had been mounting for some time, and finally after a lag of many years were reaching the attention of philosophers of education. There even had been a surprising degree of interest in this arcane topic on the part of the general reading public in the UK as early as 1959, when Gilbert Ryle, editor of the journal Mind , refused to commission a review of Ernest Gellner's Words and Things (1959)—a detailed and quite acerbic critique of Wittgenstein's philosophy and its espousal of ordinary language analysis. (Ryle argued that Gellner's book was too insulting, a view that drew Bertrand Russell into the fray on Gellner's side—in the daily press, no less; Russell produced examples of insulting remarks drawn from the work of great philosophers of the past. See Mehta, 1963)
Richard Peters had been given warning that all was not well with APE at a conference in Canada in 1966; after delivering a paper on “The aims of education: A conceptual inquiry” that was based on ordinary language analysis, a philosopher in the audience (William Dray) asked Peters “ whose concepts do we analyze?” Dray went on to suggest that different people, and different groups within society, have different concepts of education. Five years before the radical students raised the same issue, Dray pointed to the possibility that what Peters had presented under the guise of a “logical analysis” was nothing but the favored usage of a certain class of persons—a class that Peters happened to identify with. (See Peters, 1973, where to the editor's credit the interaction with Dray is reprinted.)
Fourth, during the decade of the seventies when these various critiques of analytic philosophy were in the process of eroding its luster, a spate of translations from the Continent stimulated some philosophers of education in Britain and North America to set out in new directions, and to adopt a new style of writing and argumentation. Key works by Gadamer, Foucault, and Derrida appeared in English, and these were followed in 1984 by Lyotard's foundational work on The Postmodern Condition . The classic works of Heidegger and Husserl also found new admirers; and feminist philosophers of education were finding their voices—Maxine Greene published a number of pieces in the 1970s; the influential book by Nel Noddings, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education , appeared the same year as the work by Lyotard, followed a year later by Jane Roland Martin's Reclaiming a Conversation . APE was no longer the center of interest.
By the 1980s, the rather simple if not simplistic ordinary language analysis practiced in philosophy of education, was reeling under the attack from the combination of forces sketched above, but the analytic spirit lived on in the form of rigorous work done in other specialist areas of philosophy—work that trickled out and took philosophy of education in rich new directions. Technically-oriented epistemology, philosophy of science, and even metaphysics, flourished; as did the interrelated fields of social, political and moral philosophy. John Rawls published A Theory of Justice in 1971; a decade later MacIntyre's After Virtue appeared; and in another decade or so there was a flood of work on individualism, communitarianism, democratic citizenship, inclusion, exclusion, rights of children versus rights of parents, rights of groups (such as the Amish) versus rights of the larger polity. From the early 1990s philosophers of education have contributed significantly to the debates on these and related topics—indeed, this corpus of work illustrates that good philosophy of education flows seamlessly into work being done in mainstream areas of philosophy. Illustrative examples are Creating Citizens: Political Education and Liberal Democracy , Callan (1997); The Demands of Liberal Education , Levinson (1999); Social Justice and School Choice , Brighouse (2000); and Bridging Liberalism and Multiculturalism in American Education , Reich (2002). These works stand shoulder-to-shoulder with semi-classics on the same range of topics by Gutmann, Kymlicka, Macedo, and others. An excerpt from the book by Callan nicely illustrates that the analytic spirit lives on in this body of work; the broader topic being pursued is the status of the aims of education in a pluralistic society where there can be deep fundamental disagreements:
… the distinction must be underlined between the ends that properly inform political education and the extent to which we should tolerate deviations from those ends in a world where reasonable and unreasonable pluralism are entangled and the moral costs of coercion against the unreasonable variety are often prohibitive. Our theoretical as well as our commonsense discourse do not always respect the distinction…. If some of the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church conflict with our best theory of the ends of civic education, it does not follow that we have any reason to revise our theory; but neither does it mean we have any reason to impose these ends on Catholic schools and the families that they serve. (Callan, 1997, 44)
Callan and White (2003) have given an analysis of why the topics described above have become such a focus of attention. “What has been happening in philosophy of education in recent years”, they argue, mirrors “a wider self-examination in liberal societies themselves”. World events, from the fall of communism to the spread of ethnic conflicts “have all heightened consciousness of the contingency of liberal politics”. A body of work in philosophy, from the early Rawls on, has systematically examined (and critiqued) the foundations of liberalism, and philosophy of education has been drawn into the debates. Callan and White mention communitarianism as offering perhaps “the most influential challenge” to liberalism, and they write:
The debate between liberals and communitarians is far more than a theoretical diversion for philosophers and political scientists. At stake are rival understandings of what makes human lives and the societies in which they unfold both good and just, and derivatively, competing conceptions of the education needed for individual and social betterment. (Callan and White, 2003, 95-96)
It should be appended here that it is not only “external” world events that have stimulated this body of work; events internal to a number of democratic societies also have been significant. To cite one example that is prominent in the literature in North America at least, the US Supreme Court issued a ruling ( Wisconsin v. Yoder ) in which members of the Amish sect were allowed to withdraw their children from public schools before they had reached the age of sixteen—for, it had been argued, any deeper education would endanger the existence of the group and its culture. In assessing this decision—as of course philosophers have frequently done (see, for example, Kymlicka, 1995)—a balance has to be achieved between (i) the interest of civic society in having an informed, well-educated, participatory citizenry; (ii) the interest of the Amish as a group in preserving their own culture; and (iii) the interests of the Amish children, who have a right to develop into autonomous individuals who can make reflective decisions for themselves about the nature of the life they wish to lead. These are issues that fall squarely in the domain covered by the works mentioned above.
So much work is being produced on the complex and interrelated issues just outlined, that in a different context it seemed fair for me to remark (descriptively, and not judgmentally) that a veritable cottage industry had sprung up in post-Rawlsian philosophy of education. There are, of course, other areas of activity, where interesting contributions are being made, and the discusion will next turn to a sampling of these.
3. Other areas of contemporary activity
As was stressed at the outset, and illustrated with a cursory listing of examples, the field of education is huge and contains within it a virtually inexhaustible number of issues that are of philosophical interest. To attempt comprehensive coverage of how philosophers of education have been working within this thicket would be a quixotic task for a large single volume, and is out of the question for a solitary encyclopedia entry. Nevertheless, a valiant attempt to give an overview was made in the recent A Companion to the Philosophy of Education (Curren, 2003), which contained more than six-hundred pages divided into fourty-five chapters each of which surveyed a subfield of work. The following random selection of chapter topics gives a sense of the enormous scope of the field: Sex education, special education, science education, aesthetic education, theories of teaching and learning, religious education, knowledge and truth in learning, cultivating reason, the measurement of learning, multicultural education, education and the politics of identity, education and standards of living, motivation and classroom management, feminism, critical theory, postmodernism, romanticism, purposes of universities in a fluid age, affirmative action in higher education, and professional education.
There is no non-arbitrary way to select a small number of topics for further discussion, nor can the topics that are chosen be pursued in great depth. The choice of those below has been made with an eye to filling out—and deepening—the topographical account of the field that was presented in the preceding sections. The discussion will open with a topic that was not included in the Companion , despite it being one that is of great concern across the academic educational community, and despite it being one where adherents of some of the rival schools of philosophy (and philosophy of education) have had lively exchanges.
The educational research enterprise has been criticized for a century or more by politicians, policymakers, administrators, curriculum developers, teachers, philosophers of education, and by researchers themselves—but the criticisms have been contradictory. Charges of being “too ivory tower and theory-oriented” are found alongside “too focused on practice and too atheoretical”; but particularly since publication of the book by Stokes mentioned earlier, and also in light of the views of John Dewey and William James that the function of theory is to guide intelligent practice and problem-solving, it is becoming more fashionable to hold that the “theory v. practice” dichotomy is a false one.
A similar trend can be discerned with respect to the long warfare between two rival groups of research methods—on one hand quantitative/statistical approaches to research, and on the other hand the qualitative/ethnographic family. (The choice of labels here is its not entirely risk-free, for they have been contested; furthermore the first approach is quite often associated with “experimental” studies, and the latter with “case studies”, but this is an over-simplification.) For several decades these two rival methodological camps were treated by researchers and a few philosophers of education as being rival paradigms (Kuhn's ideas, albeit in a very loose form, have been influential in the field of educational research), and the dispute between them was commonly referred-to as “the paradigm wars”. In essence the issue at stake was epistemolgical: members of the quantitative/experimental camp believed that only their methods could lead to well-warranted knowledge claims, especially about the causal factors at play in educational phenomena, and on the whole they regarded qualitative methods as lacking in rigor; on the other hand the adherents of qualitative/ethnographic approaches held that the other camp was too “positivistic” and was operating with an inadequate view of causation in human affairs—one that ignored the role of motives and reasons, possession of relevant background knowledge, awareness of cultural norms, and the like. Few if any commentators in the “paradigm wars” suggested that there was anything prohibiting the use of both approaches in the one research program—provided that if both were used, they only were used sequentially or in parallel, for they were underwritten by different epistemologies and hence could not be blended together. But recently the trend has been towards rapprochement, towards the view that the two methodological families are, in fact, compatible and are not at all like paradigms in the Kuhnian sense(s) of the term; the melding of the two approaches is often called “mixed methods research”, and it is growing in popularity. (For more detailed discussion of these “wars” see Howe, 2003, and Phillips, 2008.)
The most lively contemporary debates about education research, however, were set in motion around the turn of the millenium when the US Federal Government moved in the direction of funding only rigorously scientific educational research—the kind that could establish causal factors which could then guide the development of practically effective policies. (It was held that such a causal knowledge base was available for medical decisionmaking.) The definition of “rigorously scientific”, however, was decided by politicans and not by the research community, and it was given in terms of the use of a specific research method—the net effect being that the only research projects to receive Federal funding were those that carried out randomized controlled experiments or field trials (RFTs). It has beome common over the last decade to refer to the RFT as the “gold standard” methodology.
The National Research Council (NRC)—an arm of the U.S. National Academies of Science—issued a report, influenced by postpostivistic philosophy of science (NRC, 2002), that argued this criterion was far too narrow. Numerous essays have appeared subsequently that point out how the “gold standard” account of scientific rigor distorts the history of science, how the complex nature of the relation between evidence and policy-making has been distorted and made to appear overly simple (for instance the role of value-judgments in linking empirical findings to policy directives is often overlooked), and qualitative researchers have insisted upon the scientific nature of their work.
Nevertheless, and possibly because it tried to be balanced and supported the use of RFTs in some research contexts, the NRC report has been the subject of symposia in four journals, where it has been supported by a few and attacked from a variety of philosophical fronts: Its authors were positivists, they erroneously believed that educational inquiry could be value-neutral and that it could ignore the ways in which exercise of power constrains the research process, they misunderstood the nature of educational phenomena, they were guilty of advocating “your father's paradigm”(clearly this was not intended as a compliment). One critic with postmodernist leanings asserted that educational research should move “toward a Nietzschean sort of ‘unnatural science’ that leads to greater health by fostering ways of knowing that escape normativity”—a suggestion that evokes the reaction discussed in Section 1.3 above, namely, one of incomprehension on the part of most researchers and those philosophers of education who work within a different tradition where a “way of knowing”, in order to be a “way”, must inevitably be normative.
The final complexity in the debates over the nature of educational research is that there are some respected members of the philosophy of education community who claim, along with Carr, that “the forms of human association characteristic of educational engagement are not really apt for scientific or empirical study at all” (Carr, 2003, 54-5). His reasoning is that educational processes cannot be studied empirically because they are processes of “normative initiation”—a position that as it stands begs the question by not making clear why such processes cannot be studied empirically.
The issue of what should be taught to students at all levels of education—the issue of curriculum content—obviously is a fundamental one, and it is an extraordinarily difficult one with which to grapple. In tackling it, care needs to be taken to distinguish between education and schooling—for although education can occur in schools, so can mis-education (as Dewey pointed out), and many other things can take place there that are educationally orthogonal (such as the provision of free or subsidized lunches, or the development of social networks); and it also must be recognized that education can occur in the home, in libraries and museums, in churches and clubs, in solitary interaction with the public media, and the like.
In developing a curriculum (whether in a specific subject area, or more broadly as the whole range of offerings in an educational institution or in a system), a number of difficult decisions need to be made. Issues such as the proper ordering or sequencing of topics in the chosen subject, the time to be allocated to each topic, the lab work or excursions or projects that are appropriate for particular topics, can all be regarded as technical issues best resolved either by educationists who have a depth of experience with the target age group or by experts in the psychology of learning and the like. But there are deeper issues, ones concerning the validity of the justifications that have been given for including particular subjects or topics in the offerings of formal educational institutions. (Why is evolution included, or excluded, as a topic within the standard high school subject Biology? Why is Driver Education part of the high school curriculum, and methods of birth control usually not—even though sex has an impact on the life of teenagers that at least is comparable to the impact of car-driving? Is the justification that is given for teaching Economics in some schools coherent and convincing? Does the justification for not including the Holocaust or the phenomenon of wartime atrocities in the curriculum in some countries stand up to critical scrutiny?)
The different justifications for particular items of curriculum content that have been put forward by philosophers and others since Plato's brilliant pioneering efforts all draw upon, explicitly or implicitly, the positions that the respective theorists hold about at least three sets of issues. First, what are the aims and/or functions of education (aims and functions are not necessarily the same), or alternatively, what constitutes the good life and human flourishing. These two formulations are related, for presumably our educational institutions should aim to equip individuals to pursue this good life. Thus, for example, if our view of human flourishing includes the capacity to act rationally and/or autonomously, then the case can be made that educational institutions—and their curricula—should aim to prepare, or help to prepare, autonomous individuals. How this is to be done, of course, is not immediately obvious, and much philosophical ink has been spilled on the matter. One influential line of argument was developed by Paul Hirst, who argued that knowledge is essential for developing a conception of the good life, and then for pursuing it; and because logical analysis shows—he argued—that there are seven basic forms of knowledge, the case can be made that the function of the curriculum is to introduce students to each of these forms. Luckily for Hirst, the typical British high school day was made up of seven instructional periods. (Hirst, 1965; for a critique see Phillips, 1987, ch.11.)
Second, is it justifiable to treat the curriculum of an educational institution as vehicle for furthering the socio-political interests and goals of a ruler or ruling class; and relatedly, is it justifiable to design the curriculum so that it serves as a medium of control or of social engineering? In the closing decades of the twentieth century there were numerous discussions of curriculum theory, particularly from Marxist and postmodern perspectives, that offered the sobering analysis that in many educational systems, including those in Western democracies, the curriculum did indeed reflect, and serve, the interests of the ruling class. Michael Apple is typical:
… the knowledge that now gets into schools is already a choice from a much larger universe of possible social knowledge and principles. It is a form of cultural capital that comes from somewhere, that often reflects the perspectives and beliefs of powerful segments of our social collectivity. In its very production and dissemination as a public and economic commodity—as books, films, materials, and so forth—it is repeatedly filtered through ideological and economic commitments. Social and economic values, hence, are already embedded in the design of the institutions we work in, in the ‘formal corpus of school knowledge’ we preserve in our curricula….(Apple, 1990, 8-9)
Third, should educational programs at the elementary and secondary levels be made up of a number of disparate offerings, so that individuals with different interests and abilities and affinities for learning can pursue curricula that are suitable? Or should every student pursue the same curriculum as far as each is able—a curriculum, it should be noted, that in past cases nearly always was based on the needs or interests of those students who were academically inclined or were destined for elite social roles. Mortimer Adler and others in the late twentieth century (who arguably were following Plato's lead in the Republic ), sometimes used the aphorism “the best education for the best is the best education for all”.
The thinking here can be explicated in terms of the analogy of an out-of-control virulent disease, for which there is only one type of medicine available; taking a large dose of this medicine is extremely beneficial, and the hope is that taking only a little—while less effective—is better than taking none at all! Medically, this probably is dubious, while the educational version—forcing students to work, until they exit the system, on topics that do not interest them and for which they have no facility or motivation—has even less merit. (For a critique of Adler and his Paideia Proposal , see Noddings, 2007.) It is interesting to compare the modern “one curriculum track for all” position with Plato's system outlined in the Republic , according to which all students—and importantly this included girls—set out on the same course of study. Over time, as they moved up the educational ladder it would become obvious that some had reached the limit imposed upon them by nature, and they would be directed off into appropriate social roles in which they would find fulfillment, for their abilities would match the demands of these roles. Those who continued on with their education would eventually be able to contemplate the metaphysical realm of the “forms”, thanks to their advanced training in mathematics and philosophy. Having seen the form of the Good, they would be eligible after a period of practical experience to become members of the ruling class of Guardians.
Plato's educational scheme was guided, presumably, by the understanding he thought he had achieved of the transcendental realm of fixed “forms”. John Dewey, ever a strong critic of positions that were not naturalistic, or that incorporated a priori premises, commented as follows:
Plato's starting point is that the organization of society depends ultimately upon knowledge of the end of existence. If we do not know its end, we shall be at the mercy of accident and caprice…. And only those who have rightly trained minds will be able to recognize the end, and ordering principle of things. (Dewey, 1916, 102-3)
Furthermore, as Dewey again put it, Plato “had no perception of the uniqueness of individuals…. they fall by nature into classes”, which masks the “infinite diversity of active tendencies” which individuals harbor (104). In addition, Plato tended to talk of learning using the passive language of seeing, which has shaped our discourse down to the present (witness “Now I see it!” when a difficult point has become clear).
In contrast, for Dewey each individual was an organism situated in a biological and social environment in which problems were constantly emerging, forcing the individual to reflect and act, and learn. Dewey, following William James, held that knowledge arises from reflection upon our actions; and the worth of a putative item of knowledge is directly correlated with the problem-solving success of the actions performed under its guidance. Thus Dewey, sharply disagreeing with Plato, regarded knowing as an active rather than a passive affair—a strong theme in his writings is his opposition to what is sometimes called “the spectator theory of knowledge”. All this is made clear enough in a passage containing only a thinly-veiled allusion to Plato's famous analogy of the prisoners in the cave whose eyes are turned to the light by education:
In schools, those under instruction are too customarily looked upon as acquiring knowledge as theoretical spectators, minds which appropriate knowledge by direct energy of intellect. The very word pupil has almost come to mean one who is engaged not in having fruitful experiences but in absorbing knowledge directly. Something which is called mind or consciousness is severed from the physical organs of activity. (164)
This passage also illuminates a passage that many have found puzzling: “philosophy is the theory of education” (387). For in the sentences above it is easy to see the tight link between Dewey's epistemology and his views on education—his anti-spectator epistemology morphs directly into advocacy for anti-spectator learning by students in school—students learn by being active inquirers. Over the past few decades this view of learning has inspired a major tradition of research by educational psychologists, and related theory-development (the “situated cognition” framework); and these bodies of work have in turn led to innovative efforts in curriculum development. (For a discussion of these, see Phillips, 2003.)
The final important difference with Plato is that, for Dewey, each student is an individual who blazes his or her unique trail of growth; the teacher has the task of guiding and facilitating this growth, without imposing a fixed end upon the process. Dewey sometimes uses the term “curriculum” to mean “the funded wisdom of the human race”, the point being that over the course of human history an enormous stock of knowledge and skills has accumulated and the teacher has the task of helping the student to make contact with this repertoire—but helping by facilitating rather than by imposing. (All this, of course, has been the subject of intense discussion among philosophers of education: Does growth imply a direction? Is growth always good—can't a plant end up misshapen, and can't a child develop to become bad? Is Dewey some type of perfectionist? Is his philosophy too vague to offer worthwhile educational guidance? Isn't it possible for a “Deweyan” student to end up without enough relevant knowledge and skills to be able to make a living in the modern world?)
Dewey's work was of central importance for the American progressive education movement in its formative years, although there was a fair degree of misunderstanding of his ideas as progressives interpreted his often extremely dense prose to be saying what they personally happened to believe. Nevertheless, Dewey became the “poster child” or the “house philosopher” of progressive education, and if he didn't make it onto many actual posters he certainly made it onto a postage stamp.
His popularity, however, sharply declined after the Soviets launched Sputnik, for Dewey and progressive education were blamed for the USA losing the race into space (illustrating the point about scapegoating made at the start of this essay). But he did not remain in disgrace for long; and for some time has been the focus of renewed interest—although it is still noticeable that commentators interpret Dewey to be holding views that mirror their own positions or interests. And interestingly, there now is slightly more interest in Dewey on the part of philosophers of education in the UK than there was in earlier years, and there is growing interest by philosophers from the Continent (see, for example, Biesta and Burbules, 2003).
To be a poster child for progressivism, however, is not to be the parent. Rather than to Dewey, that honor must go to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and to his educational novel written in soaring prose, Emile (1762). Starting with the premise that “God makes all things good; man meddles with them and they become evil” (Rousseau, 1955, 5), Rousseau held that contemporary man has been misshapen by his education; the “crushing force” of social conventions has stifled the “Nature within him”. The remedy adopted in the novel is for the young Emile to be taken to his family estate in the country where, away from the corrupting influence of society, and under the watchful eye of his tutor, “everything should … be brought into harmony with these natural tendencies”. (This idea of education according to nature, it will be recalled, was the object of Hardie's analytic attention almost two centuries later.)
Out in the countryside, rather than having a set curriculum that he is forced to follow, Emile learns when some natural stimulus or innate interest motivates him—and under these conditions learning comes easily. He is allowed to suffer the natural consequences of his actions (if he breaks a window, he gets cold; if he takes the gardener's property, the gardener will no longer do him favors), and experiences such as these lead to the development of his moral system. Although Rousseau never intended these educational details to be taken literally as a blueprint (he saw himself as developing and illustrating the basic principles), over the ages there have been attempts to implement them, one being the famous British “free school”, A.S. Neill's Summerhill. (It is worth noting that Neill claimed not to have read Rousseau; but he was working in a milieu in which Rousseau's ideas were well-known—intellectual influence can follow a less than direct path.) Furthermore, over the ages these principles also have proven to be fertile soil for philosophers of education to till.
Even more fertile ground for comment, in recent years, has been Rousseau's proposal for the education of girls, developed in a section of the novel (Book V) that bears the name of the young woman who is destined to be Emile's soul-mate, Sophy. The puzzle has been why Rousseau—who had been so far-sighted in his discussion of Emile's education—was so hide-bound if not retrograde in his thinking about her education. One short quotation is sufficient to illustrate the problem: “If woman is made to please and to be in subjection to man, she ought to make herself pleasing in his eyes and not provoke him …her strength is in her charms” (324).
The educational principles developed by Rousseau and Dewey, and numerous educational theorists and philosophers in the interregnum, are alive and well in the twenty-first century. Of particular contemporary interest is the evolution that has occurred of the progressive idea that each student is an active learner who is pursuing his or her own individual educational path. By incorporating elements of the classical empiricist epistemology of John Locke, this progressive principle has become transformed into the extremely popular position known as constructivism, according to which each student in a classroom constructs his or her own individual body of understandings even when all in the group are given what appears to be the same stimulus or educational experience. (A consequence of this is that a classroom of thirty students will have thirty individually-constructed, and possibly different, bodies of “knowledge”, in addition to that of the teacher!) There is also a solipsistic element here, for constructivists also believe that none of us—teachers included—can directly access the bodies of understandings of anyone else; each of us is imprisoned in a world of our own making. It is an understatement to say that this poses great difficulties for the teacher. The education journals of the past two decades contain many thousands of references to discussions of this position, which elsewhere I claimed has become a type of educational “secular religion”; for reasons that are hard to discern it is particularly influential in mathematics and science education. (For a discussion of the underlying philosophical ideas in constructivism, and for an account of some of its varieties, see the essays in Phillips, ed., 2000.)
As stressed earlier, it is impossible to do justice the whole field of philosophy of education in a single encyclopedia entry. Different countries around the world—France, Germany, the Netherlands, Japan, to mention only a few—have their own intellectual traditions, and their own ways of institutionalizing philosophy of education into the academic universe, and no discussion of any of this appears in the present essay. But even in the Anglo-American world, there is such a diversity of approaches to the discipline that any author attempting to produce a synoptic account will quickly run into the borders of his or her areas of competence. Clearly this has happened in the present case.
Fortunately, in the last twenty years or so resources have become available that significantly alleviate these problems. There has been a flood of encyclopedia entries, commenting on the field as a whole or on many specific topics not well-covered in the present essay (see, as a sample, Burbules, 1994; Chambliss, 1996; Phillips, 1985; Siegel, 2007; Smeyers, 1994); two large volumes—a “Guide” (Blake, Smeyers, Smith and Standish, 2003) and a “Companion” (Curren, 2003)—have been produced by Blackwell in their well-known philosophy series; and the same publisher recently released an anthology, with 60 papers considered to be important in the field, and which also are representative of the range of work that is being done (Curren, 2007). Several encyclopedias of philosophy of education have been published or are in the works (for example, Chambliss, 1996; Siegel, 2008); there is a dictionary of key concepts in the field (Winch and Gingell, 1999), and a good textbook or two (see Noddings, 2007); in addition there are numerous volumes both of reprinted selections and of specially commissioned essays on specific topics, some of which were given short shrift in the present work (for another sampling see A. Rorty, 1998; Smeyers and Marshall, 1995; Stone, 1994); and several international journals appear to be flourishing— Educational Philosophy and Theory , Educational Theory , Journal of Philosophy of Education , Studies in Philosophy and Education , Theory and Research in Education . Thus there is enough material available to keep the interested reader busy, and to provide alternative assessments to the ones presented in this present essay.
- Apple, M., 1990, Ideology and Curriculum , New York: Routledge, 2 nd . Editon.
- Archambault, R., (ed.), 1965, Philosophical Analysis and Education , London: Routledge.
- Biesta, G., and Burbules, N., 2003, Pragmatism and Educational Research , Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., and Standish, P., (eds.), 2003, The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education , Oxford: Blackwell.
- Brighouse, H., 2000, Social Justice and School Choice , Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Burbules, N., 1994, “Marxism and Educational Thought”, in The International Encyclopedia of Education , (Volume 6), T. Husen and N. Postlethwaite (eds.), Oxford: Pergamon, 2 nd . Edition, pp. 3617-22.
- Callan, E., 1997, Creating Citizens: Political Education and Liberal Democracy , Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- Callan, E., and White, J., 2003, “Liberalism and Communitarianism”, in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education , N. Blake, P. Smeyers, R. Smith and P. Standish (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp.95-109.
- Carr, D., 2003, Making Sense of Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy and Theory of Education and Teaching , London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Chambliss, J., 1996, “History of Philosophy of Education”, in Philosophy of Education: An Encyclopedia , J. Chambliss (ed.), New York: Garland, pp.461-72.
- Cleverley, J., and Phillips, D.C., 1986, Visions of Childhood , New York: Teachers College Press.
- Curren, R., (ed.), 2003, A Companion to the Philosophy of Education , Oxford: Blackwell.
- Curren, R., (ed.), 2007, Philosophy of Education: An Anthology , Oxford: Blackwell.
- Dewey, J., 1916, Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education , New York: Macmillan.
- Gellner, E., 1959, Words and Things , London: Gollancz.
- Hardie, C., 1962, Truth and Fallacy in Educational Theory , New York: Teachers College Bureau of Publications.
- Hirst, P., 1965, “Liberal Education and the Nature of Knowledge”, in Philosophical Analysis and Education , R. Archambault, (ed.), London: Routledge, pp. 113-138.
- Hirst, P., and Peters, R., 1970, The Logic of Education , London: Routledge.
- Howe, K., 2003, Closing Methodological Divides: Toward Democratic Educational Research . Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Kaminsky, J., 1996, “Philosophy of Education: Professional Organizations In”, in Philosophy of Education: An Encyclopedia , J. Chambliss, (ed.), New York: Garland, pp. 475-79.
- Kohli, W., (ed.), 1995, Critical Conversations in Philosophy of Education , New York: Routledge.
- Kymlicka, W., 1995, Multicultural Citizenship , Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- Levinson, M., 1999, The Demands of Liberal Education , Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lucas, C., (ed.), 1969, What is Philosophy of Education? London: Macmillan.
- Martin, J., 1985, Reclaiming a Conversation , New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
- Mehta, V., 1963, Fly and the Fly-Bottle : London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
- Murphy, M., (ed.), 2006, The History and Philosophy of Education: Voices of Educational Pioneers , New Jersey: Pearson.
- Noddings, N., 1984, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education , Berkeley: University of California Press.
- –––, 2007, Philosophy of Education , Boulder, CO: Westview, 2 nd . Edition.
- National Research Council (NRC), 2002, Scientific Research in Education , Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- O'Connor, D., 1957, An Introduction to Philosophy of Education , London: Routledge.
- Peters, R., (ed.), 1973, The Philosophy of Education , Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Phillips, D.C., 1985, “Philosophy of Education”, in International Encyclopedia of Education, T. Husen and N. Postletwaite, (eds.), pp.3859-3877.
- –––, 1987, Philosophy, Science, and Social Inquiry , Oxford: Pergamon.
- –––, (ed.), 2000, Constructivism in Education: Opinions and Second Opinions on Controversial Issues , (Series: 99 th . Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- –––, 2003, “Theories of Teaching and Learning”, in A Companion to the Philosophy of Education , R. Curren, (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 232-245.
- –––, 2008, “Empirical Educational Research: Charting Philosophical Disagreements in an Undisciplined Field”, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education , H. Siegel (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, in press.
- Reich, R., 2002, Bridging Liberalism and Multiculturalism in American Education , Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Rorty, A., (ed.), 1998, Philosophers on Education: New Historical Perspectives , New York: Routledge.
- Rousseau, J-J., 1955, Emile , B. Foxley, (tr.), London: Dent/Everyman.
- Scheffler, I., 1960, The Language of Education , Illinois: Thomas.
- Siegel, H., 1988, Educating Reason: rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education , New York: Routledge.
- –––, 2007, “Philosophy of Education”, in Britannica Online Encyclopedia , [ Available online ].
- –––, (ed.), 2008, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education , Oxford: Oxford University Press, in press.
- Smeyers, P., 1994, “Philosophy of Education: Western European Perspectives”, in The International Encyclopedia of Education , (Volume 8), T. Husen and N. Postlethwaite, (eds.), Oxford: Pergamon, 2 nd . Edition, pp. 4456-61.
- Smeyers, P., and Marshall, J., (eds.), 1995, Philosophy and Education: Accepting Wittgenstein's Challenge , Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Smith, B., and Ennis, R., (eds.), 1961, Language and Concepts in Education , Chicago: Rand McNally.
- Snook, I., 1972, Indoctrination and Education , London: Routledge.
- Stokes, D., 1997, Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , Washington, DC: Brookings.
- Stone, L., (ed.), 1994, The Education Feminism Reader , New York: Routledge.
- Ulich, R., 1954, Three Thousand Years of Educational Wisdom , Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Revised Ed.
- Winch, C., and Gingell, J., 1999, Key Concepts in the Philosophy of Education , London: Routledge.
- PES (Philosophy of Education Society, North America)
- PESA (Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia)
- PESGB (Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain)
- INPE (International Network of Philosophers of Education)
- UNESCO/International Bureau of Education: Thinkers on Education
autonomy: personal | -->Dewey, John --> | feminist (interventions): ethics | feminist (interventions): liberal feminism | feminist (interventions): political philosophy | -->feminist (topics): perspectives on autonomy --> | feminist (topics): perspectives on disability | Foucault, Michel | Gadamer, Hans-Georg | liberalism | Locke, John | -->Lyotard, Jean François --> | -->ordinary language --> | Plato | postmodernism | Rawls, John | rights: of children | -->Rousseau, Jean Jacques -->
![what is a personal philosophy of education Encyclopedia Britannica](https://cdn.britannica.com/mendel/eb-logo/MendelNewThistleLogo.png)
- History & Society
- Science & Tech
- Biographies
- Animals & Nature
- Geography & Travel
- Arts & Culture
- Games & Quizzes
- On This Day
- One Good Fact
- New Articles
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- World History
- Health & Medicine
- Browse Biographies
- Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
- Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
- Environment
- Fossils & Geologic Time
- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- Demystified
- Image Galleries
- Infographics
- Top Questions
- Britannica Kids
- Saving Earth
- Space Next 50
- Student Center
- Introduction
Principal historical figures
- The aims of education
- Clarification of educational concepts
- Rights, power, and authority
- Critical thinking
- Indoctrination
- The individual and society
- Moral education
- Teaching, learning, and curriculum
- Educational research
- Feminist, multiculturalist, and postmodern criticisms
![what is a personal philosophy of education Socrates](https://cdn.britannica.com/37/167637-004-F38182D3/Socrates-Roman-fresco-Selcuk-Turkey-Ephesus-Museum.jpg)
- Why is Jean-Jacques Rousseau famous?
- What are John Locke’s most famous works?
- What contributions did John Locke make to epistemology?
- What contributions did John Locke make to political theory?
- How did John Locke influence the design of U.S. government?
![what is a personal philosophy of education NBA Lakers Celtics Finals Kevin Garnett shooting.](https://cdn.britannica.com/53/189653-131-A7E9422A/Kevin-Garnett-shooting-Ronny-Turiaf-Boston-Celtics-2008.jpg?w=200&h=200&c=crop)
philosophy of education
Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.
- StateUniversity.com - Education Encyclopedia - Philosophy of Education
- Kansas State University Libraries - Center for the Advancement of Digital Scholarship - Foundational Philosophies of Education
- Social Science LibreTexts - What are philosophies of education?
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Philosophy of Education
- Wrexham Glyndwr University - What is the philosophy of education?
- The Basics of Philosophy - Philosophy of Education
- Table Of Contents
![what is a personal philosophy of education Socrates](https://cdn.britannica.com/37/167637-050-DB43C232/Socrates-Roman-fresco-Selcuk-Turkey-Ephesus-Museum.jpg?w=400&h=300&c=crop)
philosophy of education , philosophical reflection on the nature, aims, and problems of education . The philosophy of education is Janus -faced, looking both inward to the parent discipline of philosophy and outward to educational practice. (In this respect it is like other areas of “applied” philosophy, such as the philosophy of law , the philosophy of science , and the philosophy of medicine, including bioethics .) This dual focus requires it to work on both sides of the traditional divide between theory and practice, taking as its subject matter both basic philosophical issues (e.g., the nature of knowledge) and more specific issues arising from educational practice (e.g., the desirability of standardized testing). These practical issues in turn have implications for a variety of long-standing philosophical problems in epistemology , metaphysics , ethics , and political philosophy . In addressing these many issues and problems, the philosopher of education strives for conceptual clarity, argumentative rigour, and informed valuation.
(Read Arne Duncan’s Britannica essay on “Education: The Great Equalizer.”)
The history of philosophy of education is an important source of concerns and issues—as is the history of education itself—for setting the intellectual agenda of contemporary philosophers of education. Equally relevant is the range of contemporary approaches to the subject. Although it is not possible here to review systematically either that history or those contemporary approaches, brief sketches of several key figures are offered next.
The Western philosophical tradition began in ancient Greece, and philosophy of education began with it. The major historical figures developed philosophical views of education that were embedded in their broader metaphysical , epistemological, ethical , and political theories. The introduction by Socrates of the “Socratic method” of questioning ( see dialectic ) began a tradition in which reasoning and the search for reasons that might justify beliefs, judgments, and actions was (and remains) fundamental; such questioning in turn eventually gave rise to the view that education should encourage in all students and persons, to the greatest extent possible, the pursuit of the life of reason. This view of the central place of reason in education has been shared by most of the major figures in the history of philosophy of education, despite the otherwise substantial differences in their other philosophical views.
![what is a personal philosophy of education what is a personal philosophy of education](https://cdn.britannica.com/88/149188-050-DC34842F/Plato-portrait-bust-original-Capitoline-Museums-Rome.jpg?w=300)
Socrates’ student Plato endorsed that view and held that a fundamental task of education is that of helping students to value reason and to be reasonable, which for him involved valuing wisdom above pleasure, honour, and other less-worthy pursuits. In his dialogue Republic he set out a vision of education in which different groups of students would receive different sorts of education, depending on their abilities, interests, and stations in life. His utopian vision has been seen by many to be a precursor of what has come to be called educational “sorting.” Millennia later, the American pragmatist philosopher John Dewey (1859–1952) argued that education should be tailored to the individual child, though he rejected Plato’s hierarchical sorting of students into categories.
![what is a personal philosophy of education what is a personal philosophy of education](https://cdn.britannica.com/84/87984-050-7C5547FE/Detail-Roman-copy-portrait-bust-Aristotle-Greek.jpg?w=300)
Plato’s student Aristotle also took the highest aim of education to be the fostering of good judgment or wisdom, but he was more optimistic than Plato about the ability of the typical student to achieve it. He also emphasized the fostering of moral virtue and the development of character; his emphasis on virtue and his insistence that virtues develop in the context of community-guided practice—and that the rights and interests of individual citizens do not always outweigh those of the community—are reflected in contemporary interest in “virtue theory” in ethics and “communitarianism” in political philosophy.
![what is a personal philosophy of education what is a personal philosophy of education](https://cdn.britannica.com/18/60018-050-E8F7CB20/Jean-Jacques-Rousseau-pastels-Maurice-Quentin-de-La-Tour-1753.jpg?w=300)
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–78) famously insisted that formal education, like society itself, is inevitably corrupting; he argued that education should enable the “natural” and “free” development of children, a view that eventually led to the modern movement known as “open education.” These ideas are in some ways reflected in 20th-century “progressivism,” a movement often (but not always accurately) associated with Dewey. Unlike Plato, Rousseau also prescribed fundamentally distinct educations for boys and girls, and in doing so he raised issues concerning gender and its place in education that are of central concern today. Dewey emphasized the educational centrality of experience and held that experience is genuinely educational only when it leads to “growth.” But the idea that the aim of education is growth has proved to be a problematic and controversial one, and even the meaning of the slogan is unclear. Dewey also emphasized the importance of the student’s own interests in determining appropriate educational activities and ends-in-view; in this respect he is usually seen as a proponent of “child-centred” education, though he also stressed the importance of students’ understanding of traditional subject matter. While these Deweyan themes are strongly reminiscent of Rousseau, Dewey placed them in a far more sophisticated—albeit philosophically contentious—context. He emphasized the central importance of education for the health of democratic social and political institutions, and he developed his educational and political views from a foundation of systematic metaphysics and epistemology.
Of course, the history of philosophy of education includes many more figures than Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Rousseau, and Dewey. Other major philosophers, including Thomas Aquinas , Augustine , Thomas Hobbes , René Descartes , John Locke , David Hume , Immanuel Kant , John Stuart Mill , Karl Marx , Bertrand Russell , and, more recently, R.S. Peters in Britain and Israel Scheffler in the United States , have also made substantial contributions to educational thought. It is worth noting again that virtually all these figures, despite their many philosophical differences and with various qualifications and differences of emphasis, take the fundamental aim of education to be the fostering of rationality ( see reason ). No other proposed aim of education has enjoyed the positive endorsement of so many historically important philosophers—although, as will be seen below, this aim has come under increasing scrutiny in recent decades.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Play-based learning is a big part of my teaching philosophy. Kids who learn through play have more authentic experiences, exploring and discovering the world naturally in ways that make the process more engaging and likely to make a lasting impact. In my classroom, technology is key.
Think of educational philosophy as the personal beliefs a teacher has about education. It forms the backbone of how they plan their lessons and choose teaching methods. It evolves from deep thought about the nature of knowledge, understanding, and the significance of different subjects. When teachers create their educational philosophy, they ...
An example of a challenge you solved in the classroom. Conclusion. A good teacher is never done growing and learning. Wrap up your philosophy statement by describing your objectives, which should include student-oriented academic goals, professional development goals and the ideal outcomes of your teaching career.
Progressivism: This philosophy is all about learning by doing. Think of it as learning to swim by actually jumping in the water. These educators focus on hands-on experiences and making lessons relevant to real-life situations. Reconstructionism: This type of philosophy looks at education as a way to improve society.
A teaching philosophy is a statement that explains your perspective on teaching and describes how you plan to apply that perspective to a classroom environment. Many education degree programs require students to write a teaching philosophy statement before graduation. It's a way to organize your teaching process and approach to interacting with ...
Writing Your Teaching Philosophy. Your teaching philosophy is a self-reflective statement of your beliefs about teaching and learning. It's a one to two page narrative that conveys your core ideas about being an effective teacher in the context of your discipline. It develops these ideas with specific, concrete examples of what the teacher and ...
A statement of teaching philosophy, or teaching statement, is a summation of your teaching strategies, beliefs, and practices, along with concrete examples of the ways those beliefs materialize in the learning environment, curriculum development, and more. It is developed over the course of an educator's career and experiences, and it stays ...
Follow these seven steps to write your teaching philosophy statement: 1. Consider your audience. Before you begin writing your teaching philosophy statement, begin by considering your audience and what may be of greatest importance to them. If you're writing for a hiring committee, know that they may be interested in both the internal and ...
A teaching philosophy is your personal belief system on how to handle an educational role. Your philosophy reveals what you value, what you think is ethical, and what you believe the overall purpose of teaching is. A well-defined teaching philosophy will succinctly sum up what effective teaching looks like to you.
Philosophy of Education. Philosophy of education is the branch of applied or practical philosophy concerned with the nature and aims of education and the philosophical problems arising from educational theory and practice. Because that practice is ubiquitous in and across human societies, its social and individual manifestations so varied, and ...
Teachers who perform with a purpose will find themselves more focused, rejuvenated and excited. Through the various highs and lows, a teaching philosophy or "mission statement" helps an educator stay true to one's core beliefs. Writing a teaching philosophy statement may take some time, but most instructors will find the process easy once ...
Your teaching philosophy is what you believe is the best way to reach that purpose, and why. Your ideas about education and teaching should come from reflecting on your past experiences with education and the educational theories and research studies you have learned and explored. Beliefs, attitudes, values, and experiences influence a person's ...
Over the course of history, philosophy has experienced several paradigm shifts that influence teaching and learning. Philosophical traditions from the 19th century helped anchor the early foundations of educational philosophy and the development of public education in Europe and the United States. Activity - Think and Reflect.
Definition A teaching philosophy is a teacher's set of beliefs about their role and the goals of education. It's like a teacher's personal rule book for how to do their job. It influences how they teach, make important choices, and work with everyone at the school. A teaching philosophy isn't just a fancy thought—it helps teachers do their best in the classroom. If we take a step ...
A teaching philosophy statement, or an educational philosophy statement, is a brief essay that nearly all prospective teachers must write when applying for an academic position. The statement generally reflects on the writer's teaching beliefs and includes concrete examples of how those beliefs have informed the writer's teaching practices.
The Philosophy of Education Statement is an important piece in your educator portfolio. It may be requested by hiring personnel at schools to be included with a cover letter and resume. Your teaching philosophy should be thoughtful, organized and well-written. The summary should be between 1-2 pages and should document and support your core ...
1. Students need to learn. Students want and need to learn as much as they need food, clothing, and shelter. An educator's primary job is to fill that primal need for learning by creating engaging and relevant learning experiences every day. The greatest gift a teacher can give students is motivating them to experience repeated learning success.
A teaching philosophy is a reflection of your beliefs, values, and goals regarding teaching. It should also provide concrete examples of how you achieve these goals or endorse your beliefs in the classroom. In essence, its contents should represent who you are as a person and teacher. Tips for Writing Your Teaching Philosophy Statement Please […]
This is a file in the archives of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Philosophy of Education. All human societies, past and present, have had a vested interest in education; and some wits have claimed that teaching (at its best an educational activity) is the second oldest profession. While not all societies channel sufficient resources ...
The history of philosophy of education is an important source of concerns and issues—as is the history of education itself—for setting the intellectual agenda of contemporary philosophers of education. Equally relevant is the range of contemporary approaches to the subject. Although it is not possible here to review systematically either ...
The major teacher-centered philosophies of education are essentialism and perennialism. Student-centered philosophies are more focused on individual needs, contemporary relevance, and preparing students for a changing future. School is seen as an institution that works with youth to improve society or help students realize their individuality.
The paper presents my personal philosophy of education, how it has been put into real practice, and what results have been achieved throughout my career. Autoethnography-an approach to research by ...
The essay analyzes the author's personal philosophy of education as a student and an aspiring teacher. The author emphasizes the importance of gaining knowledge from education, even when faced with the challenges of a heavy workload and academic stress. They believe that completing the work and gaining knowledge is a privilege and that building ...
Personal Finance Discover personal finance tips and tricks around everything from managing your money to saving and planning for the future. Loans Explore the nuances of the different types of loans, including personal and student loans, and the potential pros and cons of co-signing a loan.
At the heart of the institute's academic efforts is the HAI Lab, housed at one of the world's most prestigious universities.Led by Philipp Koralus, an Oxford philosopher and one of the Institute's ...