Information
- Author Services
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Initiatives
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
- Active Journals
- Find a Journal
- Proceedings Series
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- For Editors
- For Librarians
- For Publishers
- For Societies
- For Conference Organizers
- Open Access Policy
- Institutional Open Access Program
- Special Issues Guidelines
- Editorial Process
- Research and Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charges
- Testimonials
- Preprints.org
- SciProfiles
- Encyclopedia
![Water water-logo](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/journals/water-logo.png?8600e93ff98dbf14)
Article Menu
- Subscribe SciFeed
- Google Scholar
- on Google Scholar
- Table of Contents
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
JSmol Viewer
Groundwater chemistry and quality in coastal aquifers.
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://www.mdpi.com/bundles/mdpisciprofileslink/img/unknown-user.png)
1. Introduction
2. advances on groundwater chemistry and quality in coastal areas, 2.1. groundwater chemistry and quality in coastal areas of china, 2.2. groundwater chemistry and quality in coastal areas of pakistan, 2.3. groundwater chemistry and quality in coastal areas of egypt, 3. conclusions, author contributions, conflicts of interest, list of contributions.
- Liu, R.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; Zhang, M. Occurrence of and Factors Affecting Groundwater Fluoride in the Western Coastal Area of Hainan Island, South China. Water 2023 , 15 , 3678. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15203678 .
- Liu, C.; Hou, Q.; Chen, Y.; Huang, G. Hydrogeochemical Characteristics and Groundwater Quality in a Coastal Urbanized Area, South China: Impact of Land Use. Water 2022 , 14 , 4131. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14244131 .
- Pei, L.; Lu, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Wu, H. Factors Controlling Natural Background Levels of Ammonium and Iodide in Shallow Groundwater of Coastal Aquifers, South China. Water 2022 , 14 , 3737. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223737 .
- Li, Z.; Li, J.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y.; Hao, Q. Anthropogenic Influences on the Hydrochemical Characteristics of the Groundwater in Xiamen City, China and Their Evolution. Water 2022 , 14 , 3377. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213377 .
- Chen, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Lv, J.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, H.; Yang, H.; Mei, S.; Jia, Z.; Zhang, H.; Jin, Y.; et al. Assessment of Groundwater Quality Using APCS-MLR Model: A Case Study in the Pilot Promoter Region of Yangtze River Delta Integration Demonstration Zone, China. Water 2023 , 15 , 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020225 .
- Qian, Y.; Hou, Q.; Wang, C.; Zhen, S.; Yue, C.; Cui, X.; Guo, C. Hydrogeochemical Characteristics and Groundwater Quality in Phreatic and Confined Aquifers of the Hebei Plain, China. Water 2023 , 15 , 3071. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15173071 .
- Qian, Y.; Zhen, S.; Yue, C.; Cui, X. Distribution and Origins of Hardness in Shallow and Deep Groundwaters of the Hebei Plain, China. Water 2024 , 16 , 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16020310 .
- Yuan, Z.; Jian, Y.; Chen, Z.; Jin, P.; Gao, S.; Wang, Q.; Ding, Z.; Wang, D.; Ma, Z. Distribution of Groundwater Hydrochemistry and Quality Assessment in Hutuo River Drinking Water Source Area of Shijiazhuang (North China Plain). Water 2024 , 16 , 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16010175 .
- Gao, M.; Li, X.; Qian, J.; Wang, Z.; Hou, X.; Fu, C.; Ma, J.; Zhang, C.; Li, J. Hydrogeochemical Characteristics and Evolution of Karst Groundwater in Heilongdong Spring Basin, Northern China. Water 2023 , 15 , 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040726 .
- Su, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, W.; Cheng, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, Z. Key Factors Dominating the Groundwater Chemical Composition in a Grain Production Base: A Case Study of Muling–Xingkai Plain, Northeast China. Water 2022 , 14 , 2222. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14142222 .
- Landar, A.Q.; Jahangir, T.M.; Khuhawar, M.Y.; Lanjwani, M.F.; Khuhawar, F.Y. Evaluation of Water Quality of Groundwater of Sanghar District, Sindh, Pakistan: Chemical and Multivariate Analysis. Water 2024 , 16 , 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16060856 .
- Hasan, S.S.; Salem, Z.E.; Sefelnasr, A. Assessment of Hydrogeochemical Characteristics and Seawater Intrusion in Coastal Aquifers by Integrating Statistical and Graphical Techniques: Quaternary Aquifer, West Nile Delta, Egypt. Water 2023 , 15 , 1803. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15101803 .
- Gleeson, T.; Befus, K.M.; Jasechko, S.; Luijendijk, E.; Cardenas, M.B. The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater. Nat. Geosci. 2016 , 9 , 161–167. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Mukherjee, A.; Scanlon, B.; Aureli, A.; Langan, S.; Guo, H.; McKenzie, A. Global Groundwater: Source, Scarcity, Sustainability, Security and Solutions , 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; p. xxv. [ Google Scholar ]
- Han, D.; Currell, M.J. Review of drivers and threats to coastal groundwater quality in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022 , 806 , 150913. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Small, C.; Nicholls, R.J. A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. J. Coast. Res. 2003 , 19 , 584–599. [ Google Scholar ]
- Zhang, F.; Huang, G.; Hou, Q.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q. Groundwater quality in the Pearl River Delta after the rapid expansion of industrialization and urbanization: Distributions, main impact indicators, and driving forces. J. Hydrol. 2019 , 577 , 124004. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Gleeson, T.; Wang-Erlandsson, L.; Porkka, M.; Zipper, S.C.; Jaramillo, F.; Gerten, D.; Fetzer, I.; Cornell, S.E.; Piemontese, L.; Gordon, L.J.; et al. Illuminating water cycle modifications and Earth system resilience in the Anthropocene. Water Resour. Res. 2020 , 56 , e2019WR024957. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lapworth, D.J.; Boving, T.B.; Kreamer, D.K.; Kebede, S.; Smedley, P.L. Groundwater quality: Global threats, opportunities and realising the potential of groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2022 , 811 , 152471. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Huang, G.; Liu, C.; Li, L.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Z. Spatial distribution and origin of shallow groundwater iodide in a rapidly urbanized delta: A case study of the Pearl River Delta. J. Hydrol. 2020 , 585 , 124860. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Huang, G.; Song, J.; Han, D.; Liu, R.; Liu, C.; Hou, Q. Assessing natural background levels of geogenic contaminants in groundwater of an urbanized delta through removal of groundwaters impacted by anthropogenic inputs: New insights into driving factors. Sci. Total Environ. 2023 , 857 , 159527. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Huang, G.; Zhang, M.; Liu, C.; Li, L.; Chen, Z. Heavy metal(loid)s and organic contaminants in groundwater in the Pearl River Delta that has undergone three decades of urbanization and industrialization: Distributions, sources, and driving forces. Sci. Total Environ. 2018 , 635 , 913–925. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Huang, G.; Pei, L.; Li, L.; Liu, C. Natural background levels in groundwater in the Pearl River Delta after the rapid expansion of urbanization: A new pre-selection method. Sci. Total Environ. 2022 , 813 , 151890. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Huang, G.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Liu, F. Impact of anthropogenic and natural processes on the evolution of groundwater chemistry in a rapidly urbanized coastal area, South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2013 , 463–464 , 209–221. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Huang, G.; Liu, C.; Sun, J.; Zhang, M.; Jing, J.; Li, L. A regional scale investigation on factors controlling the groundwater chemistry of various aquifers in a rapidly urbanized area: A case study of the Pearl River Delta. Sci. Total Environ. 2018 , 625 , 510–518. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Liu, R.; Xie, X.; Hou, Q.; Han, D.; Song, J.; Huang, G. Spatial distribution, sources, and human health risk assessment of elevated nitrate levels in groundwater of an agriculture-dominant coastal area in Hainan Island, China. J. Hydrol. 2024 , 634 , 131088. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Huang, G.; Han, D.; Song, J.; Li, L.; Pei, L. A sharp contrasting occurrence of iron-rich groundwater in the Pearl River Delta during the past dozen years (2006–2018): The genesis and mitigation effect. Sci. Total Environ. 2022 , 829 , 154676. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Huang, G.; Hou, Q.; Han, D.; Liu, R.; Song, J. Large scale occurrence of aluminium-rich shallow groundwater in the Pearl River Delta after the rapid urbanization: Co-effects of anthropogenic and geogenic factors. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2023 , 254 , 104130. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Huang, G.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z. Groundwater is important for the geochemical cycling of phosphorus in rapidly urbanized areas: A case study in the Pearl River Delta. Environ. Pollut. 2020 , 260 , 114079. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Hou, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, G.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y. Elevated manganese concentrations in shallow groundwater of various aquifers in a rapidly urbanized delta, south China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020 , 701 , 134777. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Zhang, M.; Huang, G.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J. Distributions and origins of nitrate, nitrite, and ammonium in various aquifers in an urbanized coastal area, south China. J. Hydrol. 2020 , 582 , 124528. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Click here to enlarge figure
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Share and Cite
Huang, G.; Li, L. Groundwater Chemistry and Quality in Coastal Aquifers. Water 2024 , 16 , 2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142041
Huang G, Li L. Groundwater Chemistry and Quality in Coastal Aquifers. Water . 2024; 16(14):2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142041
Huang, Guanxing, and Liangping Li. 2024. "Groundwater Chemistry and Quality in Coastal Aquifers" Water 16, no. 14: 2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142041
Article Metrics
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
![MDPI Open Access Journals MDPI](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/design/mdpi-pub-logo-white-small.png?71d18e5f805839ab?1721387811)
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Advertisement
Groundwater quality assessment using water quality index (WQI) under GIS framework
- Original Article
- Open access
- Published: 12 February 2021
- Volume 11 , article number 46 , ( 2021 )
Cite this article
You have full access to this open access article
- Arjun Ram 1 ,
- S. K. Tiwari 2 ,
- H. K. Pandey 3 ,
- Abhishek Kumar Chaurasia 1 ,
- Supriya Singh 4 &
- Y. V. Singh 5
59k Accesses
148 Citations
Explore all metrics
Groundwater is an important source for drinking water supply in hard rock terrain of Bundelkhand massif particularly in District Mahoba, Uttar Pradesh, India. An attempt has been made in this work to understand the suitability of groundwater for human consumption. The parameters like pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, alkalinity , total hardness, calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, sulfate, chloride, fluoride, nitrate, copper, manganese, silver, zinc, iron and nickel were analysed to estimate the groundwater quality. The water quality index (WQI) has been applied to categorize the water quality viz: excellent, good, poor, etc. which is quite useful to infer the quality of water to the people and policy makers in the concerned area. The WQI in the study area ranges from 4.75 to 115.93. The overall WQI in the study area indicates that the groundwater is safe and potable except few localized pockets in Charkhari and Jaitpur Blocks. The Hill-Piper Trilinear diagram reveals that the groundwater of the study area falls under Na + -Cl − , mixed Ca 2+ -Mg 2+ -Cl − and Ca 2+ - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) types. The granite-gneiss contains orthoclase feldspar and biotite minerals which after weathering yields bicarbonate and chloride rich groundwater. The correlation matrix has been created and analysed to observe their significant impetus on the assessment of groundwater quality. The current study suggests that the groundwater of the area under deteriorated water quality needs treatment before consumption and also to be protected from the perils of geogenic/anthropogenic contamination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Evaluation of Groundwater Quality for Drinking Purposes Using the WQI and EWQI in Semi-Arid Regions in India
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs44147-022-00138-9/MediaObjects/44147_2022_138_Fig1_HTML.png)
Water quality index for assessment of drinking groundwater purpose case study: area surrounding Ismailia Canal, Egypt
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40899-023-00998-w/MediaObjects/40899_2023_998_Fig1_HTML.png)
Groundwater quality evaluation using Water Quality Index (WQI) under GIS framework for Mandya City, Karnataka
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In India, there has been a tremendous increase in the demand for groundwater due to rapid growth of population, accelerated pace of industrialization and urbanization (Yisa and Jimoh 2010 ). The availability and quality of groundwater are badly affected at an alarming rate due to anthropogenic activities viz. overexploitation and improper waste disposal (industrial, domestic and agricultural) to groundwater reservoirs (Panda and Sinha 1991; Kavitha et al. 2019a , 2019b ). Consequently, human health is seriously threatened by the prevailing agricultural practices particularly in relation to excessive application of fertilizers; unsanitary conditions and disposal of sewage into groundwater (Panigrahi et al. 2012 ). The groundwater quality also varies with depth of water, seasonal changes, leached dissolved salts and sub-surface environment (Gebrehiwot et al. 2011 ). According to the World Health Organization (WHO 2017 ), about 80% of all the diseases in human beings are water-borne. Once the groundwater is contaminated, it is difficult to ensure its restoration and proper quality by preventing the pollutants from the source. It, therefore, becomes imperative to monitor the quality of groundwater regularly, and to device ways and means to protect it from contamination. The quality of groundwater is deciphered using various physical, chemical and biological characteristics of water (Diersing and Nancy 2009 ; Panneerselvam et al. 2020a ). It is a measure of health and hygiene of groundwater concerning the need and purpose of human consumption (Johnson et al. 1997 ; Panneerselvam et al. 2020b ).
In recent years, the assessment and monitoring of groundwater quality on a regular basis is being carried out using Geographic Information System (GIS) technique added with the IDW interpolation method and has proved itself as a powerful tool for evaluating and analysing spatial information of water resources (Aravindan et al. 2010 ; Shankar et al. 2010 , 2011a , b ; Venkateswaran et al. 2012 ; Selvam et al. 2013b; Magesh and Elango 2019 ; Balamurugan et al. 2020b ; Soujanya Kamble et al. 2020 ). It is an economically feasible and time-efficient technique for transforming huge data sets to generate various spatial distribution maps and projections revealing trends, associations and sources of contaminants/pollutants. In this work, GIS technique has been used for spatial evaluation of various groundwater quality parameters.
In this study, the physicochemical properties of forty-three groundwater samples collected from wells and hand pumps were determined and compared with international standards of WHO for drinking and domestic uses based on Water Quality Index (WQI). The WQI was first developed by Horton ( 1965 ) based on weighted arithmetical calculation. A number of researchers (Brown et al. 1972 ; GEMS UNEP 2007; Kavitha and Elangovan 2010 ; Alobaidy et al. 2010 ; Shankar and Kawo 2019 ; Bawoke and Anteneh 2020 developed various WQI models based on weighing and rating of different water quality parameters which is derived by the weighted arithmetic method. The WQI is a dimensionless number with values ranking between 0 and 100. The WQI is a unique digital rating expression that expresses overall water quality status viz. excellent, good, poor, etc. at a certain space and time based on various water quality parameters. Thus, the WQI is being used as an important tool to compare the quality of groundwater and their management (Jagadeeswari and Ramesh 2012 ) in a particular region; and is helpful for selecting appropriate economically feasible treatment process to cope up with the concerned quality issues. It depicts the composite impact of different water quality parameters and communicates water quality information to the public and legislative policy-makers to shape strong policy and implement the water quality programs (Kalavathy et al. 2011 ) by the government.
Mineral intractions strongly influence groundwater hydrochemistry in aquifers and disintegration of minerals from various source rocks (Cerar and Urbanc 2013 ; Modibo Sidibé et al. 2019 ). Hydrochemistry of the analysed samples indicates that the mean abundance of major cations is present in order of Na ++ > Ca 2+ > Mg 2+ > K + while major anions in order of \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) > \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) > Cl − > \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{2 - }\) > F − . The study shows that the sodium is dominant alkali while calcium and magnesium are the dominant alkaline earth metal leached in the aquafer due to rock water interaction affecting the quality of groundwater. Sodium in aquafer is derived from the weathering of halite and silicate minerals such as feldspar (Khan et al. 2014 ; Mostafa et al. 2017 ). The critical evaluation of Hill-Piper Trilinear diagram reflects Na + -Cl − , mixed Ca 2+ -Mg 2+ -Cl − , Ca 2+ - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) , mixed Ca 2+ -Na + - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) , Na + - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) and Ca 2+ -Cl − type hydro-chemical facies in decreasing order of dominance. The Hydro-chemical characterization of groundwater reveals that the nature of aquifer is controlled by type of water, source and level of contamination (Aghazadeh et al. 2017 ; Brhane 2018 ). Hence, in order to keep the health of any aquaculture system, particularly an aquifer system at an optimal level, certain water quality indicators or parameters must be regularly monitored and controlled. Therefore, the objective of the study is to calculate the WQI of groundwater in order to assess its suitability for human consumption using the GIS interpolation technique and statistical approach in the study area.
Mahoba district is the south-western district of Uttar Pradesh which is adjacent to the state of Madhya Pradesh in south and Hamirpur (UP) in the north. The study area falls under the survey of India (SOI) toposheets no. 54O and 63C lies between latitude N25°01′30″ to N25°39′40″ and longitude E79°15′00″ to E80°10′30″ and covers an area of approximately 2933.59 km 2 . River Dhasan separates the district Mahoba from Jhansi in the west. A certainpart of Jhansi and Banda district has been merged in newly constructed Mahoba district in 1995 (bifurcated from Hamirpur). Mahoba district consists of three tehsils Kulpahar, Charkhari, Mahoba and four blocks Panwari, Jaitpur, Charkhari, Kabrai (Fig. 1 a). Kabrai is the biggest block fromaerial coverage as well as population point of view. Jaitpur is the smallest block from aerial coverage and Charkhari from population point of view. The study area experiences a typical subtropical climate punctuated by long and intense summer, with distinct seasons. The area receives an average annual precipitation of 864 mm mainly from the south-west monsoon. The temperature of the coldest month (January) is 8.3°C while the temperature of the hottest month (May) shoots upto 47.5°C. The entire area under investigation is characterised by highly jointed/fractured Bundelkhand granite (Archean age) with thin soil cover. Physiographically , the area is characterised by Bundelkhand massif terrain and is marked by the occurrence of solitary or clustered hillocks and intervening low relief with undulating plains. Two major physiographic units are: (1) Southern part having high relief with hillocks- This is south of 20°25′ N latitude & maximum altitude is 340 mamsl, reserved forest. Granitoids and intervening pegmatitic veins and numbers of quartz veins are observed. (2) Northern part relatively low relief with lower hillocks- In between 25°25′N and 25°39′N latitude and maximum altitude is 310 mamsl. The area in and around Panwari is mainly covered with thick alluvium, and hard rock is encountered only below 35 mbgl, coverage with seasonal forest. Pedi plain, pediment inselberg and buried pediplains are present.
![research papers groundwater figure 1](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13201-021-01376-7/MediaObjects/13201_2021_1376_Fig1a_HTML.png)
a Study area map depicting the sampling sites. b Geological map of study area
Geological and hydrogeological set-up
The granite, particularly leucogranite, older and younger alluvium consisting of clay, silt, sand and gravel mainly comprises the study area. The geological set-up of the study area indicates that the most dominant lithology is leucogranite covering mainly central and eastern part while recent alluvium covers the northern part (Fig. 1 b). At places, few patches of pink granite have also been recorded which appears enclosed in leucogranite or adjacent to its outcrop.The occurrence of groundwater is highly uncertain and unpredictable in this hilly and rugged terrain as it does not allow percolation and storages underground. The presence of porosity depends on the intensity of weathering and rock fracture which is responsible for groundwater occurrence, its quantity and flow mostly in permeable zones of weathered rock formations and under secondary porosity in the deep fractured zone. Groundwater recharge in the study area is triggered by the depth of overburden 7 m (Jaitpur-Kulpahar area) to 35 m (parts of Mahoba Tahsil and Charkhari block) as well as the intensity of weathering.
Materials and methods
The groundwater samples were collected during pre-monsoon (June 2016) period from the study area according to standard procedures of the American Public Health Association (APHA, 2017). The sampling locations were marked with the help of global positioning system (GPS) as shown in the Fig. 1 a. Samples were collected from the location through hand pump (depth: approx. 40 m) and dug wells (depth: 8–30 m ) as shown in Fig. 2 a–t. The collecting bottles (High-Density Polythene, HDPE) of one-litre capacity each were sterilized under the aseptic condition to avoid unpredictable contamination and subsequent changes in the characteristics of groundwater. Water samples were filtered using Whatman 42 filter paper (pore size 2.5 μm) prior to collection in the bottle. The sample was kept in the ice-box (portable) and brought to NABL accredited (ISO 17,025: 2017) laboratory of Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), Lucknow and Department of Soil Science & Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP, India. The samples were stored in a chemical laboratory at temperature 4–5 °C. The samples for metallic parameters were added 2 ml elemental grade nitric acid to obtain the pH 2–3 after acidification. The samples were pre-filtered in the laboratory to carry out the analysis. In the present study, a total of 20 groundwater quality parameters of forty-three samples were analysed as per test standard methods (APHA 2017) in the laboratory except for unstable parameters viz. hydrogen ion concentration (pH), electrical conductivity (EC) and total dissolved solids (TDS) which are determined by portable device (pH-meter, EC-meter and TDS-meter) in situ. Alkalinity (AK), Total hardness (TH), calcium (Ca 2+ ), magnesium (Mg 2+ ), bicarbonate ( \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) ) and chloride (Cl − ) were analysed using volumetric titrations; sodium (Na + ) and potassium (K + ) were analysed using systronics flame photometer model 129; nitrate ( \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) ), fluoride (F − ), sulfate ( \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{2 - }\) ), were analysed using shimadzu 1800 spectrophotometer. Prior to analysis of the heavy metals viz. copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), silver (Ag), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe) and nickel (Ni); the groundwater samples were acidified with 1:1 nitric acid and concentrated ten times. The samples were subjected to analysis using Shimadzu 6701 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) on flame mode with hollow cathode lamps of metal under analysis. The concentration of metal is displayed on the monitor. The standards of the metallic parameters were prepared from National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) certified (Certified Reference Materials) CRM as per NABL guidelines of 17,025:2017.
![research papers groundwater figure 2](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13201-021-01376-7/MediaObjects/13201_2021_1376_Fig2a_HTML.png)
a – b Spatial distribution map of pH and EC. c – h Spatial distribution map of TDS, AK, TH, Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ and Na + . i – n : spatial distribution map of K + , \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) , \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{2 - }\) , Cl − , F − and \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) . o – t Spatial distribution map of Cu, Mn, Ag, Zn, Fe and Ni
The quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedure of the data has been considered during the study. Approximately half of the volume (500 ml) of samples were specially separated and checked in the laboratory to ensure QA/QC mechanisms. The accuracy of the chemical analysis has been validated by charge balance errors and samples < 5% error were considered.
The inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation technique used in this study is now-adays an effective tool for spatial interpolation of groundwater quality parameters leading to the generation of spatial distribution maps (Magesh et al. 2013 ; Kawo and Shankar 2018 ; Balamurugan et al. 2020b ; Sarfo and Shankar 2020 ). The weights were assigned to various parameters at each location based on distance and were calculated, taking into consideration the closest specified locations. The distribution of each groundwater quality parameter has been demarcated in different zones on spatial distribution map viz. acceptable/desirable and permissible limits according to BIS (2012, 2015) and WHO ( 2017 ) for drinking purpose. The statistical analysis and correlation matrix of the analysed groundwater quality parameters have been laid down as shown in Tables 1 and 2 , respectively.
The water quality index (WQI)
The WQI has been determined using the drinking water quality standard recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO 2017 ). The Water Quality Index has been calculated using the weighted arithmetic method, which was originally proposed by Horton ( 1965 ) and developed by Brown et al. ( 1972 ). The weighted arithmetic water quality index (WQI) is represented in the following way:
where n = number of variables or parameters, W i = unit weight for the i th parameter, Q i = quality rating (sub-index) of the i th water quality parameter.
The unit weight ( W i ) of the various water quality parameters are inversely proportional to the recommended standards for the corresponding parameters.
where, W i = unit weight for the i th parameter, S n = standard value for i th parameters, K = proportional constant,
The value of K has been considered ‘1′ here and is calculated using the mentioned equation below:
According to Brown et al. ( 1972 ), the value of quality rating or sub-index ( Q i ) is calculated using the equation as given below:
where V o = observed value of i th parameter at a given sampling site, V i = ideal value of i th parameter in pure water, S n = standard permissible value of i th parameter.
All the ideal values (V i ) are taken as zero for drinking water except pH and dissolved oxygen (Tripathy and Sahu 2005 ). In case of pH, the ideal value is 7.0 (for natural/pure water) while the permissible value is 8.5 (for polluted water). Similarly, for dissolved oxygen, the ideal value is 14.6 mg/L while the standard permissible value for drinking water is 5 mg/L. Therefore, the quality rating for pH and Dissolved Oxygen are calculated from the equations respectively as shown below:
where, V pH = observed value of pH, V do = observed value of dissolved oxygen.
If, Q i = 0 implies complete absence of contaminants while 0 < Q i < 100 implies that, the contaminants are within the prescribed standard. When Q i > 100 implies that, the contaminants are above the standards.
The classification of water quality, based on its water quality index (WQI) after Brown et al. ( 1972 ); Chatterjee and Raziuddin ( 2002 ) and Shankar and Kawo ( 2019 ) have been considered here in this study for further reference which is mentioned in Table 3 .
Result and discussion
Groundwater quality parameters.
In this study based on the selected parameters as discussed above the groundwater quality maps have been prepared with the help of ArcGIS software 10.1 as shown in Fig. 2 a–t. In the following lines, the various parameters considered in the study are being discussed: The Bureau of Indian Standard (BIS 2012, 2015) and World Health Organization (WHO 2017 ) of drinking water standards have been considered as a reference in this study.
Hydrogen ion concentration (pH)
It is an important indicator for assessing the quality and pollution of any aquifer system as it is closely related to other chemical constituents of water. The presence of hydrogen ion concentration is measured in terms of pH range. Water, in its pure form shows a neutral pH which indicates hydrogen ion concentration. In the present study, the range of pH varies between 6.81 (minimum) to 8.32 (maximum) which is within the acceptable limit (6.5–8.5, avg: 7.81) indicating the alkaline nature of groundwater (ideal range of pH for human consumption: 6.5–8.5).
Electrical conductivity (EC)
In fact, it is a measure of the ability of any substance or solution to conduct electrical current through the water. EC is directly proportional to the dissolved material in a water sample. The desirable limit of EC for drinking purpose is 750 µS/cm. In this study, the electrical conductivity varies between 286 and 1162 µS/cm. High EC at some sites suggests the mixing of sewage in groundwater as these sites are near dense urbanization.
Total dissolved solids (TDS)
The weight of residue expresses it after a water sample is evaporated to dry state. It includes calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, carbonate, bicarbonate, chloride and sulfate. In the present study, it ranges between 280 to 879 mg/l (< 500 mg/l TDS for potable water as per BIS.). The agricultural practices, residential runoff, leaching of soil causing contamination and point source water pollution discharge from industrial or sewage treatment plants are the primary sources for TDS (Boyd 2000 ).
Alkalinity (AK)
It is a measure of the carbonate, bicarbonate and hydroxide ions present in water. The desirable limit of alkalinity in potable water is 200 mg/l, above which the taste of water becomes unpleasant. In the study area, the alkalinity ranges between 50 to 452 mg/l, which is within the permissible limit (600 mg/l).
Total hardness (TH)
It is the amount of dissolved calcium and magnesium in the water. Water moving through soil and rock dissolves naturally occurring minerals and carries them into the groundwater as it is a great solvent for calcium and magnesium. In this study, hardness ranges between 70 to 592 mg/l, which is within the permissible limits (600 mg/l). The high concentration of TH in groundwater may cause heart disease and kidney stone in human beings.
Calcium (Ca 2+ )
It enters into the aquifer system from the leaching of calcium bearing minerals. In the study area, the calcium concentration ranges from 12 to 112 mg/l and is within the permissible limit (200 mg/l). The lesser concentration of Ca 2+ in the groundwater satisfies the chemical weathering and dissolution of fluorite, consequently resulting in an increase of fluoride concentration.
Magnesium (Mg 2+ )
It is an important parameter responsible for the hardness of the water. In the study area, the concentration ranges between 2.4 to 120 mg/l and is present in little excess of the permissible limit (100 mg/l).
Sodium (Na + )
It is a highly reactive alkali metal. It is present in most of the groundwater. Many rocks and soils contain sodium compounds, which easily dissolves to liberate sodium in groundwater. In the study area, it ranges from 48.71 to 244.4 mg/l. The high concentration of Na + indicates weathering of rock-forming minerals i.e., silicate minerals (alkali feldspars) and/or dissolution of soil salts present therein due to evaporation (Stallard and Edmond 1983 ). In the aquifers, the high Na + concentration in groundwater may be related to the mechanism of cation exchange (Kangjoo Kim and Seong-Taekyun 2005).
Potassium (K + )
It is present in many minerals and most of the rocks. Many of these rocks are relatively soluble and releases potassium, the concentration of which increases with time in groundwater. In this study, it varies between 0.87 to 2.7 mg/l.
Bicarbonate ( \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) )
It is produced by the reaction of carbon dioxide with water on carbonate rocks viz. limestone and dolomite. The carbon-dioxide present in the soil reacts with the rock-forming minerals is responsible for the presence of bicarbonate, producing an alkaline environment in the groundwater. In the study area it varies between 36.61 to 536.95 mg/l and is within the permissible limit of 600 mg/l.
Sulfate ( \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{2 - }\) )
It is dissolved and leached from rocks containing gypsum, iron sulfides, and other sulfur bearing compounds. In the present study, it ranges between the 2.23 to 75.17 mg/l, which is well within the acceptable limit of 200 mg/l.
Chloride (Cl − )
In the present study the Cl − ranges between 70.92 to 276.59 mg/l which exceed the permissible limit (250 mg/l). The higher value of chlorine in groundwater makes it hazardous to human health (Pius et al. 2012 ; Sadat-Noori et al. 2014 ).
Fluoride (F − )
In groundwater fluoride is geogenic in nature. It is the lightest halogen, and one of the most reactive elements (Kaminsky et al. 1990 ). It usually occurs either in trace amounts or as a major ion with high concentration (Gaciri and Davies 1993 ; Apambire et al. 1997 ; Fantong et al. 2010 ). The groundwater contains fluorides released from various fluoride-bearing minerals mainly as a result of groundwater-host rock interaction. The study area comprising granite, granitic gneiss etc. is commonly found to contain fluorite (CaF 2 ) as an accessory mineral (Ozsvath 2006 ; Saxena and Ahmed 2003 ) which plays a significant role in controlling the geochemistry of fluoride (Deshmukh et al. 1995 ). In addition to fluorite it is also abundant in other rock-forming minerals like apatite, micas, amphiboles, and clay minerals (Karro and Uppin 2013 ; Narsimha and Sudarshan 2013 ; Naseem et al. 2010 ; Jha et al. 2010 ; Rafique et al. 2009 ; Carrillo-Rivera et al. 2002 ). In the present study, the fluoride concentration ranges from 0.11 to 3.91 mg/l. The concentration of fluoride exceeds the permissible limit (1.5 mg/l) in about 25% of the groundwater samples.
Nitrate ( \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) )
Nitrate is naturally occurring ions and is a significant component in the nitrogen cycle. However, nitrate ion in groundwater is undesirable as it causes Methaemoglobinaemia in infants less than 6 months of age (Egereonu and Nwachukwu 2005 ). In general, its higher concentration causes health hazards if present beyond the permissible limit, 45 mg/l (Kumar et al. 2012 , 2014 ). In the study area, its concentration ranges from 86.95 to 210.4 mg/l. It is in excess of the permissible limits throughout the study area. The higher values of nitrate in potable water increases the chances of gastric ulcer/cancer, and other health hazards to infants and pregnant women (Rao 2006 ) also birth malformations and hypertension (Majumdar and Gupta 2000 ). The area under study is granite-gneiss terrain where the atmospheric nitrogen is fixed and added to the soil as ammonia through lightning storms, bacteria present in soil and root of plants. Further, animal wastes, plants and animals remain also undergo ammonification in the soil producing ammonia which undergoes nitrification/ammonia oxidation by Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter bacteria to form nitrate (Rivett et al. 2008 ; Galloway et al. 2004). Granitic rocks contain nitrogen concentrations up to 250 mg Nkg −1 with ammonium partitioned into the orthoclase feldspar to a greater extent than muscovite or biotite (Boyd et al. 1993 ). Geologic nitrogen (nitrogen contained in bedrock) contribute to the ecosystem with nitrogen saturation (more nitrogen available than required by biota) leading to leaching of nitrogen and consequently elevating nitrate concentrations in groundwater (Dahlgren 1994 ; Holloway et al. 1998 ). Nitrogen released through weathering has a greater impact on soil and water quality. Also, denitrification is significant in modifying the level to which nitrogen released through weathering of bedrock influencing the supply of nitrate in groundwater (McCray et al. 2005 ).
Copper (Cu)
It is a naturally occurring metal in rock, soil, plants, animals, and groundwater in very less concentration. The concentration of Cu may get enriched into the groundwater through quarrying and mining activities, farming practices, manufacturing operations and municipal or industrial waste released. Cu gets into drinking water either by contaminating of well water or corrosion of copper pipes in case of water is acidic. In this study, it ranges between 0 and 0.0078 mg/l, which is within the permissible limit (0.05 mg/l).
Manganese (Mn)
It occurs naturally in groundwater, especially in an anaerobic environment. The concentrations of Mn in groundwater is dependent upon rainfall chemistry, aquifer lithology, geochemical environment, groundwater flow paths and residence time, etc. which may vary significantly in space and time. It may be released by the leaching of the overlying soils and minerals in underlying rocks as well as from the minerals of the aquifer itself in groundwater. In the present study, manganese ranges between 0.005 and 0.221 mg/l, which is within the permissible limit (0.3 mg/l).
It naturally occurs usually in the form of insoluble and immobile oxides, sulfides and some salts. It is rarely present in groundwater, surface water and drinking water at concentrations above 5 µg/litre (WHO 2017 ). In the present study, the silver ranges between 0.000 and 0.021 mg/l, which is within the permissible limit (0.1 mg/l).
Though it occurs in significant quantities in rocks, groundwater seldom contains zinc above 0.1 mg/l. In the present study, the groundwater shows the negligible concentration of Zn (0.0136 mg/l) which is well within the acceptable limit (5 mg/l).
The most common sources of iron in groundwater is weathering of iron-bearing minerals and rocks. The iron occurs naturally in the reduced Fe 2+ state in the aquifer, but its dissolution increases its concentration in groundwater. Iron in this state is soluble and generally does not create any health hazard. If Fe 2+ state is oxidised to Fe 3+ state in contact with atmospheric oxygen or by the action of iron-related bacteria which forms insoluble hydroxides in groundwater. So, the concentration of iron in groundwater is often higher than those measured in surface water. In the present study, the iron ranges between 0.0994 and 0.4018 mg/l, which is within of the permissible limit 1.0 mg/l (BIS 2015).
Nickel (Ni)
The primary source of nickel in groundwater is from the dissolution of nickel ore bearing rocks. The source of nickel in drinking water is leaching from metals in contact such as water supply pipes and fittings. Ni usually occurs in the divalent state, but oxidation states of + 1, + 3, or + 4 may also exist in nature. In the study area, it ranges between 0 and 0.0408 mg/l, and it crosses the permissible limit (0.02 mg/l).
Statistical analysis, correlation matrix and relative weightage
The relative weightage, general statistical analysis and correlation matrix of groundwater quality parameters are tabulated in Tables 4 , 1 and 2 , respectively. The correlation matrix of various 20 groundwater quality parameters, including 6 heavy metals was created and has been analysed using MS Excel 2016 Table 2 . Out of these, eight parameters viz. TDS, EC, Na + , Alkalinity, TH, Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) are significantly correlated, reflecting more than 0.50 correlation value. Further, TDS vs EC, Na + vs Alkalinity, TH as CaCO 3 − vs Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ , \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) vs Alkalinity and Na + indicates most relevant correlation having a significant impetus on the overall assessment of the quality of groundwater than any other major radicals and physical parameters. However, the majority of quality parameters are positively correlated with each other. A critical analysis of the correlation matrix for the heavy metals indicates that Cu is positively correlated with EC, TDS, Na + , K + , Cl − and \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) . Similarly, Mn is positively correlated with pH, EC, TDS and Cu. While, Ag is positively correlated with pH, Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , K + , TH, Cl − , \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) and Mn. Further, Fe is positively correlated with TDS, Mg 2+ , Na + , TH, \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) , \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{2 - }\) , \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) , Cu and Ag. Similarly, Ni is positively correlated with pH, EC, TDS, Ca 2+ , K + , \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) and Mn.
The higher concentration of Ni, Fe and Mn may trigger the presence of other heavy metals viz. Pb, Cd and Cr which are very sensitive and significant heavy metal and needs to be observed carefully in future for groundwater quality in the study area. The presence of Fe, \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{2 - }\) and \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) may trigger the presence of Cd (Chaurasia et al. 2018 ).
Spatial distribution pattern
The spatial distribution pattern of the contour maps of the groundwater quality parameters have been generated as represented in Fig. 2 a–t. The spatial distribution pattern of the pH indicates that the central part along NW–SE across the district with some scattered small patches throughout indicating the presence of alkaline groundwater (Fig. 2 a). In acidic water, fluoride is adsorbed on a clay surface, while in alkaline water, fluoride is desorbed from solid phases; therefore, alkaline pH is more favourable for fluoride dissolution, (Keshavarzi et al. 2010 ; Rafique et al. 2009 ; Saxena and Ahmed 2003 ; Rao 2009 ; Ravindra and Garg 2007 ; Vikas et al. 2009 ). The southern portion of the district in Kabrai Block is having high TDS (> 750 mg/l) in groundwater (Fig. 2 c) due to poor fluxing and highly weathered rock formations. Similarly, EC is mainly highest (> 900 mg/l) in the southern part with small scattered patches in central and NE part of the district (Fig. 2 b). This is in consonance with the higher TDS (significant positive correlation with EC) as evidenced by the correlation matrix of the quality parameters (Table 2 ). The alkalinity map clearly and significantly indicates that it is highest in the central part surrounded by gradually decreasing alkalinity outwards (Fig. 2 d). The bicarbonates trigger the alkalinity in groundwater (Adams et al. 2001 ). The quality of groundwater in a major portion of the study area is alkaline in nature, indicating that the dissolved carbonates are predominantly in the form of bicarbonates. A positive correlation is observed between the alkalinity of groundwater and fluoride (Table 2 ), consequently releasing fluoride in the groundwater. The spatial distribution map of Ca 2+ suggests varying concentration within permissible limit throughout the study area (Fig. 2 f) due to the presence of alkali feldspar in granite. Similarly, Mg 2+ is also distributed unevenly but falls within permissible limit with an exception in NE part of the district (Fig. 2 g). The spatial distribution pattern of TH reflects that the study area is characterized by moderately hard groundwater.
Figure 2 e The Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ions present in the groundwater are possibly derived from leaching of calcium and magnesium bearing rock-formations in the study area. The fluoride in groundwater shows a negative correlation with Ca 2+ , indicating the high value of fluoride in groundwater in association with low Ca 2+ content. The correlation matrix clearly marks a significant positive correlation among Na + , alkalinity and TDS, which is being reflected from their respective spatial distribution maps (Fig. 2 c, d and h). Na + is highest in the central part (with small patches in the eastern part and insignificantly in the western part) which is in conformity with the alkalinity and TDS spatial distribution patterns. Although, the presence of K + is insignificant and its lower concentration within the permissible limit is covering a major portion of the district due to poor weathering of orthoclase. Its distribution pattern indicates conformity more or less with the TDS and Na + (Fig. 2 c, h, and i). \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) is an important quality parameter showing significant positive correlation (> 0.50) with alkalinity and Na + (Table 2 ) which is also reflected in the spatial distribution pattern of these parameters (Fig. 2 d, h, j). Although sulphate ( \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{2 - }\) ) is an important quality parameter. It is present within the permissible limit in the study.
area (Fig. 2 k). Chloride is slightly in excess in a larger patch, particularly in SE-part of the study area which may cause a health hazard. It is revealed from the spatial distribution map of chloride (Fig. 2 l). This is due to poor fluxing and presence of halite mineral. Fluoride (F − ) is an important quality parameter, especially with respect to the study area where it is present noticeably in scattered patches throughout the district. It is observed that mainly in NE part, the central part and SE part of the district the concentration of fluoride is in excess (2.82 mg/l to 3.91 mg/l) of permissible limit 1.5 mg/l (Fig. 2 m). The higher concentration (> 3.0 mg/l) of fluoride may lead to skeletal fluorosis (Raju et al 2009 ). Several factors viz. temperature, pH, presence or absence of complexing or precipitating ions and colloids, the solubility of fluorine bearing minerals (biotite and apatite), anion exchange capacity of the aquifer (OH − with F − ), size and type of geological formations traversed by groundwater and the contact time during which water remains in contact with the formation are responsible for fluoride concentration in groundwater (Apambire et al. 1997 ). The lithology of fractured rock reveals that it contains more fluoride bearing minerals than massive rocks (Pandey et al. 2016 ). Nitrate (NO 3 − ) in groundwater is mainly anthropogenic in nature which could be due to leaching from waste disposal, sanitary landfills, over-application of inorganic nitrate fertilizer or improper manure management practice (Chapman 1996 ). In this study, it is observed that nitrate is in excess of the permissible limits with varying degree of concentration throughout the district, causing health hazard (Fig. 2 n). The area under study is granite-gneiss terrain where the atmospheric nitrogen is fixed and added to the soil as ammonia through lightning storms, bacteria present in soil and plants roots. Further, animal wastes, plants and animals remain also undergo ammonification in the soil producing ammonia which undergoes nitrification. The high values of nitrate in groundwater samples in the area may be due to unlined septic tanks and unplanned sewerage system that contaminates to the phreatic aquifer (Hei et al. 2020 ). Proper monitoring and concerned regulated effort are consistently required to get the assessment of nitrate impact on human health.
As far as heavy metals concentration in groundwater is concerned, Cu does not mark its noticeable presence (Fig. 2 o). Another, naturally occurring quality parameter is Mn which shows its presence within the permissible limit (Fig. 2 p). Silver and Zinc do not show any remarkable presence in the study area (Fig. 2 q and r). The study reveals a higher concentration of iron in groundwater in the Eastern part of the district due to secondary porosity and where ferrous (Fe 2+ ) ion usually occurs below the water table. The Fe 2+ after converting into Ferric (Fe 3+ ) state, becomes harmful and precipitated. This condition can be avoided naturally by raising the water table through groundwater recharging the affected area (Fig. 2 s). Nickel shows its remarkable presence in smaller patches in different areas (Fig. 2 t) due to the presence of heavy minerals like rutile and apatite.
Water quality index
The water quality index (WQI) map has been prepared using ArcGIS 10.1 on the basis of the selectively chosen quality parameters to decipher the various quality classes viz. excellent, good, poor, very poor and unsuitable at each hydro-station for drinking purpose (Tables 3 and 5 ; Fig. 3 ). The WQI Map of the study area indicates that major portion is having excellent (0–25) quality of groundwater while very poor (75–100) to unsuitable (> 100) quality is prevailing in small pockets in SW part (Fig. 3 ). The map clearly indicates that the quality of groundwater in Panwari Block belongs to excellent to good categories as for as potability for human consumption is concerned.
![research papers groundwater figure 3](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13201-021-01376-7/MediaObjects/13201_2021_1376_Fig3_HTML.png)
Water quality index map of the study area, District Mahoba
There is gradual variation in groundwater quality from very poor to excellent at the central part and outwards in the Charkhari Block. There is no noticeable change in the quality of groundwater except in the SW part of the Kabari Block. In the Jaitpur block, there is a significant.
variation in the quality class and the SW part (Nanwara, Ajnar and Khama) is characterized by poor, very poor and unsuitable categories (Fig. 3 ). Remaining part of the block falls under good to excellent groundwater quality. Overall, the quality of groundwater belongs to the excellent category in a major portion of the study area and is suitable for drinking as well as domestic uses.
Hydro-chemical facies
The major ions analysed are unevenly distributed and have been plotted on a Hill-Piper Trilinear diagram (Fig. 4 ). This diagram is comprised of two triangles at the base and one diamond shape at the top to represent the major significant cations and anions responsible for the nature of groundwater (Balamurugan et al. 2020a ). The piper diagram is used to categorize groundwater into various six types such as Ca 2+ - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) type, Na + -Cl − type, mixed Ca 2+ -Mg 2+ -Cl − type, Ca 2+ -Na + - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) type, Na + - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) type and Ca 2+ -Cl − type. A critical evaluation of the diagram reflects that 32.56% of the samples fall under Na + -Cl − type, 30.23% of the samples under mixed Ca 2+ -Mg 2+ -Cl − type, 16.28% of the samples under Ca 2+ - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) type, 13.95% of the samples under mixed Ca 2+ -Na + - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) type, 4.65% of the samples under Na + - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) type and 2.33% of the samples under Ca 2+ -Cl − type. Further, the observation reveals that the samples are distributed mainly into Na + -Cl − type, mixed Ca 2+ -Mg 2+ -Cl − type and Ca 2+ - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) type reflecting higher concentration of sodium and calcium bearing salt/mineral. Hydrochemistry of the analysed samples indicate that the major cations are present in order Na + > Ca 2+ > Mg 2+ > K + of mean abundance while anions are present in the mean abundance order of \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) > \({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) > Cl − > \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{2 - }\) > F − (Table 1 ). This reveals that sodium, chloride and bicarbonate dominate the ionic concentration in the groundwater due to action of weathering of minerals like halite and dolomite as well as ion exchange process.
![research papers groundwater figure 4](https://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13201-021-01376-7/MediaObjects/13201_2021_1376_Fig4_HTML.png)
Types of groundwater
The outcome of the present research in the hard rock area of the Bundelkhand region of India reveals that the groundwater has been deteriorated due to both geogenic and anthropogenic activities.
The study area is comprised mainly of granite and alkali granite, specifically in extreme southern which is responsible for leaching of fluoride in groundwater.
The thickness of overburden (loose soil and weathered rock) in the northern part of the study area is negligible. Therefore, there is a poor fluxing of groundwater which in turn triggers the concentration of TDS, fluoride and bicarbonate in groundwater.
Anthropogenic activities like unlined septic tanks and unplanned sewerage system have triggered the nitrate concentration in groundwater, particularly in the central and northern part of the study area. The rest of the area is safe and has potable groundwater. In addition, the area under study is granite-gneiss terrain where the atmospheric nitrogen is fixed and added to the soil as ammonia through natural lightning, bacteria present in soil and plants roots. Further, ammonification of animal wastes, plants and animal remains produces ammonia which undergoes nitrification.
Hydro-chemical facies reveal that the nature of groundwater is Na + -Cl − , mixed Ca 2+ -Mg 2+ -Cl − and Ca 2+ - \({\text{HCO}}_{3}^{ - }\) type in the study area.
The high value of WQI has been found, which is due to the higher values of chloride, fluoride, nitrate, manganese, iron, and nickel in the groundwater, which warrants immediate attention.
On the basis of WOI, it is concluded that the groundwater is safe and potable in the study area except for localized pockets in Jaitpur and Charkhari Blocks.
Adams S, Titus R, Pietersen K, Tredoux G, Harris C (2001) Hydrochemical characteristics of aquifers near Sutherland in the Western Karoo, South Africa. J Hydrol 241:91–103
Article Google Scholar
Aghazadeh N, Chitsazan M, Golestan Y (2017) Hydrochemistry and quality assessment of groundwater in the Ardabil area. Iran Appl Water Sci 7:3599–3616
Alobaidy AM, Abid HS, Maulood BK (2010) Application of water quality index for assessment of Dokan lake ecosystem, Kurdistan region, Iraqi. J Water Res Prot 2:792–798
Apambire WB, Boyle DR, Michel FA (1997) Geochemistry, genesis, and health implications of fluoriferous groundwater in the upper regions of Ghana. Environ Geol 33:13–22
APHA, AWWA, WEF (2017) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 23th edition., APHA, Washington, DC. v.6.
Aravindan S, Shankar K, Ganesh BP, Rajan KD (2010) Hydrogeochemical mapping of in the hard rock area of Gadilam River basin, using GIS technique. Tamil Nadu Indian J Appl Geochem 12(2):209–216
Google Scholar
Balamurugan P, Kumar PS, Shankar K (2020a) Dataset on the suitability of groundwater for drinking and irrigation purposes in the Sarabanga River region, Tamil Nadu, India. Data in Brief 29:105255
Balamurugan P, Kumar PS, Shankar K, Nagavinothini R, Vijayasurya K (2020b) Non-carcinogenic risk assessment of groundwater in Southern Part of Salem District in Tamilnadu, India. J Chil Chem Soc 65:4697–4707
Bawoke GT, Anteneh ZL (2020) Spatial assessment and appraisal of groundwater suitability for drinking consumption in Andasa watershed using water quality index (WQI) and GIS techniques: Blue Nile Basin. Northwestern Ethiopia Cogent Eng 7(1):1748950
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard) (2012) Indian standard drinking water specification, second revision, pp.1–16.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standard) (2015) Indian standard drinking water specification. second revision, pp.2–6.
Boyd CE (2000) Water Quality an Introduction. Kluwer Acadamic Publi-shers, Boston, USA, p 330
Boyd SR, Hall A, Pillinger CT (1993) The measurement of d15N in crustal rocks by static vacuum mass spectrometry: Application to the origin of the ammonium in the Cornubian batholith, southwest England. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 57:1339–1347
Brhane GK (2018) Characterization of hydro chemistry and groundwater quality evaluation for drinking purpose in Adigrat area, Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Water Sci 32:213–229
Brown RM, Mccleiland NJ, Deiniger RA, O’Connor MF (1972) Water quality index-crossing the physical barrier. Res Jerusalem 6:787–797
Carrillo-Rivera JJ, Cardona A, Edmunds WM (2002) Use of abstraction regime and knowledge of hydrogeological conditions to control high-fluoride concentration in abstracted groundwater: San Luis Potosı basin, Mexico. J Hydrol 261:24–47
Cerar S, Urbanc J (2013) Carbonate chemistry and isotope characteristics of groundwater of Ljubljansko polje and Ljubljansko Barje aquifers in Slovenia. Sci World J 2013:1–11
Chapman D (1996) Water Quality Assessment-A guide to use of biota, sediments and water environmental monitoring 2nd Edition EPFN Spon. London. p.626.
Chatterjee C, Raziuddin M (2002) Determination of Water Quality Index (WQI) of a degraded river in Asansol industrial area (West Bengal). Nat Environ Pollut Technol 1:181–189
Chaurasia AK, Pandey HK, Tiwari SK, Prakash R, Pandey P, Ram A (2018) Groundwater quality assessment using water quality index (WQI) in parts of Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh, India. J Geol Soc India 92:76–82
Dahlgren RA (1994) Soil acidification and nitrogen saturation from weathering of ammonium-bearing rock. Nature 368:838–841
Deshmukh AN, Shah KC, Sriram A (1995) Coal Ash: a source of fluoride pollution, a case study of Koradi thermal power station, District Nagpur. Maharashtra Gondwana Geol Mag 9:21–29
Diersing N, Nancy F (2009) Water quality: Frequently asked questions. Florida Brooks National Marine Sanctuary, Key West, FL
Egereonu UU, Nwachukwu UL (2005) Evaluation of the surface and groundwater resources of Efuru River Catchment, Mbano, South Eastern. Nigeria J Assoc Adv Model Simulat Tech Enterpr 66:53–71
Fantong WY, Satake H, Ayonghe SN, Suh EC, Adelana SM, Fantong EBS, Zhang J (2010) Geochemical provenance and spatial distribution of fluoride in groundwater of Mayo Tsanaga River Basin, Far North Region, Cameroon: implications for incidence of fluorosis and optimal consumption dose. Environ Geochem Health 32:147–163
Gaciri SJ, Davies TC (1993) The occurrence and geochemistry of fluoride in some natural waters of Kenya. J Hydrol 143:395–412
Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Seitzinger SP, Asner GP, Cleveland CC, Green PA, Holland EA, Karl DM (2004) Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry 70:153–226
Gebrehiwot AB, Tadesse N, Jigar E (2011) Application of water quality index to assess suitablity of groundwater quality for drinking purposes in Hantebet watershed, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. ISABB J Food Agric Sci 1:22–30
GEMS U (2007) Global drinking water quality index development and sensitivity analysis report. United Nations Environment Programme Global Environment Monitoring System/Water Programme. p.58.
Hei L, Bouchaou L, Tadoumant S, Reichert B (2020) Index-based groundwater vulnerability and water quality assessment in the arid region of Tata city (Morocco). Groundw Sustain Dev:100344
Holloway JM, Dahlgren RA, Hansen B, Casey WH (1998) Contribution of bedrock nitrogen to high nitrate concentrations in stream water. Nature 395:785–788
Horton RK (1965) An index number system for rating water quality. J Water Pollut Control Federation 373:303–306
Jagadeeswari PB, Ramesh K (2012) Deciphering fresh and saline groundwater interface in south Chennai coastal aquifer, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Res Chem Environ 2:123–132
Jha SK, Nayak AK, Sharma YK (2010) Potential fluoride contamination in the drinking water of Marks Nagar, Unnao district, UP, India. Environ Geochem Health 32:217–226
Johnson DL, Ambrose SH, Bassett TJ, Bowen ML, Crummey DE, Isaacson JS, Winter-Nelson AE (1997) Meanings of environmental terms. J Environ Qual 26:581–589
Kalavathy S, Sharma TR, Suresh KP (2011) Water quality index of river Cauvery in Tiruchirappalli district, Tamilnadu. Arch Environ Sci 5:55–61
Kaminsky LS, Mahoney MC, Leach J, Melius J, Jo Miller M (1990) Fluoride: benefits and risks of exposure. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1:261–281
Kangjoo K, Yun ST (2005) Buffering of sodium concentration by cation exchange in the groundwater system of a sandy aquifer. Geochem J 39:273–284
Karro E, Uppin M (2013) The occurrence and hydrochemistry of fluoride and boron in carbonate aquifer system, central and western Estonia. Environ Monit Assess 185:3735–3748
Kavitha MT, Divahar R, Meenambal T, Shankar K, VijaySingh R, Haile TD, Gadafa C (2019a) Dataset on the assessment of water quality of surface water in Kalingarayan Canal for heavy metal pollution, Tamil Nadu. Data in Brief 22:878–884
Kavitha MT, Shankar K, Divahar R, Meenambal T, Saravanan R (2019b) Impact of industrial wastewater disposal on surface water bodies in Kalingarayan canal, Erode district, Tamil Nadu, India. Arch Agric Environ Sci 4(4):379–387
Kavitha R, Elangovan K (2010) Ground water quality characteristics at Erode district, Tamilnadu India. Int J Environ Sci 1:163–175
Kawo NS, Shankar K (2018) Groundwater quality assessment using water quality index and GIS technique in Modjo River Basin, Central Ethiopia. J Afr Earth Sci 147:300–311
Keshavarzi B, Moore F, Esmaeili A, Rastmanesh F (2010) The source of fluoride toxicity in Muteh area, Isfahan. Iran Environ Earth Sci 61:777–786
Khan D, Hagras MA, Iqbal N (2014) Groundwater quality evaluation in Thal Doab of Indus Basin of Pakistan. Int J Modern Eng Res 4:36–47
Kumar SK, Chandrasekar N, Seralathan P, Godson PS, Magesh NS (2012) Hydrogeochemical study of shallow carbonate aquifers, Rameswaram Island, India. Environ Monit Assess 184:4127–4138
Kumar SK, Logeshkumaran A, Magesh NS, Godson PS, Chandrasekar N (2014) Hydro-geochemistry and application of water quality index (WQI) for groundwater quality assessment, Anna Nagar, part of Chennai City, Tamil Nadu, India. Appl Water Sci 5:335–343
Magesh NS, Elango L (2019) Spatio-temporal variations of fluoride in the groundwater of Dindigul District, Tamil Nadu, India: a comparative assessment using two interpolation techniques. GIS Geostat Techn Groundwater Sci:283–296.
Magesh NS, Krishnakumar S, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2013) Groundwater quality assessment using WQI and GIS techniques, Dindigul district, Tamil Nadu, India. Arab J Geosci 6:4179–4189
Majumdar D, Gupta N (2000) Nitrate pollution of groundwater and associated human health disorders. Indian J Environ Health 42:28–39
McCray JE, Kirkland SL, Siegrist RL, Thyne GD (2005) Model parameters for simulating fate and transport of on-site wastewater nutrients. Ground Water 43:628–639
Modibo Sidibé A, Lin X, Koné S (2019) Assessing groundwater mineralization process, quality, and isotopic recharge origin in the Sahel Region in Africa. Water 11:789
Mostafa MG, Uddin SMH, Haque ABMH (2017) Assessment of hydrogeochemistry and groundwater quality of Rajshahi City in Bangladesh. Appl Water Sci. 7:4663–4671
Narsimha A, Sudarshan V (2013) Hydrogeochemistry of groundwater in Basara area, Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh, India. J Appl Geochem 15:224–237
Naseem S, Rafique T, Bashir E, Bhanger MI, Laghari A, Usmani TH (2010) Lithological influences on occurrence of high-fluoride groundwater in Nagar Parkar area, Thar Desert, Pakistan. Chemosphere 78:1313–1321
Ozsvath DL (2006) Fluoride concentrations in a crystalline bedrock aquifer Marathon County, Wisconsin. Environ Geol 50:132–138
Panda RB, Sahu BK, Garnaik BK, Sinha BK, Nayak A (1991) Investigation of water quality of Brahmani River. Indian J Environ Health 33:45–50
Pandey HK, Duggal SK, Jamatia A (2016) Fluoride contamination of groundwater and it’s hydrogeological evolution in District Sonbhadra (UP) India. Proc Natl Acad Sci, India, Sect A 86:81–93
Panigrahi T, Das KK, Dey BS, Panda RB (2012) Assessment of Water Quality of river Sono, Balasore. Int J Environ Sci 3:49–56
Panneerselvam B, Paramasivam SK, Karuppannan S et al (2020a) A GIS-based evaluation of hydrochemical characterisation of groundwater in hard rock region, South Tamil Nadu. India Arab J Geosci 13(17):1–22
Panneerselvam, B., Karuppannan, S., & Muniraj, K. (2020b). Evaluation of drinking and irrigation suitability of groundwater with special emphasizing the health risk posed by nitrate contamination using nitrate pollution index (NPI) and human health risk assessment (HHRA). Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An Int J, pp 1–25.
Pius A, Jerome C, Sharma N (2012) Evaluation of groundwater quality in and around Peenya industrial area of Bangalore, South India using GIS techniques. Environ Monit Assess 184:4067–4077
Rafique T, Naseem S, Usmani TH, Bashir E, Khan FA, Bhanger MI (2009) Geochemical factors controlling the occurrence of high fluoride groundwater in the Nagar Parkar area, Sindh, Pakistan. J Hazard Mater 171:424–430
Raju NJ, Dey S, Das K (2009) Fluoride contamination in groundwater of Sonbhadra district, Uttar Pradesh, India. Curr Sci 96:979–985
Rao NS (2006) Nitrate pollution and its distribution in the groundwater of Srikakulam district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 51:631–645
Rao NS (2009) Fluoride in groundwater, Varaha River Basin, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Monit Assess 152:47–60
Ravindra K, Garg VK (2007) Hydro-chemical survey of groundwater of Hisar city and assessment of defluoridation methods used in India. Environ Monit Assess 132:33–43
Rivett MO, Russ SR, Morgan P, Smith JW, Bemment N, CD, (2008) Nitrate attenuation in groundwater: a review of biogeochemical controlling processes. Water Res 42:4215–4232
Sadat-Noori SM, Ebrahimi K, Liaghat AM (2014) Groundwater quality assessment using the Water Quality Index and GIS in Saveh-Nobaran aquifer. Iran Environ Earth Sci 71:3827–3843
Sarfo AK, Shankar K (2020) Application of geospatial technologies in the COVID-19 fight of Ghana. Transact Indian Nat Acad Eng 5:193–204
Saxena V, Ahmed S (2003) Inferring the chemical parameters for the dissolution of fluoride in groundwater. Environ Geol 43:731–736
Selvam S, Manimaran G, Sivasubramanian P (2013) Hydrochemical characteristics and GIS-based assessment of groundwater quality in the coastal aquifers of Tuticorin Corporation, Tamilnadu, India. Appl Water Sci 3:145–159
Shankar K, Aravindan S, Rajendran S (2010) GIS based groundwater quality mapping in Paravanar River Sub-Basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Geomat Geosci 1:282–296
Shankar K, Aravindan S, Rajendran S (2011) Hydrogeochemistry of the Paravanar river sub-basin, Cuddalore District, Tamilnadu, India. E-J Chem 8:835–845
Shankar K, Aravindan S, Rajendran S (2011) Spatial distribution of groundwater quality in Paravanar river sub basin, Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu. Int J Geomat Geosci 1:914–931
Shankar K, Kawo NS (2019) Groundwater quality assessment using geospatial techniques and WQI in North East of Adama Town, Oromia Region. Ethiopia Hydrospatial Anal 3(1):22–36
Soujanya Kamble B, Saxena PR, Kurakalva RM, Shankar K (2020) Evaluation of seasonal and temporal variations of groundwater quality around Jawaharnagar municipal solid waste dumpsite of Hyderabad city. India SN Appl Sci 2:498
Stallard RF, Edmond JM (1983) Geochemistry of the Amazon: 2. The influence of geology and weathering environment on the dissolved load. J Geophys Res: Oceans 88:9671–9688
Tripathy JK, Sahu KC (2005) Seasonal hydrochemistry of groundwater in the Barrier Spit system of the Chilika Lagoon, India. J Environ Hydrol 13:1–9
Venkateswaran S, Karuppannan S, Shankar K (2012) Groundwater quality in Pambar sub-basin, Tamil Nadu, India using GIS. Int J Recent Sci Res 3:782–787
Vikas C, Kushwaha RK, Pandit MK (2009) Hydrochemical status of groundwater in district Ajmer (NW India) with reference to fluoride distribution. J Geol Soc India 73:773–784
WHO (2017) Guideline for drinking water quality, 4th edn. World Health Organization, Geneva
Yisa J, Jimoh T (2010) Analytical studies on water quality index of river Landzu. Am J Appl Sci. 7:453–458
Download references
Acknowledgements
Our thanks go to Central Groundwater Board (CGWB), Lucknow, NR, Region and Department of Soil Science & Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi for their valuable support during the chemical analysis of groundwater samples.
There is no sponsored/finical assistance is involved in the present research work.
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Geology, Institute of Science, CAS, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India
Arjun Ram & Abhishek Kumar Chaurasia
UGC-HRDC, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India
S. K. Tiwari
Department of Civil Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj, 211004, UP, India
H. K. Pandey
Central Groundwater Board, Lucknow, 226021, UP, India
Supriya Singh
Department of Soil Science & Agricultural Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India
Y. V. Singh
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to H. K. Pandey .
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest.
This is certified that there is no conflict of interest either academic or commercial.
Ethical standards
The research work is original in nature and does not contain the others findings accept referred work. Therefore, the entire manuscript follows the Ethical Standards.
Additional information
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Ram, A., Tiwari, S.K., Pandey, H.K. et al. Groundwater quality assessment using water quality index (WQI) under GIS framework. Appl Water Sci 11 , 46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01376-7
Download citation
Received : 27 May 2020
Accepted : 25 January 2021
Published : 12 February 2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01376-7
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Groundwater
- Hydrochemistry
- Piper diagram
- Bundelkhand massif
- Find a journal
- Publish with us
- Track your research
![NGWA new logo NGWA](https://www.ngwa.org/images/default-source/default-album/ngwa-new-logo.png?sfvrsn=1d929985_0)
- Prepare a Research Paper for Groundwater
- Peer Review Process
- Types of Articles Published in Groundwater
- Submission Policies
- Open Access
- Volunteer to be a Reviewer
Topics on any subject pertaining to groundwater will be considered for publication.
Manuscripts must not have been previously published or currently submitted elsewhere for publication while in review for Groundwater ® .
See an example Groundwater manuscript.
Articles “prepublished” as preprints or in similar “early-submission repositories” can be submitted to Groundwater . If the article has been rejected for formal publication elsewhere, Groundwater will only accept a substantially revised version of the prepublished manuscript. Mention of prepublication and manuscript status must be made at time of submission. If accepted and published in Groundwater , a special footnote will be added which mentions the repository the preprint is housed in as well as the preprint’s DOI number.
Papers of several different types are published in Groundwater . Please consult the definitions of paper types. Also please note that various paper types have different limits on paper length and other specific requirements.
Manuscripts and all figures must be in an electronic format in order to utilize our online review system. Manuscripts should be prepared in a word processing program, such as Microsoft Word, double spaced in size 12-point font, with line numbering.
- Manuscripts must be in English.
- Title should be fewer than 100 characters (including punctuation and spaces).
- Abstract should contain fewer than 250 words.
- The article impact statement should be no more than 140 characters (including punctuation and spaces).
- Number pages consecutively starting with the title page.
- Use the “line numbering” feature in your word processing program.
Units of measurements
- Abbreviations, symbols, units, and Greek letters should be identified the first time they are used.
- Isotopic data should be expressed following the guidelines set forth in Ground Water 34, no. 3, page 388 (1996). See the guidelines (PDF).
- Either metric, SI, or U.S. customary (English) units may be used. If U.S. customary units are used, the author is asked to provide the conversion to metric/SI units in parenthesis when units are given in the text of the paper. It is not necessary to give the conversions in tables and figures.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments should be made only for significant contributions by professional associates, permission to publish by employer, access to land or equipment, financial support, and reviews. A brief closing statement will usually suffice.
- Indicate in text by author(s) name and year (e.g., Jones 1999). For multiple references by the same author in the same year, the letters a, b, and c after the year can be used (e.g., Jones 1999a and 1999b). Papers with multiple authors should be cited in the text using “et al.” (e.g., Jones et al. 1999).
- At the end of the paper, list alphabetically by author(s) name in chronological order.
- Write in the style of the Harvard referencing style. View reference samples.
- Do not reference limited access, administrative, or confidential reports or commercial products for which a charge will be made for access.
- Include personal communication references (written or oral) in the reference list.
- Do not abbreviate publication titles.
- We require that journal papers be cited using both volume and issue number (e.g., Groundwater 32, no. 4: 257-269).
- Do not use footnotes. (Footnotes are acceptable in tables only.)
It is highly recommended that authors utilize some of the many online search engines to ensure that all publications relevant to their research are identified.
Supporting information
Supporting information is important, ancillary information relevant to the article that does not appear in the print or online version of the journal. It can comprise additional tables, data sets, figures, movie files, audio clips, 3-D structures, and other related nonessential multimedia files. Read more detail from Wiley on supporting information.
Should be numbered and titled. Tables should be embedded “inline” in the manuscript.
- Figures should be prepared at the final publication size (8.25 cm wide for one column and 17.15 cm wide for two columns). It is a good idea to prepare your figures with final publication requirements in mind, and then convert them into formats appropriate for online review.
- Color figures are published free of charge to the author. However, as there are additional costs to print color, it is asked that the author use color figures only when necessary to improve the clarity of the figure.
- Digital figures are required. Digital figures must have a resolution of at least 300 dpi (dots per inch) and be submitted in a TIF or EPS format with embedded fonts.
- Always submit the image at its final size. For Groundwater , that is 8.25 cm wide for one-column art and 17.15 cm wide for two-column art.
- Generate the image at line screens of 85 lines per inch (lpi) or lower.
- When applying multiple shades of gray, differentiate the gray levels by at least 20 percent. In other words, apply gray in increments or steps no closer than 20 percent. Use 20 percent black, 40 percent black, and 60 percent black. Alternatively, use various pattern backgrounds (solid dots, lines, bricks, diamonds, squares, etc.).
- Never use levels of gray below 20 percent or above 70 percent black. Levels of gray outside these guidelines will either fade out or become totally black upon printing.
- Use thick, solid lines that are no finer than 1 point in thickness.
- Use bold, solid type. Avoid using type with serifs (e.g., Times); sans serif type (e.g., Helvetica) reproduces best.
- At 100 percent size, no type should be smaller than 5 point.
- Avoid layering type directly over shaded or textured areas. Create a white box and place the lettering within the boundaries of the white box.
- Avoid the use of reversed type (white lettering on a black background).
- When scanning images, be sure that the originals are perfectly clean and neat. Scanners faithfully reproduce all smudges, crooked lines, and stray marks.
- When printing images that will be scanned, use high-quality laser printer paper or bond paper. Do not use photocopies. Opacity and smoothness are important quality factors in the scanning process. Use the highest resolution possible on your printer or graphics plotting device.
- When preparing figures that will be scanned, remember that surface smoothness is critical. Tape, creases, and other minor surface irregularities are unacceptable since they will produce shadows that the scanner sees as black. Maximize the black and white contrast (the toner level in the printing device must be high). The scanner does not improve contrast; it reproduces contrast as is.
- Color publication is available. Color figures are published free of charge to the author. However, as there are additional costs to print color, it is asked that the author use color figures only when necessary to improve the clarity of the figure.
Embedded Rich Media
The journal facilitates and encourages embedded rich media as part of a submitted paper. For specifications as to accepted file types and file size see: Embedded Rich Media .
Embedded rich media that includes speech must be accompanied by a transcript. This must be provided under the file designation of "Transcription". If the speech is not English, an English translation of the transcript must also be provided in the same file. Each embedded media file must be numbered (e.g. Audio 1, Audio 2, etc) as figures or tables would be. This numbering must be reflected in the manuscript (i.e. where the rich media is cited in the body text of the manuscript) and in the legend (e.g. "Video 1: Demonstration of Technique"). For every video file there should also be a placeholder image, which would usually be a still image taken from the video. This should be uploaded with the file designation "Placeholder Image (Video Only)", as well as the timestamp in seconds.
Graphical Abstract
A Graphical Abstract is a single, concise visual summary of the main topics or findings of the article. The journal allows authors the option of submitting a Graphical Abstract with all article types that have a written abstract. Upon publication, the Graphical Abstract will be displayed next to the published article within the Table of Contents on Wiley Online Library.
The Graphical Abstract should be a single-page illustration or graphic image that gives readers a visual depiction of the article’s “take-away” message. The image may be a figure or image included in the text itself, or a new figure generated specifically for this purpose.
Requirements include the following:
- The submitted image should be 5.5 inches square at 300 dpi
- Preferred file types — TIFF, PDF, JPG
- A brief one- to two-sentence summary of the key findings presented in the paper.
Before you submit your paper, please gather the following information
- Author information. The first and last name and affiliation of all authors, and the postal address, telephone and fax numbers, and email address of the corresponding author. The person who uploads the manuscript must be the corresponding author.
- Title and abstract of the paper. You can copy and paste this from your manuscript.
- Paper type (e.g., research paper, issue paper) . See the definitions of the different paper types.
- Manuscript files in Microsoft Word or PDF.
- It is recommended that the manuscript contains the tables and figures embedded “inline.” This way, the author has to upload only one document. Figures can be uploaded separately, if desired.
- Figures at this stage do not have to be publication quality, but it is a good idea to start with publication-quality figures and then save them in the formats allowed by the system.
Cool Green Science
Stories of The Nature Conservancy
Mapping the World’s Groundwater-Dependent Ecosystems Reveals Protection Gaps
TNC Science Brief
Published on July 18, 2024
![research papers groundwater](https://blog.nature.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/AZ240717_D108_JPG-1.jpg?w=1024)
As climate change and human water use rapidly deplete water resources around the world, a first-of-its-kind global map shows that more than half of the world’s groundwater-dependent ecosystems are in areas with known groundwater loss, and likely at risk.
Published in Nature , this is the first time groundwater-dependent ecosystems in dryland regions have been mapped on a global scale .
The study also analyzed the protection status of groundwater-dependent ecosystems, and explored how these ecosystems overlap with human communities. Among other findings, their results show that 53% of groundwater-dependent ecosystems are in areas with known groundwater depletion , and only 21% (less than a quarter) are part of protected lands or regions with policies in place for their protection.
![research papers groundwater](https://blog.nature.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Screenshot-2024-07-17-at-12.33.33 AM.png?w=630)
The Big Picture
Ecosystems that depend on groundwater vary widely, from desert springs to mountain meadows and streams, to coastal wetlands and forests. These places are often hot spots for biological diversity and are under increasing threat from climate change and human exploitation, especially of underground aquifers and other groundwater water resources.
“Until now, the locations of these ground-water dependent ecosystems have been largely unknown, hindering our ability to track impacts, establish protective policies, and implement conservation projects to protect them,” says Melissa Rohde , an ecohydrologist and environmental consultant, who is the lead author on the study. Rohde completed the research as part of her doctoral dissertation at the State University of New York’s College of Environmental Science and Forestry and her joint work at The Nature Conservancy.
![research papers groundwater](https://blog.nature.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Screenshot-2024-07-17-at-2.41.42 PM.png?w=630)
The analysis takes advantage of the fact that an ecosystem supported by groundwater will remain greener, cooler, and wetter than other places throughout the dry season, and this can be seen with satellite imagery. But the way groundwater cools the ground surface is just one of the many ways these ecosystems provide refuge to plants and animals.
Led by scientists from TNC and the Desert Research Institute (DRI) , the global effort brought researchers together from universities, non-profit organizations, and institutions from seven countries.
“Our team at DRI had been using satellite remote sensing data to locate and characterize changes in groundwater-dependent ecosystems across the western US for many years, and this was the perfect opportunity to expand this work globally,” says Christine Albano , an ecohydrologist at DRI.
The Takeaway
Despite the study’s finding that 21% of groundwater-dependent ecosystems are under some level of protection, Rohde’s past research has shown that very few of these ecosystems are effectively protected even where such legislation exists.
Without a better understanding of how groundwater is supporting ecosystems, even protected lands could be undermined if groundwater is lost due to unsustainable use outside protected boundaries .
“We need to acknowledge that groundwater is critical for many ecosystems,” Rohde says. “Groundwater is being pumped at rates higher than it can be replenished, but we aren’t managing or regulating it to the extent necessary to prevent further ecosystem impacts. If we want to achieve our global biodiversity goals and our climate goals, then we need to connect the dots between groundwater and ecosystems.”
References:
Perone, D., et al. (2023). Stakeholder integration predicts better outcomes from groundwater sustainability policy. Nature Communications, 14, 3793
Huggins, X., et al. (2023). Overlooked risks and opportunities in groundwatersheds of the world’s protected areas. Nature Sustainability, 6, 855-864.
Read the Paper
Rohde, M., et al. (2024). Groundwater-dependent ecosystem map exposes global dryland protection needs. Nature.
Share the paper
Share this:, continue exploring.
![research papers groundwater](https://blog.nature.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Screen-Shot-2021-07-21-at-11.15.30.png?w=600&h=450&crop=1)
January 3, 2022
Story type: TNC Science Brief
![research papers groundwater](https://blog.nature.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/SACR101101_D006-scaled.jpg?w=600&h=450&crop=1)
share this!
July 23, 2024
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
Uncovering the link between meltwater and groundwater in mountain regions
by ETH Zurich
![Credit: Marit van Tiel, D-BAUG/ETH Zürich Uncovering the link between meltwater and groundwater in mountain regions](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/800a/2024/uncovering-the-link-be.jpg)
An international group of experts in mountain hydrology argue that the traditional understanding of the mountain water cycle has largely ignored the role that cryosphere-groundwater interactions play. This oversight could lead to incomplete or inaccurate predictions of water availability in mountain regions, especially in the context of climate change, suggest the authors in a Perspective Paper appearing in Nature Water .
Mountains are often referred to as water towers of the world, supplying fresh water to ecosystems and millions of people downstream. Specifically, snow and glacier melt are important elements in the water balance of mountain regions , supplying water during warmer and drier months of the year.
However, the connection between meltwater and groundwater is not well understood says Marit van Tiel, Postdoctoral researcher at the ETH Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering and lead author of the article. In particular, little is known about how glacier melt partitions between reaching rivers directly or infiltrating below the surface to recharge deeper groundwater. This information is critical to understand how both surface water and groundwater will change in the face of climate change, and plan for sustainable water management.
Challenges for sustainable water management
By synthesizing the existing research on the topic, the authors found that while meltwater contributions to groundwater can be substantial, estimates vary widely. Developing knowledge about meltwater-groundwater connectivity is complicated by the difficulties in directly measuring groundwater in remote mountain settings, requiring researchers to develop alternative approaches, which are often heavily site-specific and limit comparisons between studies.
An important open question to link the cryosphere with groundwater and the rest of the mountain water cycle is the scales at which this connectivity plays a role, both in terms of space and time. Insights into the spatiotemporal patterns of how meltwater travels to groundwater and surface water determine where, when and at what rate meltwater-sourced groundwater re-emerges through springs, discharges to surface water bodies or can be pumped from groundwater wells at lower elevations. This is a key consideration for sustainable water management both for mountain communities and downstream environments.
Call for more integrated research
The group of authors, consisting of experts in mountain hydrology, glaciology, hydrogeology, snow hydrology, water chemistry, and socio-hydrology, emphasizes that without considering the connectivity between cryosphere and groundwater , we miss out on a comprehensive understanding of how water moves and is stored in high mountain regions.
With global warming significantly impacting these sensitive areas through accelerating glacier retreat, diminishing snowpacks, and shifting precipitation patterns, there is a pressing need to understand this connectivity to better anticipate the sensitivity of mountain water supply to future climate warming. The authors call for more integrated research approaches that combine cryospheric science, hydrogeology, mountain hydrology and climate modeling to quantify and better understand these processes.
Journal information: Nature Water
Provided by ETH Zurich
Explore further
Feedback to editors
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/taco-shaped-arthropod.jpg)
Taco-shaped arthropod fossils give new insights into the history of the first mandibulates
4 hours ago
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/eyes-for-love-searchin.jpg)
When searching for light and a mate in the deep, dark sea, male dragonfish grow larger eyes, scientists discover
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/butterflies-accumulate-1.jpg)
Butterflies accumulate enough static electricity to attract pollen without contact, research finds
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/the-unintended-consequ.jpg)
The unintended consequences of success against malaria
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/a-new-way-to-make-elem.jpg)
A new way to make element 116 opens the door to heavier atoms
5 hours ago
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/combining-trapped-atom.jpg)
Combining trapped atoms and photonics for new quantum devices
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/stress-granules-found.jpg)
Stress granules found to play an unsuspected role in blood vessel formation
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/nonlinear-encoding-in-1.jpg)
New work sheds light on nonlinear encoding in diffractive optical processors based on linear materials
7 hours ago
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2020/ubereats.jpg)
Digital food ordering drives increased indulgence and spending, study reveals
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/next-generation-biosen.jpg)
Next generation biosensor reveals gibberellin's critical role in legume nitrogen-fixation
8 hours ago
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
Hydrothermal explosion versus phreatic eruption, scientists have discovered “dark oxygen” being produced in the deep ocean, apparently by lumps of metal on the seafloor.
15 hours ago
Should We Be Planting More Trees?
Jul 22, 2024
The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones
Jul 18, 2024
More Consequences of Warming Oceans
Sea stacks - scotland, ireland and elsewhere.
Jul 17, 2024
More from Earth Sciences
Related Stories
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/new-study-shows-how-qu.jpg)
New study shows how quickly surface water moves to groundwater reservoirs across Australia
Apr 18, 2024
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/new-research-predicts.jpg)
New research predicts peak groundwater extraction for key basins around the globe
Apr 25, 2024
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/high-groundwater-deple.jpg)
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Scientists predict high groundwater depletion risk in South Korea by 2080
May 30, 2024
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/climate-change-is-incr-1.jpg)
Climate change projected to warm shallow groundwater by up to 3.5°C by 2099
Jun 4, 2024
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2022/groundwater-replenishe.jpg)
Groundwater replenishes much faster than scientists previously thought
Dec 21, 2022
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/chinese-researchers-is.jpg)
Chinese researchers issue critical warning on groundwater flooding risks
May 20, 2024
Recommended for you
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/researcher-creates-a-w.jpg)
New automated system provides a way to detect elusive volcanic vibrations
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/researchers-warn-of-un.jpg)
Yellowknife study warns of unprecedented arsenic release from wildfires
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/researchers-say-suns-i.jpg)
Scientists say sun's influence penetrates into deep Earth
12 hours ago
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/researchers-develop-mo-2.jpg)
Electrothermal mineralization process offers more environmentally friendly, cost-effective method for soil remediation
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/scientists-create-an-a.jpg)
Scientists create AI model that rivals top methods for weather and climate forecasts
13 hours ago
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/tmb/2024/study-of-urban-moss-ra.jpg)
Study of urban moss raises concerns about lead levels in older Portland neighborhoods
18 hours ago
Let us know if there is a problem with our content
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form . For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines ).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
E-mail the story
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.
Newsletter sign up
Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.
More information Privacy policy
Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience
We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.
E-mail newsletter
- Partner With Us
- Faculty & Staff Directory
![research papers groundwater DRI](https://www.dri.edu/wp-content/uploads/DRI-logo-taglineWEB2.png)
- Groundwater is Key to Protecting Global Ecosystems
New research identifies ecosystems around the world that could be threatened by declining groundwater levels
Reno, Nev. (July 17, 2024) – Where hidden water tables meet the Earth’s surface, life can thrive even in the driest locations. Offering refuge during times of drought, shallow groundwater aquifers act like water savings accounts that can support ecosystems with the moisture required to survive, even as precipitation dwindles. As climate change and human water use rapidly deplete groundwater levels around the world, scientists and policy makers need better data for where these groundwater-dependent ecosystems exist. Now, a new study maps these ecosystems in dryland regions globally, examines their protection status, and explores how they overlap with human communities.
The research, published July 17 in Nature , is the first time that groundwater-dependent ecosystems have been mapped on a global scale . Led by scientists from The Nature Conservancy and the Desert Research Institute (DRI), the global effort brought researchers together from universities, non-profit organizations, and institutions from seven countries. Their results show that 53% of these ecosystems are in areas with known groundwater depletion, while only 21% exist on protected lands or regions with policies in place for their protection.
“Until now, the location of these ecosystems has been largely unknown, hindering our ability to track impacts, establish protective policies, and implement conservation projects to protect them,” says Melissa Rohde , Ph.D., ecohydrologist and environmental consultant who is the lead author on the study. Rohde completed the research as part of her doctoral dissertation at the State University of New York’s College of Environmental Science and Forestry and her joint work at The Nature Conservancy.
![research papers groundwater Map of the world with colors ranging from red to blue to indicate groundwater loss.](https://www.dri.edu/wp-content/uploads/Map-Figure-1.png)
Ecosystems that depend on groundwater vary widely, Rohde notes, from desert springs, to mountain meadows and streams, to coastal wetlands and forests. These ecosystems are often hot spots for biological diversity worldwide, and are under increasing threat from climate change and human exploitation. When Rohde’s colleagues at The Nature Conservancy offices around the world set out to conserve them, they found themselves running into a persistent lack of data — catalyzing Rohde’s mapping effort. “These ecosystems encompass these places we really care about, but their reliance on groundwater has been unacknowledged,” she says.
Using technology to advance the science of groundwater-dependent ecosystems
Without a global dataset for the location and depths of groundwater, the research team had to get creative. They gathered six years of data from NASA’s Landsat satellite, which provides satellite imagery that can be used to estimate leaf water content, evapotranspiration, vegetation greenness, open water, and land temperatures and climate data that characterizes water availability. Then, they used more than 30 thousand data points of confirmed groundwater-dependent ecosystem locations to train a computer model how to identify them based on the satellite data.
“Our team at DRI had been using satellite remote sensing data to locate and characterize changes in groundwater-dependent ecosystems across the western US for many years, and this was the perfect opportunity to expand this work globally,” says Christine Albano , Ph.D., ecohydrologist at DRI.
The analysis takes advantage of the fact that an ecosystem supported by groundwater will remain greener, cooler, and wetter than other places throughout the dry season, and this can be seen with satellite imagery. “Our approach leverages what we already know about the characteristics of these ecosystems,” Rohde says, noting that the way groundwater cools the ground surface is just one of the many ways that these ecosystems provide refuge to plants and animals.
“It continues to amaze me that we now have the data and technology to capture and analyze information for places the size of a basketball court or a swimming pool, and that we can do this across the entire globe,” says Albano. “Having this level of spatial detail is critical for this analysis, because it is often the groundwater-dependent springs or wetlands that are about this size, or even smaller, that are the most critical to people and wildlife.”
The result is a global map of where ecosystems dependent on groundwater existed from 2015-2020, combined with a statistical likelihood of the researchers’ confidence in each location’s groundwater dependence. “A few years ago, an analysis like this would not have been possible, but we can now leverage recent advances in machine learning and cloud computing to fill critical knowledge gaps for conservation at a global scale,” says Kirk Klausmeyer, Director of Data Science for The Nature Conservancy in California and co-author of the study. By testing the computer model’s ability to identify known groundwater-dependent ecosystems, they estimate accuracy at around 87%.
“The intention of our map is that it be used as a starting point,” Rohde says. “It provides essential information on where they are likely located and most at risk of groundwater depletion, so that we can advance the protection of these biologically diverse ecosystems, and the societies dependent upon them.”
The map shows these ecosystems are more intact and extensive in Central Asia, the Sahel region of Africa, and South America, where pastoral communities are common. This contrasts with their depletion and fragmentation in parts of the world where groundwater pumping and agricultural irrigation reign, such as North America and Australia. In the latter regions, many of these ecosystems have already been lost, as groundwater tables fall below the level where plant roots or streams can reach them.
![research papers groundwater On top of a cliff overlooking the ocean at Point Reyes with a walking path and wildflowers.](https://www.dri.edu/wp-content/uploads/pic-tomales-point-trail-amk-190529-2048x1365-1-1024x682.jpg)
Overcoming conservation challenges
To illustrate the role of these ecosystems in supporting rural livelihoods, the study also focused in on the Greater Sahel region of Africa, where four conflict hotspots overlap with locations containing a high number of groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Climate change is exacerbating food insecurity in these locations, resulting in expanded crop cultivation into previously pastoral lands, demonstrating the importance of recognizing the complex interactions of climate change and land and water conservation efforts.
“These ecosystems have a direct impact on the rural livelihoods of pastoralists,” Rohde says. “While sustainable groundwater management policies may be politically tractable in some regions, humanitarian assistance that protect ecosystems for sustaining rural livelihoods or reducing conflict might be more appropriate in other regions. There needs to be creative solutions to preserving these ecosystems, and that’s going to vary a lot depending on where you are in the world.”
Despite the study’s determination that 21% of groundwater-dependent ecosystems are under some level of protection, Rohde’s other research has demonstrated that very few ecosystems are effectively protected where legislation exists. Without a better understanding of how groundwater is supporting ecosystems, even protected lands could be undermined if groundwater is lost due to unsustainable use outside protected boundaries .
“We need to acknowledge that groundwater is critical for many ecosystems,” Rohde says. “Groundwater is being pumped at rates higher than it can be replenished, but we aren’t managing or regulating it to the extent necessary to prevent further ecosystem impacts. If we want to achieve our global biodiversity goals and our climate goals, then we need to connect the dots between groundwater and ecosystems.”
More information: The full study, Groundwater-dependent ecosystem map exposes global dryland protection needs, is available from Nature at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07702-8
For an interactive version of the high-resolution global map and probability layer, visit https://codefornature.projects.earthengine.app/view/global-gde
Study authors include : Melissa M. Rohde, Christine M. Albano, Xander Huggins, Kirk R. Klausmeyer, Charles Morton, Ali Sharman, Esha Zaveri, Laurel Saito, Zach Freed, Jeanette K. Howard, Nancy Job, Holly Richter, Kristina Toderich, Aude-Sophie Rodella, Tom Gleeson, Justin Huntington, Hrishikesh A. Chandanpurkar, Adam J. Purdy, James S. Famiglietti, Michael Bliss Singer, Dar A. Roberts, Kelly Caylor, and John C. Stella. For a list of the authors’ institutions, please refer to the study: 10.1038/s41586-024-07702-8
We are Nevada’s non-profit research institute, founded in 1959 to empower experts to focus on science that matters. We work with communities across the state — and the world — to address their most pressing scientific questions. We’re proud that our scientists continuously produce solutions that better human and environmental health.
Scientists at DRI are encouraged to follow their research interests across the traditional boundaries of scientific fields, collaborating across DRI and with scientists worldwide. All faculty support their own research through grants, bringing in nearly $5 to the Nevada economy for every $1 of state funds received. With more than 600 scientists, engineers, students, and staff across our Reno and Las Vegas campuses, we conducted more than $47 million in sponsored research focused on improving peoples’ lives in 2023 alone.
At DRI, science isn’t merely academic — it’s the key to future-proofing our communities and building a better world. For more information, please visit www.dri.edu.
About The Nature Conservancy
The Nature Conservancy is a global conservation organization dedicated to conserving the lands and waters on which all life depends. Guided by science, we create innovative, on-the-ground solutions to our world’s toughest challenges so that nature and people can thrive together. We are tackling climate change, conserving lands, waters and oceans at an unprecedented scale, providing food and water sustainably and helping make cities more sustainable. Working in 72 countries, we use a collaborative approach that engages local communities, governments, the private sector, and other partners. To learn more, visit www.nature.org or follow @nature_press on Twitter.
Media Contacts:
DRI Elyse DeFranco Science Writer [email protected]
TNC Jay Harrod Associate Director of Marketing [email protected]
July 17, 2024
Subscribe via RSS
Albano | DHS | Groundwater | Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems | Hydrologic Sciences
Search dri news and announcements, latest news and announcements.
- DRI Donors Value Hard Work, Integrity, and Service to Their Community by Establishing an Endowment
Mars Likely Had Cold and Icy Past, New Study Finds
- EPA Selects Nevada’s Desert Research Institute for Funding to Support Environmental Education
- Reno-Sparks Heat Mapping Project Now Recruiting Volunteers
- Native Climate Team Holds Indigenous Education Workshop
You May Also Like…
![research papers groundwater Mars Likely Had Cold and Icy Past, New Study Finds](https://www.dri.edu/wp-content/uploads/20181021_134413-WEB-400x250.jpg)
Jul 10, 2024
A new study finds evidence to support that Mars had a cold and icy past by identifying similarities between soils found on Mars and those of Canada’s Newfoundland, a cold subarctic climate. The study, published July 7th in Communications Earth and Environment, looked for soils on Earth with comparable materials to Mars’ Gale Crater.
![research papers groundwater River ‘Plastisphere’ Serves as Home to Ecosystem-Draining Organisms](https://www.dri.edu/wp-content/uploads/unknown-6-400x250.png)
River ‘Plastisphere’ Serves as Home to Ecosystem-Draining Organisms
Jun 14, 2024
New research explores the microbial communities that live on plastic waste and how they impact the 2nd most biodiverse river in the world. DRI researchers Monica Arienzo and Rachel Kozloski are co-authors on this new study that examines the ecological impacts of plastic waste in Cambodia’s Mekong River.
![research papers groundwater Western Agricultural Communities Need Water Conservation Strategies to Adapt to Future Shortages](https://www.dri.edu/wp-content/uploads/Meadow-with-Cows-and-Mountains-400x250.jpg)
Western Agricultural Communities Need Water Conservation Strategies to Adapt to Future Shortages
Jun 12, 2024
Relying on water storage won’t be enough to make up for declines in future water availability under a changing climate, new study shows. Beatrice Gordon, lead author of the study and sociohydrologist and postdoctoral researcher at DRI, says the research is needed to inform water management at the local level, where most decisions are made.
DRI's Privacy and Cookies Policy
Privacy overview.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
![research papers groundwater NASA Logo](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/themes/nasa/assets/images/nasa-logo@2x.png)
Suggested Searches
Climate Change
- Expedition 64
- Mars perseverance
- SpaceX Crew-2
- International Space Station
- View All Topics A-Z
Humans in Space
Earth & Climate
The solar system, the universe, aeronautics, learning resources, news & events.
![research papers groundwater Visualization of Earth](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/1-arctic-ams-2010246-lrg.jpg?w=1024)
NASA-Funded Studies Explain How Climate Is Changing Earth’s Rotation
![research papers groundwater Buzz and Neil set up the flag](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/moon-landing-37-armstrong-aldrin-setting-up-flag-frame-from-16-mm-jul-20-1969-ap11-s69-40308.jpg?w=576)
55 Years Ago: Apollo 11’s One Small Step, One Giant Leap
![research papers groundwater Hubble Studies a Potential Galactic Merger](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/hubble-ngc5238-potw2429a.jpg)
Hubble Studies a Potential Galactic Merger
- Search All NASA Missions
- A to Z List of Missions
- Upcoming Launches and Landings
- Spaceships and Rockets
- Communicating with Missions
- James Webb Space Telescope
- Hubble Space Telescope
- Why Go to Space
- Commercial Space
- Destinations
- Living in Space
- Explore Earth Science
- Earth, Our Planet
- Earth Science in Action
- Earth Multimedia
- Earth Science Researchers
- Pluto & Dwarf Planets
- Asteroids, Comets & Meteors
- The Kuiper Belt
- The Oort Cloud
- Skywatching
- The Search for Life in the Universe
- Black Holes
- The Big Bang
- Dark Energy & Dark Matter
- Earth Science
- Planetary Science
- Astrophysics & Space Science
- The Sun & Heliophysics
- Biological & Physical Sciences
- Lunar Science
- Citizen Science
- Astromaterials
- Aeronautics Research
- Human Space Travel Research
- Science in the Air
- NASA Aircraft
- Flight Innovation
- Supersonic Flight
- Air Traffic Solutions
- Green Aviation Tech
- Drones & You
- Technology Transfer & Spinoffs
- Space Travel Technology
- Technology Living in Space
- Manufacturing and Materials
- Science Instruments
- For Kids and Students
- For Educators
- For Colleges and Universities
- For Professionals
- Science for Everyone
- Requests for Exhibits, Artifacts, or Speakers
- STEM Engagement at NASA
- NASA's Impacts
- Centers and Facilities
- Directorates
- Organizations
- People of NASA
- Internships
- Our History
- Doing Business with NASA
- Get Involved
NASA en Español
- Aeronáutica
- Ciencias Terrestres
- Sistema Solar
- All NASA News
- Video Series on NASA+
- Newsletters
- Social Media
- Media Resources
- Upcoming Launches & Landings
- Virtual Events
- Sounds and Ringtones
- Interactives
- STEM Multimedia
![research papers groundwater 10 Things for Mars 10](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8413_PIA06739-16x9-1.jpg)
10 Things for Mars 10
![research papers groundwater An artist’s illustration depicting NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory in flight, with a vivid star field behind it. Chandra’s solar panels are deployed and its camera “eye” open on the cosmos.](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/9903924_medium.jpg?w=1024)
25 Years On, Chandra Highlights Legacy of NASA Engineering Ingenuity
![research papers groundwater iss071e329920 (July 12, 2024) -- Northrop Grumman's Cygnus space freighter and its two cymbal-shaped solar arrays is pictured attached to the Canadarm2 robotic arm ahead of its release from the International Space Station's Unity module on July 12, 2024.](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/iss071e329920.jpg?w=1024)
NASA’s 21st Northrop Grumman Mission Launches Scientific Studies to Station
![research papers groundwater](https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/sts093-321-017/sts093-321-017~large.jpg?w=1920&h=1266&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint)
Eileen Collins Broke Barriers as America’s First Female Space Shuttle Commander
![research papers groundwater C7M3 crew](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/herac7m3crew-1.png?w=1024)
NASA Research Volunteers to Begin Next Simulated Mission to Mars
![research papers groundwater Watch Carbon Dioxide Move Through Earth’s Atmosphere](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/dyamondpointcloud-12-1-2023b-dyamond-co2-anim-globe-orbit-3x3hyperwall-00200-print.jpg)
Watch Carbon Dioxide Move Through Earth’s Atmosphere
![research papers groundwater Registration Opens for the 2024 NASA International Space Apps Challenge](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/nasa-space-apps-team-photo.jpg)
Registration Opens for the 2024 NASA International Space Apps Challenge
![research papers groundwater Ice Giant Resources](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/uranus-and-neptune.png)
Ice Giant Resources
![research papers groundwater This image features the Cassiopeia A supernova, an expanding ball of matter and energy ejected from an exploding star. Here, rings of neon blue and brilliant white emit veins of polished gold. The rings and their arching veins encircle a place of relative calm at the center of the supernova remnant. This hole at the center of the circle, and the three-dimensionality conveyed by the rings and their arching veins, give this image of Cassiopeia A the look of a giant, crackling, electric blue donut. X-rays detected by Chandra show debris from the destroyed star and the blast wave from the explosion.](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/x25th-casa.jpg?w=1024)
25 Images to Celebrate NASA’s Chandra 25th Anniversary
![research papers groundwater NASA: Life Signs Could Survive Near Surfaces of Enceladus and Europa](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/pia11688.jpg)
NASA: Life Signs Could Survive Near Surfaces of Enceladus and Europa
![research papers groundwater NASA Rocket Discovers New Energization Process in Upper Atmosphere](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/timelapse-trice2-8dec2018.jpg)
NASA Rocket Discovers New Energization Process in Upper Atmosphere
![research papers groundwater Seed Funding Proposals Due November 19 This Year!](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/seed-funding-proposals.png)
Seed Funding Proposals Due November 19 This Year!
![research papers groundwater An illustration shows NASA's pavilion at Oshkosh, a large white tent with NASA logos on it, as six different aircraft appear to fly toward the center of the image over the tent.](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/oshkosh-2024-live-top-16x9-1.jpg?w=1024)
LIVE: NASA is with you from Oshkosh
Nasa to host panels, forums, and more at oshkosh 2024.
![research papers groundwater NASA astronaut Engle poses in front of space shuttle Enterprise during its first rollout in 1976](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/x-15-rollout-29-engle-w-enterprise-s76-29560.jpg?w=1024)
Remembering Joe Engle: Astronaut, Test Pilot, Legend
![research papers groundwater NASA astronaut wearing a mockup spacesuit system, illuminated by the lights on her helmet as she hammers a drive tube into the ground. Civil Space Challenges](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jsc2024e035655orig-e1721330918408.jpg?w=1024)
NASA Releases First Integrated Ranking of Civil Space Challenges
![research papers groundwater](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/artemis-humans-space-moon-gateway-main.jpg?w=1024)
Ground Antenna Trio to Give NASA’s Artemis Campaign ‘LEGS’ to Stand On
![research papers groundwater PIXL Viewed on Mars](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/e1-pia24467.jpg?w=1024)
Here’s How AI Is Changing NASA’s Mars Rover Science
![research papers groundwater Helping student’s Summer Slide With NASA STEM. Three young students, a girl and two boys, having fun while they blow into straws to launch their soda-straw rockets.](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/52154664239-c204ff1706-k.jpg?w=1024)
Slow Your Student’s ‘Summer Slide’ and Beat Boredom With NASA STEM
![research papers groundwater](https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/KSC-20240226-PH-SPX02_0005/KSC-20240226-PH-SPX02_0005~large.jpg?w=1920&h=1280&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint)
Experience the Launch of NASA’s SpaceX Crew-9 Mission
![research papers groundwater A group of people testing out their “cereal box” pin-hole viewers to study the sun](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/3-cerealboxviewer.jpg?w=1024)
NASA Awards Launch Excitement for STEM Learning Nationwide
![research papers groundwater NASA Astronaut Official Portrait Frank Rubio](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/jsc2017e114795_0.jpg?w=819)
Astronauta de la NASA Frank Rubio
![research papers groundwater 2021 Astronaut Candidates Stand in Recognition](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/51732141513-ebd913d411-k.jpg?w=1024)
Diez maneras en que los estudiantes pueden prepararse para ser astronautas
![research papers groundwater Astronaut Marcos Berrios](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/astronaut_candidate_marcos_berrios.jpg?w=819)
Astronauta de la NASA Marcos Berríos
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Decades of Polar Motion
Longer days, news media contacts.
![research papers groundwater Visualization of Earth](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/1-arctic-ams-2010246-lrg.jpg?w=1280)
Researchers used more than 120 years of data to decipher how melting ice, dwindling groundwater, and rising seas are nudging the planet’s spin axis and lengthening days.
Days on Earth are growing slightly longer, and that change is accelerating. The reason is connected to the same mechanisms that also have caused the planet’s axis to meander by about 30 feet (10 meters) in the past 120 years. The findings come from two recent NASA-funded studies focused on how the climate-related redistribution of ice and water has affected Earth’s rotation.
This redistribution occurs when ice sheets and glaciers melt more than they grow from snowfall and when aquifers lose more groundwater than precipitation replenishes. These resulting shifts in mass cause the planet to wobble as it spins and its axis to shift location — a phenomenon called polar motion. They also cause Earth’s rotation to slow, measured by the lengthening of the day. Both have been recorded since 1900.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Analyzing polar motion across 12 decades, scientists attributed nearly all of the periodic oscillations in the axis’ position to changes in groundwater, ice sheets, glaciers, and sea levels. According to a paper published recently in Nature Geoscience , the mass variations during the 20th century mostly resulted from natural climate cycles.
The same researchers teamed on a subsequent study that focused on day length. They found that, since 2000, days have been getting longer by about 1.33 milliseconds per 100 years, a faster pace than at any point in the prior century. The cause: the accelerated melting of glaciers and the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets due to human-caused greenhouse emissions. Their results were published July 15 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences .
“The common thread between the two papers is that climate-related changes on Earth’s surface, whether human-caused or not, are strong drivers of the changes we’re seeing in the planet’s rotation,” said Surendra Adhikari, a co-author of both papers and a geophysicist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California.
In the earliest days, scientists tracked polar motion by measuring the apparent movement of stars. They later switched to very long baseline interferometry , which analyzes radio signals from quasars, or satellite laser ranging , which points lasers at satellites.
Researchers have long surmised that polar motion results from a combination of processes in Earth’s interior and at the surface. Less clear was how much each process shifts the axis and what kind of effect each exerts — whether cyclical movements that repeat in periods from weeks to decades, or sustained drift over the course of centuries or millennia.
For their paper, researchers used machine-learning algorithms to dissect the 120-year record. They found that 90% of recurring fluctuations between 1900 and 2018 could be explained by changes in groundwater, ice sheets, glaciers, and sea level. The remainder mostly resulted from Earth’s interior dynamics, like the wobble from the tilt of the inner core with respect to the bulk of the planet.
The patterns of polar motion linked to surface mass shifts repeated a few times about every 25 years during the 20th century, suggesting to the researchers that they were largely due to natural climate variations. Past papers have drawn connections between more recent polar motion and human activities, including one authored by Adhikari that attributed a sudden eastward drift of the axis (starting around 2000) to faster melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets and groundwater depletion in Eurasia.
That research focused on the past two decades, during which groundwater and ice mass loss as well as sea level rise — all measured via satellites — have had strong connections to human-caused climate change.
“It’s true to a certain degree” that human activities factor into polar motion, said Mostafa Kiani Shahvandi, lead author of both papers and a doctoral student at the Swiss university ETH Zurich. “But there are natural modes in the climate system that have the main effect on polar motion oscillations.”
For the second paper, the authors used satellite observations of mass change from the GRACE mission (short for Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) and its follow-on GRACE-FO , as well as previous mass-balance studies that analyzed the contributions of changes in groundwater, ice sheets, and glaciers to sea level rise in the 20th century to reconstruct changes in the length of days due to those factors from 1900 to 2018.
Scientists have known through historical eclipse records that length of day has been growing for millennia. While almost imperceptible to humans, the lag must be accounted for because many modern technologies, including GPS, rely on precise timekeeping.
In recent decades, the faster melting of ice sheets has shifted mass from the poles toward the equatorial ocean. This flattening causes Earth to decelerate and the day to lengthen, similar to when an ice skater lowers and spreads their arms to slow a spin.
The authors noticed an uptick just after 2000 in how fast the day was lengthening, a change closely correlated with independent observations of the flattening. For the period from 2000 to 2018, the rate of length-of-day increase due to movement of ice and groundwater was 1.33 milliseconds per century — faster than at any period in the prior 100 years, when it varied from 0.3 to 1.0 milliseconds per century.
The lengthening due to ice and groundwater changes could decelerate by 2100 under a climate scenario of severely reduced emissions, the researchers note. (Even if emissions were to stop today, previously released gases — particularly carbon dioxide — would linger for decades longer.)
If emissions continue to rise, lengthening of day from climate change could reach as high as 2.62 milliseconds per century, overtaking the effect of the Moon’s pull on tides, which has been increasing Earth’s length of day by 2.4 milliseconds per century, on average. Called lunar tidal friction, the effect has been the primary cause of Earth’s day-length increase for billions for years.
“In barely 100 years, human beings have altered the climate system to such a degree that we’re seeing the impact on the very way the planet spins,” Adhikari said.
Andrew Wang / Jane J. Lee Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. 626-379-6874 / 818-354-0307 [email protected] / [email protected]
Related Terms
- Earth Science Division
- Earth's Moon
- GRACE (Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment)
- GRACE-FO (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-on)
Explore More
![research papers groundwater](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/dyamondpointcloud-12-1-2023b-dyamond-co2-anim-globe-orbit-3x3hyperwall-00200-print.jpg)
What we’re looking at This global map shows concentrations of carbon dioxide as the gas…
![research papers groundwater](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/lunar-pits.webp)
New Evidence Adds to Findings Hinting at Network of Caves on Moon
An international team of scientists using data from NASA’s LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) has discovered…
![research papers groundwater](https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/auroraborealis-vir-20240511-lrg.jpg)
The Earth Observer Editor’s Corner: Summer 2024
NASA’s third EOS mission—AURA—marked 20 years in orbit on July 15, with two of its…
Discover Related Topics
![research papers groundwater](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/plugins/nasa-blocks/assets/images/topic-cards/topic-card-sample-1.jpg)
Solar System
![research papers groundwater](https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/plugins/nasa-blocks/assets/images/topic-cards/topic-card-sample-4.jpg)
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
- View all journals
- Explore content
- About the journal
- Publish with us
- Sign up for alerts
- Review Article
- Published: 31 January 2023
Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future
- Bridget R. Scanlon ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-4199 1 ,
- Sarah Fakhreddine 1 , 2 ,
- Ashraf Rateb 1 ,
- Inge de Graaf ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-868X 3 ,
- Jay Famiglietti 4 ,
- Tom Gleeson 5 ,
- R. Quentin Grafton 6 ,
- Esteban Jobbagy 7 ,
- Seifu Kebede 8 ,
- Seshagiri Rao Kolusu 9 ,
- Leonard F. Konikow 10 ,
- Di Long ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9033-5039 11 ,
- Mesfin Mekonnen ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3573-9759 12 ,
- Hannes Müller Schmied 13 , 14 ,
- Abhijit Mukherjee 15 ,
- Alan MacDonald ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6636-1499 16 ,
- Robert C. Reedy 1 ,
- Mohammad Shamsudduha 17 ,
- Craig T. Simmons 18 ,
- Alex Sun 1 ,
- Richard G. Taylor 19 ,
- Karen G. Villholth 20 ,
- Charles J. Vörösmarty 21 &
- Chunmiao Zheng ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5839-1305 22
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment volume 4 , pages 87–101 ( 2023 ) Cite this article
16k Accesses
180 Citations
289 Altmetric
Metrics details
- Hydrogeology
- Water resources
An Author Correction to this article was published on 29 March 2023
This article has been updated
Water is a critical resource, but ensuring its availability faces challenges from climate extremes and human intervention. In this Review, we evaluate the current and historical evolution of water resources, considering surface water and groundwater as a single, interconnected resource. Total water storage trends have varied across regions over the past century. Satellite data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) show declining, stable and rising trends in total water storage over the past two decades in various regions globally. Groundwater monitoring provides longer-term context over the past century, showing rising water storage in northwest India, central Pakistan and the northwest United States, and declining water storage in the US High Plains and Central Valley. Climate variability causes some changes in water storage, but human intervention, particularly irrigation, is a major driver. Water-resource resilience can be increased by diversifying management strategies. These approaches include green solutions, such as forest and wetland preservation, and grey solutions, such as increasing supplies (desalination, wastewater reuse), enhancing storage in surface reservoirs and depleted aquifers, and transporting water. A diverse portfolio of these solutions, in tandem with managing groundwater and surface water as a single resource, can address human and ecosystem needs while building a resilient water system.
Net trends in total water storage data from the GRACE satellite mission range from −310 km 3 to 260 km 3 total over a 19-year record in different regions globally, caused by climate and human intervention.
Groundwater and surface water are strongly linked, with 85% of groundwater withdrawals sourced from surface water capture and reduced evapotranspiration, and the remaining 15% derived from aquifer depletion.
Climate and human interventions caused loss of ~90,000 km 2 of surface water area between 1984 and 2015, while 184,000 km 2 of new surface water area developed elsewhere, primarily through filling reservoirs.
Human intervention affects water resources directly through water use, particularly irrigation, and indirectly through land-use change, such as agricultural expansion and urbanization.
Strategies for increasing water-resource resilience include preserving and restoring forests and wetlands, and conjunctive surface water and groundwater management.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
24,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
92,52 € per year
only 7,71 € per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
![research papers groundwater](https://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs43017-022-00378-6/MediaObjects/43017_2022_378_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-019-1594-4/MediaObjects/41586_2019_1594_Fig1_HTML.png)
Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-020-17581-y/MediaObjects/41467_2020_17581_Fig1_HTML.png)
Divergent effects of climate change on future groundwater availability in key mid-latitude aquifers
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://media.springernature.com/w215h120/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41893-024-01306-w/MediaObjects/41893_2024_1306_Fig1_HTML.png)
Global peak water limit of future groundwater withdrawals
Change history, 29 march 2023.
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00418-9
Vorosmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467 , 555–561 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Doell, P., Mueller Schmied, H., Schuh, C., Portmann, F. T. & Eicker, A. Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater abstractions: combining hydrological modeling with information from well observations and GRACE satellites. Water Resour. Res. 50 , 5698–5720 (2014).
Wada, Y. et al. Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37 , L20402 (2010).
Douville, H. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 1055–1210 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Olivier, D. W. & Xu, Y. X. Making effective use of groundwater to avoid another water supply crisis in Cape Town, South Africa. Hydrogeol. J. 27 , 823–826 (2019).
Ozment, S. et al. Natural infrastructure in Sao Paulo’s water system. World Resources Institute Report 2013–2014: Interim Findings (2018).
Pascale, S., Kapnick, S. B., Delworth, T. L. & Cooke, W. F. Increasing risk of another Cape Town ‘Day Zero’ drought in the 21st century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117 , 29495 (2020).
Alley, W. M., Reilly, T. E. & Franke, O. L. Sustainability of ground-water resources. US Geological Survey Circular 1186 (1999).
Breslin, S. COP26 has 4 goals. Water is central to all of them. SIWI News https://siwi.org/latest/cop26-has-4-goals-water-is-central-to-all-of-them/ (2021).
Global Risks 2021 16th edition (World Economic Forum, 2021); https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2021/
The Water Challenge: The Roundtable on Water Financing (OECD, 2022); https://www.oecd.org/water/roundtable-on-financing-water.htm
The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018: Nature-Based Solutions for Water (United Nations World Water Assessment Program/UNESCO, 2018).
Browder, G., Ozment, S., Rehberger-Bescos, I., Gartner, T. & Lange, G. M. Integrating Green and Gray: Creating Next Generation Infrastructure (World Bank and World Resources Institute, 2019); https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31430
Making Every Drop Count: Agenda for Water Action (High Level Panel on Water, United Nations and World Bank, 2018).
Lederer, E. M. Next UN assembly president warns world in dangerous crisis. Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/next-un-assembly-president-warns-world-in-dangerous-crisis/2022/06/07/55075dce-e6b6-11ec-a422-11bbb91db30b_story.html (7 June 2022).
Tapley, B. D. et al. Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 9 , 358–369 (2019).
Wada, Y. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Sustainability of global water use: past reconstruction and future projections. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/104003 (2014).
Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Blue water footprint linked to national consumption and international trade is unsustainable. Nat. Food 1 , 792–800 (2020).
Rodell, M. et al. Emerging trends in global freshwater availability. Nature 557 , 651–659 (2018).
Save, H., Bettadpur, S. & Tapley, B. D. High-resolution CSR GRACE RL05 mascons. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121 , 7547–7569 (2016).
Tapley, B. D., Bettadpur, S., Watkins, M. & Reigber, C. The Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl019920 (2004).
Richey, A. S. et al. Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE. Water Resour. Res. 51 , 5217–5238 (2015).
Shamsudduha, M. & Taylor, R. G. Groundwater storage dynamics in the world’s large aquifer systems from GRACE: uncertainty and role of extreme precipitation. Earth Syst. Dyn. 11 , 755–774 (2020).
Vishwakarma, B. D., Bates, P., Sneeuw, N., Westaway, R. M. & Bamber, J. L. Re-assessing global water storage trends from GRACE time series. Environ. Res. Lett. 16 , 034005 (2021).
Pekel, J. F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N. & Belward, A. S. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540 , 418–436 (2016).
Lehner, B. et al. High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9 , 494–502 (2011).
Scanlon, B. R. et al. Global models underestimate large decadal declining and rising water storage trends relative to GRACE satellite data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115 , E1080–E1089 (2018).
Winter, T. C., Harvey, J. W., Franke, O. L. & Alley, W. M. Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource . Circular 1139 (United States Geological Survey, 1998).
Konikow, L. F. Overestimated water storage. Nat. Geosci. 6 , 3 (2013).
Konikow, L. F. Contribution of global groundwater depletion since 1900 to sea-level rise. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl048604 (2011).
Pokhrel, Y. N. et al. Model estimates of sea-level change due to anthropogenic impacts on terrestrial water storage. Nat. Geosci. 5 , 389–392 (2012).
de Graaf, I. E. M. et al. A global-scale two-layer transient groundwater model: development and application to groundwater depletion. Adv. Water Resour. 102 , 53–67 (2017).
Rateb, A. et al. Comparison of groundwater storage changes from GRACE satellites with monitoring and modeling of major U.S. aquifers. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027556 (2020).
de Graaf, I. E. M., Gleeson, T., van Beek, L. P. H., Sutanudjaja, E. H. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Environmental flow limits to global groundwater pumping. Nature 574 , 90–94 (2019).
Sophocleous, M. From safe yield to sustainable development of water resources — the Kansas experience. J. Hydrol. 235 , 27–43 (2000).
Konikow, L. F. & Bredehoeft, J. D. Groundwater Resource Development: Effects and Sustainability (The Groundwater Project, 2020).
MacAllister, D. J., Krishan, G., Basharat, M., Cuba, D. & MacDonald, A. M. A century of groundwater accumulation in Pakistan and northwest India. Nat. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00926-1 (2022).
Scanlon, B. R. et al. Effects of climate and irrigation on GRACE-based estimates of water storage changes in major US aquifers. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16ff (2021).
McGuire, V. L. Water-Level and Recoverable Water In Storage Changes, High Plains Aquifer, Predevelopment to 2015 and 2013–15 . US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5040 (2017); https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175040
Faunt, C. C. Groundwater availability of the Central Valley Aquifer, California. US Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap . 1766 (2009).
Vorosmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J. & Lammers, R. B. Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289 , 284–288 (2000).
Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500323 (2016).
Vorosmarty, C. J. & Sahagian, D. Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle. Bioscience 50 , 753–765 (2000).
Gronwall, J. & Danert, K. Regarding groundwater and drinking water access through a human rights lens: self-supply as a norm. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020419 (2020).
van Vliet, M. T. H. et al. Global water scarcity including surface water quality and expansions of clean water technologies. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abbfc3 (2021).
Podgorski, J. & Berg, M. Global threat of arsenic in groundwater. Science 368 , 845–850 (2020).
Yapiyev, V., Sagintayev, Z., Inglezakis, V. J., Samarkhanov, K. & Verhoef, A. Essentials of endorheic basins and lakes: a review in the context of current and future water resource management and mitigation activities in Central Asia. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100798 (2017).
Pauloo, R. A., Fogg, G. E., Guo, Z. L. & Harter, T. Anthropogenic basin closure and groundwater salinization (ABCSAL). J. Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125787 (2021).
Cao, T. Z., Han, D. M. & Song, X. F. Past, present, and future of global seawater intrusion research: a bibliometric analysis. J. Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126844 (2021).
Werner, A. D. et al. Seawater intrusion processes, investigation and management: recent advances and future challenges. Adv. Water Resour. 51 , 3–26 (2013).
Held, I. M. & Soden, B. J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19 , 5686–5699 (2006).
Fan, X., Duan, Q. Y., Shen, C. P., Wu, Y. & Xing, C. Global surface air temperatures in CMIP6: historical performance and future changes. Environ. Res. Lett. 15 , 104056 (2020).
Tabari, H. Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70816-2 (2020).
Williams, A. P. et al. Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368 , 314 (2020).
Arias, P. A. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 33−144 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
van Dijk, A. et al. The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001–2009): natural and human causes and implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society. Water Resour. Res. 49 , 1040–1057 (2013).
Scanlon, B. R. et al. Hydrologic implications of GRACE satellite data in the Colorado River Basin. Water Resour. Res. 51 , 9891–9903 (2015).
Rateb, A., Scanlon, B. R. & Kuo, C. Y. Multi-decadal assessment of water budget and hydrological extremes in the Tigris-Euphrates Basin using satellites, modeling, and in-situ data. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144337 (2021).
Anyamba, A., Glennie, E. & Small, J. Teleconnections and interannual transitions as observed in African vegetation: 2015–2017. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071038 (2018).
Scanlon, B. R. et al. Linkages between GRACE water storage, hydrologic extremes, and climate teleconnections in major African aquifers. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3bfc (2022).
Ul Hassan, W. & Nayak, M. A. Global teleconnections in droughts caused by oceanic and atmospheric circulation patterns. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc9e2 (2021).
Shen, Z. X. et al. Drying in the low-latitude Atlantic Ocean contributed to terrestrial water storage depletion across Eurasia. Nat. Commun. 13 , 1849 (2022).
Dettinger, M. D. Atmospheric rivers as drought busters on the US West Coast. J. Hydrometeorol. 14 , 1721–1732 (2013).
Taylor, R. G. et al. Ground water and climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3 , 322–329 (2013).
Cuthbert, M. O. et al. Observed controls on resilience of groundwater to climate variability in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature 572 , 230 (2019).
Hugonnet, R. et al. Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the early twenty-first century. Nature 592 , 726 (2021).
Zhao, F., Long, D., Li, X., Huang, Q. & Han, P. Rapid glacier mass loss in the Southeastern Tibetan Plateau since the year 2000 from satellite observations. Remote. Sens. Environ. 270 , 112853 (2022).
Li, X. Y. et al. Climate change threatens terrestrial water storage over the Tibetan Plateau. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01443-0 (2022).
Yao, T. D. et al. The imbalance of the Asian water tower. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00299-4 (2022).
Immerzeel, W. W., van Beek, L. P. H. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science 328 , 1382–1385 (2010).
Immerzeel, W. W. et al. Importance and vulnerability of the world’s water towers. Nature 577 , 364 (2020).
Dery, S. J. et al. Detection of runoff timing changes in pluvial, nival, and glacial rivers of western Canada. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr006975 (2009).
Siebert, S. et al. Groundwater use for irrigation – a global inventory. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 7 , 3977–4021 (2010).
Google Scholar
Scanlon, B. R. et al. Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109 , 9320–9325 (2012).
Dahlke, H. E. et al. in Advanced Tools for Integrated Water Resources Management Vol. 3 (eds Friesen, J. & Rodriguez-Sinobas, L.) 215–275 (Elsevier, 2018).
Reddy, V. R., Pavelic, P. & Hanjra, M. A. Underground taming of floods for irrigation (UTFI) in the river basins of South Asia: institutionalising approaches and policies for sustainable water management and livelihood enhancement. Water Policy 20 , 369–387 (2018).
McDonald, R. I., Weber, K. F., Padowski, J., Boucher, T. & Shemie, D. Estimating watershed degradation over the last century and its impact on water-treatment costs for the world’s large cities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113 , 9117–9122 (2016).
The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, Biodiversity, and Peopl e (FAO/UNEP, 2020).
Convention on Wetlands. Global Wetland Outlook: Special Edition 2021 (Secretariat of the Convention on Wetlands, 2021).
Scanlon, B. R., Jolly, I., Sophocleous, M. & Zhang, L. Global impacts of conversions from natural to agricultural ecosystems on water resources: quantity versus quality. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005486 (2007).
Nosetto, M. D., Paez, R. A., Ballesteros, S. I. & Jobbagy, E. G. Higher water-table levels and flooding risk under grain vs. livestock production systems in the subhumid plains of the Pampas. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 206 , 60–70 (2015).
Favreau, G. et al. Land clearing, climate variability, and water resources increase in semiarid southwest Niger: a review. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006785 (2009).
Walker, C. D., Zhang, l, Ellis, T. W., Hatton, T. J. & Petheram, C. Estimating impacts of changed land use on recharge: review of modelling and other approaches appropriate for management of dryland salinity. Hydrogeol. J. 10 , 68–90 (2002).
Nosetto, M. D., Jobbagy, E. G., Jackson, R. B. & Sznaider, G. A. Reciprocal influence of crops and shallow ground water in sandy landscapes of the Inland Pampas. Field Crops Res. 113 , 138–148 (2009).
Gimenez, R., Mercau, J., Nosetto, M., Paez, R. & Jobbagy, E. The ecohydrological imprint of deforestation in the semiarid Chaco: insights from the last forest remnants of a highly cultivated landscape. Hydrol. Process. 30 , 2603–2616 (2016).
Eilers, R. G., Eilers, W. D. & Fitzgerald, M. M. A salinity risk index for soils of the Canadian prairies. Hydrogeol. J. 5 , 68–79 (1997).
Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2000–2020: Five Years into the SDGs (WHO/UNICEF, 2021).
Cobbing, J. & Hiller, B. Waking a sleeping giant: realizing the potential of groundwater in sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev. 122 , 597–613 (2019).
Rockström, J. & Falkenmark, M. Agriculture: increase water harvesting in Africa. Nature 519 , 283–285 (2015).
MacAllister, D. J., MacDonald, A. M., Kebede, S., Godfrey, S. & Calow, R. Comparative performance of rural water supplies during drought. Nat. Commun. 11 , 1099 (2020).
Aboah, M. & Miyittah, M. K. Estimating global water, sanitation, and hygiene levels and related risks on human health, using global indicators data from 1990 to 2020. J. Water Health 20 , 1091–1101 (2022).
Abell, R. et al. Beyond the Source: The Environmental, Economic and Community Benefits of Source Water Protection (The Nature Conservancy, 2017).
Herrera-Garcia, G. et al. Mapping the global threat of land subsidence. Science 371 , 34–36 (2021).
Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Faunt, C. C., Pool, D. & Uhlman, K. Enhancing drought resilience with conjunctive use and managed aquifer recharge in California and Arizona. Environ. Res. Lett. 11 , 035013 (2016).
Qadir, M. et al. Global and regional potential of wastewater as a water, nutrient and energy source. Nat. Resour. Forum 44 , 40–51 (2020).
Water Reuse within a Circular Economy Context . Global Water Security Issues Series 2 (UNESCO, 2020).
Jones, E. R., van Vliet, M. T. H., Qadir, M. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Country-level and gridded estimates of wastewater production, collection, treatment and reuse. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13 , 237–254 (2021).
Jeuland, M. Challenges to wastewater reuse in the Middle East and North Africa. Middle East. Dev. J. 7 , 1–25 (2015).
Zhang, Y. & Shen, Y. Wastewater irrigation: past, present, and future. WIREs Water 6 , e1234 (2019).
Fito, J. & Van Hulle, S. W. H. Wastewater reclamation and reuse potentials in agriculture: towards environmental sustainability. Environ. Dev. Sust. 23 , 2949–2972 (2021).
Gao, L., Yoshikawa, S., Iseri, Y., Fujimori, S. & Kanae, S. An economic assessment of the global potential for seawater desalination to 2050. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100763 (2017).
Ahdab, Y. D., Thiel, G. P., Bohlke, J. K., Stanton, J. & Lienhard, J. H. Minimum energy requirements for desalination of brackish groundwater in the United States with comparison to international datasets. Water Res. 141 , 387–404 (2018).
Jones, E., Qadir, M., van Vliet, M. T. H., Smakhtin, V. & Kang, S. M. The state of desalination and brine production: a global outlook. Sci. Total Environ. 657 , 1343–1356 (2019).
Lin, S. S. et al. Seawater desalination technology and engineering in China: a review. Desalination https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114728 (2021).
Martinez-Alvarez, V., Martin-Gorriz, B. & Soto-Garcia, M. Seawater desalination for crop irrigation — a review of current experiences and revealed key issues. Desalination 381 , 58–70 (2016).
Smith, K., Liu, S. M., Hu, H. Y., Dong, X. & Wen, X. H. Water and energy recovery: the future of wastewater in China. Sci. Total Environ. 637 , 1466–1470 (2018).
Pulido-Bosch, A. et al. Impacts of agricultural irrigation on groundwater salinity. Environ/ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7386-6 (2018).
Kurnik, J. The Next California: Phase 1: Investigating Potential in the Mid-Mississippi Delta River Region (The Markets Institute at WWF, 2020); https://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/the-next-california-phase-1-investigating-potential-in-the-mid-mississippi-delta-river-region
Senay, G. B., Schauer, M., Friedrichs, M., Velpuri, N. M. & Singh, R. K. Satellite-based water use dynamics using historical Landsat data (1984–2014) in the southwestern United States. Remote Sens. Environ. 202 , 98–112 (2017).
Gebremichael, M., Krishnamurthy, P. K., Ghebremichael, L. T. & Alam, S. What drives crop land use change during multi-year droughts in California’s Central Valley? Prices or concern for water? Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040650 (2021).
Brauman, K. A., Siebert, S. & Foley, J. A. Improvements in crop water productivity increase water sustainability and food security — a global analysis. Environ. Res. Lett. 8 , 024030 (2013).
Mekonnen, M. M., Hoekstra, A. Y., Neale, C. M. U., Ray, C. & Yang, H. S. Water productivity benchmarks: the case of maize and soybean in Nebraska. Agric. Water Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106122 (2020).
Colaizzi, P. D., Gowda, P. H., Marek, T. H. & Porter, D. O. Irrigation in the Texas High Plains: a brief history and potential reductions in demand. Irrig. Drain. 58 , 257–274 (2008).
Scanlon, B. R., Gates, J. B., Reedy, R. C., Jackson, A. & Bordovsky, J. Effects of irrigated agroecosystems: (2). Quality of soil water and groundwater in the southern High Plains, Texas. Water Resour. Res. 46 , W09538 (2010).
Ward, F. A. & Pulido-Velazquez, M. Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 , 18215–18220 (2008).
Grafton, R. Q. et al. The paradox of irrigation efficiency. Science 361 , 748–750 (2018).
Alcott, B. in The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements (eds Polimeni, J. M., Mayumi, K., & Giampetro, M.) 7–78 (Earthscan, 2008).
Aarnoudse, E. & Bluemling, B. Controlling Groundwater Through Smart Card Machines: The Case of Water Quotas and Pricing Mechanisms in Gansu Province, China . Groundwater Solutions Initiative for Policy and Practice (GRIPP) Case Profile Series 02 (International Water Management Institute, 2017); https://doi.org/10.5337/2016.224
Kinzelbach, W., Wang, H., Li, Y., Wang, L. & Li, N. Groundwater Overexploitation in the North China Plain: A Path to Sustainability (Springer, 2021).
McDougall, R., Kristiansen, P. & Rader, R. Small-scale urban agriculture results in high yields but requires judicious management of inputs to achieve sustainability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116 , 129–134 (2019).
Langemeyer, J., Madrid-Lopez, C., Mendoza Beltran, A. & Villalba Mendez, G. Urban agriculture — a necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability? Landsc. Urban Plan. 210 , 104055 (2021).
Palmer, L. Urban agriculture growth in US cities. Nat. Sust. 1 , 5–7 (2018).
Grafius, D. R. et al. Estimating food production in an urban landscape. Sci. Rep. 10 , 5141 (2020).
The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015 (FAO/IFAD/WFP, 2015).
Kummu, M. et al. Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Sci. Total Environ. 438 , 477–489 (2012).
Gleick, P. H. Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science 302 , 1524–1528 (2003).
Miralles-Wilhelm, F. Nature-Based Solutions in Agriculture — Sustainable Management and Conservation of Land, Water, and Biodiversity (FAO/The Nature Conservancy, 2021).
McDonald, R. I. & Shemie, D. Urban Water Blueprint: Mapping Conservation Solutions to the Global Water Challenge (The Nature Conservancy, 2014); http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint
Kane, M. & Erickson, J. D. Urban metabolism and payment for ecosystem services: history and policy analysis of the New York city water supply. Adv. Econ. Environ. Resour. 7 , 307–328 (2007).
Greater Cape Town Water Fund: Business Case: Assessing the Return on Investment for Ecological Infrastructure Restoration (The Nature Conservancy, 2019).
Hu, J., Lu, Y. H., Fu, B. J., Comber, A. J. & Harris, P. Quantifying the effect of ecological restoration on runoff and sediment yields: a meta-analysis for the Loess Plateau of China. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 41 , 753–774 (2017).
Liu, W. W. et al. Improving wetland ecosystem health in China. Ecol. Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106184 (2020).
Cities100: Chennai Is Restoring Waterbodies to Protect Against Flooding and Drought . C40 Knowledge Hub: Nordic Sustainability, South and West Asia, Chennai, Case Studies and Best Practice Examples https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/Cities100-Chennai-is-restoring-waterbodies-to-protect-against-flooding-and-drought?language=en_US (2019).
Chung, M. G., Frank, K. A., Pokhrel, Y., Dietz, T. & Liu, J. G. Natural infrastructure in sustaining global urban freshwater ecosystem services. Nat. Sust. 4 , 1068 (2021).
Qi, Y. F. et al. Addressing challenges of urban water management in Chinese sponge cities via nature-based solutions. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102788 (2020).
Acreman, M. et al. Evidence for the effectiveness of nature-based solutions to water issues in Africa. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0210 (2021).
Livneh, B. & Badger, A. M. Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nat. Clim. Change 10 , 452–458 (2020).
Mulligan, M., van Soesbergen, A. & Sáenz, L. GOODD, a global dataset of more than 38,000 georeferenced dams. Sci. Data 7 , 31 (2020).
International Commission on Large Dams https://www.icold-cigb.org/ (2022).
Yang, G., Guo, S., Liu, P. & Block, P. Integration and evaluation of forecast-informed multiobjective reservoir operations. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 146 , 04020038 (2020).
Delaney, C. J. et al. Forecast informed reservoir operations using ensemble streamflow predictions for a multipurpose reservoir in northern California. Water Resour. Res . https://doi.org/10.1029/2019wr026604 (2020).
Amarasinghe, U. A., Muthuwatta, L., Surinaidu, L., Anand, S. & Jain, S. K. Reviving the Ganges water machine: potential. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20 , 1085–1101 (2016).
Shamsudduha, M. et al. The Bengal water machine: quantified freshwater capture in Bangladesh. Science 377 , 1315–1319 (2022).
Chao, B. F., Wu, Y. H. & Li, Y. S. Impact of artificial reservoir water impoundment on global sea level. Science 320 , 212–214 (2008).
Zarfl, C., Lumsdon, A. E., Berlekamp, J., Tydecks, L. & Tockner, K. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquat. Sci. 77 , 161–170 (2015).
Zarfl, C. et al. Future large hydropower dams impact global freshwater megafauna. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54980-8 (2019).
Wheeler, K. G., Jeuland, M., Hall, J. W., Zagona, E. & Whittington, D. Understanding and managing new risks on the Nile with the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19089-x (2020).
Di Baldassarre, G. et al. Water shortages worsened by reservoir effects. Nat. Sust. 1 , 617–622 (2018).
Dahlke, H. E., Brown, A. G., Orloff, S., Putnam, D. & O’Geen, T. Managed winter flooding of alfalfa recharges groundwater with minimal crop damage. Calif. Agric. 72 , 65–75 (2018).
Yang, Q. & Scanlon, B. R. How much water can be captured from flood flows to store in depleted aquifers for mitigating floods and droughts? A case study from Texas, US. Environ. Res. Lett. 14 , 054011 (2019).
Dillon, P. et al. Sixty years of global progress in managed aquifer recharge. Hydrogeol. J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1841-z. (2018).
Groundwater Replenishment System Technical Brochure, https://www.ocwd.com/media/10443/gwrs-technical-brochure-2021.pdf (2021).
Konikow, L. F. Groundwater Depletion in the United States (1900–2008) . US Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report 2013–5079, http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2013/5079 (2013).
Hartog, N. & Stuyfzand, P. J. Water quality donsiderations on the rise as the use of managed aquifer recharge systems widens. Water 9 , 808 (2017).
Shumilova, O., Tockner, K., Thieme, M., Koska, A. & Zarfl, C. Global water transfer megaprojects: a potential solution for the water–food–energy nexus? Front. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00150 (2018).
Long, D. et al. South-to-north water diversion stabilizing Beijing’s groundwater levels. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17428-6 (2020).
Zhuang, W. Eco-environmental impact of inter-basin water transfer projects: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23 , 12867–12879 (2016).
Hoekstra, A. Y. Virtual Water Trade : Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade (UNESCO-IHE, 2003).
Oki, T. & Kanae, S. Virtual water trade and world water resources. Water Sci. Technol. 49 , 203–209 (2004).
Dolan, F. et al. Evaluating the economic impact of water scarcity in a changing world. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22194-0 (2021).
Hoekstra, A. Y. & Mekonnen, M. M. The water footprint of humanity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109 , 3232–3237 (2012).
Dalin, C., Wada, Y., Kastner, T. & Puma, M. J. Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 543 , 700–704 (2017).
Hanasaki, N., Inuzuka, T., Kanae, S. & Oki, T. An estimation of global virtual water flow and sources of water withdrawal for major crops and livestock products using a global hydrological model. J. Hydrol. 384 , 232–244 (2010).
Mekonnen, M. M. & Gerbens-Leenes, W. The water footprint of global food production. Water https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102696 (2020).
Australian Water Markets Report: 2019-20 Review and 2020-21 Outlook (Aither, 2020); https://aither.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-Water-Markets-Report.pdf
Grafton, R. Q. & Wheeler, S. A. Economics of water recovery in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 10 , 487–510 (2018).
Moench, M. Water and the potential for social instability: livelihoods, migration and the building of society. Nat. Resour. Forum 26 , 195–204 (2002).
Water Markets in Australia: A Short History (National Water Commission, 2011).
Kundzewicz, Z. W. & Döll, P. Will groundwater ease freshwater stress under climate change? Hydrol. Sci. J. 54 , 665–675 (2009).
A Snapshot of the World’s Water Quality: Towards a Global Assessment (UNEP, 2016).
Summary Progress Update 2021: SDG 6 — Water and Sanitation for All (UN-Water, 2021).
GEMStat: Global Environmental Monitoring System, https://gemstat.org/ (UNEP, 2022).
Akhmouch, A. & Correia, F. N. The 12 OECD principles on water governance — when science meets policy. Util. Policy 43 , 14–20 (2016).
Lankford, B., Bakker, K., Zeitoun, M. & Conway, B. D. Water Security: Principles, Perspectives, and Practices (Routledge, 2013).
Potapov, P. et al. Global maps of cropland extent and change show accelerated cropland expansion in the twenty-first century. Nat. Food 3 , 19 (2022).
Fan, Y., Li, H. & Miguez-Macho, G. Global patterns of groundwater table depth. Science 339 , 940–943 (2013).
Download references
Author information
Authors and affiliations.
Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Bridget R. Scanlon, Sarah Fakhreddine, Ashraf Rateb, Robert C. Reedy & Alex Sun
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Sarah Fakhreddine
Water Systems and Global Change, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Inge de Graaf
Global Institute for Water Security, National Hydrology Research Center, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Jay Famiglietti
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Tom Gleeson
Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
R. Quentin Grafton
Grupo de Estudios Ambientales, IMASL, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, San Luis, Argentina
Esteban Jobbagy
Center for Water Resources Research, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
Seifu Kebede
UK Meteorological Office, Exeter, UK
Seshagiri Rao Kolusu
Leonard Konikow Hydrogeologist, Reston, VA, USA
Leonard F. Konikow
Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
Mesfin Mekonnen
Institute of Physical Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
Hannes Müller Schmied
Senckenberg Leibniz Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India
Abhijit Mukherjee
British Geological Survey, Lyell Centre, Edinburgh, UK
Alan MacDonald
Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, University College London, London, UK
Mohammad Shamsudduha
National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training (NCGRT), College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Craig T. Simmons
Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK
Richard G. Taylor
Water Cycle Innovation Ltd, Johannesburg, Gauten, South Africa
Karen G. Villholth
Environmental Sciences Initiative, Advanced Science Research Center at the CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA
Charles J. Vörösmarty
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
Chunmiao Zheng
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
B.R.S. conceptualized the review and coordinated input. S.F. reviewed many of the topics and developed some of the figures. A.R. analysed GRACE satellite data and M.S. reviewed this output. Q.G. provided input on water economics. E.J. reviewed impacts of land-use change. S.R.K. provided data on future precipitation changes. L.F.K. provided detailed information on surface water/groundwater interactions. M.M. provided data on water trade. C.J.V. provided input on green and grey solutions. All authors reviewed the paper and provided edits.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Bridget R. Scanlon .
Ethics declarations
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information.
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment thanks Helen Dahlke, Diana Allen, who co-reviewed with Aspen Anderson, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information, supplementary tables , rights and permissions.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Cite this article.
Scanlon, B.R., Fakhreddine, S., Rateb, A. et al. Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4 , 87–101 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00378-6
Download citation
Accepted : 17 November 2022
Published : 31 January 2023
Issue Date : February 2023
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00378-6
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
This article is cited by
Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally.
- Scott Jasechko
- Hansjörg Seybold
- James W. Kirchner
Nature (2024)
Winter snow deficit was a harbinger of summer 2022 socio-hydrologic drought in the Po Basin, Italy
- Francesco Avanzi
- Francesca Munerol
- Luca Ferraris
Communications Earth & Environment (2024)
Moving from fit to fitness for governing water in the Anthropocene
- Michele-Lee Moore
- Lan Wang-Erlandsson
- Shuchi Vora
Nature Water (2024)
Preparation of polysulfone-based nanofiber Janus membrane for membrane distillation containing organic pollutants
- Shaoqi Zhou
npj Clean Water (2024)
Multi-decadal groundwater observations reveal surprisingly stable levels in southwestern Europe
- Rafael Chávez García Silva
- Robert Reinecke
- Seifeddine Jomaa
Quick links
- Explore articles by subject
- Guide to authors
- Editorial policies
Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.
![research papers groundwater research papers groundwater](https://verify.nature.com/verify/nature.png)
You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
COMMENTS
Groundwater is the leading international journal focused exclusively on groundwater. Founded in 1963, it publishes a dynamic mix of papers on topics including groundwater flow and well hydraulics, hydrogeochemistry and contaminant hydrogeology, application of geophysics, groundwater management and policy, and history of groundwater hydrology.
Groundwater consists. both of water that remains in the unsaturated or. vadose zone (also often termed "soil water") and. of water that reaches the saturated zone (aquifer) where pore spaces ...
1. Introduction. Groundwater is the largest freshwater store on earth, its use underpins a huge range of human activities as well as important ecosystems (Margat and Van der Gun, 2013; Rohde et al., 2017).Historically, groundwater quantity has often been the focus of groundwater resource assessments, and there is a real need to now focus more attention towards groundwater quality.
There is much ongoing research on groundwater in LKHRs, and it needs to further expand and accelerate in support of global groundwater modeling needs. Of particular importance is the nature of the hydrogeologic transition from the uplands to the lowlands which is commonly referred to as the "mountain front" (Wilson & Guan, 2004).
Quality of life is associated with quality of water we consume. Out of all water resource, groundwater is one of the important drinking water resources 1,2.In the arid and semi-arid regions ...
Here we analyse in situ groundwater-level trends for 170,000 monitoring wells and 1,693 aquifer systems in countries that encompass approximately 75% of global groundwater withdrawals 18. We show ...
Groundwater, the vast water reserve beneath Earth's surface 1, is an essential resource for humans and ecosystems.Globally, more than one-third of the water used originates from underground 2.In ...
Principal areas covered by the proposed journal are: • Hydrogeological systems and sustainable groundwater resources management. • Groundwater contamination and protection. • Groundwater vulnerability and risk assessment. • Groundwater quality and food safety. • Epidemiology and public health impacts of groundwater contamination.
Global groundwater withdrawals were estimated to have exceeded 900 km 3 /year by 2010, with water wells and springheads providing some 36% of potable water supply (60). Groundwater, the world's largest distributed store of fresh water, is naturally well placed to play a vital role in enabling societies to adapt to intermittent and sustained water shortages caused by climate change.
Groundwater is an essential resource for man's survival and is imperative for public health [1].Statistically, groundwater constitutes 97% of the global freshwater and is a major drinking water source and a critical resort for water resources for domestic and public use [[2], [5]].Besides, it is a precious resource in arid areas due to erratic rainfall and limited surface water resources [3].
Groundwater® is the leading international journal focused exclusively on groundwater.Since 1963, Groundwater has published a dynamic mix of papers on topics related to groundwater including groundwater flow and well hydraulics, hydrogeochemistry and contaminant hydrogeology, application of geophysics, groundwater management and policy, and history of groundwater hydrology.
The paper concluded by recommending research into quantifying groundwater, its quality and treatment based on the above overview. Drinking water quality. Taste threshold for major cations.
Groundwater contamination is a global problem that has a significant impact on human health and ecological services. Studies reported in this special issue focus on contaminants in groundwater of geogenic and anthropogenic origin distributed over a wide geographic range, with contributions from researchers studying groundwater contamination in India, China, Pakistan, Turkey, Ethiopia, and ...
This perspective paper by the Friends of Groundwater (FoG) group aims to give a compelling argument for the importance of groundwater quality for human development and ecosystem health. It also provides a global overview of the current knowledge, with focus on data coverage, gaps and technological advances.
Groundwater recharge is a technique by which infiltrated water passes through the unsaturated region of groundwater and joins the water table. It is based upon soil type, land use land cover ...
Groundwater is the most abundant freshwater resource available on earth, and it accounts for more than 95% of all liquid freshwater [1,2].This freshwater resource is important for coastal areas where it is commonly regarded as the center of social and economic development because the availability of water resources constrains socio-economic development in these areas [].
Groundwater is an important source for drinking water supply in hard rock terrain of Bundelkhand massif particularly in District Mahoba, Uttar Pradesh, India. An attempt has been made in this work to understand the suitability of groundwater for human consumption. The parameters like pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, alkalinity, total hardness, calcium, magnesium, sodium ...
Getting to Wiley Online Library takes just three, easy steps: 1. Click "Log In" in the upper right corner. 2. Type in your email address and password. 3. Click the option below of your choice: Read Groundwater on Wiley Online Library. Read Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation on Wiley Online Library.
Always submit the image at its final size. For Groundwater, that is 8.25 cm wide for one-column art and 17.15 cm wide for two-column art. Generate the image at line screens of 85 lines per inch (lpi) or lower. When applying multiple shades of gray, differentiate the gray levels by at least 20 percent.
Groundwater comprises 95% of the liquid fresh water on Earth and contains a diverse mix of dissolved organic matter (DOM) molecules which play a significant role in the global carbon cycle.
Despite the study's finding that 21% of groundwater-dependent ecosystems are under some level of protection, Rohde's past research has shown that very few of these ecosystems are effectively protected even where such legislation exists.
The result is a global map of where ecosystems dependent on groundwater existed from 2015-2020, combined with a statistical likelihood of the researchers' confidence in each location's groundwater dependence. "A few years ago, an analysis like this would not have been possible, but we can now leverage recent advances in machine learning and cloud computing to fill critical knowledge gaps ...
This review paper is organized into five sections: (1) a review of the global climate change; (2) an assessment of the present state of climate change impact on groundwater components; (3) a review of groundwater models and climate change induced future groundwater changes; (4) groundwater feedbacks to the climate system; and (5) key ...
Call for more integrated research. The group of authors, consisting of experts in mountain hydrology, glaciology, hydrogeology, snow hydrology, water chemistry, and socio-hydrology, emphasizes ...
New research identifies ecosystems around the world that could be threatened by declining groundwater levels. The research, published July 17 in Nature, is the first time that groundwater-dependent ecosystems have been mapped on a global scale. Led by scientists from The Nature Conservancy and DRI, the global effort brought researchers together from universities, non-profit organizations, and ...
Analyzing polar motion across 12 decades, scientists attributed nearly all of the periodic oscillations in the axis' position to changes in groundwater, ice sheets, glaciers, and sea levels. According to a paper published recently in Nature Geoscience, the mass variations during the 20th century mostly resulted from natural climate cycles.
On the new map, the American West stands out as particularly reliant on a network of underground water sources — like the hidden water that honeycombs the land around and to the south of Utah ...
Module: Assessment of groundwater quality. Milligram per liter (mg/l) parts per million (ppm) (Ayers & Westcot 1985) Mill equ ival ent per lite r (m e/l) = m g/l ÷ eq uiva lent we ight (Aye rs ...
National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training (NCGRT), College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia ... All authors reviewed the paper and ...
In this report, as part of a joint project with the IISS, researchers from the Center for Foreign Policy and Peace Research explore this process and the issues lying ahead. Turkiye's defence industry has undergone dramatic changes over the last 50 years and the country has become a significant defence exporter. In this report, as part of a ...