essay about interconnectedness of religion culture and geography brainly

MyInfoBasket.com

Free Quality Online Learning Materials

Pagkilala sa Pambihirang Pagkakakilanlan ng Lahing Pilipino
Alab ng Kultura: Mga Musika at Sayaw ng Lahi na Pambihirang Ipinagmamalaki ng mga Pilipino
Tunay na mga Biyaya: Mga Kawanggawa sa Pamayanan na Bunga ng Pananampalataya
The Last Words of Jose Rizal: An Insight into the Final Moments of the National Hero
Who was Jose Rizal? Discover the Life and Legacy of Jose Protacio Rizal Mercado y Alonso Realonda

selective focus photo of brown dreamcatcher

The Interconnectedness of Geography, Culture and Religions

In this essay that is based on the lecture by Professor Jens Micah De Guzman, we will analyze the interconnectedness of geography, culture and religions.

We can prove that geography, religion, and culture are practically interrelated. Geography influences religion, and religion, in turn, affects culture.

How does geography influence religion?

It is a common knowledge that civilizations ordinarily develop in and around river systems where there are easy access to water, food sources, and irrigation systems. This geographical state permits people to grow crops and thus shift from the hunter gatherer lifestyle to becoming agriculturist—farming and domesticating livestock.

The Ganges, Indus Valley, the Nile, and Amazon River are geographical regions where various kinds of people have developed over time. Dissimilarities in culture result in diverse religious inclinations which incorporate their environments into their rituals, mythologies, and iconography. This partially explains the rise of various religions in these places.

The origin of some features within a religion can also be explained by geography. For instance, shrines in Shintoism have been built for reasons that include geography (e.g. mountain shrines). Every shrine typically has a “kami” (god), which may be a natural or topographical feature. The “kami” is said to normally reside in an object, such as a stone. (Read: What is Kami in Shintoism (and the Importance of Worshiping these)

Many examples also prove that the physical environment of a place or geography elucidates many aspects of the religions in it:

“Across many of the world’s religions, mountains have been associated with talking to God or as the abode of a god. Mount Sinai was the place where God talked to Moses and the Jews. The Mount of Olives was where Jesus ascended into heaven and where he is supposed to return. Mt. Athos in Greece as an ancient monastery where monks dedicate their lives to living in seclusion devoted to God.’

“Olympus was the home of the ancient Greek pantheon and Mt. Fuji was the dwelling place of gods in Japan. Man even built artificial mountains in an attempt to reach the divine in the form of pyramids, ziggarats, and mounds.” (“Geography and Religion,” n.d.)

Aside from mountains, trees and rocks also had religious significance. The Stonehenge and Easter Island serve as examples from ethnic religions of the past. The “Wailing Wall” in Jerusalem called the ‘Kotel,’ being the last vestiges of the Second Temple, is a modern example.

On the other hand, tress were used to produce totems, that is, objects (such as an animal or plant) that are believed by a particular culture to have spiritual significance and that are adopted by it as emblems. In fact, it is said that the Catholic and other Protestant sects’ ‘Christmas tree’ has its origin from that paganistic treatment of trees.

Likewise, geographical properties such as rivers, water, and desert were given religious meaning. The Ganges Rivers is seen as sacred until today by the Hindus while the Nile River was deemed sacred in ancient Egyptian religion.

We can also see that water is employed as a means of purification in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, such as in the practice of baptism. The desert, on the other hand, is customarily regarded as a means of spiritual refinement, such as in the practice of meditation and ascetism.

How does religion affect culture?

Religion significantly impacts culture as it affects and influences it in many vital ways. It can be proved that religion can considerably define the values, ideas, beliefs, heritage, and lifestyle of a society; all of which are essential constituents of culture.

For instance, relationships, marriage, birth, death, homemaking, and farming are usual events in cultures—and these normally have a religious significance.

Religion can have an enormous impact on people’s culture especially when those in a certain culture believe intensely in its religion. Their culture appears to accept only those ways of thinking and conducts which are acceptable to their religion.

Before, European societies’ were zealous Catholics. This had great effects on European culture at the time as most cultural expressions were church-related. Most arts were religious and much of the music produced were as well religious in genre.

In fact, European cultures, especially in the Middle Age, valued religion to the point that people were eager to dedicate major resources to things like building basilicas and supporting monasteries.

Moreover, territories that are strongly affected by Islam have developed cultures that are dominated by men, and in which things such as socializing with members of the opposite sex in public are frowned upon. This, too, reveals the interplay between religion and culture.

It can be noticed that Muslims may be Arabs, Turks, Persians, Indians, Pakistanis, Malaysians, Indonesians, Europeans, Africans, Americans, Chinese, or other nationalities. And yet, their Islamic faith almost homogeneously influences their view on customs, attire, diets, celebrations, places of worship, politics, and other aspects of life.

Religion remarkably influences various cultures in various ways. Amazingly too, religion can affect the same culture in different ways at different times. For more information about the topic, read Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: A Comparative Analysis and Hinduism, Theravada Buddhism, and Mahayana Buddhism: Similarities and Differences .

For more free lectures like this, visit Homepage: Introduction to World Religions and Belief Systems

* Looking for any topic? Search here:

Also Check Out: The Worldview of Atheism by Jensen DG. Mañebog

3.4 Geography of World Religions

Origins and diffusion of world religions.

Our world’s cultural geography is very complex with language and religion as two cultural traits that contribute to the richness, diversity, and complexity of the human experience. Nowadays, the word “diversity” is gaining a great deal of attention, as nations around the world are becoming more culturally, religiously, and linguistically complex and interconnected. Specifically, in regards to religion, these prestigious cultural institutions are no longer isolated in their place of origin, but have diffused into other realms and regions with their religious history and cultural dominance. In some parts of the world, this has caused religious wars and persecution; in other regions, it has helped initiate cultural tolerance and respect for others.

These trends are, in some ways, the product of a history of migratory push and pull factors along with a demographic change that have brought together peoples of diverse religious and even linguistic backgrounds. It is critical that people critically learn about diverse cultures by understanding important cultural traits, such as the ways we communicate and maintain spiritual beliefs. Geographers need to be aware that even though our discipline might not be able to answer numerous questions related to language structure or address unique aspects of theological opinion, our field can provide insight by studying these cultural traits in a spatial context. In essence, geography provides us with the necessary tools to understand the spread of cultural traits and the role of geographic factors, both physical and cultural, in that process. People will then see that geography has influenced the distribution and diffusion of differing ideologies, as well as the diverse ways they practice their spiritual traditions.

As is the case with languages, geographers have a method of classifying religions so people can better understand the geographic diffusion of belief systems. Although religions are by themselves complex cultural institutions, the primary method for categorizing them is simple. In essence, there are two main groups: universalizing religions, which actively invite non-members to join them, and ethnic religions, which are associated with particular ethnic or national groups. Everyone can recount moments in his or her life in which there was interaction with individuals eager to share with others their spiritual beliefs and traditions. Also, that same person might have encountered individuals who are very private, perhaps secretive, when it comes to personal religious traditions deemed by this individual as exclusive to his or her family and the national group. A discussion of these life experiences can generate fascinating examples that serve as testimony to our world’s cultural richness when it comes to different religious traditions.

Origins of World Religions

A significant portion of the world’s universalizing religions has a precise hearth or place of origin. This designation is based on events in the life of a man, and the hearths where the largest universalizing religions originated are all in Asia. Of course, not all religions are from Asia. The three universalizing religions diffused from specific hearths, or places of origin, to other regions of the world. The hearths where each of these three largest universalizing religions originated are based on the events in the lives of key individuals within each religion. Together, Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism have over 2.5 billion adherents combined. Below are links to websites that analyze the diffusion of Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism.

Religious Conflict

Religion is often the catalyst of conflict between local values or traditions with issues and values that come with nationalism or even globalization. Religion tends to represent core beliefs that represent cultural values and identity, which, along with language, often represent local ideology rather than national or international ideology. There are some reasons why, but some include:

Culture is often the manifestation of core belief systems determined by the interplay between language and religion.
Universal religions try to appeal to the many, whereas ethnic religions focus on the few in a specific region.
Cultural landscapes or language and religion are often represented in the physical landscape. When opposing forces come and threaten the physical landscape, it threatens the cultural landscape.
Universal religions require the adoption of values that make conflict with local traditions and values. If the universal religion is forced upon another universal religion or ethnic religion, conflict may ensue.
Migrants tend to learn and simulate the language of the region they migrate to, but keep the religion they originated from. This can be viewed as a threat to the people the migrant moved to.

Types of World Religions

The major religions of the world (Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Confucianism, Christianity, Taoism, and Judaism) differ in many respects, including how each religion is organized and the belief system each upholds. Other differences include the nature of belief in a higher power, the history of how the world and the religion began, and the use of sacred texts and objects.

Religious Organizations

Religions organize themselves – their institutions, practitioners, and structures – in a variety of fashions. For instance, when the Roman Catholic Church emerged, it borrowed many of its organizational principles from the ancient Roman military and turned senators into cardinals, for example. Human geographers and sociologists use different terms, like ecclesia, denomination, and sect, to define these types of organizations. Scholars are also aware that these definitions are not static. Most religions transition through different organizational phases. For example, Christianity began as a cult, transformed into a sect, and today exists as an ecclesia.

Cults , like sects, are new religious groups. In the United States today this term often carries pejorative connotations. However, almost all religions began as cults and gradually progressed to levels of greater size and organization. The term cult is sometimes used interchangeably with the term new religious movement (NRM). In its pejorative use, these groups are often disparaged as being secretive, highly controlling of members’ lives, and dominated by a single, charismatic leader.

A sect is a small and relatively new group. Most of the well-known Christian denominations in the United States today began as sects. For example, the Methodists and Baptists protested against their parent Anglican Church in England, just as Henry VIII protested against the Catholic Church by forming the Anglican Church. From “protest” comes the term Protestant.

Occasionally, a sect is a breakaway group that may be in tension with the larger society. They sometimes claim to be returning to “the fundamentals” or to contest the veracity of a particular doctrine. When membership in a sect increases over time, it may grow into a denomination. Often a sect begins as an offshoot of a denomination, when a group of members believes they should separate from the larger group.

Some sects dissolve without growing into denominations. Social scientitsts call these established sects . Established sects, such as the Amish or Jehovah’s Witnesses fall halfway between sect and denomination on the ecclesia–cult continuum because they have a mixture of sect-like and denomination-like characteristics.

A denomination is a large, mainstream religious organization, but it does not claim to be official or state-sponsored. It is one religion among many. For example, Baptist, African Methodist Episcopal, Catholic, and Seventh-day Adventist are all Christian denominations.

The term ecclesia , initially referring to a political assembly of citizens in ancient Athens, Greece, now refers to a congregation. In geography, the term is used to refer to a religious group that most all members of a society belong to. It is considered a nationally recognized, or official religion that holds a religious monopoly and is closely allied with state and secular powers. The United States does not have an ecclesia by this standard; in fact, this is the type of religious organization that many of the first colonists came to America to escape.

One way to remember these religious organizational terms is to think of cults, sects, denominations, and ecclesia representing a continuum, with increasing influence on society, where cults are least influential, and ecclesia are most influential.

Scholars from a variety of disciplines have strived to classify religions. One widely accepted categorization that helps people understand different belief systems considers what or whom people worship (if anything). Using this method of classification, religions might fall into one of these basic categories.

Note that some religions may be practiced – or understood – in various categories. For instance, the Christian notion of the Holy Trinity (God, Jesus, Holy Spirit) defies the definition of monotheism, which is a religion based on a belief in a single deity, to some scholars. Similarly, many Westerners view the multiple manifestations of Hinduism’s godhead as polytheistic, which is a religion based on a belief in multiple deities,, while Hindus might describe those manifestations are a monotheistic parallel to the Christian Trinity. Some Japanese practice Shinto, which follows animism, which is a religion that believes in the divinity of nonhuman beings, like animals, plants, and objects of the natural world, while people who practice totemism believe in a divine connection between humans and other natural beings.

It is also important to note that every society also has nonbelievers, such as atheists, who do not believe in a divine being or entity, and agnostics, who hold that ultimate reality (such as God) is unknowable. While typically not an organized group, atheists and agnostics represent a significant portion of the population. It is essential to recognize that being a nonbeliever in a divine entity does not mean the individual subscribes to no morality. Indeed, many Nobel Peace Prize winners and other great humanitarians over the centuries would have classified themselves as atheists or agnostics.

Religions have emerged and developed across the world. Some have been short-lived, while others have persisted and grown. In this section, we will explore seven of the world’s major religions.

The oldest religion in the world, Hinduism originated in the Indus River Valley about 4,500 years ago in what is now modern-day northwest India and Pakistan. It arose contemporaneously with ancient Egyptian and Mesopotamian cultures. With roughly one billion followers, Hinduism is the third-largest of the world’s religions. Hindus believe in a divine power that can manifest as different entities. Three main incarnations—Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva—are sometimes compared to the manifestations of the divine in the Christian Trinity.

Multiple sacred texts, collectively called the Vedas, contain hymns and rituals from ancient India and are mostly written in Sanskrit. Hindus generally believe in a set of principles called dharma, which refers to one’s duty in the world that corresponds with “right” actions. Hindus also believe in karma, or the notion that spiritual ramifications of one’s actions are balanced cyclically in this life or a future life (reincarnation).

Buddhism was founded by Siddhartha Gautama around 500 B.C.E. Siddhartha was said to have given up a comfortable, upper-class life to follow one of poverty and spiritual devotion. At the age of thirty-five, he famously meditated under a sacred fig tree and vowed not to rise before he achieved enlightenment (bodhi). After this experience, he became known as Buddha, or “enlightened one.” Followers were drawn to Buddha’s teachings and the practice of meditation, and he later established a monastic order.

Buddha’s teachings encourage Buddhists to lead a moral life by accepting the four Noble Truths: 1) life is suffering, 2) suffering arises from attachment to desires, 3) suffering ceases when attachment to desires ceases, and 4) freedom from suffering is possible by following the “middle way.” The concept of the “middle way” is central to Buddhist thinking, which encourages people to live in the present and to practice acceptance of others (Smith 1991). Buddhism also tends to deemphasize the role of a godhead, instead of stressing the importance of personal responsibility (Craig 2002).

Confucianism

Confucianism was the official religion of China from 200 B.C.E. until it was officially abolished when communist leadership discouraged the religious practice in 1949. The religion was developed by Kung Fu-Tzu (Confucius), who lived in the sixth and fifth centuries B.C.E. An extraordinary teacher, his lessons—which were about self-discipline, respect for authority and tradition, and jen (the kind treatment of every person)—were collected in a book called the Analects.

Some religious scholars consider Confucianism more of a social system than a religion because it focuses on sharing wisdom about moral practices but does not involve any specific worship; nor does it have formal objects. Its teachings were developed in the context of problems of social anarchy and a near-complete deterioration of social cohesion. Dissatisfied with the social solutions put forth, Kung Fu-Tzu developed his model of religious morality to help guide society (Smith 1991).

In Taoism , the purpose of life is inner peace and harmony. Tao is usually translated as “way” or “path.” The founder of the religion is generally recognized to be a man named Laozi, who lived sometime in the sixth century B.C.E. in China. Taoist beliefs emphasize the virtues of compassion and moderation.

The central concept of tao can be understood to describe a spiritual reality, the order of the universe, or the way of modern life in harmony with the former two. The ying-yang symbol and the concept of polar forces are central Taoist ideas (Smith 1991). Some scholars have compared this Chinese tradition to its Confucian counterpart by saying that “whereas Confucianism is concerned with day-to-day rules of conduct, Taoism is concerned with a more spiritual level of being” (Feng and English 1972).

After their Exodus from Egypt in the thirteenth century B.C.E., Jews, a nomadic society, became monotheistic, worshipping only one God. The Jews’ covenant, or promise of a special relationship with Yahweh (God), is an essential element of Judaism, and their sacred text is the Torah, which Christians also follow as the first five books of the Bible. Talmud refers to a collection of sacred Jewish oral interpretation of the Torah. Jews emphasize moral behavior and action in this world as opposed to beliefs or personal salvation in the next world.

Probably one of the most misunderstood religions in the world is Islam. Though predominantly centered in the Middle East and Northern Africa, Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world with 1.3 billion and is only second to Christianity is members. Islam is also divided into two major branches: Sunni and Shiite. The Sunni branch is the largest, composed of 83 percent of all Muslims. The Shiite branch is more concentrated in clusters such as Iran, Iraq, and Pakistan.

Islam is monotheistic religion and it follows the teaching of the prophet Muhammad, born in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, in 570 C.E. Muhammad is seen only as a prophet, not as a divine being, and he is believed to be the messenger of Allah (God), who is divine. The followers of Islam, whose U.S. population is projected to double in the next twenty years (Pew Research Forum 2011), are called Muslims.

Islam means “peace” and “submission.” The sacred text for Muslims is the Qur’an (or Koran). As with Christianity’s Old Testament, many of the Qur’an stories are shared with the Jewish faith. Divisions exist within Islam, but all Muslims are guided by five beliefs or practices, often called “pillars”: 1) Allah is the only god, and Muhammad is his prophet, 2) daily prayer, 3) helping those in poverty, 4) fasting as a spiritual practice, and 5) pilgrimage to the holy center of Mecca.

In Western nations, the primary loyalty of the population is to the state. In the Islamic world, however, loyalty to a nation-state is trumped by dedication to religion and loyalty to one’s family, extended family, tribal group, and culture. In regions dominated by Islam, tribalism and religion play determining roles in the operation of social, economic, cultural, and political systems. As a result, the nation states within the Islamic civilization are weak and generally ineffectual. Instead of nationalism, Muslims are far more interested in identifying with “ummah,” (Islamic civilization).

Furthermore, despite the lack of a core Islamic state, the leaders of the many Muslim nations created (1969) the Organization of the Islamic Conference in order to foster a sense of solidarity between Muslim states. Almost all nations with large Muslim populations are now members of the organization. Additionally, some of the more powerful Muslim states have sponsored the World Muslim Conference and the Muslim League to bring Muslims together in a unified block.

It is instructive to notice that the concept of ummah rests on the notion that nation-states are the illegitimate children of Western Civilization, designed to further Western interests at the expense of others. Currently, Islamic Civilization has no identifiable core state, but nations such as Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia could assume that role in the future.

It is common for Americans to suggest that they do not have a problem with Islam; only Islamic extremists. Huntington, however, argues that the lessons of history demonstrate the opposite. In fact, over the last fourteen hundred years, Christians and Muslims have almost always had stormy relations. After Muslims were able to take control of North Africa, Iberia, the Middle East, Persia, and Northern India in the seventh and eighth centuries, relatively peaceful boundaries between Islam and Christendom existed for about two hundred years. In 1095, however, Christian rulers launched the Crusades to regain control of the “Holy Land.” Despite some successes, they were eventually defeated in 1291. Not long after this, the Ottoman Empire spread Islam into Byzantium, North Africa, the Balkans, and other parts of Europe. They eventually sacked Vienna, and for many years, Europe was under constant threat from Islamic forces. In the fifteenth century, Christians were able to regain control of Iberia, and the Russians were able to bring an end to Tatar rule. In 1683, the Ottomans again attacked Vienna but were defeated, and from that time on, the people of the Balkans sought to rid themselves of Ottoman rule. By the beginning of World War I, the Ottoman Empire was referred to as the “sick man of Europe.” By 1920, only four Islamic countries (Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Afghanistan) were free of non-Muslim rule.

As Western colonialism began to wane in the twentieth century, the populations of about forty-five independent states were solidly Muslim. The independence of these Muslim nations was accompanied by a great deal of violence. 50% of the wars that occurred between 1820 and 1929 involved battles between Muslims and Christians. The conflicts were primarily products of two very different points of view. Whereas Christians believe in the separation of Church and State (God and Caesar), Muslims view religion and politics as the same. Additionally, both Christians and Muslims hold a universalistic view. Each believes that it is the one “true faith,” and both (to one extent or another) believe that they should convert others to their faith.

In addition to the importance of the religious foundations of the Western and Islamic Civilizations, practical, real-world factors also play important roles. For example, Muslim population growth has created large numbers of unemployed, angry youth who have been regularly recruited to Islamic causes. Furthermore, the resurgence of Islam has provided Muslims with confidence in the worth of their civilization relative to the West. Western policies and actions over the last century have also played a significant role in cracking the fault line between Islam and Christendom. From the Islamic point of view, the West (particularly the United States) has meddled in the internal affairs of the Islamic world far too often, and for far too long.

Huntington is convinced the Western and Islamic Civilizations are in for many years, perhaps more than a century, of conflict and tension. He points out that Muslims are growing increasingly anti-Western while at the same time, people in the Western Civilization are increasingly concerned about the intentions (and excesses) of modern Islamic states such as Iran. Europeans express a growing fear of (and impatience with) fundamentalist Muslims who threaten them with terrorist attacks. They are also growing weary of Islamic immigrants who refuse to adhere to European traditions, and in some cases, laws.

Huntington does not mince words. He boldly states,”…the underlying problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam; a different civilization whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture, and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power.” He goes on to add, “…the problem for Islam is not the CIA or the U.S. Department of Defense. It is the West; a different civilization whose people are convinced of the universality of their culture, and believe that they are superior, if declining, power imposes on them an obligation to extend that culture throughout the world.” From Huntington’s perspective, these differences will fuel conflict between Western and Islamic cultures for many years to come.

Many Western leaders do not agree with Huntington’s view. Instead, they argue that Americans need not to fear Islam; only radical Islam. They point to the millions of Muslims living throughout the world in peace with their non-Muslim neighbors. If, they reason, Islam were indeed a religion of war and conquest, why is it that millions of Muslims lead peaceful lives? Instead of applying a negative stereotype to all Muslims, they believe our national security would be better served by making more considerable effort to understand the motivations and goals of radical fundamentalists. In a sense, they are calling for in-depth cultural studies that will lead to accurate cultural intelligence about the nature of Islamic terrorists — simply branding all Muslims as potential terrorists are, from those who do not agree with Huntington, simplistic and dangerous.

Christianity

Today the largest religion in the world, Christianity began 2,000 years ago in Palestine, with Jesus of Nazareth, a charismatic leader who taught his followers about caritas (charity) or treating others as you would like to be treated yourself.

The sacred text for Christians is the Bible. While Jews, Christians, and Muslims share many of same historical religious stories, their beliefs verge. In their shared sacred stories, it is suggested that the son of God—a messiah—will return to save God’s followers. While Christians believe that he already appeared in the person of Jesus Christ, Jews and Muslims disagree. While they recognize Christ as a prominent historical figure, their traditions do not believe he is the son of God, and their faiths see the prophecy of the Messiah’s arrival as not yet fulfilled.

Different Christian groups have variations among their sacred texts. For instance, Mormons, an established Christian sect, also use the Book of Mormon, which they believe details other parts of Christian doctrine and Jesus’ life that is not included in the Bible. Similarly, the Catholic Bible includes the Apocrypha, a collection that, while part of the 1611 King James translation, is no longer included in Protestant versions of the Bible. Although monotheistic, Christians often describe their god through three manifestations that they call the Holy Trinity: the father (God), the son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is a term Christians often use to describe the religious experience, or how they feel the presence of the sacred in their lives. One foundation of Christian doctrine is the Ten Commandments, which decry acts considered sinful, including theft, murder, and adultery.

HOLY RELIGIOUS PLACES

Some of the places that in some ways contributed to the foundation and development of a faith frequently gain sacred status, either by the presence of a natural site ascribed as holy, or as the stage for miraculous events, or by some historical event such as the erection of a temple. When a place gains that “sacred” reputation, it is not unusual to see peoples from different parts of the world traveling or making a pilgrimage to this site with the hope of experiencing spiritual and physical renewal.

Buddhists have eight holy sites because they have special meaning or essential events during the Buddha’s life. The first one is in Lumbini, Nepal where the Buddha was born around 563 B.C. The second holy site is in Bodh Gaya, Nepal, where it is believed Siddhartha reached enlightenment to become the Buddha. The third most important site is in Sarnath, India where he gave his first sermon. The fourth holiest site is Kusinagara, India where the Buddha died at the age of 80 and became enlightened. The other four holy sites are where Buddha performed/experienced specific miracles. People who practice Buddhism or Shintoism erect and use pagodas to house relics and sacred texts. Pagodas are also used for individual prayer and meditation.

Islam’s holiest sites are located in Saudi Arabia. The holiest city is Mecca, Saudi Arabia where the Prophet Muhammad was born. It is also the location of the religion’s holiest objects called the Ka’ba, a cube-like structure believed to have been built by Abraham and Ishmael. The second holiest site to Muslims in Medina, Saudi Arabia where Muhammad began his leadership and gained initial support from the people. Every healthy and financially able Muslim is supposed to make at least one pilgrimage to Mecca in their lifetime. For Muslims, a mosque is considered a holy site of worship, but also a place for community assembly. Usually assembled around a courtyard, the pulpit faces Mecca so that all Muslims pray toward their holiest site. Mosques will have a tower called a minaret where someone summons people to worship.

Meaning lord, master, or power, a Christian church is a place of gathering and worship. Compared to other religions, churches play a more important role because they are created to express values and principles. Churches also play a vital role in the landscape. In earlier days and smaller towns, churches tend to be the most significant buildings. Also because of their importance, Christian religions spend lots of money and commitment to the building and maintenance of their churches.

Share This Book

From the Finnish press
News in brief
Eat and Drink
Country Promotion
Science and technology
Health & wellbeing
Beijing 2022
International news
Finland in the world press

HELSINKI FINLAND

Social change in modern times: how an interconnected world is affecting our unique cultures

essay about interconnectedness of religion culture and geography brainly

Previous Article Nightwish’s virtual concert broke records
Next Article Clean Games will contribute to the Tampere European Capital of Culture programme
Reading Mode

Although humanity has in one sense always lived in an interconnected way since the first humans stepped forth into the wider world, it goes without saying that the extent of our interconnectedness has never been higher than it is today. Modern human society is inescapably interconnected, and this occurs at all levels of human activity.

The economy, for example, is so interconnected that we tend to talk of the ‘world economy’ rather than just the ‘economy’ in a domestic sense, which reflects the fact that all economies across the world are interlinked. As evidence of this economic interrelationship, minor contractions in the domestic economy of, for example, the United States will send create shockwaves and ripples that will be felt across the world. Similarly, a slowdown in the economic output could have repercussions for consumer trends in countries on the opposite side of the globe. But the economy is not the only area of human activity that is being affected by our increasing interconnectedness as humans belonging to and coming from our own unique cultures. With instantaneous forms of global communication facilitated by technology, the reality of being interconnected is also having an impact on humans at a cultural and social level. This social and cultural phenomenon, which is a natural consequence of globalisation, was the subject of a recent article by The Economist , which sought to investigate the ''flat white world'' we now find ourselves living in. Here, the term ''flat white world'' is used to capture the fact that a local coffee trend that started in Australia – which itself is built on a coffee tradition inherited from Italian migrants – quickly spread across the globe. In this sense, the flat white provides a good example of how the wheels of globalisation turn in an interconnected world. By looking at how coffee trends spread, particularly through the influence of multinational corporations such as Starbucks, we begin to get a sense of how globalised trends like the flat white can shape or dislodge local cultures. In their article, The Economist highlights how this new type of globalisation signals the emergence of a new form of interconnectedness, which is different to older types of globalisation, which primarily involved direct foreign investment by multinational companies. In the modern age, globalisation takes the form of a kind of cultural globalisation, where social trends spread quickly across the world. This form of interconnectedness is hastened by social media platforms, which accelerate the homogenisation of culture in the global age. And it is for this reason, The Economist notes, that even in countries such as Kabul, that were relatively closed off from the wider world until recently, we can find bearded hipsters sipping flat whites in their local co-working space. This new form of globalised interconnectedness is clearly having a profound impact on shaping local tastes, preferences and trends. Beyond beards, anchor tattoos and flat whites, another good example of this trend is the rise of online iGaming. Up until a few years ago, the Finns, much like citizens of other Nordic countries, viewed iGaming as a social taboo. In recent years, however, iGaming has also exploded in popularity in the Nordic countries, with hundreds of new gaming sites popping up in a short period. Finland and other Nordic countries are now an epicentre of online games development, with new platforms such as Thrills setting up shop recently. But what are the consequences of living in an interconnected world like this? Is cultural and social homogenisation all negative, or are there some benefits to be had? The honest answer is that there are both positive and negative aspects to cultural globalisation. On the negative end of the spectrum, we can see how the importation of foreign coffee cultures through corporations like Starbucks could dislodge local coffee cultures that are steeped in hundreds of years of history. This might involve, for example, rich, complex, Turkish coffee being ditched for a comparatively flavourless latte. But on the other hand, there are also potential benefits that this kind of interconnectedness can bring. In the Finnish example , we can see how rising global trends can help to dislodge or combat social taboos to open up society. We begin to get a sense, then, that modern humans find themselves faced with tension in their daily lives between the demands of local and global society. How a balance between these two poles of existence can be struck, however, remains to be seen.

Get our latest free newsletter

Week's Most Popular Articles

Earnings-based unemployment allowance to drop noticeably in September
Finnish Olympic athletes deliver scathing reproach of Olympic Committee
Student residence permit processing speeds up despite growing application numbers
YLE: Finnish alcohol industry displeased with change that brought stronger drinks to grocery shops
Finnish shipyard bags €1.5bn order for fourth Icon Class cruise ship
Long unemployment periods among work-based residence permit holders in Finland, including specialists
Stora Enso must cover cost of river clean-up, states Mykkänen
Influencers continue aggressive tax planning through holding company arrangements
Finnish government launches anti-racism campaign, drawing criticism and exposing old divisions
New rules increase buyer liability for excise duties on online alcohol purchases starting in September

Last Month's Most Read Articles

Finland extends work requirement for unemployment benefits: New changes to take effect in September
Finland’s declining expat ranking, budget deficit and flexible parental leaves: Finland in the world press
Finland appears unwelcoming to international talent, shows survey
Why Finland's debt is rising faster than the Euro area's: An analysis
Kela: Stopping national pension payments abroad could create more work, prompt lawsuits
Finland's rising unemployment bucks EU trend
Finnish labor market faces dual challenges: Employment levels steady, but long-term unemployment rises
Mooted re-employment rule for foreign workers widely rejected in comments
Russian espionage in Åland, Simon Ekpa controversy and gloomy economic outlook: Finland in the world press

Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.

Sacred Worlds

DOI link for Sacred Worlds

Get Citation

This book, the first in the field for two decades, looks at the relationships between geography and religion. It represents a synthesis of research by geographers of many countries, mainly since the 1960s. No previous book has tackled this emerging field from such a broad, interdisciplinary perspective, and never before have such a variety of detailed case studies been pulled together in so comparative or illuminating a way. Examples and case studies have been drawn from all the major world religions and from all continents from both a historical and contemporary perspective. Major themes covered in the book include the distribution of religion and the processes by which religion and religious ideas spread through space and time. Some of the important links between religion and population are also explored. A great deal of attention is focused on the visible manifestations of religion on the cultural landscape, including landscapes of worship and of death, and the whole field of sacred space and religious pilgrimage.

Privacy Policy
Terms & Conditions
Cookie Policy
Taylor & Francis Online
Taylor & Francis Group
Students/Researchers
Librarians/Institutions

Connect with us

Experiential Learning
Human Subject Pool
Student Associations
Student Research
PhD Program
Behavioural Neuroscience
Cognitive Science
Developmental
Quantitative Methods
Social & Personality
Opportunities
Research Streams
Participate
Postdoctoral Research
PSYC240: Research Experience
Newsletters
Pets of UBC Psych
EDI Committee
EDI Strategy, Goals & Initiatives
EDI Involvement
EDI Resources & Support
EDI Funding
EDI Research
Diversity Mentorship Program
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
Psychology Clinic
Community Pantry
Job Opportunities
Sustainability

Q&A: The relationship between religion and culture

October 28, 2021

Image by truthseeker08 from Pixabay

Do people who affiliate with the same religious traditions share cultural traits—even across geographic distances and political boundaries?

To answer this question, a team of researchers explored different cultures around the globe for evidence of common cultural traits across religious groups. They found that people who share religious traditions were more culturally similar than those who do not.

The research, Cultural similarity among coreligionists within and between countries , published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , informs cultural evolutionary theories about the place of religion and secularity in the world’s cultural diversity.

The co-authors are former UBC Psychology PhD students Dr. Cindel White and Dr. Michael Muthukrishna, and UBC Psychology Professor Dr. Ara Norenzayan.

Dr. Cindel White , now an assistant professor in the department of psychology at York University, and Dr. Ara Norenzayan discuss the findings and share some surprising results.

What was the impetus behind this research?

Cindel White

White: The world we live in is teeming with cultural diversity. What are the origins of this diversity? While we know that geography, social class, ethnicity and national culture are well-known sources of the world’s cultural diversity, less is known about religion’s role. For many people, religion is an important part of their identity and guides beliefs about what is true and right, and how to live one’s best life. Also, many established religions have been around for a long time. Therefore, religious traditions could be a potentially important source of variation in cultural traits around the world. We wanted to look broadly across a range of many different cultural traits, to see whether there was evidence of distinct patterns of cultural traits across members of different religious groups around the globe. We also compared the relative importance of religion and country in the way people come to share cultural traits.

How did the study work?

Ara Norenzayan

Norenzayan: We analyzed patterns in how groups of people responded to the World Values Survey: a large dataset with over two hundred thousand individuals from 88 countries, who reported their attitudes, beliefs, and preferences across many different domains in life. This included reports of religious and moral values, but also topics that were not obviously relevant to religion, such as attitudes towards finance, politics, child-rearing, social relationships, and law. Collectively we can treat these as shared cultural traits that characterize groups. We borrowed a technique from population biology to measure cultural distances between groups. The most interesting question to us was whether religious traditions spill over into aspects of cultures that do not have religious content at all. All of these were traits that could be potentially culturally transmitted, within religious or national groups. We wanted to know: how much of the global variability in these cultural traits can be traced to religious denominations, strength of religious commitment, and the country in which people lived?

What type of cultural similarities would we see in world religions, despite the geographic and political boundaries?

White: We found that affiliation with a particular religious tradition predicted a unique pattern of cultural traits. Furthermore, people who share a religious affiliation but live in different countries tended to be more similar to one another than they were to people with different religious affiliations. For example, all else being equal, Buddhist practitioners in Thailand to some degree shared cultural traits with Buddhist practitioners in China. What’s interesting about this is that co-religionists were culturally similar despite the geographic, ethnic, and linguistic divisions separating them. These patterns were present across many different domains of culture, showing a pervasive signature of religion in the way that cultural traits are distributed around the world. This implies that global religions foster super-ethnic cultural identities that reverberate in global events today.

What does this research tell us about the place of religion and secularity in the world’s cultural diversity?

Norenzayan: Although living in different countries was associated with much larger cultural differences than having different religious affiliations, one’s religious denomination and strength of religious commitment consistently explained unique variation in cultural traits: Those who shared a religion (or conversely, shared a secular, non-religious orientation) also shared cultural traits that distinguished them from other religious groups within the same countries. This means that we can look to variation in religious traditions – how religions are distributed through the world and how they are changing – to help us understand a variety of other cultural traits that vary across human populations. This cultural variation is not explained by other better-studied group markers, such as ethnicity, language, and nationality. Therefore, unpacking the relationships between religion and culture will be a necessary part of understanding the diverse array of attitudes, beliefs, and preferences around the world.

Did anything surprise you about the results?

White: One of the more surprising findings was the cultural similarities among co-religionists weren’t only present among those who were highly religious and committed to the same tradition. People low in religious commitment – those who don’t identify themselves as religious and don’t attend religious services very often – were also similar to one another, and culturally different from highly-religious individuals. It isn’t merely the type of religious affiliation, or strength of religious commitment that matter; these factors jointly predicted cultural similarity. This provides evidence of a unique cultural signature of secularity. There is something to the idea that a global secular culture is emerging around the world.

Another surprising finding was that followers of the “Big Five” religions with a worldwide presence – Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Judaism, and Hinduism – tended to cluster together, and collectively they were more distinct from smaller, local folk religious traditions (such as ancestral worshipping or spiritualist and pagan groups). On the whole, followers of these five world religions endorsed quite similar patterns of cultural values. There is a lot that adherents of these religious traditions share, despite contemporary anxieties about religious divides on the global stage.

Recent News

Welcome to the start of the 2024/2025 term.

Psychology students receive 2024 CPA Certificate of Academic Excellence

Four new faculty members join UBC Psychology

Tools and Resources
Customer Services
Communication and Culture
Communication and Social Change
Communication and Technology
Communication Theory
Critical/Cultural Studies
Gender (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Studies)
Health and Risk Communication
Intergroup Communication
International/Global Communication
Interpersonal Communication
Journalism Studies
Language and Social Interaction
Mass Communication
Media and Communication Policy
Organizational Communication
Political Communication
Rhetorical Theory
Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Article contents

Religion, culture, and communication.

Stephen M. Croucher , Stephen M. Croucher School of Communication, Journalism, and Marketing, Massey Business School, Massey University
Cheng Zeng , Cheng Zeng Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä
Diyako Rahmani Diyako Rahmani Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä
and Mélodine Sommier Mélodine Sommier School of History, Culture, and Communication, Eramus University
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.166
Published online: 25 January 2017

Religion is an essential element of the human condition. Hundreds of studies have examined how religious beliefs mold an individual’s sociology and psychology. In particular, research has explored how an individual’s religion (religious beliefs, religious denomination, strength of religious devotion, etc.) is linked to their cultural beliefs and background. While some researchers have asserted that religion is an essential part of an individual’s culture, other researchers have focused more on how religion is a culture in itself. The key difference is how researchers conceptualize and operationalize both of these terms. Moreover, the influence of communication in how individuals and communities understand, conceptualize, and pass on religious and cultural beliefs and practices is integral to understanding exactly what religion and culture are.

It is through exploring the relationships among religion, culture, and communication that we can best understand how they shape the world in which we live and have shaped the communication discipline itself. Furthermore, as we grapple with these relationships and terms, we can look to the future and realize that the study of religion, culture, and communication is vast and open to expansion. Researchers are beginning to explore the influence of mediation on religion and culture, how our globalized world affects the communication of religions and cultures, and how interreligious communication is misunderstood; and researchers are recognizing the need to extend studies into non-Christian religious cultures.

communication
intercultural communication

Intricate Relationships among Religion, Communication, and Culture

Compiling an entry on the relationships among religion, culture, and communication is not an easy task. There is not one accepted definition for any of these three terms, and research suggests that the connections among these concepts are complex, to say the least. Thus, this article attempts to synthesize the various approaches to these three terms and integrate them. In such an endeavor, it is impossible to discuss all philosophical and paradigmatic debates or include all disciplines.

It is difficult to define religion from one perspective and with one encompassing definition. “Religion” is often defined as the belief in or the worship of a god or gods. Geertz ( 1973 ) defined a religion as

(1) a system which acts to (2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by (3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and (4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that (5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic. (p. 90)

It is essential to recognize that religion cannot be understood apart from the world in which it takes place (Marx & Engels, 1975 ). To better understand how religion relates to and affects culture and communication, we should first explore key definitions, philosophies, and perspectives that have informed how we currently look at religion. In particular, the influences of Karl Marx, Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, and Georg Simmel are discussed to further understand the complexity of religion.

Karl Marx ( 1818–1883 ) saw religion as descriptive and evaluative. First, from a descriptive point of view, Marx believed that social and economic situations shape how we form and regard religions and what is religious. For Marx, the fact that people tend to turn to religion more when they are facing economic hardships or that the same religious denomination is practiced differently in different communities would seem perfectly logical. Second, Marx saw religion as a form of alienation (Marx & Engels, 1975 ). For Marx, the notion that the Catholic Church, for example, had the ability or right to excommunicate an individual, and thus essentially exclude them from the spiritual community, was a classic example of exploitation and domination. Such alienation and exploitation was later echoed in the works of Friedrich Nietzsche ( 1844–1900 ), who viewed organized religion as society and culture controlling man (Nietzsche, 1996 ).

Building on Marxist thinking, Weber ( 1864–1920 ) stressed the multicausality of religion. Weber ( 1963 ) emphasized three arguments regarding religion and society: (1) how a religion relates to a society is contingent (it varies); (2) the relationship between religion and society can only be examined in its cultural and historical context; and (3) the relationship between society and religion is slowly eroding. Weber’s arguments can be applied to Catholicism in Europe. Until the Protestant Reformation of the 15th and 16th centuries, Catholicism was the dominant religious ideology on the European continent. However, since the Reformation, Europe has increasingly become more Protestant and less Catholic. To fully grasp why many Europeans gravitate toward Protestantism and not Catholicism, we must consider the historical and cultural reasons: the Reformation, economics, immigration, politics, etc., that have all led to the majority of Europeans identifying as Protestant (Davie, 2008 ). Finally, even though the majority of Europeans identify as Protestant, secularism (separation of church and state) is becoming more prominent in Europe. In nations like France, laws are in place that officially separate the church and state, while in Northern Europe, church attendance is low, and many Europeans who identify as Protestant have very low religiosity (strength of religious devotion), focusing instead on being secularly religious individuals. From a Weberian point of view, the links among religion, history, and culture in Europe explain the decline of Catholicism, the rise of Protestantism, and now the rise of secularism.

Emile Durkheim ( 1858–1917 ) focused more on how religion performs a necessary function; it brings people and society together. Durkheim ( 1976 ) thus defined a religion as

a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say, things which are set apart and forbidden—beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them. (p. 47)

From this perspective, religion and culture are inseparable, as beliefs and practices are uniquely cultural. For example, religious rituals (one type of practice) unite believers in a religion and separate nonbelievers. The act of communion, or the sharing of the Eucharist by partaking in consecrated bread and wine, is practiced by most Christian denominations. However, the frequency of communion differs extensively, and the ritual is practiced differently based on historical and theological differences among denominations.

Georg Simmel ( 1858–1918 ) focused more on the fluidity and permanence of religion and religious life. Simmel ( 1950 ) believed that religious and cultural beliefs develop from one another. Moreover, he asserted that religiosity is an essential element to understand when examining religious institutions and religion. While individuals may claim to be part of a religious group, Simmel asserted that it was important to consider just how religious the individuals were. In much of Europe, religiosity is low: Germany 34%, Sweden 19%, Denmark 42%, the United Kingdom 30%, the Czech Republic 23%, and The Netherlands 26%, while religiosity is relatively higher in the United States (56%), which is now considered the most religious industrialized nation in the world ( Telegraph Online , 2015 ). The decline of religiosity in parts of Europe and its rise in the U.S. is linked to various cultural, historical, and communicative developments that will be further discussed.

Combining Simmel’s ( 1950 ) notion of religion with Geertz’s ( 1973 ) concept of religion and a more basic definition (belief in or the worship of a god or gods through rituals), it is clear that the relationship between religion and culture is integral and symbiotic. As Clark and Hoover ( 1997 ) noted, “culture and religion are inseparable” and “religion is an important consideration in theories of culture and society” (p. 17).

Outside of the Western/Christian perception of religion, Buddhist scholars such as Nagarajuna present a relativist framework to understand concepts like time and causality. This framework is distinct from the more Western way of thinking, in that notions of present, past, and future are perceived to be chronologically distorted, and the relationship between cause and effect is paradoxical (Wimal, 2007 ). Nagarajuna’s philosophy provides Buddhism with a relativist, non-solid dependent, and non-static understanding of reality (Kohl, 2007 ). Mulla Sadra’s philosophy explored the metaphysical relationship between the created universe and its singular creator. In his philosophy, existence takes precedence over essence, and any existing object reflects a part of the creator. Therefore, every devoted person is obliged to know themselves as the first step to knowing the creator, which is the ultimate reason for existence. This Eastern perception of religion is similar to that of Nagarajuna and Buddhism, as they both include the paradoxical elements that are not easily explained by the rationality of Western philosophy. For example, the god, as Mulla Sadra defines it, is beyond definition, description, and delamination, yet it is absolutely simple and unique (Burrell, 2013 ).

How researchers define and study culture varies extensively. For example, Hall ( 1989 ) defined culture as “a series of situational models for behavior and thought” (p. 13). Geertz ( 1973 ), building on the work of Kluckhohn ( 1949 ), defined culture in terms of 11 different aspects:

(1) the total way of life of a people; (2) the social legacy the individual acquires from his group; (3) a way of thinking, feeling, and believing; (4) an abstraction from behavior; (5) a theory on the part of the anthropologist about the way in which a group of people in fact behave; (6) a storehouse of pooled learning; (7) a set of standardized orientations to recurrent problems; (8) learned behavior; (9) a mechanism for the normative regulation of behavior; (10) a set of techniques for adjusting both to the external environment and to other men; (11) a precipitate of history. (Geertz, 1973 , p. 5)

Research on culture is divided between an essentialist camp and a constructivist camp. The essentialist view regards culture as a concrete and fixed system of symbols and meanings (Holiday, 1999 ). An essentialist approach is most prevalent in linguistic studies, in which national culture is closely linked to national language. Regarding culture as a fluid concept, constructionist views of culture focus on how it is performed and negotiated by individuals (Piller, 2011 ). In this sense, “culture” is a verb rather than a noun. In principle, a non-essentialist approach rejects predefined national cultures and uses culture as a tool to interpret social behavior in certain contexts.

Different approaches to culture influence significantly how it is incorporated into communication studies. Cultural communication views communication as a resource for individuals to produce and regulate culture (Philipsen, 2002 ). Constructivists tend to perceive culture as a part of the communication process (Applegate & Sypher, 1988 ). Cross-cultural communication typically uses culture as a national boundary. Hofstede ( 1991 ) is probably the most popular scholar in this line of research. Culture is thus treated as a theoretical construct to explain communication variations across cultures. This is also evident in intercultural communication studies, which focus on misunderstandings between individuals from different cultures.

Religion, Community, and Culture

There is an interplay among religion, community, and culture. Community is essentially formed by a group of people who share common activities or beliefs based on their mutual affect, loyalty, and personal concerns. Participation in religious institutions is one of the most dominant community engagements worldwide. Religious institutions are widely known for creating a sense of community by offering various material and social supports for individual followers. In addition, the role that religious organizations play in communal conflicts is also crucial. As religion deals with the ultimate matters of life, the differences among different religious beliefs are virtually impossible to settle. Although a direct causal relationship between religion and violence is not well supported, religion is, nevertheless, commonly accepted as a potential escalating factor in conflicts. Currently, religious conflicts are on the rise, and they are typically more violent, long-lasting, and difficult to resolve. In such cases, local religious organizations, places facilitating collective actions in the community, are extremely vital, as they can either preach peace or stir up hatred and violence. The peace impact of local religious institutions has been largely witnessed in India and Indonesia where conflicts are solved at the local level before developing into communal violence (De Juan, Pierskalla, & Vüllers, 2015 ).

While religion affects cultures (Beckford & Demerath, 2007 ), it itself is also affected by culture, as religion is an essential layer of culture. For example, the growth of individualism in the latter half of the 20th century has been coincident with the decline in the authority of Judeo-Christian institutions and the emergence of “parachurches” and more personal forms of prayer (Hoover & Lundby, 1997 ). However, this decline in the authority of the religious institutions in modernized society has not reduced the important role of religion and spirituality as one of the main sources of calm when facing painful experiences such as death, suffering, and loss.

When cultural specifications, such as individualism and collectivism, have been attributed to religion, the proposed definitions and functions of religion overlap with definitions of culture. For example, researchers often combine religious identification (Jewish, Christian, Muslim, etc.) with cultural dimensions (Hofstede, 1991 ) like individualism/collectivism to understand and compare cultural differences. Such combinations for comparison and analytical purposes demonstrate how religion and religious identification in particular are often relegated to a micro-level variable, when in fact the true relationship between an individual’s religion and culture is inseparable.

Religion as Part of Culture in Communication Studies

Religion as a part of culture has been linked to numerous communication traits and behaviors. Specifically, religion has been linked with media use and preferences (e.g., Stout & Buddenbaum, 1996 ), health/medical decisions and communication about health-related issues (Croucher & Harris, 2012 ), interpersonal communication (e.g., Croucher, Faulkner, Oommen, & Long, 2012b ), organizational behaviors (e.g., Garner & Wargo, 2009 ), and intercultural communication traits and behaviors (e.g., Croucher, Braziunaite, & Oommen, 2012a ). In media and religion scholarship, researchers have shown how religion as a cultural variable has powerful effects on media use, preferences, and gratifications. The research linking media and religion is vast (Stout & Buddenbaum, 1996 ). This body of research has shown how “religious worldviews are created and sustained in ongoing social processes in which information is shared” (Stout & Buddenbaum, 1996 , pp. 7–8). For example, religious Christians are more likely to read newspapers, while religious individuals are less likely to have a favorable opinion of the internet (Croucher & Harris, 2012 ), and religious individuals (who typically attend religious services and are thus integrated into a religious community) are more likely to read media produced by the religious community (Davie, 2008 ).

Research into health/medical decisions and communication about health-related issues is also robust. Research shows how religion, specifically religiosity, promotes healthier living and better decision-making regarding health and wellbeing (Harris & Worley, 2012 ). For example, a religious (or spiritual) approach to cancer treatment can be more effective than a secular approach (Croucher & Harris, 2012 ), religious attendance promotes healthier living, and people with HIV/AIDS often turn to religion for comfort as well. These studies suggest the significance of religion in health communication and in our health.

Research specifically examining the links between religion and interpersonal communication is not as vast as the research into media, health, and religion. However, this slowly growing body of research has explored areas such as rituals, self-disclosure (Croucher et al., 2012b ), and family dynamics (Davie, 2008 ), to name a few.

The role of religion in organizations is well studied. Overall, researchers have shown how religious identification and religiosity influence an individual’s organizational behavior. For example, research has shown that an individual’s religious identification affects levels of organizational dissent (Croucher et al., 2012a ). Garner and Wargo ( 2009 ) further showed that organizational dissent functions differently in churches than in nonreligious organizations. Kennedy and Lawton ( 1998 ) explored the relationships between religious beliefs and perceptions about business/corporate ethics and found that individuals with stronger religious beliefs have stricter ethical beliefs.

Researchers are increasingly looking at the relationships between religion and intercultural communication. Researchers have explored how religion affects numerous communication traits and behaviors and have shown how religious communities perceive and enact religious beliefs. Antony ( 2010 ), for example, analyzed the bindi in India and how the interplay between religion and culture affects people’s acceptance of it. Karniel and Lavie-Dinur ( 2011 ) showed how religion and culture influence how Palestinian Arabs are represented on Israeli television. Collectively, the intercultural work examining religion demonstrates the increasing importance of the intersection between religion and culture in communication studies.

Collectively, communication studies discourse about religion has focused on how religion is an integral part of an individual’s culture. Croucher et al. ( 2016 ), in a content analysis of communication journal coverage of religion and spirituality from 2002 to 2012 , argued that the discourse largely focuses on religion as a cultural variable by identifying religious groups as variables for comparative analysis, exploring “religious” or “spiritual” as adjectives to describe entities (religious organizations), and analyzing the relationships between religious groups in different contexts. Croucher and Harris ( 2012 ) asserted that the discourse about religion, culture, and communication is still in its infancy, though it continues to grow at a steady pace.

Future Lines of Inquiry

Research into the links among religion, culture, and communication has shown the vast complexities of these terms. With this in mind, there are various directions for future research/exploration that researchers could take to expand and benefit our practical understanding of these concepts and how they relate to one another. Work should continue to define these terms with a particular emphasis on mediation, closely consider these terms in a global context, focus on how intergroup dynamics influence this relationship, and expand research into non-Christian religious cultures.

Additional definitional work still needs to be done to clarify exactly what is meant by “religion,” “culture,” and “communication.” Our understanding of these terms and relationships can be further enhanced by analyzing how forms of mass communication mediate each other. Martin-Barbero ( 1993 ) asserted that there should be a shift from media to mediations as multiple opposing forces meet in communication. He defined mediation as “the articulations between communication practices and social movements and the articulation of different tempos of development with the plurality of cultural matrices” (p. 187). Religions have relied on mediations through various media to communicate their messages (oral stories, print media, radio, television, internet, etc.). These media share religious messages, shape the messages and religious communities, and are constantly changing. What we find is that, as media sophistication develops, a culture’s understandings of mediated messages changes (Martin-Barbero, 1993 ). Thus, the very meanings of religion, culture, and communication are transitioning as societies morph into more digitally mediated societies. Research should continue to explore the effects of digital mediation on our conceptualizations of religion, culture, and communication.

Closely linked to mediation is the need to continue extending our focus on the influence of globalization on religion, culture, and communication. It is essential to study the relationships among culture, religion, and communication in the context of globalization. In addition to trading goods and services, people are increasingly sharing ideas, values, and beliefs in the modern world. Thus, globalization not only leads to technological and socioeconomic changes, but also shapes individuals’ ways of communicating and their perceptions and beliefs about religion and culture. While religion represents an old way of life, globalization challenges traditional meaning systems and is often perceived as a threat to religion. For instance, Marx and Weber both asserted that modernization was incompatible with tradition. But, in contrast, globalization could facilitate religious freedom by spreading the idea of freedom worldwide. Thus, future work needs to consider the influence of globalization to fully grasp the interrelationships among religion, culture, and communication in the world.

A review of the present definitions of religion in communication research reveals that communication scholars approach religion as a holistic, total, and unique institution or notion, studied from the viewpoint of different communication fields such as health, intercultural, interpersonal, organizational communication, and so on. However, this approach to communication undermines the function of a religion as a culture and also does not consider the possible differences between religious cultures. For example, religious cultures differ in their levels of individualism and collectivism. There are also differences in how religious cultures interact to compete for more followers and territory (Klock, Novoa, & Mogaddam, 2010 ). Thus, localization is one area of further research for religion communication studies. This line of study best fits in the domain of intergroup communication. Such an approach will provide researchers with the opportunity to think about the roles that interreligious communication can play in areas such as peacemaking processes (Klock et al., 2010 ).

Academic discourse about religion has focused largely on Christian denominations. In a content analysis of communication journal discourse on religion and spirituality, Croucher et al. ( 2016 ) found that the terms “Christian” or “Christianity” appeared in 9.56% of all articles, and combined with other Christian denominations (Catholicism, Evangelism, Baptist, Protestantism, and Mormonism, for example), appeared in 18.41% of all articles. Other religious cultures (denominations) made up a relatively small part of the overall academic discourse: Islam appeared in 6.8%, Judaism in 4.27%, and Hinduism in only 0.96%. Despite the presence of various faiths in the data, the dominance of Christianity and its various denominations is incontestable. Having religions unevenly represented in the academic discourse is problematic. This highly unbalanced representation presents a biased picture of religious practices. It also represents one faith as being the dominant faith and others as being minority religions in all contexts.

Ultimately, the present overview, with its focus on religion, culture, and communication points to the undeniable connections among these concepts. Religion and culture are essential elements of humanity, and it is through communication, that these elements of humanity are mediated. Whether exploring these terms in health, interpersonal, intercultural, intergroup, mass, or other communication contexts, it is evident that understanding the intersection(s) among religion, culture, and communication offers vast opportunities for researchers and practitioners.

Information

Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

Active Journals
Find a Journal
Proceedings Series
For Authors
For Reviewers
For Editors
For Librarians
For Publishers
For Societies
For Conference Organizers
Open Access Policy
Institutional Open Access Program
Special Issues Guidelines
Editorial Process
Research and Publication Ethics
Article Processing Charges
Testimonials
Preprints.org
SciProfiles
Encyclopedia

Article Menu

Subscribe SciFeed
Recommended Articles
Google Scholar
on Google Scholar
Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Globalization and religion in historical perspective: a paradoxical relationship.

1. Introduction

2. defining religion, 3. defining and delineating globalization.

“the spread of transplanetary—and in recent times also more particularly supraterritorial— connections between people . From this perspective, globalisation involves reductions in barriers to transworld contacts. People become more able—physically, legally, linguistically, culturally and psychologically—to engage with each other wherever on earth they might be.” . ([ 22 ], pp. 1473, 1478; emphasis added)

4. Religious Actors: Agents of Globalization

“latched onto caravans that would take them and their ‘spiritual goods’ into new lands. As new religious traditions carried by the Silk Road disseminated eastwards and took root along the way, travelers were increasingly able to find coreligionists in even the most far-flung and out-of-the-way places who could provide them with assistance and fellowship, and to whom in return they could bring some contact (and often cash donations) from the outside world.”. ([ 23 ], p. 12)

5. Homogenization and the Globalization Backlash

6. the modern religious backlash, 7. conclusions, abbreviations.

CFR
ESCWA
IMF
ISAF
LON
NGO
NRM
UK
UN
U.S.
WTO

Acknowledgements

1. The Western and Eastern Churches had, over time, developed their own rites. Crusader conquests could only be described as religious colonies insofar as they became beachheads in the East for the Roman rite.
2. This view also may have its origin in the positivist, post-Enlightenment view of religiosity. Thomas Madden speculates that “it is too often presumed that medieval men and women could not possibly take seriously the pious words they uttered and wrote.” Religion, goes the reasoning, would have been more of a diversion or ruse for those that sought to profit in this life ([ 31 ], 11–12).
3. Gharbzadegi renders variously into English as “Occidentosis,” “Weststruckness,” “Westomania,” “Westernitis,” “Westamination,” “Euromania” and “Blighted by the West.”
4. To Āl-e Ahmad, Westoxication was not a problem exclusive to Iran. It was, in fact, “a worldwide disease” endemic to globalization. He noticed, specifically, that the world of Islam had fallen prey to gharbzadegi , but this was a disease that afflicted the “East” in its entirety ([ 44 ], p. 9).
Reza Aslan. How to Win a Cosmic War: God, Globalization, and the End of the War on Terror . New York: Random House, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
Thomas L. Friedman. The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization . New York: Anchor Books, 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
John O’Sullivan. The President, the Pope, and the Prime Minister: Three Who Changed the World . Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
Brent J. Steele. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State . London: Routledge, 2008, p. 150. [ Google Scholar ]
W. Richard Comstock. “Toward Open Definitions of Religion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 52 (1984): 499–517. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Monica Duffy Toft, Daniel Philpott, and Timothy Samuel Shah. God’s Century: Resurgent Religion and Global Politics . New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. Annual Review of Developments in Globalization and Regional Integration in the Countries of the ESCWA Region, 2002 . New York: United Nations Publications, 2003, p. 2. [ Google Scholar ]
Kevin H. O’Rourke, and Jeffrey G. Williamson. “When Did Globalization Begin? ” European Review of Economic History 6 (2002): 23–50. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
“Globalization.” Merriam-Webster . n.d.. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalization .
Susanne Hoeber Rudolph. “Introduction: Religion, States, and Transnational Civil Society.” In Transnational Religion and Fading States . Edited by Susanne Hoeber Rudolph and James Piscatori. Boulder, Colorado: Vintage, 1997, pp. 1–24. [ Google Scholar ]
David M. Smick. The World is Curved: Hidden Dangers to the Global Economy . New York: Portfolio, 2008, pp. 1–5, 15, 34–44, 214. [ Google Scholar ]
Thomas L. Friedman. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century . New York: Macmillan, 2007, pp. 8–10. [ Google Scholar ]
Thomas L. Friedman. “It’s a Flat World, After All.” New York Times Magazine . 3 April 2005. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/03/magazine/03DOMINANCE.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all&position= .
Nayan Chanda. Bound Together: How Traders, Preachers, Adventurers, and Warriors Shaped Globalization . New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 2007. [ Google Scholar ]
André Gunder Frank, and Barry K. Gills. The World System: Five Hundred Years or Five Thousand? London: Routledge, 1999, Volume xv, pp. 3–5. [ Google Scholar ]
Hugh Liebert. “Alexander the Great and the History of Globalization.” The Review of Politics 73 (2011): 533–60. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Ali Farazmand, and Jack Pinkowski. Handbook of Globalization, Governance, and Public Administration . Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2007, pp. 13–14. [ Google Scholar ]
Jack Lule. Globalization and Media: Global Village of Babel . Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2012, p. 23. [ Google Scholar ]
Karl Moore, and David Lewis. The Origins of Globalization . New York: Routledge, 2009, pp. xii–xvi. [ Google Scholar ]
Justin Jennings. Globalizations and the Ancient World . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
Jan Nederveen Pieterse. Globalization and Culture: Global Mélange . Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2009, Volume vii, pp. 16–17, emphasis removed. [ Google Scholar ]
Jan Aart Scholte. “Defining Globalisation.” The World Economy 31 (2008): 1471–1502. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Richard Foltz. Religions of the Silk Road: Premodern Patterns of Globalization , 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
Luke M. Herrington. “Review – Religions of the Silk Road .” E-International Relations . 18 April 2012. http://www.e-ir.info/2012/04/18/review-religions-of-the-silk-road/ .
Richard Foltz. “Judaism and the Silk Route.” The History Teacher 32 (1998): 9–16. [ Google Scholar ]
Subhakanta Behera. “India’s Encounter with the Silk Road.” Economic and Political Weekly 37 (2002): 5077–80. [ Google Scholar ]
Stephen F. Dale. “Silk Road, Cotton Road, or… Indo-Chinese Trade in Pre-European Times.” Modern Asian Studies 43 (2009): 79–88. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Kevin A. Griffin. “The Globalization of Pilgrimage Tourism? Some Thoughts From Ireland.” In Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage Management: An International Perspective . Edited by Razaq Raj and Nigel D. Morpeth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cab International, 2007, pp. 15–34. [ Google Scholar ]
John L. Esposito. Islam: The Straight Path . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 91–92. [ Google Scholar ]
Bram Roos, and Michael E. Katz. prods. Christianity: The First Two Thousand Years . New York: A&E Television Networks, 2001, DVD. [ Google Scholar ]
Thomas F. Madden. A Concise History of the Crusades . Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999. [ Google Scholar ]
Jonathan Riley-Smith. The First Crusaders, 1095-1131 . Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1997, pp. 15–17. [ Google Scholar ]
Samuel P. Huntington. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order . New York: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
Jeffrey Haynes. An Introduction to International Relations and Religion . Harlow, England: Person Longman, 2007, pp. 75–76. [ Google Scholar ]
“The Battle of Seattle.” The Economist . 25 November 1999. http://www.economist.com/node/261578 .
Jim Wallis. God’s Politics: Why the Right Gets it Wrong and the Left Doesn’t Get It . San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 2005, pp. 272–78. [ Google Scholar ]
Dan G. Cox, John Falconer, and Brian Stackhouse. Terrorism, Instability, and Democracy in Asia and Africa . Boston: Northeastern University Press, 2009, p. 10. [ Google Scholar ]
Martin Austin Nesvig. “The ‘Indian Question’ and the Case of Tlatelolco.” In Local Religion in Colonial Mexico . Edited by Martin Austin Nesvig. Albuquerque, New Mexico: University of New Mexico Press, 2006, pp. 63–89. [ Google Scholar ]
Encyclopedia Britannica. “Western Colonialism.” Encyclopedia Britannica’s Guide to Black History . n.d.. http://www.britannica.com/blackhistory/article-25872 .
“Encomienda.” Encyclopedia Britannica . n.d.. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/186567/ .
Douglas Johnston, and Brian Cox. “Faith-Based Diplomacy and Preventative Engagement.” In Faith-Based Diplomacy: Trumping Realpolitik . Edited by Douglas Johnston. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 11–29. [ Google Scholar ]
James A. Bill. The Eagle and the Lion: The Tragedy of American-Iranian Relations . New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1988. [ Google Scholar ]
John L. Esposito. Islam and Politics . Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 1984, pp. 120–21. [ Google Scholar ]
Brad Hanson. “The ‘Westoxication’ of Iran: Depictions and Reactions of Behrangi,Āl-e Ahmad, and Shari‘ati.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 15 (1983): 1–23. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Frederick Mathewson Denny. An Introduction to Islam . Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005, p. 364. [ Google Scholar ]
Ruhollah Khomeini. “Message to the Pilgrims.” In Islam and Revolution: Writings and Declarations of Imam Khomeini (1941-1980) . Edited by Hamid Algar. Berkley, California: Mizan Press, 1981, pp. 195–99. [ Google Scholar ]
Hamid Dabashi. Theology of Discontent: The Ideological Foundation of the Islamic Revolution in Iran . New York: Transaction Publishers, 2006, p. 74. [ Google Scholar ]
S. Waqar Hasib. “The Iranian Constitution: An Exercise in Contradictions.” Al Nakhla . 2004, 3, pp. 1–12. http://fletcher.tufts.edu/Al-Nakhlah/Archives/~/media/Fletcher/Microsites/al%20Nakhlah/archives/pdfs/hasib.ashx .
Gregory S. Camp. Selling Fear: Conspiracy Theories and End-Times Paranoia . Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 1997. [ Google Scholar ]
Steve R. Rock. Faith and Foreign Policy: The Views and Influence of U.S. Christians and Christian Organizations . New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011, p. 145. [ Google Scholar ]
Michael Wala. The Council on Foreign Relations and American Foreign Policy in the Early Cold War . Providence, Rhode Island: Berghahn Books, 1994, p. xi. [ Google Scholar ]
Michael Barkun. “The ‘New World Order’ and American Exceptionalism.” In Mapping the End Times: American Evangelical Geopolitics and Apocalyptic Visions . Edited by Jason Dittmer and Tristan Sturm. Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing, 2010, pp. 119–32. [ Google Scholar ]
Grant R. Jeffrey. The Global Warming Deception: How a Secret Elite Plans to Bankrupt America and Steal Your Freedom . Colorado Springs, Colorado: Water Brooks Press, 2011, pp. 3–5, 187–88. [ Google Scholar ]
Noga Collins-Kreiner, Nurit Kliot, Yoel Mansfield, and Keren Sagi. Christian Tourism to the Holy Land: Pilgrimage During Security Crisis . Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing, 2006, p. xiii. [ Google Scholar ]
Anthony H. Cordesman. Saudi Arabia: National Security in a Troubled Region . Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2009, Volume 20, p. 274. [ Google Scholar ]
“ISAF Ensures Afghans’ Smooth Passage to Mecca.” The Maple Leaf . 2008, 11. http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/commun/ml-fe/article-eng.asp?id=4920 .

© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

Share and Cite

Herrington, L.M. Globalization and Religion in Historical Perspective: A Paradoxical Relationship. Religions 2013 , 4 , 145-165. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel4010145

Herrington LM. Globalization and Religion in Historical Perspective: A Paradoxical Relationship. Religions . 2013; 4(1):145-165. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel4010145

Herrington, Luke M. 2013. "Globalization and Religion in Historical Perspective: A Paradoxical Relationship" Religions 4, no. 1: 145-165. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel4010145

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

IMAGES

What is your analysis about the interconnectedness of geography,culture
PPT
Interconnectedness of Geography, Culture, and Religion
Complete the table by writing the interconnectedness of your religion
IWRBS 2 Module 2 Interconnectedness of Geography Culture and Religion
explain the poster about the unity of world religion in 100 words

VIDEO

Most populated religion in each continent! #geography #mapping #war #country
How Religions Spread Around The World
Which is the main religion of your country?
Religion ।। write an essay on religion in english ।। paragraph on religion ।। essay writing
Second Most common religion in Europe 🇪🇺GEO mapper#geography
Interconnectedness of Geography, Culture and Religion #origins of Religions Week 2

COMMENTS

Interconnectedness of geography,culture, and religion
question. Geography, culture and religion are interrelated. We are influenced by the cultures and areas we are from, whether it be with regard to religion or other beliefs. Geographical variables may unwittingly influence our ideas as we move and change locations throughout our lives, as well as throughout the formative years of our lives.
Module 2 Interconnectedness of Geography, Culture, and Religion
Module 2: Interconnectedness of Geography, Culture, and Religion VOCABULARY LIST. Let us find the meaning of words that you will encounter in the succeeding texts. Word Definition Adonai - ancient Hebrew God Allah - the one God of Islam Belief System. stories or ideas that define our personal sense of reality, and through which we make sense of ...
The Interconnectedness of Geography, Culture and Religions
The Interconnectedness of Geography, Culture and Religions. August 2, 2021. In this essay that is based on the lecture by Professor Jens Micah De Guzman, we will analyze the interconnectedness of geography, culture and religions. We can prove that geography, religion, and culture are practically interrelated. Geography influences religion, and ...
Interconnectedness of Geography, Culture, and Religion ...
HUMSS-IWRBS-Module-2-Interconnectedness-Of-Geography-Culture-And-Religion - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.
3.4 Geography of World Religions
Islam. Probably one of the most misunderstood religions in the world is Islam. Though predominantly centered in the Middle East and Northern Africa, Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world with 1.3 billion and is only second to Christianity is members. Islam is also divided into two major branches: Sunni and Shiite.
PDF RELIGION AND GEOGRAPHY
in the geography-religion interface. My own book Sacred Worlds: an introduction to Geography and Religion, was published in 1994. It explores the ways in which religion, its symbols, rites, beliefs and hopes have shaped the world in which we live. Two very different approaches have been adopted in recent work - 'religious geography' and ...
write a journal entry about your learning of the ...
Geography, culture and religion is interconnected amazingly. Religion significantly impacts culture as it affects and influences it in many vital ways. It can be proved that religion can considerably define the values, ideas, beliefs, heritage, and lifestyle of a society; all of which are essential constituents of culture.
Social change in modern times: how an interconnected world is affecting
In the modern age, globalisation takes the form of a kind of cultural globalisation, where social trends spread quickly across the world. This form of interconnectedness is hastened by social media platforms, which accelerate the homogenisation of culture in the global age. And it is for this reason, The Economist notes, that even in countries ...
Sacred Worlds
ABSTRACT. This book, the first in the field for two decades, looks at the relationships between geography and religion. It represents a synthesis of research by geographers of many countries, mainly since the 1960s. No previous book has tackled this emerging field from such a broad, interdisciplinary perspective, and never before have such a ...
Module 2 Interconnectedness of Geography Culture and Religion ...
1. Geography, culture, and religion are interconnected in many ways. The document discusses how geography influences religious practices and rituals related to burial rites, fasting, and clothing. 2. It also examines the commonalities between the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam which all worship one supreme being and revere prophets. 3. India is described as having a ...
Q&A: The relationship between religion and culture
For many people, religion is an important part of their identity and guides beliefs about what is true and right, and how to live one's best life. Also, many established religions have been around for a long time. Therefore, religious traditions could be a potentially important source of variation in cultural traits around the world.
Title: Geography of Religion; a cultural, geographical Analysis
Abstract: This research paper examine the geography of religion from a cultural, geographical. perspective. At first sight, Geography and religion can be con sidered as a phe nomenon that has no ...
Religion, Culture, and Communication
There is an interplay among religion, community, and culture. Community is essentially formed by a group of people who share common activities or beliefs based on their mutual affect, loyalty, and personal concerns. Participation in religious institutions is one of the most dominant community engagements worldwide.
Write an essay about How are religion and culture connected
Final answer: Religion and culture are closely connected, with religion playing a significant role in shaping the norms and practices of different societies. Religious affiliations are changing, reflecting the dynamic nature of culture and religion. Different cultures address universal existential questions through the shared aspects and the ...
How geography, culture and religion interplay in these ...
Final answer: Geography affects societies' development, which, combined with cultural factors, shape religious beliefs and practices. An example is the different Holy Week celebrations in Central America.Elsewhere, as in Asia, diverse cultures evolve under the influence of geography, and culture and religion interact to create unique interpretations of faith.
Interconnectedness of Geography, Culture and Religion
Time of Abraham, the patriarch of Israel. 2000 BCE. Three major monotheistic religions. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Played a major role in the establishment of the three monotheistic religions. The Patriarch Abraham. Judaism, Christianity and Islam are organized religions that are collectively known as ________.
thoroughly explained ideas of the interconnectedness of ...
Geography, culture, and religion are interconnected in various ways, influencing and shaping each other. Explanation: Here are some ideas to explain their interconnectedness: 1. Geographic factors influencing cultural practices: The physical environment, such as climate, landforms, and available resources, can greatly influence the culture of a ...
What is the interconnectedness of geography,culture and ...
Answer. Answer: Whether it is religion or other beliefs, we are influenced by the cultures and regions we are from. ... Geography does not only affect where particular religions or belief systems, such as the world's major faiths, are located but it can affect how specific beliefs are practiced and behaviors that it encourages. Explanation:
Interconnectedness of geography, culture, and religion?
Answer: interconnectedness of geography,culture, and. religion are interrelated. Explanation: we are influenced by the cultures and areas we are from.whether it be with regard to religion or other beliefs. geographical variables may unwittingly influence our ideas as we move and change locations throughout our live.as well as throughout the formative years of our lives.
Religions
Religion has long been a driving force in the process of globalization. This idea is not controversial or novel thinking, nor is it meant to be. However, the dominant reasoning on the subject of globalization, expressed by authors like Thomas Friedman, places economics at the center of analysis, skewing focus from the ideational factors at work in this process. By expanding the definition of ...
Full article: The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places
In The Changing World Religion Map, Brunn organized a collection of 207 articles by authors from a variety of disciplines. Their works examine, analyze, deconstruct established positions, explain the status of religious studies research, and pose questions for future research. Brunn has crafted a seminal five-volume body of work that provides ...
Lesson
The document discusses the interconnectedness of geography, culture, and religion by providing examples of how major world religions originated in sacred places and became intertwined with the cultures where they developed. Students are asked to brainstorm projects demonstrating the influence of religion on a selected culture. The document also includes a lesson on geography, culture, and ...
Make a poster on the interconnectedness of geography,culture ...
Make a poster on the interconnectedness of geography,culture religions . See answers. Advertisement. emersonearana465. geography of religion is the most common form of the equation for the reaction between us part man gud on the reaction. Advertisement. Uiiuu. Answer: