Journal of Accounting Education
Volume 4 • Issue 4
- ISSN: 0748-5751
Editor-In-Chief: Natalie Churyk
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality o… Read more
![journal of accounting education Journal of Accounting Education](https://shop.elsevier.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure-ecsd.elsevier.com%2Fcovers%2F80%2FTango2%2Flarge%2F07485751.jpg&w=384&q=75)
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Subscription options
Institutional subscription on sciencedirect.
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide.
The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
The Best Practices section includes individual and institutional practices related to, for example, student recruitment, student advising, student retention, alumni relations, and efforts to integrate accounting practice and accounting education. These articles are typically shorter in length than Main Section (i.e., research-based) articles. While such papers do not need evidence obtained on the basis of an experimental design (e.g., pre- versus post-test comparison), some evidence regarding the value or benefit of the best practice should be included, along with a discussion of relevant costs (out-of-pocket as well as opportunity costs, such as faculty time, practitioner involvement, etc.). Finally, note that the JAEd publishes manuscripts on all topics that are relevant to accounting education, including uses of technology, learning styles, assessment, curriculum, and faculty-related issues.
This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; others help us improve the user experience. By using the site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
- EXTRA CREDIT
![extra-credit-header-2018 extra-credit-header-2018](https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/content/jofa-home/newsletters/extra-credit/benefits-of-active-learning-strategies-in-classroom/_jcr_content/newsletterbanner.img.jpg/1604527311433.jpg)
Accounting education research reveals benefits of active learning strategies in the classroom
Try these active learning strategies in your courses..
- Accounting Education
The use of active learning strategies offers educators proven approaches to advance student learning. Trends in the literature point to a continued focus on the benefits of unique student projects, experiential learning, and the use of social media.
I have summarized a sampling of recent research in this area from top-ranked accounting education journals to provide key findings for busy educators. Citations are provided for those who want further details. A list of additional recent articles is included for those interested in reviewing other active learning strategies.
Experiential learning project prepares students for real-world audits
Jelinek, K. (2016). Wax on, wax off: Transfer of learning through an experiential learning project. Accounting Educators’ Journal, (26), 35-39.
The term “transfer of learning” refers to the application of knowledge, skills, or information received in one situation and successfully transferred to another. Author Kate Jelinek states that the theory, developed by Perkins and Saloman in 1992, is infrequently used in accounting education, and supports the use of active learning strategies, such as an experiential learning projects, to prepare students for future careers in the accounting profession.
Jelinek’s research relied on transfer of learning theories in a real-world learning project implemented in a graduate level, advanced auditing course. The project involved a review of attorneys’ expense reimbursements in federal court. The expenses were generated in association with an actual class action lawsuit where over 2,000 cases were filed, with specific restrictions and guidelines for reimbursable costs. Students performed “agreed-upon procedures” to determine if plaintiff attorneys complied with federal court guidelines for $2.5 million in expense reimbursements. The judge in charge of the case spoke to students in their classroom both before and after the project, demonstrating the significance and legitimacy of their work.
Before the project, instructors administered a pretest about student understanding of the project learning objectives. They compared results from the pretest to the test responses of students at the end of the project. The post-test revealed significant improvements in areas such as familiarity with sample selection, specific sampling techniques, and the required reports associated with the engagement, which suggests a strong transfer of learning and indicates increased student knowledge with actual audit techniques. Post-tests showed that students felt more prepared for real-world auditing, which prepared them to enter the profession, thus transferring the “overlapping tasks” of audit or agreed-upon procedures from the experiential class project to future experience with an actual audit.
The article provides several suggestions for classroom use, indicating that projects such as this can be an important way to supplement student internships, which considered the more traditional method of obtaining real-world experience. The author recommends contacting local nonprofit and governmental agencies for potential accounting projects. Jelinek also encourages faculty to stress the importance of real-world projects to students before they begin, possibly through a tour of the project location or, as in this situation, a visit from involved individuals associated with the project.
Active learning assignments improve pass rates and students’ skills
Huber, M., Law, D., & Khallaf, A. (2017). Active learning innovations in introductory financial accounting. Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations (21) 123–166.
Authors Martha Huber, Dave Law, and Ashraf Khallaf analyzed 10 years of data on student grades and pass/fail/withdraw rates before and after course modifications to their introductory financial accounting courses. They replaced their traditional course grading (such as homework, exams, and quizzes) with three new assignments. First, the “financial statements user interview” required students to explore the different ways financial statements are used in all areas of business. The “internal control paper” required students to select a company they had worked or volunteered for and to provide an analysis of whether it had strong or weak internal controls. Finally, the “financial statement analysis project,” which replaced the final exam, required students to work on a team project examining two publicly traded companies. The authors developed these assignments using the Pathways Commission’s call for accounting education change, the AICPA Core Competency Framework’s list of skills and competencies, and Dee Fink’s significant learning dimensions .
Results of their study showed a 12% increase in passing rates compared to the use of traditional assignments. Additionally, the study revealed that, based on students’ self-assessment at the end of the course, the innovative projects contributed more toward increasing students’ skills and competencies.
Surveys of both faculty and students revealed a more positive attitude in both teaching and participating in the revised introductory financial course. Students not only felt their competencies and skills increased compared to the traditional course, but also showed a greater appreciation for the profession.
Using social media to enhance managerial accounting courses
Holmes, A.F., & Rasmussen, S.J. (2018). Using Pinterest to stimulate student engagement, interest, and learning in managerial accounting courses. Journal of Accounting Education , 43, 43–56.
Students’ interest in social media presents a unique opportunity to engage them in their coursework. This study, by Amy Holmes and Stephanie Rasmussen, analyzes the use of Pinterest in an introductory managerial accounting course. They required students to “pin” an article, website, video, etc., from the internet to a Pinterest board related to the assigned course content. Each student needed to create one pin along with a description of the pin’s relevance. Additionally, students were required to comment on at least one other pin, with both requirements totaling 5% of the students’ grade.
The article analyzed 783 pins from 258 students attending two universities during the 2016–2017 academic year. It discusses how this assignment builds interest and provides a deeper understanding of managerial accounting concepts. Pins and other social media participation also were found to create interesting topics for class discussion and oral presentations.
Student surveys showed 71% of students thought the project was worthwhile with comments ranging from those that showed increased interest and impact, to negative feedback that the assignment was busy work, pointless, and too time-consuming. ESL (English as a second language) students showed the greatest interest and expressed the strongest positive benefits from the assignment, consistent with research on the learning styles of this student population. Based on the results of the study, the authors suggest that the use of a social media platform for course assignments enhances student interest and provides a positive impact on student understanding of complex accounting concepts.
Additional articles published on active learning strategies in accounting education
Accounting Education: An International Journal
Wynn-Williams, K., Beatson, N., & Anderson, C. (2016). The impact of unstructured case studies on surface learners: a study of second-year accounting students. Accounting Education , 25(3), 272–286.
Adelopo, I., Asante, J., Dart, E., & Rufai, I. (2017). Learning groups: the effects of group diversity on the quality of group reflection. Accounting Education , 26(5/6), 553–575.
Mihret, D.G., Abayadeera, N., Watty, K., & McKay, J. (2017). Teaching auditing using cases in an online learning environment: the role of ePortfolio assessment. Accounting Education , 26(4), 335–357.
Sithole, S. (2017). Instructional strategies and students’ performance in accounting: an evaluation of those strategies and the role of gender. Accounting Education, 27(6), 613–631
Bautista-Mesa, R., Molina Sánchez, H., & Ramírez Sobrino, J.N. (2018). Audit workplace simulations as a methodology to increase undergraduates’ awareness of competences. Accounting Education , 27(3), 234–258.
Coetzee, S.A., Schmulian, A., & Coetzee, R. (2018). Web conferencing-based tutorials: Student perceptions thereof and the effect on academic performance in accounting education . Accounting Education , 27(5), 531–546.
Cloete, M. (2018). The impact of an integrated assessment on the critical thinking skills of first-year university students. Accounting Education , 27(5), 479-494.
Peng, J., & Abdullah, I. (2018). Building a market simulation to teach business process analysis: effects of realism on engaged learning. Accounting Education , 27(2), 208–222.
Seow, J.L., & Shankar, P.L. (2018). Effects of team-skills guidance on accounting students with lone wolf tendencies. Accounting Education , 27 (3) 309-332
Sridharan, B., Muttakin, M.B., & Mihret, D.G. (2018). Students’ perceptions of peer assessment effectiveness: an explorative study. Accounting Education , 27(3), 259–285.
Advances in Accounting Education
Downen, T., & Hyde, B. (2016). Flipping the managerial accounting principles course: effects on student performance, evaluation, and attendance . Advances in Accounting Education (21) 61-87.
Wooten, T. (2016). Leveraging online testing to enhance student learning . Advances in Accounting Education (21) 141-163.
Issues in Accounting Education
Phillips, F. (2016). The power of giving feedback: Outcomes from implementing an online peer assessment system. Issues in Accounting Education , 31(1), 1–15.
Sudhakar, A., Tyler, J., & Wakefield, J. (2016). Enhancing student experience and performance through peer-assisted learning. Issues in Accounting Education , 31(3), 321-336.
Lento, C. (2017). Incorporating whiteboard voice-over video technology into the accounting curriculum. Issues in Accounting Education , 32(3), 153–168.
Riley, J., & Ward, K. (2017). Active learning, cooperative active learning, and passive learning methods in an accounting information systems course. Issues in Accounting Education , 32(2), 1–16.
Journal of Accounting Education
Bergner, J., Filzen, J.J., & Simkin, M.G. (2016 ). Why use multiple choice questions with excess information? Journal of Accounting Education , (34) 1–12.
Chan, S. H., Song, Q., Rivera, L. H., & Trongmateerut, P. (2016). Using an educational computer program to enhance student performance in financial accounting. Journal of Accounting Education , (36) 43–64.
Calabor, M.S., Mora, A., & Moya, S. (2018). The future of “serious games” in accounting education: A Delphi study. Journal of Accounting Education , (46) 43-52.
McCarthy, M., Kusaila, M., & Grasso, L. (2018). Intermediate accounting and auditing: Does course delivery mode impact student performance? Journal of Accounting Education , (46) 26-42.
The Accounting Educators’ Journal
C. Harrington, W. Smith, R. Bauer (2016). Influencing business student intent to use a personal budget. The Accounting Educators’ Journal , (26) 135-153.
Solsma, L.L., Njoroge, J., & Bartlett, G.D. (2018). The efficacy of online homework systems in introductory financial and managerial accounting courses. The Accounting Educator’s Journal , (28) 33-51.
— Cynthia Bolt-Lee, CPA , is head of the department of accounting and finance and professor of accounting at The Citadel, Charleston, S.C. To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact Courtney Vien, a JofA senior editor, at [email protected] .
Where to find August’s digital edition
![journal of accounting education journal of accounting education](https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/content/dam/jofa/issues/2024/aug/jofa-aug-24-cover-128x168.bmp)
The Journal of Accountancy is now completely digital.
SPONSORED REPORT
Manage the talent, hand off the HR headaches
Recruiting. Onboarding. Payroll administration. Compliance. Benefits management. These are just a few of the HR functions accounting firms must provide to stay competitive in the talent game.
FEATURED ARTICLE
Single-owner firms: The thrill of flying solo
CPAs piloting their own accounting practices share their challenges, successes, and lessons learned.
![journal of accounting education Segment Logo](https://aaahq.org/Portals/0/images/segments/AUD/logo.png)
Issues in Accounting Education A Quarterly Journal of the American Accounting Association
![journal of accounting education](https://aaahq.org/portals/0/images/journals/education.png)
Issues in Accounting Education publishes research, commentaries, and instructional resources that assist accounting faculty in teaching and that address important issues in accounting education. It prints quarterly in February, May, August, and November and is a top journal indexed in both Scopus and ESCI.
Click here to view the Issues in Accounting Education Editorial Board. For additional journal data and citation analysis, see the Issues in Accounting Education Journal Information Packet .
Senior Editor: Janet A. Samuels Issues in Accounting Education Arizona State University E: [email protected]
Editorial Office: [email protected]
AAA Senior Managing Editor: Nate Smith P: 941.556.4128 E: [email protected]
How to Submit a Manuscript:
Step 1 : Pay submission fee online (VISA, MasterCard, American Express). If you are unable to pay by credit card or have any questions, please contact the AAA Member Services Team at 941.921.7747 or [email protected] . You will need your invoice number, highlighted below in yellow, when submitting to the journal .
![journal of accounting education journal of accounting education](https://aaahq.org/portals/0/images/journals/payment_number_thumb.jpg)
Step 2 : After you receive your Order Confirmation , read the Editorial Policy and Manuscript Prep Guide to ensure your manuscript is ready for submission.
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Recommended pre-submission check: Paperpal Preflight
Prior to submitting, we recommend that you run your manuscript through the Paperpal Preflight screening tool, which instantly checks your manuscript, helps you address common errors and omissions, and performs a language quality review.
Step 3 : Submit manuscript to the Issues Peer Review System .
Additional Information
- Registered Reports – Submissions open Jan. 1, 2022 through March 31, 2022
- Diversity, Equity, and Social Justice in Accounting Education – Submissions due Nov. 30, 2021
Requests for reprint permission should be directed to the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com .
![journal of accounting education journal of accounting education](https://aaahq.org/portals/0/images/segments/aud/15587991-35.4.cover.jpg)
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory ( AJPT ) is available electronically to members of the Auditing Section. If you are a AAA member and would like to join the Auditing Section, please contact AAA Headquarters .
Continue Reading
![journal of accounting education journal of accounting education](https://aaahq.org/portals/0/images/journals/currentIssues.png)
Current Issues in Auditing
Current Issues in Auditing is published by the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association. To promote timely, widespread dissemination of ideas to the academic and practice communities, the journal is published online and is free to all interested parties.
Midyear Meeting
MARK YOUR CALENDAR FOR OUR 2025 MEETING!
January 16-18, 2025 | Charlotte, North Carolina
Please make plans to join us for the 2025 Auditing Section Midyear Meeting which will be held in Charlotte, North Carolina at The Westin Charlotte on January 16-18, 2025 .
We plan to offer a full conference experience, including a doctoral consortium, the Excellence in Auditing Education workshop, paper and plenary sessions, as well as many opportunities to connect with colleagues.
More information coming soon!
Calls For Papers
- Research Forum on Technology, Audits & Auditors
- Research Forum on the Role of Assurance in Non-Financial Reporting
- Shorter Papers
- Unexpected or Non-Significant Results in Experimental Research
Accounting Education
![journal of accounting education journal of accounting education](https://www.scimagojr.com/img/sir_white.png)
Subject Area and Category
Publication type.
09639284, 14684489
1992-1996, 1998, 2000-2023
Information
How to publish in this journal
![journal of accounting education journal of accounting education](https://www.scimagojr.com/img/comments_icon_black.png)
The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.
Category | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|
Accounting | 2009 | Q4 |
Accounting | 2010 | Q2 |
Accounting | 2011 | Q3 |
Accounting | 2012 | Q3 |
Accounting | 2013 | Q2 |
Accounting | 2014 | Q3 |
Accounting | 2015 | Q2 |
Accounting | 2016 | Q2 |
Accounting | 2017 | Q2 |
Accounting | 2018 | Q2 |
Accounting | 2019 | Q2 |
Accounting | 2020 | Q2 |
Accounting | 2021 | Q2 |
Accounting | 2022 | Q2 |
Accounting | 2023 | Q1 |
Education | 2009 | Q4 |
Education | 2010 | Q2 |
Education | 2011 | Q3 |
Education | 2012 | Q2 |
Education | 2013 | Q2 |
Education | 2014 | Q2 |
Education | 2015 | Q2 |
Education | 2016 | Q2 |
Education | 2017 | Q1 |
Education | 2018 | Q2 |
Education | 2019 | Q2 |
Education | 2020 | Q1 |
Education | 2021 | Q1 |
Education | 2022 | Q1 |
Education | 2023 | Q1 |
The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.
Year | SJR |
---|---|
2009 | 0.104 |
2010 | 0.586 |
2011 | 0.214 |
2012 | 0.414 |
2013 | 0.580 |
2014 | 0.437 |
2015 | 0.610 |
2016 | 0.518 |
2017 | 0.755 |
2018 | 0.576 |
2019 | 0.520 |
2020 | 0.868 |
2021 | 0.743 |
2022 | 0.721 |
2023 | 0.905 |
Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.
Year | Documents |
---|---|
2000 | 30 |
2001 | 39 |
2002 | 13 |
2003 | 29 |
2004 | 35 |
2005 | 39 |
2006 | 44 |
2007 | 43 |
2008 | 47 |
2009 | 37 |
2010 | 48 |
2011 | 55 |
2012 | 42 |
2013 | 51 |
2014 | 36 |
2015 | 32 |
2016 | 30 |
2017 | 28 |
2018 | 30 |
2019 | 28 |
2020 | 25 |
2021 | 26 |
2022 | 28 |
2023 | 64 |
This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.
Cites per document | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2000 | 0.077 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2001 | 0.097 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2002 | 0.143 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2003 | 0.793 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2004 | 0.829 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2005 | 0.319 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2006 | 0.612 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2007 | 0.966 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2008 | 0.571 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2009 | 0.491 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2010 | 1.298 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2011 | 0.606 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2012 | 0.807 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2013 | 1.874 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2014 | 1.260 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2015 | 1.283 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2016 | 0.913 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2017 | 1.436 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2018 | 1.317 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2019 | 1.833 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2020 | 2.517 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2021 | 2.802 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2022 | 4.220 |
Cites / Doc. (4 years) | 2023 | 5.888 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2000 | 0.000 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2001 | 0.097 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2002 | 0.145 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2003 | 0.793 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2004 | 0.778 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2005 | 0.312 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2006 | 0.515 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2007 | 0.864 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2008 | 0.341 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2009 | 0.507 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2010 | 1.134 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2011 | 0.621 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2012 | 0.750 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2013 | 1.959 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2014 | 1.027 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2015 | 1.326 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2016 | 0.882 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2017 | 1.541 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2018 | 1.378 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2019 | 1.875 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2020 | 2.407 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2021 | 3.133 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2022 | 4.380 |
Cites / Doc. (3 years) | 2023 | 6.456 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2000 | 0.000 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2001 | 0.100 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2002 | 0.145 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2003 | 0.731 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2004 | 0.381 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2005 | 0.281 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2006 | 0.419 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2007 | 0.458 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2008 | 0.287 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2009 | 0.289 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2010 | 1.012 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2011 | 0.624 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2012 | 0.670 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2013 | 1.753 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2014 | 0.763 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2015 | 1.356 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2016 | 0.956 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2017 | 1.790 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2018 | 1.310 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2019 | 1.776 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2020 | 2.397 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2021 | 3.472 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2022 | 5.078 |
Cites / Doc. (2 years) | 2023 | 5.426 |
Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Self Cites | 2000 | 0 |
Self Cites | 2001 | 3 |
Self Cites | 2002 | 3 |
Self Cites | 2003 | 4 |
Self Cites | 2004 | 41 |
Self Cites | 2005 | 11 |
Self Cites | 2006 | 29 |
Self Cites | 2007 | 9 |
Self Cites | 2008 | 13 |
Self Cites | 2009 | 10 |
Self Cites | 2010 | 12 |
Self Cites | 2011 | 22 |
Self Cites | 2012 | 40 |
Self Cites | 2013 | 80 |
Self Cites | 2014 | 35 |
Self Cites | 2015 | 23 |
Self Cites | 2016 | 15 |
Self Cites | 2017 | 22 |
Self Cites | 2018 | 18 |
Self Cites | 2019 | 16 |
Self Cites | 2020 | 39 |
Self Cites | 2021 | 42 |
Self Cites | 2022 | 46 |
Self Cites | 2023 | 105 |
Total Cites | 2000 | 0 |
Total Cites | 2001 | 3 |
Total Cites | 2002 | 10 |
Total Cites | 2003 | 65 |
Total Cites | 2004 | 63 |
Total Cites | 2005 | 24 |
Total Cites | 2006 | 53 |
Total Cites | 2007 | 102 |
Total Cites | 2008 | 43 |
Total Cites | 2009 | 68 |
Total Cites | 2010 | 144 |
Total Cites | 2011 | 82 |
Total Cites | 2012 | 105 |
Total Cites | 2013 | 284 |
Total Cites | 2014 | 152 |
Total Cites | 2015 | 171 |
Total Cites | 2016 | 105 |
Total Cites | 2017 | 151 |
Total Cites | 2018 | 124 |
Total Cites | 2019 | 165 |
Total Cites | 2020 | 207 |
Total Cites | 2021 | 260 |
Total Cites | 2022 | 346 |
Total Cites | 2023 | 510 |
Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.
Cites | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
External Cites per document | 2000 | 0.000 |
External Cites per document | 2001 | 0.000 |
External Cites per document | 2002 | 0.101 |
External Cites per document | 2003 | 0.744 |
External Cites per document | 2004 | 0.272 |
External Cites per document | 2005 | 0.169 |
External Cites per document | 2006 | 0.233 |
External Cites per document | 2007 | 0.788 |
External Cites per document | 2008 | 0.238 |
External Cites per document | 2009 | 0.433 |
External Cites per document | 2010 | 1.039 |
External Cites per document | 2011 | 0.455 |
External Cites per document | 2012 | 0.464 |
External Cites per document | 2013 | 1.407 |
External Cites per document | 2014 | 0.791 |
External Cites per document | 2015 | 1.147 |
External Cites per document | 2016 | 0.756 |
External Cites per document | 2017 | 1.316 |
External Cites per document | 2018 | 1.178 |
External Cites per document | 2019 | 1.693 |
External Cites per document | 2020 | 1.953 |
External Cites per document | 2021 | 2.627 |
External Cites per document | 2022 | 3.797 |
External Cites per document | 2023 | 5.127 |
Cites per document | 2000 | 0.000 |
Cites per document | 2001 | 0.097 |
Cites per document | 2002 | 0.145 |
Cites per document | 2003 | 0.793 |
Cites per document | 2004 | 0.778 |
Cites per document | 2005 | 0.312 |
Cites per document | 2006 | 0.515 |
Cites per document | 2007 | 0.864 |
Cites per document | 2008 | 0.341 |
Cites per document | 2009 | 0.507 |
Cites per document | 2010 | 1.134 |
Cites per document | 2011 | 0.621 |
Cites per document | 2012 | 0.750 |
Cites per document | 2013 | 1.959 |
Cites per document | 2014 | 1.027 |
Cites per document | 2015 | 1.326 |
Cites per document | 2016 | 0.882 |
Cites per document | 2017 | 1.541 |
Cites per document | 2018 | 1.378 |
Cites per document | 2019 | 1.875 |
Cites per document | 2020 | 2.407 |
Cites per document | 2021 | 3.133 |
Cites per document | 2022 | 4.380 |
Cites per document | 2023 | 6.456 |
International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.
Year | International Collaboration |
---|---|
2000 | 6.67 |
2001 | 10.26 |
2002 | 0.00 |
2003 | 10.34 |
2004 | 17.14 |
2005 | 5.13 |
2006 | 11.36 |
2007 | 2.33 |
2008 | 8.51 |
2009 | 8.11 |
2010 | 12.50 |
2011 | 7.27 |
2012 | 14.29 |
2013 | 15.69 |
2014 | 11.11 |
2015 | 18.75 |
2016 | 10.00 |
2017 | 3.57 |
2018 | 16.67 |
2019 | 10.71 |
2020 | 20.00 |
2021 | 34.62 |
2022 | 25.00 |
2023 | 20.31 |
Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Non-citable documents | 2000 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2001 | 13 |
Non-citable documents | 2002 | 29 |
Non-citable documents | 2003 | 30 |
Non-citable documents | 2004 | 19 |
Non-citable documents | 2005 | 4 |
Non-citable documents | 2006 | 18 |
Non-citable documents | 2007 | 32 |
Non-citable documents | 2008 | 57 |
Non-citable documents | 2009 | 60 |
Non-citable documents | 2010 | 55 |
Non-citable documents | 2011 | 44 |
Non-citable documents | 2012 | 35 |
Non-citable documents | 2013 | 33 |
Non-citable documents | 2014 | 21 |
Non-citable documents | 2015 | 13 |
Non-citable documents | 2016 | 5 |
Non-citable documents | 2017 | 2 |
Non-citable documents | 2018 | 3 |
Non-citable documents | 2019 | 5 |
Non-citable documents | 2020 | 5 |
Non-citable documents | 2021 | 3 |
Non-citable documents | 2022 | 1 |
Non-citable documents | 2023 | 0 |
Citable documents | 2000 | 0 |
Citable documents | 2001 | 18 |
Citable documents | 2002 | 40 |
Citable documents | 2003 | 52 |
Citable documents | 2004 | 62 |
Citable documents | 2005 | 73 |
Citable documents | 2006 | 85 |
Citable documents | 2007 | 86 |
Citable documents | 2008 | 69 |
Citable documents | 2009 | 74 |
Citable documents | 2010 | 72 |
Citable documents | 2011 | 88 |
Citable documents | 2012 | 105 |
Citable documents | 2013 | 112 |
Citable documents | 2014 | 127 |
Citable documents | 2015 | 116 |
Citable documents | 2016 | 114 |
Citable documents | 2017 | 96 |
Citable documents | 2018 | 87 |
Citable documents | 2019 | 83 |
Citable documents | 2020 | 81 |
Citable documents | 2021 | 80 |
Citable documents | 2022 | 78 |
Citable documents | 2023 | 79 |
Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Uncited documents | 2000 | 1 |
Uncited documents | 2001 | 29 |
Uncited documents | 2002 | 62 |
Uncited documents | 2003 | 22 |
Uncited documents | 2004 | 49 |
Uncited documents | 2005 | 60 |
Uncited documents | 2006 | 65 |
Uncited documents | 2007 | 54 |
Uncited documents | 2008 | 98 |
Uncited documents | 2009 | 97 |
Uncited documents | 2010 | 28 |
Uncited documents | 2011 | 81 |
Uncited documents | 2012 | 95 |
Uncited documents | 2013 | 22 |
Uncited documents | 2014 | 81 |
Uncited documents | 2015 | 35 |
Uncited documents | 2016 | 51 |
Uncited documents | 2017 | 24 |
Uncited documents | 2018 | 23 |
Uncited documents | 2019 | 19 |
Uncited documents | 2020 | 14 |
Uncited documents | 2021 | 18 |
Uncited documents | 2022 | 13 |
Uncited documents | 2023 | 6 |
Cited documents | 2000 | 0 |
Cited documents | 2001 | 2 |
Cited documents | 2002 | 7 |
Cited documents | 2003 | 60 |
Cited documents | 2004 | 32 |
Cited documents | 2005 | 17 |
Cited documents | 2006 | 38 |
Cited documents | 2007 | 64 |
Cited documents | 2008 | 28 |
Cited documents | 2009 | 37 |
Cited documents | 2010 | 99 |
Cited documents | 2011 | 51 |
Cited documents | 2012 | 45 |
Cited documents | 2013 | 123 |
Cited documents | 2014 | 67 |
Cited documents | 2015 | 94 |
Cited documents | 2016 | 68 |
Cited documents | 2017 | 74 |
Cited documents | 2018 | 67 |
Cited documents | 2019 | 69 |
Cited documents | 2020 | 72 |
Cited documents | 2021 | 65 |
Cited documents | 2022 | 66 |
Cited documents | 2023 | 73 |
Evolution of the percentage of female authors.
Year | Female Percent |
---|---|
2000 | 35.71 |
2001 | 29.73 |
2002 | 55.00 |
2003 | 50.88 |
2004 | 35.09 |
2005 | 32.50 |
2006 | 38.30 |
2007 | 48.57 |
2008 | 38.89 |
2009 | 44.68 |
2010 | 42.37 |
2011 | 44.44 |
2012 | 46.38 |
2013 | 48.72 |
2014 | 47.06 |
2015 | 45.31 |
2016 | 59.42 |
2017 | 50.94 |
2018 | 45.59 |
2019 | 45.16 |
2020 | 45.76 |
2021 | 52.05 |
2022 | 51.56 |
2023 | 47.34 |
Evolution of the number of documents cited by public policy documents according to Overton database.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
Overton | 2000 | 0 |
Overton | 2001 | 2 |
Overton | 2002 | 1 |
Overton | 2003 | 3 |
Overton | 2004 | 4 |
Overton | 2005 | 2 |
Overton | 2006 | 2 |
Overton | 2007 | 2 |
Overton | 2008 | 2 |
Overton | 2009 | 0 |
Overton | 2010 | 1 |
Overton | 2011 | 1 |
Overton | 2012 | 2 |
Overton | 2013 | 2 |
Overton | 2014 | 0 |
Overton | 2015 | 3 |
Overton | 2016 | 2 |
Overton | 2017 | 4 |
Overton | 2018 | 1 |
Overton | 2019 | 2 |
Overton | 2020 | 0 |
Overton | 2021 | 0 |
Overton | 2022 | 0 |
Overton | 2023 | 0 |
Evoution of the number of documents related to Sustainable Development Goals defined by United Nations. Available from 2018 onwards.
Documents | Year | Value |
---|---|---|
SDG | 2018 | 11 |
SDG | 2019 | 9 |
SDG | 2020 | 6 |
SDG | 2021 | 17 |
SDG | 2022 | 10 |
SDG | 2023 | 22 |
Leave a comment
Name * Required
Email (will not be published) * Required
* Required Cancel
The users of Scimago Journal & Country Rank have the possibility to dialogue through comments linked to a specific journal. The purpose is to have a forum in which general doubts about the processes of publication in the journal, experiences and other issues derived from the publication of papers are resolved. For topics on particular articles, maintain the dialogue through the usual channels with your editor.
![journal of accounting education Scimago Lab](https://www.scimagojr.com/./img/logo_footer.png)
Follow us on @ScimagoJR Scimago Lab , Copyright 2007-2024. Data Source: Scopus®
![journal of accounting education](https://www.scimagojr.com/./img/estmodusinrebus.png)
Cookie settings
Cookie Policy
Legal Notice
Privacy Policy
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
JAEd publishes empirical and non-empirical studies, instructional resources, and best practices on accounting education issues. The journal covers topics such as technology, learning styles, assessment, curriculum, and faculty-related issues.
2005 — Volume 23. Page 1 of 3. Read the latest articles of Journal of Accounting Education at ScienceDirect.com, Elsevier's leading platform of peer-reviewed scholarly literature.
Integrating data analytics into the auditing curriculum: Insights and perceptions from early-career auditors. Danielle D. Booker, Josette R.E. Pelzer, Jeremy R. Richardson. Article 100856. View PDF. Article preview. Read the latest articles of Journal of Accounting Education at ScienceDirect.com, Elsevier's leading platform of peer-reviewed ...
The Journal of Accounting Education is a refereed journal that publishes research and resources on accounting education issues. It has a high SJR ranking in the accounting and education categories, and covers empirical, policy, and case studies.
A refereed journal that publishes research and best practices on accounting education issues. It covers topics such as empirical studies, instructional resources, educational cases, and faculty-related issues.
Advances in Accounting Education (21) 61-87. Wooten, T. (2016). Leveraging online testing to enhance student learning. Advances in Accounting Education (21) 141-163. Issues in Accounting Education. Phillips, F. (2016). The power of giving feedback: Outcomes from implementing an online peer assessment system. Issues in Accounting Education, 31(1 ...
Journal of Accounting Education. In January 1988, the membership of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) approved all six proposals that constitute the Plan to ...
Accounting Education is a peer-reviewed international journal devoted to publishing research-based papers on key aspects of accounting education and training of relevance to practitioners, academics, trainers, students and professional bodies, particularly papers dealing with the effectiveness of accounting education or training.
About the Journal. The mission of Issues in Accounting Education is to advance accounting education by publishing educational research, case studies, learning strategies, and commentaries that (1) assist accounting faculty in teaching, program development, professional development, and assessment, and (2) encourage pedagogical experimentation and innovation based on learning science.
The Journal of Accounting Education Link to the Journal of Accounting Education homepage through ScienceDirect. Article Title Authors Volume Page Numbers What ethics lie Beyond Oil? Gia Chevis and Marty Stuebs Vol. 30, Issue 3-4 (2012) pp. 307-324 Teaching managerial responsibilities for internal controls: Perception gaps between accounting and ...
Accounting curricula and climate-related sustainability: evidence from Australia and New Zealand universities. Amrinder Khosa et al. Article | Published online: 9 Jul 2024. View all latest articles. Explore the current issue of Accounting Education, Volume 33, Issue 4, 2024.
JAEd is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research and practice in accounting education. It currently has no articles in press, but you can cite them using the year and DOI.
Projected bachelor's, master's, and PhD accounting enrollments were down 4%, 6%, and 23% in 2018 compared with 2016, respectively, and the number of new CPA exam candidates hit a 10-year low. The declining trends in accounting program enrollments should be of interest and concern to the PCAOB, SEC, FASB, GASB, and other leading authorities.
The Journal of Accounting Education's editor-in-chief, Natalie Churyk, put out a special call for research related to big data in 2016. There were 24 submissions, and 6 were ultimately published. The research published in the issue used descriptive and case study methodologies. There have been two additional articles related to big data since ...
The study from Al-Hattami's (Citation 2021) suggests including in the current accounting curriculum practical aspects on: professional and business values and ethics; implementing joint programs between universities and economic units in the labor market, which contribute to the development of the accounting curriculum; adequately preparing ...
Issues in Accounting Education publishes research, commentaries, and instructional resources that assist accounting faculty in teaching and that address important issues in accounting education. It prints quarterly in February, May, August, and November and is a top journal indexed in both Scopus and ESCI.
Best practices for group assessment tasks. Lyndie Bayne, Jacqueline Birt, Phil Hancock, Nikki Schonfeldt, Prerana Agrawal. Article 100770. View PDF. Article preview. Read the latest articles of Journal of Accounting Education at ScienceDirect.com, Elsevier's leading platform of peer-reviewed scholarly literature.
Scope. Accounting Education is a peer-reviewed international journal devoted to publishing research-based papers on key aspects of accounting education and training of relevance to practitioners, academics, trainers, students and professional bodies, particularly papers dealing with the effectiveness of accounting education or training.
Introduction. The paper raises concerns from practitioners about the relevance of accounting education in the context of a confluence of challenges arising in the fields of work and education, not least, pressures on faculty resources, substantive study costs in England and Wales, and a potential reduction in corporate accounting roles in large organisations.
What's the latest impact IF of the Journal of Accounting Education? Journal of Accounting Education latest impact IF is 2.29. It's evaluated in the year 2022. The highest and the lowest impact IF or impact score of this journal are 3.02 (2020) and 0.63 (2014), respectively, in the last 9 years. Moreover, its average IS is 1.78 in the previous 9 ...
Journal of Accounting Education (ACCEDU) occasionally publishes joint article collections in collaboration with other Elsevier journals, presenting papers that have been published in ACCEDU and one other title. This can be the case when several journals are covering one conference, or/and are publishing novel articles around one same topic. ...
ResearchGuide is created in order to improve, to facilitate, and to help researchers to find the best journals for their publications for their publications
We reviewed 185 accounting schools' websites, curricula, course descriptions, syllabi, and learning outcomes to determine if and how accounting departments incorporate data analytics into their curriculum. We also sent a survey to accounting professionals to seek their opinions regarding data analytics and STEM-designated accounting programs.
This study presents the outcomes of common web metrics and key performance indices of VillageMath, an online culture-based Instructional Content Repository for STEM learners and teachers. The study adopts a developmental research design. The developed intervention is accessible at (https://villagemath.net). Data collection on common web metrics and key performance indices (KPIs) was handled ...