- How to Order
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay User Icon](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2FuserIcon.5eaff246.webp&w=32&q=75)
Persuasive Essay Guide
Persuasive Essay About Abortion
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Caleb S.](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.myperfectwords.com%2Fwriters%2Fcaleb-s.png&w=96&q=75)
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
How To Write A Persuasive Essay On Abortion
10 min read
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Persuasive Essay About Abortion](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.myperfectwords.com%2Fblog%2Fpersuasive-essay-guide%2Fpersuasive-essay-about-abortion%2FPersuasive-Essay-About-Abortion-(2)-9248.jpg&w=640&q=75)
People also read
A Comprehensive Guide to Writing an Effective Persuasive Essay
A Catalogue of 300 Best Persuasive Essay Topics for Students
Persuasive Essay Outline - A Complete Guide
30+ Persuasive Essay Examples To Get You Started
Read Excellent Examples of Persuasive Essay About Gun Control
How to Write a Persuasive Essay About Covid19 | Examples & Tips
Learn to Write a Persuasive Essay About Business With 5 Best Examples
Check Out 14 Persuasive Essays About Online Education Examples
Persuasive Essay About Smoking - Making a Powerful Argument with Examples
Are you about to write a persuasive essay on abortion but wondering how to begin?
Writing an effective persuasive essay on the topic of abortion can be a difficult task for many students.
It is important to understand both sides of the issue and form an argument based on facts and logical reasoning. This requires research and understanding, which takes time and effort.
In this blog, we will provide you with some easy steps to craft a persuasive essay about abortion that is compelling and convincing. Moreover, we have included some example essays and interesting facts to read and get inspired by.
So let's start!
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Arrow Down](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2Farrow-down.10381593.webp&w=48&q=75)
- 1. How To Write a Persuasive Essay About Abortion?
- 2. Persuasive Essay About Abortion Examples
- 3. Examples of Argumentative Essay About Abortion
- 4. Persuasive Topics about Abortion
- 5. Facts About Abortion You Need to Know
How To Write a Persuasive Essay About Abortion?
Abortion is a controversial topic, with people having differing points of view and opinions on the matter. There are those who oppose abortion, while some people endorse pro-choice arguments.
It is also an emotionally charged subject, so you need to be extra careful when crafting your persuasive essay.
Before you start writing your persuasive essay, you need to understand the following steps.
Step 1: Choose Your Position
The first step to writing a persuasive essay on abortion is to decide your position. Do you support the practice or are you against it? You need to make sure that you have a clear opinion before you begin writing.
Once you have decided, research and find evidence that supports your position. This will help strengthen your argument.
Check out the video below to get more insights into this topic:
Step 2: Choose Your Audience
The next step is to decide who your audience will be. Will you write for pro-life or pro-choice individuals? Or both?
Knowing who you are writing for will guide your writing and help you include the most relevant facts and information. Additionally, understanding your audience will help you craft a focused thesis statement that clearly addresses their concerns and perspectives.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Order Essay](https://assets.myperfectwords.com/blog/persuasive-essay-guide/persuasive-essay-about-abortion/cta-img.png)
Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!
Step 3: Make an Outline & Define Argument
Now that you have chosen your position and identified your audience, it’s time to craft your argument. Start by clearly defining your stance on the issue and outlining the reasons behind your belief. Use evidence to support each of your claims, such as facts, statistics, or expert opinions.
To organize your thoughts, create a persuasive essay outline that maps out the structure of your essay.
For instance, your persuasive essay on abortion outline might include:
- Introduction: Present the topic and state your thesis.
- Body Paragraph 1: Explain your first supporting argument and provide evidence.
- Body Paragraph 2: Discuss your second supporting argument with additional evidence.
- Body Paragraph 3: Address opposing arguments and provide counterarguments to refute them.
- Conclusion: Summarize your main points and restate why your position is valid.
By outlining your essay, you ensure that your argument is logical and well-structured, making your essay more balanced and convincing.
Step 4: Format Your Essay
Once you have the argument ready, it is time to craft your persuasive essay. Follow a standard format for the essay , with an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.
Make sure that each paragraph is organized and flows smoothly. Use clear and concise language, getting straight to the point.
Step 5: Proofread and Edit
The last step in writing your persuasive essay is to make sure that you proofread and edit it carefully. Look for spelling, grammar, punctuation, or factual errors and correct them. This will help make your essay more professional and convincing.
These are the steps you need to follow when writing a persuasive essay on abortion. It is a good idea to read some examples before you start so you can know how they should be written.
Continue reading to find helpful examples.
Persuasive Essay About Abortion Examples
To help you get started, here are some example persuasive essays on abortion that may be useful for your own paper.
Abortion laws are a contentious issue, and persuasive arguments often revolve around the balance between individual rights and moral considerations. Advocates for more permissive abortion laws argue that these laws are essential for safeguarding women’s health and personal autonomy. Access to safe and legal abortion services allows individuals to make critical decisions about their own bodies and futures. Restrictive laws can lead to unsafe, unregulated procedures, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities and exacerbating health disparities. Moreover, persuasive arguments against overly restrictive abortion laws emphasize that personal circumstances vary widely. Women facing unplanned pregnancies may encounter complex situations, including health risks or severe financial hardship. In such cases, the ability to choose abortion can be crucial for their well-being and that of their families. Opponents of restrictive laws often argue that decisions about abortion should be made by individuals in consultation with their healthcare providers, rather than by lawmakers who may not fully understand the personal or medical intricacies involved. In conclusion, persuasive arguments for more flexible abortion laws highlight the importance of personal choice and access to safe medical procedures, advocating for a legal framework that respects individual rights and promotes public health. |
Here is another short persuasive essay about abortion:
Abortion remains one of the most polarizing issues in contemporary discourse, and a persuasive argument against it often centers on the moral and ethical considerations surrounding the sanctity of life. Opponents of abortion argue that life begins at conception and that every embryo or fetus has an inherent right to life. This perspective asserts that terminating a pregnancy is a profound moral wrong, akin to ending a human life. From a moral standpoint, many believe that the potential for human life deserves protection regardless of the circumstances surrounding conception. They argue that adoption presents a viable alternative for those who cannot or choose not to raise a child, ensuring that the unborn have the opportunity to live and contribute to society. Additionally, some argue that the availability of abortion can lead to a devaluation of human life in general. They contend that societies should focus on strengthening support systems for pregnant individuals, such as improved access to prenatal care and financial assistance, rather than offering abortion as an option. In conclusion, the argument against abortion emphasizes the ethical obligation to protect potential life and advocate for alternatives that respect both the unborn and the needs of individuals facing unplanned pregnancies. |
Persuasive Essay About No To Abortion
Persuasive Speech on Abortion
Legal Abortion Persuasive Essay
Persuasive Essay About Abortion in the Philippines
Persuasive Essay about legalizing abortion
You can also read m ore persuasive essay examples to imp rove your persuasive skills.
Examples of Argumentative Essay About Abortion
An argumentative essay is a type of essay that presents both sides of an argument. These essays rely heavily on logic and evidence.
Here are some examples of short argumentative essays with an introduction, body, and conclusion that you can use as a reference in writing your own argumentative essay.
The debate over whether abortion should be made illegal is a deeply divisive issue, marked by moral, ethical, and legal considerations. On one hand, proponents of making abortion illegal argue that it is a moral and ethical wrong, asserting that the fetus has a right to life from conception. They contend that every potential life should be protected, and that alternatives such as adoption provide viable options for those facing unwanted pregnancies. Conversely, those opposed to making abortion illegal argue that such a move would infringe on personal autonomy and reproductive rights. They believe that individuals should have the freedom to make decisions about their own bodies, including whether to continue or terminate a pregnancy. Making abortion illegal could lead to unsafe, unregulated procedures, disproportionately affecting low-income women and those without access to safe medical care. Historical evidence suggests that criminalizing abortion does not eliminate it but drives it underground, where it becomes much riskier. Ultimately, the debate centers on balancing ethical considerations with personal rights. While the protection of potential life is important, ensuring safe, legal access to abortion respects individual autonomy and public health. |
Let’s take a look at another short example:
Legalizing abortion remains one of the most contentious issues in modern society, with passionate arguments on both sides. Advocates for legalizing abortion assert that it is a fundamental right for individuals to have control over their own bodies. They argue that access to safe and legal abortion services is essential for protecting women’s health and autonomy. By legalizing abortion, individuals can make informed decisions based on their personal circumstances, including financial stability, health risks, and life goals. Additionally, legalizing abortion helps prevent unsafe, illegal procedures that can lead to severe health complications or even death. Historical data indicates that restrictive abortion laws do not eliminate abortions but drive them underground, where they become significantly more dangerous. On the other hand, opponents of legalization often argue that abortion ends a potential life and is therefore morally wrong. They advocate for alternatives such as adoption and assert that society has a responsibility to protect the unborn. However, the ethical and moral arguments must be balanced with practical considerations. Legalizing abortion ensures that individuals can access safe, regulated medical care and make personal decisions without facing undue risks. It respects the autonomy of individuals while also considering their health and well-being, making it a crucial component of a just and equitable society. |
Here are some PDF examples that you can download and read for free!
Abortion Persuasive Essay Introduction
Argumentative Essay About Abortion Conclusion
Argumentative Essay About Abortion Pdf
Argumentative Essay About Abortion in the Philippines
Argumentative Essay About Abortion - Introduction
Persuasive Topics about Abortion
If you are looking for some topics to write your persuasive essay on abortion, here are some examples:
- Should abortion be legal in the United States?
- Is it ethical to perform abortions, considering its pros and cons?
- What should be done to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies that lead to abortions?
- Is there a connection between abortion and psychological trauma?
- What are the ethical implications of abortion on demand?
- How has the debate over abortion changed over time?
- Should there be legal restrictions on late-term abortions?
- Does gender play a role in how people view abortion rights?
- Is it possible to reduce poverty and unwanted pregnancies through better sex education?
- How is the anti-abortion point of view affected by religious beliefs and values?
These are just some of the potential topics that you can use for your persuasive essay on abortion. Think carefully about the topic you want to write about and make sure it is something that interests you.
Check out m ore persuasive essay topics that will help you explore other things that you can write about!
Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!
Facts About Abortion You Need to Know
Here are some facts about abortion that will help you formulate better arguments.
- According to the Guttmacher Institute , 1 in 4 pregnancies end in abortion.
- The majority of abortions are performed in the first trimester.
- Abortion is one of the safest medical procedures, with less than a 0.5% risk of major complications.
- In the United States, 14 states have laws that restrict or ban abortion of most forms after 20 weeks gestation.
- Seven out of 198 nations allow elective abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
- In places where abortion is highly illegal, more women die during childbirth and due to complications resulting from pregnancy.
- A majority of pregnant women who opt for abortions do so for financial and social reasons.
- According to estimates, 56 million abortions occur annually.
In conclusion, these are some of the examples, steps, and topics that you can use to write a persuasive essay. Make sure to do your research thoroughly and back up your arguments with evidence. This will make your essay more professional and convincing.
Need the services of a persuasive essay writing service ? We've got your back!
MyPerfectWords.com provides help to students in the form of professionally written essays. Our persuasive essay writer can craft quality persuasive essays on any topic, including abortion.
So, just ask our experts ' do my essay ' and get professional help.
Frequently Asked Questions
How to start a persuasive essay about abortion.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay FAQ Icon](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2Ffaq-question-icon.aa95d27e.webp&w=96&q=75)
To start a persuasive essay about abortion, begin with a compelling introduction that grabs the reader's attention and clearly presents the topic. Provide some background information on the issue and state your thesis statement, which should outline your position on the matter. Ensure your introduction sets up the argument you will be making throughout the essay.
What is a good argument for abortion?
A good argument for abortion could be that it is a woman’s choice to choose whether or not to have an abortion. It is also important to consider the potential risks of carrying a pregnancy to term.
What is a good hook for an essay about abortion?
A good hook for an essay might involve a thought-provoking question, a startling statistic, or a powerful quote. For example:
- "Did you know that nearly one in four women will have an abortion by age 45? This staggering statistic highlights the urgency of the abortion debate."
- "‘The right to choose is fundamental,’ argues many pro-choice advocates. But how does this stand against the moral objections of pro-life supporters?"
What is a persuasive speech about legalizing abortion?
A persuasive speech about legalizing abortion argues for the importance of granting individuals the right to make autonomous decisions regarding their reproductive health. It emphasizes that legalizing abortion ensures safe, regulated medical procedures, protects women's health, and supports personal autonomy. The speech often highlights the risks associated with illegal abortions, the need for access to healthcare, and the ethical consideration of allowing individuals to choose based on their unique circumstances.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay AI Essay Bot](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2Fai-bot.ab29c1e6.png&w=640&q=75)
Write Essay Within 60 Seconds!
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Caleb S.](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.myperfectwords.com%2Fwriters%2Fcaleb-s.png&w=256&q=75)
Caleb S. has been providing writing services for over five years and has a Masters degree from Oxford University. He is an expert in his craft and takes great pride in helping students achieve their academic goals. Caleb is a dedicated professional who always puts his clients first.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Get Help](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=%2F_next%2Fstatic%2Fmedia%2Fget-help-new.761ad6e7.webp&w=384&q=75)
Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!
Keep reading
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Persuasive Essay](https://myperfectwords.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.myperfectwords.com%2Fblog%2Fpersuasive-essay-guide%2FPersuasive-Essay-9165.jpg&w=828&q=75)
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Encyclopedia Britannica](https://cdn.britannica.com/mendel/eb-logo/MendelNewThistleLogo.png)
- History & Society
- Science & Tech
- Biographies
- Animals & Nature
- Geography & Travel
- Arts & Culture
- Games & Quizzes
- On This Day
- One Good Fact
- New Articles
- Lifestyles & Social Issues
- Philosophy & Religion
- Politics, Law & Government
- World History
- Health & Medicine
- Browse Biographies
- Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
- Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
- Environment
- Fossils & Geologic Time
- Entertainment & Pop Culture
- Sports & Recreation
- Visual Arts
- Demystified
- Image Galleries
- Infographics
- Top Questions
- Britannica Kids
- Saving Earth
- Space Next 50
- Student Center
Pro and Con: Abortion
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Washington DC.,USA, April 26, 1989. Supporters for and against legal abortion face off during a protest outside the United States Supreme Court Building during Webster V Health Services](https://cdn.britannica.com/72/204572-050-4708CA63/Abortion-demonstration-United-States-Supreme-Court-building-Washington-DC-1989.jpg?w=600&q=60)
To access extended pro and con arguments, sources, and discussion questions about whether abortion should be legal, go to ProCon.org .
The debate over whether abortion should be a legal option has long divided people around the world. Split into two groups, pro-choice and pro-life, the two sides frequently clash in protests.
A June 2, 2022 Gallup poll , 55% of Americans identified as “pro-choice,” the highest percentage since 1995. 39% identified as “pro-life,” and 5% were neither or unsure. For the first time in the history of the poll question (since 2001), 52% of Americans believe abortion is morally acceptable. 38% believed the procedure to be morally wrong, and 10% answered that it depended on the situation or they were unsure.
Surgical abortion (aka suction curettage or vacuum curettage) is the most common type of abortion procedure. It involves using a suction device to remove the contents of a pregnant woman’s uterus. Surgical abortion performed later in pregnancy (after 12-16 weeks) is called D&E (dilation and evacuation). The second most common abortion procedure, a medical abortion (aka an “abortion pill”), involves taking medications, usually mifepristone and misoprostol (aka RU-486), within the first seven to nine weeks of pregnancy to induce an abortion. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that 67% of abortions performed in 2014 were performed at or less than eight weeks’ gestation, and 91.5% were performed at or less than 13 weeks’ gestation. 77.3% were performed by surgical procedure, while 22.6% were medical abortions. An abortion can cost from $500 to over $1,000 depending on where it is performed and how long into the pregnancy it is.
- Abortion is a safe medical procedure that protects lives.
- Abortion bans endangers healthcare for those not seeking abortions.
- Abortion bans deny bodily autonomy, creating wide-ranging repercussions.
- Life begins at conception, making abortion murder.
- Legal abortion promotes a culture in which life is disposable.
- Increased access to birth control, health insurance, and sexual education would make abortion unnecessary.
This article was published on June 24, 2022, at Britannica’s ProCon.org , a nonpartisan issue-information source.
Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World
Read our research on:
Full Topic List
Regions & Countries
- Publications
- Our Methods
- Short Reads
- Tools & Resources
Read Our Research On:
Pro-Choice Does Not Mean Pro-Abortion: An Argument for Abortion Rights Featuring the Rev. Carlton Veazey
Since the Supreme Court’s historic 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade , the issue of a woman’s right to an abortion has fostered one of the most contentious moral and political debates in America. Opponents of abortion rights argue that life begins at conception – making abortion tantamount to homicide. Abortion rights advocates, in contrast, maintain that women have a right to decide what happens to their bodies – sometimes without any restrictions.
To explore the case for abortion rights, the Pew Forum turns to the Rev. Carlton W. Veazey, who for more than a decade has been president of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice. Based in Washington, D.C., the coalition advocates for reproductive choice and religious freedom on behalf of about 40 religious groups and organizations. Prior to joining the coalition, Veazey spent 33 years as a pastor at Zion Baptist Church in Washington, D.C.
A counterargument explaining the case against abortion rights is made by the Rev. J. Daniel Mindling, professor of moral theology at Mount St. Mary’s Seminary.
Featuring: The Rev. Carlton W. Veazey, President, Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice
Interviewer: David Masci, Senior Research Fellow, Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
Question & Answer
Can you explain how your Christian faith informs your views in support of abortion rights?
I grew up in a Christian home. My father was a Baptist minister for many years in Memphis, Tenn. One of the things that he instilled in me – I used to hear it so much – was free will, free will, free will. It was ingrained in me that you have the ability to make choices. You have the ability to decide what you want to do. You are responsible for your decisions, but God has given you that responsibility, that option to make decisions.
I had firsthand experience of seeing black women and poor women being disproportionately impacted by the fact that they had no choices about an unintended pregnancy, even if it would damage their health or cause great hardship in their family. And I remember some of them being maimed in back-alley abortions; some of them died. There was no legal choice before Roe v. Wade .
But in this day and time, we have a clearer understanding that men and women are moral agents and equipped to make decisions about even the most difficult and complex matters. We must ensure a woman can determine when and whether to have children according to her own conscience and religious beliefs and without governmental interference or coercion. We must also ensure that women have the resources to have a healthy, safe pregnancy, if that is their decision, and that women and families have the resources to raise a child with security.
The right to choose has changed and expanded over the years since Roe v. Wade . We now speak of reproductive justice – and that includes comprehensive sex education, family planning and contraception, adequate medical care, a safe environment, the ability to continue a pregnancy and the resources that make that choice possible. That is my moral framework.
You talk about free will, and as a Christian you believe in free will. But you also said that God gave us free will and gave us the opportunity to make right and wrong choices. Why do you believe that abortion can, at least in some instances, be the right choice?
Dan Maguire, a former Jesuit priest and professor of moral theology and ethics at Marquette University, says that to have a child can be a sacred choice, but to not have a child can also be a sacred choice.
And these choices revolve around circumstances and issues – like whether a person is old enough to care for a child or whether a woman already has more children than she can care for. Also, remember that medical circumstances are the reason many women have an abortion – for example, if they are having chemotherapy for cancer or have a life-threatening chronic illness – and most later-term abortions occur because of fetal abnormalities that will result in stillbirth or the death of the child. These are difficult decisions; they’re moral decisions, sometimes requiring a woman to decide if she will risk her life for a pregnancy.
Abortion is a very serious decision and each decision depends on circumstances. That’s why I tell people: I am not pro-abortion, I am pro-choice. And that’s an important distinction.
You’ve talked about the right of a woman to make a choice. Does the fetus have any rights?
First, let me say that the religious, pro-choice position is based on respect for human life, including potential life and existing life.
But I do not believe that life as we know it starts at conception. I am troubled by the implications of a fetus having legal rights because that could pit the fetus against the woman carrying the fetus; for example, if the woman needed a medical procedure, the law could require the fetus to be considered separately and equally.
From a religious perspective, it’s more important to consider the moral issues involved in making a decision about abortion. Also, it’s important to remember that religious traditions have very different ideas about the status of the fetus. Roman Catholic doctrine regards a fertilized egg as a human being. Judaism holds that life begins with the first breath.
What about at the very end of a woman’s pregnancy? Does a fetus acquire rights after the point of viability, when it can survive outside the womb? Or let me ask it another way: Assuming a woman is healthy and her fetus is healthy, should the woman be able to terminate her pregnancy until the end of her pregnancy?
There’s an assumption that a woman would end a viable pregnancy carelessly or without a reason. The facts don’t bear this out. Most abortions are performed in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. Late abortions are virtually always performed for the most serious medical and health reasons, including saving the woman’s life.
But what if such a case came before you? If you were that woman’s pastor, what would you say?
I would talk to her in a helpful, positive, respectful way and help her discuss what was troubling her. I would suggest alternatives such as adoption.
Let me shift gears a little bit. Many Americans have said they favor a compromise, or reaching a middle-ground policy, on abortion. Do you sympathize with this desire and do you think that both sides should compromise to end this rancorous debate?
I have been to more middle-ground and common-ground meetings than I can remember and I’ve never been to one where we walked out with any decision.
That being said, I think that we all should agree that abortion should be rare. How do we do that? We do that by providing comprehensive sex education in schools and in religious congregations and by ensuring that there is accurate information about contraception and that contraception is available. Unfortunately, the U.S. Congress has not been willing to pass a bill to fund comprehensive sex education, but they are willing to put a lot of money into failed and harmful abstinence-only programs that often rely on scare tactics and inaccurate information.
Former Surgeon General David Satcher has shown that abstinence-only programs do not work and that we should provide young people with the information to protect themselves. Education that stresses abstinence and provides accurate information about contraception will reduce the abortion rate. That is the ground that I stand on. I would say that here is a way we can work together to reduce the need for abortions.
Abortion has become central to what many people call the “culture wars.” Some consider it to be the most contentious moral issue in America today. Why do many Catholics, evangelical Christians and other people of faith disagree with you?
I was raised to respect differing views so the rigid views against abortion are hard for me to understand. I will often tell someone on the other side, “I respect you. I may disagree with your theological perspective, but I respect your views. But I think it’s totally arrogant for you to tell me that I need to believe what you believe.” It’s not that I think we should not try to win each other over. But we have to respect people’s different religious beliefs.
But what about people who believe that life begins at conception and that terminating a pregnancy is murder? For them, it may not just be about respecting or tolerating each other’s viewpoints; they believe this is an issue of life or death. What do you say to people who make that kind of argument?
I would say that they have a right to their beliefs, as do I. I would try to explain that my views are grounded in my religion, as are theirs. I believe that we must ensure that women are treated with dignity and respect and that women are able to follow the dictates of their conscience – and that includes their reproductive decisions. Ultimately, it is the government’s responsibility to ensure that women have the ability to make decisions of conscience and have access to reproductive health services.
Some in the anti-abortion camp contend that the existence of legalized abortion is a sign of the self-centeredness and selfishness of our age. Is there any validity to this view?
Although abortion is a very difficult decision, it can be the most responsible decision a person can make when faced with an unintended pregnancy or a pregnancy that will have serious health consequences.
Depending on the circumstances, it might be selfish to bring a child into the world. You know, a lot of people say, “You must bring this child into the world.” They are 100 percent supportive while the child is in the womb. As soon as the child is born, they abort the child in other ways. They abort a child through lack of health care, lack of education, lack of housing, and through poverty, which can drive a child into drugs or the criminal justice system.
So is it selfish to bring children into the world and not care for them? I think the other side can be very selfish by neglecting the children we have already. For all practical purposes, children whom we are neglecting are being aborted.
This transcript has been edited for clarity, spelling and grammar.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings
Sign up for The Briefing
Weekly updates on the world of news & information
- Religion & Abortion
- Religion & Social Values
Cultural Issues and the 2024 Election
Support for legal abortion is widespread in many places, especially in europe, public opinion on abortion, americans overwhelmingly say access to ivf is a good thing, broad public support for legal abortion persists 2 years after dobbs, most popular.
901 E St. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20004 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 | Media Inquiries
Research Topics
- Email Newsletters
ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts .
© 2024 Pew Research Center
There’s a Better Way to Debate Abortion
Caution and epistemic humility can guide our approach.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Opponents and proponents of abortion arguing outside the Supreme Court](https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/p9LT3xt1iguFYuZtNu_gYsxczhw=/0x9:2375x1345/960x540/media/img/mt/2022/05/GettyImages_1240465483/original.jpg)
If Justice Samuel Alito’s draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization becomes law, we will enter a post– Roe v. Wade world in which the laws governing abortion will be legislatively decided in 50 states.
In the short term, at least, the abortion debate will become even more inflamed than it has been. Overturning Roe , after all, would be a profound change not just in the law but in many people’s lives, shattering the assumption of millions of Americans that they have a constitutional right to an abortion.
This doesn’t mean Roe was correct. For the reasons Alito lays out, I believe that Roe was a terribly misguided decision, and that a wiser course would have been for the issue of abortion to have been given a democratic outlet, allowing even the losers “the satisfaction of a fair hearing and an honest fight,” in the words of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Instead, for nearly half a century, Roe has been the law of the land. But even those who would welcome its undoing should acknowledge that its reversal could convulse the nation.
From the December 2019 issue: The dishonesty of the abortion debate
If we are going to debate abortion in every state, given how fractured and angry America is today, we need caution and epistemic humility to guide our approach.
We can start by acknowledging the inescapable ambiguities in this staggeringly complicated moral question. No matter one’s position on abortion, each of us should recognize that those who hold views different from our own have some valid points, and that the positions we embrace raise complicated issues. That realization alone should lead us to engage in this debate with a little more tolerance and a bit less certitude.
Many of those on the pro-life side exhibit a gap between the rhetoric they employ and the conclusions they actually seem to draw. In the 1990s, I had an exchange, via fax, with a pro-life thinker. During our dialogue, I pressed him on what he believed, morally speaking , should be the legal penalty for a woman who has an abortion and a doctor who performs one.
My point was a simple one: If he believed, as he claimed, that an abortion even moments after conception is the killing of an innocent child—that the fetus, from the instant of conception, is a human being deserving of all the moral and political rights granted to your neighbor next door—then the act ought to be treated, if not as murder, at least as manslaughter. Surely, given what my interlocutor considered to be the gravity of the offense, fining the doctor and taking no action against the mother would be morally incongruent. He was understandably uncomfortable with this line of questioning, unwilling to go to the places his premises led. When it comes to abortion, few people are.
Humane pro-life advocates respond that while an abortion is the taking of a human life, the woman having the abortion has been misled by our degraded culture into denying the humanity of the child. She is a victim of misinformation; she can’t be held accountable for what she doesn’t know. I’m not unsympathetic to this argument, but I think it ultimately falls short. In other contexts, insisting that people who committed atrocities because they truly believed the people against whom they were committing atrocities were less than human should be let off the hook doesn’t carry the day. I’m struggling to understand why it would in this context.
There are other complicating matters. For example, about half of all fertilized eggs are aborted spontaneously —that is, result in miscarriage—usually before the woman knows she is pregnant. Focus on the Family, an influential Christian ministry, is emphatic : “Human life begins at fertilization.” Does this mean that when a fertilized egg is spontaneously aborted, it is comparable—biologically, morally, ethically, or in any other way—to when a 2-year-old child dies? If not, why not? There’s also the matter of those who are pro-life and contend that abortion is the killing of an innocent human being but allow for exceptions in the case of rape or incest. That is an understandable impulse but I don’t think it’s a logically sustainable one.
The pro-choice side, for its part, seldom focuses on late-term abortions. Let’s grant that late-term abortions are very rare. But the question remains: Is there any point during gestation when pro-choice advocates would say “slow down” or “stop”—and if so, on what grounds? Or do they believe, in principle, that aborting a child up to the point of delivery is a defensible and justifiable act; that an abortion procedure is, ethically speaking, the same as removing an appendix? If not, are those who are pro-choice willing to say, as do most Americans, that the procedure gets more ethically problematic the further along in a pregnancy?
Read: When a right becomes a privilege
Plenty of people who consider themselves pro-choice have over the years put on their refrigerator door sonograms of the baby they are expecting. That tells us something. So does biology. The human embryo is a human organism, with the genetic makeup of a human being. “The argument, in which thoughtful people differ, is about the moral significance and hence the proper legal status of life in its early stages,” as the columnist George Will put it.
These are not “gotcha questions”; they are ones I have struggled with for as long as I’ve thought through where I stand on abortion, and I’ve tried to remain open to corrections in my thinking. I’m not comfortable with those who are unwilling to grant any concessions to the other side or acknowledge difficulties inherent in their own position. But I’m not comfortable with my own position, either—thinking about abortion taking place on a continuum, and troubled by abortions, particularly later in pregnancy, as the child develops.
The question I can’t answer is where the moral inflection point is, when the fetus starts to have claims of its own, including the right to life. Does it depend on fetal development? If so, what aspect of fetal development? Brain waves? Feeling pain? Dreaming? The development of the spine? Viability outside the womb? Something else? Any line I might draw seems to me entirely arbitrary and capricious.
Because of that, I consider myself pro-life, but with caveats. My inability to identify a clear demarcation point—when a fetus becomes a person—argues for erring on the side of protecting the unborn. But it’s a prudential judgment, hardly a certain one.
At the same time, even if one believes that the moral needle ought to lean in the direction of protecting the unborn from abortion, that doesn’t mean one should be indifferent to the enormous burden on the woman who is carrying the child and seeks an abortion, including women who discover that their unborn child has severe birth defects. Nor does it mean that all of us who are disturbed by abortion believe it is the equivalent of killing a child after birth. In this respect, my view is similar to that of some Jewish authorities , who hold that until delivery, a fetus is considered a part of the mother’s body, although it does possess certain characteristics of a person and has value. But an early-term abortion is not equivalent to killing a young child. (Many of those who hold this position base their views in part on Exodus 21, in which a miscarriage that results from men fighting and pushing a pregnant woman is punished by a fine, but the person responsible for the miscarriage is not tried for murder.)
“There is not the slightest recognition on either side that abortion might be at the limits of our empirical and moral knowledge,” the columnist Charles Krauthammer wrote in 1985. “The problem starts with an awesome mystery: the transformation of two soulless cells into a living human being. That leads to an insoluble empirical question: How and exactly when does that occur? On that, in turn, hangs the moral issue: What are the claims of the entity undergoing that transformation?”
That strikes me as right; with abortion, we’re dealing with an awesome mystery and insoluble empirical questions. Which means that rather than hurling invective at one another and caricaturing those with whom we disagree, we should try to understand their views, acknowledge our limitations, and even show a touch of grace and empathy. In this nation, riven and pulsating with hate, that’s not the direction the debate is most likely to take. But that doesn’t excuse us from trying.
About the Author
More Stories
Joe Biden Made the Right Choice
Joe Biden Tries to Calm the Waters
- Search Menu
- Sign in through your institution
- Special Issues
- Author Guidelines
- Submission Site
- Open Access
- About Journal of Law and the Biosciences
- About the Duke University School of Law
- About the Harvard Law School
- About Stanford Law School
- Editorial Board
- Advertising and Corporate Services
- Journals Career Network
- Self-Archiving Policy
- Journals on Oxford Academic
- Books on Oxford Academic
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Issue Cover](https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup/backfile/Content_public/Journal/jlb/Issue/9/1/17/m_cover.jpeg?Expires=1725238111&Signature=FHlgU4L0K0RW61TvZVXNW0WQDmKiBXLC~dEaC24oisf8Yae803lmMLQIYnHivGoTPk7erJoQXqXbA7jzcGW3gmUxKyAPdIajpDbSNhs-ST6Qp5H5AEY~HD2p1CEKLiR8SQC3JUI5W926ggx67nDr2nI0pzoN9R-AP0i6W7VD0Z2Jnk6NRbWGm28X2O~ISEF0qAlpGdjjOmWIde~r4EsKXB2ItGFugwKwRfI4qCfElc6iEwM4mA65vZhutgi9Kmlwbv9zpyABH31-ymt29UUN6itWhKeYO96KQFUvH1CHHwtRq~j94LEMbXGIo9EHwT2xk9qiWJi3TkdT3A0piY916A__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
Article Contents
I. the hope that abortion bans will deter abortion, ii. the hope that abortion bans will send a message, iii. the hope that abortion bans will be competently implemented and enforced, iv. conclusion, acknowledgements, ethics approval statement.
- < Previous
What will and won’t happen when abortion is banned
Katharine & George Alexander Professor of Law, Santa Clara University School of Law.
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Supplementary Data
Michelle Oberman, What will and won’t happen when abortion is banned, Journal of Law and the Biosciences , Volume 9, Issue 1, January-June 2022, lsac011, https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac011
- Permissions Icon Permissions
For the past 50 years, abortion opponents have fought for the power to ban abortion without little attention to how things might change when they won. The battle to make abortion illegal has been predicated on three nebulous assumptions about how abortion bans work. First, supporters believe banning abortion will deter it. Second, they hope bans will send a message about abortion—specifically, that abortion is immoral. And third, they expect bans to be competently implemented and enforced. Drawing on empirical work from within and outside of the U.S., this Article offers an evidence-based assessment of each of these assumptions. Part One examines the question of deterrence by exploring findings from countries with relatively high and relatively low abortion rates. After explaining why restrictive abortion laws alone do not reduce aggregate abortion rates, I consider the matter of individual deterrence. By identifying those most likely to be deterred by U.S. abortion bans, I illustrate how abortion bans intersect with structural inequalities to disproportionately impact poor women of color and their children. Part Two tests the idea that abortion bans send a message. I consider the bans’ meaning in context with U.S. laws and policies affecting families, exposing the difference between laws discouraging abortion, and those encouraging childbirth. Then, drawing from literature on the expressive function of the law, I assess the limits on the message-sending capacity of abortion bans in a society divided over abortion and over its commitment to children living in poverty. Part Three turns to the expectation that abortion bans will be competently enforced, noting the legitimacy struggles arising from law enforcement patterns, along with the administrative challenges inherent in overseeing the various exceptions to abortion bans. This article concludes by considering why the consequences and limitations of abortion bans should matter to supporters and opponents, alike.
For the past 50 years, abortion opponents have fought for the power to ban abortion without paying much mind to the details of how things might change when they won. The battle to make abortion illegal has been waged over a surprisingly nebulous assumption that banning abortion would, in itself, lead to meaningful changes in the practice of abortion in America. It has been a policy based on hopes and prayers, rather than on actual evidence about how restrictive abortion laws work in practice.
When the law on the ‘books’ changes in the United States, what might the law on the ground look like? Drawing on empirical work from within and outside of the USA, this article offers an evidence-based answer to the question of what will and would not happen where abortion is banned.
In the spirit of full disclosure, like almost everyone who engages with the abortion war, I have a bias: I am an unambivalent supporter of abortion rights. Nonetheless, I strive in this article to maintain a tone that I hope will permit readers who disagree with me to hear my message. I do so because those on all sides of our abortion war should care about it. For 50 years, the USA abortion war has been fought almost exclusively around the issue of legalization. 1 Yet all evidence suggests the changes likely to be wrought by banning abortion should leave even ardent supporters of abortion bans not just disappointed, but profoundly disturbed by their downstream consequences.
The question of how abortion bans work in practice is a live one among abortion-rights advocates, with many, (including myself), working to identify what happens, and to whom, so as to permit advocates and policy makers to mitigate their harsh impact on the vulnerable. 2 By contrast, anti-abortion Americans who have spent decades working to enact such laws have paid relatively little attention to how things actually change when abortion is illegal. Instead, they have rested their support for outlawing abortion on three general assumptions about how abortion bans will work. First, they believe banning abortion will deter it. 3 Second, they hope the bans will send a message about abortion—specifically, that abortion is immoral. 4 And third, they expect the laws will be competently implemented and enforced. 5
This article interrogates each of these expectations. Part One begins its consideration of the question of deterrence by exploring research from countries with relatively high and relatively low abortion rates. This comparison offers powerful evidence that restrictive abortion laws alone do not reduce abortion rates. But while outlawing abortion is unlikely to cause an aggregate decline in abortion rates, bans will cause some to carry to term pregnancies they might otherwise have aborted. 6 This section concludes with an examination of how abortion bans intersect with structural inequalities to disproportionately impact poor women of color and their children–already the most vulnerable and marginalized Americans.
Part Two tests the assumption that outlawing abortion will send a message that abortion is morally wrong, thereby helping to foster a culture that rejects abortion as an option. This section considers the messages sent by US abortion bans by placing them in context with our laws and policies that inform when and whether people seek abortions. Then, drawing from literature on the expressive function of the law, this section explores the practical and symbolic limits on the message-sending capacity of abortion bans in a society divided over abortion and over its commitments to children living in poverty.
Part Three moves to the expectation that abortion bans will be competently enforced. Here, I examine the legitimacy struggles arising from law enforcement patterns, along with the administrative challenges inherent in overseeing the various exceptions to abortion bans.
This article concludes with a consideration of why the consequences and limitations of abortion bans should matter to supporters and opponents, alike.
Abortion opponents anticipate that banning abortion will deter it. That said, they are not overly sanguine about this hope; anti-abortion advocates acknowledge that abortions will continue to take place, even if illegal. 7 But their support for abortion bans rests firmly on the expectation that there will be fewer of them, once abortion is a crime. 8 In this section, I explore the question of deterrence, first considering the population-wide impact of bans on abortion rates, and then describing the Americans most likely to be deterred by abortion bans.
I.A. Deterrence, in the Aggregate
To think about whether abortion can be deterred by outlawing it, we must begin by reflecting on what leads people to have abortions. Abortion demand is driven by a host of factors—health status, relationship status, job status—but the most commonly cited concern is lack of money. 9 Half of all US abortions go to the 13 per cent of Americans living below the poverty line–which in 2022, means living on less than $13,590. 10 Those living in poverty or near poverty make up a full 76 per cent of abortions every year. 11 These are people whose abortion decisions are motivated, at least in part, because they cannot afford the costs of child rearing. 12
Rather than focusing on reducing abortion demand by offsetting the costs of having children, abortion bans aim to deter abortion solely by reducing access to legal abortion. Even a cursory glance at worldwide abortion rates suggests that strategy might not work. Abortion rates vary dramatically by region. In Latin America, (home to countries with the world’s strictest abortion bans), we find some of the highest abortion rates in the world: 32 abortions for every 1000 women. 13 At the other end of the spectrum, Western Europe, (with relatively liberal abortion laws), has the world’s lowest abortion rates: only 12 abortions per 1000 women. 14
The variation in abortion rates is best understood as an artifact of variation in rates of unintended pregnancy. 15 The single biggest predictor of abortion rates is not the legal status of abortion, but rather, the percentage of pregnancies that occur among those who were not looking to have a baby. In 2014, the most recent year for which data is available, 44 per cent of pregnancies globally were unintended. 53 per cent of those unintended pregnancies ended in abortion. 16 Rates of both unintended pregnancy and abortion vary by a country’s wealth status. In the world’s wealthier nations, over the past quarter century, rates of unintended pregnancies dropped by 30 per cent, triggering a decline in abortion rates from 46 abortions per 1000 women of reproductive age to an average of 27. 17 By contrast, over the same time frame in the developing world, unintended pregnancy rates fell by only 16 per cent, while abortion rates remained static. 18
Like other wealthy countries, U.S. abortion rates have dropped significantly in recent decades. 19 The decline is evident across almost every demographic in the country—younger, older, Northern, Southern. With one exception: abortion rates have remained constant among the poorest Americans. 20 This finding underscores the significance of unintended pregnancy in driving abortion rates: nearly half of all pregnancies in the United States are unintended—a higher rate than in many other developed countries. 21 These rates vary dramatically by class: a poor woman in the USA is more than five times as likely as an affluent woman to have an unintended pregnancy. 22
The single most effective way to help people avoid unwanted pregnancies, thereby deterring abortion, is by increasing contraception rates. When the Affordable Care Act mandated insurance coverage for contraception, the unintended pregnancy rate dropped from 44.7 to 37.9 per cent. 23 And yet, the anti-abortion movement has opted to oppose efforts to increase access to contraception. 24 Indeed, abortion opponents vigorously fought the Affordable Care Act’s birth control mandate, which the Supreme Court ultimately struck down in 2014. 25
If the goal of banning abortions is to deter them, a strategy that fails to focus on reducing unintended pregnancy seems limited, at best. But even if one accepts that abortion opponents are too ambivalent about promoting contraception to center the goal of deterring abortion by reducing unwanted pregnancy, the plan to deter abortion by banning it is flawed for a second reason. Specifically, owing to the ready availability of abortion medicines, abortion bans cannot effectively restrict access to a safe, effective, and affordable means to end a pregnancy.
The widespread availability of abortion medicines has completely transformed the world of illegal abortion. Unlike the pre-Roe era, medication abortion solves the problem of finding a doctor to perform an illegal abortion, while simultaneously reducing the health risks. 26 The most common and widely available abortion medicine is misoprostol. 27 Although less effective than the FDA-approved combination of mifepristone and misoprostol typically used in medical abortions in the USA, misoprostol alone causes an abortion in approximately 90 per cent of cases. 28 Efforts to restrict access to misoprostol are complicated for two reasons. It is both cheap and easy to manufacture, costing only pennies to make, and it also is an important life-saving medicine. 29 Indeed, the World Health Organization lists misoprostol as an ‘essential medicine,’ owing in part to its vital role in reducing deaths from postpartum hemorrhages, miscarriages, and illegal abortions. 30
There is a robust international market in misoprostol across the world today—particularly in countries where abortion is strictly banned. 31 Even in Central America, which boasts the world’s strictest abortion bans, one in three pregnancies ends in abortion, largely induced by medicines purchased online or on the street. 32 Americans familiar with the black market in opioids should have little trouble imagining how a market in abortion medicines will proliferate, where abortion is banned. As is all too evident from the scope of the opiate problem, it is unrealistic to think the government can prosecute away the expanding market in abortion medicines. 33
Outlawing abortion may lead to a short-term decline in US abortion rates, while people adjust to new market conditions. 34 But as we learn from the experiences of countries throughout the world, this decline is unlikely to be sustained. If anything, given the availability of reliable online information and buying options, it should take far less time for people to adapt to accessing illegal abortion than was true for alcohol access after Prohibition. 35
I.B. Deterrence, in the Specific
Even if abortion bans are unlikely to cause an aggregate decline in abortion rates–at least not independently of other trends 36 –we can predict that they will cause some to carry to term pregnancies they might otherwise have aborted. 37 In fact, we have a surprisingly clear picture of those who the bans are most likely to deter: they will be disproportionately young, poor, Black, and brown women. Abortion bans come as one in a long list of factors that circumscribe the reproductive lives and life options of these Americans. 38 They are more likely to experience unintended pregnancy, and where abortion is outlawed, they are more likely to struggle with accessing abortion, whether by traveling to a legal jurisdiction, or by identifying reliable information about how to safely end an unwanted pregnancy with abortion medications. 39
Those who support abortion bans on deterrence grounds have yet to fully grapple with what happens to those for whom abortion, legal or otherwise, is out of reach. The standard response is to promote the solution of placing newborn babies for adoption. Justice Amy Coney Barrett nodded to this viewpoint at oral argument in the Dobbs case, correcting the assertion that abortion bans amount to ‘forced motherhood’ by noting that safe haven laws permit them to surrender their newborns without legal consequences. 40 Adoption proponents point to the ways in which open adoptions have become the norm, hopeful that the prospect of staying involved in their baby’s life will encourage more people to place them for adoption. 41 Banning abortion, as they see it, can be a ‘win-win-win’ situation, in which the baby survives, the mother gets to go on with her life, and a married couple or family gets to raise the child. 42
Yet all available evidence suggests that banning abortion is unlikely to transform adoption from an outlier into a commonplace response to unwanted pregnancy. Even in the years prior to Roe, when the stigma of unwed motherhood led some facing pregnancy to place their babies, only 9 per cent of women chose adoption. 43 Much of that rate was driven by white women, because the two-parent family norm was less entrenched among Black and brown Americans. Today, the stigma is gone: 40 per cent of all children are born out of wedlock. 44 When faced with an unintended pregnancy, fewer than 5 per cent of people seriously consider adoption, and of those, fewer than 2 per cent ultimately place their children with adoptive families. 45
The best indication of what is likely to happen to those unable to access abortion is found in the Turnaway study, a 10-year longitudinal investigation of the impact of being denied an abortion. 46 That study followed hundreds of women who sought abortions, but were turned away because they were beyond the clinic’s gestational limits. 47 Fully 91 per cent of them opted to raise their child. 48
The Turnaway study also tells us about the consequent intensification of poverty for these families:
[C]hildren of women who are denied an abortion had greater odds (72 vs 55%) of living in poverty compared to children of women who received a wanted abortion. Similarly, existing children were more likely (87 vs 70%) to live in a household in which their mother is not able to afford necessary living expenses such as food, housing, and transportation compared to children of women who received a wanted abortion. 49
As we look to understand what happens when an abortion ban ‘works’ by deterring abortion, the only question is how broad a lens to use. More than one in three single-mother families lived in poverty in 2016. 50 Poverty is not color-blind. Instead, far more women of color live in poverty than do their white counterparts: close to 25 per cent of all American Indian or Alaskan native and 20 per cent of all Black and Hispanic women live in poverty, compared to only 9 per cent of their white counterparts. 51
So severe are the downstream consequences for children born into poverty that the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a statement decrying the short and long-term consequences of the ‘medicalization of poverty’:
Children who experience poverty, particularly during early life or for an extended period, are at risk of a host of adverse health and developmental outcomes through their life course. Poverty has a profound effect on specific circumstances, such as birth weight, infant mortality, language development, chronic illness, environmental exposure, nutrition, and injury. Child poverty also influences genomic function and brain development…. Children living in poverty are at increased risk of difficulties with self-regulation and executive function, such as inattention, impulsivity, defiance, and poor peer relationships. Poverty can make parenting difficult, especially in the context of concerns about inadequate food, energy, transportation, and housing. Child poverty is associated with lifelong hardship. Poor developmental and psychosocial outcomes are accompanied by a significant financial burden, not just for the children and families who experience them but also for the rest of society…. 52
We should read these statistics as a forecast. To the extent abortion bans deter abortion, we will likely see a disproportionate increase in the number of poor families of color experiencing the devastating consequences of living in poverty. Abortion bans work by leveraging existing inequalities. 53
Abortion opponents are of two minds about how to respond to the poor predicted outcomes for those who opt to raise children after being unable to access abortion. Small numbers of advocates–largely drawn from the volunteer ranks of pregnancy support or ‘crisis pregnancy’ centers–advocate helping women who are in desperate straits by offering housing, counseling, job training, and other support. 54 But the dominant voice of the anti-abortion movement–those advocates engaged in political activism and law reform, rather than direct service–focuses not on supporting poor mothers, but instead, on promoting adoption. 55
The suggestion that adoption is the optimal solution to a poorly timed pregnancy is as convenient as it is naïve. It allows abortion opponents to avoid a reckoning with consequences of having made the Republican party their political home. 56 The GOP’s historical and ongoing objection to family-friendly government policies 57 will make it hard, in the years to come, for abortion opponents to gain much traction for laws aimed at blunting the crushing impact of poverty on those whom the bans deter from having abortions.
Those who support abortion bans do not rest their support solely on the expectation that such laws will deter abortion. Instead, abortion opponents often invoke the belief that changing the law will send a message, thereby promoting culture change. 58 This section first considers the nature of that message, and then turns to whether it will be received.
It is helpful, when considering the message sent by outlawing abortion, to note the difference between an anti-abortion message (one that condemns abortion) and a pro-natal message (one that urges people to have babies). This distinction is easiest to observe when contrasting U.S. laws with those of countries that actively encourage childbearing.
Consider the case of Israel, which makes abortion a crime unless the person can prove to an official ‘pregnancy termination committee’ that they qualify for one of the statute’s exceptions. 59 This law would send a message that, outside of exceptional circumstances, abortion is wrong. 60 But it also exists alongside a host of laws and policies that encourage people to have children. 61 In Israel, there is guaranteed paid maternity leave—you can leave your job for 26 weeks, still get paid, and your employer cannot fire you. 62 Parents enjoy access to local neighborhood, government-subsidized day care. 63 In addition to tax deductions, the Israeli government pays everyone—rich and poor alike—a small monthly allowance for each child under eighteen. 64
In addition to the ways in which these policies help offset some of the most immediate costs associated with having a child, they send a message about how the government feels not just about abortion but also about babies. Israel’s laws send a message that the government wants people to have babies.
By contrast, US laws reflect little interest in encouraging people to have babies, particularly ones they cannot afford to raise. There is no paid parental leave, and no job security at all beyond the first 12 weeks of unpaid leave. 65 There is no child allowance. The Covid-related child income tax break, which reduced child poverty by 30 per cent, was permitted to lapse after a single year. 66 The goal of providing universal access to quality day care and preschool remains a pipedream. 67 The federal assistance program, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, is so under-funded that no state’s subsidy amounts to more than 60 per cent of the federal poverty line, with the result that even in states with relatively generous monthly allocations, families cannot afford modest rent. 68
Those who believe abortion bans promote a culture of life might do well to recognize that any message sent by an abortion ban is necessarily entwined with the messages sent by government laws and policies that set the price of having a child. The message of an abortion ban on its own says little about embracing life, and instead merely suggests that abortion is wrong. 69
As to whether that message will be received, the answer is complicated. For all that, it is common to suggest the law can send messages, there is surprisingly little evidence for how it might do so. Professor Richard McAdams, one of the leading authorities on the ‘expressive function’ of the law, posits that an expressive law reveals the lawmakers’ beliefs, which in turn causes individuals to update their beliefs and ultimately to change their behaviors, usually in the direction of compliance. 70 He points to the example of indoor smoking bans by way of illustration. In the face of mounting evidence on the harmfulness of secondhand smoke, lawmakers enacted indoor smoking bans that served, in part, to send the message that tobacco was dangerous. In turn, these bans helped shift the culture away from smoking. 71
According to McAdams, smoking bans succeeded because lawmakers had a clear, credible message. But government credibility is not automatic; rather, it is earned. To send a message, government actors must offer some reason why the public should trust their conclusions. McAdams suggests the government earned credibility by persuading the public they were acting on data showing that the hazards of secondary smoke inhalation required nothing less. 72
Unlike smoking bans, abortion bans address themselves to a question of morality—one that cannot be settled by aggregated data or special expertise. A government hoping to persuade the public that abortion is immoral will struggle simply because it lacks the expertise needed to settle the question. 73
The challenge of sending a message by banning abortion is intensified by the impact of the ongoing battle over abortion’s legality. When it comes to the law’s ability to send a message, Professor McAdams notes, background noise can be fatal:
Individuals are constantly being bombarded by information from sources other than the law: the print media, Internet, social acquaintances, etc. For expression to change beliefs, there must be some factor that makes the legal signal strong enough to stand out against this background. 74
To send a message, abortion bans must compete for air time with a world of counter-messages. After all, the fight over abortion does not end with abortion bans. Together with the likelihood that abortion remains commonplace, even where banned, and remains legal in almost half the country, the message-sending capacity of abortion bans is more akin to that of marijuana bans than to indoor smoking bans. 75
At the end of the day, perhaps the most that can be said for the message-sending capacity of abortion bans is that, where popularly embraced by an anti-abortion electorate, the bans might contribute to a broader cultural message that abortion is wrong. As Katrina Kimport forcefully demonstrates in her book, No Real Choice , the ‘abortion as killing’ narrative can combine with structural constraints like legal barriers and cost to render abortion ‘unchoosable.’ 76
The final set of expectations harbored by those who support outlawing abortion involves tacit baseline assumptions about how the law will work, in practice. Specifically, supporters assume that abortion bans will be competently implemented and enforced—that the laws will have integrity. Competent implementation and enforcement are not abstract ideals, but rather, are necessary preconditions for a law to be considered a legitimate exercise of state authority. The failure to competently implement an abortion ban will undercut its legitimacy, thereby undermining both the law’s capacity to deter abortion and also its ability to send a message.
To understand the practical considerations relevant to enforcing abortion bans, begin by noting what is required in order to implement them. The standard form of US abortion bans includes a general prohibition, accompanied by a small number of exceptions. 77 This structure gives rise to two implementation and enforcement questions, both of which will determine whether the laws are ultimately seen as legitimate exercises of government authority. When and how will prosecutors endeavor to enforce the bans, and by what mechanisms will states evaluate cases involving exceptions to the bans?
Let us examine each of these in turn.
III.A. Enforcing Abortion Bans
Supporters of abortion bans have given relatively little thought to the question of how abortion laws will be enforced. In late 2021, movement leader Marjorie Dannenfelser, President of the Susan B. Anthony List (a nonprofit that supports pro-life politicians) explained how she views the question of enforcement:
[M]y view, and the view of the entire movement—without any exception that I’m aware of—is that the doctor, the one who has been planning to break the law, is the guilty party. The law is enforced against that person, not the woman. 78
But illegal abortion today need not involve a doctor or any third party besides an overseas pharmacy, outside the easy reach of US laws. 79 Given abortion medicines, the reality is that there are no doctors to prosecute.
When abortion becomes a crime, the question of who is the criminal will require an answer. And rather than being answered by movement leaders, the decision will rest in the hands of locally-elected prosecutors. No county can afford to prosecute every crime–far from it–so local District Attorneys set priorities when enforcing the law. 80 Their choices may be informed by many factors: staff resources, strength of evidence, heinousness of crime, perception of public will, or say, pro-choice or anti-abortion sentiment. As Judge Stephanos Bibas notes, there is no check on ‘idiosyncratic prosecutorial discretion.’ 81
A quick review of abortion prosecutions both historically and today helps us understand what idiosyncratic abortion prosecutions might look like. Historian Leslie Regan’s work documents the episodic nature of abortion prosecutions in the years prior to Roe , showing how they tended to be sporadic—an occasional crackdown, motivated by a zealous prosecutor, rather than a comprehensive effort at enforcement. 82
A similar pattern is seen today in places where abortion is outlawed. For example, consider El Salvador, which bans abortion without exception. In the 10 years from 2000–2010, there were 129 prosecutions. 83 This number suggests enforcement is relatively rare—just over 10 prosecutions per year—when, by the government’s own estimates, the country sees tens of thousands of abortions every year. 84 But there is a pattern to the prosecutions. Those charged with abortion crimes are drawn from the most vulnerable, marginalized sectors of society. 85 Almost half were illiterate; only a quarter had attended high school. 86
In the U.S. we already see a version of this pattern: abortion-related prosecutions are brought by zealous prosecutors 87 , and they disproportionately target Black and brown women. 88 The work of National Advocates for Pregnant Women helps us to understand the scope of abortion-related prosecutions in the years since Roe legalized abortion. They have tracked 1600 USA such cases since 1973. 89 These cases involve a range of allegations, linked by the common thread of alleged harm to a pregnancy. 90 The prosecutions overwhelmingly target poor people, and in particular, poor Black pregnant women. Of 413 cases arising from 1973 to 2005, 71 per cent involved low income women, of whom 59 per cent were women of color, with 52 per cent identifying as Black. 91
These patterns in abortion-related prosecutions tell us two important things. First, we can expect abortion bans to be enforced against those who end their own pregnancies. 92 And second, abortion prosecutions are likely to target the most marginalized, vulnerable members of society—those whom prosecutors view, or at least believe others will be willing to view, not as victims but rather, as villains. 93
Supporters of abortion should stop insisting that bans won’t be enforced against women, and should start figuring out what to do about the fact that, when abortion bans are enforced, the defendants will likely be Black and brown. It is, of course, unfair to make one subset of the population pay the price for acts that go unpunished when committed by others. Furthermore, as we learn from racial disparities in drug law enforcement, such patterns undermine the legitimacy of the law, and have downstream corrosive effects both on the people disproportionately targeted by the law and on society as a whole. 94
III.B. The Return of Conditional Abortion Access
Setting aside the question of prosecution, abortion laws also must be fully implemented in the regulatory sense of the word. A law that limits abortion access to patients with qualifying conditions presupposes an adjudicatory mechanism for determining eligibility. And barring a dramatic evisceration of the right to life for those who are pregnant, every state will have to make at least one exception to their abortion bans, for life-threatening pregnancies. 95
How will a patient establish their right to an abortion when they are experiencing a life-threatening pregnancy?
There are a variety of models by which states might screen such claims, ranging from relatively formal proceedings, such as those seen in cases involving termination of government benefits, to loosely structured processes like school disciplinary hearings. 96 Indeed, we already have a model for abortion-related adjudications in the judicial bypass system, by which minors can seek permission to end a pregnancy without parental involvement. 97
Each model is fraught, when it comes to screening for abortion eligibility. Formal judicial hearings pose challenges in terms of accuracy (there is surprisingly little agreement on what constitutes a life-threatening pregnancy) 98 and efficiency (given the urgent, technical nature of the inquiry). 99 A judge could not conceivably rule on such petitions without expert testimony, which raises numerous questions about process and evidence.
Prior to Roe , rather than ask judges to decide these cases, states delegated the determination to doctors, essentially leaving the medical profession to devise its own ways of complying with the law. 100 For reasons ranging from lack of consensus about qualifying conditions, 101 to concern over the legal implications of their decisions (which might trigger prosecution on the one hand, or a wrongful death suit if the pregnant patient dies, on the other), 102 doctors eschewed this responsibility. By the mid-20th century, hospitals around the country used so-called ‘therapeutic abortion committees’ to establish eligibility. 103 These committees were marked by inconsistent outcomes, stemming from a lack of consensus over what constituted a ‘valid’ reason for terminating a pregnancy, whether legally or morally. 104 Rather than standardizing the application of the law, the committee process facilitated ad hoc decision-making. 105
As states set about banning abortion, it is urgent that they erect a scientifically sound, impartial process by which to evaluate cases involving potentially life-saving abortions. Given that the vast majority of Americans support abortion in cases of life-threatening pregnancy, we can expect an enormous outcry from all quarters in the case of an incompetent oversight process, let alone a highly publicized death. 106
Yet the struggle to define what constitutes a life-threatening pregnancy, (or depending upon the law, a qualifying rape or fetal anomaly), is just the start. Which parties’ interests will be represented at these adjudicatory proceedings; however, they are configured? Will the pregnant patient be entitled to a lawyer? 107 Will the fetus? If unhappy with the outcome, can either side appeal? Will there be an expedited appeals process? By what criteria will adjudicators be chosen? Will these be adversarial proceedings, with experts from the state and from the pregnant patient’s medical team, or will the patient’s doctor’s testimony suffice? How will the government determine whose interests it represents: those of the patient in peril, or those of the fetus?
These are serious questions, made all the more so because they implicate vital interests and therefore trigger Constitutional due process rights. 108 Surely, there will be litigation over the answers in the years to come. But what is interesting about these questions is not so much their answers, but instead, the reality that they demand answers now. We are past the time when those who support banning abortion can respond to such questions about how the laws will be implemented with vague references to ‘traditional means of enforcement.’ 109 And the quality of those answers matters because inconsistent, incompetent or otherwise corrupt law enforcement cannot help but undermine the legitimacy of abortion bans.
We have spent half a century reckoning with abortion largely in abstractions, fighting over rights rather than focusing on the people whose lives are affected by those rights. If nothing else, the impact of abortion bans seems likely to put human faces on the abortion war. And if we stay true to the patterns laid out in this essay, those faces will be disproportionately poor, Black and brown women and children.
Abortion bans are not color blind.
It has become common for abortion opponents to invoke allegations of eugenics and racism when talking about abortion rates among Black Americans. 110 That rhetoric–already contested 111 –will become strained as the country witnesses the actual racist impact of abortion bans: their disparate impact on poor Black families, coupled with the disparate rates of prosecution of Black women for acts that go largely unpunished when committed by whites. 112
By bringing into focus the struggles facing the most vulnerable among us, abortion bans have the potential to transform the abortion war by forcing a direct engagement with the structural forces driving abortion, poverty, and racism. We are approaching a moment of truth for advocates on all sides of the abortion war.
For advocates of abortion rights, there will be a reckoning with the question of whether being pro-choice simply means supporting the right to abortion, rather than a commitment to working to offset the forces that constrain all reproductive options–including having a child. As Sister Song, a leading voice of the reproductive justice movement puts it, the commitment is to support, ‘the human right to maintain personal bodily autonomy, have children, not have children, and parent the children we have in safe and sustainable communities.’ 113 As the impact of abortion bans brings structural inequality into sharp focus, will pro-choice movement leaders stay focused on legalizing abortion, or will the movement commit to this more robust understanding of reproductive autonomy?
For abortion opponents, the question is whether the term ‘pro-life’ has come to mean anything beyond one’s support for abortion bans. The years ahead likely will pose an existential challenge for people who have supported abortion bans, but who cannot help but be disturbed by the ways in which they fall short of expectations. Perhaps this result will embolden those who care deeply about deterring abortion, and find them laboring to craft policies that might actually help those contemplating abortion to continue their pregnancies. 114
Certainly, anti-abortion movement leaders are aware of the need to do something proactive in response to the impact of abortion bans on the poor. As Marjorie Dannenfelser, of the Susan B. Anthony Fund, put it: ‘Speaking for the pro-life movement, which is obviously attempting to lead Republicans, we absolutely, without question, have a responsibility to serve the needs of women and children as we pass ambitious laws. There’s no question about it.’ At the same time, Dannenfelser is aware that such policies are unlikely to fly, at least not in states dominated by a Republican party that has long opposed family-friendly government programs. 115
There’s a quote I keep on my desk these days: “How will we go when we’re faced with this? I don’t think it’s predetermined, and a great human moral drama is being played out in front of us.” 116 It is from a historian of pandemics, written in the early days of Covid-19. I keep it there because it speaks to me as we navigate the era of abortion bans. There is comfort in the invitation to step back and notice that we are in a time of high moral drama, in which things are in flux. But there is also, within it, a call to action. “How will we go when we’re faced with this?”
For helpful suggestions and conversation, I’m grateful to Diana Greene Foster, Julia Hejduk, Carole Joffe, Katrina Kimport, Larry Marshall, and my anonymous reviewers. I was particularly lucky to work with Jenai Howard (SCU Law, 2022), who provided outstanding research assistance. All errors are my own.
Human Subjects Research for this article was approved by Santa Clara University’s IRB, Protocol 17-03-950.
Research was funded in part by a Hackworth Grant (Santa Clara University, Markkula Ethics Center).
See Mary Ziegler, After Roe: The Lost History Of The Abortion Debate (2015), for a rich history of the anti-abortion movement in the early years after Roe v. Wade, illustrating among other things the way the anti-abortion movement shifted its focus from efforts to support pregnant women to the narrow issue of criminalization.
See generally Michelle Oberman, How Abortion Laws Do and Don’t Work , 36 Wis. J. L. Gender & Soc’y 163 (2022); see also Michelle Oberman, Her Body, Our Laws: On The Front Lines Of The Abortion War, From El Salvador To Oklahoma (2018); Diana Greene Foster, The Turnaway Study: Ten Years, A Thousand Women, And The Consequences Of Having Or Being Denied An Abortion (2020) [hereinafter, greene foster, the turnaway study]; Ushma Upadhyay, Alice F. Cartwright, and Daniel Grossman, Barriers to Abortion Care and Incidence of Attempted Self-Managed Abortion Among Individuals Searching Google for Abortion Care: A National Prospective Study , 106 Contraception 49 (2021); Lizzie Widdecombe, What Does an At-Home Abortion Look Like in 2021 , The New Yorker (Nov. 11, 2021), https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-does-an-at-home-abortion-look-like-in-2021 (profiling self-managed abortion researcher, Abigail Aiken).
For example, see Ross Douthat, The Case Against Abortion , N.Y. Times (Nov. 30, 2021), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/30/opinion/abortion-dobbs-supreme-court.html (celebrating the impact of Texas’ S.B. 8, credited with causing a 93 per cent drop in the number of abortions taking place in the state).
See eg Richard Garnett, One Untrue Thing , Nat’l Rev. (Aug. 1, 2007), ( https://www.nationalreview.com/2007/08/one-untrue-thing-nro-symposium/ (‘The point of criminalization, after all, is not merely to put people in prison, or deter people from engaging in harmful behavior. It is, instead, to make a statement—a public statement, in the community’s voice—that certain actions, or certain harms caused, are morally blameworthy.’). See also Oberman, supra note 2, at 85–86 (quoting an anonymous Oklahoma state senator):
The purpose of the law is to stop abortion. To send a moral message. To get the message out via the law, to spark a debate in the population. The government’s responsibility is to give people education. It is up to the government to tell them that abortion is wrong. It’s not an acceptable solution.
This assumption is largely a tacit one, inherent in assertions about how abortion bans will be received by the public, and how they are likely to inspire others states to follow suit. See eg Issac Chotiner, The Pro-Life Movement Plans for a Future Without Roe , The New Yorker (Dec. 7, 2021), https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/the-pro-life-movement-plans-for-a-future-without-roe (interviewing Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, on her expectations for passing abortion bans in 30 states).
See Diane Greene Foster, Stop Saying That Making Abortion Illegal Won’t Stop People From Having Them , Rewire News Group (Oct. 4, 2018) [hereinafter Green Foster, Stop Saying ], https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2018/10/04/stop-saying-that-making-abortion-illegal-doesnt-stop-them/ ; see generally Greene Foster, The Turnaway Study, supra note 2.
See eg Stephanie Ranade Krider, Pro-life Advocates Focused on Legal Battles. They’re Not Enough to End Abortion , Wash. Post (Oct. 15, 2021), https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/pro-life-after-roe/2021/10/15/7e2a059e-2cf8-11ec-985d-3150f7e106b2_story.html (Krider, an abortion opponent, acknowledges that while ‘the end of Roe would be a victory and a cause for celebration for those…who oppose abortion, [it] would not end the practice nationwide.’).
See Douthat, supra note 3.
See Biggs, M. Antonia, Heather Gould & Diana Greene Foster, Understanding why Women Seek Abortions in the US , 13 BMC Women’s Health 1–13 (2013); see also Sophia Chae et al., Reasons Why Women Have Induced Abortions: A Synthesis of Findings From 14 Countries , 96 Contraception 233–41 (2017). (Analyzing data from 14 countries to identify the primary reasons given for seeking abortion, and finding that, although people often listed several reasons, the dominant reason involved socioeconomic concerns).
See Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guideline, 87 Fed. Reg. 3315, 3316 (Jan. 21, 2021).
See Rachel K. Jones & Jenna Jerman, Population Group Abortion Rates and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion: United States, 2008–2014, 107 Am. J. Publ. Health 1904–909 (2017), https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304042 ; see also Abortion Rates by Income Level , Infographic , Guttmacher Inst. (Oct. 19, 2017), https://www.guttmacher.org/infographic/2017/abortion-rates-income .
More accurately, because almost 60% of those having an abortion already have at least one child, they cannot afford the costs of another child. Jerman J, Jones RK & Onda T, Characteristics of U.S. Abortion Patients in 2014 and Changes Since 2008 , Guttmacher Inst. (2016), https://www.guttmacher.org/report/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2014 .
Bearak J et al., Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019 , 8 lancet global health 9 (2020).
An unintended pregnancy is one that occurred when a woman wanted to become pregnant in the future but not at the time she became pregnant (‘wanted later’) or one that occurred when she did not want to become pregnant then or at any time in the future (‘unwanted’). See Unintended Pregnancy in the United States , Guttmacher Inst. (Jan. 2017), https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/unintended-pregnancy-united-states . In recent years, this frame has been problematized by calling into view the reality that, for many people, pregnancies are not so much planned as they are responded to. That is to say, the relevant question is not whether it was intended, but whether it is wanted or unwanted. See Abigail R.A. Aiken, et al., Rethinking the Pregnancy Planning Paradigm: Unintended Conceptions or Unrepresentative Concepts? , 48 Perspect Sex Reprod Health 147–151 (2016).
See generally Unintended Pregnancy Rates Declined Globally from 1990 to 2014 , Guttmacher Inst. (Mar. 5, 2018), https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2018/unintended-pregnancy-rates-declined-globally-1990-2014 .
Between the 1990s and 2020, abortion rates declined by almost 40%. See Sabrina Tavernise, Why Women Getting Abortions Now Are More Likely to Be Poor , N.Y Times (July 9, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/abortion-access-inequality.html . In the years since 2010 alone, rates have declined by almost 20%. Elizabeth Nash & Joerg Dreweke, The U.S. Abortion Rate Continues to Drop: Once Again, State Abortion Restrictions Are Not the Main Driver , Guttmacher Inst. (Sept. 18, 2019), https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2019/09/us-abortion-rate-continues-drop-once-again-state-abortion-restrictions-are-not-main . Scholars are divided in their explanations for the decline, which vary from increasingly effective contraceptive practices to declines in rates of sexual activity. See Pam Belluck, America’s Abortion Rate Has Dropped to its Lowest Ever , N.Y. Times (Sept. 20, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/18/health/abortion-rate-dropped.html ; see also Diana Greene Foster, Dramatic Decreases in US Abortion Rates: Public Health Achievement or Failure? , 107 Am J. Public Health 1860 (2017); Alia E. Dastagir, Fewer Women are having abortions. Why? , USA Today (June 13, 2019), https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/06/13/abortion-law-fewer-women-having-abortions-why/1424236001/ ; Doug Stanglin, US Abortion Rate is at its Lowest, but Restrictive Laws aren’t the Likely Cause, Study Says , USA Today (Sept. 18, 2019), https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/09/18/number-of-abortions-us-drops-guttmacher-institute-study/2362316001/ .
See U.S. Abortion Rate Continues to Decline, Hits Historic Low, Guttmacher Inst. (Jan. 17, 2017), https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2017/us-abortion-rate-continues-decline-hits-historic-low .
See Guttmacher Inst., supra note 15. Although poor Americans have higher rates of unintended pregnancy for a range of reasons, central among them is that they struggle to access contraception. See Michele Troutman, Saima Rafique & Torie Comeaux Plowden, Are Higher Unintended Pregnancy Rates Among Minorities a Result of Disparate Access to Contraception? , Contracept Reprod Med 5, no. 16 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-020-00118-5 (describing the factors underlying the disparate rates of unintended pregnancy by race and class). One finds evidence of this struggle in the data on contraceptive use among sexually active women not seeking pregnancy. While 90% of those covered by private health insurance and 87% of those covered by Medicaid use contraception, that figure drops to 81% for those who have no insurance coverage. Megan L. Kavanaugh & Emma Pliskin, Use of Contraception Among Reproductive-aged Women in the United States , 2014 and 2016 , Guttmacher Inst. (July, 2020). On the cost of contraception, see Eliana Kosova, How Much Do Different Kinds of Birth Control Cost Without Insurance? , Nat’l Women’s Health Network (Nov. 17, 2017), https://nwhn.org/much-different-kinds-birth-control-cost-without-insurance/ (noting that the most effective methods, long-acting implants and devices, cost upwards of $800, and that oral contraceptives can cost up to $600 per year).
Cost is not the only barrier to contraception, ranging from cost to personal preferences. For example, Black women tend to report higher rates of dissatisfaction with existing contraceptive options, putting them at further disadvantage in terms of risk of unwanted pregnancy. Andrea V. Jackson, Deborah Karasek, Christine Dehlendorf, and Diana Greene Foster, Racial and Ethnic Differences in Women’s Preferences for Features of Contraceptive Methods , 93 Contraception 406–411 (2016).
See Colleen L. MacCallum-Bridges & Claire Margerison, The Affordable Care Act Contraception Mandate & Unintended Pregnancy in Women of Reproductive Age: An Analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2008–2010 v. 2013–2015 , 101 Contraception 34–39 (2020) (Overall, the odds of experiencing unintended pregnancy decreased 15% from the pre-mandate to post-mandate period); See also Susan Christiansen, The Impact of the Affordable Care Act Contraceptive Mandate on Fertility and Abortion Rates (Dec. 2020) (Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University), https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/63939 (last visited Jan. 28, 2022).
See Molly Jong-Fast, The Anti-Birth Control Movement Is the New Anti-Abortion Movement , Vogue (July 1, 2021), https://www.vogue.com/article/anti-birth-control-movement .
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014) (striking down the ACA’s contraception mandate because it ‘created a substantial burden’ on Hobby Lobby’s religious freedom and it was not the ‘least restrictive means of satisfying the government’s interests.’) . See eg Tom Cohen, Hobby Lobby Ruling Much More Than Abortion , Cnn Politics (July 2, 2014), https://www.cnn.com/2014/07/02/politics/scotus-hobby-lobby-impacts/index.html (describing anti-abortion advocates opposition to contraception mandates).
See Carole Joffe, Failing to Embed Abortion Care in Mainstream Medicine Made it Politically Vulnerable , Wash. Post (Jan. 11, 2022), https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/01/11/failing-embed-abortion-care-mainstream-medicine-made-it-politically-vulnerable/ (describing the range in quality of abortion providers when abortion was illegal).
See Elizabeth G. Raymond et al., Efficacy of Misoprostol Alone for First-Trimester Medical Abortion: A Systematic Review , 133 Obstet Gynecol 133–147 (2019).
Id. (This consolidated report of existing research finds that misoprostol alone successfully terminates a pregnancy in 93% of cases).
See How to Buy Abortion Pills That Are Safe and Effective , https://www.ipas.org/our-work/abortion-self-care/abortion-with-pills/how-to-buy-abortion-pills-that-are-safe-and-effective/ (Noting that manufacturers sell the pills to pharmacies for very little cost—less than $0.05 per pill—and that the highest sales price found in a recent study was $2 per pill).
See eg Celina Schocken, Business Case: Investing in Production of High Quality Misoprostol for Low-Resource Settings , Concept. Found. (Dec. 2014), https://www.conceptfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/BusinessCase_Misoprostol_web.pdf (describing misoprostol’s vital role in treating postpartum hemorrhage); see also Essential Medicines List includes Misoprostol tablets for use during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum care , World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/data/gho/indicator-metadata-registry/imr-details/essential-medicines-list-includes-misoprostol-tablets-for-use-during-pregnancy-childbirth-and-postpartum-care .
Beverly Winikoff & Wendy Sheldon, Use of Medicines Changing the Face of Abortion , Guttmacher Inst. (Sept. 2012), https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/ipsrh/2012/09/use-medicines-changing-face-abortion . For a description of the misoprostol market in countries where abortion is illegal, see Michelle Oberman, What Happens When Abortion is Banned? , N.Y. Times (May 31, 2018), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/31/opinion/sunday/abortion-banned-latin-america.html .
See Gilda Sedgh et al., Induced Abortion: Incidence and Trends Worldwide from 1995 to 2008 , 379 The Lancet 625, 625 (2012) (comparing the one out of three pregnancies in Central America end in abortion with one out of five in the United States); see also Susheela Singh et al., Abortion Worldwide: A Decade of Uneven Progress , Guttmacher Inst. (Oct. 2009), http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/Abortion-Worldwide.pdf .
There is evidence of an expanding market in misoprostol in the U.S. See Caroline Kitchener, Self-Managed Abortion Could be the Future—But it’s Very Hard to Talk About , The Lily (Dec. 20, 2021), https://www.thelily.com/self-managed-abortion-could-be-the-future-but-its-very-hard-to-talk-about/ . See also, Erica Hellerstein, The Rise of the DIY Abortion in Texas , The Atlantic (June 27, 2014), https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/06/the-rise-of-the-diy-abortion-in-texas/373240/ .
Kari White et al., Initial Impacts of Texas’ Senate Bill 8 on Abortions in Texas and at Out-of State Facilities , Texas Policy Evaluation Project (Oct. 2021), http://sites.utexas.edu/txpep/files/2021/11/TxPEP-brief-SB8-inital-impact.pdf .
In the immediate aftermath of Prohibition–evidenced by mortality rates, mental health, and crime statistics–alcohol consumption fell to approximately 30% of its pre-Prohibition level. But this drop in alcohol consumption was short-lived. Within a few years after Prohibition, alcohol consumption had increased to 60–70% of its pre-Prohibition level. See Annika Nekalson, Prohibition was a Failed Experiment in Moral Governance, The Atlantic (Jan. 16, 2020), https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/01/prohibition-was-failed-experiment-moral-governance/604972/ .
See Nash & Dreweke, supra note 19, regarding the various reasons behind declining abortion rates.
See Greene Foster, Stop Saying , supra note 6; see also Greene Foster, The Turnaway Study, supra note 2.
Hence the insistence of the reproductive justice movement that advocates center the goals of racial justice. RJ Squared. For a detailed description of the ways in which structural inequities circumscribe the reproductive choices of poor women and women of color, see Jamila K. Taylor, Structural Racism and Maternal Health Among Black Women , 48 Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics 506–517 (2020).
See generally, Katrina Kimport, No Real Choice: How Culture And Politics Matter For Reproductive Autonomy (2021) (positing that for the most marginalized Americans faced with an unwanted pregnancy, the question is not whether to have an abortion or have a baby, but rather, whether they can actually get an abortion or not).
At oral argument, Justice Barrett said, “Both Roe and Casey emphasized the burdens of parenting, and insofar as you and many of your amici focus on the ways in which the forced parenting, forced motherhood would hinder women’s access to the workplace and to equal opportunities, it’s also focused on the consequences of parenting and the obligations of motherhood that flow from pregnancy. Why don’t the safe haven laws take care of that problem?” Transcript of Oral Argument at 56, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, No. 19–1392. For a compelling analysis and indictment of safe haven laws, see Laury Oaks, Giving Up Baby: Safe Haven Laws, Motherhood, And Reproductive Justice (2015); see also Lizzie Widdicombe, The Baby-Box Lady of America , The New Yorker (Dec. 18, 2021) https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-baby-box-lady-of-america .
See Mardie Caldwell, Open Adoption is a Win-Win Situation (Apr. 7, 2018), https://mardiecaldwell.com/open-adoption-is-a-win-win-situation/ ; see also Julia D. Hejduk, Gift Motherhood, the Prius, and the Peace Corps: Reducing Abortion by Incentivizing Adoption , The Public Discourse (Sept. 27, 2017), https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/09/20054/ .
Id . On the merits, what limited scholarly evidence there is on adoption runs counter to this rosy characterization of adoption’s outcomes, at least for birth mothers. See eg Are Birth Mothers Satisfied with Decisions to Place Children for Adoption? , Science Daily (June 8, 2018), https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/06/180608131605.htm (a longitudinal study of birth mothers that found women reported a mean satisfaction of 3.11 on a scale of 1–5). See also Gretchen Sisson, ‘Choosing Life’: Birth Mothers on Abortion and Reproductive Choice , 25 Women’s Health Issues 349–54 (2015) (a study involving in-depth interviews with 40 women who had placed infants for adoption from 1962 to 2009. The majority of the participants–many of whom placed their babies in closed adoptions, which are less typical today–described their adoption experiences as ‘predominantly negative,’ a response that Sisson attributes in part to the reality that adoption is not a preferred course of action, but rather, something chosen by those who feel they have no other options).
Olga Khazan, Why So Many Women Choose Abortion Over Adoption , The Atlantic (May 20, 2019). ( https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/05/why-more-women-dont-choose-adoption/589759 ; S ee also Olga Khazan, The New Question Haunting Adoption , The Atlantic (Oct. 22, 2020), https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/10/adopt-baby-cost-process-hard/620258/ (‘Since the mid-1970s—the end of the so-called baby-scoop era, when large numbers of unmarried women placed their children for adoption—the percentage of never-married women who relinquish their infants has declined from nearly 9% to less than 1%.’).
See Elizabeth Wildsmith, Jennifer Manlove et al., Dramatic Increase in the Proportion of Births Outside of Marriage in the United States from 1990 to 2016 , Child Trends (Aug. 8, 2018), https://www.childtrends.org/publications/dramatic-increase-in-percentage-of-births-outside-marriage-among-whites-hispanics-and-women-with-higher-education-levels#:∼:text=Recent%20estimates%20show%20that%20about , worldwide%20(Chamie%2C%202017). The most rapid growth is among white women: as of 2016, 28% of all births to white women were non-marital. See also Khazan , supra note 43 (Starting in the 1970s, single white women became much less likely to relinquish their babies at birth: nearly a fifth of them did so before 1973; by 1988, just 3% did).
Khazan, Id .
The Turnaway Study is a longitudinal study examining the effects of unintended pregnancy on women’s lives. For the study and its findings, see Greene Foster, The Turnaway Study, supra note 2.
See id . See also Diana Greene Foster, What Happens When It’s Too Late to Get an Abortion , N.Y. Times (Nov. 22, 2021), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/22/opinion/abortion-supreme-court-women-law.html .
See Gretchen Sisson, Lauren Ralph, Heather Gould & Diana Greene Foster, Adoption Decision Making among Women Seeking Abortion, 27 Women’s Health Issues 136 (2017).
See Women’s Access to Abortion Improves Children’s Lives , Ansirh (Jan. 2019), https://www.ansirh.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/womens_access_to_abortion_improves_childrens_lives.pdf .
See generally Kayla Patrick, National Snapshot: Poverty Among Women & Families , National Women’s Law Center, https://nwlc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Poverty-Snapshot-Factsheet-2017.pdf . (The poverty rate for female-headed families with children was 36.5%, compared to 22.1% for male-headed families with children and 7.5% of families headed by married couples with children).
Robin Bleiweis, Diana Boesch & Alexandra C. Gaines, The Basic Facts About Women in Poverty , American Progress (Aug. 3, 2020), https://www.americanprogress.org/article/basic-facts-women-poverty/ .
See American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Community Pediatrics, Poverty and Child Health in the United States , Pediatrics 137 no. 4 (2016): e20160339.
See kimport, supra note 39, at 37, and generally.
See Leah Outten, Birth Mothers and the Adoption Option , Focus On The Family (Nov. 9, 2021), https://www.focusonthefamily.com/pro-life/the-adoption-option-birth-mothers-need-your-support/ ; Stephanie McCrummen, A Maternity Ranch is Born: How Evangelical Women in Texas are Mobilizing for a Future Without Abortion , Wash. Post (Nov. 16, 2021), https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/11/16/evangelical-women-texas-abortion/?utm_campaign=wp_post_most&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_most&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F354c967%2F6193e9909d2fdab56b8e7f16%2F5a1f90909bbc0f4d5203bb72%2F8%2F73%2F6193e9909d2fdab56b8e7f16 . see also Michelle Oberman, The Women the Abortion War Leaves Out , N.Y. Times (Jan. 11, 2018), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/11/opinion/sunday/abortion-crisis-pregnancy-centers.html (describing Oklahoma City’s Rose Home, a pro-life organization that houses up to five pregnant women and their children at any given time).
See Outten, supra note 54. See also Eleanor Bartow, 12 Pro-Life Truths to Counter Every Abortion Myth , The Federalist (Oct. 11, 2021) https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/11/12-pro-life-truths-to-counter-every-abortion-myth/ (where Bartow asserts adoption is ‘a better option than killing an unborn child’ because there are many ‘loving, screened, financially stable parents [who] are waiting to adopt babies.’).
See Sue Halpern, How Republicans Became Anti-Choice , The N.Y. Rev. (Nov. 8, 2018), https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2018/11/08/how-republicans-became-anti-choice/ (reviewing Reversing Roe , a documentary film directed and produced by Ricki Stern and Annie Sundberg).
See Robert Reich, Republicans, So Called party of Family Values, Do Not Support Needy Families , The Guardian (Jul. 18, 2021), https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jul/18/child-allowance-payments-american-rescue-plan-republicans
See eg Richard Garnett, supra note 4. See also Hadley Arkes, in One Untrue Thing , Nat’l Rev. (Aug. 1, 2007), https://www.nationalreview.com/2007/08/one-untrue-thing-nro-symposium/ , (‘[T]he law does not need to invoke the harshest penalties for the sake of teaching moral lessons.’).
§315, Penal Law, 5737–1977, LSI Special Volume (1977), as amended (Isr.),
https://knesset.gov.il/review/data/eng/law/kns8_penallaw_eng.pdf [ https://perma.cc/N9QZ-8JEV ].
Or at least it would do so if the law were interpreted in a way that strictly limited abortion access. Instead, as I explain elsewhere, the committees close to 100% of the requests they receive, making legal abortion readily available in the country. See Oberman, supra note 2, at 172.
And they do. Recall that Israel has the highest fertility rates of any country in the OECD. Families have an average of 3.1 children. See Family Database: Fertility Rates , Org. Econ. Coop. Dev., https://www.oecd.org/els/family/SF_2_1_Fertility_rates.pdf [ https://perma.cc/5J2Y-YGWG ] (last updated June 2021).
See Maternity Leave , Kol Zchut, https://www.kolzchut.org.il/en/Maternity_Leave [ https://perma.cc/Q29Q-T6Q6 ] (last visited June 19, 2021).
See Childcare in Israel , Expat.Com (Sept. 18, 2017) https://www.expat.com/en/guide/middle-east/israel/15420-childcare-in-israel.html [ https://perma.cc/2Z7S-SJCK ] (describing the relative level of state support that young Israeli families receive, compared to the U.S.). See also, Register to State Recognized Daycare and Afternoon Care, and Request State Participation in Tuition Fees , Gov. IL, https://www.gov.il/en/service/registration_for_day_care_centers_and_nurseries1 (last updated Feb. 7, 2020) (Israeli government website describing eligibility for state supported day care). Rates of enrollment in both day care and preschool are among the highest in the developed world. Indeed, preschool enrollment rates are double that of the OECD average. https://issuu.com/bernardvanleerfoundation/docs/publication_taub_center_early_childhood_education_ (at 27).
See, eg Children , Nat’l Ins. Inst. Of Isr., https://www.btl.gov.il/English%20Homepage/Benefits/Children/Pages/default.aspx [ https://perma.cc/8KE2-3K8L ] (last visited on Dec. 19, 2021). Although these policies may not significantly offset the costs of having a child, surely, they are a benefit to Israel’s poorest families.
The only government support for those who have babies lies in family medical leave, which promises twelve weeks of unpaid leave time after the birth of a child. See Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. § 2612.
Ben Casselman, Child Tax Credit’s Extra Help Ends, Just as Covid Surges Anew , N.Y. Times (last updated Jan. 3, 2022), https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/02/business/economy/child-tax-credit.html .
Ali Safawi & Cindy Reyes, States Must Continue Recent Momentum to Further Improve TANF Benefit Levels , Cntr on Budget & Pol’y Priorities (updated Dec. 2, 2021), https://www.cbpp.org/research/family-income-support/states-must-continue-recent-momentum-to-further-improve-tanf-benefit .
For signs that anti-abortion advocates are beginning to grapple with the need to take systemic realities into account, see Tish Harrison Warren, The Systemic Realities Created by Legal Abortion , N.Y. Times (Jan. 22, 2022), https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/22/opinion/roe-legal-abortion.html .
See Richard H. McAdams , A Focal Point Theory of Expressive Law, 86 V.A. L. Rev.1649, 1713–28 (2000) (applying expressive law theory to smoking bans and landlord liability law). See generally Richard H. McAdams, The Expressive Powers Of Law: Theories And Limits (2015).
He offers little evidence, by way of proof. However, numerous studies both domestically and worldwide document an association between smoking bans and an overall decline in smoking rates, including a reduction in smoking by smokers. See eg Thomas W. Carton, Michael Dardon, et al., Comprehensive Indoor Smoking Bans and Smoking Prevalence: Evidence from the BRFSS , 2 J Health Econ. 535–56 (2016); see also Silke Anger, Michael Kvasnicka, Thomas Seidler, One Last Puff? Public Smoking Bans and Smoking Behavior , 30 J Health Econ. 591–601 (2011).
See McAdams, supra note 70, at 197.
These lawmakers also must contend with considerable public opposition to their position. As of 2020, 79% of Americans say that the decision to have an abortion is best left to women, not lawmakers, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation study from 2020. See Ariana Eunjung Cha & Emily Guskin, Most Americans Want Abortion to Remain Legal, but Back S ome State Restrictions , Wash. Post (Jan. 22, 2020), https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/01/22/most-americans-want-abortion-remain-legal-back-some-state-restrictions/ .
See McAdams, supra note 70, at 180.
Recreational cannabis is legal in 18 states, while 11 states criminalize it. (See https://disa.com/map-of-marijuana-legality-by-state for a breakdown of the various jurisdictions’ laws). Experts estimate that at least 15 states will keep abortion legal, and perhaps even expand abortion rights, regardless of the absence of a Constitutional right. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/abortion-policy-absence-roe .
Kimport, supra note 37, at 28 and 62–69.
See eg Anna North, All the Near-Total Abortion Bans Passed This Year Have Now Been Blocked in Court, Vox (updated Oct. 29, 2019), https://www.vox.com/2019/10/2/20895034/alabama-abortion-ban-blocked-georgia-law ; see also Sean Murphy, Oklahoma Supreme Court Blocks 3 New Anti-Abortion Laws, ABC News (Oct. 25, 2021), https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/oklahoma-supreme-court-blocks-anti-abortion-laws-80779946 .
See Chotiner, supra note 5. See also O. Carter Snead, in One Untrue Thing , Nat’l Rev. (Aug. 1, 2007), https://www.nationalreview.com/2007/08/one-untrue-thing-nro-symposium/ (Offering a pragmatic justification for not punishing self-abortion: ‘[T]he public is more willing to accept a law that punishes doctors rather than mothers. Pro-lifers can thus achieve their goal of ending abortion without provoking a political backlash.’).
Although there are legal strategies a government might employ in response to overseas entities that sell abortion medicines to U.S. consumers (eg border patrol agents or diplomatic pressure), we learn from both the heroin and the fentanyl epidemics that the government’s options in the face of high demand are limited. See Claire Felter, Backgrounder: The U.S. Opioid Epidemic , The Council on Foreign Relations, (Sept. 8, 2021), https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-opioid-epidemic .
Stephanos Bibas, Prosecutorial Regulation Versus Prosecutorial Accountability , 157 U. Pa. L. Rev. 959 (2009).
Stephanos Bibas, The Need for Prosecutorial Discretion , 19 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. Rev. 369, 371 (2010).
See Leslie Reagan, When Abortion Was A Crime: Women, Medicine, And Law In The United States, 1867–1973 (1997), at 114, 164.
See From Hospital to Jail: The Impact on Women of El Salvador’s Total Criminalization of Abortion , 22 Repr. Health Matters 52–60 (2014); see also Oberman, supra note 2 , at 8–10 and 49–55 (describing similar patterns in Chile and El Salvador).
See Oberman , supra note 2, at 44.
See Repr. Health Matters, supra note 83.
See eg Chelsea Becker’s prosecution for murder, following stillbirth allegedly caused by methamphetamine use. Judge Dismisses Murder Charge Against Califronia Mother After Stillbirth , N.Y. Times (May 21, 2021), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/20/us/chelsea-becker-stillbirth-murder-charges-california.html .
They may also conscript doctors into law enforcement. See Michelle Oberman, Abortion Bans, Doctors, and the Criminalization of Patients ,48 Hastings Ctr. Rep.5 (2018); see also Oberman, Her Body Our Laws, supra note 2, at 43–67 for a discussion of how reports from doctors to police in El Salvador overwhelmingly involve poor, marginalized women.
Priscilla Thompson & Alexandra Turcios Cruz, How an Oklahoma Women’s Miscarriage Put a Spotlight on Racial Disparities in Prosecutions , Nbc News (Nov. 5, 2021), https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/woman-prosecuted-miscarriage-highlights-racial-disparity-similar-cases-rcna4583 . For a detailed discussion of these cases, see Lynn M. Paltrow & Jeanne Flavin, Arrests of and Forced Interventions on Pregnant Women in the United States, 1973–2005: Implications for Women’s Legal Status and Public Health , 38 J. Health Pol., Pol’y And L. 299, 304–05 (2013) (discussing these findings and the limitations of the research which led the authors to conclude that their findings represent a substantial undercount of cases). See also Michele Goodwin, Policing The Womb: Invisible Women And The Criminalization Of Motherhood (2020).
See Arrests and Prosecutions of Pregnant Women, 1973–2020 , Napw (Sept.18, 2021), https://www.nationaladvocatesforpregnantwomen.org/arrests-and-prosecutions-of-pregnant-women-1973-2020/ (summarizing the range of cases). See also Lynn M. Paltrow, Constitutional Rights for the ‘Unborn’ Would Force Women to Forfeit Theirs , Ms. Magazine (Apr. 15, 2021), https://msmagazine.com/2021/04/15/abortion-constitutional-rights-unborn-fetus-14th-amendment-womens-rights-pregnant/ (The rate of arrests and prosecutions is increasing. ‘From 2006–2020, we have documented over 1000 such arrests—more than double in half as many years. Black, Brown and low-income, rural white women are the typical targets of these arrests.’).
Thompson & Turcios Cruz, supra note 85 (noting that the Black defendants were also significantly more likely to be charged with felonies than white women, with 85% of Black women receiving felony charges compared to 71% of white women); see also Lynn M. Paltrow, Roe v. Wade and the New Jane Crow: Reproductive Rights in the Age of Mass Incarceration , 103 Am. J. Pub. Health 17, 19 (2013). Note that healthcare experts object strenuously to these prosecutions on the grounds that they deter people from seeking treatment essential both to their own welfare and to that of the fetus. See eg Katherine C. Arnold, Viewpoint: Criminalizing Young Women is not the Way to Improve Birth Outcomes , The Oklahoman (Dec. 26, 2021, 5:00 AM), https://www.oklahoman.com/story/opinion/2021/12/26/viewpoint-prosecuting-oklahoma-women-who-miscarry-wrong/8930865002/ .
While beyond the scope of this Article, it bears noting the range of options that state lawmakers have given prosecutors, when it comes to abortion crimes, outlawing things like purchasing abortion medicine, or aiding and assisting an abortion. See eg Emily Bazelon, A Mother in Jail for Helping her Daughter Have an Abortion , N.Y. Times (Sept. 22, 2014), https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/22/magazine/a-mother-in-jail-for-helping-her-daughter-have-an-abortion.html . See also Sabrina Tavernese, Citizens, not the State, Will Enforce New Abortion Law in Texas , N.Y. Times (Nov. 1, 2021), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/09/us/abortion-law-regulations-texas.html (Describing the ways that Texas S.B. Eight criminalizes all those who aid and assist abortion, and quoting Prof. Melissa Murray, ‘If the barista at Starbucks overhears you talking about your abortion, and it was performed after six weeks, that barista is authorized to sue the clinic where you obtained the abortion and to sue any other person who helped you, like the Uber driver who took you there.’).
See Paltrow , supra note 91. See generally Michele Bratcher Goodwin, Invisible Women: Mass Incarceration’s Forgotten Casualties , 94 Tex. L. Rev. (2015).
See Race & Justice News: Eliminating Crack/Cocaine Sentencing Disparity The Sentencing Project (July 27, 2021), https://www.sentencingproject.org/news/race-justice-news-senate-hearing-crack-cocaine-sentencing-disparity/ (summarizing the ongoing work toward sentencing equality in drug crimes, starting with the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act). On the negative downstream consequences of race bias in drug law enforcement, Republican Governor Asa Hutchinson noted that racial disparities, “undermined community confidence in the fairness of the criminal justice system. I talked with drug task force officers and front-line agents at the DEA who said this sense of injustice had a real impact in the fight against illegal drugs; it made it more difficult for agents to build trust and work with informants in the areas most impacted by the crack epidemic. The disparity in sentencing led to more harm than help in our federal anti-crime efforts.” ( Gov. Asa Hutchinson: It’s Time to Fix an Old Wrong and End the Disparity Between Crack and Cocaine Offenses , Fox News (June 8, 2021)), https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/end-crack-cocaine-offenses-gov-asa-hutchinson .
See Caroline Kitchener, The Texas Abortion ban has a Medical Exception. But some Doctors Worry it’s too Narrow to use, The Lily, Oct. 22, 2021 (describing existing legal protections and the limitations of Texas S.B. 8’s ‘medical emergency’ exception to its abortion ban), https://www.thelily.com/the-texas-abortion-ban-has-a-medical-exception-but-some-doctors-worry-its-too-narrow-to-use/ .
See Michael Asimow, Federal, Administrative Adjudication Outside The Administrative Procedure Act 3–4 (2019) (classifying these hearings into three categories, according to level of formal process).
See Kari White, Subasri Narasimhan, Sophie A. Hartwig, Erin Carroll, Alexandra McBrayer, Samantha Hubbard, Rachel Rebouché, Melissa Kottke & Kelli Stidham Hall, Parental Involvement Policies for Minors Seeking Abortion in the Southeast and Quality of Care , Sexuality Rsch. & Soc. Pol’y (Jan. 18, 2021), https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13178-021-00539-0.pdf .
See David S. Cohen & Carole Joffe, Obstacle Course: The Everyday Struggle To Get An Abortion In America 209 (2020) (quoting Ohio doctor Chrisse France, decrying this standard in U.S. practice today; ‘She cannot be seen at our public hospital unless pretty much she’s going to die today or maybe tomorrow’).
See Kari White, Subasri Narasimhan, Sophie A. Hartwig, Erin Carroll, Alexandra McBrayer, Samantha Hubbard, Rachel Rebouché, Melissa Kottke & Kelli Stidham Hall, Parental Involvement Policies for Minors Seeking Abortion in the Southeast and Quality of Care , Sexuality Rsch. & Soc. Pol’y (Feb., 2021) (noting the impact of these policies in delaying access to early abortion among those ultimately deemed eligible to end their pregnancies).
See Herbert L. Packer & Ralph J. Gampell, Therapeutic Abortion: A Problem in Law and Medicine , 11 Stan. L. Rev. 417, 418, 421 (1959). (Explaining that hospitals developed protocols at least in part as a defensive measure: to protect themselves from potential downstream criminal or civil liability). See also, Carole Joffe, Doctors Of Conscience 31 (1995) (describing how doctors who performed abortions illegally would do so outside of the hospital setting, but legal abortions that met the test of necessary to save life would necessarily have been performed in a hospital, thereby implicating both medical and hospital oversight).
See generally Packer & Gampell, id . at 418 . (Noting these questions, among others: Is the procedure limited to cases where its purpose is to avoid shortening the pregnant woman’s life? If so, how do we determine whether carrying the child to term will shorten life? If not, what other considerations are relevant? Is a threat to health necessarily a threat to life? Must the threat to life (or health) be on account of a somatic illness? Or is the woman’s mental condition also to be considered? If so, is a probability that suicide will ensue a justification for therapeutic abortion?). For a searing indictment of U.S. therapeutic abortion committee practices in the mid-twentieth century, see Rickie Solinger, ‘A Complete Disaster:’ Abortion and the Politics of Hospital Abortion Committees, 1950–1970 , 19 Feminist Stud. 241 (1993).
See Packer & Gampell, supra note 100, at 449. (‘[R]eputable members of the medical profession may well find it galling that their freedom from criminal and civil liability turns merely on the nonenforcement of provisions of the law which, on their face, appear to embrace the conduct in question.’). Texas’s S.B. 8 law employs such a threat by way of subjecting doctors who provide abortions after six weeks to civil suit. See Sabrina Tavernese, supra note 75.
Id. at 421 (citing Alan F. Guttmacher, The Shrinking Non-Psychiatric Indications for Therapeutic Abortion , in Therapeutic Abortion 12 (Rosen, ed. 1954)).
Id . at 430. Their study concluded with a call for law reform—a call that was echoed by their Canadian counterparts in the 1977 Badgley report, which found “gross inequities existed in the availability of therapeutic abortion to the women of Canada.” W.D.S. Thomas, The Badgley Report on the Abortion Law, 116 Can. Med. Ass’n. J. 966, 966 (1977).
See Carole Joffe and Jody Steinauer, Evan Texas Allows Abortions to Protect a Woman’s Life. Or Does It? , N.Y. Times (Sept. 12, 2021), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/12/opinion/abortion-texas-roe.html (describing how contemporary abortion bans will likewise challenge medical integrity).
See Oberman, supra note 2, at 13–42 (describing the highly public Salvadoran case of Beatriz, a woman forced to continue a life-threatening pregnancy until her doctors agreed that death was imminent, which then triggered her right to self-defense, permitting doctors to end her pregnancy).
For a thoughtful consideration of the constitutional protections owed to one who is pregnant, when abortion is illegal, see Meghan Boone, Reproductive Due Process , 88 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 511, 526 (2020) (‘Beyond its flexibility and ability to evolve, a third feature of due process is simply its function as a catchall constitutional backstop for determining the fairness of government action’).
See Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976) (“Identification of the specific dictates of due process generally requires consideration of three distinct factors: first, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and, finally, the Government’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirements would entail.”). See also Simona Grossi, Procedural Due Process , 13 Seton Hall Cir. Rev. 155, 158 (2017) (‘[A]…procedural law that is not supported by logic, fairness, and efficiency considerations,…violates due process.’).
See Chotiner, supra note 5, (citing Marjorie Dannenfelser).
See eg Box v. Planned Parenthood, 139 S. Ct. 1780 at 1783 (Thomas, J., concurring) (supporting an Indiana law banning abortion on grounds of fetal anomaly by invoking the state’s ‘compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.’).
See eg Eli Rosenberg, Clarence Thomas Tried to Link Abortion to Eugenics. Seven Historians Told the Post He’s Wrong , Wash. Post (May 30, 2019, 9:50 PM), https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2019/05/31/clarence-thomas-tried-link-abortion-eugenics-sevenhistorians-told-post-hes-wrong [ https://perma.cc/5DNR-PJT5 ]; Imani Gandy, When It Comes to Birth Control and Eugenics, Clarence Thomas Gets It All Wrong , Rewire (May 29, 2019, 5:11 PM), https://rewire.news/ablc/2019/05/29/when-it-comes-to-birth-control-and-eugenics-clarencethomas-gets-it-all-wrong [ https://perma.cc/3HZ3-689B ]; Lydia O’Connor, What Justice Clarence Thomas Gets Wrong About Eugenics and Abortion , Huff. Post (May 29, 2019, 5:50 PM), https://www.huffpost.com/entry/clarence-thomas-eugenics-abortion_n_5ced6c87e4b0356205a07182 [ https://perma.cc/6AHJ-MS5U ].
See Melissa Murray, Race-ing Roe: Reproductive Justice, Racial Justice, and the Battle for Roe v. Wade , 134 Harv. L. Rev. 2025 (2021) (providing a compelling response to the eugenics charge); see also Jennifer L. Holland, Tiny You: A Western History Of The Anti-Abortion Movement (2020) (arguing that the goals of the anti-abortion movement are deeply entwined with those of the white supremacy movement). Indeed, one might find evidence of racism in the suggestion that adoption is the best solution for poor Black and brown babies, which echoes the U.S. Indian Adoption Project of 1958–1967, under which as many as one-third of indigenous children were separated from their families. 85% of those children were placed in non-native homes or institutions. See Stephanie Woodward, Native Americans Expose The Adoption Era and Repair Its Devastation , Indian Country Today (updated Sept. 13, 2018), https://indiancountrytoday.com/archive/native-americans-expose-the-adoption-era-and-repair-its-devastation .
Reproductive Justice–Sister Song https://www.sistersong.net/reproductive-justice . See also, Mission and Vision , If, When, How, https://www.ifwhenhow.org/about/mission-vision/ [ https://perma.cc/3RRJ-LKT5 ] (last visited Dec. 21, 2021) (A leading reproductive justice organization, their vision statement reads: ‘We envision a transformation of the legal systems and institutions that perpetuate oppression into structures that realize justice, and a future when all people can self-determine their reproductive lives free from discrimination, coercion, or violence.’).
They might begin by looking to Germany. Not, as Chief Justice Roberts suggested in the Dobbs oral argument, because its law restricting abortion to 12 weeks’ gestation is a good compromise. (Transcript of Oral Argument at 53–55, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, No. 19-1392). Rather, because of the story of how anti-abortion German lawmakers concluded that the best way to deter abortion was to enact, along with a partial ban, “a suite of services that had to be made available to women and families as part of any law regulating abortion: financial assistance for stay-at-home parents; a guaranteed return to a parent’s prior job if he or she took off up to three years to care for a child; extended day care and extensive tax credits for day care costs; increases for child support payments; extended paid leave to care for sick children; reemployment guarantees for empty nesters; sex education services; and a host of other measures relating to adoption, housing and taxation.” Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights Is Tearing America Apart 130 (2021).
See Chotiner interview, supra note 5. (“We make sure there’s child care in the first few years of that child’s life that’s cheap or free. That’s going to look very different in Minnesota than it does in Georgia. In Minnesota, there very well may be a political appetite for passing more state-supported aid…. There is not a one-size-fits-all when it comes to…how the needs of women will be met. That is vital work for the pro-life movement, and the Republican Party.”).
See Isaac Chotiner, How Pandemics Change History , The New Yorker (Mar. 3, 2020), https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-pandemics-change-history (quoting Frank M. Snowden).
Author notes
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
April 2022 | 49 |
May 2022 | 2,191 |
June 2022 | 3,863 |
July 2022 | 2,219 |
August 2022 | 959 |
September 2022 | 1,528 |
October 2022 | 1,936 |
November 2022 | 2,280 |
December 2022 | 1,666 |
January 2023 | 801 |
February 2023 | 994 |
March 2023 | 1,161 |
April 2023 | 1,163 |
May 2023 | 848 |
June 2023 | 572 |
July 2023 | 578 |
August 2023 | 492 |
September 2023 | 714 |
October 2023 | 1,391 |
November 2023 | 1,501 |
December 2023 | 958 |
January 2024 | 997 |
February 2024 | 1,282 |
March 2024 | 1,374 |
April 2024 | 1,576 |
May 2024 | 917 |
June 2024 | 481 |
July 2024 | 405 |
Email alerts
Citing articles via.
- Recommend to your Library
Affiliations
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Duke University School of Law](https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/data/SiteBuilderAssets/Live/Images/jlb/jlb_f1360177977.png)
- Online ISSN 2053-9711
- Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press and Harvard, Duke and Stanford Law Schools
- About Oxford Academic
- Publish journals with us
- University press partners
- What we publish
- New features
- Open access
- Institutional account management
- Rights and permissions
- Get help with access
- Accessibility
- Advertising
- Media enquiries
- Oxford University Press
- Oxford Languages
- University of Oxford
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide
- Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
- Cookie settings
- Cookie policy
- Privacy policy
- Legal notice
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
- Skip to main content
- Keyboard shortcuts for audio player
A World Without Legal Abortion: How Activists Envision A 'Post-Roe' Nation
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Sarah McCammon 2018 square](https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2018/10/16/sarah-mccammon_sq-7641aada94d75c54a208803f3bb6107000255b6e.jpg?s=100&c=85&f=jpeg)
Sarah McCammon
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/10/26/prolife_custom-969ccec584244b42303e7558a1f9a10d013ddadf.jpg?s=1100&c=50&f=jpeg)
Anti-abortion-rights activists participate in the March for Life rally near the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 24. Susan Walsh/AP hide caption
Anti-abortion-rights activists participate in the March for Life rally near the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 24.
Judge Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court confirmation could open the door to a world that many anti-abortion-rights activists have been envisioning for decades.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay A Look At Amy Coney Barrett's Record On Abortion Rights](https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/09/28/ConeyBarrettandTrump_sq-b36211be667ecde1422fc974bfae1e362d98b554.jpg?s=100&c=85&f=jpeg)
A Look At Amy Coney Barrett's Record On Abortion Rights
"I hope and pray that we will be in a world post- Roe v. Wade ," said Carrie Murray Nellis, 41, an adoption attorney based in Georgia.
Murray Nellis is the founder of Abiding Love Adoptions, which operates in Georgia, Florida and Alabama. She hopes Barrett's confirmation will lead to the overturning of the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide, which would thereby allow states to further restrict or ban the procedure.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay With Roe v. Wade On The Line, Some States Take Steps To Protect Abortion Rights](https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/10/01/gettyimages-1195831647_sq-5c90d7d72c4b48c65b8b8a9135efe588bc6d4bda.jpg?s=100&c=85&f=jpeg)
With Roe v. Wade On The Line, Some States Take Steps To Protect Abortion Rights
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Americans' Support For Abortion Rights Wanes As Pregnancy Progresses](https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2018/06/12/ap_18019742595242_sq-d43df7fcc3f7a566e4b3f0b50b5da96d8b89eba7.jpg?s=100&c=85&f=jpeg)
Americans' Support For Abortion Rights Wanes As Pregnancy Progresses
Preparing for a post- Roe s ociety
Murray Nellis believes organizations like hers, which works primarily with birth mothers who are choosing adoption for their babies, need to be ready to help more women facing unplanned pregnancies.
"We as a pro-life community have got to get ready and get our ducks in a row," she said. "Because this could likely be happening, and I don't think we're ready."
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/10/26/heather-lawless---reliance-center---credit-stellar-styles-photography-lewiston-idaho-e6894f88169b3294987bf438aa18b2cbd73093de.jpg?s=1100&c=50&f=jpeg)
Heather Lawless, 39, is co-founder of the Reliance Center in Idaho, which counsels women against abortion and provides services for new and expectant mothers. Stellar Styles Photography, Lewiston, Idaho hide caption
Heather Lawless, 39, is co-founder of the Reliance Center in Idaho, which counsels women against abortion and provides services for new and expectant mothers.
Persuasion and the law
A majority of Americans favor some restrictions on abortion but support Roe v. Wade , according to national polls. But activists dedicated to the goal of ending abortion in the U.S. have been organizing for decades at every level of government. They often say their goal is to make abortion both " illegal and unthinkable ."
"There's always a reason why a woman is choosing abortion," said Heather Lawless, co-founder of the Reliance Center in Idaho, which counsels women against abortion and offers free pregnancy tests and screenings for sexually transmitted infections. "And I believe that if we work together, we can provide them with the resources and the tools that they need to not make that choice."
Lawless said that this can mean helping a pregnant woman find housing or get treatment for addiction. But ultimately, she said, abortion should not be a choice.
"I don't think abortion should be legal, period. Because abortion at any stage is willfully taking a human life, and I don't think that should be legal — at all," Lawless said.
That includes, Lawless said, pregnancies resulting from rape or incest.
Questions of enforcement
Banning abortion would mean civil or criminal penalties for those who are convicted of violating those laws. In the post- Roe world Lawless envisions, doctors could be prosecuted for providing the procedure, though Lawless said she would not support penalties for pregnant patients.
Murray Nellis, the adoption attorney from Georgia, said she supports early-abortion bans like one passed in 2019 in her state, which critics said was less than clear about how it would be enforced and against whom. That law, as well as several other so-called "heartbeat laws" in other states, has been blocked in federal court. But advocates hope the Supreme Court might use such a law as an opportunity to reconsider Roe and related precedent.
Murray Nellis said she would not want to see patients punished if abortion were banned.
"I just think that that is cruel," she said. "I just think the responsibility and liability should be at the hands of the individual she [would be] literally paying to do something illegal."
That's the position of many of the major national anti-abortion-rights activist groups. But it's not a universal one.
Catherine Davis is the founder of the Restoration Project, a group based in Georgia that promotes an anti-abortion message primarily among African American pastors. She hopes to see abortion banned nationwide. Davis said the focus of prosecution should be on doctors, though she wouldn't rule out one day punishing women who induce their own abortions.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2020/10/26/catherine-davis---photo-credit-charles-joseph-4952a0b1d0a42913ea9b5d175e86cd77d06c5e45.jpg?s=1100&c=50&f=jpeg)
Catherine Davis is founder of the Restoration Project, a group in Georgia that opposes abortion rights. Charles Joseph/Courtesy Catherine Davis hide caption
"If she decides to self-abort herself, then she's subjected to the same penalty as the doctor," Davis said.
Davis said she believes abortion should be treated exactly like murder — up to and including capital punishment.
"If a doctor makes the decision in a jurisdiction that he or she knows the penalty for taking the life of another human being is the death penalty, and they decide to do it anyway, then they've subjected themselves to the death penalty," Davis said.
Punishing women?
Mary Ziegler, the Stearns Weaver Miller professor at Florida State University College of Law, said that while many groups opposed to abortion rights have historically said they wouldn't support laws that punish pregnant women who get abortions, the growing availability of medication to self-induce abortion at home could complicate that position.
"I don't see how you do that without punishing women, because we're going to be in an environment where women can end pregnancies without a third-party being present," she said.
Leslie Reagan is a history professor at the University of Illinois and author of the book When Abortion Was a Crime. If Roe falls, Reagan said, women will still seek out illegal and sometimes unsafe abortions, as they did before Roe .
Reagan said activists who've been organizing with that thought in mind for decades are likely to insist on enforcing state abortion bans.
"We have a movement — a religiously based movement that's led by the churches and can organize out of the church — that wants these laws changed and will want these laws enforced," Reagan said.
In written responses to Senate Judiciary Committee members, Judge Amy Coney Barrett declines to say, if Roe is overturned, whether states could: -ban IVF -make abortion, use of certain contraceptives a felony -make abortion a crime punishable by death https://t.co/WsAIacjquC pic.twitter.com/gaTJmKjxTB — Sarah McCammon📻 (@sarahmccammon) October 22, 2020
It's impossible to know how any justice might rule in a given case. But in a written exchange with Senate Judiciary Committee members, Barrett was asked if states could make getting an abortion a felony or a capital crime punishable by death.
Barrett responded that as a judge and Supreme Court nominee, "It would not be appropriate for me to offer an opinion on abstract legal issues or hypotheticals."
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay With Abortion Restrictions On The Rise, Some Women Induce Their Own](https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2019/09/12/npr-commission-2-final-revised-crop-abortion_sq-584d813a5f8240d34229fed86c58ee7010583ba0.jpg?s=100&c=85&f=jpeg)
With Abortion Restrictions On The Rise, Some Women Induce Their Own
- Supreme Court
- judge amy coney barrett
- punishing women
- Abortion: Effects and Legalization Words: 1141
- Pros and Cons of Abortion Words: 1102
- Ethics in Practice: Abortion Choice Words: 4368
- Abortion: Arguments in Support Words: 1382
- Should Abortions be Legal? Words: 2403
- The Advantages and the Dangers of Abortion Words: 1527
- Abortion as a Controversy Words: 2241
- Decriminalizing Abortion for Women’s Health’s Sake Words: 1371
- Is Abortion Beneficial or Harmful To a Teenager? Words: 4208
- Abortion: Comparing Advantages and Disadvantages Words: 2587
- Should Abortions Be Legal? Arguments For and Against Words: 942
- The Abortion Law in Ireland and Canada Words: 1931
- Abortion Legalization and Its Implications Words: 1758
- Analysis of Advantages and Disadvantages of Abortion Words: 2004
Should Abortion Be Banned?
Introduction, arguments for banning of abortion, counterarguments and refutation, works cited.
The issue of abortion has led to divergent opinions in the US with the pro-life activists advocating its illegalization and their pro-choice counterparts arguing in its favor. Pro-choice crusaders assert that a pregnant woman ought to be accorded the right to either sire the child or carry out an abortion before birth. One rationale behind their argument is that such a lady might have been a rape victim who is not prepared to get a baby (Sedgh et al. 224). In contrast, pro-life activists affirm that options should be established instead of abortion, for example, presenting the child for adoption. The reason they give for their position is that if all women were to undertake abortion and not get any child, the continuity of human life would be threatened. Abortion is a contentious and divisive topic in the community, civilization, and politics of the United States, and numerous anti-abortion rules have been in effect in all states from around 1900.
Pro-life activists assert that other options might be preferable in place of abortion. They state that only fewer than 20% of all cases of abortion are associated with rape or even minors (Thomas et al. 358). Therefore, they maintain that among the most effective solutions to the avoidance of abortion is engaging in protected sex when is not prepared to rear a baby. A different practice would be to get the baby and present it to be cared for by other willing individuals rather than termination of its life. One might contact organizations dedicated to nurturing babies who lack proper parents or allow adoption as some amicable solutions against abortion. Some women strongly desire to have a child, which does not happen attributable to infertility. The existence of options for abortion shows that the practice is needless and condemnable regardless of the reason provided.
Pro-life crusaders state that abortion should be banned because in nearly all occurrences it makes the patient develop health complications. For example, many females have experienced hemorrhage, infections, and sometimes death during or even after abortion. Breast cancer is one of the most widespread risks of undertaking abortion attributable to the altered or disrupted structure of the mammary glands (Thomas et al. 359). Carcinogenic practices are apparent in transitional cells of females who have had an abortion. Each time a woman carries out an abortion, she increases the possibility of developing breast cancer. Furthermore, more than a quarter of the females who get abortion-associated cancer lose their lives. Irrespective of the short-lived relief following an abortion, nearly all the women and girls who carry it out report related psychological problems. Some of the signs of abortion-associated psychological problems include flashbacks, guilt, substance use/abuse, anger, suicidal thoughts, hallucination, and sexual dysfunction. Ensuing problems after abortion establishes that it is an unsafe and risky practice that ought to be banned.
Abortion should be illegalized because it is tantamount to murder as it entails the termination of the life of an already living creature. After four weeks of pregnancy, the developing embryo already has a pumping heart, and the appearance of mouth, ears, nose, limbs, and brain follows closely. During that time, there is the possibility of recording brainwaves and perception of heartbeat (White et al. 190). Additionally, there is the emergence of bones, and the unborn child begins to reflectively respond to stimuli. Since these processes are already in existence before the period of any likely abortion, it is evident that undertaking the practices should be illegal because it subjects the unborn baby to agonizing pain and suffering.
The pro-choice drive is established on the belief that no female should be compelled by the regulations in a country to have a baby contrary to her will whenever valid and substantial reasons are given. The argument provided is that siring a child should be a private familial affair, which should not be troubled. The pro-choice conviction is based on the notion that the life of a person begins after birth (Aiken et al. 396). Nevertheless, the American Life League marks a pro-life group that maintains that the right to life should be given to a human being from the fertilization phase hence the need to illegalize abortion.
Consistent with the affirmations of the pro-choice crusaders, bestowing on the embryo or fetus the sense of life infringes the rights of pregnant women for interfering with their independence. Additionally, banning abortion is a way of hindering girls from obtaining the help of health providers when they require tackling some medical concerns. Calling for the illegalization of abortion is being insensitive. For example, illegalization disregards how the education and later life of a teenager who becomes pregnant out of rape are irreparably damaged. This would lead to some female students becoming truants or school dropouts (Jones and Jerman 4). Another aspect that is ignored in the illegalization of abortion is the trauma that a family would suffer while nurturing an unwanted baby. Nonetheless, since there is only a small proportion of teenagers who become pregnant after incidences of rape, the illegalization of abortion would have an insignificant impact on adolescent girls.
The pro-choice movement is convinced that pro-life activists do not consider the fact that the law (such as the illegalization of abortion) will not prevent girls from becoming pregnant and clandestinely going for an abortion. Additionally, although most narcotic drugs are illegal, people are still using them secretly (Sedgh et al. 227). In the same way, enacting laws that illegalize abortion will result in many pregnant girls having abortions in unsafe settings that may leave them at the risk of death over and above the termination of the life of the embryo or fetus. The point is that if a pregnant woman or lady carries an unwanted pregnancy and has the determination of aborting it, they will still do it regardless of whether it is legal or banned. It is irrational for some people to put much significance on the need for an unborn child to live while overlooking the degree to which such a practice jeopardizes the mother’s life and welfare. However, it is imperative for laws to be enacted to control vices devoid of providing reasons for the irrelevance of such regulations.
Abortion leads to the intentional termination of a pregnancy prior to birth. It has elicited mixed feelings with one group establishing that pregnant girl should have the independence of either aborting or bearing the child. However, a different group asserts that options such as adoption should be practiced rather than abortion that denies the unborn child the right to life. Abortion is an argumentative and divisive subject in American civilization, community, and politics, and many anti-abortion guidelines have been in operation in all states since about 1900. Since the illegalization of abortion outshines the advocacy for its legalization, the practice should be banned.
Aiken, Abigail, et al. “Requests for Abortion in Latin America in the Wake of Zika Virus.” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 375, no. 4, 2016, pp. 396-400.
Jones, Rachel, and Jenna Jerman. “Abortion Incidence and Service Availability in the United States, 2011.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 46, no. 1, 2014, pp. 3-14.
Sedgh, Gilda, et al. “Adolescent Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion Rates across Countries: Levels and Recent Trends.” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 56, no. 2, 2015, pp. 223-230.
Thomas, Rachel, et al. “Anti-Legal Attitude toward Abortion among Abortion Patients in the United States.” Contraception, vol. 96, no. 5, 2017, pp. 357-364.
White, Kari, et al. “Women’s Knowledge of and Support for Abortion Restrictions in Texas: Findings from a Statewide Representative Survey.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 48, no. 4, 2016, pp. 189-197.
Cite this paper
- Chicago (N-B)
- Chicago (A-D)
StudyCorgi. (2022, March 7). Should Abortion Be Banned? https://studycorgi.com/should-abortion-be-banned/
"Should Abortion Be Banned?" StudyCorgi , 7 Mar. 2022, studycorgi.com/should-abortion-be-banned/.
StudyCorgi . (2022) 'Should Abortion Be Banned'. 7 March.
1. StudyCorgi . "Should Abortion Be Banned?" March 7, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/should-abortion-be-banned/.
Bibliography
StudyCorgi . "Should Abortion Be Banned?" March 7, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/should-abortion-be-banned/.
StudyCorgi . 2022. "Should Abortion Be Banned?" March 7, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/should-abortion-be-banned/.
This paper, “Should Abortion Be Banned?”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.
Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: July 24, 2023 .
If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pro-papers.com/images/cabinet/white-loader.png)
Please wait while we process your request
Abortion Argumentative Essay: Definitive Guide
Academic writing
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pro-papers.com/images/eye-icon.png)
Abortion remains a debatable issue even today, especially in countries like the USA, where a controversial ban was upheld in 13 states at the point this article was written. That’s why an essay on abortion has become one of the most popular tasks in schools, colleges, and universities. When writing this kind of essay, students learn to express their opinion, find and draw arguments and examples, and conduct research.
It’s very easy to speculate on topics like this. However, this makes it harder to find credible and peer-reviewed information on the topic that isn’t merely someone’s opinion. If you were assigned this kind of academic task, do not lose heart. In this article, we will provide you with all the tips and tricks for writing about abortion.
Where to begin?
Conversations about abortion are always emotional. Complex stories, difficult decisions, bitter moments, and terrible diagnoses make this topic hard to cover. Some young people may be shocked by this assignment, while others would be happy to express their opinion on the matter.
One way or another, this topic doesn't leave anyone indifferent. However, it shouldn’t have an effect on the way you approach the research and writing process. What should you remember when working on an argumentative essay about abortion?
- Don’t let your emotions take over. As this is an academic paper, you have to stay impartial and operate with facts. The topic is indeed sore and burning, causing thousands of scandals on the Internet, but you are writing it for school, not a Quora thread.
- Try to balance your opinions. There are always two sides to one story, even if the story is so fragile. You need to present an issue from different angles. This is what your tutors seek to teach you.
- Be tolerant and mind your language. It is very important not to hurt anybody with the choice of words in your essay. So make sure you avoid any possible rough words. It is important to respect people with polar opinions, especially when it comes to academic writing.
- Use facts, not claims. Your essay cannot be based solely on your personal ideas – your conclusions should be derived from facts. Roe v. Wade case, WHO or Mayo Clinic information, and CDC are some of the sources you can rely on.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Arguments for and against abortion](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content-upload/2016/12/Arguments-for-and-against-abortion.png)
Speaking of Outline
An argumentative essay on abortion outline is a must-have even for experienced writers. In general, each essay, irrespective of its kind or topic, has a strict outline. It may be brief or extended, but the major parts are always the same:
- Introduction. This is a relatively short paragraph that starts with a hook and presents the background information on the topic. It should end with a thesis statement telling your reader what your main goal or idea is.
- Body. This section usually consists of 2-4 paragraphs. Each one has its own structure: main argument + facts to support it + small conclusion and transition into the next paragraph.
- Conclusion. In this part, your task is to summarize all your thoughts and come to a general conclusive idea. You may have to restate some info from the body and your thesis statement and add a couple of conclusive statements without introducing new facts.
Why is it important to create an outline?
- You will structure your ideas. We bet you’ve got lots on your mind. Writing them down and seeing how one can flow logically into the other will help you create a consistent paper. Naturally, you will have to abandon some of the ideas if they don’t fit the overall narrative you’re building.
- You can get some inspiration. While creating your outline, which usually consists of some brief ideas, you can come up with many more to research. Some will add to your current ones or replace them with better options.
- You will find the most suitable sources. Argumentative essay writing requires you to use solid facts and trustworthy arguments built on them. When the topic is as controversial as abortion, these arguments should be taken from up-to-date, reliable sources. With an outline, you will see if you have enough to back up your ideas.
- You will write your text as professionals do. Most expert writers start with outlines to write the text faster and make it generally better. As you will have your ideas structured, the general flow of thoughts will be clear. And, of course, it will influence your overall grade positively.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay abortion](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content-upload/2016/12/abortion.jpg)
Abortion Essay Introduction
The introduction is perhaps the most important part of the whole essay. In this relatively small part, you will have to present the issue under consideration and state your opinion on it. Here is a typical introduction outline:
- The first sentence is a hook grabbing readers' attention.
- A few sentences that go after elaborate on the hook. They give your readers some background and explain your research.
- The last sentence is a thesis statement showing the key idea you are building your text around.
Before writing an abortion essay intro, first thing first, you will need to define your position. If you are in favor of this procedure, what exactly made you think so? If you are an opponent of abortion, determine how to argue your position. In both cases, you may research the point of view in medicine, history, ethics, and other fields.
When writing an introduction, remember:
- Never repeat your title. First of all, it looks too obvious; secondly, it may be boring for your reader right from the start. Your first sentence should be a well-crafted hook. The topic of abortion worries many people, so it’s your chance to catch your audience’s attention with some facts or shocking figures.
- Do not make it too long. Your task here is to engage your audience and let them know what they are about to learn. The rest of the information will be disclosed in the main part. Nobody likes long introductions, so keep it short but informative.
- Pay due attention to the thesis statement. This is the central sentence of your introduction. A thesis statement in your abortion intro paragraph should show that you have a well-supported position and are ready to argue it. Therefore, it has to be strong and convey your idea as clearly as possible. We advise you to make several options for the thesis statement and choose the strongest one.
Hooks for an Abortion Essay
Writing a hook is a good way to catch the attention of your audience, as this is usually the first sentence in an essay. How to start an essay about abortion? You can begin with some shocking fact, question, statistics, or even a quote. However, always make sure that this piece is taken from a trusted resource.
Here are some examples of hooks you can use in your paper:
- As of July 1, 2022, 13 states banned abortion, depriving millions of women of control of their bodies.
- According to WHO, 125,000 abortions take place every day worldwide.
- Is abortion a woman’s right or a crime?
- Since 1994, more than 40 countries have liberalized their abortion laws.
- Around 48% of all abortions are unsafe, and 8% of them lead to women’s death.
- The right to an abortion is one of the reproductive and basic rights of a woman.
- Abortion is as old as the world itself – women have resorted to this method since ancient times.
- Only 60% of women in the world live in countries where pregnancy termination is allowed.
Body Paragraphs: Pros and Cons of Abortion
The body is the biggest part of your paper. Here, you have a chance to make your voice concerning the abortion issue heard. Not sure where to start? Facts about abortion pros and cons should give you a basic understanding of which direction to move in.
First things first, let’s review some brief tips for you on how to write the best essay body if you have already made up your mind.
Make a draft
It’s always a good idea to have a rough draft of your writing. Follow the outline and don’t bother with the word choice, grammar, or sentence structure much at first. You can polish it all later, as the initial draft will not likely be your final. You may see some omissions in your arguments, lack of factual basis, or repetitiveness that can be eliminated in the next versions.
Trust only reliable sources
This part of an essay includes loads of factual information, and you should be very careful with it. Otherwise, your paper may look unprofessional and cost you precious points. Never rely on sources like Wikipedia or tabloids – they lack veracity and preciseness.
Edit rigorously
It’s best to do it the next day after you finish writing so that you can spot even the smallest mistakes. Remember, this is the most important part of your paper, so it has to be flawless. You can also use editing tools like Grammarly.
Determine your weak points
Since you are writing an argumentative essay, your ideas should be backed up by strong facts so that you sound convincing. Sometimes it happens that one argument looks weaker than the other. Your task is to find it and strengthen it with more or better facts.
Add an opposing view
Sometimes, it’s not enough to present only one side of the discussion. Showing one of the common views from the opposing side might actually help you strengthen your main idea. Besides, making an attempt at refuting it with alternative facts can show your teacher or professor that you’ve researched and analyzed all viewpoints, not just the one you stand by.
If you have chosen a side but are struggling to find the arguments for or against it, we have complied abortion pro and cons list for you. You can use both sets if you are writing an abortion summary essay covering all the stances.
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Why Should Abortion Be Legal
If you stick to the opinion that abortion is just a medical procedure, which should be a basic health care need for each woman, you will definitely want to write the pros of abortion essay. Here is some important information and a list of pros about abortion for you to use:
- Since the fetus is a set of cells – not an individual, it’s up to a pregnant woman to make a decision concerning her body. Only she can decide whether she wants to keep the pregnancy or have an abortion. The abortion ban is a violation of a woman’s right to have control over her own body.
- The fact that women and girls do not have access to effective contraception and safe abortion services has serious consequences for their own health and the health of their families.
- The criminalization of abortion usually leads to an increase in the number of clandestine abortions. Many years ago, fetuses were disposed of with improvised means, which included knitting needles and half-straightened metal hangers. 13% of women’s deaths are the result of unsafe abortions.
- Many women live in a difficult financial situation and cannot support their children financially. Having access to safe abortion takes this burden off their shoulders. This will also not decrease their quality of life as the birth and childcare would.
- In countries where abortion is prohibited, there is a phenomenon of abortion tourism to other countries where it can be done without obstacles. Giving access to this procedure can make the lives of women much easier.
- Women should not put their lives or health in danger because of the laws that were adopted by other people.
- Girls and women who do not have proper sex education may not understand pregnancy as a concept or determine that they are pregnant early on. Instead of educating them and giving them a choice, an abortion ban forces them to become mothers and expects them to be fit parents despite not knowing much about reproduction.
- There are women who have genetic disorders or severe mental health issues that will affect their children if they're born. Giving them an option to terminate ensures that there won't be a child with a low quality of life and that the woman will not have to suffer through pregnancy, birth, and raising a child with her condition.
- Being pro-choice is about the freedom to make decisions about your body so that women who are for termination can do it safely, and those who are against it can choose not to do it. It is an inclusive option that caters to everyone.
- Women and girls who were raped or abused by their partner, caregiver, or stranger and chose to terminate the pregnancy can now be imprisoned for longer than their abusers. This implies that the system values the life of a fetus with no or primitive brain function over the life of a living woman.
- People who lived in times when artificial termination of pregnancy was scarcely available remember clandestine abortions and how traumatic they were, not only for the physical but also for the mental health of women. Indeed, traditionally, in many countries, large families were a norm. However, the times have changed, and supervised abortion is a safe and accessible procedure these days. A ban on abortion will simply push humanity away from the achievements of the civilized world.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay abortion2](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content-upload/2016/12/abortion2.jpg)
Types of abortion
There are 2 main types of abortions that can be performed at different pregnancy stages and for different reasons:
- Medical abortion. It is performed by taking a specially prescribed pill. It does not require any special manipulations and can even be done at home (however, after a doctor’s visit and under supervision). It is considered very safe and is usually done during the very first weeks of pregnancy.
- Surgical abortion. This is a medical operation that is done with the help of a suction tube. It then removes the fetus and any related material. Anesthesia is used for this procedure, and therefore, it can only be done in a hospital. The maximum time allowed for surgical abortion is determined in each country specifically.
Cases when abortion is needed
Center for Reproductive Rights singles out the following situations when abortion is required:
- When there is a risk to the life or physical/mental health of a pregnant woman.
- When a pregnant woman has social or economic reasons for it.
- Upon the woman's request.
- If a pregnant woman is mentally or cognitively disabled.
- In case of rape and/or incest.
- If there were congenital anomalies detected in the fetus.
Countries and their abortion laws
- Countries where abortion is legalized in any case: Australia, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Sweden, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway, Ukraine, Moldova, Latvia, Lithuania, etc.
- Countries where abortion is completely prohibited: Angola, Venezuela, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Lebanon, Nicaragua, Oman, Paraguay, Palau, Jamaica, Laos, Haiti, Honduras, Andorra, Aruba, El Salvador, Dominican Republic, Sierra Leone, Senegal, etc.
- Countries where abortion is allowed for medical reasons: Afghanistan, Israel, Argentina, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Ghana, Israel, Morocco, Mexico, Bahamas, Central African Republic, Ecuador, Ghana, Algeria, Monaco, Pakistan, Poland, etc.
- Countries where abortion is allowed for both medical and socioeconomic reasons: England, India, Spain, Luxembourg, Japan, Finland, Taiwan, Zambia, Iceland, Fiji, Cyprus, Barbados, Belize, etc.
Why Abortion Should Be Banned
Essays against abortions are popular in educational institutions since we all know that many people – many minds. So if you don’t want to support this procedure in your essay, here are some facts that may help you to argument why abortion is wrong:
- Abortion at an early age is especially dangerous because a young woman with an unstable hormonal system may no longer be able to have children throughout her life. Termination of pregnancy disrupts the hormonal development of the body.
- Health complications caused by abortion can occur many years after the procedure. Even if a woman feels fine in the short run, the situation may change in the future.
- Abortion clearly has a negative effect on reproductive function. Artificial dilation of the cervix during an abortion leads to weak uterus tonus, which can cause a miscarriage during the next pregnancy.
- Evidence shows that surgical termination of pregnancy significantly increases the risk of breast cancer.
- In December 1996, the session of the Council of Europe on bioethics concluded that a fetus is considered a human being on the 14th day after conception.
You are free to use each of these arguments for essays against abortions. Remember that each claim should not be supported by emotions but by facts, figures, and so on.
Health complications after abortion
One way or another, abortion is extremely stressful for a woman’s body. Apart from that, it can even lead to various health problems in the future. You can also cover them in your cons of an abortion essay:
- Continuation of pregnancy. If the dose of the drug is calculated by the doctor in the wrong way, the pregnancy will progress.
- Uterine bleeding, which requires immediate surgical intervention.
- Severe nausea or even vomiting occurs as a result of a sharp change in the hormonal background.
- Severe stomach pain. Medical abortion causes miscarriage and, as a result, strong contractions of the uterus.
- High blood pressure and allergic reactions to medicines.
- Depression or other mental problems after a difficult procedure.
Abortion Essay Conclusion
After you have finished working on the previous sections of your paper, you will have to end it with a strong conclusion. The last impression is no less important than the first one. Here is how you can make it perfect in your conclusion paragraph on abortion:
- It should be concise. The conclusion cannot be as long as your essay body and should not add anything that cannot be derived from the main section. Reiterate the key ideas, combine some of them, and end the paragraph with something for the readers to think about.
- It cannot repeat already stated information. Restate your thesis statement in completely other words and summarize your main points. Do not repeat anything word for word – rephrase and shorten the information instead.
- It should include a call to action or a cliffhanger. Writing experts believe that a rhetorical question works really great for an argumentative essay. Another good strategy is to leave your readers with some curious ideas to ponder upon.
Abortion Facts for Essay
Abortion is a topic that concerns most modern women. Thousands of books, research papers, and articles on abortion are written across the world. Even though pregnancy termination has become much safer and less stigmatized with time, it still worries millions. What can you cover in your paper so that it can really stand out among others? You may want to add some shocking abortion statistics and facts:
- 40-50 million abortions are done in the world every year (approximately 125,000 per day).
- According to UN statistics, women have 25 million unsafe abortions each year. Most of them (97%) are performed in the countries of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. 14% of them are especially unsafe because they are done by people without any medical knowledge.
- Since 2017, the United States has shown the highest abortion rate in the last 30 years.
- The biggest number of abortion procedures happen in the countries where they are officially banned. The lowest rate is demonstrated in the countries with high income and free access to contraception.
- Women in low-income regions are three times more susceptible to unplanned pregnancies than those in developed countries.
- In Argentina, more than 38,000 women face dreadful health consequences after unsafe abortions.
- The highest teen abortion rates in the world are seen in 3 countries: England, Wales, and Sweden.
- Only 31% of teenagers decide to terminate their pregnancy. However, the rate of early pregnancies is getting lower each year.
- Approximately 13 million children are born to mothers under the age of 20 each year.
- 5% of women of reproductive age live in countries where abortions are prohibited.
We hope that this abortion information was useful for you, and you can use some of these facts for your own argumentative essay. If you find some additional facts, make sure that they are not manipulative and are taken from official medical resources.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay EXPOSITORY ESSAY ON ABORTION](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content-upload/2016/12/EXPOSITORY-ESSAY-ON-ABORTION.jpg)
Abortion Essay Topics
Do you feel like you are lost in the abundance of information? Don’t know what topic to choose among the thousands available online? Check our short list of the best abortion argumentative essay topics:
- Why should abortion be legalized essay
- Abortion: a murder or a basic human right?
- Why we should all support abortion rights
- Is the abortion ban in the US a good initiative?
- The moral aspect of teen abortions
- Can the abortion ban solve birth control problems?
- Should all countries allow abortion?
- What consequences can abortion have in the long run?
- Is denying abortion sexist?
- Why is abortion a human right?
- Are there any ethical implications of abortion?
- Do you consider abortion a crime?
- Should women face charges for terminating a pregnancy?
Want to come up with your own? Here is how to create good titles for abortion essays:
- Write down the first associations. It can be something that swirls around in your head and comes to the surface when you think about the topic. These won’t necessarily be well-written headlines, but each word or phrase can be the first link in the chain of ideas that leads you to the best option.
- Irony and puns are not always a good idea. Especially when it comes to such difficult topics as abortion. Therefore, in your efforts to be original, remain sensitive to the issue you want to discuss.
- Never make a quote as your headline. First, a wordy quote makes the headline long. Secondly, readers do not understand whose words are given in the headline. Therefore, it may confuse them right from the start. If you have found a great quote, you can use it as your hook, but don’t forget to mention its author.
- Try to briefly summarize what is said in the essay. What is the focus of your paper? If the essence of your argumentative essay can be reduced to one sentence, it can be used as a title, paraphrased, or shortened.
- Write your title after you have finished your text. Before you just start writing, you might not yet have a catchy phrase in mind to use as a title. Don’t let it keep you from working on your essay – it might come along as you write.
Abortion Essay Example
We know that it is always easier to learn from a good example. For this reason, our writing experts have complied a detailed abortion essay outline for you. For your convenience, we have created two options with different opinions.
Topic: Why should abortion be legal?
Introduction – hook + thesis statement + short background information
Essay hook: More than 59% of women in the world do not have access to safe abortions, which leads to dreading health consequences or even death.
Thesis statement: Since banning abortions does not decrease their rates but only makes them unsafe, it is not logical to ban abortions.
Body – each paragraph should be devoted to one argument
Argument 1: Woman’s body – women’s rules. + example: basic human rights.
Argument 2: Banning abortion will only lead to more women’s death. + example: cases of Polish women.
Argument 3: Only women should decide on abortion. + example: many abortion laws are made by male politicians who lack knowledge and first-hand experience in pregnancies.
Conclusion – restated thesis statement + generalized conclusive statements + cliffhanger
Restated thesis: The abortion ban makes pregnancy terminations unsafe without decreasing the number of abortions, making it dangerous for women.
Cliffhanger: After all, who are we to decide a woman’s fate?
Topic: Why should abortion be banned?
Essay hook: Each year, over 40 million new babies are never born because their mothers decide to have an abortion.
Thesis statement: Abortions on request should be banned because we cannot decide for the baby whether it should live or die.
Argument 1: A fetus is considered a person almost as soon as it is conceived. Killing it should be regarded as murder. + example: Abortion bans in countries such as Poland, Egypt, etc.
Argument 2: Interrupting a baby’s life is morally wrong. + example: The Bible, the session of the Council of Europe on bioethics decision in 1996, etc.
Argument 3: Abortion may put the reproductive health of a woman at risk. + example: negative consequences of abortion.
Restated thesis: Women should not be allowed to have abortions without serious reason because a baby’s life is as priceless as their own.
Cliffhanger: Why is killing an adult considered a crime while killing an unborn baby is not?
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Argumentative essay on pros and cons of abortion](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content-upload/2016/12/Argumentative-essay-on-pros-and-cons-of-abortion.png)
Examples of Essays on Abortion
There are many great abortion essays examples on the Web. You can easily find an argumentative essay on abortion in pdf and save it as an example. Many students and scholars upload their pieces to specialized websites so that others can read them and continue the discussion in their own texts.
In a free argumentative essay on abortion, you can look at the structure of the paper, choice of the arguments, depth of research, and so on. Reading scientific papers on abortion or essays of famous activists is also a good idea. Here are the works of famous authors discussing abortion.
A Defense of Abortion by Judith Jarvis Thomson
Published in 1971, this essay by an American philosopher considers the moral permissibility of abortion. It is considered the most debated and famous essay on this topic, and it’s definitely worth reading no matter what your stance is.
Abortion and Infanticide by Michael Tooley
It was written in 1972 by an American philosopher known for his work in the field of metaphysics. In this essay, the author considers whether fetuses and infants have the same rights. Even though this work is quite complex, it presents some really interesting ideas on the matter.
Some Biological Insights into Abortion by Garret Hardin
This article by American ecologist Garret Hardin, who had focused on the issue of overpopulation during his scholarly activities, presents some insights into abortion from a scientific point of view. He also touches on non-biological issues, such as moral and economic. This essay will be of great interest to those who support the pro-choice stance.
H4 Hidden in Plain View: An Overview of Abortion in Rural Illinois and Around the Globe by Heather McIlvaine-Newsad
In this study, McIlvaine-Newsad has researched the phenomenon of abortion since prehistoric times. She also finds an obvious link between the rate of abortions and the specifics of each individual country. Overall, this scientific work published in 2014 is extremely interesting and useful for those who want to base their essay on factual information.
H4 Reproduction, Politics, and John Irving’s The Cider House Rules: Women’s Rights or “Fetal Rights”? by Helena Wahlström
In her article of 2013, Wahlström considers John Irving’s novel The Cider House Rules published in 1985 and is regarded as a revolutionary work for that time, as it acknowledges abortion mostly as a political problem. This article will be a great option for those who want to investigate the roots of the abortion debate.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay incubator](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content-upload/2016/12/incubator.jpg)
FAQs On Abortion Argumentative Essay
- Is abortion immoral?
This question is impossible to answer correctly because each person independently determines their own moral framework. One group of people will say that abortion is a woman’s right because only she has power over her body and can make decisions about it. Another group will argue that the embryo is also a person and has the right to birth and life.
In general, the attitude towards abortion is determined based on the political and religious views of each person. Religious people generally believe that abortion is immoral because it is murder, while secular people see it as a normal medical procedure. For example, in the US, the ban on abortion was introduced in red states where the vast majority have conservative views, while blue liberal states do not support this law. Overall, it’s up to a person to decide whether they consider abortion immoral based on their own values and beliefs.
- Is abortion legal?
The answer to this question depends on the country in which you live. There are countries in which pregnancy termination is a common medical procedure and is performed at the woman's request. There are also states in which there must be a serious reason for abortion: medical, social, or economic. Finally, there are nations in which abortion is prohibited and criminalized. For example, in Jamaica, a woman can get life imprisonment for abortion, while in Kenya, a medical worker who volunteers to perform an abortion can be imprisoned for up to 14 years.
- Is abortion safe?
In general, modern medicine has reached such a level that abortion has become a common (albeit difficult from various points of view) medical procedure. There are several types of abortion, as well as many medical devices and means that ensure the maximum safety of the pregnancy termination. Like all other medical procedures, abortion can have various consequences and complications.
Abortions – whether safe or not - exist in all countries of the world. The thing is that more than half of them are dangerous because women have them in unsuitable conditions and without professional help. Only universal access to abortion in all parts of the world can make it absolutely safe. In such a case, it will be performed only after a thorough assessment and under the control of a medical professional who can mitigate the potential risks.
- How safe is abortion?
If we do not talk about the ethical side of the issue related to abortion, it still has some risks. In fact, any medical procedure has them to a greater or lesser extent.
The effectiveness of the safe method in a medical setting is 80-99%. An illegal abortion (for example, the one without special indications after 12 weeks) can lead to a patient’s death, and the person who performed it will be criminally liable in this case.
Doctors do not have universal advice for all pregnant women on whether it is worth making this decision or not. However, many of them still tend to believe that any contraception - even one that may have negative side effects - is better than abortion. That’s why spreading awareness on means of contraception and free access to it is vital.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pro-papers.com/images/back-green-icon.png)
Your email address will not be published / Required fields are marked *
Try it now!
Calculate your price
Number of pages:
Order an essay!
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pro-papers.com/images/moblile-block-1.png)
Fill out the order form
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pro-papers.com/images/moblile-block-2.png)
Make a secure payment
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pro-papers.com/images/moblile-block-3.png)
Receive your order by email
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pro-papers.com/images/button-arrow-deepblue-up.png)
Report writing
How to Write a Short Report?
A short report is a type of paper aimed at presenting only the main information on a certain topic without going into many details. If you want to write short reports, you should organize your text…
26th Oct 2022
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/blog-contributing/blog/Writing-a-perfect-coursework-on-English.jpg)
Writing a perfect coursework on English
Studentship, what an exciting period! A huge number of new friends, new subjects, new possibilities to show yourself. Time passes cheerfully and pleasantly. At this very time, there are some things…
10th Jul 2017
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/blog-contributing/blog/NOV14_20_writing1.jpg)
Research paper writing
Biology Research Topics
Finding a good research area is a challenging task. Moreover, the topic should be attention-grabbing, relevant, and interesting to the academic community. So it is necessary to analyze recent…
7th Mar 2019
Get your project done perfectly
Professional writing service
Reset password
We’ve sent you an email containing a link that will allow you to reset your password for the next 24 hours.
Please check your spam folder if the email doesn’t appear within a few minutes.
- Clerc Center | PK-12 & Outreach
- KDES | PK-8th Grade School (D.C. Metro Area)
- MSSD | 9th-12th Grade School (Nationwide)
- Gallaudet University Regional Centers
- Parent Advocacy App
- K-12 ASL Content Standards
- National Resources
- Youth Programs
- Academic Bowl
- Battle Of The Books
- National Literary Competition
- Youth Debate Bowl
- Youth Esports Series
- Bison Sports Camp
- Discover College and Careers (DC²)
- Financial Wizards
- Immerse Into ASL
- Alumni Relations
- Alumni Association
- Homecoming Weekend
- Class Giving
- Get Tickets / BisonPass
- Sport Calendars
- Cross Country
- Swimming & Diving
- Track & Field
- Indoor Track & Field
- Cheerleading
- Winter Cheerleading
- Human Resources
- Plan a Visit
- Request Info
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://gallaudet.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GU-Buff-White-768x593-1.png)
- Areas of Study
- Accessible Human-Centered Computing
- American Sign Language
- Art and Media Design
- Communication Studies
- Criminal Justice
- Data Science
- Deaf Studies
- Early Intervention Studies Graduate Programs
- Educational Neuroscience
- Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences
- Information Technology
- International Development
- Interpretation and Translation
- Linguistics
- Mathematics
- Philosophy and Religion
- Physical Education & Recreation
- Public Affairs
- Public Health
- Sexuality and Gender Studies
- Social Work
- Theatre and Dance
- World Languages and Cultures
- B.A. in American Sign Language
- B.A. in Biology
- B.A. in Communication Studies
- B.A. in Communication Studies for Online Degree Completion Program
- B.A. in Deaf Studies
- B.A. in Deaf Studies for Online Degree Completion Program
- B.A. in Education with a Specialization in Early Childhood Education
- B.A. in Education with a Specialization in Elementary Education
- B.A. in English
- B.A. in English for Online Degree Completion Program
- B.A. in Government
- B.A. in Government with a Specialization in Law
- B.A. in History
- B.A. in Interdisciplinary Spanish
- B.A. in International Studies
- B.A. in Mathematics
- B.A. in Philosophy
- B.A. in Psychology
- B.A. in Psychology for Online Degree Completion Program
- B.A. in Social Work (BSW)
- B.A. in Sociology with a concentration in Criminology
- B.A. in Theatre Arts: Production/Performance
- B.A. or B.S. in Education with a Specialization in Secondary Education: Science, English, Mathematics or Social Studies
- B.S. in Accounting
- B.S. in Accounting for Online Degree Completion Program
- B.S. in Biology
- B.S. in Business Administration
- B.S. in Business Administration for Online Degree Completion Program
- B.S. in Data Science
- B.S. in Information Technology
- B.S. in Mathematics
- B.S. in Physical Education and Recreation
- B.S. in Public Health
- B.S. in Risk Management and Insurance
- General Education
- Honors Program
- Peace Corps Prep program
- Self-Directed Major
- M.A. in Counseling: Clinical Mental Health Counseling
- M.A. in Counseling: School Counseling
- M.A. in Deaf Education
- M.A. in Deaf Education Studies
- M.A. in Deaf Studies: Cultural Studies
- M.A. in Deaf Studies: Language and Human Rights
- M.A. in Early Childhood Education and Deaf Education
- M.A. in Early Intervention Studies
- M.A. in Elementary Education and Deaf Education
- M.A. in International Development
- M.A. in Interpretation: Combined Interpreting Practice and Research
- M.A. in Interpretation: Interpreting Research
- M.A. in Linguistics
- M.A. in Secondary Education and Deaf Education
- M.A. in Sign Language Education
- M.S. in Accessible Human-Centered Computing
- M.S. in Speech-Language Pathology
- Master of Public Administration
- Master of Social Work (MSW)
- Au.D. in Audiology
- Ed.D. in Transformational Leadership and Administration in Deaf Education
- Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology
- Ph.D. in Critical Studies in the Education of Deaf Learners
- Ph.D. in Hearing, Speech, and Language Sciences
- Ph.D. in Linguistics
- Ph.D. in Translation and Interpreting Studies
- Ph.D. Program in Educational Neuroscience (PEN)
- Psy.D. in School Psychology
- Individual Courses and Training
- Fall Online Courses
- Summer Online Courses
- National Caregiver Certification Course
- Certificates
- Certificate in Sexuality and Gender Studies
- Educating Deaf Students with Disabilities (online, post-bachelor’s)
- American Sign Language and English Bilingual Early Childhood Deaf Education: Birth to 5 (online, post-bachelor’s)
- Early Intervention Studies
- Certificate in American Sign Language and English Bilingual Early Childhood Deaf Education: Birth to 5
- Online Degree Programs
- ODCP Minor in Communication Studies
- ODCP Minor in Deaf Studies
- ODCP Minor in Psychology
- ODCP Minor in Writing
- University Capstone Honors for Online Degree Completion Program
Quick Links
- PK-12 & Outreach
- NSO Schedule
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Wavy Decoration](https://gallaudet.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Wavy-Texture-buff-1.png)
Comparison/Contrast Essays: Two Patterns
202.448-7036
First Pattern: Block-by-Block
By Rory H. Osbrink
Abortion is an example of a very controversial issue. The two opposing viewpoints surrounding abortion are like two sides of a coin. On one side, there is the pro-choice activist and on the other is the pro-life activist.
The argument is a balanced one; for every point supporting abortion there is a counter-point condemning abortion. This essay will delineate the controversy in one type of comparison/contrast essay form: the “”Argument versus Argument,”” or, “”Block-by-Block”” format. In this style of writing, first you present all the arguments surrounding one side of the issue, then you present all the arguments surrounding the other side of the issue. You are generally not expected to reach a conclusion, but simply to present the opposing sides of the argument.
Introduction: (the thesis is underlined) Explains the argument
The Abortion Issue: Compare and Contrast Block-by-Block Format
One of the most divisive issues in America is the controversy surrounding abortion. Currently, abortion is legal in America, and many people believe that it should remain legal. These people, pro-choice activists, believe that it is the women’s right to chose whether or not to give birth. However, there are many groups who are lobbying Congress to pass laws that would make abortion illegal. These people are called the pro-life activists.
Explains pro-choice
Abortion is a choice that should be decided by each individual, argues the pro-choice activist. Abortion is not murder since the fetus is not yet fully human, therefore, it is not in defiance against God. Regardless of the reason for the abortion, it should be the woman’s choice because it is her body. While adoption is an option some women chose, many women do not want to suffer the physical and emotional trauma of pregnancy and labor only to give up a child. Therefore, laws should remain in effect that protect a woman’s right to chose.
Explains pro-life
Abortion is an abomination, argues the pro-life activist. It makes no sense for a woman to murder a human being not even born. The bible says, “”Thou shalt not kill,”” and it does not discriminate between different stages of life. A fetus is the beginning of life. Therefore, abortion is murder, and is in direct defiance of God’s will. Regardless of the mother’s life situation (many women who abort are poor, young, or drug users), the value of a human life cannot be measured. Therefore, laws should be passed to outlaw abortion. After all, there are plenty of couples who are willing to adopt an unwanted child.
If we take away the woman’s right to chose, will we begin limiting her other rights also? Or, if we keep abortion legal, are we devaluing human life? There is no easy answer to these questions. Both sides present strong, logical arguments. Though it is a very personal decision, t he fate of abortion rights will have to be left for the Supreme Court to decide.
Second Pattern: Point-by-Point
This second example is also an essay about abortion. We have used the same information and line of reasoning in this essay, however, this one will be presented in the “”Point-by-Point”” style argument. The Point-by-Point style argument presents both sides of the argument at the same time. First, you would present one point on a specific topic, then you would follow that up with the opposing point on the same topic. Again, you are generally not expected to draw any conclusions, simply to fairly present both sides of the argument.
Introduction: (the thesis is underlined)
Explains the argument
The Abortion Issue: Compare and Contrast Point-by-Point Format
Point One: Pro-life and Pro-choice
Supporters of both pro-life and pro-choice refer to religion as support for their side of the argument. Pro-life supporters claim that abortion is murder, and is therefore against God’s will. However, pro-choice defenders argue that abortion is not murder since the fetus is not yet a fully formed human. Therefore, abortion would not be a defiance against God.
Point Two: Pro-life and Pro-choice
Another main point of the argument is over the woman’s personal rights, versus the rights of the unborn child. Pro-choice activists maintain that regardless of the individual circumstances, women should have the right to chose whether or not to abort. The pregnancy and labor will affect only the woman’s body, therefore it should be the woman’s decision. Pro-life supporters, on the other hand, believe that the unborn child has the right to life, and that abortion unlawfully takes away that right.
Tutorial & Instructional Programs
Gallaudet University
202-448-7036
At a Glance
- Quick Facts
- University Leadership
- History & Traditions
- Accreditation
- Consumer Information
- Our 10-Year Vision: The Gallaudet Promise
- Annual Report of Achievements (ARA)
- The Signing Ecosystem
- Not Your Average University
Our Community
- Library & Archives
- Technology Support
- Interpreting Requests
- Ombuds Support
- Health and Wellness Programs
- Profile & Web Edits
Visit Gallaudet
- Explore Our Campus
- Virtual Tour
- Maps & Directions
- Shuttle Bus Schedule
- Kellogg Conference Hotel
- Welcome Center
- National Deaf Life Museum
- Apple Guide Maps
Engage Today
- Work at Gallaudet / Clerc Center
- Social Media Channels
- University Wide Events
- Sponsorship Requests
- Data Requests
- Media Inquiries
- Gallaudet Today Magazine
- Giving at Gallaudet
- Financial Aid
- Registrar’s Office
- Residence Life & Housing
- Safety & Security
- Undergraduate Admissions
- Graduate Admissions
- University Communications
- Clerc Center
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Gallaudet Logo](https://gallaudet.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/footer-logo-gu.png)
Gallaudet University, chartered in 1864, is a private university for deaf and hard of hearing students.
Copyright © 2024 Gallaudet University. All rights reserved.
- Accessibility
- Cookie Consent Notice
- Privacy Policy
- File a Report
800 Florida Avenue NE, Washington, D.C. 20002
Essay Service Examples Social Issues Abortion
Should Abortion be Banned? Essay
Introduction
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay document](https://edubirdie.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/banner/document.png)
Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay reviews](https://edubirdie.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/banner/reviwes.png)
Cite this paper
Related essay topics.
Get your paper done in as fast as 3 hours, 24/7.
Related articles
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Should Abortion be Banned? Essay](https://edubirdie.com/wp-content/cache/thumb/05/b6d741756d3db05_375x435.webp)
Most popular essays
Imagine you’re a 17-year-old girl in Alabama. You had a little mishap and ended up pregnant, but...
The principal point of this paper is to show conversations on premature birth in Islamic morals...
- Women’s Rights
Abortion has always been one of the most controversial and talked about issues, surrounding moral,...
This overall question gives many people hope of what can be, while others consider it a nightmare....
- Christian Worldview
Discussions around abortions in religion give a bold however deep variety of opinions, they all...
- Influence of Christianity
Abortion is arguably one of the most controversial topics in modern society. Although it may seem...
Using Divine Command Theory Metaetchics I will attempt to explain my moral reasoning on Abortion....
As Technology develops, People must make more advanced life choices, which can be difficult. Many...
In today's contemporary world, we are faced with difficulties and decisions that determine our...
Join our 150k of happy users
- Get original paper written according to your instructions
- Save time for what matters most
Fair Use Policy
EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].
We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.
Provide your email, and we'll send you this sample!
By providing your email, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Say goodbye to copy-pasting!
Get custom-crafted papers for you.
Enter your email, and we'll promptly send you the full essay. No need to copy piece by piece. It's in your inbox!
24/7 writing help on your phone
To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Persuasive Essay Why Abortion Should Be Legalized
Save to my list
Remove from my list
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Dr. Top Writer Jr](https://studymoose.com/wp-content/cache/thumb/df/d0669dede2f4bdf_70x70.jpeg)
- News24,(2013). Why abortion should be legal. Retrieved from https://ww.news24.com/MyNews24/Why-abortion-should-be-legal-20131230
- Amnesty International,(2018). Facts on Abortion. Retrieved from www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/sexual-and-reproductive-rights/abortion-facts/
- More than 25 million Abortions are performed every year. Retrieved from www.refinery29.com/en-us/2017/09/174289/unsafe-abortion-statistics-
- Kartha Pollitt, Abortion quotes. Retrieved from www.brainyquote.com/topics/abortion
- Mesce D; Sines E (2006). Washington, D.C., Population Reference Bureau [PRB], 2006. 58 p. Retrieved from https://www.popline.org/node/563328
- https://brightkite.com/essay-on/women-have-the-right-to-abortion
- https://essayforum.com/writing/right-abortion-argumentative-paper-6112/
- https://www.debate.org/opinions/do-women-have-the-right-to-abortion
- https://www.allfamilieshealth.org/abortions/
- https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Women-Have-the-Right-to-Abortion- P3RXPEYTJ
- https://revcom.us/a/1265/what-is-abortion.htm
- https://www.babygaga.com/15-whisper-confessions-of-women-forced-to-have- the-baby-they-didnt-want/
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay photo_author](https://studymoose.com/wp-content/uploads/image-6.png)
Persuasive Essay Why Abortion Should Be Legalized. (2021, Mar 18). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/persuasive-essay-why-abortion-should-be-legalized-essay
"Persuasive Essay Why Abortion Should Be Legalized." StudyMoose , 18 Mar 2021, https://studymoose.com/persuasive-essay-why-abortion-should-be-legalized-essay
StudyMoose. (2021). Persuasive Essay Why Abortion Should Be Legalized . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/persuasive-essay-why-abortion-should-be-legalized-essay [Accessed: 29 Jul. 2024]
"Persuasive Essay Why Abortion Should Be Legalized." StudyMoose, Mar 18, 2021. Accessed July 29, 2024. https://studymoose.com/persuasive-essay-why-abortion-should-be-legalized-essay
"Persuasive Essay Why Abortion Should Be Legalized," StudyMoose , 18-Mar-2021. [Online]. Available: https://studymoose.com/persuasive-essay-why-abortion-should-be-legalized-essay. [Accessed: 29-Jul-2024]
StudyMoose. (2021). Persuasive Essay Why Abortion Should Be Legalized . [Online]. Available at: https://studymoose.com/persuasive-essay-why-abortion-should-be-legalized-essay [Accessed: 29-Jul-2024]
- Should abortion be legalized or permitted or not permitted? Pages: 7 (1962 words)
- Abortion Debate: Should Abortion be Legal Pages: 3 (867 words)
- Why Drugs Such as Marijuana Should Be Legalized Pages: 3 (797 words)
- Why Prostitution Should Be Legalized? Pages: 8 (2151 words)
- Why Same Sex Marriage Should Be Legalized Pages: 5 (1338 words)
- Should Prostitution Be Legalized and Why Pages: 5 (1370 words)
- Reasons to why Euthanasia Should be Legalized Pages: 4 (1071 words)
- A Personal Beliefs on Why Marijuana Should Be Legalized in the United States Pages: 2 (307 words)
- Divorce Should Be Legalized in the Philippines Pages: 10 (2856 words)
- Should Prostitution Be Legalized? Pages: 6 (1774 words)
![Persuasive Essay Why Abortion Should Be Legalized Persuasive Essay Why Abortion Should Be Legalized essay](https://studymoose.com/wp-content/uploads/essay-thumbnails/persuasive-essay-why-abortion-should-be-legalized-post-preview.webp)
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
- Dissertation
- PowerPoint Presentation
- Book Report/Review
- Research Proposal
- Math Problems
- Proofreading
- Movie Review
- Cover Letter Writing
- Personal Statement
- Nursing Paper
- Argumentative Essay
- Research Paper
- Discussion Board Post
Thoughts on writing abortion persuasive essay
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Jason Burrey](https://grademiners.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/shutterstock_1912845274-1-min.jpg)
Abortion is a common term refers to the termination of a pregnancy before it has developed to full term whether spontaneous (miscarriage) or purposely induced. While writing Abortion persuasive essays, therefore, one has to try to convince the target group that it is right to terminate a pregnancy.
In America, abortion is legalized though special legislations governing the subject vary from state to state. The U.S Supreme Court in 1973 decided that legalized the termination of pregnancy if the mother or the parties involved wished to do so. While writing abortion persuasive essays, it is important to put your points articulately so as to connive your audience to your opinion. The following writing tips will come in handy.
Tips to remember
- Thesis Statement: The thesis statement on the essay should be such that at the onset it is appealing, convincing and defendable. The stance was taken, Pro-choice, in this case, should be clear to the reader without leaving him in any doubt whether the writer is pro – life or pro-choice. It should be in black and white as it was that the writer is persuading the reader on abortion.
- Moral and legal issues: The moral and legal issues should be put across such that the reader’s mind is opened on the merits of terminating a pregnancy as opposed to carrying it to term.
- Religious issues: The fact that the Presbyterians and the United Methodists among the Christians are the main proponents of Pro-choice while up to 40% of those who prescribe to the Catholic and the Lutheran faith feel that there is nothing wrong with termination of pregnancies yet their leaders are strictly Pro – life and quite vocal in the condemnation of abortion should be pointers to be used in your persuasion. It all depends on the reason why the termination is desirable.
- The Bible does not consider abortion as a crime. Consider the case in Exodus 21: 20 – 25 on miscarriage versus the death of the mother.
- While raising every issue in support of abortion, do not leave the reader to try and make their own interpretation or decipher what you intended to convey. Every fact should be clear and if possible supported by enough reference in law and daily life that the reader resonates with.
Laying the groundwork
- A case in point is the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) which can be cited in support of abortion and the United General Assembly appreciates that the right to make decisions about ones’ reproductive health and life is a basic human right that is protected by international agreements and women should not be discriminated against.
- Rape cases are on the increase, and incidences of incest are not entirely unheard of in the US in particular and the whole world in general. The agony of carrying a pregnancy resulting from such a heinous act as rape or incest is nothing compared to bringing up a child, a product of rape or incest case. Expound the points while taking care not to lose the readers while being too wordy.
- The sentences used in writing should be short precise and to the point, while using every persuasive technique conceivable to ‘woo’ your readers to your side of the divide.
- Conclusion: the conclusion should summarize whatever you have discussed in your entire essay and give a final verdict on your stand on the issue.
![1 Star 1 Star](https://grademiners.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-postratings/images/stars_flat_png/rating_off.png)
How to Write Abortion Research Paper Homework?
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://grademiners.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/weeewfwe.jpg)
How To Write A Descriptive Essay On Mother?
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://grademiners.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Understanding-Othello-Essay-Topics.jpg)
Othello Essay Topic: Choosing a Perfect One for an Essay
- Projects and Investigations
- Nation / World
- Entertainment
- Newsletters
- Give Feedback
- Connect With Us
- For Subscribers
- Staff Directory
- Contributor Content
My abortion opened my eyes. Here's what I learned after my own experience.
These laws hurt people, and make bad situations worse for families like mine, who are struggling with devastating pregnancy complications..
The adage, “Don’t judge someone until you’ve walked a mile in their shoes,” offers a perspective and reminder that we all need from time to time. As a little girl growing up in a small town in western Wisconsin, I was taught that I can do anything a boy can do. But I didn't understand real strength and grit until I became a mother. I am a resilient individual who isn’t afraid to challenge the status-quo or speak up when something is wrong, so in a time when lawmakers are restricting access to reproductive health care , I am sharing my story.
Last November, a routine 20-week ultrasound scan during a pregnancy revealed dangerously low amniotic fluid. This led to a diagnosis of Bilateral Renal Agenesis, a rare condition that means our baby developed without kidneys or a bladder. Since the baby’s urine is the primary component of amniotic fluid by the 2nd trimester, the lack of fluid is one of many complications that result from the condition. My husband and I met with a maternal-fetal medicine specialist for a clear diagnosis, and were told that our baby would not survive. We educated ourselves about the condition, and carefully evaluated what was best for our family. We faced the harsh reality that we could not save our baby.
My son’s diagnosis consumed my thoughts. We learned that with no amniotic fluid for protection, his bones would bend as they grew from the pressure my own body would put on him. Whenever I leaned over the crib to pick up my daughter, I wondered if I was causing my baby pain. It was unbearable, and I knew I could not spend the next four months carrying a baby I knew would die.
We can’t go back. Being pregnant during an 1800s-era abortion ban was scary.
Out of love for myself, my family, and my baby boy, I chose to end my pregnancy at 23 weeks by induction and natural delivery. We held our son for one hour until he passed away in our arms. But in these moments of pure love and grief, I felt shame and betrayal. I could not understand how my choice was illegal in my home state. I could not understand how our government would restrict a mother's right to do the right thing. So with my eyes wide open, my perspective changed.
Before my pregnancy, I didn't pay close attention to abortion chatter
Prior to this pregnancy, I thought I understood what abortion meant, so I never paid close attention to the political chatter on the topic. With kids and a full-time job, who has the time? Plus, political news these days often sounds like bad reality TV. I would have described myself as a married, working mom, agricultural advocate, and conservative. But now I feel more strongly than ever before that every woman deserves access to abortion care no matter the reason. And as a voting American woman, I feel guilt for being so naïve on this topic before.
Pregnancy can be complicated, and every woman experiences something different. That’s why abortion bans don’t work. Lawmakers can’t just set a deadline for care and cut patients off after a certain number of weeks. These laws hurt people, and make bad situations worse for families like mine, who are struggling with devastating pregnancy complications.
Even if Wisconsin abortion ban overturned, women will face obstacles to care
There are no words to describe the anger I have felt since losing my baby. I can accept the naturally occurring diagnosis. It was entirely out of my control, and I have healed from the experience. What I can’t accept is lawmakers shaming women during their darkest hour. This extremism is dangerous and infuriating. Now more than ever, we must have compassion for others, and work together to support women and families.
I share my story to educate others and combat the stigma around abortion. I know that perspectives can change, and I will continue to talk about what my family went through. We need to move beyond the charged, hyper-partisan language and remember that people should have the freedom to build their families on their own terms.
I had to travel to Minnesota for the health care I needed
What scares me right now is that anti-abortion lawmakers are going far beyond overturning Roe v. Wade, and are working towards a national abortion ban. I was able to cross into Minnesota when I needed care, but if abortion is banned nationwide, women like me will be left with no options. A national abortion ban would feel like calling 911 for help and nobody answers. I think about the future of my two daughters and the devastation they could face if they experience any number of pregnancy complications in their journey to motherhood. We need to do better.
Harris could change so much for better: Yet they call her incompetent.
I wasn’t paying attention to the political discourse around abortion because I didn’t think it affected me. It wasn’t until I had to cross state lines to do what was best for my family that I finally walked to another person’s shoes.
There should be no shame in doing what’s right for your family. We need to trust women and support families. Help me tell our representatives to stay out of our doctor’s offices. Abortion does not discriminate, and no woman should be denied the choice when it comes to her pregnancy. You never know how many rocks are in her shoes.
Megan Kling is a native Wisconsinite and mother of two living in rural Taylor, Wisconsin. Megan currently works as an agronomy sales lead.
Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Abortion — Thesis Statement for Abortion
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay test_template](https://htracer.gradesfixer.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/1px.png)
Thesis Statement for Abortion
- Categories: Abortion Ethics
About this sample
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay close](https://htracer.gradesfixer.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/close-banner.png)
Words: 515 |
Published: Mar 20, 2024
Words: 515 | Page: 1 | 3 min read
Table of contents
The pro-choice perspective, the pro-life perspective, ethical considerations, legal implications.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson](https://gradesfixer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Vector-3-1.png)
Cite this Essay
Let us write you an essay from scratch
- 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
- Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Get high-quality help
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay author](https://htracer.gradesfixer.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Dr.-Heisenberg-150x150.jpg)
Dr. Heisenberg
Verified writer
- Expert in: Social Issues Philosophy
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay writer](https://htracer.gradesfixer.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/2022/07/wr-6-150x150.jpg)
+ 120 experts online
By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
Related Essays
2 pages / 938 words
2 pages / 893 words
2 pages / 963 words
3 pages / 1205 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Still can’t find what you need?
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
Related Essays on Abortion
Abortion is a highly controversial and emotionally charged topic that has been the subject of heated debates for decades. The issue of abortion is deeply personal, touching on fundamental questions of life, morality, and [...]
Satire is a potent tool that can be employed to address sensitive topics, and one such contentious issue is the abortion debate. Abortion, a divisive subject, has fueled passionate arguments for many years. The purpose of this [...]
Abortion is a controversial issue that has remained a topic of heated debate in the United States and other parts of the world. It is a medical procedure that involves terminating a pregnancy before the fetus is viable. While [...]
So, should abortion be legal or illegal? As a college student, I recognize the importance of discussing the contentious issue of abortion and its legality. The complexity of this topic calls for a thoughtful examination of [...]
Abortion can be defined as the deliberate causing of the death of a fetus, either by directly killing it or by causing its expulsion from the womb before it is “viable.” With “the killing of an innocent human being without [...]
To discuss the topic of abortion pros and cons, this essay explores the heated debate surrounding the practice of terminating a pregnancy. Abortion has always been practiced since ancient times, bringing forth the idea of [...]
Related Topics
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
- Instructions Followed To The Letter
- Deadlines Met At Every Stage
- Unique And Plagiarism Free
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris speaks at campaign event in West Allis, Wisconsin](https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/07/2024-07-24T014256Z_1430899271_RC2619ADNP1X_RTRMADP_3_USA-ELECTION-HARRIS-1024x683.jpg)
Colleen Long, Associated Press Colleen Long, Associated Press
Christine Fernando, Associated Press Christine Fernando, Associated Press
Amanda Seitz, Associated Press Amanda Seitz, Associated Press
Leave your feedback
- Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/democrats-hope-harris-bluntness-on-abortion-will-lead-to-2024-wins
Democrats hope Harris’ bluntness on abortion will lead to 2024 wins
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden might not often use the word “abortion” when he talks about the overturning of Roe v. Wade, but Vice President Kamala Harris sure does. She’s also toured a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic where the procedure is performed and routinely links the fall of Roe to the larger issue of rising maternal mortality nationwide.
Now that Harris is running for president in place of Biden, Democrats and advocates for reproductive rights are hoping that her bluntness on abortion — coupled with the administration’s policies — will help sway voters to deliver them not just the White House but key congressional seats as well.
“The president on the record was fabulous and the campaign was turning out multiple repro-focused ads a week, and had an army of surrogates,” said Mini Timmaraju, president of Reproductive Freedom for All. “But, you know, nothing is more compelling than the top of the ticket being the most compelling on the issue, and that’s what we have now.”
In her first rally as a candidate on Tuesday, Harris touched on the issue of abortion briefly. But she’s expected to make it a major feature of the campaign going forward, as she works to draw a stark contrast between herself and Republican Donald Trump.
READ MORE: Republican leaders urge party members against racist and sexist attacks on Harris
She’s eager to portray herself as a direct and consistent advocate with a history of fighting for reproductive health issues, especially Black maternal health.
“We who believe in reproductive freedom will stop Donald Trump’s extreme abortion bans, because we trust women to make decisions about their own bodies and not have their government tell them what to do,” she said to loud cheers at a Wisconsin rally.
The Supreme Court on June 24, 2022, overturned abortion rights that had been in place since 1973. Since then, roughly half the states have put some sort of ban in place.
The consequences of these bans go far beyond restricting access for those who wish to end unwanted pregnancies. And generally, the states with the most restrictions also have the worst rates of maternal mortality.
Trump has repeatedly taken credit for the overturning of the federally guaranteed right to abortion. He nominated three of the Supreme Court justices who voted to overturn Roe. But he has publicly resisted supporting a national abortion ban.
Trump’s running mate, JD Vance, has said he adheres to Trump’s views. But in 2022, when he was running for the Senate in Ohio, Vance said: “I certainly would like abortion to be illegal nationally.”
Dr. Jamila Perritt, leader of the nonpartisan group Physicians for Reproductive Health, laid out a bleak landscape for women today that she hopes will change.
“The destruction of the health care safety net, assaults on bodily autonomy, and the rising maternal mortality rate clearly show us that pregnant people and those with the capacity for pregnancy do not have access to the options they need to stay safe and healthy,” she said, adding that it’s worse for Black women who must navigate racism on top of worsening healthcare.
“We need bold solutions to combat these crises on multiple fronts,” she said.
Even before dropping out of the race, Biden had made Harris his chief messenger on the issue. In the days following the overturning of Roe, the vice president met with lawmakers in conservative states to discuss how to protect abortion rights in the ruling’s aftermath. They convened meetings at the White House. Earlier this year, she did a reproductive rights tour in battleground states, starting in Wisconsin. She was the first vice president to tour an abortion clinic.
Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, has said reproductive freedom is an “everyone” issue, not a “women’s” issue. On Tuesday, in his first public appearance since his wife started pursuing the top slot on the ticket, he visited an abortion clinic.
“We’ve seen the stories of women who had to literally be on death’s door before they got treatment. It’s barbaric, it’s immoral and it must change,” Emhoff said.
The president’s personal views have evolved over his 50 years in public service, but the 81-year-old Catholic has always been more comfortable leaving the blunt talk to his vice president.
On the policy side, Biden has sought to make medication abortion more available, access to contraception easier, and his administration has gone before the Supreme Court to argue hospitals have a duty under federal law to perform the procedure in life-threatening situations even in states where abortion is now banned. Biden also has said the Hyde Amendment should be eliminated. Among other things, the amendment bars the use of federal funds to pay for abortion.
READ MORE: Harris lays out her case against Trump in first campaign event in Wisconsin
But when the president had the opportunity to hit Trump on the issue during their June 27 debate, Biden faltered, giving jumbled and even nonsensical responses, and he failed to check Trump’s false claims about Democrats’ views on the subject. That debate set his undoing in motion.
Harris’ views have been consistent, from her time in the U.S. Senate and as attorney general in California. She links the issue of abortion to the larger problems in the U.S. with maternal mortality and morbidity — plainly discussing how Black women are at a significantly greater risk for complications and less likely to be believed when something goes wrong.
As senator, she advocated for maternal health legislation. In 2019, she sponsored the Maternal CARE Act, calling for grants addressing implicit bias in maternal health care. In 2020, she introduced a law aimed at addressing maternal health outcomes with a focus on Black maternal health. She’s also co-sponsored bills addressing birth control access and funding care for uterine fibroids.
During her time as California’s attorney general, Harris also sued an anti-abortion group that secretly recorded videos of abortion providers.
Mary Ruth Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law, said Harris is poised to become among the most, if not the most, pro-abortion-rights candidates ever nominated by a major political party.
“If Harris prevails, it may have a big impact on how we address abortion rights because it’ll show that a more unapologetic, full-throated embrace of reproductive rights can lead you to win politically and overcome other political obstacles,” said Ziegler, one of the nation’s leading abortion rights scholars.
Renee Bracey Sherman, founder and co-executive director of the national abortion rights organization WeTestify, said Harris’ identity as a Black and South Asian woman uniquely positions her to speak more personally about how abortion bans disproportionately impact women of color. She said it “means something for all of us” when people of color speak thoughtfully and unapologetically.
She added: “I’m looking forward to working with someone who we don’t have to beg to use the word ‘abortion.'”
Support Provided By: Learn more
Educate your inbox
Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else.
Thank you. Please check your inbox to confirm.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/assets/images/placeholder.jpg)
You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay PEN America](https://pen.org/wp-content/themes/pen-usa-custom/images/logo.png)
Argumentative Essay
Jazatte Dalisay is a ninth-grade student at the Manhattan Center for Science and Mathematics. This essay was composed in a class tutored by James Traub, a long-time PEN Member and coordinator of PEN’s Writers in the Schools program.
Women’s rights have greatly evolved throughout the centuries. As of 2014, women in the U.S. are entitled to their right to decide when to have a child. But there is a constant debate on whether or not abortion should remain legal in the United States. The legalization of abortion has not only kept women from danger, but has provided women with a concrete solution to unplanned pregnancies and protects their civil rights. Taking abortion off the shelf of opportunity for women will only make them seek illicit and dangerous methods to abort an unwanted child and takes away the ability of women to decide what to do with their own bodies.
It is understandable why some might think abortion is an inhumane act that is unnecessary and unlawful, especially since there are alternatives. Adoption has been seen as the perfect solution to unplanned pregnancies; women can simply give their unwanted child away to someone who wants it. With adoption, infertile couples get another chance at making a family, and the child still has a chance at life. This would seem to be the most logical, and humane thing to do. So why does abortion exist?
What people who are pro-life fail to see is the psychological and emotional damage that is inflicted on the woman during the pregnancy. If abortion were to be banned, women who have gotten pregnant through rape and/or incest would have to withstand the shame and pain of knowing that an unwanted child is growing inside them. Victims would be forced to have a constant reminder of their rape. A recent study shows that rape victims are 13 times more likely to attempt suicide, and 26 times more likely to abuse substances such as alcohol and drugs (mscu.edu). Banning abortion would mean destroying the chances of women who are victims of rape to get closure. The psychological and emotional stress can fuel their desperation to rid themselves of the fetus and make them go to great lengths to do that. According to Daniel R. Mishell, Jr., MD, Chair of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, “before abortion was legalized women would frequently try to induce abortions by using coat hangers, knitting needles, or radiator flush, or by going to unsafe “back-alley” abortionists.” In the end, banning abortion will not stop women from trying to rid themselves of the fetus, but just put their own well-being in jeopardy.
Abortion is also a concrete solution to unplanned pregnancies. Though the use of contraceptions, such as the morning-after pill, have been proven to work, it is not always as effective. “Fifty-one percent of women who have abortions had used a contraceptive method in the month they got pregnant, most commonly condoms (27 percent) or a hormonal method (17 percent)” (guttmacher.org). Often, women and teenage girls are too afraid to speak up or don’t even know that they are pregnant, and once they realize they are, it’s already too late—contraceptions are not effective after a certain amount of time. Abortion is their last chance of terminating the pregnancy in a safe and legal way.
Lastly, keeping abortion legal protects women’s rights. Women have full control over their bodies, meaning what they do with them is their decision. If abortion were illegal, women would be stripped of this right. According to Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Conner, “The ability of women to participate equally in the economic and social life of the Nation has been facilitated by their ability to control their reproductive lives” (procon.org). Abortion is also viewed as a fundamental right under law. The Constitution gives “a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy,” and that “This right of privacy…is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy” (procon.org). Making abortion illegal means robbing women of their rights.
Keeping abortion legal ensures a woman’s safety when faced with unplanned pregnancies, provides hope for rape victims and helps them in moving on with their lives, and protects women’s rights. Making abortion illegal does not stop women from trying to terminate a pregnancy, nor does it save lives. Rather, it does the opposite — illegalizing abortion puts women in danger and prevents them from having control over their own bodies.
Join PEN America Today
Defend free expression, support persecuted writers, and promote literary culture.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pen.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/PEN-America-Shop-Featured-Image-1.png)
Support for the freedom to read with exclusive designs by Todd Parr, Mike Curato, Art Spiegelman, and more!
Are you an artist at risk or know someone who is?
CONTACT ARC
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pen.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Sepideh-Rashnu-2-Courtesy-Photo-81x81.jpg)
PEN America Speaks: How We Defended And Celebrated Free Expression the Week Of July 22
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pen.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/University-of-Alabama-Featured-Image-81x81.png)
University of Alabama campuses didn’t have to close their DEI offices. They did anyway.
The fighters who narrate: iranian writer sepideh rashnu on the eve of her incarceration.
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay should abortion be banned persuasive essay](https://pen.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/What-Were-Doing-About-Disinformation-in-2024-Featured-Image-81x81.png)
What We’re Doing about Disinformation in 2024
Advertisement
Supported by
JD Vance Stumbles in His Debut, as Democrats Go on Offense
In the 12 days since Ohio’s junior senator was tapped as the future of Donald J. Trump’s movement, old comments and a chorus of derision have blunted any sense of invulnerability.
- Share full article
![should abortion be banned persuasive essay JD Vance speaks and points with his right index finger.](https://static01.nyt.com/images/2024/07/27/multimedia/27pol-vance-rollout-bqcl/27pol-vance-rollout-bqcl-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale)
By Jonathan Weisman and Shane Goldmacher
The choice of Senator JD Vance as former President Donald J. Trump’s running mate reflected the confidence of a campaign so sure of victory in November that it could look beyond a second Trump term to the legacy of his movement.
But in less than two weeks, Mr. Vance has found himself on the defensive, and his struggles have dented the sense of invulnerability that only a week ago seemed to be the overriding image of the Trump campaign.
A stream of years-old quotes, videos and audio comments unearthed by Democrats and the news media in recent days has threatened to undermine the Trump campaign’s outreach to women, voters of color and the very blue-collar voters Mr. Vance, a first-term Ohio senator, was supposed to reach.
His past comments deriding “childless cat ladies,” supporting a “federal response” to stop abortion in Democratic states and promoting a higher tax burden for childless Americans have yielded a chorus of criticism from Democrats. Mr. Vance’s fresh efforts to explain them have provided Democrats more material, with the Harris campaign promoting one short clip in which he seems to suggest that when he spoke of childless cat ladies, he meant no insult to cats — “I’ve got nothing against cats,” he said.
And his first handful of appearances on the stump have drawn unflattering attention. During an appearance in his hometown, Middletown, Ohio, he tried to explain how his critics would call his drinking Diet Mountain Dew racist, with an awkward aside assuring the audience that Diet Mountain Dew was good.
Mr. Vance’s stumbles have come after a remarkable two weeks when Mr. Trump survived an assassination attempt and then rallied the party — and even some skeptics — behind him. The Republican National Convention began with calls for national unity, and though those calls were at times undercut by the Republican presidential nominee, the ticket vaulted out of Milwaukee with a head of steam and an expanded lead in the polls.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Persuasive Essay On Abortion Laws. Abortion laws are a contentious issue, and persuasive arguments often revolve around the balance between individual rights and moral considerations. Advocates for more permissive abortion laws argue that these laws are essential for safeguarding women's health and personal autonomy. Access to safe and legal ...
The Case Against Abortion. Nov. 30, 2021. Crosses representing abortions in Lindale, Tex. Tamir Kalifa for The New York Times. Share full article. 3367. By Ross Douthat. Opinion Columnist. A ...
Fewer adults say abortion should be legal 24 weeks into a pregnancy - about when a healthy fetus could survive outside the womb with medical care. At this stage, 22% of adults say abortion should be legal, while nearly twice as many (43%) say it should be illegal. Again, about one-in-five adults (18%) say whether abortion should be legal at ...
The wider gap has been largely driven by Democrats: Today, 84% of Democrats say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, up from 72% in 2016 and 63% in 2007. Republicans' views have shown far less change over time: Currently, 38% of Republicans say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, nearly identical to the 39% who said this ...
The debate over whether abortion should be a legal option has long divided people around the world. Split into two groups, pro-choice and pro-life, the two sides frequently clash in protests. A June 2, 2022 Gallup poll , 55% of Americans identified as "pro-choice," the highest percentage since 1995. 39% identified as "pro-life," and 5% ...
Paragraph 1: The Right to Bodily Autonomy. One of the main arguments in favor of abortion is the right to bodily autonomy. Every person has the right to make decisions about their own body, and this includes the right to make decisions about their reproductive health. Denying women the right to access abortion services is a violation of their ...
Since the Supreme Court's historic 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, the issue of a woman's right to an abortion has fostered one of the most contentious moral and political debates in America.Opponents of abortion rights argue that life begins at conception - making abortion tantamount to homicide.
May 17, 2022. If Justice Samuel Alito's draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization becomes law, we will enter a post- Roe v. Wade world in which the laws ...
There is a robust international market in misoprostol across the world today—particularly in countries where abortion is strictly banned. 31 Even in Central America, which boasts the world's strictest abortion bans, one in three pregnancies ends in abortion, largely induced by medicines purchased online or on the street. 32 Americans ...
Persuasion and the law. A majority of Americans favor some restrictions on abortion but support Roe v. Wade, according to national polls. But activists dedicated to the goal of ending abortion in ...
Abortion should be illegalized because it is tantamount to murder as it entails the termination of the life of an already living creature. After four weeks of pregnancy, the developing embryo already has a pumping heart, and the appearance of mouth, ears, nose, limbs, and brain follows closely. During that time, there is the possibility of ...
May 19, 2021. For nearly 50 years, public opinion has had only a limited effect on abortion policy. The Roe v. Wade decision, which the Supreme Court issued in 1973, established a constitutional ...
Topic: Why should abortion be banned? Essay hook: Each year, over 40 million new babies are never born because their mothers decide to have an abortion. Thesis statement: Abortions on request should be banned because we cannot decide for the baby whether it should live or die. Body - each paragraph should be devoted to one argument
The argument is a balanced one; for every point supporting abortion there is a counter-point condemning abortion. This essay will delineate the controversy in one type of comparison/contrast essay form: the ""Argument versus Argument,"" or, ""Block-by-Block"" format. In this style of writing, first you present all the arguments ...
In 2021 alone, over 100 anti-abortion bills that restrict or ban abortions were passed in 19 states. This summer, the Supreme Court could deliver a lethal blow to Roe v. Wade.
Abortion should be allowed when the mother's life is in danger. Unsafe abortion is one of the four main causes of maternal mortality, along with bleeding, infections and high blood pressure and it is also the only one that is totally preventable. These four causes are responsible for 75% of maternal deaths worldwide.
The arguments for the persuasive essay on abortion is wrong. You can operate these arguments in a persuasive essay on abortion should be illegal: The medical procedure is a risky one. The possible immediate and long-term consequences are sterility, heavy bleeding, damage of the cervix or womb. Abortion is an irretrievable action so a woman can ...
Debates over abortion touches on different aspects like religious viewpoints, the legality of this procedure, and its morality. And to create a good-quality abortion persuasive essay, you need to know about all key points, rules, and best writing practices. In this article, you will find all information about writing persuasive speeches on ...
All women have the right to be ready to have children, or not! A lot of people refer to abortion as murder, and are against this procedure. But there are alot of reasons why people should support abortion being legalized. No woman has an abortion for fun (Joan Smith, Elizabeth). Abortion is the termination of an unwanted pregnancy (fetus), not ...
Abortion is a common term refers to the termination of a pregnancy before it has developed to full term whether spontaneous (miscarriage) or purposely induced. While writing Abortion persuasive essays, therefore, one has to try to convince the target group that it is right to terminate a pregnancy. In America, abortion is legalized though ...
Essay about Abortion Should Be Banned! Abortion is a legal medical method to stop the premature delivery that is adopted in most countries of the world. It was legalized many years ago but nowadays we live in the civilized society where the human life is the most precious treasure and the question about the appropriateness of abortions is of ...
I was able to cross into Minnesota when I needed care, but if abortion is banned nationwide, women like me will be left with no options. A national abortion ban would feel like calling 911 for ...
Persuasive Essays; Problem Solution Essays; Process Essays; Process Analysis Essays; Profile Essays; ... 'Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned'? ... The Main Reasons Why Abortion is Murder Essay. Abortion is murder. 3000 babies are being killed every single day. In every 1000 women there are 12-13 abortions and there are 4.3 billion ...
Making abortions hard to get will mostly affect poor women, while the societal changes that would help these women to raise their children will not be coming anytime soon. Meanwhile, making sure ...
President Joe Biden might not often use the word "abortion" when he talks about the overturning of Roe v. Wade. But Vice President Kamala Harris sure does.
Argumentative Essay. By: Jazatte Dalisay February 2, 2015. Jazatte Dalisay is a ninth-grade student at the Manhattan Center for Science and Mathematics. This essay was composed in a class tutored by James Traub, a long-time PEN Member and coordinator of PEN's Writers in the Schools program. Women's rights have greatly evolved throughout the ...
Vance's mentor Peter Thiel, who is also well-connected in the New Right world, has expressed similar views about women's suffrage, writing in a 2009 essay, "Since 1920, the vast increase in ...
Ms. Harris supports legislation that would protect the right to abortion nationally, as Roe v. Wade did before it was overturned in 2022, in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
Part of the wish fulfillment of "The West Wing" was that oratory can be persuasive. So Barack Obama could come forth at the Democratic convention next month in Chicago and remind us, once ...
In a 2022 podcast unearthed by CNN and promoted broadly by the Harris campaign, Mr. Vance spoke of a hypothetical situation in which Ohio banned abortion and "every day," George Soros, the ...