How To Write Significance of the Study (With Examples)
![relevance of the study research paper How To Write Significance of the Study (With Examples)](https://filipiknow.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/significance-of-the-study-example-featured-image-1024x576.png)
Whether you’re writing a research paper or thesis, a portion called Significance of the Study ensures your readers understand the impact of your work. Learn how to effectively write this vital part of your research paper or thesis through our detailed steps, guidelines, and examples.
Related: How to Write a Concept Paper for Academic Research
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
Table of Contents
What is the significance of the study.
The Significance of the Study presents the importance of your research. It allows you to prove the study’s impact on your field of research, the new knowledge it contributes, and the people who will benefit from it.
Related: How To Write Scope and Delimitation of a Research Paper (With Examples)
Where Should I Put the Significance of the Study?
The Significance of the Study is part of the first chapter or the Introduction. It comes after the research’s rationale, problem statement, and hypothesis.
Related: How to Make Conceptual Framework (with Examples and Templates)
Why Should I Include the Significance of the Study?
The purpose of the Significance of the Study is to give you space to explain to your readers how exactly your research will be contributing to the literature of the field you are studying 1 . It’s where you explain why your research is worth conducting and its significance to the community, the people, and various institutions.
How To Write Significance of the Study: 5 Steps
Below are the steps and guidelines for writing your research’s Significance of the Study.
1. Use Your Research Problem as a Starting Point
Your problem statement can provide clues to your research study’s outcome and who will benefit from it 2 .
Ask yourself, “How will the answers to my research problem be beneficial?”. In this manner, you will know how valuable it is to conduct your study.
Let’s say your research problem is “What is the level of effectiveness of the lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) in lowering the blood glucose level of Swiss mice (Mus musculus)?”
Discovering a positive correlation between the use of lemongrass and lower blood glucose level may lead to the following results:
- Increased public understanding of the plant’s medical properties;
- Higher appreciation of the importance of lemongrass by the community;
- Adoption of lemongrass tea as a cheap, readily available, and natural remedy to lower their blood glucose level.
Once you’ve zeroed in on the general benefits of your study, it’s time to break it down into specific beneficiaries.
2. State How Your Research Will Contribute to the Existing Literature in the Field
Think of the things that were not explored by previous studies. Then, write how your research tackles those unexplored areas. Through this, you can convince your readers that you are studying something new and adding value to the field.
3. Explain How Your Research Will Benefit Society
In this part, tell how your research will impact society. Think of how the results of your study will change something in your community.
For example, in the study about using lemongrass tea to lower blood glucose levels, you may indicate that through your research, the community will realize the significance of lemongrass and other herbal plants. As a result, the community will be encouraged to promote the cultivation and use of medicinal plants.
4. Mention the Specific Persons or Institutions Who Will Benefit From Your Study
Using the same example above, you may indicate that this research’s results will benefit those seeking an alternative supplement to prevent high blood glucose levels.
5. Indicate How Your Study May Help Future Studies in the Field
You must also specifically indicate how your research will be part of the literature of your field and how it will benefit future researchers. In our example above, you may indicate that through the data and analysis your research will provide, future researchers may explore other capabilities of herbal plants in preventing different diseases.
Tips and Warnings
- Think ahead . By visualizing your study in its complete form, it will be easier for you to connect the dots and identify the beneficiaries of your research.
- Write concisely. Make it straightforward, clear, and easy to understand so that the readers will appreciate the benefits of your research. Avoid making it too long and wordy.
- Go from general to specific . Like an inverted pyramid, you start from above by discussing the general contribution of your study and become more specific as you go along. For instance, if your research is about the effect of remote learning setup on the mental health of college students of a specific university , you may start by discussing the benefits of the research to society, to the educational institution, to the learning facilitators, and finally, to the students.
- Seek help . For example, you may ask your research adviser for insights on how your research may contribute to the existing literature. If you ask the right questions, your research adviser can point you in the right direction.
- Revise, revise, revise. Be ready to apply necessary changes to your research on the fly. Unexpected things require adaptability, whether it’s the respondents or variables involved in your study. There’s always room for improvement, so never assume your work is done until you have reached the finish line.
Significance of the Study Examples
This section presents examples of the Significance of the Study using the steps and guidelines presented above.
Example 1: STEM-Related Research
Research Topic: Level of Effectiveness of the Lemongrass ( Cymbopogon citratus ) Tea in Lowering the Blood Glucose Level of Swiss Mice ( Mus musculus ).
Significance of the Study .
This research will provide new insights into the medicinal benefit of lemongrass ( Cymbopogon citratus ), specifically on its hypoglycemic ability.
Through this research, the community will further realize promoting medicinal plants, especially lemongrass, as a preventive measure against various diseases. People and medical institutions may also consider lemongrass tea as an alternative supplement against hyperglycemia.
Moreover, the analysis presented in this study will convey valuable information for future research exploring the medicinal benefits of lemongrass and other medicinal plants.
Example 2: Business and Management-Related Research
Research Topic: A Comparative Analysis of Traditional and Social Media Marketing of Small Clothing Enterprises.
Significance of the Study:
By comparing the two marketing strategies presented by this research, there will be an expansion on the current understanding of the firms on these marketing strategies in terms of cost, acceptability, and sustainability. This study presents these marketing strategies for small clothing enterprises, giving them insights into which method is more appropriate and valuable for them.
Specifically, this research will benefit start-up clothing enterprises in deciding which marketing strategy they should employ. Long-time clothing enterprises may also consider the result of this research to review their current marketing strategy.
Furthermore, a detailed presentation on the comparison of the marketing strategies involved in this research may serve as a tool for further studies to innovate the current method employed in the clothing Industry.
Example 3: Social Science -Related Research.
Research Topic: Divide Et Impera : An Overview of How the Divide-and-Conquer Strategy Prevailed on Philippine Political History.
Significance of the Study :
Through the comprehensive exploration of this study on Philippine political history, the influence of the Divide et Impera, or political decentralization, on the political discernment across the history of the Philippines will be unraveled, emphasized, and scrutinized. Moreover, this research will elucidate how this principle prevailed until the current political theatre of the Philippines.
In this regard, this study will give awareness to society on how this principle might affect the current political context. Moreover, through the analysis made by this study, political entities and institutions will have a new approach to how to deal with this principle by learning about its influence in the past.
In addition, the overview presented in this research will push for new paradigms, which will be helpful for future discussion of the Divide et Impera principle and may lead to a more in-depth analysis.
Example 4: Humanities-Related Research
Research Topic: Effectiveness of Meditation on Reducing the Anxiety Levels of College Students.
Significance of the Study:
This research will provide new perspectives in approaching anxiety issues of college students through meditation.
Specifically, this research will benefit the following:
Community – this study spreads awareness on recognizing anxiety as a mental health concern and how meditation can be a valuable approach to alleviating it.
Academic Institutions and Administrators – through this research, educational institutions and administrators may promote programs and advocacies regarding meditation to help students deal with their anxiety issues.
Mental health advocates – the result of this research will provide valuable information for the advocates to further their campaign on spreading awareness on dealing with various mental health issues, including anxiety, and how to stop stigmatizing those with mental health disorders.
Parents – this research may convince parents to consider programs involving meditation that may help the students deal with their anxiety issues.
Students will benefit directly from this research as its findings may encourage them to consider meditation to lower anxiety levels.
Future researchers – this study covers information involving meditation as an approach to reducing anxiety levels. Thus, the result of this study can be used for future discussions on the capabilities of meditation in alleviating other mental health concerns.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. what is the difference between the significance of the study and the rationale of the study.
Both aim to justify the conduct of the research. However, the Significance of the Study focuses on the specific benefits of your research in the field, society, and various people and institutions. On the other hand, the Rationale of the Study gives context on why the researcher initiated the conduct of the study.
Let’s take the research about the Effectiveness of Meditation in Reducing Anxiety Levels of College Students as an example. Suppose you are writing about the Significance of the Study. In that case, you must explain how your research will help society, the academic institution, and students deal with anxiety issues through meditation. Meanwhile, for the Rationale of the Study, you may state that due to the prevalence of anxiety attacks among college students, you’ve decided to make it the focal point of your research work.
2. What is the difference between Justification and the Significance of the Study?
In Justification, you express the logical reasoning behind the conduct of the study. On the other hand, the Significance of the Study aims to present to your readers the specific benefits your research will contribute to the field you are studying, community, people, and institutions.
Suppose again that your research is about the Effectiveness of Meditation in Reducing the Anxiety Levels of College Students. Suppose you are writing the Significance of the Study. In that case, you may state that your research will provide new insights and evidence regarding meditation’s ability to reduce college students’ anxiety levels. Meanwhile, you may note in the Justification that studies are saying how people used meditation in dealing with their mental health concerns. You may also indicate how meditation is a feasible approach to managing anxiety using the analysis presented by previous literature.
3. How should I start my research’s Significance of the Study section?
– This research will contribute… – The findings of this research… – This study aims to… – This study will provide… – Through the analysis presented in this study… – This study will benefit…
Moreover, you may start the Significance of the Study by elaborating on the contribution of your research in the field you are studying.
4. What is the difference between the Purpose of the Study and the Significance of the Study?
The Purpose of the Study focuses on why your research was conducted, while the Significance of the Study tells how the results of your research will benefit anyone.
Suppose your research is about the Effectiveness of Lemongrass Tea in Lowering the Blood Glucose Level of Swiss Mice . You may include in your Significance of the Study that the research results will provide new information and analysis on the medical ability of lemongrass to solve hyperglycemia. Meanwhile, you may include in your Purpose of the Study that your research wants to provide a cheaper and natural way to lower blood glucose levels since commercial supplements are expensive.
5. What is the Significance of the Study in Tagalog?
In Filipino research, the Significance of the Study is referred to as Kahalagahan ng Pag-aaral.
- Draft your Significance of the Study. Retrieved 18 April 2021, from http://dissertationedd.usc.edu/draft-your-significance-of-the-study.html
- Regoniel, P. (2015). Two Tips on How to Write the Significance of the Study. Retrieved 18 April 2021, from https://simplyeducate.me/2015/02/09/significance-of-the-study/
Written by Jewel Kyle Fabula
in Career and Education , Juander How
Jewel Kyle Fabula
Jewel Kyle Fabula is a Bachelor of Science in Economics student at the University of the Philippines Diliman. His passion for learning mathematics developed as he competed in some mathematics competitions during his Junior High School years. He loves cats, playing video games, and listening to music.
Browse all articles written by Jewel Kyle Fabula
Copyright Notice
All materials contained on this site are protected by the Republic of the Philippines copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published, or broadcast without the prior written permission of filipiknow.net or in the case of third party materials, the owner of that content. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright, or other notice from copies of the content. Be warned that we have already reported and helped terminate several websites and YouTube channels for blatantly stealing our content. If you wish to use filipiknow.net content for commercial purposes, such as for content syndication, etc., please contact us at legal(at)filipiknow(dot)net
![relevance of the study research paper The Savvy Scientist](https://i0.wp.com/www.thesavvyscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/cropped-Title-header_afterPhD-6.png?fit=1405%2C226&ssl=1)
The Savvy Scientist
Experiences of a London PhD student and beyond
What is the Significance of a Study? Examples and Guide
![relevance of the study research paper Significance of a study graphic, showing a female scientist reading a book](https://i0.wp.com/www.thesavvyscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Significance-of-a-study.png?resize=735%2C400&ssl=1)
If you’re reading this post you’re probably wondering: what is the significance of a study?
No matter where you’re at with a piece of research, it is a good idea to think about the potential significance of your work. And sometimes you’ll have to explicitly write a statement of significance in your papers, it addition to it forming part of your thesis.
In this post I’ll cover what the significance of a study is, how to measure it, how to describe it with examples and add in some of my own experiences having now worked in research for over nine years.
If you’re reading this because you’re writing up your first paper, welcome! You may also like my how-to guide for all aspects of writing your first research paper .
Looking for guidance on writing the statement of significance for a paper or thesis? Click here to skip straight to that section.
What is the Significance of a Study?
For research papers, theses or dissertations it’s common to explicitly write a section describing the significance of the study. We’ll come onto what to include in that section in just a moment.
However the significance of a study can actually refer to several different things.
![relevance of the study research paper Graphic showing the broadening significance of a study going from your study, the wider research field, business opportunities through to society as a whole.](https://i0.wp.com/www.thesavvyscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Your-Study.png?resize=735%2C405&ssl=1)
Working our way from the most technical to the broadest, depending on the context, the significance of a study may refer to:
- Within your study: Statistical significance. Can we trust the findings?
- Wider research field: Research significance. How does your study progress the field?
- Commercial / economic significance: Could there be business opportunities for your findings?
- Societal significance: What impact could your study have on the wider society.
- And probably other domain-specific significance!
We’ll shortly cover each of them in turn, including how they’re measured and some examples for each type of study significance.
But first, let’s touch on why you should consider the significance of your research at an early stage.
Why Care About the Significance of a Study?
No matter what is motivating you to carry out your research, it is sensible to think about the potential significance of your work. In the broadest sense this asks, how does the study contribute to the world?
After all, for many people research is only worth doing if it will result in some expected significance. For the vast majority of us our studies won’t be significant enough to reach the evening news, but most studies will help to enhance knowledge in a particular field and when research has at least some significance it makes for a far more fulfilling longterm pursuit.
Furthermore, a lot of us are carrying out research funded by the public. It therefore makes sense to keep an eye on what benefits the work could bring to the wider community.
Often in research you’ll come to a crossroads where you must decide which path of research to pursue. Thinking about the potential benefits of a strand of research can be useful for deciding how to spend your time, money and resources.
It’s worth noting though, that not all research activities have to work towards obvious significance. This is especially true while you’re a PhD student, where you’re figuring out what you enjoy and may simply be looking for an opportunity to learn a new skill.
However, if you’re trying to decide between two potential projects, it can be useful to weigh up the potential significance of each.
Let’s now dive into the different types of significance, starting with research significance.
Research Significance
What is the research significance of a study.
Unless someone specifies which type of significance they’re referring to, it is fair to assume that they want to know about the research significance of your study.
Research significance describes how your work has contributed to the field, how it could inform future studies and progress research.
Where should I write about my study’s significance in my thesis?
Typically you should write about your study’s significance in the Introduction and Conclusions sections of your thesis.
It’s important to mention it in the Introduction so that the relevance of your work and the potential impact and benefits it could have on the field are immediately apparent. Explaining why your work matters will help to engage readers (and examiners!) early on.
It’s also a good idea to detail the study’s significance in your Conclusions section. This adds weight to your findings and helps explain what your study contributes to the field.
On occasion you may also choose to include a brief description in your Abstract.
What is expected when submitting an article to a journal
It is common for journals to request a statement of significance, although this can sometimes be called other things such as:
- Impact statement
- Significance statement
- Advances in knowledge section
Here is one such example of what is expected:
Impact Statement: An Impact Statement is required for all submissions. Your impact statement will be evaluated by the Editor-in-Chief, Global Editors, and appropriate Associate Editor. For your manuscript to receive full review, the editors must be convinced that it is an important advance in for the field. The Impact Statement is not a restating of the abstract. It should address the following: Why is the work submitted important to the field? How does the work submitted advance the field? What new information does this work impart to the field? How does this new information impact the field? Experimental Biology and Medicine journal, author guidelines
Typically the impact statement will be shorter than the Abstract, around 150 words.
Defining the study’s significance is helpful not just for the impact statement (if the journal asks for one) but also for building a more compelling argument throughout your submission. For instance, usually you’ll start the Discussion section of a paper by highlighting the research significance of your work. You’ll also include a short description in your Abstract too.
How to describe the research significance of a study, with examples
Whether you’re writing a thesis or a journal article, the approach to writing about the significance of a study are broadly the same.
I’d therefore suggest using the questions above as a starting point to base your statements on.
- Why is the work submitted important to the field?
- How does the work submitted advance the field?
- What new information does this work impart to the field?
- How does this new information impact the field?
Answer those questions and you’ll have a much clearer idea of the research significance of your work.
When describing it, try to clearly state what is novel about your study’s contribution to the literature. Then go on to discuss what impact it could have on progressing the field along with recommendations for future work.
Potential sentence starters
If you’re not sure where to start, why not set a 10 minute timer and have a go at trying to finish a few of the following sentences. Not sure on what to put? Have a chat to your supervisor or lab mates and they may be able to suggest some ideas.
- This study is important to the field because…
- These findings advance the field by…
- Our results highlight the importance of…
- Our discoveries impact the field by…
Now you’ve had a go let’s have a look at some real life examples.
Statement of significance examples
A statement of significance / impact:
Impact Statement This review highlights the historical development of the concept of “ideal protein” that began in the 1950s and 1980s for poultry and swine diets, respectively, and the major conceptual deficiencies of the long-standing concept of “ideal protein” in animal nutrition based on recent advances in amino acid (AA) metabolism and functions. Nutritionists should move beyond the “ideal protein” concept to consider optimum ratios and amounts of all proteinogenic AAs in animal foods and, in the case of carnivores, also taurine. This will help formulate effective low-protein diets for livestock, poultry, and fish, while sustaining global animal production. Because they are not only species of agricultural importance, but also useful models to study the biology and diseases of humans as well as companion (e.g. dogs and cats), zoo, and extinct animals in the world, our work applies to a more general readership than the nutritionists and producers of farm animals. Wu G, Li P. The “ideal protein” concept is not ideal in animal nutrition. Experimental Biology and Medicine . 2022;247(13):1191-1201. doi: 10.1177/15353702221082658
And the same type of section but this time called “Advances in knowledge”:
Advances in knowledge: According to the MY-RADs criteria, size measurements of focal lesions in MRI are now of relevance for response assessment in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disorders. Size changes of 1 or 2 mm are frequently observed due to uncertainty of the measurement only, while the actual focal lesion has not undergone any biological change. Size changes of at least 6 mm or more in T 1 weighted or T 2 weighted short tau inversion recovery sequences occur in only 5% or less of cases when the focal lesion has not undergone any biological change. Wennmann M, Grözinger M, Weru V, et al. Test-retest, inter- and intra-rater reproducibility of size measurements of focal bone marrow lesions in MRI in patients with multiple myeloma [published online ahead of print, 2023 Apr 12]. Br J Radiol . 2023;20220745. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220745
Other examples of research significance
Moving beyond the formal statement of significance, here is how you can describe research significance more broadly within your paper.
Describing research impact in an Abstract of a paper:
Three-dimensional visualisation and quantification of the chondrocyte population within articular cartilage can be achieved across a field of view of several millimetres using laboratory-based micro-CT. The ability to map chondrocytes in 3D opens possibilities for research in fields from skeletal development through to medical device design and treatment of cartilage degeneration. Conclusions section of the abstract in my first paper .
In the Discussion section of a paper:
We report for the utility of a standard laboratory micro-CT scanner to visualise and quantify features of the chondrocyte population within intact articular cartilage in 3D. This study represents a complimentary addition to the growing body of evidence supporting the non-destructive imaging of the constituents of articular cartilage. This offers researchers the opportunity to image chondrocyte distributions in 3D without specialised synchrotron equipment, enabling investigations such as chondrocyte morphology across grades of cartilage damage, 3D strain mapping techniques such as digital volume correlation to evaluate mechanical properties in situ , and models for 3D finite element analysis in silico simulations. This enables an objective quantification of chondrocyte distribution and morphology in three dimensions allowing greater insight for investigations into studies of cartilage development, degeneration and repair. One such application of our method, is as a means to provide a 3D pattern in the cartilage which, when combined with digital volume correlation, could determine 3D strain gradient measurements enabling potential treatment and repair of cartilage degeneration. Moreover, the method proposed here will allow evaluation of cartilage implanted with tissue engineered scaffolds designed to promote chondral repair, providing valuable insight into the induced regenerative process. The Discussion section of the paper is laced with references to research significance.
How is longer term research significance measured?
Looking beyond writing impact statements within papers, sometimes you’ll want to quantify the long term research significance of your work. For instance when applying for jobs.
The most obvious measure of a study’s long term research significance is the number of citations it receives from future publications. The thinking is that a study which receives more citations will have had more research impact, and therefore significance , than a study which received less citations. Citations can give a broad indication of how useful the work is to other researchers but citations aren’t really a good measure of significance.
Bear in mind that us researchers can be lazy folks and sometimes are simply looking to cite the first paper which backs up one of our claims. You can find studies which receive a lot of citations simply for packaging up the obvious in a form which can be easily found and referenced, for instance by having a catchy or optimised title.
Likewise, research activity varies wildly between fields. Therefore a certain study may have had a big impact on a particular field but receive a modest number of citations, simply because not many other researchers are working in the field.
Nevertheless, citations are a standard measure of significance and for better or worse it remains impressive for someone to be the first author of a publication receiving lots of citations.
Other measures for the research significance of a study include:
- Accolades: best paper awards at conferences, thesis awards, “most downloaded” titles for articles, press coverage.
- How much follow-on research the study creates. For instance, part of my PhD involved a novel material initially developed by another PhD student in the lab. That PhD student’s research had unlocked lots of potential new studies and now lots of people in the group were using the same material and developing it for different applications. The initial study may not receive a high number of citations yet long term it generated a lot of research activity.
That covers research significance, but you’ll often want to consider other types of significance for your study and we’ll cover those next.
Statistical Significance
What is the statistical significance of a study.
Often as part of a study you’ll carry out statistical tests and then state the statistical significance of your findings: think p-values eg <0.05. It is useful to describe the outcome of these tests within your report or paper, to give a measure of statistical significance.
Effectively you are trying to show whether the performance of your innovation is actually better than a control or baseline and not just chance. Statistical significance deserves a whole other post so I won’t go into a huge amount of depth here.
Things that make publication in The BMJ impossible or unlikely Internal validity/robustness of the study • It had insufficient statistical power, making interpretation difficult; • Lack of statistical power; The British Medical Journal’s guide for authors
Calculating statistical significance isn’t always necessary (or valid) for a study, such as if you have a very small number of samples, but it is a very common requirement for scientific articles.
Writing a journal article? Check the journal’s guide for authors to see what they expect. Generally if you have approximately five or more samples or replicates it makes sense to start thinking about statistical tests. Speak to your supervisor and lab mates for advice, and look at other published articles in your field.
How is statistical significance measured?
Statistical significance is quantified using p-values . Depending on your study design you’ll choose different statistical tests to compute the p-value.
A p-value of 0.05 is a common threshold value. The 0.05 means that there is a 1/20 chance that the difference in performance you’re reporting is just down to random chance.
- p-values above 0.05 mean that the result isn’t statistically significant enough to be trusted: it is too likely that the effect you’re showing is just luck.
- p-values less than or equal to 0.05 mean that the result is statistically significant. In other words: unlikely to just be chance, which is usually considered a good outcome.
Low p-values (eg p = 0.001) mean that it is highly unlikely to be random chance (1/1000 in the case of p = 0.001), therefore more statistically significant.
It is important to clarify that, although low p-values mean that your findings are statistically significant, it doesn’t automatically mean that the result is scientifically important. More on that in the next section on research significance.
How to describe the statistical significance of your study, with examples
In the first paper from my PhD I ran some statistical tests to see if different staining techniques (basically dyes) increased how well you could see cells in cow tissue using micro-CT scanning (a 3D imaging technique).
In your methods section you should mention the statistical tests you conducted and then in the results you will have statements such as:
Between mediums for the two scan protocols C/N [contrast to noise ratio] was greater for EtOH than the PBS in both scanning methods (both p < 0.0001) with mean differences of 1.243 (95% CI [confidence interval] 0.709 to 1.778) for absorption contrast and 6.231 (95% CI 5.772 to 6.690) for propagation contrast. … Two repeat propagation scans were taken of samples from the PTA-stained groups. No difference in mean C/N was found with either medium: PBS had a mean difference of 0.058 ( p = 0.852, 95% CI -0.560 to 0.676), EtOH had a mean difference of 1.183 ( p = 0.112, 95% CI 0.281 to 2.648). From the Results section of my first paper, available here . Square brackets added for this post to aid clarity.
From this text the reader can infer from the first paragraph that there was a statistically significant difference in using EtOH compared to PBS (really small p-value of <0.0001). However, from the second paragraph, the difference between two repeat scans was statistically insignificant for both PBS (p = 0.852) and EtOH (p = 0.112).
By conducting these statistical tests you have then earned your right to make bold statements, such as these from the discussion section:
Propagation phase-contrast increases the contrast of individual chondrocytes [cartilage cells] compared to using absorption contrast. From the Discussion section from the same paper.
Without statistical tests you have no evidence that your results are not just down to random chance.
Beyond describing the statistical significance of a study in the main body text of your work, you can also show it in your figures.
In figures such as bar charts you’ll often see asterisks to represent statistical significance, and “n.s.” to show differences between groups which are not statistically significant. Here is one such figure, with some subplots, from the same paper:
![relevance of the study research paper Figure from a paper showing the statistical significance of a study using asterisks](https://i0.wp.com/www.thesavvyscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/1-s2.0-S1063458419312427-gr3_lrg-scaled.jpg?resize=735%2C457&ssl=1)
In this example an asterisk (*) between two bars represents p < 0.05. Two asterisks (**) represents p < 0.001 and three asterisks (***) represents p < 0.0001. This should always be stated in the caption of your figure since the values that each asterisk refers to can vary.
Now that we know if a study is showing statistically and research significance, let’s zoom out a little and consider the potential for commercial significance.
Commercial and Industrial Significance
What are commercial and industrial significance.
Moving beyond significance in relation to academia, your research may also have commercial or economic significance.
Simply put:
- Commercial significance: could the research be commercialised as a product or service? Perhaps the underlying technology described in your study could be licensed to a company or you could even start your own business using it.
- Industrial significance: more widely than just providing a product which could be sold, does your research provide insights which may affect a whole industry? Such as: revealing insights or issues with current practices, performance gains you don’t want to commercialise (e.g. solar power efficiency), providing suggested frameworks or improvements which could be employed industry-wide.
I’ve grouped these two together because there can certainly be overlap. For instance, perhaps your new technology could be commercialised whilst providing wider improvements for the whole industry.
Commercial and industrial significance are not relevant to most studies, so only write about it if you and your supervisor can think of reasonable routes to your work having an impact in these ways.
How are commercial and industrial significance measured?
Unlike statistical and research significances, the measures of commercial and industrial significance can be much more broad.
Here are some potential measures of significance:
Commercial significance:
- How much value does your technology bring to potential customers or users?
- How big is the potential market and how much revenue could the product potentially generate?
- Is the intellectual property protectable? i.e. patentable, or if not could the novelty be protected with trade secrets: if so publish your method with caution!
- If commercialised, could the product bring employment to a geographical area?
Industrial significance:
What impact could it have on the industry? For instance if you’re revealing an issue with something, such as unintended negative consequences of a drug , what does that mean for the industry and the public? This could be:
- Reduced overhead costs
- Better safety
- Faster production methods
- Improved scaleability
How to describe the commercial and industrial significance of a study, with examples
Commercial significance.
If your technology could be commercially viable, and you’ve got an interest in commercialising it yourself, it is likely that you and your university may not want to immediately publish the study in a journal.
You’ll probably want to consider routes to exploiting the technology and your university may have a “technology transfer” team to help researchers navigate the various options.
However, if instead of publishing a paper you’re submitting a thesis or dissertation then it can be useful to highlight the commercial significance of your work. In this instance you could include statements of commercial significance such as:
The measurement technology described in this study provides state of the art performance and could enable the development of low cost devices for aerospace applications. An example of commercial significance I invented for this post
Industrial significance
First, think about the industrial sectors who could benefit from the developments described in your study.
For example if you’re working to improve battery efficiency it is easy to think of how it could lead to performance gains for certain industries, like personal electronics or electric vehicles. In these instances you can describe the industrial significance relatively easily, based off your findings.
For example:
By utilising abundant materials in the described battery fabrication process we provide a framework for battery manufacturers to reduce dependence on rare earth components. Again, an invented example
For other technologies there may well be industrial applications but they are less immediately obvious and applicable. In these scenarios the best you can do is to simply reframe your research significance statement in terms of potential commercial applications in a broad way.
As a reminder: not all studies should address industrial significance, so don’t try to invent applications just for the sake of it!
Societal Significance
What is the societal significance of a study.
The most broad category of significance is the societal impact which could stem from it.
If you’re working in an applied field it may be quite easy to see a route for your research to impact society. For others, the route to societal significance may be less immediate or clear.
Studies can help with big issues facing society such as:
- Medical applications : vaccines, surgical implants, drugs, improving patient safety. For instance this medical device and drug combination I worked on which has a very direct route to societal significance.
- Political significance : Your research may provide insights which could contribute towards potential changes in policy or better understanding of issues facing society.
- Public health : for instance COVID-19 transmission and related decisions.
- Climate change : mitigation such as more efficient solar panels and lower cost battery solutions, and studying required adaptation efforts and technologies. Also, better understanding around related societal issues, for instance this study on the effects of temperature on hate speech.
How is societal significance measured?
Societal significance at a high level can be quantified by the size of its potential societal effect. Just like a lab risk assessment, you can think of it in terms of probability (or how many people it could help) and impact magnitude.
Societal impact = How many people it could help x the magnitude of the impact
Think about how widely applicable the findings are: for instance does it affect only certain people? Then think about the potential size of the impact: what kind of difference could it make to those people?
Between these two metrics you can get a pretty good overview of the potential societal significance of your research study.
How to describe the societal significance of a study, with examples
Quite often the broad societal significance of your study is what you’re setting the scene for in your Introduction. In addition to describing the existing literature, it is common to for the study’s motivation to touch on its wider impact for society.
For those of us working in healthcare research it is usually pretty easy to see a path towards societal significance.
Our CLOUT model has state-of-the-art performance in mortality prediction, surpassing other competitive NN models and a logistic regression model … Our results show that the risk factors identified by the CLOUT model agree with physicians’ assessment, suggesting that CLOUT could be used in real-world clinicalsettings. Our results strongly support that CLOUT may be a useful tool to generate clinical prediction models, especially among hospitalized and critically ill patient populations. Learning Latent Space Representations to Predict Patient Outcomes: Model Development and Validation
In other domains the societal significance may either take longer or be more indirect, meaning that it can be more difficult to describe the societal impact.
Even so, here are some examples I’ve found from studies in non-healthcare domains:
We examined food waste as an initial investigation and test of this methodology, and there is clear potential for the examination of not only other policy texts related to food waste (e.g., liability protection, tax incentives, etc.; Broad Leib et al., 2020) but related to sustainable fishing (Worm et al., 2006) and energy use (Hawken, 2017). These other areas are of obvious relevance to climate change… AI-Based Text Analysis for Evaluating Food Waste Policies
The continued development of state-of-the art NLP tools tailored to climate policy will allow climate researchers and policy makers to extract meaningful information from this growing body of text, to monitor trends over time and administrative units, and to identify potential policy improvements. BERT Classification of Paris Agreement Climate Action Plans
Top Tips For Identifying & Writing About the Significance of Your Study
- Writing a thesis? Describe the significance of your study in the Introduction and the Conclusion .
- Submitting a paper? Read the journal’s guidelines. If you’re writing a statement of significance for a journal, make sure you read any guidance they give for what they’re expecting.
- Take a step back from your research and consider your study’s main contributions.
- Read previously published studies in your field . Use this for inspiration and ideas on how to describe the significance of your own study
- Discuss the study with your supervisor and potential co-authors or collaborators and brainstorm potential types of significance for it.
Now you’ve finished reading up on the significance of a study you may also like my how-to guide for all aspects of writing your first research paper .
Writing an academic journal paper
I hope that you’ve learned something useful from this article about the significance of a study. If you have any more research-related questions let me know, I’m here to help.
To gain access to my content library you can subscribe below for free:
Share this:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
Related Posts
![relevance of the study research paper Self portrait photo of me thinking about the key lessons from my PhD](https://i0.wp.com/www.thesavvyscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/lessons_cover.jpg?resize=348%2C215&ssl=1)
The Five Most Powerful Lessons I Learned During My PhD
8th August 2024 8th August 2024
![relevance of the study research paper Image with a title showing 'How to make PhD thesis corrections' with a cartoon image of a man writing on a piece of paper, while holding a test tube, with a stack of books on the desk beside him](https://i0.wp.com/www.thesavvyscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/phd_thesis_corrections_cover.png?resize=348%2C215&ssl=1)
Minor Corrections: How To Make Them and Succeed With Your PhD Thesis
2nd June 2024 2nd June 2024
![relevance of the study research paper Graphic of data from experiments written on a notepad with the title "How to manage data"](https://i0.wp.com/www.thesavvyscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/How-to-manage-data.png?resize=348%2C215&ssl=1)
How to Master Data Management in Research
25th April 2024 4th August 2024
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .
Privacy Overview
How To Write a Significance Statement for Your Research
A significance statement is an essential part of a research paper. It explains the importance and relevance of the study to the academic community and the world at large. To write a compelling significance statement, identify the research problem, explain why it is significant, provide evidence of its importance, and highlight its potential impact on future research, policy, or practice. A well-crafted significance statement should effectively communicate the value of the research to readers and help them understand why it matters.
Updated on May 4, 2023
![relevance of the study research paper a life sciences researcher writing a significance statement for her researcher](https://images.prismic.io/aje-cms-production/a7bafa72-f689-42dc-85a9-582a0a9b9d2e_hero-significance-statement.jpg?auto=compress,format&w=60)
A significance statement is a clearly stated, non-technical paragraph that explains why your research matters. It’s central in making the public aware of and gaining support for your research.
Write it in jargon-free language that a reader from any field can understand. Well-crafted, easily readable significance statements can improve your chances for citation and impact and make it easier for readers outside your field to find and understand your work.
Read on for more details on what a significance statement is, how it can enhance the impact of your research, and, of course, how to write one.
What is a significance statement in research?
A significance statement answers the question: How will your research advance scientific knowledge and impact society at large (as well as specific populations)?
You might also see it called a “Significance of the study” statement. Some professional organizations in the STEM sciences and social sciences now recommended that journals in their disciplines make such statements a standard feature of each published article. Funding agencies also consider “significance” a key criterion for their awards.
Read some examples of significance statements from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) here .
Depending upon the specific journal or funding agency’s requirements, your statement may be around 100 words and answer these questions:
1. What’s the purpose of this research?
2. What are its key findings?
3. Why do they matter?
4. Who benefits from the research results?
Readers will want to know: “What is interesting or important about this research?” Keep asking yourself that question.
Where to place the significance statement in your manuscript
Most journals ask you to place the significance statement before or after the abstract, so check with each journal’s guide.
This article is focused on the formal significance statement, even though you’ll naturally highlight your project’s significance elsewhere in your manuscript. (In the introduction, you’ll set out your research aims, and in the conclusion, you’ll explain the potential applications of your research and recommend areas for future research. You’re building an overall case for the value of your work.)
Developing the significance statement
The main steps in planning and developing your statement are to assess the gaps to which your study contributes, and then define your work’s implications and impact.
Identify what gaps your study fills and what it contributes
Your literature review was a big part of how you planned your study. To develop your research aims and objectives, you identified gaps or unanswered questions in the preceding research and designed your study to address them.
Go back to that lit review and look at those gaps again. Review your research proposal to refresh your memory. Ask:
- How have my research findings advanced knowledge or provided notable new insights?
- How has my research helped to prove (or disprove) a hypothesis or answer a research question?
- Why are those results important?
Consider your study’s potential impact at two levels:
- What contribution does my research make to my field?
- How does it specifically contribute to knowledge; that is, who will benefit the most from it?
Define the implications and potential impact
As you make notes, keep the reasons in mind for why you are writing this statement. Whom will it impact, and why?
The first audience for your significance statement will be journal reviewers when you submit your article for publishing. Many journals require one for manuscript submissions. Study the author’s guide of your desired journal to see its criteria ( here’s an example ). Peer reviewers who can clearly understand the value of your research will be more likely to recommend publication.
Second, when you apply for funding, your significance statement will help justify why your research deserves a grant from a funding agency . The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), for example, wants to see that a project will “exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved.” Clear, simple language is always valuable because not all reviewers will be specialists in your field.
Third, this concise statement about your study’s importance can affect how potential readers engage with your work. Science journalists and interested readers can promote and spread your work, enhancing your reputation and influence. Help them understand your work.
You’re now ready to express the importance of your research clearly and concisely. Time to start writing.
How to write a significance statement: Key elements
When drafting your statement, focus on both the content and writing style.
- In terms of content, emphasize the importance, timeliness, and relevance of your research results.
- Write the statement in plain, clear language rather than scientific or technical jargon. Your audience will include not just your fellow scientists but also non-specialists like journalists, funding reviewers, and members of the public.
Follow the process we outline below to build a solid, well-crafted, and informative statement.
Get started
Some suggested opening lines to help you get started might be:
- The implications of this study are…
- Building upon previous contributions, our study moves the field forward because…
- Our study furthers previous understanding about…
Alternatively, you may start with a statement about the phenomenon you’re studying, leading to the problem statement.
Include these components
Next, draft some sentences that include the following elements. A good example, which we’ll use here, is a significance statement by Rogers et al. (2022) published in the Journal of Climate .
1. Briefly situate your research study in its larger context . Start by introducing the topic, leading to a problem statement. Here’s an example:
‘Heatwaves pose a major threat to human health, ecosystems, and human systems.”
2. State the research problem.
“Simultaneous heatwaves affecting multiple regions can exacerbate such threats. For example, multiple food-producing regions simultaneously undergoing heat-related crop damage could drive global food shortages.”
3. Tell what your study does to address it.
“We assess recent changes in the occurrence of simultaneous large heatwaves.”
4. Provide brief but powerful evidence to support the claims your statement is making , Use quantifiable terms rather than vague ones (e.g., instead of “This phenomenon is happening now more than ever,” see below how Rogers et al. (2022) explained it). This evidence intensifies and illustrates the problem more vividly:
“Such simultaneous heatwaves are 7 times more likely now than 40 years ago. They are also hotter and affect a larger area. Their increasing occurrence is mainly driven by warming baseline temperatures due to global heating, but changes in weather patterns contribute to disproportionate increases over parts of Europe, the eastern United States, and Asia.
5. Relate your study’s impact to the broader context , starting with its general significance to society—then, when possible, move to the particular as you name specific applications of your research findings. (Our example lacks this second level of application.)
“Better understanding the drivers of weather pattern changes is therefore important for understanding future concurrent heatwave characteristics and their impacts.”
Refine your English
Don’t understate or overstate your findings – just make clear what your study contributes. When you have all the elements in place, review your draft to simplify and polish your language. Even better, get an expert AJE edit . Be sure to use “plain” language rather than academic jargon.
- Avoid acronyms, scientific jargon, and technical terms
- Use active verbs in your sentence structure rather than passive voice (e.g., instead of “It was found that...”, use “We found...”)
- Make sentence structures short, easy to understand – readable
- Try to address only one idea in each sentence and keep sentences within 25 words (15 words is even better)
- Eliminate nonessential words and phrases (“fluff” and wordiness)
Enhance your significance statement’s impact
Always take time to review your draft multiple times. Make sure that you:
- Keep your language focused
- Provide evidence to support your claims
- Relate the significance to the broader research context in your field
After revising your significance statement, request feedback from a reading mentor about how to make it even clearer. If you’re not a native English speaker, seek help from a native-English-speaking colleague or use an editing service like AJE to make sure your work is at a native level.
Understanding the significance of your study
Your readers may have much less interest than you do in the specific details of your research methods and measures. Many readers will scan your article to learn how your findings might apply to them and their own research.
Different types of significance
Your findings may have different types of significance, relevant to different populations or fields of study for different reasons. You can emphasize your work’s statistical, clinical, or practical significance. Editors or reviewers in the social sciences might also evaluate your work’s social or political significance.
Statistical significance means that the results are unlikely to have occurred randomly. Instead, it implies a true cause-and-effect relationship.
Clinical significance means that your findings are applicable for treating patients and improving quality of life.
Practical significance is when your research outcomes are meaningful to society at large, in the “real world.” Practical significance is usually measured by the study’s effect size . Similarly, evaluators may attribute social or political significance to research that addresses “real and immediate” social problems.
![relevance of the study research paper The AJE Team](https://images.prismic.io/aje-cms-production/7a3dfd43-56b5-4b0e-972f-506f390a1ef2_American_Journal_Experts_author_image.jpg?auto=compress,format&w=48)
The AJE Team
See our "Privacy Policy"
- Link to facebook
- Link to linkedin
- Link to twitter
- Link to youtube
- Writing Tips
How to Discuss the Significance of Your Research
![relevance of the study research paper How to Discuss the Significance of Your Research](https://proofed.com/wp-content/webp-express/webp-images/uploads/2023/04/10-Graphic-How-to-Discuss-the-Significance-of-your-Research-628x492.png.webp)
6-minute read
- 10th April 2023
Introduction
Research papers can be a real headache for college students . As a student, your research needs to be credible enough to support your thesis statement. You must also ensure you’ve discussed the literature review, findings, and results.
However, it’s also important to discuss the significance of your research . Your potential audience will care deeply about this. It will also help you conduct your research. By knowing the impact of your research, you’ll understand what important questions to answer.
If you’d like to know more about the impact of your research, read on! We’ll talk about why it’s important and how to discuss it in your paper.
What Is the Significance of Research?
This is the potential impact of your research on the field of study. It includes contributions from new knowledge from the research and those who would benefit from it. You should present this before conducting research, so you need to be aware of current issues associated with the thesis before discussing the significance of the research.
Why Does the Significance of Research Matter?
Potential readers need to know why your research is worth pursuing. Discussing the significance of research answers the following questions:
● Why should people read your research paper ?
● How will your research contribute to the current knowledge related to your topic?
● What potential impact will it have on the community and professionals in the field?
Not including the significance of research in your paper would be like a knight trying to fight a dragon without weapons.
Where Do I Discuss the Significance of Research in My Paper?
As previously mentioned, the significance of research comes before you conduct it. Therefore, you should discuss the significance of your research in the Introduction section. Your reader should know the problem statement and hypothesis beforehand.
Steps to Discussing the Significance of Your Research
Discussing the significance of research might seem like a loaded question, so we’ve outlined some steps to help you tackle it.
Step 1: The Research Problem
The problem statement can reveal clues about the outcome of your research. Your research should provide answers to the problem, which is beneficial to all those concerned. For example, imagine the problem statement is, “To what extent do elementary and high school teachers believe cyberbullying affects student performance?”
Learning teachers’ opinions on the effects of cyberbullying on student performance could result in the following:
● Increased public awareness of cyberbullying in elementary and high schools
● Teachers’ perceptions of cyberbullying negatively affecting student performance
Find this useful?
Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.
● Whether cyberbullying is more prevalent in elementary or high schools
The research problem will steer your research in the right direction, so it’s best to start with the problem statement.
Step 2: Existing Literature in the Field
Think about current information on your topic, and then find out what information is missing. Are there any areas that haven’t been explored? Your research should add new information to the literature, so be sure to state this in your discussion. You’ll need to know the current literature on your topic anyway, as this is part of your literature review section .
Step 3: Your Research’s Impact on Society
Inform your readers about the impact on society your research could have on it. For example, in the study about teachers’ opinions on cyberbullying, you could mention that your research will educate the community about teachers’ perceptions of cyberbullying as it affects student performance. As a result, the community will know how many teachers believe cyberbullying affects student performance.
You can also mention specific individuals and institutions that would benefit from your study. In the example of cyberbullying, you might indicate that school principals and superintendents would benefit from your research.
Step 4: Future Studies in the Field
Next, discuss how the significance of your research will benefit future studies, which is especially helpful for future researchers in your field. In the example of cyberbullying affecting student performance, your research could provide further opportunities to assess teacher perceptions of cyberbullying and its effects on students from larger populations. This prepares future researchers for data collection and analysis.
Discussing the significance of your research may sound daunting when you haven’t conducted it yet. However, an audience might not read your paper if they don’t know the significance of the research. By focusing on the problem statement and the research benefits to society and future studies, you can convince your audience of the value of your research.
Remember that everything you write doesn’t have to be set in stone. You can go back and tweak the significance of your research after conducting it. At first, you might only include general contributions of your study, but as you research, your contributions will become more specific.
You should have a solid understanding of your topic in general, its associated problems, and the literature review before tackling the significance of your research. However, you’re not trying to prove your thesis statement at this point. The significance of research just convinces the audience that your study is worth reading.
Finally, we always recommend seeking help from your research advisor whenever you’re struggling with ideas. For a more visual idea of how to discuss the significance of your research, we suggest checking out this video .
1. Do I need to do my research before discussing its significance?
No, you’re discussing the significance of your research before you conduct it. However, you should be knowledgeable about your topic and the related literature.
2. Is the significance of research the same as its implications?
No, the research implications are potential questions from your study that justify further exploration, which comes after conducting the research.
3. Discussing the significance of research seems overwhelming. Where should I start?
We recommend the problem statement as a starting point, which reveals clues to the potential outcome of your research.
4. How can I get feedback on my discussion of the significance of my research?
Our proofreading experts can help. They’ll check your writing for grammar, punctuation errors, spelling, and concision. Submit a 500-word document for free today!
Share this article:
Post A New Comment
Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.
5-minute read
Free Email Newsletter Template
Promoting a brand means sharing valuable insights to connect more deeply with your audience, and...
How to Write a Nonprofit Grant Proposal
If you’re seeking funding to support your charitable endeavors as a nonprofit organization, you’ll need...
9-minute read
How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation
Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...
8-minute read
Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement
Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...
7-minute read
Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization
Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...
4-minute read
Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio
Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...
![relevance of the study research paper Logo Harvard University](https://proofed.com/wp-content/webp-express/webp-images/uploads/2020/11/logo-harvard.png.webp)
Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.
- Privacy Policy
![relevance of the study research paper Research Method](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/logo.png)
Home » Background of The Study – Examples and Writing Guide
Background of The Study – Examples and Writing Guide
Table of Contents
![relevance of the study research paper Background of The Study](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Background_of_The_Study-1024x576.jpg)
Background of The Study
Definition:
Background of the study refers to the context, circumstances, and history that led to the research problem or topic being studied. It provides the reader with a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter and the significance of the study.
The background of the study usually includes a discussion of the relevant literature, the gap in knowledge or understanding, and the research questions or hypotheses to be addressed. It also highlights the importance of the research topic and its potential contributions to the field. A well-written background of the study sets the stage for the research and helps the reader to appreciate the need for the study and its potential significance.
How to Write Background of The Study
Here are some steps to help you write the background of the study:
Identify the Research Problem
Start by identifying the research problem you are trying to address. This problem should be significant and relevant to your field of study.
Provide Context
Once you have identified the research problem, provide some context. This could include the historical, social, or political context of the problem.
Review Literature
Conduct a thorough review of the existing literature on the topic. This will help you understand what has been studied and what gaps exist in the current research.
Identify Research Gap
Based on your literature review, identify the gap in knowledge or understanding that your research aims to address. This gap will be the focus of your research question or hypothesis.
State Objectives
Clearly state the objectives of your research . These should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).
Discuss Significance
Explain the significance of your research. This could include its potential impact on theory , practice, policy, or society.
Finally, summarize the key points of the background of the study. This will help the reader understand the research problem, its context, and its significance.
How to Write Background of The Study in Proposal
The background of the study is an essential part of any proposal as it sets the stage for the research project and provides the context and justification for why the research is needed. Here are the steps to write a compelling background of the study in your proposal:
- Identify the problem: Clearly state the research problem or gap in the current knowledge that you intend to address through your research.
- Provide context: Provide a brief overview of the research area and highlight its significance in the field.
- Review literature: Summarize the relevant literature related to the research problem and provide a critical evaluation of the current state of knowledge.
- Identify gaps : Identify the gaps or limitations in the existing literature and explain how your research will contribute to filling these gaps.
- Justify the study : Explain why your research is important and what practical or theoretical contributions it can make to the field.
- Highlight objectives: Clearly state the objectives of the study and how they relate to the research problem.
- Discuss methodology: Provide an overview of the methodology you will use to collect and analyze data, and explain why it is appropriate for the research problem.
- Conclude : Summarize the key points of the background of the study and explain how they support your research proposal.
How to Write Background of The Study In Thesis
The background of the study is a critical component of a thesis as it provides context for the research problem, rationale for conducting the study, and the significance of the research. Here are some steps to help you write a strong background of the study:
- Identify the research problem : Start by identifying the research problem that your thesis is addressing. What is the issue that you are trying to solve or explore? Be specific and concise in your problem statement.
- Review the literature: Conduct a thorough review of the relevant literature on the topic. This should include scholarly articles, books, and other sources that are directly related to your research question.
- I dentify gaps in the literature: After reviewing the literature, identify any gaps in the existing research. What questions remain unanswered? What areas have not been explored? This will help you to establish the need for your research.
- Establish the significance of the research: Clearly state the significance of your research. Why is it important to address this research problem? What are the potential implications of your research? How will it contribute to the field?
- Provide an overview of the research design: Provide an overview of the research design and methodology that you will be using in your study. This should include a brief explanation of the research approach, data collection methods, and data analysis techniques.
- State the research objectives and research questions: Clearly state the research objectives and research questions that your study aims to answer. These should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound.
- Summarize the chapter: Summarize the chapter by highlighting the key points and linking them back to the research problem, significance of the study, and research questions.
How to Write Background of The Study in Research Paper
Here are the steps to write the background of the study in a research paper:
- Identify the research problem: Start by identifying the research problem that your study aims to address. This can be a particular issue, a gap in the literature, or a need for further investigation.
- Conduct a literature review: Conduct a thorough literature review to gather information on the topic, identify existing studies, and understand the current state of research. This will help you identify the gap in the literature that your study aims to fill.
- Explain the significance of the study: Explain why your study is important and why it is necessary. This can include the potential impact on the field, the importance to society, or the need to address a particular issue.
- Provide context: Provide context for the research problem by discussing the broader social, economic, or political context that the study is situated in. This can help the reader understand the relevance of the study and its potential implications.
- State the research questions and objectives: State the research questions and objectives that your study aims to address. This will help the reader understand the scope of the study and its purpose.
- Summarize the methodology : Briefly summarize the methodology you used to conduct the study, including the data collection and analysis methods. This can help the reader understand how the study was conducted and its reliability.
Examples of Background of The Study
Here are some examples of the background of the study:
Problem : The prevalence of obesity among children in the United States has reached alarming levels, with nearly one in five children classified as obese.
Significance : Obesity in childhood is associated with numerous negative health outcomes, including increased risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers.
Gap in knowledge : Despite efforts to address the obesity epidemic, rates continue to rise. There is a need for effective interventions that target the unique needs of children and their families.
Problem : The use of antibiotics in agriculture has contributed to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which poses a significant threat to human health.
Significance : Antibiotic-resistant infections are responsible for thousands of deaths each year and are a major public health concern.
Gap in knowledge: While there is a growing body of research on the use of antibiotics in agriculture, there is still much to be learned about the mechanisms of resistance and the most effective strategies for reducing antibiotic use.
Edxample 3:
Problem : Many low-income communities lack access to healthy food options, leading to high rates of food insecurity and diet-related diseases.
Significance : Poor nutrition is a major contributor to chronic diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
Gap in knowledge : While there have been efforts to address food insecurity, there is a need for more research on the barriers to accessing healthy food in low-income communities and effective strategies for increasing access.
Examples of Background of The Study In Research
Here are some real-life examples of how the background of the study can be written in different fields of study:
Example 1 : “There has been a significant increase in the incidence of diabetes in recent years. This has led to an increased demand for effective diabetes management strategies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new diabetes management program in improving patient outcomes.”
Example 2 : “The use of social media has become increasingly prevalent in modern society. Despite its popularity, little is known about the effects of social media use on mental health. This study aims to investigate the relationship between social media use and mental health in young adults.”
Example 3: “Despite significant advancements in cancer treatment, the survival rate for patients with pancreatic cancer remains low. The purpose of this study is to identify potential biomarkers that can be used to improve early detection and treatment of pancreatic cancer.”
Examples of Background of The Study in Proposal
Here are some real-time examples of the background of the study in a proposal:
Example 1 : The prevalence of mental health issues among university students has been increasing over the past decade. This study aims to investigate the causes and impacts of mental health issues on academic performance and wellbeing.
Example 2 : Climate change is a global issue that has significant implications for agriculture in developing countries. This study aims to examine the adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers to climate change and identify effective strategies to enhance their resilience.
Example 3 : The use of social media in political campaigns has become increasingly common in recent years. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of social media campaigns in mobilizing young voters and influencing their voting behavior.
Example 4 : Employee turnover is a major challenge for organizations, especially in the service sector. This study aims to identify the key factors that influence employee turnover in the hospitality industry and explore effective strategies for reducing turnover rates.
Examples of Background of The Study in Thesis
Here are some real-time examples of the background of the study in the thesis:
Example 1 : “Women’s participation in the workforce has increased significantly over the past few decades. However, women continue to be underrepresented in leadership positions, particularly in male-dominated industries such as technology. This study aims to examine the factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in leadership roles in the technology industry, with a focus on organizational culture and gender bias.”
Example 2 : “Mental health is a critical component of overall health and well-being. Despite increased awareness of the importance of mental health, there are still significant gaps in access to mental health services, particularly in low-income and rural communities. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based mental health intervention in improving mental health outcomes in underserved populations.”
Example 3: “The use of technology in education has become increasingly widespread, with many schools adopting online learning platforms and digital resources. However, there is limited research on the impact of technology on student learning outcomes and engagement. This study aims to explore the relationship between technology use and academic achievement among middle school students, as well as the factors that mediate this relationship.”
Examples of Background of The Study in Research Paper
Here are some examples of how the background of the study can be written in various fields:
Example 1: The prevalence of obesity has been on the rise globally, with the World Health Organization reporting that approximately 650 million adults were obese in 2016. Obesity is a major risk factor for several chronic diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer. In recent years, several interventions have been proposed to address this issue, including lifestyle changes, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery. However, there is a lack of consensus on the most effective intervention for obesity management. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of different interventions for obesity management and identify the most effective one.
Example 2: Antibiotic resistance has become a major public health threat worldwide. Infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria are associated with longer hospital stays, higher healthcare costs, and increased mortality. The inappropriate use of antibiotics is one of the main factors contributing to the development of antibiotic resistance. Despite numerous efforts to promote the rational use of antibiotics, studies have shown that many healthcare providers continue to prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. This study aims to explore the factors influencing healthcare providers’ prescribing behavior and identify strategies to improve antibiotic prescribing practices.
Example 3: Social media has become an integral part of modern communication, with millions of people worldwide using platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Social media has several advantages, including facilitating communication, connecting people, and disseminating information. However, social media use has also been associated with several negative outcomes, including cyberbullying, addiction, and mental health problems. This study aims to investigate the impact of social media use on mental health and identify the factors that mediate this relationship.
Purpose of Background of The Study
The primary purpose of the background of the study is to help the reader understand the rationale for the research by presenting the historical, theoretical, and empirical background of the problem.
More specifically, the background of the study aims to:
- Provide a clear understanding of the research problem and its context.
- Identify the gap in knowledge that the study intends to fill.
- Establish the significance of the research problem and its potential contribution to the field.
- Highlight the key concepts, theories, and research findings related to the problem.
- Provide a rationale for the research questions or hypotheses and the research design.
- Identify the limitations and scope of the study.
When to Write Background of The Study
The background of the study should be written early on in the research process, ideally before the research design is finalized and data collection begins. This allows the researcher to clearly articulate the rationale for the study and establish a strong foundation for the research.
The background of the study typically comes after the introduction but before the literature review section. It should provide an overview of the research problem and its context, and also introduce the key concepts, theories, and research findings related to the problem.
Writing the background of the study early on in the research process also helps to identify potential gaps in knowledge and areas for further investigation, which can guide the development of the research questions or hypotheses and the research design. By establishing the significance of the research problem and its potential contribution to the field, the background of the study can also help to justify the research and secure funding or support from stakeholders.
Advantage of Background of The Study
The background of the study has several advantages, including:
- Provides context: The background of the study provides context for the research problem by highlighting the historical, theoretical, and empirical background of the problem. This allows the reader to understand the research problem in its broader context and appreciate its significance.
- Identifies gaps in knowledge: By reviewing the existing literature related to the research problem, the background of the study can identify gaps in knowledge that the study intends to fill. This helps to establish the novelty and originality of the research and its potential contribution to the field.
- Justifies the research : The background of the study helps to justify the research by demonstrating its significance and potential impact. This can be useful in securing funding or support for the research.
- Guides the research design: The background of the study can guide the development of the research questions or hypotheses and the research design by identifying key concepts, theories, and research findings related to the problem. This ensures that the research is grounded in existing knowledge and is designed to address the research problem effectively.
- Establishes credibility: By demonstrating the researcher’s knowledge of the field and the research problem, the background of the study can establish the researcher’s credibility and expertise, which can enhance the trustworthiness and validity of the research.
Disadvantages of Background of The Study
Some Disadvantages of Background of The Study are as follows:
- Time-consuming : Writing a comprehensive background of the study can be time-consuming, especially if the research problem is complex and multifaceted. This can delay the research process and impact the timeline for completing the study.
- Repetitive: The background of the study can sometimes be repetitive, as it often involves summarizing existing research and theories related to the research problem. This can be tedious for the reader and may make the section less engaging.
- Limitations of existing research: The background of the study can reveal the limitations of existing research related to the problem. This can create challenges for the researcher in developing research questions or hypotheses that address the gaps in knowledge identified in the background of the study.
- Bias : The researcher’s biases and perspectives can influence the content and tone of the background of the study. This can impact the reader’s perception of the research problem and may influence the validity of the research.
- Accessibility: Accessing and reviewing the literature related to the research problem can be challenging, especially if the researcher does not have access to a comprehensive database or if the literature is not available in the researcher’s language. This can limit the depth and scope of the background of the study.
About the author
Muhammad Hassan
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
You may also like
![relevance of the study research paper Problem statement](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/problem_statement-145x100.png)
Problem Statement – Writing Guide, Examples and...
![relevance of the study research paper Theoretical Framework](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Theoretical_Framework-145x100.png)
Theoretical Framework – Types, Examples and...
![relevance of the study research paper Scope of the Research](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Scope_of_the_Research-145x100.png)
Scope of the Research – Writing Guide and...
![relevance of the study research paper Implications in Research](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Implications_in_Research-145x100.png)
Implications in Research – Types, Examples and...
![relevance of the study research paper Purpose of Research](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Purpose_of_Research-145x100.png)
Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications
![relevance of the study research paper Research Techniques](https://researchmethod.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Research_Techniques-145x100.png)
Research Techniques – Methods, Types and Examples
![relevance of the study research paper relevance of the study research paper](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/cropped-DiscoverPhDs-Logo-Light-v1-2.png)
Community Blog
Keep up-to-date on postgraduate related issues with our quick reads written by students, postdocs, professors and industry leaders.
What is the Significance of the Study?
![relevance of the study research paper Picture of DiscoverPhDs](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/DiscoverPhDs_Profile-Icon.png)
- By DiscoverPhDs
- August 25, 2020
![Significance of the Study Significance of the Study](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/elementor/thumbs/Untitled-design-3-phula6nxmlsdokreouhf69he2qj0fn026bzz0nbvyg.jpg)
- what the significance of the study means,
- why it’s important to include in your research work,
- where you would include it in your paper, thesis or dissertation,
- how you write one
- and finally an example of a well written section about the significance of the study.
What does Significance of the Study mean?
The significance of the study is a written statement that explains why your research was needed. It’s a justification of the importance of your work and impact it has on your research field, it’s contribution to new knowledge and how others will benefit from it.
Why is the Significance of the Study important?
The significance of the study, also known as the rationale of the study, is important to convey to the reader why the research work was important. This may be an academic reviewer assessing your manuscript under peer-review, an examiner reading your PhD thesis, a funder reading your grant application or another research group reading your published journal paper. Your academic writing should make clear to the reader what the significance of the research that you performed was, the contribution you made and the benefits of it.
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
How do you write the Significance of the Study?
When writing this section, first think about where the gaps in knowledge are in your research field. What are the areas that are poorly understood with little or no previously published literature? Or what topics have others previously published on that still require further work. This is often referred to as the problem statement.
The introduction section within the significance of the study should include you writing the problem statement and explaining to the reader where the gap in literature is.
Then think about the significance of your research and thesis study from two perspectives: (1) what is the general contribution of your research on your field and (2) what specific contribution have you made to the knowledge and who does this benefit the most.
For example, the gap in knowledge may be that the benefits of dumbbell exercises for patients recovering from a broken arm are not fully understood. You may have performed a study investigating the impact of dumbbell training in patients with fractures versus those that did not perform dumbbell exercises and shown there to be a benefit in their use. The broad significance of the study would be the improvement in the understanding of effective physiotherapy methods. Your specific contribution has been to show a significant improvement in the rate of recovery in patients with broken arms when performing certain dumbbell exercise routines.
This statement should be no more than 500 words in length when written for a thesis. Within a research paper, the statement should be shorter and around 200 words at most.
Significance of the Study: An example
Building on the above hypothetical academic study, the following is an example of a full statement of the significance of the study for you to consider when writing your own. Keep in mind though that there’s no single way of writing the perfect significance statement and it may well depend on the subject area and the study content.
Here’s another example to help demonstrate how a significance of the study can also be applied to non-technical fields:
The significance of this research lies in its potential to inform clinical practices and patient counseling. By understanding the psychological outcomes associated with non-surgical facial aesthetics, practitioners can better guide their patients in making informed decisions about their treatment plans. Additionally, this study contributes to the body of academic knowledge by providing empirical evidence on the effects of these cosmetic procedures, which have been largely anecdotal up to this point.
The statement of the significance of the study is used by students and researchers in academic writing to convey the importance of the research performed; this section is written at the end of the introduction and should describe the specific contribution made and who it benefits.
![relevance of the study research paper DiscoverPhDs_Annotated_Bibliography_Literature_Review](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/DiscoverPhDs_Annotated_Bibliography_Literature_Review-300x200.jpg)
Find out the differences between a Literature Review and an Annotated Bibliography, whey they should be used and how to write them.
![relevance of the study research paper A Guide to Your First Week as a PhD Student](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/A-guide-to-your-first-week-as-a-PhD-student-300x168.jpg)
How should you spend your first week as a PhD student? Here’s are 7 steps to help you get started on your journey.
![relevance of the study research paper Significance of the Study](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Untitled-design-3-300x169.jpg)
In this post you’ll learn what the significance of the study means, why it’s important, where and how to write one in your paper or thesis with an example.
Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.
![relevance of the study research paper](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/DiscoverPhDs_Biology-PhD-Degrees-e1645021467458.webp)
Browse PhDs Now
![relevance of the study research paper PhD_Synopsis_Format_Guidance](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/PhD_Synopsis_Format-300x200.jpg)
This article will answer common questions about the PhD synopsis, give guidance on how to write one, and provide my thoughts on samples.
![relevance of the study research paper New PhD Student](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/New-PhD-Student-300x127.jpg)
Starting your PhD can feel like a daunting, exciting and special time. They’ll be so much to think about – here are a few tips to help you get started.
![relevance of the study research paper relevance of the study research paper](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Jerelle-Joseph_Graduation-300x300.jpg)
Dr Joseph gained her PhD in Chemistry from the University of Cambridge in 2018 and is now a Postdoctoral Research Associate in Physics at the University. Her research is on better understanding how cells organises its contents via the process of liquid-liquid phase separation.
![relevance of the study research paper Danny Ward Profile](https://www.discoverphds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2-Danny-Ward-e1592759479771-300x300.jpg)
Danny is a third year PhD student at the John Innes Centre and the University of East Anglia, working with Pseudomonas bacteria to understand how they infect their hosts.
Join Thousands of Students
- Resources Home 🏠
- Try SciSpace Copilot
- Search research papers
- Add Copilot Extension
- Try AI Detector
- Try Paraphraser
- Try Citation Generator
- April Papers
- June Papers
- July Papers
![relevance of the study research paper SciSpace Resources](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/2023/01/Scispace--600---72-px---1-.png)
How to Write an Effective Background of the Study: A Comprehensive Guide
![relevance of the study research paper Madalsa](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/2023/08/Screenshot-2023-08-04-at-6.27.08-PM.png)
Table of Contents
The background of the study in a research paper offers a clear context, highlighting why the research is essential and the problem it aims to address.
As a researcher, this foundational section is essential for you to chart the course of your study, Moreover, it allows readers to understand the importance and path of your research.
Whether in academic communities or to the general public, a well-articulated background aids in communicating the essence of the research effectively.
While it may seem straightforward, crafting an effective background requires a blend of clarity, precision, and relevance. Therefore, this article aims to be your guide, offering insights into:
- Understanding the concept of the background of the study.
- Learning how to craft a compelling background effectively.
- Identifying and sidestepping common pitfalls in writing the background.
- Exploring practical examples that bring the theory to life.
- Enhancing both your writing and reading of academic papers.
Keeping these compelling insights in mind, let's delve deeper into the details of the empirical background of the study, exploring its definition, distinctions, and the art of writing it effectively.
What is the background of the study?
The background of the study is placed at the beginning of a research paper. It provides the context, circumstances, and history that led to the research problem or topic being explored.
It offers readers a snapshot of the existing knowledge on the topic and the reasons that spurred your current research.
When crafting the background of your study, consider the following questions.
- What's the context of your research?
- Which previous research will you refer to?
- Are there any knowledge gaps in the existing relevant literature?
- How will you justify the need for your current research?
- Have you concisely presented the research question or problem?
In a typical research paper structure, after presenting the background, the introduction section follows. The introduction delves deeper into the specific objectives of the research and often outlines the structure or main points that the paper will cover.
Together, they create a cohesive starting point, ensuring readers are well-equipped to understand the subsequent sections of the research paper.
While the background of the study and the introduction section of the research manuscript may seem similar and sometimes even overlap, each serves a unique purpose in the research narrative.
Difference between background and introduction
A well-written background of the study and introduction are preliminary sections of a research paper and serve distinct purposes.
Here’s a detailed tabular comparison between the two of them.
Aspect | Background | Introduction |
Primary purpose | Provides context and logical reasons for the research, explaining why the study is necessary. | Entails the broader scope of the research, hinting at its objectives and significance. |
Depth of information | It delves into the existing literature, highlighting gaps or unresolved questions that the research aims to address. | It offers a general overview, touching upon the research topic without going into extensive detail. |
Content focus | The focus is on historical context, previous studies, and the evolution of the research topic. | The focus is on the broader research field, potential implications, and a preview of the research structure. |
Position in a research paper | Typically comes at the very beginning, setting the stage for the research. | Follows the background, leading readers into the main body of the research. |
Tone | Analytical, detailing the topic and its significance. | General and anticipatory, preparing readers for the depth and direction of the focus of the study. |
What is the relevance of the background of the study?
It is necessary for you to provide your readers with the background of your research. Without this, readers may grapple with questions such as: Why was this specific research topic chosen? What led to this decision? Why is this study relevant? Is it worth their time?
Such uncertainties can deter them from fully engaging with your study, leading to the rejection of your research paper. Additionally, this can diminish its impact in the academic community, and reduce its potential for real-world application or policy influence .
To address these concerns and offer clarity, the background section plays a pivotal role in research papers.
The background of the study in research is important as it:
- Provides context: It offers readers a clear picture of the existing knowledge, helping them understand where the current research fits in.
- Highlights relevance: By detailing the reasons for the research, it underscores the study's significance and its potential impact.
- Guides the narrative: The background shapes the narrative flow of the paper, ensuring a logical progression from what's known to what the research aims to uncover.
- Enhances engagement: A well-crafted background piques the reader's interest, encouraging them to delve deeper into the research paper.
- Aids in comprehension: By setting the scenario, it aids readers in better grasping the research objectives, methodologies, and findings.
How to write the background of the study in a research paper?
The journey of presenting a compelling argument begins with the background study. This section holds the power to either captivate or lose the reader's interest.
An effectively written background not only provides context but also sets the tone for the entire research paper. It's the bridge that connects a broad topic to a specific research question, guiding readers through the logic behind the study.
But how does one craft a background of the study that resonates, informs, and engages?
Here, we’ll discuss how to write an impactful background study, ensuring your research stands out and captures the attention it deserves.
Identify the research problem
The first step is to start pinpointing the specific issue or gap you're addressing. This should be a significant and relevant problem in your field.
A well-defined problem is specific, relevant, and significant to your field. It should resonate with both experts and readers.
Here’s more on how to write an effective research problem .
Provide context
Here, you need to provide a broader perspective, illustrating how your research aligns with or contributes to the overarching context or the wider field of study. A comprehensive context is grounded in facts, offers multiple perspectives, and is relatable.
In addition to stating facts, you should weave a story that connects key concepts from the past, present, and potential future research. For instance, consider the following approach.
- Offer a brief history of the topic, highlighting major milestones or turning points that have shaped the current landscape.
- Discuss contemporary developments or current trends that provide relevant information to your research problem. This could include technological advancements, policy changes, or shifts in societal attitudes.
- Highlight the views of different stakeholders. For a topic like sustainable agriculture, this could mean discussing the perspectives of farmers, environmentalists, policymakers, and consumers.
- If relevant, compare and contrast global trends with local conditions and circumstances. This can offer readers a more holistic understanding of the topic.
Literature review
For this step, you’ll deep dive into the existing literature on the same topic. It's where you explore what scholars, researchers, and experts have already discovered or discussed about your topic.
Conducting a thorough literature review isn't just a recap of past works. To elevate its efficacy, it's essential to analyze the methods, outcomes, and intricacies of prior research work, demonstrating a thorough engagement with the existing body of knowledge.
- Instead of merely listing past research study, delve into their methodologies, findings, and limitations. Highlight groundbreaking studies and those that had contrasting results.
- Try to identify patterns. Look for recurring themes or trends in the literature. Are there common conclusions or contentious points?
- The next step would be to connect the dots. Show how different pieces of research relate to each other. This can help in understanding the evolution of thought on the topic.
By showcasing what's already known, you can better highlight the background of the study in research.
Highlight the research gap
This step involves identifying the unexplored areas or unanswered questions in the existing literature. Your research seeks to address these gaps, providing new insights or answers.
A clear research gap shows you've thoroughly engaged with existing literature and found an area that needs further exploration.
How can you efficiently highlight the research gap?
- Find the overlooked areas. Point out topics or angles that haven't been adequately addressed.
- Highlight questions that have emerged due to recent developments or changing circumstances.
- Identify areas where insights from other fields might be beneficial but haven't been explored yet.
State your objectives
Here, it’s all about laying out your game plan — What do you hope to achieve with your research? You need to mention a clear objective that’s specific, actionable, and directly tied to the research gap.
How to state your objectives?
- List the primary questions guiding your research.
- If applicable, state any hypotheses or predictions you aim to test.
- Specify what you hope to achieve, whether it's new insights, solutions, or methodologies.
Discuss the significance
This step describes your 'why'. Why is your research important? What broader implications does it have?
The significance of “why” should be both theoretical (adding to the existing literature) and practical (having real-world implications).
How do we effectively discuss the significance?
- Discuss how your research adds to the existing body of knowledge.
- Highlight how your findings could be applied in real-world scenarios, from policy changes to on-ground practices.
- Point out how your research could pave the way for further studies or open up new areas of exploration.
Summarize your points
A concise summary acts as a bridge, smoothly transitioning readers from the background to the main body of the paper. This step is a brief recap, ensuring that readers have grasped the foundational concepts.
How to summarize your study?
- Revisit the key points discussed, from the research problem to its significance.
- Prepare the reader for the subsequent sections, ensuring they understand the research's direction.
Include examples for better understanding
Research and come up with real-world or hypothetical examples to clarify complex concepts or to illustrate the practical applications of your research. Relevant examples make abstract ideas tangible, aiding comprehension.
How to include an effective example of the background of the study?
- Use past events or scenarios to explain concepts.
- Craft potential scenarios to demonstrate the implications of your findings.
- Use comparisons to simplify complex ideas, making them more relatable.
Crafting a compelling background of the study in research is about striking the right balance between providing essential context, showcasing your comprehensive understanding of the existing literature, and highlighting the unique value of your research .
While writing the background of the study, keep your readers at the forefront of your mind. Every piece of information, every example, and every objective should be geared toward helping them understand and appreciate your research.
How to avoid mistakes in the background of the study in research?
To write a well-crafted background of the study, you should be aware of the following potential research pitfalls .
- Stay away from ambiguity. Always assume that your reader might not be familiar with intricate details about your topic.
- Avoid discussing unrelated themes. Stick to what's directly relevant to your research problem.
- Ensure your background is well-organized. Information should flow logically, making it easy for readers to follow.
- While it's vital to provide context, avoid overwhelming the reader with excessive details that might not be directly relevant to your research problem.
- Ensure you've covered the most significant and relevant studies i` n your field. Overlooking key pieces of literature can make your background seem incomplete.
- Aim for a balanced presentation of facts, and avoid showing overt bias or presenting only one side of an argument.
- While academic paper often involves specialized terms, ensure they're adequately explained or use simpler alternatives when possible.
- Every claim or piece of information taken from existing literature should be appropriately cited. Failing to do so can lead to issues of plagiarism.
- Avoid making the background too lengthy. While thoroughness is appreciated, it should not come at the expense of losing the reader's interest. Maybe prefer to keep it to one-two paragraphs long.
- Especially in rapidly evolving fields, it's crucial to ensure that your literature review section is up-to-date and includes the latest research.
Example of an effective background of the study
Let's consider a topic: "The Impact of Online Learning on Student Performance." The ideal background of the study section for this topic would be as follows.
In the last decade, the rise of the internet has revolutionized many sectors, including education. Online learning platforms, once a supplementary educational tool, have now become a primary mode of instruction for many institutions worldwide. With the recent global events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a rapid shift from traditional classroom learning to online modes, making it imperative to understand its effects on student performance.
Previous studies have explored various facets of online learning, from its accessibility to its flexibility. However, there is a growing need to assess its direct impact on student outcomes. While some educators advocate for its benefits, citing the convenience and vast resources available, others express concerns about potential drawbacks, such as reduced student engagement and the challenges of self-discipline.
This research aims to delve deeper into this debate, evaluating the true impact of online learning on student performance.
Why is this example considered as an effective background section of a research paper?
This background section example effectively sets the context by highlighting the rise of online learning and its increased relevance due to recent global events. It references prior research on the topic, indicating a foundation built on existing knowledge.
By presenting both the potential advantages and concerns of online learning, it establishes a balanced view, leading to the clear purpose of the study: to evaluate the true impact of online learning on student performance.
As we've explored, writing an effective background of the study in research requires clarity, precision, and a keen understanding of both the broader landscape and the specific details of your topic.
From identifying the research problem, providing context, reviewing existing literature to highlighting research gaps and stating objectives, each step is pivotal in shaping the narrative of your research. And while there are best practices to follow, it's equally crucial to be aware of the pitfalls to avoid.
Remember, writing or refining the background of your study is essential to engage your readers, familiarize them with the research context, and set the ground for the insights your research project will unveil.
Drawing from all the important details, insights and guidance shared, you're now in a strong position to craft a background of the study that not only informs but also engages and resonates with your readers.
Now that you've a clear understanding of what the background of the study aims to achieve, the natural progression is to delve into the next crucial component — write an effective introduction section of a research paper. Read here .
Frequently Asked Questions
The background of the study should include a clear context for the research, references to relevant previous studies, identification of knowledge gaps, justification for the current research, a concise overview of the research problem or question, and an indication of the study's significance or potential impact.
The background of the study is written to provide readers with a clear understanding of the context, significance, and rationale behind the research. It offers a snapshot of existing knowledge on the topic, highlights the relevance of the study, and sets the stage for the research questions and objectives. It ensures that readers can grasp the importance of the research and its place within the broader field of study.
The background of the study is a section in a research paper that provides context, circumstances, and history leading to the research problem or topic being explored. It presents existing knowledge on the topic and outlines the reasons that spurred the current research, helping readers understand the research's foundation and its significance in the broader academic landscape.
The number of paragraphs in the background of the study can vary based on the complexity of the topic and the depth of the context required. Typically, it might range from 3 to 5 paragraphs, but in more detailed or complex research papers, it could be longer. The key is to ensure that all relevant information is presented clearly and concisely, without unnecessary repetition.
![relevance of the study research paper relevance of the study research paper](https://typeset.io/resources/assets/icon-192x192.png?v=af7ef697bc)
You might also like
![relevance of the study research paper This ChatGPT Alternative Will Change How You Read PDFs Forever!](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/size/w1000/2024/09/Scispace-vs-ChatGPT.png)
This ChatGPT Alternative Will Change How You Read PDFs Forever!
Smallpdf vs SciSpace: Which ChatPDF is Right for You?
![relevance of the study research paper Adobe PDF Reader vs. SciSpace ChatPDF — Best Chat PDF Tools](https://typeset.io/resources/content/images/size/w1000/2024/08/SciSpace-vs-Adobe-PDF-Reader.png)
Adobe PDF Reader vs. SciSpace ChatPDF — Best Chat PDF Tools
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Research paper
Writing a Research Paper Introduction | Step-by-Step Guide
Published on September 24, 2022 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on March 27, 2023.
![relevance of the study research paper Writing a Research Paper Introduction](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Writing-a-research-paper-introduction-preview.webp)
The introduction to a research paper is where you set up your topic and approach for the reader. It has several key goals:
- Present your topic and get the reader interested
- Provide background or summarize existing research
- Position your own approach
- Detail your specific research problem and problem statement
- Give an overview of the paper’s structure
The introduction looks slightly different depending on whether your paper presents the results of original empirical research or constructs an argument by engaging with a variety of sources.
Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text
Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes
![relevance of the study research paper upload-your-document-ai-proofreader](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/grammar-check.webp)
Table of contents
Step 1: introduce your topic, step 2: describe the background, step 3: establish your research problem, step 4: specify your objective(s), step 5: map out your paper, research paper introduction examples, frequently asked questions about the research paper introduction.
The first job of the introduction is to tell the reader what your topic is and why it’s interesting or important. This is generally accomplished with a strong opening hook.
The hook is a striking opening sentence that clearly conveys the relevance of your topic. Think of an interesting fact or statistic, a strong statement, a question, or a brief anecdote that will get the reader wondering about your topic.
For example, the following could be an effective hook for an argumentative paper about the environmental impact of cattle farming:
A more empirical paper investigating the relationship of Instagram use with body image issues in adolescent girls might use the following hook:
Don’t feel that your hook necessarily has to be deeply impressive or creative. Clarity and relevance are still more important than catchiness. The key thing is to guide the reader into your topic and situate your ideas.
Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.
This part of the introduction differs depending on what approach your paper is taking.
In a more argumentative paper, you’ll explore some general background here. In a more empirical paper, this is the place to review previous research and establish how yours fits in.
Argumentative paper: Background information
After you’ve caught your reader’s attention, specify a bit more, providing context and narrowing down your topic.
Provide only the most relevant background information. The introduction isn’t the place to get too in-depth; if more background is essential to your paper, it can appear in the body .
Empirical paper: Describing previous research
For a paper describing original research, you’ll instead provide an overview of the most relevant research that has already been conducted. This is a sort of miniature literature review —a sketch of the current state of research into your topic, boiled down to a few sentences.
This should be informed by genuine engagement with the literature. Your search can be less extensive than in a full literature review, but a clear sense of the relevant research is crucial to inform your own work.
Begin by establishing the kinds of research that have been done, and end with limitations or gaps in the research that you intend to respond to.
The next step is to clarify how your own research fits in and what problem it addresses.
Argumentative paper: Emphasize importance
In an argumentative research paper, you can simply state the problem you intend to discuss, and what is original or important about your argument.
Empirical paper: Relate to the literature
In an empirical research paper, try to lead into the problem on the basis of your discussion of the literature. Think in terms of these questions:
- What research gap is your work intended to fill?
- What limitations in previous work does it address?
- What contribution to knowledge does it make?
You can make the connection between your problem and the existing research using phrases like the following.
Although has been studied in detail, insufficient attention has been paid to . | You will address a previously overlooked aspect of your topic. |
The implications of study deserve to be explored further. | You will build on something suggested by a previous study, exploring it in greater depth. |
It is generally assumed that . However, this paper suggests that … | You will depart from the consensus on your topic, establishing a new position. |
Now you’ll get into the specifics of what you intend to find out or express in your research paper.
The way you frame your research objectives varies. An argumentative paper presents a thesis statement, while an empirical paper generally poses a research question (sometimes with a hypothesis as to the answer).
Argumentative paper: Thesis statement
The thesis statement expresses the position that the rest of the paper will present evidence and arguments for. It can be presented in one or two sentences, and should state your position clearly and directly, without providing specific arguments for it at this point.
Empirical paper: Research question and hypothesis
The research question is the question you want to answer in an empirical research paper.
Present your research question clearly and directly, with a minimum of discussion at this point. The rest of the paper will be taken up with discussing and investigating this question; here you just need to express it.
A research question can be framed either directly or indirectly.
- This study set out to answer the following question: What effects does daily use of Instagram have on the prevalence of body image issues among adolescent girls?
- We investigated the effects of daily Instagram use on the prevalence of body image issues among adolescent girls.
If your research involved testing hypotheses , these should be stated along with your research question. They are usually presented in the past tense, since the hypothesis will already have been tested by the time you are writing up your paper.
For example, the following hypothesis might respond to the research question above:
Scribbr Citation Checker New
The AI-powered Citation Checker helps you avoid common mistakes such as:
- Missing commas and periods
- Incorrect usage of “et al.”
- Ampersands (&) in narrative citations
- Missing reference entries
![relevance of the study research paper relevance of the study research paper](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/citation-checker-issue-example-1.png)
The final part of the introduction is often dedicated to a brief overview of the rest of the paper.
In a paper structured using the standard scientific “introduction, methods, results, discussion” format, this isn’t always necessary. But if your paper is structured in a less predictable way, it’s important to describe the shape of it for the reader.
If included, the overview should be concise, direct, and written in the present tense.
- This paper will first discuss several examples of survey-based research into adolescent social media use, then will go on to …
- This paper first discusses several examples of survey-based research into adolescent social media use, then goes on to …
Full examples of research paper introductions are shown in the tabs below: one for an argumentative paper, the other for an empirical paper.
- Argumentative paper
- Empirical paper
Are cows responsible for climate change? A recent study (RIVM, 2019) shows that cattle farmers account for two thirds of agricultural nitrogen emissions in the Netherlands. These emissions result from nitrogen in manure, which can degrade into ammonia and enter the atmosphere. The study’s calculations show that agriculture is the main source of nitrogen pollution, accounting for 46% of the country’s total emissions. By comparison, road traffic and households are responsible for 6.1% each, the industrial sector for 1%. While efforts are being made to mitigate these emissions, policymakers are reluctant to reckon with the scale of the problem. The approach presented here is a radical one, but commensurate with the issue. This paper argues that the Dutch government must stimulate and subsidize livestock farmers, especially cattle farmers, to transition to sustainable vegetable farming. It first establishes the inadequacy of current mitigation measures, then discusses the various advantages of the results proposed, and finally addresses potential objections to the plan on economic grounds.
The rise of social media has been accompanied by a sharp increase in the prevalence of body image issues among women and girls. This correlation has received significant academic attention: Various empirical studies have been conducted into Facebook usage among adolescent girls (Tiggermann & Slater, 2013; Meier & Gray, 2014). These studies have consistently found that the visual and interactive aspects of the platform have the greatest influence on body image issues. Despite this, highly visual social media (HVSM) such as Instagram have yet to be robustly researched. This paper sets out to address this research gap. We investigated the effects of daily Instagram use on the prevalence of body image issues among adolescent girls. It was hypothesized that daily Instagram use would be associated with an increase in body image concerns and a decrease in self-esteem ratings.
The introduction of a research paper includes several key elements:
- A hook to catch the reader’s interest
- Relevant background on the topic
- Details of your research problem
and your problem statement
- A thesis statement or research question
- Sometimes an overview of the paper
Don’t feel that you have to write the introduction first. The introduction is often one of the last parts of the research paper you’ll write, along with the conclusion.
This is because it can be easier to introduce your paper once you’ve already written the body ; you may not have the clearest idea of your arguments until you’ve written them, and things can change during the writing process .
The way you present your research problem in your introduction varies depending on the nature of your research paper . A research paper that presents a sustained argument will usually encapsulate this argument in a thesis statement .
A research paper designed to present the results of empirical research tends to present a research question that it seeks to answer. It may also include a hypothesis —a prediction that will be confirmed or disproved by your research.
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Caulfield, J. (2023, March 27). Writing a Research Paper Introduction | Step-by-Step Guide. Scribbr. Retrieved September 5, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-paper/research-paper-introduction/
Is this article helpful?
![relevance of the study research paper Jack Caulfield](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/jack-originalsquare-250-min.jpg)
Jack Caulfield
Other students also liked, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, writing a research paper conclusion | step-by-step guide, research paper format | apa, mla, & chicago templates, get unlimited documents corrected.
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
- Affiliate Program
![relevance of the study research paper Wordvice](https://pstatic.wordvice.com/wv-us/image/biglogo2.png)
- UNITED STATES
- 台灣 (TAIWAN)
- TÜRKIYE (TURKEY)
- Academic Editing Services
- - Research Paper
- - Journal Manuscript
- - Dissertation
- - College & University Assignments
- Admissions Editing Services
- - Application Essay
- - Personal Statement
- - Recommendation Letter
- - Cover Letter
- - CV/Resume
- Business Editing Services
- - Business Documents
- - Report & Brochure
- - Website & Blog
- Writer Editing Services
- - Script & Screenplay
- Our Editors
- Client Reviews
- Editing & Proofreading Prices
- Wordvice Points
- Partner Discount
- Plagiarism Checker
- APA Citation Generator
- MLA Citation Generator
- Chicago Citation Generator
- Vancouver Citation Generator
- - APA Style
- - MLA Style
- - Chicago Style
- - Vancouver Style
- Writing & Editing Guide
- Academic Resources
- Admissions Resources
How to Write the Rationale of the Study in Research (Examples)
What is the Rationale of the Study?
The rationale of the study is the justification for taking on a given study. It explains the reason the study was conducted or should be conducted. This means the study rationale should explain to the reader or examiner why the study is/was necessary. It is also sometimes called the “purpose” or “justification” of a study. While this is not difficult to grasp in itself, you might wonder how the rationale of the study is different from your research question or from the statement of the problem of your study, and how it fits into the rest of your thesis or research paper.
The rationale of the study links the background of the study to your specific research question and justifies the need for the latter on the basis of the former. In brief, you first provide and discuss existing data on the topic, and then you tell the reader, based on the background evidence you just presented, where you identified gaps or issues and why you think it is important to address those. The problem statement, lastly, is the formulation of the specific research question you choose to investigate, following logically from your rationale, and the approach you are planning to use to do that.
Table of Contents:
How to write a rationale for a research paper , how do you justify the need for a research study.
- Study Rationale Example: Where Does It Go In Your Paper?
The basis for writing a research rationale is preliminary data or a clear description of an observation. If you are doing basic/theoretical research, then a literature review will help you identify gaps in current knowledge. In applied/practical research, you base your rationale on an existing issue with a certain process (e.g., vaccine proof registration) or practice (e.g., patient treatment) that is well documented and needs to be addressed. By presenting the reader with earlier evidence or observations, you can (and have to) convince them that you are not just repeating what other people have already done or said and that your ideas are not coming out of thin air.
Once you have explained where you are coming from, you should justify the need for doing additional research–this is essentially the rationale of your study. Finally, when you have convinced the reader of the purpose of your work, you can end your introduction section with the statement of the problem of your research that contains clear aims and objectives and also briefly describes (and justifies) your methodological approach.
When is the Rationale for Research Written?
The author can present the study rationale both before and after the research is conducted.
- Before conducting research : The study rationale is a central component of the research proposal . It represents the plan of your work, constructed before the study is actually executed.
- Once research has been conducted : After the study is completed, the rationale is presented in a research article or PhD dissertation to explain why you focused on this specific research question. When writing the study rationale for this purpose, the author should link the rationale of the research to the aims and outcomes of the study.
What to Include in the Study Rationale
Although every study rationale is different and discusses different specific elements of a study’s method or approach, there are some elements that should be included to write a good rationale. Make sure to touch on the following:
- A summary of conclusions from your review of the relevant literature
- What is currently unknown (gaps in knowledge)
- Inconclusive or contested results from previous studies on the same or similar topic
- The necessity to improve or build on previous research, such as to improve methodology or utilize newer techniques and/or technologies
There are different types of limitations that you can use to justify the need for your study. In applied/practical research, the justification for investigating something is always that an existing process/practice has a problem or is not satisfactory. Let’s say, for example, that people in a certain country/city/community commonly complain about hospital care on weekends (not enough staff, not enough attention, no decisions being made), but you looked into it and realized that nobody ever investigated whether these perceived problems are actually based on objective shortages/non-availabilities of care or whether the lower numbers of patients who are treated during weekends are commensurate with the provided services.
In this case, “lack of data” is your justification for digging deeper into the problem. Or, if it is obvious that there is a shortage of staff and provided services on weekends, you could decide to investigate which of the usual procedures are skipped during weekends as a result and what the negative consequences are.
In basic/theoretical research, lack of knowledge is of course a common and accepted justification for additional research—but make sure that it is not your only motivation. “Nobody has ever done this” is only a convincing reason for a study if you explain to the reader why you think we should know more about this specific phenomenon. If there is earlier research but you think it has limitations, then those can usually be classified into “methodological”, “contextual”, and “conceptual” limitations. To identify such limitations, you can ask specific questions and let those questions guide you when you explain to the reader why your study was necessary:
Methodological limitations
- Did earlier studies try but failed to measure/identify a specific phenomenon?
- Was earlier research based on incorrect conceptualizations of variables?
- Were earlier studies based on questionable operationalizations of key concepts?
- Did earlier studies use questionable or inappropriate research designs?
Contextual limitations
- Have recent changes in the studied problem made previous studies irrelevant?
- Are you studying a new/particular context that previous findings do not apply to?
Conceptual limitations
- Do previous findings only make sense within a specific framework or ideology?
Study Rationale Examples
Let’s look at an example from one of our earlier articles on the statement of the problem to clarify how your rationale fits into your introduction section. This is a very short introduction for a practical research study on the challenges of online learning. Your introduction might be much longer (especially the context/background section), and this example does not contain any sources (which you will have to provide for all claims you make and all earlier studies you cite)—but please pay attention to how the background presentation , rationale, and problem statement blend into each other in a logical way so that the reader can follow and has no reason to question your motivation or the foundation of your research.
Background presentation
Since the beginning of the Covid pandemic, most educational institutions around the world have transitioned to a fully online study model, at least during peak times of infections and social distancing measures. This transition has not been easy and even two years into the pandemic, problems with online teaching and studying persist (reference needed) .
While the increasing gap between those with access to technology and equipment and those without access has been determined to be one of the main challenges (reference needed) , others claim that online learning offers more opportunities for many students by breaking down barriers of location and distance (reference needed) .
Rationale of the study
Since teachers and students cannot wait for circumstances to go back to normal, the measures that schools and universities have implemented during the last two years, their advantages and disadvantages, and the impact of those measures on students’ progress, satisfaction, and well-being need to be understood so that improvements can be made and demographics that have been left behind can receive the support they need as soon as possible.
Statement of the problem
To identify what changes in the learning environment were considered the most challenging and how those changes relate to a variety of student outcome measures, we conducted surveys and interviews among teachers and students at ten institutions of higher education in four different major cities, two in the US (New York and Chicago), one in South Korea (Seoul), and one in the UK (London). Responses were analyzed with a focus on different student demographics and how they might have been affected differently by the current situation.
How long is a study rationale?
In a research article bound for journal publication, your rationale should not be longer than a few sentences (no longer than one brief paragraph). A dissertation or thesis usually allows for a longer description; depending on the length and nature of your document, this could be up to a couple of paragraphs in length. A completely novel or unconventional approach might warrant a longer and more detailed justification than an approach that slightly deviates from well-established methods and approaches.
Consider Using Professional Academic Editing Services
Now that you know how to write the rationale of the study for a research proposal or paper, you should make use of Wordvice AI’s free AI Grammar Checker , or receive professional academic proofreading services from Wordvice, including research paper editing services and manuscript editing services to polish your submitted research documents.
You can also find many more articles, for example on writing the other parts of your research paper , on choosing a title , or on making sure you understand and adhere to the author instructions before you submit to a journal, on the Wordvice academic resources pages.
- USC Libraries
- Research Guides
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
- The Research Problem/Question
- Purpose of Guide
- Design Flaws to Avoid
- Independent and Dependent Variables
- Glossary of Research Terms
- Reading Research Effectively
- Narrowing a Topic Idea
- Broadening a Topic Idea
- Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
- Academic Writing Style
- Applying Critical Thinking
- Choosing a Title
- Making an Outline
- Paragraph Development
- Research Process Video Series
- Executive Summary
- The C.A.R.S. Model
- Background Information
- Theoretical Framework
- Citation Tracking
- Content Alert Services
- Evaluating Sources
- Primary Sources
- Secondary Sources
- Tiertiary Sources
- Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
- Qualitative Methods
- Quantitative Methods
- Insiderness
- Using Non-Textual Elements
- Limitations of the Study
- Common Grammar Mistakes
- Writing Concisely
- Avoiding Plagiarism
- Footnotes or Endnotes?
- Further Readings
- Generative AI and Writing
- USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
- Bibliography
A research problem is a definite or clear expression [statement] about an area of concern, a condition to be improved upon, a difficulty to be eliminated, or a troubling question that exists in scholarly literature, in theory, or within existing practice that points to a need for meaningful understanding and deliberate investigation. A research problem does not state how to do something, offer a vague or broad proposition, or present a value question. In the social and behavioral sciences, studies are most often framed around examining a problem that needs to be understood and resolved in order to improve society and the human condition.
Bryman, Alan. “The Research Question in Social Research: What is its Role?” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 10 (2007): 5-20; Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research . Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, editors. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994), pp. 105-117; Pardede, Parlindungan. “Identifying and Formulating the Research Problem." Research in ELT: Module 4 (October 2018): 1-13; Li, Yanmei, and Sumei Zhang. "Identifying the Research Problem." In Applied Research Methods in Urban and Regional Planning . (Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2022), pp. 13-21.
Importance of...
The purpose of a problem statement is to:
- Introduce the reader to the importance of the topic being studied . The reader is oriented to the significance of the study.
- Anchors the research questions, hypotheses, or assumptions to follow . It offers a concise statement about the purpose of your paper.
- Place the topic into a particular context that defines the parameters of what is to be investigated.
- Provide the framework for reporting the results and indicates what is probably necessary to conduct the study and explain how the findings will present this information.
In the social sciences, the research problem establishes the means by which you must answer the "So What?" question. This declarative question refers to a research problem surviving the relevancy test [the quality of a measurement procedure that provides repeatability and accuracy]. Note that answering the "So What?" question requires a commitment on your part to not only show that you have reviewed the literature, but that you have thoroughly considered the significance of the research problem and its implications applied to creating new knowledge and understanding or informing practice.
To survive the "So What" question, problem statements should possess the following attributes:
- Clarity and precision [a well-written statement does not make sweeping generalizations and irresponsible pronouncements; it also does include unspecific determinates like "very" or "giant"],
- Demonstrate a researchable topic or issue [i.e., feasibility of conducting the study is based upon access to information that can be effectively acquired, gathered, interpreted, synthesized, and understood],
- Identification of what would be studied, while avoiding the use of value-laden words and terms,
- Identification of an overarching question or small set of questions accompanied by key factors or variables,
- Identification of key concepts and terms,
- Articulation of the study's conceptual boundaries or parameters or limitations,
- Some generalizability in regards to applicability and bringing results into general use,
- Conveyance of the study's importance, benefits, and justification [i.e., regardless of the type of research, it is important to demonstrate that the research is not trivial],
- Does not have unnecessary jargon or overly complex sentence constructions; and,
- Conveyance of more than the mere gathering of descriptive data providing only a snapshot of the issue or phenomenon under investigation.
Bryman, Alan. “The Research Question in Social Research: What is its Role?” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 10 (2007): 5-20; Brown, Perry J., Allen Dyer, and Ross S. Whaley. "Recreation Research—So What?" Journal of Leisure Research 5 (1973): 16-24; Castellanos, Susie. Critical Writing and Thinking. The Writing Center. Dean of the College. Brown University; Ellis, Timothy J. and Yair Levy Nova. "Framework of Problem-Based Research: A Guide for Novice Researchers on the Development of a Research-Worthy Problem." Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 11 (2008); Thesis and Purpose Statements. The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin, Madison; Thesis Statements. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Tips and Examples for Writing Thesis Statements. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Selwyn, Neil. "‘So What?’…A Question that Every Journal Article Needs to Answer." Learning, Media, and Technology 39 (2014): 1-5; Shoket, Mohd. "Research Problem: Identification and Formulation." International Journal of Research 1 (May 2014): 512-518.
Structure and Writing Style
I. Types and Content
There are four general conceptualizations of a research problem in the social sciences:
- Casuist Research Problem -- this type of problem relates to the determination of right and wrong in questions of conduct or conscience by analyzing moral dilemmas through the application of general rules and the careful distinction of special cases.
- Difference Research Problem -- typically asks the question, “Is there a difference between two or more groups or treatments?” This type of problem statement is used when the researcher compares or contrasts two or more phenomena. This a common approach to defining a problem in the clinical social sciences or behavioral sciences.
- Descriptive Research Problem -- typically asks the question, "what is...?" with the underlying purpose to describe the significance of a situation, state, or existence of a specific phenomenon. This problem is often associated with revealing hidden or understudied issues.
- Relational Research Problem -- suggests a relationship of some sort between two or more variables to be investigated. The underlying purpose is to investigate specific qualities or characteristics that may be connected in some way.
A problem statement in the social sciences should contain :
- A lead-in that helps ensure the reader will maintain interest over the study,
- A declaration of originality [e.g., mentioning a knowledge void or a lack of clarity about a topic that will be revealed in the literature review of prior research],
- An indication of the central focus of the study [establishing the boundaries of analysis], and
- An explanation of the study's significance or the benefits to be derived from investigating the research problem.
NOTE: A statement describing the research problem of your paper should not be viewed as a thesis statement that you may be familiar with from high school. Given the content listed above, a description of the research problem is usually a short paragraph in length.
II. Sources of Problems for Investigation
The identification of a problem to study can be challenging, not because there's a lack of issues that could be investigated, but due to the challenge of formulating an academically relevant and researchable problem which is unique and does not simply duplicate the work of others. To facilitate how you might select a problem from which to build a research study, consider these sources of inspiration:
Deductions from Theory This relates to deductions made from social philosophy or generalizations embodied in life and in society that the researcher is familiar with. These deductions from human behavior are then placed within an empirical frame of reference through research. From a theory, the researcher can formulate a research problem or hypothesis stating the expected findings in certain empirical situations. The research asks the question: “What relationship between variables will be observed if theory aptly summarizes the state of affairs?” One can then design and carry out a systematic investigation to assess whether empirical data confirm or reject the hypothesis, and hence, the theory.
Interdisciplinary Perspectives Identifying a problem that forms the basis for a research study can come from academic movements and scholarship originating in disciplines outside of your primary area of study. This can be an intellectually stimulating exercise. A review of pertinent literature should include examining research from related disciplines that can reveal new avenues of exploration and analysis. An interdisciplinary approach to selecting a research problem offers an opportunity to construct a more comprehensive understanding of a very complex issue that any single discipline may be able to provide.
Interviewing Practitioners The identification of research problems about particular topics can arise from formal interviews or informal discussions with practitioners who provide insight into new directions for future research and how to make research findings more relevant to practice. Discussions with experts in the field, such as, teachers, social workers, health care providers, lawyers, business leaders, etc., offers the chance to identify practical, “real world” problems that may be understudied or ignored within academic circles. This approach also provides some practical knowledge which may help in the process of designing and conducting your study.
Personal Experience Don't undervalue your everyday experiences or encounters as worthwhile problems for investigation. Think critically about your own experiences and/or frustrations with an issue facing society or related to your community, your neighborhood, your family, or your personal life. This can be derived, for example, from deliberate observations of certain relationships for which there is no clear explanation or witnessing an event that appears harmful to a person or group or that is out of the ordinary.
Relevant Literature The selection of a research problem can be derived from a thorough review of pertinent research associated with your overall area of interest. This may reveal where gaps exist in understanding a topic or where an issue has been understudied. Research may be conducted to: 1) fill such gaps in knowledge; 2) evaluate if the methodologies employed in prior studies can be adapted to solve other problems; or, 3) determine if a similar study could be conducted in a different subject area or applied in a different context or to different study sample [i.e., different setting or different group of people]. Also, authors frequently conclude their studies by noting implications for further research; read the conclusion of pertinent studies because statements about further research can be a valuable source for identifying new problems to investigate. The fact that a researcher has identified a topic worthy of further exploration validates the fact it is worth pursuing.
III. What Makes a Good Research Statement?
A good problem statement begins by introducing the broad area in which your research is centered, gradually leading the reader to the more specific issues you are investigating. The statement need not be lengthy, but a good research problem should incorporate the following features:
1. Compelling Topic The problem chosen should be one that motivates you to address it but simple curiosity is not a good enough reason to pursue a research study because this does not indicate significance. The problem that you choose to explore must be important to you, but it must also be viewed as important by your readers and to a the larger academic and/or social community that could be impacted by the results of your study. 2. Supports Multiple Perspectives The problem must be phrased in a way that avoids dichotomies and instead supports the generation and exploration of multiple perspectives. A general rule of thumb in the social sciences is that a good research problem is one that would generate a variety of viewpoints from a composite audience made up of reasonable people. 3. Researchability This isn't a real word but it represents an important aspect of creating a good research statement. It seems a bit obvious, but you don't want to find yourself in the midst of investigating a complex research project and realize that you don't have enough prior research to draw from for your analysis. There's nothing inherently wrong with original research, but you must choose research problems that can be supported, in some way, by the resources available to you. If you are not sure if something is researchable, don't assume that it isn't if you don't find information right away--seek help from a librarian !
NOTE: Do not confuse a research problem with a research topic. A topic is something to read and obtain information about, whereas a problem is something to be solved or framed as a question raised for inquiry, consideration, or solution, or explained as a source of perplexity, distress, or vexation. In short, a research topic is something to be understood; a research problem is something that needs to be investigated.
IV. Asking Analytical Questions about the Research Problem
Research problems in the social and behavioral sciences are often analyzed around critical questions that must be investigated. These questions can be explicitly listed in the introduction [i.e., "This study addresses three research questions about women's psychological recovery from domestic abuse in multi-generational home settings..."], or, the questions are implied in the text as specific areas of study related to the research problem. Explicitly listing your research questions at the end of your introduction can help in designing a clear roadmap of what you plan to address in your study, whereas, implicitly integrating them into the text of the introduction allows you to create a more compelling narrative around the key issues under investigation. Either approach is appropriate.
The number of questions you attempt to address should be based on the complexity of the problem you are investigating and what areas of inquiry you find most critical to study. Practical considerations, such as, the length of the paper you are writing or the availability of resources to analyze the issue can also factor in how many questions to ask. In general, however, there should be no more than four research questions underpinning a single research problem.
Given this, well-developed analytical questions can focus on any of the following:
- Highlights a genuine dilemma, area of ambiguity, or point of confusion about a topic open to interpretation by your readers;
- Yields an answer that is unexpected and not obvious rather than inevitable and self-evident;
- Provokes meaningful thought or discussion;
- Raises the visibility of the key ideas or concepts that may be understudied or hidden;
- Suggests the need for complex analysis or argument rather than a basic description or summary; and,
- Offers a specific path of inquiry that avoids eliciting generalizations about the problem.
NOTE: Questions of how and why concerning a research problem often require more analysis than questions about who, what, where, and when. You should still ask yourself these latter questions, however. Thinking introspectively about the who, what, where, and when of a research problem can help ensure that you have thoroughly considered all aspects of the problem under investigation and helps define the scope of the study in relation to the problem.
V. Mistakes to Avoid
Beware of circular reasoning! Do not state the research problem as simply the absence of the thing you are suggesting. For example, if you propose the following, "The problem in this community is that there is no hospital," this only leads to a research problem where:
- The need is for a hospital
- The objective is to create a hospital
- The method is to plan for building a hospital, and
- The evaluation is to measure if there is a hospital or not.
This is an example of a research problem that fails the "So What?" test . In this example, the problem does not reveal the relevance of why you are investigating the fact there is no hospital in the community [e.g., perhaps there's a hospital in the community ten miles away]; it does not elucidate the significance of why one should study the fact there is no hospital in the community [e.g., that hospital in the community ten miles away has no emergency room]; the research problem does not offer an intellectual pathway towards adding new knowledge or clarifying prior knowledge [e.g., the county in which there is no hospital already conducted a study about the need for a hospital, but it was conducted ten years ago]; and, the problem does not offer meaningful outcomes that lead to recommendations that can be generalized for other situations or that could suggest areas for further research [e.g., the challenges of building a new hospital serves as a case study for other communities].
Alvesson, Mats and Jörgen Sandberg. “Generating Research Questions Through Problematization.” Academy of Management Review 36 (April 2011): 247-271 ; Choosing and Refining Topics. Writing@CSU. Colorado State University; D'Souza, Victor S. "Use of Induction and Deduction in Research in Social Sciences: An Illustration." Journal of the Indian Law Institute 24 (1982): 655-661; Ellis, Timothy J. and Yair Levy Nova. "Framework of Problem-Based Research: A Guide for Novice Researchers on the Development of a Research-Worthy Problem." Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 11 (2008); How to Write a Research Question. The Writing Center. George Mason University; Invention: Developing a Thesis Statement. The Reading/Writing Center. Hunter College; Problem Statements PowerPoint Presentation. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Procter, Margaret. Using Thesis Statements. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Shoket, Mohd. "Research Problem: Identification and Formulation." International Journal of Research 1 (May 2014): 512-518; Trochim, William M.K. Problem Formulation. Research Methods Knowledge Base. 2006; Thesis and Purpose Statements. The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin, Madison; Thesis Statements. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Tips and Examples for Writing Thesis Statements. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Pardede, Parlindungan. “Identifying and Formulating the Research Problem." Research in ELT: Module 4 (October 2018): 1-13; Walk, Kerry. Asking an Analytical Question. [Class handout or worksheet]. Princeton University; White, Patrick. Developing Research Questions: A Guide for Social Scientists . New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2009; Li, Yanmei, and Sumei Zhang. "Identifying the Research Problem." In Applied Research Methods in Urban and Regional Planning . (Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2022), pp. 13-21.
- << Previous: Background Information
- Next: Theoretical Framework >>
- Last Updated: Sep 4, 2024 9:40 AM
- URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide
![relevance of the study research paper Afribary](https://afribary.com/knowledge/content/images/2020/11/logo.png)
How to Write Significance of the Study in a Project Research Paper
When you write your thesis or research paper, there is a section of your introduction that is allotted to the significance of the study. The purpose of this section is to state why your study was needed and the contribution of your research to your field.
In this guide, you will learn the meaning of the significance of the study in your research paper and how to write one.
What is the Significance of the Study?
The significance of the study is basically a written statement that explains why your research was important. It justifies why your research was needed, the impact of your research in your field, its contribution, and how others (audience) would benefit from it.
Also referred to as the rationale of the study, the significance of the study is important to communicate why your research is important to your reader. It is important to make clear the significance of your study for easy comprehension by the readers.
Tips for writing the significance of the study
Reflect on the Problem Statement When writing this section of your paper, first reflect on what contribution your research is making to your field, the gaps in knowledge in your research field, and why your work should be published.
Your problem statement should be reflected in the introduction of the significance of the study. Your research problem statement can guide you to identify specific contributions your research is making to your field of study.
Write from a general contribution to a specific contribution Write your significance of the study in an inverted pyramid format. Start with your research contribution to society as a whole, and then proceed to narrow it down to a specific individual or group of people.
When writing your statement of study, the length should not be more than 500 words for a thesis and around 200 words for a research paper.
However, note that writing the significance of study depends on your subject area and your content as there is no single way of writing a perfect significance of study.
An Example of Significance of Study
This study's findings will further reveal how management-employee bilateral relationships can be strengthened while improving workplace productivity. The findings would be of major importance in assessing how collective bargaining can be a major tool in improving workplace performance in a developing economy like Nigeria. Collective bargaining would help both management and employees bargain on terms and conditions of service and resolve their grievances without leading to strikes, lock-outs, and other forms of industrial actions. The best approach in negotiating on the bargaining table is to provide employees with the importance of collective bargaining as the best method of settling the industrial conflict, which will improve their productivity and lead to higher organizational performance.
The significance of the study is used in academic writing by students and researchers to communicate the importance of a research problem. This section describes specific contributions made to your field of study and who benefits from it. Also, the extent to which the study matters and its potential benefits to people, researchers, departments and other fields are discussed here. This statement is written at the end of your introduction and should be well attended to.
![relevance of the study research paper U.S. flag](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/coreutils/uswds/img/favicons/favicon-57.png)
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- Int J Med Educ
- PMC10693955
The importance of crafting a good introduction to scholarly research: strategies for creating an effective and impactful opening statement
Mohsen tavakol.
1 Medical Education Centre, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, UK
David O'Brien
Introduction.
The introduction section is arguably one of the most critical elements of a written piece of research work, often setting the tone for the remainder of any dissertation or research article. The primary purpose of an introduction is to provide the reader with a clear understanding of the research question, in addition to the scope, rationale, aims and objectives of the study. This ensures the reader can more easily comprehend the context of the research, which will consequently help them better interpret and evaluate the study results. One could liken an introduction to a trailer for a movie, where the plot of the film (the research topic) is introduced by setting the scene (outlining the significance of the topic) and enticing you to watch the full movie (understanding the research and its importance).
Despite this, our experience suggests that students frequently pay insufficient attention to the introduction section of their dissertation or omit elements which we consider essential to address. This editorial aims to help researchers appreciate the importance of a comprehensive dissertation introduction in medical education research and learn how to effectively manage this key section of their work. Although it focuses purely on the introduction section of a written research submission, readers interested in learning more about the other primary steps of the research process are encouraged to read AMEE Guide No. 90 1 , 2 textbooks on research methods and both consult and seek constructive feedback from colleagues with expertise in research methods and writing for publication.
Here we aim to provide the reader with a simple structure of how best to construct the introduction for a dissertation and recommend that this should typically include the following essential components and principles.
Background to the research topic
The purpose of providing background information in an introduction is to supply the context and other essential information concerning the research topic, and thus allow the reader to understand the significance of the specific research question and where it sits within the broader field of study. This aids the reader to better understand how the research question contributes to the existing body of knowledge and why it is, necessary to investigate this specific aspect further. For example, suppose the study concerns the effectiveness of simulation-based training in medical education. In this case, the broader field of the study may include relevant areas such as medical simulation, medical education research, health care education, standardised patients, simulation-based training, and curriculum development based on simulation training. After providing the reader with an understanding of the context and relevance of the topic of interest, the researcher must then establish a theoretical or conceptual framework. This underpins the study topic in order that the reader can understand how any research questions and objectives are formulated. It is important to distinguish between these two frameworks. A theoretical framework describes the rationale for applying a particular theory to provide support and structure for the topic being studied. In the absence of an applicable theory, a conceptual framework substantiates the significance of a particular problem, context or phenomenon within a specific area of the study by illustrating its relevance and connection to research topic. 3 A conceptual framework highlights the importance of a research topic by showing how it relates to the larger body of knowledge in a particular field. Here is an example to demonstrate the use of a theoretical framework in a research context.
When considering Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), one of the key constructs is self-efficacy, as described by Albert Bandura, 4 and refers to the belief that a person has it within their own ability to accomplish a specific task successfully. This is not related to what a person does, but more how they perceive their ability to use these skills. So, based on this construct of self-efficacy, a researcher may formulate a research hypothesis; that examiners with higher self-efficacy in OSCEs will demonstrate improved performance in subsequent exams compared to those with lower self-efficacy. Now the researcher is in a position to identify the fundamental concepts of the research, i.e., self-efficacy (personal factors), examiner performance (behavioural factors) and examination conditions and examiner scaffolding support (environmental factors). Identifying key concepts helps the researcher find the relationship between these, and develop appropriate research questions, e.g., 1) How does an examiner's self-efficacy in OSCEs affect their ability to assess students in subsequent exams? 2) How does the support provided to examiners and exam conditions influence the link between self-efficacy and examiner performance in OSCEs? 3) Do examiners with high self-efficacy provide fairer scores than those with low self-efficacy in OSCEs? By having a theoretical framework, researchers can establish a foundation for their research and provide a clear picture of the relationship between the key concepts involved in the study. Researchers must also provide any conceptual and operational definitions for key concepts or variables that will be used in the study. Clearly defining key concepts and variables in the background section of a dissertation can also help establish the significance of the research question and its relevance to the broader field of study. As the name implies, a conceptual definition refers to a variable's meaning in a conceptual, abstract, or theoretical sense. Conceptual definitions are often used to describe concepts which cannot be directly measured, such as active learning, rote learning, inter-professional learning, inter-professional education, or constructs such as clinical performance. Conversely, operational definitions define the steps researchers must take in order to collect data to measure a phenomenon or concept. 5 For example, clinical performance can be considered a conceptual construct but may also be defined operationally as the ability of students to pass 12 out of 16 stations of an OSCE. The researcher having already pre-specified specific the criteria for classifying students as pass/fail in order to determine the ability of students to perform clinically. This operational definition provides a clear method for evaluating and measuring student ability, which can then be used to give feedback and guide further learning or to establish clear expectations for students and provide a basis for evaluating and assessing their performance. In general, it can be beneficial for medical education programs to define aspects such as clinical performance operationally in this way in rather than conceptually, especially if there is a need to ensure that students meet a required standard of competence and are prepared for the demands of real-world clinical practice. These definitions can also then be used to establish the methods and criteria by which the variables of the study will subsequently be measured or altered.
Citing the existing literature to support the research aim
A literature review is the process of critically evaluating existing research and utilising it to inform and guide the research proposal under investigation. Taking this approach enables researchers to ensure that their research is not only grounded in, but also contributes meaningfully to, any existing knowledge as a whole. Critically reviewing the literature provides evidence and justification for any research and is essential when formulating a hypothesis, question, or study objectives. In addition, and perhaps most importantly, it helps identify any gaps or inconsistencies in the existing knowledge base. Determining the knowledge gap is critical in justifying the necessity for our research and advancing knowledge. A comprehensive literature review also helps establish the theoretical or conceptual frameworks to ground any subsequent research, providing researchers with guidance and direction on how best to conduct their future studies. Understanding from the literature what has worked previously and what may pose challenges or limitations assists researchers when exploring the best methods and techniques for answering new research questions. To clarify, consider a hypothetical study in which researchers wish to examine the effectiveness of a specific educational intervention in medical students to improve patient safety. Based on the existing literature, let's assume that researchers learned that most studies had only focused on short-term outcomes rather than long-term ones. The long-term effects of any intervention in medical students on patient safety therefore remain uncertain. Researchers may therefore wish to consider conducting longitudinal studies months after interventions have been carried out, rather than simply repeating research based on short-term outcomes, in order to address the current knowledge gap. A review of existing literature may highlight hitherto previously unconsidered logistical difficulties in conducting longitudinal studies in this area that the researcher may need to be aware of.
Stating the significance of the research
More than simply reporting the existing research, one of the key objectives in any literature review is to summarise and synthesise existing research on the intended topic in order to analyse the significance of the research in question. In this process, diverse ideas can be merged to form fresh new perspectives. Any gaps, limitations, or controversies in medical education can be identified, and potential future benefits and implications of the proposed research explained to the reader. Based on any potential impact or perceived importance, the introduction provides an excellent opportunity for the researcher to affirm the significance of the research study and why it should be conducted.
By way of an example, the significance of a study concerning feedback given to examiners for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) is used to illustrate this point further. The potential significance of this research lies in improving the validity and reliability of OSCE scores in medical education. As a result of reviewing different types of feedback given to examiners, the research may assist in identifying the most effective strategies for improving the quality of OSCEs in medical education. By providing new insights into how feedback can improve the reliability and validity of OSCE results, the research could also contribute to the broader knowledge of assessment in general. This may result in the development of more accurate and robust medical education assessments, which in turn may potentially enhance delivery of healthcare and improve patient outcomes and safety. It may also address the current challenges and gaps in medical education assessment by providing evidence-based approaches for improving OSCE quality.
Formulating Research Questions and Objectives
Researchers formulate research questions and objectives based on the topic they are seeking to address. As noted previously, these will have already been derived as a result of a comprehensive literature review of any existing knowledge and based on a theoretical or conceptual framework. Furthermore, in medical education, the literature review provides researchers with the opportunity to formulate new research questions or research objectives to address any gaps or limitations in the existing literature and add something new to the current body of knowledge. Research questions and objectives should be stated clearly, being both specific, and measurable. These should then guide the subsequent selection of appropriate research methods, data collection and any subsequent analytical process. Clear, focused, and rigorous research questions and objectives will ensure the study is well-designed and make a valuable contribution to the existing body of knowledge.
Qualitative research questions should be open-ended and exploratory rather than focused on a specific hypothesis or proposition. It is common for qualitative studies to focus on understanding how and why certain phenomena occur, rather than simply describing what has occurred. These should be formulated to elicit rich, detailed, and context-specific data that can provide insights into the experiences, perspectives, and meanings of the participants. In contrast, quantitative research questions are more specific and are designed to test a particular hypothesis or relationship. In medical education, it is imperative to emphasise the importance of both qualitative and quantitative research questions when it comes to generating new knowledge. Combining both quantitative and qualitative research methods (mixed methods) can be particularly powerful in providing a more comprehensive understanding of any phenomena under study. Assume again that we are examining the effectiveness of feedback on the performance of medical students and adopt a mixed-methods approach using a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods. A quantitative research question may be, what is the impact of feedback on the performance of medical students as measured by OSCE mark? How the experience of receiving feedback on performance contributes to the future professional development of medical students is a more qualitative research question. This combination of quantitative and qualitative research questions will provide an in depth understanding of the effectiveness of feedback on medical student performance. It is important to note that in qualitative research methods particularly, there can be a wide variety of research question types. For example, grounded theory researchers may ask so-called "process questions", such as 'how do students interpret and use the feedback they are given?' Phenomenologists, on the other hand, are concerned with lived experience of research subjects and frequently ask questions looking to understand the "meaning" of any such experience, often aiming to attribute feelings to this experience, for example, ‘how do students feel when they receive feedback?’ Ethnographers look to understand how culture contributes to an experience, and may ask more "descriptive questions" 5 for example, ‘how does the culture within a specific medical school affect students receiving feedback on their performance?’
For ease of reference, the key points we recommended are considered in any dissertation introduction are summarised below:
1. Set the context for the research
2. Establish a theoretical or conceptual framework to support your study
3. Define key variables both conceptually and theoretically
4. Critically appraise relevant papers during the literature review
5. Review previous studies to identify and define the knowledge gap by assessing what has already been studied and what areas remain unexplored
6. Clearly articulate the rationale behind your study, emphasising its importance in the intended field
7. Clearly define your research objectives, questions, and hypotheses
Conclusions
Whilst crafting a research introduction may seem a challenging and time-consuming task, it is well worth the effort to convey your research clearly and engage potential readers. Providing sufficient background information on the research topic, conducting a comprehensive review of the existing research, determining the knowledge gap, understanding any limitations or controversies in the topic of interest, before then exploring any theoretical or conceptual frameworks to develop the research concepts, research questions and methodology are fundamental steps. Articulating any conceptual and operational definitions of key concepts and clearly defining any key terms, including explanations of how these will be used in the study is also paramount to a good introduction. It is essential to clearly present the rationale behind the research and why this is significant, clarifying what it adds to the existing body of knowledge in medical education and exploring any potential future implications. Lastly, it is vital to ensure that any research questions are clearly stated and are open-ended and exploratory in the case of qualitative studies, or specific and measurable in the case of quantitative studies.
We feel that observing these basic principles and adhering to these few simple steps will hopefully set the stage for a highly successful piece of research and will certainly go some way to achieving a favourable editorial outcome for possible subsequent publication of the work.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The university of tulsa Online Blog
Trending topics in the tu online community
Nursing Research: What It Is and Why It Matters
When people think about medical research, they often think about cutting-edge surgical procedures and revolutionary new medications. As important as those advancements are, another type of research is just as vital: nursing research.
This type of research informs and improves nursing practice. In many cases, it’s focused on improving patient care. Experienced nurses who have advanced nursing degrees and training in research design typically conduct this research.
Nurse research can explore any number of topics, from symptomology to patient diet. However, no matter the focus of a research project, nurse research can improve health care in an impressive number of ways. As experts in their field, nurse researchers can pursue a wide range of unique career advancement opportunities .
Why Nursing Research Matters: Examples of Research in Action
Research drives innovation in every industry. Given that nurses are on the front line of the health care industry, the research they do can be particularly impactful for patient outcomes.
It Can Improve Patients’ Quality of Life
Patients diagnosed with life-threatening chronic diseases often undergo intense treatments with sometimes debilitating side effects. Nursing research is vital to helping such patients maintain a high quality of life.
For example, a 2018 study led by a nurse scientist explored why cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy frequently experience severe nausea. While the physical toll of chemotherapy contributes to nausea, the study found that patients who have factors such as children to take care of, high psychological stress, and trouble performing day-to-day tasks are often much more likely to experience nausea.
By identifying the root causes of nausea and which patients are more likely to experience it, this research allows health care professionals to develop evidence-based care practices . This can include prescribing anti-nausea medications and connecting patients to mental health professionals.
It’s Central to Making Health Care More Equitabl
A Gallup survey reports that about 38% of Americans put off seeking medical treatment due to costs. Unfortunately, cost is only one factor that prevents people from seeking treatment. Many Americans don’t live close to medical providers that can meet their needs, aren’t educated about health, or encounter discrimination.
As complex as this issue is, the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) asserts that the country’s nurse researchers can lead the charge in tackling it. In its strategic plan for 2022 to 2026, the institute highlights the following:
- Nursing has long been one of the most trusted professions in the country.
- Nurses often interact with patients, patients’ families, and communities more frequently than other health care professionals.
- The care that nurses provide must often take environmental and social factors into account.
These traits put nurses in the position to not only research health inequity but also put their research to work in their organizations. To help make that happen, NINR often funds nurse-led research projects focused on equity and social determinants of health. With that kind of backing, the field may become more transformative than ever.
It Can Strengthen the Health Care Workforce
While nursing research can be used to improve patient care, it can also be leveraged to solve issues health care professionals face daily. Research about the state of the health care workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic is a perfect illustration.
In 2022, a team of nurse researchers published a report called Nursing Crisis: Challenges and Opportunities for Our Profession After COVID-19 in the International Journal of Nursing Practice . In it, the authors provided concrete statistics about the following:
- Mental and physical health issues many nurses encountered
- Effects of increased workloads and decreased nurse-to-patient ratios
- How many nurses were planning to leave the profession altogether
As nurses themselves, the authors also offer actionable, evidence-based solutions to these issues, such as streamlining patient documentation systems and implementing employee wellness programs.
However, this type of research isn’t just important to solving workforce issues stemming from specific emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. By publishing quantifiable data about the challenges they face, nurse researchers empower other nurses and professional nursing organizations to advocate for themselves. This can help employers enact effective policies, support their nursing staff, and draw more talented people into the profession.
Career Opportunities in Nursing Research
Nurse researchers can work in any number of administrative, direct care, and academic roles. However, because nurse research often requires clinical care and data analysis skills, jobs in this field typically require an advanced degree, such as a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN).
While many more nurse research career opportunities exist, here are four career paths nurses with research experience and advanced degrees can explore.
Nurse Researcher
Nurse researchers identify issues related to nursing practice, collect data about them, and conduct research projects designed to inform practice and policy. While they often work in academic medical centers and universities, they can work for any type of health care provider as well as health care advocacy agencies.
In addition to conducting research, these professionals typically provide direct patient care. Many also write papers for peer-reviewed journals and make presentations about their work at conferences.
Clinical Research Nurse
Despite having a similar title to nurse researchers, clinical research nurses have slightly different responsibilities. These professionals are usually in charge of providing care to patients participating in medical research projects, including clinical trials and nursing research initiatives. They also typically collect data about patient progress, coordinate care between different team members, and contribute to academic papers.
Occupational Health Nurse
Also referred to as environmental health nurses, occupational health nurses serve specific communities, such as professionals in a particular industry or people who live in a particular area. They often educate their communities about relevant health risks, advocate for stronger health and safety regulations, and run wellness programs.
To carry out their duties, occupational and environmental health nurses must typically research health trends about the people they serve, including living and working conditions that put them at risk for illness or injury. They can work for private companies and government agencies.
Nurse Educator
Nurse educators prepare new nurses to enter the workforce or train experienced nurses in more advanced techniques. This can include teaching classes and providing on-the-job training. They often work for colleges, universities, and large health care providers.
While their duties don’t always include research, nurse educators must keep up with the health care industry’s needs and new patient care practices. This is so they can provide relevant education themselves and help their organizations design up-to-date curricula.
Make Nursing Research a Part of Your Journey
Conducting and implementing nurse research is a collaborative effort. It takes a team of informed leaders, skilled analysts, and creative educators to create effective, evidence-based policies. Those interested in pursuing nurse research should consider The University of Tulsa’s online MSN program , which can prepare you to fill any one of those roles and more.
All of TU’s MSN students take classes on research and evidence-based practices. However, the program’s specialty tracks allow students to take their studies in multiple research-oriented directions. For instance, if you’re interested in collecting and interpreting clinical data, you can choose the Informatics and Analysis track. If you have a passion for public health policy, the Public Health and Global Vision track includes classes on population health and epidemiology.
Delivered in a flexible online format, this program can be a great option for working nurses and nontraditional students alike. To find out more, read about TU’s admission policies and request more information today.
Recommended Readings
A Nurse Educator’s Role in the Future of Nursing
How Global Health Nursing Supports Population Health
What Can You Do With an MSN?
Gallup, “Record High in U.S. Put Off Medical Care Due to Cost in 2022”
International Journal of Nursing Practice, “Nursing Crisis: Challenges and Opportunities for Our Profession After COVID‐19”
Journal of Pain Symptom Management , “Risk Factors Associated With Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea in the Week Prior to the Next Cycle and Impact of Nausea on Quality of Life Outcomes”
Mayo Clinic, Nursing
National Institute of Nursing Research, Scientific Strategy: NINR’s Research Framework
National Institute of Nursing Research, The National Institute of Nursing Research 2022-2026 Strategic Plan
Recent Articles
![relevance of the study research paper A group of medical professionals standing and looking at a tablet.](https://static.archerdxp.io/cms/7573dcb0-a5d7-4ab4-a229-d0fa54b28aef.jpg)
How Leaders Drive Quality Improvement in Nursing
University of Tulsa
Aug 23, 2024
![relevance of the study research paper Wellness nurse and older patient smile while looking out a window together.](https://static.archerdxp.io/cms/9518a93d-9ea9-4869-8ab0-b151ffa3e7ba.jpg)
Wellness Nurse: Career Definition and More
![relevance of the study research paper Nursing Students Share Notes While Gathered Around a Table at the Hospital.](https://static.archerdxp.io/cms/fc70e12b-2975-4ca2-b5f5-c0110520f861.jpg)
Types of Nursing Degrees
Aug 21, 2024
Learn more about the benefits of receiving your degree from The University of Tulsa
- Online Program Tuition
- AGACNP Certificate Online
- Online MSN Program
- Accelerated Online BSN
- RN to BSN Program
- RN to MSN Program
- MS in Cyber Security
- Meet the Team
- Nursing Student Practicum Requirements
- Disclosures for Professional Nursing Licensure
- On Campus Programs
Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.
For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .
Loading metrics
Open Access
Peer-reviewed
Research Article
In-shoe plantar shear stress sensor design, calibration and evaluation for the diabetic foot
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering (MACE), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
![relevance of the study research paper ORCID logo](https://journals.plos.org/resource/img/orcid_16x16.png)
Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation Medical School, NIHR Exeter BRC, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
Roles Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing
Roles Investigation, Software, Writing – review & editing
Roles Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Research in Science and Engineering faculty of Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
Affiliation Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust within the Departments of Diabetes and Vascular Surgery, Manchester, United Kingdom
Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected]
- Athia H. Haron,
- Lutong Li,
- Jiawei Shuang,
- Chaofan Lin,
- Helen Dawes,
- Maedeh Mansoubi,
- Damian Crosby,
- Garry Massey,
- Neil Reeves,
![relevance of the study research paper PLOS](https://journals.plos.org/resource/img/logo-plos.png)
- Published: September 4, 2024
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514
- Peer Review
- Reader Comments
Plantar shear stress may have an important role in the formation of a Diabetic Foot Ulcer, but its measurement is regarded as challenging and has limited research. This paper highlights the importance of anatomical specific shear sensor calibration and presents a feasibility study of a novel shear sensing system which has measured in-shoe shear stress from gait activity on both healthy and diabetic subjects. The sensing insole was based on a strain gauge array embedded in a silicone insole backed with a commercial normal pressure sensor. Sensor calibration factors were investigated using a custom mechanical test rig with indenter to exert both normal and shear forces. Indenter size and location were varied to investigate the importance of both loading area and position on measurement accuracy. The sensing insole, coupled with the calibration procedure, was tested one participant with diabetes and one healthy participant during two sessions of 15 minutes of treadmill walking. Calibration with different indenter areas (from 78.5 mm 2 to 707 mm 2 ) and different positions (up to 40 mm from sensor centre) showed variation in measurements of up to 80% and 90% respectively. Shear sensing results demonstrated high repeatability (>97%) and good accuracy (mean absolute error < ±18 kPa) in bench top mechanical tests and less than 21% variability within walking of 15-minutes duration. The results indicate the importance of mechanical coupling between embedded shear sensors and insole materials. It also highlights the importance of using an appropriate calibration method to ensure accurate shear stress measurement. The novel shear stress measurement system presented in this paper, demonstrates a viable method to measure accurate and repeatable in-shoe shear stress using the calibration procedure described. The validation and calibration methods outlined in this paper could be utilised as a standardised approach for the research community to develop and validate similar measurement technologies.
Citation: Haron AH, Li L, Shuang J, Lin C, Dawes H, Mansoubi M, et al. (2024) In-shoe plantar shear stress sensor design, calibration and evaluation for the diabetic foot. PLoS ONE 19(9): e0309514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514
Editor: Andrea Tigrini, Polytechnic University of Marche: Universita Politecnica delle Marche, ITALY
Received: January 16, 2024; Accepted: August 14, 2024; Published: September 4, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Haron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are available from the Mendeley Data database (DOI 10.17632/pcggh2rzm3.1 ). Only raw anonymised data can be shared due to GDPR restrictions from HRC ethics committee.
Funding: This work was partially funded by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant number EP/W00366X/1.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) affects 15–25% of people with diabetes at some point in their lifetime [ 1 ] and has a high social and economic cost with countries like the UK spending approximately £1 billion annually [ 2 ]. Worldwide the prevalence of diabetes is rising, and it is predicted that 552 million people will have the condition by 2030 [ 3 ]. Measurement of plantar normal stress and plantar shear stress has shown the potential to predict DFU risk [ 4 , 5 ]. However, whilst commercial systems are available to measure normal plantar stress in-shoe there are no commercially available in-shoe plantar shear stress measurement systems. Shear stress has been directly measured during barefoot gait using mechanical sensor arrays coupled with resistive or capacitive sensors [ 6 – 8 ], utilising piezoelectric materials and their charge outputs [ 9 ] and through a variety of optical methods including polycarbonate arrays [ 6 ], optical bend loss [ 7 ] and laser interferometry of bi-refringent films [ 8 ]. Perry et al. [ 10 ] used an array-based device [ 11 ] to study bunching and stretching of adjacent plantar tissue and they found that tissue stretching from shear stress was the predominant mechanism. They report that peak shear stress and peak plantar pressure occur in the same place in 50% of cases, but actually occur at different times, which is contradictory to results reported by other researchers [ 12 ]. Contradictory results are typical from these studies using custom-built shear stress measurement devices due to the relatively low numbers of participants with diabetes tested in the trials, with typical sample sizes of ten. All these measurement methods are bespoke devices and only a handful of foot-to-floor shear stress measurement devices exist worldwide. Larger scale studies with matched control groups are required to provide firm conclusions on plantar surface shear stresses experienced by people with diabetes.
Shear stress measurement is further complicated as all diabetic patients are strongly advised to walk using footwear (and never barefoot), therefore, to understand the shear stresses induced on the plantar surface, in-shoe shear stress measurement must be taken. Although direct shear stress measurement is important in DFU risk management, future use of artificial intelligence methods [ 13 , 14 ] may enable risk management with current measurement technologies.
In-shoe plantar shear stress is difficult to measure and reported measurements vary widely, for example, measurements of shear stress on the 1st metatarsal head varied from 16 kPa [ 15 ] to 140 kPa [ 5 ] in healthy participants. Therefore, either there is widespread inter-participant variability and/or there are mechanisms which cause errors for in-shoe shear stress measurement. Measurement error has been widely reported for in-shoe normal stress systems with causation linked to sensor wear and calibration [ 16 , 17 ]. Specifically, calibrating with similar load ranges to those desired to be measured improved accuracy by up to 20 times [ 16 ] and accuracy was reduced when smaller areas of loading were applied [ 17 ]. It is likely that similar calibration issues will affect in-shoe shear stress sensor measurement accuracy. Researchers have made excellent progress in developing novel in-shoe plantar shear stress measurement systems; however, they have not yet fully considered the implications of calibration methods on measurement accuracy [ 4 , 5 ]. The choice of indenter area of loading, shape and location is also an important consideration for accurate and reliable sensor calibration; despite this, to the authors’ knowledge this has not been investigated and reported in the literature. A key principle in calibration is that the applied loading should be a good representation of the real-world scenario. In the context of plantar foot mechanics, and for example the metatarsal heads, there is variation in the magnitude of loading, area of loading, shape and potentially the location of the bone in relation to the sensor. This paper presents the design and evaluation of an in-shoe shear stress sensor and considers the impact of calibration on measurement accuracy.
This paper describes a sensor system design and conducts a performance investigation. Three investigations were conducted: calibration investigation, loading profile comparison and sensor validation. These investigations and how they relate to one another are shown in Fig 1 .
- PPT PowerPoint slide
- PNG larger image
- TIFF original image
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.g001
Sensor system design
Sensing principle..
Coulomb’s law of friction describes frictional force being proportional to reaction load. In the case of shear sensing insoles this means that there can be no shear stress (friction) without normal stress (reaction load) and that the magnitude of associated shear stress will always be less than that of normal stress. Like most other shear sensors in the literature [ 5 , 15 , 18 – 22 ] the shear sensor is embedded in a hyperelastic or viscoelastic, isotropic incompressible elastomer, as opposed to a discrete sensor placed on the insole or isolated from the main body of the insole material.
Fig 2A shows a cylindrical section of elastomer insole with cross-sectional area, A, containing a strain gauge orientated in the shear plane and a normal stress sensor with sensor readings in mV, S, and N, respectively. The material properties (stress-strain relationship) for the silicone are non-linear but can be approximated as three linear regions (low: ≤ ε 1 = 0.04 strain ; medium: ≤ ε 2 = 0.115 strain ; high: > ε 2 strain ); see Fig 2B . The strains for the three linear regions were determined from the stress-strain curve of the silicone under compressive loading at the target stresses of 14 kPa (low), 70 kPa (medium) and 140 kPa (high). Stress-strain relationships for normal compressive loading are given by Eq 1 , where C medium , and C high are negative intercepts in units of pascal ( C low = 0) and E is the gradient in Pascal.
[A] Cylindrical section of elastomer containing strain gauge and normal force sensor [B] Stress-strain curve of the elastomer under compression stress. Linear approximations for deformation were made for three regions of the curve (low, medium, and high stress magnitudes), sectioned by the compressive strains ε 1 and ε 2 , with corresponding gradient E used for calibration. [C] Cylindrical section deformed by normal force only. [D] Cylindrical section deformed by both normal and shear forces.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.g002
Fig 2C shows the section being loaded with a normal force which creates a reduction in thickness but an increase in diameter described by Eq 2 (assuming constant volume) which gives sensor readings S N and N N , which are signal voltage measurements (mV) for the shear stress and normal stress respectively, described by Eqs 3 and 4 where k N and k S are constants (sensor gains) determined by experiment with units Pa/mV and strain/mV respectively (other equation parameters defined in Fig 2 with SI units).
Fig 2D shows applied loading from both normal and shear force giving a sensor reading S N + S and N N for the shear stress and normal stress respectively. The applied shear stress, σ S , can be determined from Eq 5 and Eq 1 (assuming an isotropic material) which requires measurements from the normal stress sensor, N N , to decouple the effect on the strain gauge from normal force (where i = low , medium or high ).
Shear stress sensor design.
The shear stress sensing system primarily consists of the strain gauge rosette, a normal stress sensor, and the flexion stiffener and load concentrator; here on in referred to as the ‘shear stress system sensor’ or ‘SSS sensor’. A 3-element strain measuring rosette (1-RY81-3/120, Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer UK Ltd, Royston, England) was chosen for the shear stress sensor ( Fig 3A ) arranged in rectangular 0°-45°-90° directions to allow for calculation of resultant shear in both the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions. The sensor was then embedded in silicone (Sil A50 Smooth- Sil Addition Cure silicone, Smooth-On Inc. Macungie, USA). To assemble the sensor, the first 2mm silicone base layer was poured into a custom 3D printed square mould with dimensions of 20 x 20 x 4 mm (width x length x height). After curing the surface was cleaned and the strain gauges were soldered to 2-core 2.8 mm 2 external diameter shielded wires (JY-1060, Pro-Power by Newark, Chicago, USA). The strain gauges were then placed on the surface of the silicone using a custom 3D printed jig with tabs and bolts to align the strain gauges in the correct angular position. A thin second layer of silicone (approximately 0.5 mm thick) was then poured and allowed to fully cure, the jig was then removed and a final layer of silicone was poured on top to give a total thickness of 4 mm. A 15 mm diameter, 0.8 mm thick phenolic sheet material flexion stiffener and load concentrator was placed at the center of the sensor assembly and the top layer of silicone was then allowed to cure. The full assembly of the sensor is shown in Fig 3B and 3C .
[A] Configuration of the strain rosette in the sensor with three strain gauges arranged at 0°– 45° - 90°, and the relationship between the local strain axes and the global applied shear direction axes (Medial-Lateral, ML, and Anterior-Posterior, AP). [B] Section view of the SSS sensor. [C] Top view of the SSS sensor and its dimensions. [D] Locations of SSS sensors in the sensing insole.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.g003
As mentioned in the sensing principle, the shear stress is obtained from Eq 5 , however, for the SSS sensor to measure both AP and ML shear stress, orientation of the strain gauges needs to be considered. From the configuration shown in Fig 3A for stress measurements calculated from strain gauges A, B and C the shear stress is given by Eqs 6 and 7 .
Where θ AB and θ BC are the angles between the individual strain gauges in the rosette, which were at 45°.
Shear stress sensor number, placement, and integration.
Key DFU risk areas, accounting for at more than one-third of DFU cases are the calcaneus, first metatarsal head and hallux areas of the foot [ 23 – 26 ], so placement of the SSS sensors in the insole was in these three locations. To maximize accuracy of the measured sensing data, all sensors were anatomically matched to the participant. This was achieved through a ‘palpation and marking paper’ approach in which a healthcare professional identified the bony landmarks of the foot, marked these areas on the foot surface with skin-safe marker, and the participant stands on the paper to transfer the markings. These markings were then used to ensure SSS sensors were correctly located on the silicone insole, with the sensor x-axis aligned with the anterior posterior direction. The signal wires were laid out from the SSS sensor in the ML direction to reduce fatigue loading from flexion during gait. A 1–2 mm depth of silicone was then poured and cured before a further layer of silicone was poured and cured to make a total insole thickness of 5 mm to complete the insole, as shown in Fig 3D . Three normal stress sensors (A301 FlexiForce 0-44N, Tekscan Inc., Norwood, Massachusetts, USA) were then secured to the bottom of the insole with silicone glue (Permatex 80050 Clear RTV Silicone Adhesive Sealant, Permatex, Illinois Tool Works Inc., Solon, Ohio, USA) with their center coincident with the SSS sensors.
Data acquisition system (DAQ) and signal processing.
A Teensy 4.1 32-bit microcontroller (PJRC, Portland, Oregon, USA), ARM Cortex-M7 processor, with clock speed of 600 MHz and integrated SD storage card, was used to collect and store the voltage readings from the SSS sensors ( Fig 4B ). Flexiforce normal stress sensors were connected via a 10 kOhm circuit divider to analog inputs, whilst shear sensing strain gauges were amplified using a 24-bit high-precision analog-to-digital amplifier (HX711 ADC, HALJIA, Zhongai, China) then routed to digital inputs of the microcontroller. All signals were collected at a sampling rate of 80 Hz. Data was logged to the 16GB SD card and streamed via an ESP8266 UART WiFi adapter (Espressif Systems, Shanghai, China) to allow for continuous monitoring. Power was supplied to all components via 3V and 5V power rails from the microcontroller, sourced from an external 3.7V 3500mAh Lithium Polymer battery (LP104567, EEMB, Moscow, Russian Federation) that was regulated through a linear regulator (LDO, B08HQQ32M2, DollaTek, Hong Kong, China). For both left and right foot measurements, two identical systems were used to collect the measurements, and placed on a custom, adjustable neoprene fitness belt (Frienda, China), during walking trials ( Fig 4 ).
[A] Participant walking on a treadmill with the sensor insole system. The data acquisition system (DAQ) was attached to a belt, and each insole (left and right foot) has a separate but identical DAQ input. [B] Block diagram of the DAQ system, collecting data at 80 Hz.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.g004
A custom MATLAB (The Mathworks Inc., Natick Massachusetts, USA) script was used to parse and analyse the data collected. The data was minimally pre-processed before finalized into calibrated stress measurements. This pre-processing stage included removing only obvious outliers (which accounted for up to 0.05% of the measurement data if present). This was made using the filloutlier function with the ‘quartile’ outlier detection option: ‘quartiles’ outliers which were elements more than 1.5 interquartile ranges above the upper quartile (75 percent) or below the lower quartile (25 percent)) and correcting DC offsets. Data from each foot were analyzed separately.
Calibration investigation: Bench top mechanical testing
Experimental setup and test method..
To investigate the effect of calibration on the sensor’s performance, both shear and normal force were applied to the SSS sensor insole (summarised in Fig 1A ). A uniaxial mechanical testing machine (Instron 5982K2680 100kN 350°C, 500N load cell, Instron ® Norwood, Massachusetts, USA) applied and measured shear force using a bespoke shear stress rig through an indenter of area, A, shown in Fig 5A . A normal reaction force was applied through a screw thread to the indenter to facilitate frictional shear stress application. Measurement of normal reaction force was through a load cell and ADC (ADN1903027, 196.2 N Weight Sensor Load Cell, Haljia, China) capturing data at 80Hz using an Arduino (Arduino Mega 2560 Rev3, Arduino, Somerville, MA, USA). For pure normal stress loading calibration, the insole was placed flat on a plate in the uniaxial testing machine fitted with a large compression platen on the bottom and an indenter with a specific area, A, applying compression force from the top, shown in Fig 5B .
[A] Custom shear stress rig made of rigid 10 mm acrylic sheet plates which applied the force of the mechanical testing machine as a shear force onto the insole. The shear stress was calculated using the applied force and area of the custom indenter. The indenter’s compressive stiffness was 30.1 MPa, ~12 times stiffer than the silicone sensor of 2.5 MPa. [B] Custom normal stress calibration setup where the insole was placed on a compression platen.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.g005
Sensor loading area investigation.
To evaluate the effect of indenter area, A, five flat ended cylindrical indenters with diameters of, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 mm were used to load the SSS sensor at its center. While studies have shown that there is a difference between various indenter shape loading profiles and the corresponding mechanical responses of the material [ 27 , 28 ], we determined that the normal stress distribution that was measured at the surface of the SSS sensor was similar for both flat and rounded indenter profiles. The only notable difference was the size of the normal stress distribution, as a flat indenter covered a larger area than the rounded indenter of the same diameter. Thus, choosing a flat indenter of a smaller size gave the same loading results as a larger rounded indenter.
The tests applied a cyclic shear force with a 1 Hz triangular waveform pattern ranging from 0 to 50 N in combination with a constant normal stress of 140 kPa through all the indenters. SSS Sensor output signal, S N + S , in mV was measured for each of the loading areas.
Sensor loading location investigation.
Ideally a sensor would be co-located with the anatomical part applying the load, however, this may not always be practically possible so an understanding of the relationship between the location of the SSS sensor, the location of the applied loading and the accuracy of measurement is required. To investigate the effect of loading location, twelve loading locations were chosen, six in the anterior direction and six in the lateral direction both measuring 0, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 mm from the center of the shear stress sensor. Loads were applied in both the medial or posterior direction respectively. Cyclic loading was applied to the SSS sensor insole of the same characteristic as the area of loading investigation (see ‘Sensing loading area investigation’ section). SSS Sensor output signal, S N + S , in mV was measured for each of the loading locations.
Loading profile comparison: Human plantar loading specific sensor calibration
Comparison of normal stress profiles..
Shear loading application area and location affect strain measurements, so it is important to consider plantar stress loading from the human foot. During walking plantar stress is dependent on many factors including foot size and anatomy, weight, morbidity and walking patterns, all of which are different between participants. From the sensor calibration investigations in the results section, we can see that (i) loading location and (ii) loading area may affect the output of the SSS sensor so these must be considered during calibration.
- Loading location variation can be removed by placing the SSS sensors at personalised anatomical locations in the insole, which is the approach we have taken.
- Loading area variation can be controlled through calibration. This was determined through a comparison and matching of normal stress loading profiles of the specific participant’s foot anatomy with bench top mechanical test experiments involving various loading area sizes (flat cylindrical indenters).
To capture the plantar normal stress loading profiles of our participants, in the SSS sensor locations of the calcaneus, first metatarsal head and the hallux, we conducted measurements in-shoe during a two-minute treadmill walk using an F-scan insole (Tekscan Inc., Boston, USA) coupled with a non-instrumented insole of the same material properties and thickness as our designed insole. Then the test rig ( Fig 4B ) was used with 15, 20, 30 and 40 mm diameter indenter sizes to load the silicone insole from 0 to 250 N (to simulate a normal stress range up to 1400 kPa, which is comparable to the 1000–1900 kPa normal plantar stresses during gait reported in the literature [ 29 , 30 ].
Measurements of plantar normal stress distribution were captured with the same F-scan and insole used with the participants. To simulate the different foot structures, we adjusted the diameter of cylindrical indenters (15, 20, 30 and 40 mm), which were based on the ranges of average anatomical dimensions of the hallux, metatarsal head, and calcaneus bones [ 31 – 36 ], see results and discussion ‘Human plantar loading consideration for sensor calibration’ section. An illustrated summary of this investigation can also be found in Fig 1B .
Statistical analysis as a method for calibration indenter choice.
Comparisons were made between the participant’s mean normal stress profiles with the bench top test rig results (gait data averaged over 20 gait cycles from three different sensing locations hallux, first metatarsal head, and calcaneus, bench top test rig results for 15, 20, 30 and 40 mm indenter diameters). Magnitudes of both results were scaled to have a maximum unity magnitude to enable comparison. The normal stress profiles (normal stress vs displacement across anatomical location) were collected along a 2D cross section of 40 mm in length across the foot-width of loaded area (see results and discussion ‘Human plantar loading consideration for sensor calibration’ section). Calibration indenter diameters for the hallux, first metatarsal head and calcaneus locations were chosen based on either the highest R 2 value from a multiple linear regression between the gait measures and the test rig measures or the maximum measurement sensitivity area of the SSS sensor (see results and discussion ‘Sensor calibration’ section).
Sensor validation: Bench top mechanical testing
The following section describes the sensor validation, as summarised in Fig 1C . A 30 mm diameter indenter was used to calibrate the SSS sensor, as this was determined to be the maximum sensing area of the sensor (see results and discussion ‘Sensor calibration’ section). This was achieved through a series of mechanical tests detailed in Table 1 , with shear stresses applied in both ML and AP directions and conducted at 1Hz, to simulate average walking speed frequency.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.t001
The shear stress magnitudes chosen for low, medium, and high levels were 10%, 50% and 100% of the 140 kPa maximum in-shoe plantar shear stress reported in the literature respectively [ 37 ]. This enabled calculation of the calibration parameters coefficients E low , E high , C medium and C high , according to Eq 1 .
To validate the calibrated SSS sensor, a shear stress of 70 kPa with a normal stress of 125 kPa was applied in both the ML and AP direction at 0.8 Hz. Additionally, a shear stress was also applied in the 45° direction (14 kPa shear stress, 28 kPa normal stress at 1Hz).
Two measurements of error were made. The first was an overall mean absolute error (MAE), which is the mean of the difference between the measurement from the test rig and the calibrated SSS sensor measurement (in kPa). The second was peak error, measured as the percentage error at peak loads between the applied measurement from the test rig and the calibrated SSS sensor measurement. Peak values of measured shear stress were taken from 10 cycles and a standard deviation was calculated. Repeatability was calculated from the SSS sensor measurements as the standard deviation of the peak plantar stresses divided by the mean of the peak plantar stress, presented as percentage (e.g. a mean peak measurement of 100 kPa and a standard deviation of those peak measurements at ± 10 kPa, would result in (10/100) x 100% = 10% deviation from the peak value, and thus 90% repeatability).
Sensor validation: Gait lab treadmill walking
To further validate the sensors, a gait laboratory treadmill walking test was performed on a single anthropometrically matched healthy participant and a single participant with diabetes (both male and 45 years old, weighing 88 kg and 75 kg, height of 1.75 and 1.66 m, EU shoe size 44 and 42, weight per insole area 32 kPa and 35 kPa, walking speed 0.92 ms -1 and 0.95 ms -1 for the healthy participant and participant with diabetes respectively). The study received approval from the NHS Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) Ethics Committee (REC reference: 22/NW/0216), and all participants provided written consent. Trial Registration number: NCT05865353. Participants were recruited between 1 st November 2022 till 30 th May 2023. Data collection was conducted in two parts (1) baseline visit and (2) main data collection, Table 2 .
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.t002
Baseline visit.
Anthropometric data was collected, and anatomical landmarks determined using the ‘palpation and marking paper’ method described in the ‘Shear stress sensor number, placement and integration’ section. The participants conducted a 2 minute treadmill walk while wearing a pair of silicone insoles, made from the same materials and dimensions as the sensor insole but without active sensors, and a pair of F-Scan pressure sensing insoles, in a prophylactic shoe (Sponarind 97308, Finn Comfort Inc. Hassfurt, Bavaria, Germany), designed with shock-absorbing properties and a larger volume, ideal for people with diabetes. Normal stress data was collected using the F-scan insoles, at a self-selected gait speed to determine normal plantar stress profiles (results of which were used for the comparison of normal stress profiles, in ‘Human plantar loading specific sensor calibration’ section). Table 2 shows the participant data collected during the baseline visit.
Main data collection.
The participants returned for the main data collection where they were asked to wear the sensing insole in the specialist diabetic shoe. They then walked twice on a split belt treadmill with integrated force plates (M-Gait, Motek Medical BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands) for 15 minutes at their self-selected speed (see Table 2 ).
Data analysis: Shear stress gait measures and repeatability.
Mean and standard deviation of peak shear stress and peak normal stress measurements were extracted from 20 gait cycles measured by the sensing insole. Measurement repeatability was determined and comparisons, between the two walking periods within each individual walking session (start, middle, and end). We collected statistical data for both plantar shear stress and normal stress measurements to perform inter-participant comparisons. These included statistics for Plantar Stresses (Normal, AP Shear, and ML Shear) across all three sensor areas, encompassing mean values, standard deviations, peak stresses, and variability (or percentage difference) of measurements within the 15-minute treadmill walk (intra-walk) and between two treadmill walks (inter-walk).
Results and discussion
Sensor calibration.
Shear stress measurement accuracy is affected by the calibration method. Specifically, the shear stress sensor measured output signal decreases exponentially with both increasing loading application area, and increasing loading distance away from sensor center, see Fig 6 . The results in Fig 6A show that the measured output decreases by ~80% from 1.5 mV to 0.3 mV, for a calibration loading application area of 10 mm diameter to 30 mm diameter respectively. This means that if the sensor was calibrated for the smaller 10 mm area and a larger 30 mm diameter load was applied, the measurements would be underestimated by 80%. Likewise, calibrating for a larger area, and applying load for a small area will greatly overestimate the measurements. Increasing the loading application area increases the area over which the force is distributed over the sensor, thus more of the loading is applied away from the center of the shear stress sensor. From the results shown in Fig 6B and 6C the location of loading application also reduces sensor sensitivity. All this means that the shear stress sensor will only be able to measure accurately if the calibration loading area matches the desired measurement loading application area (or are reasonable similar areas).
Mean peak signal of shear stress (SSS sensor) total output (mV) from 10 cyclic triangular loading. [A]—Effect of area of loading on SSS sensor measured outputs. [B, C]- Effect of location of loading on SSS sensor output for medial and posterior respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.g006
Fig 6B and 6C show the influence of loading location on SSS sensor measurements for the same applied loading area (25 mm diameter indenter). As expected, the SSS sensor measurement for both Anterior-Posterior (AP) and Medial-Lateral (ML) shear loading decreased as the loading distance moved away from the sensor center. This is due to a decrease in deformation of the shear stress sensor as the loading is applied further away from the sensor center. However, it is important to note that there was still a measurable signal at these distances as they are not yet relatively far away from the sensor. This means that measured shear stress from an embedded sensor will not just be from the coincident anatomical location but also have a contribution from adjacent and other relatively close anatomies (e.g. first metatarsal head located sensor may be measuring shear stress contribution from the second metatarsal head). This is due to material coupling, which is that stress applied in one area of the material, in this case the silicone insole, will stress surrounding areas of the material. The implication is that the shear stress sensor will provide more accurate measurements if the loading application location is coincident with the centre of the sensor. This emphasizes the importance of the placement of these discrete sensors, which is why a participant specific sensing insole was manufactured, placing sensors at the exact anatomical location of the boney landmarks, where peak loading is expected.
Although this paper presents the shear stress sensor sensitivities to calibration loading area and calibration loading locations for this sensor it is likely that these observations are true for other embedded in-shoe shear stress sensors. Other researchers measured in-shoe peak shear stresses from gait varied from 9 kPa to 140 kPa and calibration loading area varied from 20 mm diameter area (314 mm 2 ) –10,000 mm 2 (up to half the insole, approximated from the experimental Fig 3 in the paper as there was insufficient detail to give conclusive information on the loading area used) [ 5 , 15 ]. It is likely that these variations in measurements are not due to inherent sensor inaccuracy or participant gait differences but likely to stem from calibration method differences. To the authors’ knowledge, calibration loading area has not been investigated in other published studies, but it is suggested that calibration should be considered for all future in-shoe shear stress measurements.
Human plantar loading consideration for sensor calibration
Fig 7 shows that calibration loading indenter diameters should be 20 mm and 40 mm for the hallux and both the first metatarsal head and the calcaneus respectively. However, due to limitations on sensor sensitivity beyond 30 mm from the center of the sensor a 30 mm indenter diameter was chosen for the first metatarsal head and calcaneus. These choices of calibration indenter diameters were determined from the comparison of the bench top testing normal stress profiles of different indenter diameters, with the participants’ measured normal stress profile during walking. The bench top test showed that all the indenters resulted in normally distributed normal stress profile curves ( Fig 7A ), increasing in curve width with increasing indenter diameters, reflecting a larger contact area of the applied force. An increasing curve width is also expected for the normal stress profiles of anatomical bones with increasing diameters (first metatarsal head ~15 mm, hallux ~20 mm, and calcaneus ~ 40 mm [ 31 – 36 , 38 ]). The participants’ measured normal stress for the hallux and the calcaneus regions of the foot had normal pressure distribution profiles that reflected their anatomical sizes, however, the presence of the second close metatarsal bone influenced the normal stress profile in the first metatarsal head area and widened the normal stress profile, more than what is expected from its anatomical diameter of ~15 mm ( Fig 7B ). The R 2 results of the multiple linear regression reflected this ( Fig 7C ), as the first metatarsal head correlates to the indenter size of 40 mm diameter. The R 2 value of the metatarsal head, however, is small at 0.41, indicating that there may be variability in the pressure distributions in that area, likely from gait variability within a participant’s walk or between participants. The hallux and calcaneus regions of the foot have a normal pressure distribution profile that reflects the loading of the anatomical bones clearly (R 2 ≥ 0.95) and can be matched with an indenter of a similar size to give a representative loading for calibration of 20 mm and 40 mm respectively. However, loading area results from Fig 6A show that sensor sensitivity converges for indenter areas greater than 25–30 mm diameter. Therefore, calibration indenter diameters were reduced to 30 mm for the first metatarsal head and calcaneus.
[A] Experimental normal pressure profiles: (i) Indenter experimental setup, (ii) Normal pressure profile curves width increases with increasing indenter diameter, (iii) F-scan pressure result that shows the cross section used to obtain these values used in ii. [B] Participant pressure profiles: (i) In-shoe gait lab experimental setup (ii) An example of participant’s pressure profile over 20 gait cycles, showing the three normal pressure profiles of the foot at the calcaneus, first met head and hallux, (iii) F-scan pressure result that shows the cross section used to obtain the values. The image also shows the peaks for these three regions (Calcaneus peak CP, Hallux Peak HP and the metatarsal peaks MHP1 and MHP2). [C] Graphical representation of the regression analysis’ coefficient of determination (or R-squared) results. Larger circles indicate a higher R-squared value, and red circles indicate the maximum R-squared in the sensor group. R-squared values are shown above the circles, and maximum is indicated as red font.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.g007
The implications of this for the SSS sensor are that calibration indenter sizes should be between 10–30 mm dependent on expected shear stress application areas. This finding is likely to be true for other embedded in-shoe shear stress sensors in the literature. The limitation from this finding is that to obtain accurate shear stress measurements the user must know something about the shear stress loading profile which may be unknown. A possible way to mitigate for this may be to calibrate the sensor for a range of loading areas and to use a normal stress sensor to determine which indenter calibration area to use in post-processing.
Shear sensor calibration and bench top mechanical test validation
The SSS sensor was highly accurate and repeatable when compared against the bench top mechanical test as seen in Fig 8 . Results from Table 3 show that calibration error was insignificant with the mean absolute error (MAE) over the entire cycle in calibration < 0.00007 kPa for all magnitudes of loading, and errors at peak loading were < 5.8%.
[A] Sensor calibration for both anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions at a ‘medium’ level of posterior and medial shear loading of 1 Hz cyclic loading of up to 70 kPa shear stress, at a constant normal stress of 140 kPa. [B] Sensor validation test result at medium level of shear cyclic loading (up to 70 kPa), at a different loading frequency (~0.85 Hz) and different constant normal stress (125kPa). All results for the different configurations of loading are shown in Table 3 .
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.g008
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.t003
The errors in the validation of the sensors at loading conditions different from the calibration were higher, but still showed a high accuracy for the sensors. The sensor was most accurate for low–medium shear stress magnitudes with up to <1.8 kPa for MAE, and < 8.7% for error at peak loading (see example of medium magnitude measurements in Fig 8 ). Followed by the measurements at a resultant loading angle of 45° clockwise from the anterior direction (MAE <1.4 kPa; <11.5% peak error). These small errors could be attributed to errors in the validation setup, as an error of ± 5° would correspond to a peak shear stress error of up to 4.6%. The SSS sensor also showed good repeatability for all loading conditions (>97% repeatability in calibration and >96% repeatability in validation).
The highest errors in validation were at high shear stress magnitudes, over the expected plantar shear stress from gait, these were MAE <17.3 kPa and peak error <22.4%. This was likely due to the mechanical coupling of the high normal stress, pushing the total material deformation higher up the hyperelastic stress-strain curve of the sensor material ( Fig 2D ). At this region of the stress-strain curve, very small strains relate to high changes in stress making the SSS sensor more prone to measurement errors. However, the maximum errors translate to an error of ± 31.3 kPa, which is within the standard deviation of most plantar stress measurements from the literature of ± 50 kPa for shear stress [ 1 – 5 , 15 ].
Treadmill walking validation
For treadmill walking the SSS sensors measured the magnitude of shear stresses between 66.5 kPa—152.6 kPa in the AP direction, and 28.4 kPa– 128 kPa in the ML direction, full results are shown in Table 4 . As expected, the ML shear range was lower than the AP shear range, as loading was expected to be predominantly in the AP direction. Loads were cyclic going from zero to peak value with the same frequency as gait which were at speeds of 0.92 and 0.95ms -1 for the healthy participant and participant with diabetes respectively. The only notable differences were in the direction of some of the peak plantar shear stresses.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309514.t004
No significant differences between both participants peak plantar stress values were observed (t-test of mean peak plantar stresses PPS, p>0.36, p>0.58 and p>0.57). This was expected, as both participants had a similar walking speed (0.92–0.95 ms -1 , and weight per insole area 32.4–35 kPa). However, this study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility, accuracy, and repeatability of the SSS system so no conclusions should be drawn on plantar stress for general people with diabetes and healthy populations for this study.
The shear measurements of the SSS sensor was highly repeatable when comparing data recorded for both within the 15-minute treadmill walk (intra-walk), and between the two 15-minute walks (inter-walk). The mean and standard deviation of the percentage difference of peak plantar stresses were ≤ 8% ± 6% for both investigations. Intra-walk differences were lower than inter-walk–with the highest percentage difference of 21% measured by the SSS sensor for the ML Shear (Hallux, Left foot, participant with diabetes). Other measurements from the shear stress sensors were < 15% difference. For inter-walk, the highest PPS percentage difference was measured by the commercial Flexiforce sensor of 47% difference in normal stress (Hallux, left foot, participant with diabetes), followed by 37% for the AP shear of the SSS sensor (Hallux, right, healthy) and 33% for the ML shear of the SSS sensor (Calcaneus, right, participant with diabetes).
Calibration and material coupling for shear stress sensors
To the author’s knowledge, this study is the first to address in-shoe shear sensing material coupling and unexplored complexities in calibration for shear sensing. The results illustrate that due to sensor and material coupling with adjacent structures the area which contributes to the measured shear can be larger than the area of the sensor. This has important implications for shear sensor calibration, firstly in terms of the location of the sensor and the anatomical region that is to be measured, and secondly in terms of the indenter area used for calibration. These results have significance for all researchers developing systems to measure in-shoe plantar shear stress as these factors will affect the magnitude of shear sensed. Furthermore, these results may partially explain the variation in magnitudes of shear measured at the same anatomical locations by different researchers. A suggested approach for shear sensor calibration is shown below (for detail see methods ‘Human plantar loading specific sensor calibration’ section):
- Determine the sensing area : Material coupling between the shear sensor and adjacent regions can result in the area sensed being greater than then actual area of the sensor.
- Determine the distribution of plantar loading : Normal stress distribution will be indicative of shear stress distribution, whilst foot anatomy, for example the hallux, will determine the loading area.
- Decision for calibration indenter area : Informed by both the sensing area and the distribution and magnitude of plantar loading.
Developed shear stress system sensor
Sensor performance..
A novel Shear Stress System (SSS) sensor composed of a strain gauge rosette, normal pressure sensor and stiffener to concentrate loading at the desired sensor location and mitigate against material coupling was developed and evaluated. Sensor locations were anatomically matched and measured the plantar loading profiles to inform calibration of each sensor at a specific location. This study conducted a thorough experimental validation of the shear sensor through mechanical bench top testing and with human participant treadmill walking. Shear sensing results demonstrated high repeatability (>97%) and high accuracy in the expected measurement range for plantar shear stress (mean absolute errors < ±2 kPa) with error increasing for very high shear stresses (mean absolute errors < ±17 kPa) compared to bench top mechanical tests and repeatability for treadmill walking of 15-minutes duration with less than 21% variability within walking, and less than 37% variability between walks (which was lower than the commercial normal pressure sensors of 47% used in this study).
Limitations.
A rosette strain gauge was chosen for determining unknown principal directions, however it restricted complete strain separation in the AP and ML directions. For exclusive separation, a 0°–90° strain gauge in the ML and AP axes could be adopted. The manual assembly of the sensors and alignment of the sensor in relation to the AP and ML directions affect shear measurement. This has been controlled through careful manufacture, but some small errors will remain. The chosen alignment of the strain gauge rosette in the ML direction was to reduce the fatigue on the soldered joints, this resulted in a decreased sensitivity in the AP direction due to the 45° off-alignment of the gauges with this axis.
Relative stiffness of the silicone and the strain gauge rosette will affect strain transfer between the two materials. Material properties of the silicone is highly important for measurement accuracy, sensitivity, and range, and warrants further investigation.
Future work.
A three-part linear fitting procedure was adopted to calibrate the SSS sensor accommodating the hyperelastic material properties, in the future consideration of alternative fits to capture viscoelastic effects could be made. Despite observing minimal shear sensor temperature response, variability between 20–30°C, literature indicates foot temperatures may be as high as 35° in people with diabetes [ 39 , 40 ], this should be considered in the future. In this proof-of-concept study, the size of calibration area was based on average pressure profiles, a suitable assumption with little participant variation. However, future larger studies may require participant-specific calibration to address varying loading profiles, particularly due to gait variability.
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
- 22. Amemiya A, Noguchi H, Oe M, Sanada H, Mori T. Establishment of a measurement method for in-shoe pressure and shear stress in specific regions for diabetic ulcer prevention. 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE; 2016.
Information
- Author Services
Initiatives
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
- Active Journals
- Find a Journal
- Proceedings Series
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- For Editors
- For Librarians
- For Publishers
- For Societies
- For Conference Organizers
- Open Access Policy
- Institutional Open Access Program
- Special Issues Guidelines
- Editorial Process
- Research and Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charges
- Testimonials
- Preprints.org
- SciProfiles
- Encyclopedia
![Applied Sciences applsci-logo](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/journals/applsci-logo.png?8600e93ff98dbf14)
Article Menu
![relevance of the study research paper relevance of the study research paper](https://www.mdpi.com/profiles/2250/thumb/Luis_Javier_García_Villalba.png)
- Subscribe SciFeed
- Recommended Articles
- Google Scholar
- on Google Scholar
- Table of Contents
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
JSmol Viewer
A study of friction nonlinearity and compensation for turntable servo systems.
![relevance of the study research paper relevance of the study research paper](https://www.mdpi.com/bundles/mdpisciprofileslink/img/unknown-user.png)
1. Introduction
2. friction modeling and identification, 2.1. friction modeling, 2.2. friction parameter identification, 2.2.1. introduction to the identification algorithm.
- Randomly initialize the particle population’s initial positions and velocities within the range of dynamic parameters, with a population size of M = 100 and a maximum identification number of 500.
- Evaluate the fitness of each particle, update the personal best and global best values, and retain relatively better parameter identification results.
- Update the particle positions and velocities, forming new identification parameters.
- Repeat iterations until reaching the maximum number of identifications, and select the particle corresponding to the global extremum as the best identification value.
2.2.2. Parameter Identification Experiment
3. compensation based on the friction model, 3.1. feedforward compensation based on the friction model, 3.2. friction compensation based on extended state observer, 4. simulation and experimental validation of friction compensation, 4.1. simulation and experimental validation, 4.2. discussion of simulation and experiment, 5. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
- Yu, H.; Gao, H.; Deng, H.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, L. Synchronization Control with Adaptive Friction Compensation of Treadmill-based Testing Apparatus for Wheeled Planetary Rover. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2022 , 69 , 592–603. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Véronneau, C.; Denis, J.; Lhommeau, P.; St-Jean, A.; Girard, A.; Plante, J.S.; Bigué, J.P.L. Modular Magnetorheological Actuator with High Torque Density and Transparency for the Collaborative Robot Industry. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2023 , 8 , 896–903. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Thenozhi, S.; Concha, A.; Resendiz, J.R. A Contraction Theory-based Tracking Control Design with Friction Identification and Compensation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2022 , 69 , 6111–6120. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Qian, X.; Peiliang, W.; Zuxin, L. Parameter identification of permanent magnet servo system based on recursive least squares method. J. Electrotechnol. 2016 , 31 , 9. [ Google Scholar ]
- Liu, C.; Luo, G.; Duan, X.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Qiu, C. Adaptive LADRC-Based Disturbance Rejection Method for Electromechanical Servo System. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2020 , 56 , 876–889. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Zhou, Z.; Guo, R. A Disturbance-Observer-Based Feedforward-Feedback Control Strategy for Driveline Launch Oscillation of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Considering Nonlinear Backlash. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022 , 71 , 3727–3735. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Wang, G.; Liu, R.; Zhao, N.; Ding, D.; Xu, D. Enhanced linear ADRC strategy for HF pulse voltage signal injection based sensorless IPMSM drives. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2019 , 34 , 514–525. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Liang, L.H.; Wang, L.Y.; Wang, J.F. Energy-Saving Nonlinear Friction Compensation Method for Direct Drive Volume Control Flange-Type Rotary Vane Steering Gear. IEEE Access 2019 , 7 , 148351–148362. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Papadopoulos, E.G.; Chasparis, G.C. A Novel Friction Compensation Method Based on Stribeck Model With Fuzzy Filter for PMSM Servo Systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2023 , 70 , 12124–12133. [ Google Scholar ]
- Ahi, B.; Nobakhti, A. Hardware Implementation of an ADRC Controller on a Gimbal Mechanism. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2018 , 26 , 2268–2275. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Song, Z.; Mei, X.; Jiang, G. Inertia Identification based on Model Reference Adaptive System with Variable Gain for AC Servo Systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Takamatsu, Japan, 6–9 August 2017; pp. 188–192. [ Google Scholar ]
- Ren, C.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; Ma, S. Extended State Observer based Sliding Mode Control of an Omnidirectional Mobile Robot with Friction Compensation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019 , 66 , 9480–9489. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Ming, M.; Liang, W.; Ling, J.; Feng, Z.; Al Mamun, A.; Xiao, X. Composite Integral Sliding Mode Control with Neural Network-based Friction Compensation for a Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Motor. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), Singapore, 18–21 October 2020; pp. 4397–4402. [ Google Scholar ]
- Tian, Y.-C.; Huang, S.; Liang, W.; Tan, K.K. Intelligent friction compensation: A review. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2019 , 24 , 1763–1774. [ Google Scholar ]
- Cui, N.; Zhang, Q.; Li, G. Servo rotary table friction modelling and compensation based on switching system theory. Micromotor 2019 , 52 , 6. [ Google Scholar ]
- Sun, L.; Li, X.; Chen, L.; Shi, H.; Jiang, Z. Dual-Motor Coordination for High-Quality Servo with Transmission Backlash. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2023 , 70 , 1182–1196. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Xue, Y.; Li, D.; Li, Z. Design of linear self-immunity controller for high-order large-inertia systems. Control Decis. 2023 , 38 , 999–1007. [ Google Scholar ]
- Yang, M.; Ni, Q.; Liu, X.; Xu, D. Vibration suppression and over-quadrant error mitigation methods for a ball-screw driven servo system with dual-position feedback. IEEE Access 2020 , 8 , 213758–213771. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Beerens, R.; Bisoffi, A.; Zaccarian, L.; Nijmeijer, H.; Heemels, M.; van de Wouw, N. Reset PID design for motion systems with Stribeck friction. IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol. 2022 , 30 , 294–310. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Yang, M.; Qu, W.Y.; Chen, Y.Y. Online inertia identification of servo system based on variable period recursive least squares and Kalman observer. J. Electrotechnol. 2018 , 33 , 367–376. [ Google Scholar ]
- Bu, F.; Yang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Pan, Z.; Pu, T.; Degano, M.; Gerada, C. Speed Ripple Reduction of Direct-Drive PMSM Servo System at Low-Speed Operation Using Virtual Cogging Torque Control Method. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2021 , 68 , 160–174. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
Click here to enlarge figure
Number of Experiments | Current Iq (A) | (Nm) | (Nm) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.051 | 0.041 | 0.043 |
2 | 0.057 | 0.046 | |
3 | 0.048 | 0.038 | |
4 | 0.069 | 0.055 | |
5 | 0.050 | 0.040 | |
6 | 0.049 | 0.039 | |
7 | 0.053 | 0.042 |
Experimental Trials | Coulomb Friction Torque, Tc (Nm) | Viscous Friction Coefficient, Bv (Nm/(rad/s)) |
---|---|---|
1 | ||
2 | ||
Average value |
Parameter | Numerical Value |
---|---|
Rated power (W) | 750 |
Rated current (A) | 3 |
Rated torque (Nm) | 2.39 |
Number of pole pairs | 5 |
) |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Share and Cite
Yan, M.; Liu, K.; Sohel, R.M.; Ji, R.; Ye, H. A Study of Friction Nonlinearity and Compensation for Turntable Servo Systems. Appl. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 8002. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14178002
Yan M, Liu K, Sohel RM, Ji R, Ye H. A Study of Friction Nonlinearity and Compensation for Turntable Servo Systems. Applied Sciences . 2024; 14(17):8002. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14178002
Yan, Minjie, Kai Liu, Rana Md Sohel, Runze Ji, and Hairong Ye. 2024. "A Study of Friction Nonlinearity and Compensation for Turntable Servo Systems" Applied Sciences 14, no. 17: 8002. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14178002
Article Metrics
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
![MDPI Open Access Journals MDPI](https://pub.mdpi-res.com/img/design/mdpi-pub-logo-white-small.png?71d18e5f805839ab?1725614580)
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
- DOI: 10.55041/ijsrem28211
- Corpus ID: 267048425
A Case Study on the Impact of Brand Image on Customer Buying Behaviour with Special Reference to Nilgiris Supermarket in Mangalore
- Harish S. Pai
- Published in INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF… 15 January 2024
Tables from this paper
![relevance of the study research paper table 2](https://d3i71xaburhd42.cloudfront.net/029cf371e0881a844b96916317e0f10e3fe3dd7c/17-Table2-1.png)
2 References
How brands become icons: the principles of cultural branding, related papers.
Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers
![](http://writinghelp.online/777/templates/cheerup/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Significance of the study in research refers to the potential importance, relevance, or impact of the research findings. It outlines how the research contributes to the existing body of knowledge, what gaps it fills, or what new understanding it brings to a particular field of study. In general, the significance of a study can be assessed based ...
4. Mention the Specific Persons or Institutions Who Will Benefit From Your Study. 5. Indicate How Your Study May Help Future Studies in the Field. Tips and Warnings. Significance of the Study Examples. Example 1: STEM-Related Research. Example 2: Business and Management-Related Research.
What is the Significance of a Study? Examples and Guide
In simple terms, the significance of the study is basically the importance of your research. The significance of a study must be stated in the Introduction section of your research paper. While stating the significance, you must highlight how your research will be beneficial to the development of science and the society in general.
A significance statement is an essential part of a research paper. It explains the importance and relevance of the study to the academic community and the world at large. To write a compelling significance statement, identify the research problem, and explain why it is significant.
Step 4: Future Studies in the Field. Next, discuss how the significance of your research will benefit future studies, which is especially helpful for future researchers in your field. In the example of cyberbullying affecting student performance, your research could provide further opportunities to assess teacher perceptions of cyberbullying ...
The significance of your study is presented in the opening sections of your evolving research paper whereas the contributions are presented in the final section, after the results. In fact, the central focus in this "Discussion" section should be a specification of the contributions (note, though, that this guidance may not fully align with ...
The significance of the study is the importance of the study for the research area and its relevance to the target group. You need to write it in the Introduction section of the paper, once you have provided the background of the study. You need to talk about why you believe the study is necessary and how it will contribute to a better ...
Here are the steps to write the background of the study in a research paper: Identify the research problem: Start by identifying the research problem that your study aims to address. This can be a particular issue, a gap in the literature, or a need for further investigation. Conduct a literature review: Conduct a thorough literature review to ...
What is the Significance of the Study?
Revised on May 31, 2023. A relevant dissertation topic means that your research will contribute something worthwhile to your field in a scientific, social, or practical way. As you plan out your dissertation process, make sure that you're writing something that is important and interesting to you personally, as well as appropriate within your ...
Step 1: Choose questions relevant to practice and ground your arguments in their reality. Step 2: Convey your findings to managerial audiences. Unfortunately, there is no "invisible hand" that conveys research findings to managers or policymakers. So we need to do it ourselves.
of the Study. The research proposal is a written docu ment which specifies what the researcher intends to study and sets forth the plan or design for answering the research ques tion(s). Frequently investigators seek funding support in order to implement the proposed research. There are a variety of funding sources that sponsor research.
In case your question is about the former, you can showcase the significance of your study in the Results and Discussion sections. For this, you will need to analyze the data you have accumulated in depth and present relevant and important findings in the Results section. In the Discussion, you should refer to other published papers and compare ...
What is the significance of a study and how is it stated in a research paper? The basics of writing a statement of the problem for your research proposal; 4 Step approach to writing the Introduction section of a research paper; For more information, you may search the site using the relevant keywords. Hope that helps. All the best for your study!
How to Write an Effective Background of the Study
Writing a Research Paper Introduction | Step-by-Step Guide
The rationale of the study is the justification for taking on a given study. It explains the reason the study was conducted or should be conducted. This means the study rationale should explain to the reader or examiner why the study is/was necessary. It is also sometimes called the "purpose" or "justification" of a study.
A Practical Guide to Writing Quantitative and Qualitative ...
Significance can be determined before data are gathered. Significance is an attribute of the research problem, not the research findings. Signicance is something you develop in your evolving research paper. The the - oretical framework you present connects your study to what has been investigated previously.
An explanation of the study's significance or the benefits to be derived from investigating the research problem. NOTE: A statement describing the research problem of your paper should not be viewed as a thesis statement that you may be familiar with from high school. Given the content listed above, a description of the research problem is ...
Write your significance of the study in an inverted pyramid format. Start with your research contribution to society as a whole, and then proceed to narrow it down to a specific individual or group of people. When writing your statement of study, the length should not be more than 500 words for a thesis and around 200 words for a research paper.
In the absence of an applicable theory, a conceptual framework substantiates the significance of a particular problem, context or phenomenon within a specific area of the study by illustrating its relevance and connection to research topic. 3 A conceptual framework highlights the importance of a research topic by showing how it relates to the ...
The study of Bavdekar (2015) highlights the importance that the findings and results of a research study should aim to answer the research question which is stated at the beginning of a research ...
This paper ends with a direction for the future course of study that the authors propose to undertake. Keywords: Workplace attitudes, Job Satisfaction, Multidimensional concept, Compensation System
When people think about medical research, they often think about cutting-edge surgical procedures and revolutionary new medications. As important as those advancements are, another type of research is just as vital: nursing research. This type of research informs and improves nursing practice. In many cases, it's focused on improving patient ...
Plantar shear stress may have an important role in the formation of a Diabetic Foot Ulcer, but its measurement is regarded as challenging and has limited research. This paper highlights the importance of anatomical specific shear sensor calibration and presents a feasibility study of a novel shear sensing system which has measured in-shoe shear stress from gait activity on both healthy and ...
In view of the worse dynamic performance and steady-state accuracy caused by nonlinear friction in turntable servo systems, challenges are posed in precise positioning tasks. However, most of the existing research ignores the effect of friction on system performance. Therefore, it is of great significance to analyze the nonlinear characteristics of the transmission mechanism and study ...
Purpose: The study aims to explore how the brand image of Nilgiris Supermarket influences customer perceptions and purchasing decisions. By examining this relationship, the research provides valuable insights into the role of brand image in the retail industry. Research Design: The methodology employed in this case study includes a combination of primary and secondary data collection.