TheCaseSolutions.com

  • Order Status
  • Testimonials
  • What Makes Us Different

Stryker Corporation: Capital Budgeting Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Home >> Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions >> Stryker Corporation: Capital Budgeting

Missions of CERs and the Capital Budgeting Process

The mission of CERs and capital budgeting is Standardization and formalization of the processes and activities of the capital budgeting. The CERs and capital budgeting process are implemented in order to implement or approve the formal and standard process of requesting capital expenditure and capital budgeting processes.

It is expected that it would support the cash flow targets and will help Stryker to maintain 20% growth forever. Attaining 20% growth in the past was the routine of Stryker and it has become a habit to attain this percentage of growth each year, therefore this slogan to attain 20% growth is not difficult to fulfill.

The Extent of Shape by Elements of Corporate Finance Theory

The CERs and Capital budgeting processes are significantly characterized by the elements of corporate finance theory. All CERs must provide the discounted cash flows and present value of inflows and outflows, payback and discounted payback period and internal rate of return before approval. Therefore calculating NPV, IRR and payback period is necessary before the submission of the CERs.

 It is expected that these values will highlight the project’s anticipated and expected outgoing cash flows and earnings. It will also represent the effects of these cash inflows and outflows on the company and will explain the specific risks that could affect the ability of the project or capital expenditure request to deliver economic results.

In addition to this, it is necessary to incorporate or anticipate the financial analyses of “Best Case” and “Worst Case” scenarios for the mergers and acquisitions of CERs which would include income and cash flow figures. This shows the commitment of the Stryker to incorporate the element of the corporate finance theory regarding the approval of requests of capital expenditure.

The Extent they shaped by Stryker’s Particular Industry, History, and Culture

There are different factors, which are playing a major role in the formation of the capital expenditure requests and capital budgeting.First of all, the growth in the industry of medical and increase in the population of the aging baby gives Stryker a natural growth and is expected to attain further growth in future.

However, in order to continue to attain this growth on steady rate or increase in the percentage of rate, they would require designing a method to make the best financial decisions and with the help of these decisions, they would maintaing the company’s growth as they would be growing currently in case of CERs and capital budgeting.

The second factor to influence CERs and capital budgeting is History. Stryker’s business history shows that in the 1970s the newly appointed CEO of Stryker Company named John Brown took charge of the company and set ambitious and high growth targets that were expected to meet the innovative behavior and characteristic of  John Brown and were expected to sustain their 20% forever growth’s slogan.

 The trend of 20% growth is expected to continue over the following decades. In order to maintain 20% growth in the future, Stryker will need to review its strategies and plans of investment and capital expenditure regularly.

The third factor influencing the capital expenditure request and capital budgeting is culture. Stryker Company is very specific to propose many investment projects and getting them approved. They have been making these processes for decades and it has embedded in the culture of the Stryker to submit about 3000 requests regarding capital expenditure before approval.

 By applying more specific and standardized processes, Strykeris able to cut down its number of requests to about 30 per year and expected to analyze each project or request under the same view as each project or request is now submitted under the same requirements.

Primary Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current System

Stryker is currently using such system for the approval of capital expenditure, which takes about 2 weeks for the revision of the activities and processes between the sponsor and responsible division. It is expected that it will take further one week from the individual of committee members for the purpose of revision before submission.

In addition to this, the committee members can demand or request additional information whenever they thought that additional information is also required. There are many advantages and disadvantage of such system. Stryker Corporation Capital Budgeting Case Solution

Advantages of Current System

There are different advantages of this system such asit gives better and efficient control. There is a greater number of management in bureaucratic structure with and strong boundary of each person of management. It is expected that orders, instructions and commands will be very clear and will communicate to all members of the management in an efficient way..................................

This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.

Related Case Solutions & Analyses:

solved case study on capital budgeting

Hire us for Originally Written Case Solution/ Analysis

Like us and get updates:.

Harvard Case Solutions

Search Case Solutions

  • Accounting Case Solutions
  • Auditing Case Studies
  • Business Case Studies
  • Economics Case Solutions
  • Finance Case Studies Analysis
  • Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions
  • Human Resource Cases
  • Ivey Case Solutions
  • Management Case Studies
  • Marketing HBS Case Solutions
  • Operations Management Case Studies
  • Supply Chain Management Cases
  • Taxation Case Studies

More From Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions

  • Revolution Foods
  • Fonterra: Taking on the Dairy World
  • Eastman Kodak Company: Restructuring a Melting Point
  • Help Wanted 2.0: Engaging Others to Tackle Wicked Problems
  • Joline Godfrey Update--1992-2002
  • Environmental Enhancements in Road Vehicle Technology
  • UAE CENTENNIAL PLAN 2071

Contact us:

solved case study on capital budgeting

Check Order Status

Service Guarantee

How Does it Work?

Why TheCaseSolutions.com?

solved case study on capital budgeting

Capital Budgeting Decisions : A Hypothetical Case Study

Profile image of Nishant Agarwal

In today’s fast growing world, companies are faced with tough competitive and its survival depends on its long term planning. A firm is successful only if it invests wisely by taking informed decisions and earn profits. Capital budgeting decision are usually long term decisions, so a firm needs to be much more cautious while taking the final decision whether to go for a project or not. Here, we are going to discuss a case of hypothetical company in which we get to learn different aspects of Capital Budgeting Decisions.

Related Papers

solved case study on capital budgeting

RELATED TOPICS

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2023

 . Assignment 6.5 Mini-Case Study: Capital Budgeting with Fresnel...

Answer & explanation.

a. Year One Revenue                                           $500,000 Cost of Goods Sold                                       $150,000 Gross Profit                                         $350,000 Design Costs                                         $150,000 Production Costs                                       $150,000 Selling and Adminstrative Expenses                             $75,000 Operating Income (EBIT)                                    $25,000 Annual Depreciation on Equipment                               $65,000 Taxable Income                                        $(40,000) Income Tax Expense                                     $10,000 Net Income                                         $(50,000)

Year Two Revenue                                          $650,000 Cost of Goods Sold                                       $195,000 Gross Profit                                        $455,000 Production Costs                                       $195,000 Selling and Adminstrative Expenses                             $93,000 Operating Income (EBIT)                                    $167,000 Annual Depreciation on Equipment                               $65,000 Taxable Income                                        $102,000 Income Tax Expense                                     $25,500 Net Income                                         $76,500

Year Three Revenue                                          $850,000 Cost of Goods Sold                                       $255,000 Gross Profit                                        $595,000 Production Costs                                       $255,000 Selling and Adminstrative Expenses                             $118,500 Operating Income (EBIT)                                    $221,500 Annual Depreciation on Equipment                               $65,000 Taxable Income                                        $156,500 Income Tax Expense                                     $39,125 Net Income                                         $182,375

Year Four Revenue                                          $800,000 Cost of Goods Sold                                       $240,000 Gross Profit                                        $560,000 Production Costs                                       $240,000 Selling and Adminstrative Expenses                             $112,000 Operating Income (EBIT)                                    $208,000 Annual Depreciation on Equipment                               $65,000 Taxable Income                                        $143,000 Income Tax Expense                                     $35,750 Net Income                                         $107,250

Year Five Revenue                                          $250,000 Cost of Goods Sold                                       $75,000 Gross Profit                                               $175,000 Production Costs                                       $75,000 Selling and Adminstrative Expenses                             $35,000 Operating Income (EBIT)                                    $65,000 Annual Depreciation on Equipment                               $0 Taxable Income                                        $65,000 Income Tax Expense                                     $16,250 Net Income                                         $48,750

b. Working capital Year One Current Assets                                       $125,000 Current Liabilities                                     $100,000 Working Capital                                       $25,000 Year Two Current Assets                                      $175,000 Current Liabilities                                     $150,000 Working Capital                                       $25,000 Year Three Current Assets                                       $225,000 Current Liabilities                                     $200,000 Working Capital                                       $25,000 Year Four Current Assets                                       $275,000 Current Liabilities                                     $250,000 Working Capital                                       $25,000 Year Five Current Assets                                       $250,000 Current Liabilities                                     $225,000 Working Capital                                       $25,000

c. Free Cash Flow Year One Net Income                                         $(50,000) Annual Depreciation on Equipment                               $65,000 Working Capital                                       $25,000 Free Cash Flow                                       $40,000

Year Two Net Income                                        $75,000 Annual Depreciation on Equipment                               $65,000 Working Capital                                       $20,000 Free Cash Flow                                       $80,000

Year Three Net Income                                        $125,000 Annual Depreciation on Equipment                               $65,000 Working Capital                                       $15,000 Free Cash Flow                                       $145,000

Year Four Net Income                                        $100,000 Annual Depreciation on Equipment                               $65,000 Working Capital                                       $10,000 Free Cash Flow                                       $125,000

Year Five Net Income                                        $50,000 Annual Depreciation on Equipment                               $65,000 After-Tax Salvage Value of Equipment Year 5                        $95,000 Working Capital                                       $5,000 Free Cash Flow                                       $135,000

d. NPV, BCR and IRR

NPV                                              $195,939.30 BCR                                              2.19 IRR                                              14.37%

e. Based on the analysis, this project should be pursued as it has a positive NPV, BCR and IRR. The NPV of $195,939.30 indicates the project will generate a return greater than the required 12% return. The BCR of 2.19 indicates the project will generate a return of $2.19 for every $1.00 invested. The IRR of 14.37% indicates that the project will generate a return greater than the required 12% return.

The project's financial analysis shows that it should be carried out. The project will produce a return bigger than the necessary 12%, according to the NPV, BCR, and IRR. The project will create a return larger than the needed 12%, as evidenced by the NPV of $195,939.30. In other words, if the proposal is approved, the business will make back more money than it first invested. According to the BCR of 2.19, the project will return $2.19 for every dollar invested. This indicates that there will be a profitable return on the project's investment. The project will produce a return more than the necessary 12%, as evidenced by the IRR of 14.37%. This indicates that the initiative will produce a greater return than what is necessary.

All of these signs suggest that the project should be continued. It will deliver a larger return than the required rate of return and produce a positive return on investment. This indicates that Fresnel Enterprises made a wise investment on the project. REFERENCES.

Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2017). Financial management: Theory and practice (16th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Related Q&A

  • Q I am trying to answer for ( b.   What should the Vail bonds' value give the yield to maturity on a comparable risk​ bond... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q Define fair market value and assessed value, find the tax rates, property tax, express tax rate in percent, dollars per ... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q Include literary analysis. Using at least THREE (3) additional quotes from the book (besides the passage below), discuss... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q Module 3 - Discussion Question In the Supreme Court case Department of Navy v. Egan, the Court stated: "The grant or den... Answered 76d ago
  • Q  . 2. Using 352 observations on 44 rice farmers in the Tarlac region of the Phillipines for 8 years from 2010 to 2017, w... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q   Check marks next to some of the questions means that they are right.   X's next to some of the other questions means t... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q Describe the "three-world order" in the mid-twentieth century. What tactics and strategies did colonized people use to a... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q 5 pages with one additional page for images describe the principal food plants and plants used as medicinals of the Clat... Answered 20d ago
  • Q CDE4.The balance in the supplies account for F.Lang Company on September 1 was $470.Purchases of supplies for cash were ... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q Use the graphic below to answer the following question. There is a mPp air mass dominating the LAP, La Paz, Mexico area.... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q Background : Elegance is a mid-sized hotel located just outside of Miami. Elegance is family owned and is a relatively n... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q  . Power, Root, Exponential, and Logarithmic Functions Quiz Use the graph to answer the question. Item 1 L J On which in... Answered 65d ago
  • Q   You have just graduated from MSU, and have landed a job with a starting salary of $75,000 per year. You have decided t... Answered 72d ago
  • Q  . Review View Help reat Protection and it hasn't detected any threats. If you need to edit this file, click enable edit... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q Which of the following common household items might now be included in the physical layer? A smart thermostat A vacuum c... Answered over 90d ago
  • Q  . Student: PART V (1 point each): For each of the following construct a counterexample that clearly reveals the invalid... Answered over 90d ago

IMAGES

  1. Case Solution for Stryker Corporation Capital Budgeting by Your Helper

    solved case study on capital budgeting

  2. Solved Capital Budgeting Decisions CASE STUDY Learning

    solved case study on capital budgeting

  3. Solved CAPITAL BUDGETING CASE STUDY ANALYSIS ACME Inc. is a

    solved case study on capital budgeting

  4. Solved CAPITAL BUDGETING CASE STUDY ANALYSIS ACME Inc. is a

    solved case study on capital budgeting

  5. Solved a Capital budgeting analysis not only requires the

    solved case study on capital budgeting

  6. CAPITAL BUDGETING CASESTUDY ANALYSIS Project D:

    solved case study on capital budgeting

COMMENTS

  1. What Are Some Cases That Forensic Entomology Has Been Used to Solve?

    Insects have been used to solve many crimes, including a 1991 “Ken and Barbie” murder and a 1997 murder of two young children. Forensic entomology is the study of insects primarily for medico-legal purposes.

  2. What Is the Difference Between Operating and Capital Budget?

    Operating budgets pay for day-to-day expenses, while capital budgets pay for major capital, or investment, spending, writes Kevin Johnston in an article in the Houston Chronicle’s Small Business section.

  3. What Is a Case Study?

    When you’re performing research as part of your job or for a school assignment, you’ll probably come across case studies that help you to learn more about the topic at hand. But what is a case study and why are they helpful? Read on to lear...

  4. Capital budgeting case study

    In this case, Variety Enterprises Corporation (VEC) is considering whether to invest in a new production system. To determine if the project is profitable, VEC

  5. A Case Study Employing Capital Budgeting And Creative Thinking

    budgeting business decision. The next section of this paper (The Case) presents the case, followed by Results, showing the case solution. THE CASE. Anita

  6. A case study on capital budgeting

    A case study on capital budgeting · 1. What are the operating cash flows for all four years if the project continues for the · 2. What is the Net Present Value if

  7. CASE STUDY ON CAPITAL BUDGETING WITH SPECIAL

    Capital Budgeting. -Capital investment refers to the investment in projects whose results would be available after year for the maximization profit of the

  8. A capital Budgeting Analysis Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

    Similarly, if cost of Simple procedure increases by 2% the NPV of the project would become zero. Whereas, if the cost of in-house test and routine checkups

  9. Stryker Corporation: Capital Budgeting Case Solution And Analysis

    There are different factors, which are playing a major role in the formation of the capital expenditure requests and capital budgeting.First of all, the growth

  10. Capital Budgeting Decisions : A Hypothetical Case Study

    In today's fast growing world, companies are faced with tough competitive and its survival depends on its long term planning. A firm is successful only if

  11. RISK AND CAPITAL BUDGETING: A CASE STUDY USING

    This last point, that of understanding the technology, is the biggest hurdle. Frequently management reaches for a potential solution which looks good. This is

  12. Sugar Cane Irrigation: A Case Study in Capital Budgeting

    The approach used to solve this problem is described in the paper. The Irrigation Problem. Background. Irrigation is a most important factor in growing sugar

  13. Excel Solution

    Excel Solution_Extruder Capital Budgeting Case Study - Read online for free. Your factory makes extruded plastic products on demand for other businesses.

  14. Assignment 6.5 Mini-Case Study: Capital Budgeting with Fresnel

    Answer & Explanation. Solved by verified expert. More information. Answered by PresidentBraveryWolf29 on coursehero.com. a. Year One Revenue