literature review of child labour in pakistan

Situation analysis of child labour in Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative study

Affiliation.

1 Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. [email protected]
PMID: 23866451

In Karachi, large employment opportunities, burgeoning population and the availability of cheap labour might be the contributing factors for the increasing prevalence of child labour. A literature review was conducted in 2007 that included published and unpublished literature since 2000. Various organizations working in the field were also covered, while the perception of the child labourers was covered through three focus group discussions. Common health issues among the child labourers in Karachi included respiratory illnesses, fever and generalised pains, as well as drug and sexual abuse. Organisations working for child labour could be broadly categorised into those working for legal advice and advocacy; those generating statistics; and those that are providing interventions. Discussion with children showed that irrespective of the immediate cause, the underlying determinant for child labour was poverty. The best practices identified included evening schools and drop-in centers for working children with provision for skill-based education and basic health facilities. There is need to have more such centres.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Child Welfare / statistics & numerical data
Data Collection / methods
Employment / statistics & numerical data*
Qualitative Research

Cases/Trends
Published: 30 August 2022

Child labor as a barrier to foundational skills: Evidence from Bangladesh and Pakistan

Amita Chudgar 1 ,
Vanika Grover 1 ,
Shota Hatakeyama 1 &
Aliya Bizhanova 1

PROSPECTS volume 52 , pages 137–156 ( 2022 ) Cite this article

86k Accesses

21 Altmetric

Metrics details

According to the International Labor Organization, at least 160 million children ages 5 to 17 around the world were involved in some form of child labor at the beginning of 2020, including 79 million children performing hazardous labor. This article uses recent representative data from Bangladesh and Pakistan to investigate the relationship between foundational skills and child labor engagements for 12- to 14-year-old children. It found a consistent negative association between child labor and reading and numeracy foundational skills. In particular, it found that engagement in hazardous child labor had large negative associations with reading and numeracy foundational skills. It also found negative associations between engagement in economic labor and reading foundational skills. Finally, the article found that intense engagement in household labor was also negatively associated with foundational skills. It discusses the implications of these findings which paint a deeply concerning picture of the challenges ahead of the global community to ensure that all children acquire foundational skills (and beyond). It notes that systematic efforts to define, document, and measure child labor will be crucial to better understand the negative implications of child labor for foundational learning and the potential policy solutions to address these impacts.

Working on a manuscript?

The global community’s attention to foundational skills marks an important departure from the focus on outcomes such as school enrollment, attendance, grade attainment. Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 emphasizes quality education and focuses on the acquisition of foundational skills (United Nations, 2015 ). This commitment draws attention to the global urgency to achieve foundational learning for all children. As we continue to document and address the challenges of foundational learning, the situation of a large and particularly vulnerable group of children—children engaged in child labor—remains understudied.

According to the International Labor Organization (ILO), at least 160 million children ages 5 to 17 around the world were involved in some form of child labor at the beginning of 2020, including 79 million children who perform hazardous labor. Out of the 160 million children *Engaged* in child labor, 89.3 million were young children aged 5 to 11, 35.6 million were children aged 12 to 14, and 35 million were children aged 15 to 17 (ILO &UNICEF, 2020 ). The Covid-19 pandemic has further worsened this situation. During previous global crises, it was observed that “a 1 percentage point rise in poverty leads to at least a 0.7 percentage point increase in child labor” (ILO & UNICEF, 2020 , p. 8). Due to Covid-19–related job losses and economic hardships, the living standards of many vulnerable families have declined. Temporary school closures during the pandemic have also led to young people dropping out of school. Affected by pandemic-related rising poverty and school closure, nearly 9 million more children are expected to enter child labor by the end of 2022 (ILO & UNICEF, 2021 ). These young people are amongst the most marginalized members of our global community and it is important to understand their performance on various SDG 4 outcomes.

In this article, we present recent representative data from Bangladesh and Pakistan used to investigate the relationship between foundational learning and child labor. We contribute to the existing literature on the association between child labor and educational outcomes. This literature has yet to explore systematically the relationship between child labor and foundational skills because large-scale data on foundational skills have not been available until recently. We also advance the discourse in this literature by evaluating various definitions and measures of child labor to understand the impact of child labor on learning. Finally, using a definition of foundational skills aligned with SDG 4, our work contributes to the global concerns surrounding factors that inhibit children’s opportunity to acquire foundational skills.

Review of literature

A growing body of work over the past decades has studied the relationship between child labor and education, or more broadly, human capital development. We review some of the key insights from this literature to inform our research approach and situate our paper within the literature. A vast majority of the literature on child labor shows a negative association between child labor and educational outcomes. But this analysis has been to some extent limited by lack of data on outcomes of interest (such as foundational skills) and it is complicated by the challenges of measuring and accounting for child labor in quantitative analyses. We discuss these issues in turn.

Child labor and educational outcomes

We identified several studies published in the last 2 decades that investigated the relationship between child labor and educational outcomes. While our search was not exhaustive, it represented some broad patterns observed in the literature. Most of the literature we identified is focused on Latin America, followed by Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. The studies from Latin America analyzed data from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, and Venezuela (e.g., Gunnarsson et al., 2006 ). We found a few single-country studies from Latin America, including studies from Colombia (Emerson et al., 2014 ) and Brazil (Guarcello et al., 2005 ). Most recently, Delprato and Akyeampong ( 2019 ) expanded this sample to include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay, and produced the largest cross-national analysis on the subject from Latin America. In Africa, a recent large, cross-country study by Lee et al. ( 2021 ) used data from Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Chad, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Niger, Senegal, and Togo. Other single-country studies focused on Tanzania (Akabayashi & Psacharopoulos, 1999 ), Ghana (Heady, 2003 ), and Ethiopia (Woldehanna & Gebremedhin, 2017 ). From Asia, we primarily identified single-country studies, including studies from China (He, 2016 ), Vietnam (Le & Homel, 2015 ), and Indonesia (Sim et al., 2017 ). Finally, the literature also contains studies that looked beyond one continent, including Orazem and Gunnarsson’s study ( 2004 ), which included 11 Latin American countries from the Latin-American Laboratory of Quality Education (LLECE), several European countries from Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), and Thailand, plus data from some villages in India. Guarcello et al. ( 2005 ) investigated data from Brazil, Kenya, Lebanon, Sri Lanka, and Turkey. Similarly, Bhalotra and Heady ( 2003 ) used data from Pakistan and Ghana, and Rosati and Rossi ( 2003 ) used data from Pakistan and Nicaragua. In the literature, we observed that attention to Asian countries was limited, compared with attention to Latin American and Sub-Saharan African countries.

A vast majority of the studies (except two) we reviewed used school-based data, and by extension, school-based samples. Several of these studies (e.g., Delprato & Akyeampong, 2019 ; Lee et al., 2021 ; Orazem & Gunnarsson, 2004 ) also relied on large-scale testing efforts, including LLECE, Programme d’Analyse des Systèmes Educatifs de la CONFEME (PASEC), and TIMSS. While this allowed the authors to study a number of countries together, it also means that such studies focused on a higher-level skill set (typically measuring content knowledge at Grades 4, 6, or 8, depending on the survey) instead of on foundational learning, and thus these studies were unable to capture information on children who are not currently in school.

In addition to test scores, the studies we reviewed focused on a range of outcomes, including school attendance, time spent studying at home, and grade attainment. Most studies showed that child labor was negatively associated with children’s educational outcomes, including their academic achievement. These findings were consistent across multi-country studies (Delprato & Akyeampong, 2019 ; Lee et al., 2021 ) and single-country studies, such as Emerson et al. ( 2014 ) in Brazil and He ( 2016 ) in China. For example, the study of 10 francophone West and Central African countries by Lee et al. ( 2021 ) found that child labor (measured as any work outside the household) undermined academic achievement regardless of subject, gender, and age. It lowered reading and mathematics scores for both genders and children under 12 and over 13 years. In a similarly large study of 15 Latin American countries, Delprato and Akyeampong ( 2019 ) found that student’s work (measured as work at home and outside home, regardless of payment) was a significant barrier hampering learning in the region, leading to lower math and reading achievement (by around 9 to 13 points) for working students. They found that the group of students most affected were those engaged in paid employment outside the household. In Indonesia, similar research showed that child labor taking place outside family enterprise had more negative effects on student attainment than did work done to help the family business (Sim et al., 2017 ).

The nuance that those engaged in paid employment outside the household were more affected (Delprato & Akyeampong, 2019 ) and the distinction between working for a family enterprise versus a non-family enterprise in Indonesia (Sim et al., 2017 ) led us to another significant observation. We found that studies employed a range of different approaches to operationalize child labor. Some studies identified a child as engaged in child labor if the child reported working outside the home (Emerson et al., 2014 ; Gunnarsson et al., 2006 ; Lee et al., 2021 ). This work could include farm work, petty work, physical labor, or work for a home enterprise (e.g., Heady, 2003 ) and could include paid or unpaid labor (e.g., Woldehanna & Gebremedhin, 2017 ). These distinctions may or may not have been coded separately and often simply were captured under the broader umbrella of “child labor”. Other studies paid attention to children’s work in the household as well, and authors distinguished between a child doing housework, doing farm work, and working for wages (e.g., Delprato & Akyeampong, 2019 ; Guarcello et al., 2005 ; He, 2016 ; Le & Homel, 2015 ; Post, 2011 ). Some studies simply used a yes/no category of child labor (e.g., Emerson et al., 2014 ), whereas others used a detailed accounting of hours worked (Le & Homel, 2015 ). Some attempted to use cut-offs for the number of hours worked (Guarcello et al., 2005 ). Scholars tried, where feasible, to distinguish work for pay and work without pay. We discuss these different definitions and their implications in more detail below, as it is salient to unpacking the associations between child labor and educational outcomes.

Challenges of defining child labor

While no common legal definition of child labor exists, it was defined by ILO ( 1999 ) as work that is too early for children to perform and that poses a risk to children’s health and safety. What constitutes hazardous child labor is similarly hard to define. In general terms, it refers to work that is dangerous to be performed by children of a particular age that, due to circumstances or its nature, can take long hours, and that is detrimental to children’s development. One definition for hazardous child labor is provided by ILO Convention R190 Worst Forms of Child Labor Recommendation ( 1999 ):

Hazardous forms of child labor include (a) work which exposes children to physical, psychological, or sexual abuse; (b) work underground, underwater, at dangerous heights, or in confined spaces; (c) work with dangerous machinery, equipment, and tools, or which involves the handling or transport of heavy loads; (d) work in an unhealthy environment which may, for example, expose children to hazardous substances, agents or processes, or to temperature, noise levels, or vibrations damaging to their health; (e) work under particularly difficult conditions such as work for long hours or during the night or work where the child is unreasonably confined to the premises or the employer. (Section II.3.a–e)

The challenges of definitions notwithstanding, attention to how child labor is operationalized in empirical work is crucial, as it can lead to underreporting or misestimating the time children spend on such activities and can subsequently influence estimates of interests. This challenge has been well documented by scholars (e.g., Basu, 1999 ; Fors, 2012 ; Orazem & Gunnarsson, 2004 ). Basu, for instance, referred to ILO Convention No. 138, which specified 15 as the age below which a person may be considered a child. Another definition considered such a “child” employed or economically active if they worked on a “regular basis” that generated financial reward or market productivity (p. 1085). The proportion of children engaged in child labor in this manner undercounts those engaged in unpaid labor or those engaged in part-time labor. For instance, among all boys globally, 11.2 percent are in child labor compared to 7.8 percent of all girls. In absolute numbers, boys in child labor outnumber girls by 34 million. However, when the definition of child labor expands to include household chores for 21 hours or more each week, the gender gap in prevalence among boys and girls aged 5 to 14 is reduced by almost half (ILO & UNICEF, 2021 , p. 9).

To understand the prevalence and implications of child labor, the operationalization of child labor can be made more nuanced in at least two ways: by paying attention to the “type of work” and “intensity of work” (hours worked). Orazem and Gunnarsson ( 2004 ) made several related observations and asked if there is a “threshold level of hours of work at which damage begins, or if any child labor causes damage” (p. 21), or similarly questioned if “work in the home is less damaging to school achievement than is market work” (p. 22) and if “the damage differs by the type of work children do, or if it is subject to the hours worked alone” (p. 22). Guarcello et al. ( 2005 ) noted that this lack of understanding about “the relative importance of work type and work intensity in influencing learning achievement” contributes to significant knowledge gaps in advancing appropriate policies (p. 258). Similarly, Dammert et al. ( 2018 ) remarked that “because of the focus on the broad category of economic activities (or one of its sub-components), we have little evidence on the extent to which the interventions prevent and reduce the worst forms of child labor, including hazardous work” (p. 115).

The consideration of the type of child labor has implications not just for accounting for the prevalence of child labor but also for understanding its implications. As noted above, for instance, in Indonesia, child labor that took place outside family business had a more negative effect on student attainment than did work done to help the family business (Sim et al., 2017 ). This may be in part because of the relationship between rurality, farming, and child labor, whereby families with larger landholding or “land-rich” families may also have a greater prevalence of child labor. But their wealth may also allow them to compensate in some other ways for their children’s educational outcomes. Researchers have noted this as the wealth paradox (e.g., in Zimbabwe, as shown by Oryoie et al., 2017 ; in Ghana and Pakistan, as shown by Bhalotra & Heady, 2003 ). In contrast with such paid or unpaid work outside the home for a family enterprise, a child engaged in hazardous labor (including paid or unpaid work) could encounter vastly different circumstances. Hazardous child labor is more prevalent among poorer households, in families where a parent may be absent due to death, and/or families where children are living without parents or adult guardians (e.g., Kamei, 2018 ). Thus, while both groups of children are engaging in child labor and perhaps even paid child labor, accounting for the type of labor may be important to understand the overall association between such labor and the child’s well-being and educational outcomes.

The consideration of the intensity of child labor (hours worked) is similarly salient from the perspective of children’s well-being. Rosati and Rossi ( 2003 ) analyzed data from Pakistan and Nicaragua and paid attention not just to the instance of child labor but specifically to the hours worked. They proposed a simultaneous conceptual model to estimate the relationship between school attendance decisions and hours worked, as they are likely to be complementary (whereby engagement in one precludes engagement in another). Indeed, they noted that while “school attendance does not rule out child labor, but working hours are assumed to have a negative influence on human capital accumulation. Hours spent at work reduce the time available for study, tire the child, and reduce learning productivity” (p. 284).

In summary, child labor has a negative impact on the lives of tens of millions of children around the world. The concerns about the well-being of these children deserve our utmost attention. While the global education discourse has moved on to the issues of foundational learning, we lack a systematic understanding of the foundational learning outcomes of children engaged in child labor. A large amount of the existing literature uses learning outcomes at more advanced grade levels, due to its reliance on school-based data. Evaluating children engaged in child labor on more advanced learning matrices can mask the true nature of the challenge faced by these children. Such school-based studies are also unable to take into account the conditions of children engaged in labor who may not be in the school system. In this literature, we also noted relatively limited attention to data from Asia, including Southern Asia, a region home to more than 25 million children aged 5 to 17 years engaged in child labor (ILO & UNICEF, 2021 ). Finally, in our review, we also noted that the literature attended unevenly to the nuances of defining and measuring child labor. These nuances have important policy implications in guiding efforts to limit certain types of child labor.

Our analysis of the relationship between foundational skills and child labor used round 6 of UNICEF Multiple Cluster Indicator Survey (MICS) data from Pakistan and Bangladesh and responded to several of the challenges we identified in the literature. We briefly provide the country context for Bangladesh and Pakistan before discussing the data, methods, and our results.

Country context

The population of Bangladesh is 165 million, and its gross domestic product (GDP) per capita is 1,962 USD (current USD). Gross enrollment rates are 119.6% and 74.4% at the primary and secondary levels, respectively. The gender parity index for each educational level is 1.09 and 1.21 (World Bank, 2021 ). The enrollment numbers exceed the school-age population, which implies that a significant number of children experience repetition at the primary level. In secondary education, enrollment is much better than in Pakistan (discussed below); however, it is significantly skewed toward girls.

National legislation on child labor in Bangladesh through the Labor Act of 2006 (Bangladesh Employers’ Federation, 2009 ) prohibits the employment of children below 12 years of age. Moreover, the act prohibits the employment of adolescents in certain hazardous conditions (e.g., cleaning of moving machinery, working with dangerous machines, working underground or underwater, working in any factories or mines). For children above the age of 12, the act highlights certain conditions, or “light work” (Article 44), that do not endanger the child’s health or development and do not interfere with their education (Bureau of International Labor Affairs, 2020a ). While children’s employment rate in Bangladesh is lower than Pakistan at 5.0% (boys 5.7%; girls 4.2%), it is still sizable: 48% of children are wage workers, 41% are unpaid family workers, and 11% are self-employed. A majority (58%) do only work, and 42% engage in both work and study. Economically active children are almost equally distributed across main sectors (39% in agriculture, 27% in manufacturing, and 33% in service; World Bank, 2021 ).

The population of Pakistan is 221 million, and its GDP per capita is 1,189 USD (current USD). Gross enrollment rates are 95.5% and 44.9% at the primary and secondary levels, respectively. The gender parity index of each educational level is 0.88 and 0.87 (World Bank, 2021 ). Thus, although Pakistan has almost achieved universal primary education, the gender gap in access to primary education is still large. Furthermore, access to secondary education is a significant challenge.

Like Bangladesh, Pakistan has several laws that contain provisions to prohibit child labor below the age of 14. Children over the age of 14 can work in factories under certain conditions and work hour limits. Moreover, the Employment of Children Act of 1991 specifies what conditions are deemed hazardous for children (e.g., not working in the transport of passengers or goods or mails by railway, cinder picking, working at a catering establishment at a railway station, selling crackers and fireworks). Given decentralized governance structures in the country, separate laws against child labor in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, and Sindh provinces have raised the minimum age for employment in hazard conditions to 18 years (Bureau of International Labor Affairs, 2020b ). However, the prevalence of child labor in Pakistan is far greater than in Bangladesh. Children’s employment rate in Pakistan is 13.0% (boys 12.5%; girls 13.5%). Among them, 14% are wage workers, 75% are unpaid family workers, and 10% are self-employed. The majority (87%) do only work, and 13% engage in both work and study. Unlike in Bangladesh, in Pakistan, a majority of economically active children are in the agricultural sector (76% in agriculture, 7% in manufacturing, and 15% in service; World Bank, 2021 ).

Together, these countries—which can boast of near-universal primary enrollment, while at the same time, a sizable population of children is engaged in labor—provide a valuable context to study the association between child labor and foundational or Grade 2–3 level reading and numeracy skills.

We used representative, multi-national data from round 6 of MICS. Administered by UNICEF starting in the mid-1990s, MICS collects internationally comparable education, health, economic, and well-being data across 118 countries. The primary goal of MICS is to monitor progress on national and international goals related to children’s and women’s well-being.

This paper used household survey and child-level data of 10,369, and 9,200 children aged 12 to 14 years from Pakistan (Sindh and Punjab) and Bangladesh, respectively. The data were collected between 2017 and 2021. MICS round 6 includes a new module on children’s learning. The Foundational Learning module captures basic reading and numeracy skills of children aged 7 to 14 to monitor learning and quality of education aligned with SDG 4 (UNICEF, 2021 ). MICS also includes a series of questions to document the prevalence of child labor. The MICS questionnaire includes such questions as whether a child worked outside the home in the last week and year and how many hours they worked outside the home on a range of different activities. Together, these data, along with several relevant contextual variables, allowed us to examine the associations between different forms of child labor and foundational skills.

The dependent variable, foundational skills

MICS questions measure whether children are achieving minimum foundational skills in reading and numeracy at Grade 2 and 3 levels (UNICEF, 2019 ). Foundational reading skills measure three components: (a) word recognition (correctly reading 90% of words in a story), (b) literal questions (replying correctly to all three literal questions), and (c) inferential questions (replying correctly to both inferential questions). If a child succeeds in all three tasks, they are considered to have foundational reading skills. For foundational numeracy skills, MICS measures four tasks: (a) number reading, (b) number discrimination, (c) addition, and (d) pattern recognition. Each task is composed of several questions, and the child must correctly answer all questions to complete the task. If the child succeeds in all four tasks, they are considered to have foundational numeracy skills.

Based on these data, we measured foundational reading and numeracy skills in two ways. For the first type, we adopted a binary measure recommended by UNICEF. We followed the calculation process provided by the UNICEF manual for statistical data analysis of MICS data (Mizunoya & Amaro, 2020 ). We generated measures that indicated if a child had reading skills (yes = 1, no = 0) and if a child had numeracy skills (yes = 1, no = 0). We refer to these variables as Reading-FLS and Numeracy-FLS. For the second type, we generated a continuous measure that reported the number of questions the child had correctly answered for each skill. As described above, reading skills consisted of three components, with six questions, with the variable ranging from 0-6. Each component for numeracy skill consisted of either five or six questions, with a total of 21 questions, and the variable ranged from 0-21. We refer to these variables as Reading-Score and Numeracy-Score.

Independent variable, child labor

The key independent variable of interest is child labor. We categorized child labor into three categories: hazardous labor, economic labor, and household labor.

A child was categorized as working in hazardous labor if the child worked under any of the following hazardous conditions: carrying heavy loads; working with dangerous tools, such as knives and similar or operating heavy machinery; being exposed to dust, fumes, or gas; being exposed to extreme cold, heat, or humidity; being exposed to loud noise or vibration; being required to work at heights; being required to work with chemicals, such as pesticides, glues, or explosives; or being exposed to other things, processes, or conditions bad for health or safety.

Children who worked on the following activities were classified as engaged in economic labor: working or helping their own or the household’s plot, farm, food garden or looking after animals (e.g., growing farm produce; harvesting; or feeding, grazing, or milking animals); helping in a family business or a relative’s business with or without pay; running their own business, producing or selling articles, handicrafts, clothes, food, or agricultural products; or engaging in any other activity in return for income in cash or in-kind. (We attempted to further separate children working on household-oriented economic activity from children engaged in other types of economic work. Significant proportions of children in both countries were engaged in both types of economic labor, so this distinction ultimately did not work meaningfully for our data.)

The final category of child labor included children who were engaged in household labor. If children engaged with any of the following activities, they were categorized into this group: fetching water for household use, collecting firewood for household use, shopping for the household, cooking, washing dishes or cleaning around the house, washing clothes, caring for children, caring for someone old or sick, or performing other household tasks.

We placed each child in one of these three categories of labor or identified the child as not engaged in any labor. If a child was performing both hazardous and household labor or hazardous labor and economic labor, we put the child in the “hazardous labor” category. If the child performed both economic and household labor, we put the child in the “economic labor” category. Children who only performed household labor were put in the “household labor” category.

To understand not just the type but also the intensity of child labor, we used three measures that looked at the hours children worked each week. We used the category of child labor discussed above, but instead of binary variables about whether a child engaged with child labor or not, we used a continuous measure for how long a child engaged in each category (hazardous, economic, household) of child labor. We used both the hours worked and the hours worked along with its squared term to examine the linear and nonlinear relationship between hours of child labor and children’s foundational skills outcomes. Finally, we created a third measure of child labor that indicated the intensity of child labor by identifying children who worked more than around 2.5 hours per day (more than 10% of the total 168 hours in the week) in any category of work and were thus engaged “intensive” child labor.

Control variables

We used the following variables as controls in our regression model: sex of the child, age of the child, whether a household was headed by parent or grandparent of the child, number of children in the household, whether a household was headed by a male or female, household wealth index, whether the mother had completed secondary education, and (in Bangladesh only) if the household was a religious minority in the country.

Additionally, we included district fixed effects to account for the range of local, contextual, and structural aspects of the economy that may have an impact on both the prevalence of child labor and children’s educational performance (see, for example, Fors, 2012 ; Guarcello et al., 2005 ; Orazem & Gunnarsson, 2004 for discussions of local factors impacting child labor). For instance, lack of administrative capacity can both contribute to a lower quality of schooling outcomes and higher child labor in a given district. In such a case, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression without correcting for district fixed effects would yield biased estimates of the associations between child labor and foundational skills. To control for such unobserved district characteristics, we employed the district fixed effects approach.

We first examined characteristics of children by their child labor status using descriptive statistics. Next, we employed the following district fixed effects approach.

\({Y}_{i}\) in equation 1 represents the four outcomes (Reading-FLS, Numeracy-FLS, Reading-Score, Numeracy-Score) for child i in district d . The coefficients β 1 -β 3 capture the relationship between engaging in the specific type of child labor and child outcomes, compared with children who did not engage in child labor. We estimated three additional equations where we replaced the binary categories of types of child labor with hours worked in a specific type of child labor, hours worked in a specific type of child labor, along with a squared term to account for nonlinear relationships, and finally a set of indicators for if the child was engaged in a given type of labor for more than about 2.5 hours each day (intensive labor). In total for each country, with four outcomes and four key sets of independent variables, we estimate 16 equations.

In this section we present our findings, starting with the descriptive results.

Descriptive results

Tables 1 and 2 compare children who did and did not engage in child labor in Bangladesh and Pakistan, respectively. The first column describes children who were not engaged in labor, the second column provides descriptive statistics on children engaged in any form of child labor. The final three columns then further separate those children engaged in labor by the type of labor they engaged in.

In Bangladesh, female children and older children were more likely to engage in any form of child labor, compared with male children and younger children. They worked, on average, nearly 8 hours a week and tended to come from rural families with less-educated mothers and lower levels of wealth. In Bangladesh, 45% of children who did not engage in child labor had foundational numeracy skills and, on average, got 19 out of 21 questions correct. However, 42% of children who engaged in child labor had foundational numeracy skills but, on average, they too got 19 out of 21 questions correct. On the reading side, 75% of children who did not engage in child labor had foundational reading skills and, on average, got 5 out of 6 questions correct, whereas 71% of children who engaged in child labor had foundational reading skills but, on average, got 5 out of 6 questions correct.

Some of these observations become more nuanced when we look separately at children performing different types of labor. Children performing hazardous labor and economic labor tended to disproportionately be male; female children were overrepresented in household labor. Children performing hazardous work came from particularly challenging home circumstances with lower levels of wealth and less-educated mothers. They also tended to be disproportionately likely to belong to a language minority group and reside in a rural area. Not surprisingly, the foundational skills performance of children working in hazardous conditions was worst among all children, followed by those working in economic labor, especially in terms of their reading skills. Finally, despite various laws in place to protect the 12- to 14-year-old children in our sample, children working in hazardous labor worked 18 hours a week, and those in economic labor worked 11 hours a week, on average.

In Pakistan, the data reveal some patterns similar to those in Bangladesh. Girls and older children were more likely to be engaged in some form of labor, and once again, children engaged in any form of labor, on average, came from slightly larger families with lower wealth and less-educated mothers. They also tended to be slightly more likely to belong to rural and language-minority households. Children engaged in child labor worked nearly 11 hours, on average, per week. Their foundational skills performance in both reading and numeracy were also lower, compared with that of children not engaged in any form of labor. Overall, on all counts, foundational skills levels in Pakistan were lower than those we found in Bangladesh.

Once again, looking at children engaged in different types of labor reveals additional nuances. We found an overrepresentation of female children in household labor and an overrepresentation of male children in hazardous labor. Children engaged in hazardous labor came from households where a majority of their mothers had less than a secondary level of education and from families with very low levels of wealth. Like in Bangladesh, they were more likely to belong to a language minority group and reside in a rural area. And once again, despite various laws to protect these children, children were engaged in hazardous labor, on average, for 24 hours per week, followed by 15 hours per week for those engaged in economic labor. The foundational skills performance of the children who worked was alarmingly low as well. The children working in hazardous labor were at an extreme disadvantage in terms of their foundational skills.

These descriptive data from Bangladesh and Pakistan reveal the importance of considering different types of childhood work or labor separately. They reveal in particular the extremely precarious situation of children engaged in hazardous labor. A proportionally smaller group, these children appear to be living in exceedingly challenging circumstances. Their home background and their lower education performance reveal the structural traps these children find themselves in. Less-educated parents, greater poverty, rurality, and their status as (language) minorities were all associated with these children engaging in the worst form of labor. These children themselves performed poorly on foundational reading and numeracy skills (measured at Grade 2 and 3 level), even at a relatively advanced age of 12 to 14 years.

Regression results

Tables 3 and 4 display regression results that analyze the relationships between different measures of child labor and foundational skills (Reading-FLS, Numeracy-FLS, Reading-Score, Numeracy-Score). Each table is divided into four horizontal panels to present results from a different set of child labor measures. The analysis presented here controlled for several covariates (e.g., family wealth, family size, maternal education, child age) that are important in explaining variations in foundational skills. We also accounted for the unique contextual attributes of each child and family by using district fixed effects.

Focusing on Table 3 , panel 1, for Bangladesh, when we used a simple binary variable that indicates engagement in one of the three types of child labor, we saw a consistent and negative relationship between hazardous child labor and all of the foundational skills outcomes. For instance, the foundational numeracy and reading score of a child engaging in hazardous labor was lower by 0.17 and 0.32 units, respectively, at the 0.1% level of significance. Their foundational numeracy and reading skills were also 9.6% and 16.5% lower, respectively, at the 0.1% level of significance. We do not observe any negative association between engagement in household labor (yes/no) and foundational skills. Those engaged in economic activities did receive significantly lower reading scores compared with scores of children not working.

A nearly identical pattern is evident when we look at results in Table 3 , panel 2, for “hours worked” under each category instead of a simple yes/no response. We found that every incremental hour of hazardous labor was associated with lower numeracy and reading scores and lower numeracy and reading foundational skills. Paying attention to hours worked, in Table 3 , panel 2, we found a more consistent negative impact of economic labor in particular on reading scores and reading foundational skills. This is aligned with the observations (e.g., Dumas, 2012 from Senegal) that children with some work experience may acquire numeracy skills as a part of their trade or service work.

Panels 3 and 4 in Table 3 provide several additional nuances to these observations. In panel 3, we looked at the impact of engaging in child labor for children who were working, on average, around 2.5 hours or more per day, per week, in the respective category of child labor. These children engaged in intensive child labor did suffer large and significant negative consequences of engaging in hazardous activities and in economic activity for such sustained periods, as seen in panel 3. The foundational numeracy and reading scores of a child engaging in intensive hazardous labor were 0.27 and 0.84 units lower, respectively, at the 0.1% level of significance, and a significant proportion of them were unlikely to attain foundational numeracy and reading skills. Yet even for this level of intensive engagement, we did not note any negative association of engaging in household labor in Bangladesh.

In panel 4 of Table 3 , we observe the impact of hours worked along with a squared term for hours worked and can begin to see potential patterns associated with extensive household work. We note that, for household chores, the coefficient associated with hours worked was positive, implying that a small level of engagement in household chores may not be counterproductive for foundational skills. However, once we take into account the second-order impact or the relationship between hours worked-squared and foundational skills, the potential benefit of household work increases at a decreasing rate and may eventually plateau for numeracy score, numeracy skills, and reading scores. The general impact of economic labor and hazardous labor remains negative. In terms of numeracy score, engagement in both these activities also led to a decline in scores at an increasing rate, implying that greater engagement in economic or hazardous labor will lead to a faster/more rapid decline in numeracy scores.

The four panels in Table 4 display similar results for Pakistan. In Pakistan, while we once again observed a consistent negative association between participation in child labor and foundational skills, we also noted some interesting differences from Bangladesh. Panel 1 shows that any involvement in economic or hazardous labor was associated negatively with almost all four of the outcomes: reading foundational skills, reading score, numeracy score, and also numeracy foundational skills (for hazardous labor). The foundational numeracy score of children engaging in economic activities for instance was lower by 0.15 units, and the child’s foundational reading score was lower by 0.28 units. The coefficients for children engaged in hazardous labor were larger, implying a worse association between hazardous labor and foundational skills. Once again, we found no association between engagement in household chores (yes/no) and foundational skills.

In panel 2, once we account for hours worked (rather than a yes/no measure of child labor engagement), we notice changing patterns. We now note that incremental involvement in all three forms of labor was associated with declining reading scores and reading foundational skills. For the numeracy score and numeracy skills, the results were uneven in terms of significance but tended in the same (negative) direction. Paying closer attention to children engaged in intensive labor, as we did in panel 3, is again worthwhile, as we found that these children who engaged in intensive labor (nearly 2.5 hours per day/week) were especially likely to underperform their non-working counterparts. Children who worked intensively in household labor also did not escape these negative relationships. Interestingly, only children who worked in economic labor seemed to be somewhat immune to the negative association between intensive child labor and their numeracy foundational skills and numeracy scores.

Panel 4, Table 4 , once again shows that in Pakistan, we found much more consistent associations between child labor and reading foundational skills and reading scores. For each type of child labor engagement (at home, economic, and hazardous), the association between child labor and reading outcomes was negative and the association decreased at an increasing rate. We noted a similar negative association between hazardous labor and numeracy scores.

Child labor, especially hazardous child labor and intensive child labor (where the child is engaged in labor for several hours each week) is a highly problematic phenomenon because of the implications it has for a child’s well-being. Children who engage in such labor represent the most marginalized members of our global community, not just because of the work they perform but also because of the challenging circumstances that lead them into such labor in the first place. These circumstances include poverty, lack of opportunities for parents and guardians to find adequate means to support their families. Edmonds and Theoharides ( 2021 ) noted at least two pathways through which child labor also impedes the very economic growth needed to break free from this cycle. Child labor impedes child development (including education, as we show in this paper), which has long-term consequences for the productive capacities of future generations. Child labor, where available, also drives down the wages of the unskilled jobs children tend to engage in. This may reduce investment in high-skilled, high-growth opportunities within the community or region. The presence and prevalence of child labor is thus not an isolated problem but rather marks patterns of structural inequities and lack of opportunities and resources that both cause child labor and are perpetuated by child labor.

In this study using a descriptive approach, we focused on understanding the relationship between engagement in child labor and reading and numeracy foundational skills, as defined by and aligned with the SDG 4 goal. In doing so, our study marks a departure from existing literature on the relationship between child labor and educational outcomes. This literature was not able until recently to attend to foundational skills as an outcome, due to the lack of available data. Prior studies on the relationship between child labor and educational performance tended to rely on larger cross-national data, that were primarily school based and tested children’s academic skills at Grades 4, 6, and 8. While such outcomes are interesting, they also measure a skill set that may already be too advanced for some children, especially children engaged in labor. Such a measure may therefore lump a large proportion of children performing child labor into a low-performing category because of lack of nuance. Also, such school-based data and measures would entirely overlook children out-of-school. Our use of recent (2017–2021) foundational skills data from Bangladesh and Pakistan addressed these concerns. We measured the performance of 12- to 14-year-old children on Grade 2 and 3 skills (skills they may have acquired by age 7 or 8). Because these foundational skills were measured as a part of a household survey it also ensured that children out-of-school were included in the analysis. Guided by the literature, we also paid attention to different ways of measuring and defining child labor. Even with this relatively lower performance bar, our findings were sobering.

Our results showed several noteworthy patterns. At the outset, despite laws against child labor in both countries, we found a non-trivial number of children engaged in child labor, including economic and hazardous child labor. The children engaged in hazardous labor came from some of the most vulnerable circumstances. We also found that hazardous child labor was unequivocally negatively associated with foundational reading and numeracy skills, even for children ages 12 to 14 years old. Greater exposure to hazardous labor as well as intense exposure to hazardous labor were associated with negative outcomes, and as some of the analyses showed, the negative association between hazardous labor and foundational skills may have decreased foundational skills at an increasing rate (i.e., the decline in foundational skills became more rapid with every additional hour of hazardous labor). It is also noteworthy that the coefficients associated with hazardous labor were consistently larger than the coefficients associated with other types of child labor, regardless of their significance levels, implying that hazardous labor may have a particularly large negative impact on foundational skills. We also found a generally consistent and negative relationship between engaging in economic labor and foundational skills in both countries. We found that greater engagement with economic labor or more intense engagement with such labor was associated with declining foundational skills and scores.

One interesting distinction from hazardous labor is the relationship between economic labor and numeracy performance. In the Pakistan data, and to some extent the Bangladesh data, the association between economic labor and numeracy scores and skills was not consistently significantly negative. This may be due to potential market-based transactions and interactions some of these children had to conduct, which might have led them to use simple numerical skills with some regularity in the work they do. To be clear, these economic activities did not improve their numeracy performance in either country.

Finally, engagement in household labor may have the least negative association with these skills. This would not be surprising, as the category of household labor incorporates a broad range of tasks, many of which may be regularly incorporated in a child’s life (e.g., looking after a younger sibling or doing dishes) and may not become disruptive to their learning immediately. However, we found a negative association in Pakistan between intense household labor and foundational skills, and in Bangladesh, we found that the potential positive association between household labor and foundational skills may eventually plateau. This leads to a final significant observation based on our study: the importance of carefully accounting for and measuring child labor. This is an observation other scholars have made before us; we add some further observations to this discourse.

We found in our analysis that carefully defining the type of child labor engagement is indeed crucial to understanding the potential impact of children’s engagement in labor. Children engaged in hazardous labor may get classified as engaged in economic labor or as working with or without pay outside the home. However, as we see this category of children, their work must be recognized and recorded separately. Attention to these distinctions has implications both for data collection efforts and for eventual policy discussions, which may want to focus more urgently on specific forms of child labor. We also found that the intensity of child labor engagement is important to document. Depending on the dependent variable and the context, a mere engagement, or an hourly increment in child labor, may be associated negatively with foundational skills. We also found it valuable to separately identify children who engage in such work intensively each week (we used roughly 2.5 hours a day, or 10% of total hours a week, as our measure of intensive engagement). The approach to use not just the number of hours worked but also a squared term for hours worked also proved to be fruitful in revealing nuances of how increased exposure to child labor may prove detrimental. This approach, for instance, contrasts with UNICEF’s ( 2020 ) classification of child labor, whereby a 12- to 14-year-old would be classified as engaged in economic labor if they worked 14 or more hours each week, and in household work if they worked 28 or more hours per week. Using such a definition of child labor may have led us to underestimate or ignore the potential damages of even relatively lower levels of child labor engagement.

Our findings taken together paint a deeply concerning picture of the challenges ahead of the global community to ensure that all children acquire foundational skills (and beyond). A significant number of children who engage in child labor are deprived of this outcome. The Covid-19 pandemic has worsened this plight and pushed many more children into labor and limited their formal opportunities to learn. Systematic efforts to define, document, and measure child labor will also be crucial to better understand the negative implications of child labor and the potential policy solutions to address these impacts.

Akabayashi, H., & Psacharopoulos, G. (1999). The trade-off between child labor and human capital formation: A Tanzanian case study. The Journal of Development Studies, 35 (5), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389908422594 .

Article Google Scholar

Bangladesh Employers’ Federation (2009). A handbook on the Bangladesh Labour Act, 2006 . https://www.studocu.com/row/document/university-of-dhaka/business-law/a-handbook-on-the-bangladesh-labour-act-2006/7024542

Basu, K. (1999). Child labor: Cause, consequence, and cure, with remarks on international labor standards. Journal of Economic Literature, 37 (3), 1083–1119. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.3.1083 .

Bureau of International Labor Affairs (2020a). 2020a findings on the worst forms of child labor: Bangladesh. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/child_labor_reports/tda2020/Bangladesh.pdf

Bureau of International Labor Affairs (2020b). 2020b findings on the worst forms of child labor: Pakistan. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/child_labor_reports/tda2020/Pakistan.pdf

Bhalotra, S., & Heady, C. (2003). Child farm labor: The wealth paradox. The World Bank Economic Review, 17 (2), 197–227.

Dammert, A., de Hoop, J., Mvukiyehe, E., & Rosati, F. (2018). Effects of public policy on child labor: Current knowledge, gaps, and implications for program design. World Development, 110, 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.001 .

Delprato, M., & Akyeampong, K. (2019). The effect of working on students’ learning in Latin America: Evidence from the learning survey TERCE. International Journal of Educational Development . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102086 .

Dumas, C. (2012). Does work impede child learning? The case of Senegal. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 60 (4), 773–793.

Edmonds E. V., & Theoharides, C. (2021). Child labor and economic development. In K. F. Zimmermann (Ed.), Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics . Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_74-1

Emerson, P., Ponczek, V., & Souza, A. (2014). Child labor and learning . Policy research working paper 6904 . World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/18774

Fors, H. C. (2012). Child labour: A review of recent theory and evidence with policy implications. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26 (4), 570–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00663.x .

Guarcello, L., Lyon, S., & Rosati, F. C. (2005). Impact of children’s work on school attendance and performance a review of school survey evidence from five countries . Working Paper 994444243402676, International Labour Organization.

Gunnarsson, V., Orazem, P., & Sanchez, M. (2006). Child labor and school achievement in Latin America. World Bank Economic Review, 20 (1), 31–54.

He, H. (2016). Child labor and academic achievement: Evidence from Gansu Province in China. China Economic Review, 38, 130–150.

Heady, C. (2003). The effect of child labor on learning achievement. World Development, 31 (2), 385–398.

ILO (International Labour Organization) (1999, June 17). Worst forms of child labour recommendation . https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312528

ILO & UNICEF (2020). Covid-19 and child labour: A time of crisis, a time to act. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---ipec/documents/publication/wcms_747421.pdf

ILO & UNICEF (2021). Child labour: Global estimates 2020, trends and the road forward . https://data.unicef.org/resources/child-labour-2020-global-estimates-trends-and-the-road-forward/

Kamei, A. (2018). Parental absence and agency: The household characteristics of hazardous forms of child labor in Nepal. Journal of International Development, 30 (7), 1116–1141.

Le, H., & Homel, R. (2015). The impact of child labor on children’s educational performance: Evidence from rural Vietnam. Journal of Asian Economics, 36, 1–13.

Lee, J., Kim, H., & Rhee, D. (2021). No harmless child labor: The effect of child labor on academic achievement in francophone Western and Central Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 80, 0738–0593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102308 .

Mizunoya, S., & Amaro, D. (2020). A statistical data analysis manual using Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS6) with a special focus on achieving the Sustainable Development Goals . UNICEF. https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/MICS6-manual-for-stats-data-analysis-English_2020_v2.pdf

Orazem, P. F., & Gunnarsson, L. V. (2004). Child labour, school attendance and performance: A review. Working paper 18213. International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.18213

Oryoie, Al., Alwang, J., & Tideman, N. (2017). Child labor and household land holding: Theory and empirical evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development, 100, 45–58.

Post, D. (2011). Primary school student employment and academic achievement in Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. International Labour Review, 150 (3–4), 255–278.

Rosati, F., & Rossi, M. (2003). Children’s working hours and school enrollment: Evidence from Pakistan and Nicaragua. The World Bank Economic Review, 17 (2), 283–295.

Sim, A., Suryadarma, D., & Suryahadi, A. (2017). The consequences of child market work on the growth of human capital. World Development, 91, 144–155.

UNICEF (2019). Guidelines for adapting the foundational learning module to non-multiple indicator cluster household surveys . https://data.unicef.org/resources/guidelines-adapting-foundational-module-non-mics/

UNICEF (2021). MICS6 indicator list: Indicators and definitions . https://mics.unicef.org/tools

United Nations (2015). Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong opportunities for all SDG indicators. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/goal-04/

Woldehanna, T., & Gebremedhin, A. (2017). Is child work detrimental to the educational achievement of children? Results from Young Lives Study in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Economics, 26, 123–151.

Google Scholar

World Bank (2021). World development indicators . https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Education Administration, Michigan State University, Erickson Hall 620 Farm Lane Rm 408, East Lansing, 48824, MI, USA

Amita Chudgar, Vanika Grover, Shota Hatakeyama & Aliya Bizhanova

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amita Chudgar .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Cite this article.

Chudgar, A., Grover, V., Hatakeyama, S. et al. Child labor as a barrier to foundational skills: Evidence from Bangladesh and Pakistan. Prospects 52 , 137–156 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09614-9

Download citation

Accepted : 25 June 2022

Published : 30 August 2022

Issue Date : September 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09614-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Child labor
Foundational skills
Find a journal
Publish with us

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings
Advanced Search
Journal List
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection

Child labor as a barrier to foundational skills: Evidence from Bangladesh and Pakistan

Amita chudgar.

Department of Education Administration, Michigan State University, Erickson Hall 620 Farm Lane Rm 408, East Lansing, 48824 MI USA

Vanika Grover

Shota hatakeyama, aliya bizhanova.

Review of literature

Child labor and educational outcomes

Challenges of defining child labor

Hazardous forms of child labor include (a) work which exposes children to physical, psychological, or sexual abuse; (b) work underground, underwater, at dangerous heights, or in confined spaces; (c) work with dangerous machinery, equipment, and tools, or which involves the handling or transport of heavy loads; (d) work in an unhealthy environment which may, for example, expose children to hazardous substances, agents or processes, or to temperature, noise levels, or vibrations damaging to their health; (e) work under particularly difficult conditions such as work for long hours or during the night or work where the child is unreasonably confined to the premises or the employer. (Section II.3.a–e)

Country context

The dependent variable, foundational skills

Independent variable, child labor

The key independent variable of interest is child labor. We categorized child labor into three categories: hazardous labor, economic labor, and household labor.

Control variables

We first examined characteristics of children by their child labor status using descriptive statistics. Next, we employed the following district fixed effects approach.

Y i in equation 1 represents the four outcomes (Reading-FLS, Numeracy-FLS, Reading-Score, Numeracy-Score) for child i in district d . The coefficients β 1 -β 3 capture the relationship between engaging in the specific type of child labor and child outcomes, compared with children who did not engage in child labor. We estimated three additional equations where we replaced the binary categories of types of child labor with hours worked in a specific type of child labor, hours worked in a specific type of child labor, along with a squared term to account for nonlinear relationships, and finally a set of indicators for if the child was engaged in a given type of labor for more than about 2.5 hours each day (intensive labor). In total for each country, with four outcomes and four key sets of independent variables, we estimate 16 equations.

In this section we present our findings, starting with the descriptive results.

Descriptive results

Tables Tables1 1 and and2 2 compare children who did and did not engage in child labor in Bangladesh and Pakistan, respectively. The first column describes children who were not engaged in labor, the second column provides descriptive statistics on children engaged in any form of child labor. The final three columns then further separate those children engaged in labor by the type of labor they engaged in.

Characteristics of children engaged in child labor by type of labor, Bangladesh

Descriptive statistics based on numeracy sample. Due to the presence of children who took reading but not numeracy and numeracy but not reading, the sample size is slightly different. The sample size based on reading is 7948.

Characteristics of children engaged in child labor by type of labor, Pakistan

Regression results

Tables Tables3 3 and and4 4 display regression results that analyze the relationships between different measures of child labor and foundational skills (Reading-FLS, Numeracy-FLS, Reading-Score, Numeracy-Score). Each table is divided into four horizontal panels to present results from a different set of child labor measures. The analysis presented here controlled for several covariates (e.g., family wealth, family size, maternal education, child age) that are important in explaining variations in foundational skills. We also accounted for the unique contextual attributes of each child and family by using district fixed effects.

OLS regression of child labor on foundational numeracy and reading skills, Bangladesh

Regression in each panel controls the following variables: Sex of the child, age of the child, whether the household head is either a parent or grandparent of the child, number of children in the same household, whether household head is male, mother’s educational background is less than secondary completion, wealth index of the household, language minority, religious minority, household location is urban, district of the household.

*Significance at 5% level, **Significance at 1% level, ***Significance at 0.1% level

Regression of child labor on foundational numeracy and reading skills, Pakistan

Focusing on Table Table3, 3 , panel 1, for Bangladesh, when we used a simple binary variable that indicates engagement in one of the three types of child labor, we saw a consistent and negative relationship between hazardous child labor and all of the foundational skills outcomes. For instance, the foundational numeracy and reading score of a child engaging in hazardous labor was lower by 0.17 and 0.32 units, respectively, at the 0.1% level of significance. Their foundational numeracy and reading skills were also 9.6% and 16.5% lower, respectively, at the 0.1% level of significance. We do not observe any negative association between engagement in household labor (yes/no) and foundational skills. Those engaged in economic activities did receive significantly lower reading scores compared with scores of children not working.

A nearly identical pattern is evident when we look at results in Table Table3, 3 , panel 2, for “hours worked” under each category instead of a simple yes/no response. We found that every incremental hour of hazardous labor was associated with lower numeracy and reading scores and lower numeracy and reading foundational skills. Paying attention to hours worked, in Table Table3, 3 , panel 2, we found a more consistent negative impact of economic labor in particular on reading scores and reading foundational skills. This is aligned with the observations (e.g., Dumas, 2012 from Senegal) that children with some work experience may acquire numeracy skills as a part of their trade or service work.

Panels 3 and 4 in Table Table3 3 provide several additional nuances to these observations. In panel 3, we looked at the impact of engaging in child labor for children who were working, on average, around 2.5 hours or more per day, per week, in the respective category of child labor. These children engaged in intensive child labor did suffer large and significant negative consequences of engaging in hazardous activities and in economic activity for such sustained periods, as seen in panel 3. The foundational numeracy and reading scores of a child engaging in intensive hazardous labor were 0.27 and 0.84 units lower, respectively, at the 0.1% level of significance, and a significant proportion of them were unlikely to attain foundational numeracy and reading skills. Yet even for this level of intensive engagement, we did not note any negative association of engaging in household labor in Bangladesh.

In panel 4 of Table Table3, 3 , we observe the impact of hours worked along with a squared term for hours worked and can begin to see potential patterns associated with extensive household work. We note that, for household chores, the coefficient associated with hours worked was positive, implying that a small level of engagement in household chores may not be counterproductive for foundational skills. However, once we take into account the second-order impact or the relationship between hours worked-squared and foundational skills, the potential benefit of household work increases at a decreasing rate and may eventually plateau for numeracy score, numeracy skills, and reading scores. The general impact of economic labor and hazardous labor remains negative. In terms of numeracy score, engagement in both these activities also led to a decline in scores at an increasing rate, implying that greater engagement in economic or hazardous labor will lead to a faster/more rapid decline in numeracy scores.

The four panels in Table Table4 4 display similar results for Pakistan. In Pakistan, while we once again observed a consistent negative association between participation in child labor and foundational skills, we also noted some interesting differences from Bangladesh. Panel 1 shows that any involvement in economic or hazardous labor was associated negatively with almost all four of the outcomes: reading foundational skills, reading score, numeracy score, and also numeracy foundational skills (for hazardous labor). The foundational numeracy score of children engaging in economic activities for instance was lower by 0.15 units, and the child’s foundational reading score was lower by 0.28 units. The coefficients for children engaged in hazardous labor were larger, implying a worse association between hazardous labor and foundational skills. Once again, we found no association between engagement in household chores (yes/no) and foundational skills.

Panel 4, Table Table4, 4 , once again shows that in Pakistan, we found much more consistent associations between child labor and reading foundational skills and reading scores. For each type of child labor engagement (at home, economic, and hazardous), the association between child labor and reading outcomes was negative and the association decreased at an increasing rate. We noted a similar negative association between hazardous labor and numeracy scores.

Biographies

is a professor of education policy at Michigan State University, USA. Her work examines the influence of home, school, and community contexts on educational access and achievement of children in resource-constrained environments. Through the analysis of diverse, large-scale, national, regional, and cross-national datasets, she studies the role of policy-relevant variables in ensuring equal educational opportunities for disadvantaged children and youth. Her recent research has engaged with issues of teacher labor markets in developing countries, proliferation of private schools in low-income settings and educational experiences of marginalized youth. Amita’s work appears in various leading education journals and co-authored book projects.

is interested in issues of education, development, and policy across low- and middle-income countries. Vanika graduated from the Education Policy PhD program at Michigan State University in 2022. Her dissertation research focused on parental involvement in early childhood care and education across Ghana, The Gambia, Zimbabwe, and India. She has prior work experience in policy research and impact evaluations with international organizations like UNICEF Innocenti and Oxford Policy Management spanning topics of education, health, and child protection. Vanika also holds a Master’s degree in Development Economics from the University of Sussex, UK and a Bachelor’s (Honors) in Economics from Lady Shri Ram College, University of Delhi, India.

is interested in international research to inform effective, efficient, and equitable education policy. Shota graduated from the Education Policy PhD program at Michigan State University in 2022. His dissertation focused on children with disabilities and their schooling and learning in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Ghana. Prior to his doctoral study, he worked on statistical and planning capacity building of education ministries and policy and institutional assessment on gender at the World Bank HQ, UNICEF Zimbabwe, UNICEF HQ, and UNICEF Malawi offices. He holds a Master’s degree in Economics from Kobe University, Japan, and a Bachelor’s in Education from the University of Tokyo, Japan.

is a 3d year doctoral student in education policy at MSU. Her research interests are international and comparative education policies, teacher labor markets, school culture, and immigrant education. Prior to joining MSU Aliya worked at the World Bank country office in Kazakhstan and the OECD for institutions and analytical assistance projects focused on K-12 education reforms, skills development, and youth issues. She holds a master’s degree in education policy from Vanderbilt University, USA, and a higher education diploma from Samara State University, Russia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Amita Chudgar, Email: ude.usm@catima .

Vanika Grover, Email: ude.usm@revorgv .

Shota Hatakeyama, Email: ude.usm@2yekatah .

Aliya Bizhanova, Email: ude.usm@vonahzib .

Akabayashi H, Psacharopoulos G. The trade-off between child labor and human capital formation: A Tanzanian case study. The Journal of Development Studies. 1999; 35 (5):120–140. doi: 10.1080/00220389908422594. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Bangladesh Employers’ Federation (2009). A handbook on the Bangladesh Labour Act, 2006 . https://www.studocu.com/row/document/university-of-dhaka/business-law/a-handbook-on-the-bangladesh-labour-act-2006/7024542
Basu K. Child labor: Cause, consequence, and cure, with remarks on international labor standards. Journal of Economic Literature. 1999; 37 (3):1083–1119. doi: 10.1257/jel.37.3.1083. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Bureau of International Labor Affairs (2020a). 2020a findings on the worst forms of child labor: Bangladesh. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/child_labor_reports/tda2020/Bangladesh.pdf
Bureau of International Labor Affairs (2020b). 2020b findings on the worst forms of child labor: Pakistan. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/child_labor_reports/tda2020/Pakistan.pdf
Bhalotra S, Heady C. Child farm labor: The wealth paradox. The World Bank Economic Review. 2003; 17 (2):197–227. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhg017. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Dammert A, de Hoop J, Mvukiyehe E, Rosati F. Effects of public policy on child labor: Current knowledge, gaps, and implications for program design. World Development. 2018; 110 :104–123. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Delprato M, Akyeampong K. The effect of working on students’ learning in Latin America: Evidence from the learning survey TERCE. International Journal of Educational Development. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102086. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Dumas C. Does work impede child learning? The case of Senegal. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 2012; 60 (4):773–793. doi: 10.1086/665603. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Edmonds E. V., & Theoharides, C. (2021). Child labor and economic development. In K. F. Zimmermann (Ed.), Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics . Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_74-1
Emerson, P., Ponczek, V., & Souza, A. (2014). Child labor and learning . Policy research working paper 6904 . World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/18774
Fors HC. Child labour: A review of recent theory and evidence with policy implications. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2012; 26 (4):570–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00663.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Guarcello, L., Lyon, S., & Rosati, F. C. (2005). Impact of children’s work on school attendance and performance a review of school survey evidence from five countries . Working Paper 994444243402676, International Labour Organization.
Gunnarsson V, Orazem P, Sanchez M. Child labor and school achievement in Latin America. World Bank Economic Review. 2006; 20 (1):31–54. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhj003. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
He H. Child labor and academic achievement: Evidence from Gansu Province in China. China Economic Review. 2016; 38 :130–150. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2015.12.008. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Heady C. The effect of child labor on learning achievement. World Development. 2003; 31 (2):385–398. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00186-9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
ILO (International Labour Organization) (1999, June 17). Worst forms of child labour recommendation . https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312528
ILO & UNICEF (2020). Covid-19 and child labour: A time of crisis, a time to act. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---ipec/documents/publication/wcms_747421.pdf
ILO & UNICEF (2021). Child labour: Global estimates 2020, trends and the road forward . https://data.unicef.org/resources/child-labour-2020-global-estimates-trends-and-the-road-forward/
Kamei A. Parental absence and agency: The household characteristics of hazardous forms of child labor in Nepal. Journal of International Development. 2018; 30 (7):1116–1141. doi: 10.1002/jid.3371. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Le H, Homel R. The impact of child labor on children's educational performance: Evidence from rural Vietnam. Journal of Asian Economics. 2015; 36 :1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2014.11.001. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Lee J, Kim H, Rhee D. No harmless child labor: The effect of child labor on academic achievement in francophone Western and Central Africa. International Journal of Educational Development. 2021; 80 :0738–0593. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102308. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Mizunoya, S., & Amaro, D. (2020). A statistical data analysis manual using Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS6) with a special focus on achieving the Sustainable Development Goals . UNICEF. https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/MICS6-manual-for-stats-data-analysis-English_2020_v2.pdf
Orazem, P. F., & Gunnarsson, L. V. (2004). Child labour, school attendance and performance: A review. Working paper 18213. International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour. 10.22004/ag.econ.18213
Oryoie Al, Alwang J, Tideman N. Child labor and household land holding: Theory and empirical evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development. 2017; 100 :45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.025. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Post D. Primary school student employment and academic achievement in Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. International Labour Review. 2011; 150 (3–4):255–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1564-913X.2011.00116.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Rosati F, Rossi M. Children’s working hours and school enrollment: Evidence from Pakistan and Nicaragua. The World Bank Economic Review. 2003; 17 (2):283–295. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhg023. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
Sim A, Suryadarma D, Suryahadi A. The consequences of child market work on the growth of human capital. World Development. 2017; 91 :144–155. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.007. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
UNICEF (2019). Guidelines for adapting the foundational learning module to non-multiple indicator cluster household surveys . https://data.unicef.org/resources/guidelines-adapting-foundational-module-non-mics/
UNICEF (2021). MICS6 indicator list: Indicators and definitions . https://mics.unicef.org/tools
United Nations (2015). Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong opportunities for all SDG indicators. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/goal-04/
Woldehanna T, Gebremedhin A. Is child work detrimental to the educational achievement of children? Results from Young Lives Study in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Economics. 2017; 26 :123–151. [ Google Scholar ]
World Bank (2021). World development indicators . https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/

Search Menu
Advance articles
Editor's Choice
Supplements
Author Guidelines
Submission Site
Open Access
About Journal of Public Health
About the Faculty of Public Health of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom
Editorial Board
Self-Archiving Policy
Dispatch Dates
Advertising and Corporate Services
Journals Career Network
Journals on Oxford Academic
Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

Introduction, methodology.

< Previous

Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts of child labor on child’s health in low- and middle-income countries

Article contents
Figures & tables
Supplementary Data

Abdalla Ibrahim, Salma M Abdalla, Mohammed Jafer, Jihad Abdelgadir, Nanne de Vries, Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts of child labor on child’s health in low- and middle-income countries, Journal of Public Health , Volume 41, Issue 1, March 2019, Pages 18–26, https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy018

Permissions Icon Permissions

To summarize current evidence on the impacts of child labor on physical and mental health.

We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for studies that included participants aged 18 years or less, conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and reported quantitative data. Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and assessment of study quality.

A total of 25 studies were identified, the majority of which were cross-sectional. Child labor was found to be associated with a number of adverse health outcomes, including but not limited to poor growth, malnutrition, higher incidence of infectious and system-specific diseases, behavioral and emotional disorders, and decreased coping efficacy. Quality of included studies was rated as fair to good.

Child labor remains a major public health concern in LMICs, being associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes. Current efforts against child labor need to be revisited, at least in LMICs. Further studies following a longitudinal design, and using common methods to assess the health impact of child labor in different country contexts would inform policy making.

For decades, child labor has been an important global issue associated with inadequate educational opportunities, poverty and gender inequality. 1 Not all types of work carried out by children are considered child labor. Engagement of children or adolescents in work with no influence on their health and schooling is usually regarded positive. The International Labor Organization (ILO) describes child labor as ‘work that deprives children of their childhood, potential and dignity, and that is harmful to physical and mental development’. 2 This definition includes types of work that are mentally, physically, socially or morally harmful to children; or disrupts schooling.

The topic gained scientific attention with the industrial revolution. Research conducted in the UK, because of adverse outcomes in children, resulted in acts for child labor in 18 02. 3 Many countries followed the UK, in recognition of the associated health risks. The ILO took its first stance in 1973 by setting the minimum age for work. 4 Nevertheless, the ILO and other international organizations that target the issue failed to achieve goals. Child labor was part of the Millennium Development Goals, adopted by 191 nations in 20 00 5 to be achieved by 2015. Subsequently, child labor was included in the Sustainable Development Goals, 6 which explicitly calls for eradication of child labor by 2030.

Despite the reported decline in child labor from 1995 to 2000, it remains a major concern. In 2016, it was estimated that ~150 million children under the age of 14 are engaged in labor worldwide, with most of them working under circumstances that denies them a playful childhood and jeopardize their health. 7 Most working children are 11–14 years, but around 60 million are 5–11 years old. 7 There are no exact numbers of the distribution of child labor globally; however, available statistics show that 96% of child workers are in Africa, Asia and Latin America. 1

Research into the impacts of child labor suggests several associations between child labor and adverse health outcomes. Parker 1 reported that child labor is associated with certain exposures like silica in industries, and HIV infection in prostitution. Additionally, as child labor is associated with maternal illiteracy and poverty, children who work are more susceptible to malnutrition, 1 which predisposes them to various diseases.

A meta-analysis on the topic was published in 20 07. 8 However, authors reported only an association of child labor with higher mortality and morbidity than in the general population, without reporting individual outcome specific effects. 8 Another meta-analysis investigated the effects of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), including child labor, on health. They reported that ACEs are risk factors for many adverse health outcomes. 9

To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that attempts to summarize current evidence on the impacts of child labor on both physical and mental health, based on specific outcomes. We review the most recent evidence on the health impacts of child labor in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) according to the World Bank classification. We provide an informative summary of current studies of the impacts of child labor, and reflect upon the progress of anti-child labor policies and laws.

Search strategy

We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect databases. Search was restricted to publications from year 1997 onwards. Only studies written in English were considered. Our search algorithm was [(‘child labor’ OR ‘child labor’ OR ‘working children’ OR ‘occupational health’ OR ‘Adolescent work’ OR ‘working adolescents’) AND (Health OR medical)]. The first third of the algorithm was assigned to titles/abstracts to ensure relevance of the studies retrieved, while the rest of the terms were not. On PubMed, we added […AND (poverty OR ‘low income’ OR ‘developing countries’)] to increase the specificity of results; otherwise, the search results were ~60 times more, with the majority of studies being irrelevant.

Study selection

Studies that met the following criteria were considered eligible: sample age 18 years or less; study was conducted in LMICs; and quantitative data was reported.

Two authors reviewed the titles obtained, a.o. to exclude studies related to ‘medical child labor’ as in childbirth. Abstracts of papers retained were reviewed, and subsequently full studies were assessed for inclusion criteria. Two authors assessed the quality of studies using Downs and Black tool for quality assessment. 10 The tool includes 27 items, yet not all items fit every study. In such cases, we used only relevant items. Total score was the number of items positively evaluated. Studies were ranked accordingly (poor, fair, good) (Table 1 ).

Characteristics of studies included

* The quality is based on the percentage of Downs and Black 10 tool, < 50% = poor, 50–75% = fair, > 75% = good.

** BMI, body mass index.

*** HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.

Data extraction and management

Two authors extracted the data using a standardized data extraction form. It included focus of study (i.e. physical and/or mental health), exposure (type of child labor), country of study, age group, gender, study design, reported measures (independent variables) and outcome measures (Table 1 ). The extraction form was piloted to ensure standardization of data collection. A third author then reviewed extracted data. Disagreements were solved by discussion.

Search results

A flow diagram (Fig. 1 ) shows the studies selection process. We retrieved 1050 studies on PubMed and 833 studies on Science Direct, with no duplicates in the search results. We also retrieved 23 studies through screening of the references, following the screening by title of retrieved studies. By reviewing title and abstract, 1879 studies were excluded. After full assessment of the remaining studies, 25 were included.

Study selection process.

Characteristics of included studies

Among the included studies ten documented only prevalence estimates of physical diseases, six documented mental and psychosocial health including abuse, and nine reported the prevalence of both mental and physical health impacts (Table 1 ). In total, 24 studies were conducted in one country; one study included data from the Living Standard Measurement Study of 83 LMIC. 8

In total, 12 studies compared outcomes between working children and a control group (Table 1 ). Concerning physical health, many studies reported the prevalence of general symptoms (fever, cough and stunting) or diseases (malnutrition, anemia and infectious diseases). Alternatively, some studies documented prevalence of illnesses or symptoms hypothesized to be associated with child labor (Table 1 ). The majority of studies focusing on physical health conducted clinical examination or collected blood samples.

Concerning mental and psychosocial health, the outcomes documented included abuse with its different forms, coping efficacy, emotional disturbances, mood and anxiety disorders. The outcomes were measured based on self-reporting and using validated measures, for example, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), in local languages.

The majority of studies were ranked as of ‘good quality’, with seven ranked ‘fair’ and one ranked ‘poor’ (Table 1 ). The majority of them also had mixed-gender samples, with only one study restricted to females. 24 In addition, valid measures were used in most studies (Table 1 ). Most studies did not examine the differences between genders.

Child labor and physical health

Fifteen studies examined physical health effects of child labor, including nutritional status, physical growth, work-related illnesses/symptoms, musculoskeletal pain, HIV infection, systematic symptoms, infectious diseases, tuberculosis and eyestrain. Eight studies measured physical health effects through clinical examination or blood samples, in addition to self-reported questionnaires. All studies in which a comparison group was used reported higher prevalence of physical diseases in the working children group.

Two studies were concerned with physical growth and development. A study conducted in Pakistan, 11 reported that child labor is associated with wasting, stunting and chronic malnutrition. A similar study conducted in India compared physical growth and genital development between working and non-working children and reported that child labor is associated with lower BMI, shorter stature and delayed genital development in working boys, while no significant differences were found among females. 12

Concerning work-related illnesses and injuries, a study conducted in Bangladesh reported that there is a statistically significant positive association between child labor and the probability to report any injury or illness, tiredness/exhaustion, body injury and other health problems. Number of hours worked and the probability of reporting injury and illness were positively correlated. Younger children were more likely to suffer from backaches and other health problems (infection, burns and lung diseases), while probability of reporting tiredness/exhaustion was greater in the oldest age group. Furthermore, the frequency of reporting any injury or illness increases with the number of hours worked, with significant variation across employment sectors. 13 A study in Iran reported that industrial workrooms were the most common place for injury (58.2%). Falling from heights or in horizontal surface was the most common mechanism of injury (44%). None of the patients was using a preventive device at the time of injury. Cuts (49.6%) were the most commonly reported injuries. 14

Other studies that investigated the prevalence of general symptoms in working children in Pakistan, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Indonesia reported that child labor is negatively associated with health. 15 – 19 Watery eyes, chronic cough and diarrhea were common findings, in addition to history of a major injury (permanent loss of an organ, hearing loss, bone fractures, permanent disability). 20 One study, conducted in India reported that working children suffered from anemia, gastrointestinal tract infections, vitamin deficiencies, respiratory tract infections, skin diseases and high prevalence of malnutrition. 21 Another study—of poor quality—in India reported that child labor was associated with higher incidence of infectious diseases compared to non-working children. 22

Only a few studies focused on specific diseases. A study in Brazil compared the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain between working and non-working children. Authors reported that the prevalence of pain in the neck, knee, wrist or hands, and upper back exceeded 15%. Workers in manufacturing had a significantly increased risk for musculoskeletal pain and back pain, while child workers in domestic services had 17% more musculoskeletal pain and 23% more back pain than non-workers. Awkward posture and heavy physical work were associated with musculoskeletal pain, while monotonous work, awkward posture and noise were associated with back pain. 23 A study in Nicaragua, which focused on children working in agriculture, reported that child labor in agriculture poses a serious threat to children’s health; specifically, acute pesticides poisoning. 24

A study conducted in India reported that the prevalence of eyestrain in child laborers was 25.9%, which was significantly more than the 12.4% prevalence in a comparison group. Prevalence was higher in boys and those who work more than 4 h daily. 25 Another study conducted in India documented that the difference between working and non-working children in the same area in respiratory morbidities (TB, hilar gland enlargement/calcification) was statistically significant. 26

A study in Iran explored the prevalence of viral infections (HIV, HCV and HBV) in working children. 27 The study reported that the prevalence among working street children was much higher than in general population. The 4.5% of children were HIV positive, 1.7% were hepatitis B positive and 2.6% hepatitis C positive. The likelihood of being HIV positive among working children of Tehran was increased by factors like having experience in trading sex, having parents who used drugs or parents infected with HCV.

Lastly, one study was a meta-analysis conducted on data of working children in 83 LMIC documented that child labor is significantly and positively related to adolescent mortality, to a population’s nutrition level, and to the presence of infectious diseases. 8

Child labor and mental health

Overall, all studies included, except one, 28 reported that child labor is associated with higher prevalence of mental and/or behavioral disorders. In addition, all studies concluded that child labor is associated with one or more forms of abuse.

A study conducted in Jordan reported a significant difference in the level of coping efficacy and psychosocial health between working non-schooled children, working school children and non-working school children. Non-working school children had a better performance on the SDQ scale. Coping efficacy of working non-schooled children was lower than that of the other groups. 29

A study conducted in Pakistan reported that the prevalence of behavioral problems among working children was 9.8%. Peer problems were most prevalent, followed by problems of conduct. 30 A study from Ethiopia 31 reported that emotional and behavioral disorders are more common among working children. However, another study in Ethiopia 28 reported a lower prevalence of mental/behavioral disorders in child laborers compared to non-working children. The stark difference between these two studies could be due to the explanation provided by Alem et al. , i.e. that their findings could have been tampered by selection bias or healthy worker effect.

A study concerned with child abuse in Bangladesh reported that the prevalence of abuse and child exploitation was widespread. Boys were more exposed. Physical assault was higher towards younger children while other types were higher towards older ones. 32 A similar study conducted in Turkey documented that 62.5% of the child laborers were subjected to abuse at their workplaces; 21.8% physical, 53.6% emotional and 25.2% sexual, 100% were subjected to physical neglect and 28.7% were subjected to emotional neglect. 33

One study focused on sexual assault among working females in Nigeria. They reported that the sexual assault rate was 77.7%. In 38.6% of assault cases, the assailant was a customer. Girls who were younger than 12 years, had no formal education, worked for more than 8 h/day, or had two or more jobs were more likely to experience sexual assault. 34

Main findings of this study

Through a comprehensive systematic review, we conclude that child labor continues to be a major public health challenge. Child labor continues to be negatively associated with the physical and psychological health of children involved. Although no cause–effect relation can be established, as all studies included are cross-sectional, studies documented higher prevalence of different health issues in working children compared to control groups or general population.

This reflects a failure of policies not only to eliminate child labor, but also to make it safer. Although there is a decline in the number of working children, the quality of life of those still engaged in child labor seems to remain low.

Children engaged in labor have poor health status, which could be precipitated or aggravated by labor. Malnutrition and poor growth were reported to be highly prevalent among working children. On top of malnutrition, the nature of labor has its effects on child’s health. Most of the studies adjusted for the daily working hours. Long working hours have been associated with poorer physical outcomes. 18 , 19 , 25 , 26 , 35 It was also reported that the likelihood of being sexually abused increased with increasing working hours. 34 The different types and sectors of labor were found to be associated with different health outcomes as well. 13 , 18 , 24 However, comparing between the different types of labor was not possible due to lack of data.

The majority of studies concluded that child labor is associated with higher prevalence of mental and behavioral disorders, as shown in the results. School attendance, family income and status, daily working hours and likelihood of abuse, in its different forms, were found to be associated with the mental health outcomes in working children. These findings are consistent with previous studies and research frameworks. 36

Child labor subjects children to abuse, whether verbally, physically or sexually which ultimately results in psychological disturbances and behavioral disorders. Moreover, peers and colleagues at work can affect the behavior of children, for example, smoking or drugs. The effects of child labor on psychological health can be long lasting and devastating to the future of children involved.

What is already known on this topic

Previous reviews have described different adverse health impacts of child labor. However, there were no previous attempts to review the collective health impacts of child labor. Working children are subjected to different risk factors, and the impacts of child labor are usually not limited to one illness. Initial evidence of these impacts was published in the 1920s. Since then, an increasing number of studies have used similar methods to assess the health impacts of child labor. Additionally, most of the studies are confined to a single country.

What this study adds

To our knowledge, this is the first review that provides a comprehensive summary of both the physical and mental health impacts of child labor. Working children are subjected to higher levels of physical and mental stress compared to non-working children and adults performing the same type of work. Unfortunately, the results show that these children are at risk of developing short and long-term health complications, physically or mentally.

Though previous systematic reviews conducted on the topic in 19 97 1 and 20 07 8 reported outcomes in different measures, our findings reflect similar severity of the health impacts of child labor. This should be alarming to organizations that set child labor as a target. We have not reviewed the policies targeting child labor here, yet our findings show that regardless of policies in place, further action is needed.

Most of the current literature about child labor follow a cross-sectional design, which although can reflect the health status of working children, it cannot establish cause–effect associations. This in turn affects strategies and policies that target child labor.

In addition, comparing the impacts of different labor types in different countries will provide useful information on how to proceed. Further research following a common approach in assessing child labor impacts in different countries is needed.

Limitations of this study

First, we acknowledge that all systematic reviews are subject to publication bias. Moreover, the databases used might introduce bias as most of the studies indexed by them are from industrialized countries. However, these databases were used for their known quality and to allow reproduction of the data. Finally, despite our recognition of the added value of meta-analytic methods, it was not possible to conduct one due to lack of a common definition for child labor, differences in inclusion and exclusion criteria, different measurements and different outcome measures. Nevertheless, to minimize bias, we employed rigorous search methods including an extensive and comprehensive search, and data extraction by two independent reviewers.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Parker DL . Child labor. The impact of economic exploitation on the health and welfare of children . Minn Med 1997 ; 80 : 10 – 2 .

Google Scholar

Hilowitz J . Child Labour: A Textbook for University Students . International Labour Office , 2004 .

Google Preview

Humphries J . Childhood and child labour in the British industrial revolution . Econ Hist Rev 2013 ; 66 ( 2 ): 395 – 418 .

Dahlén M . The negotiable child: the ILO child labour campaign 1919–1973. Diss . 2007 .

Sachs JD , McArthur JW . The millennium project: a plan for meeting the millennium development goals . Lancet 2005 ; 365 ( 9456 ): 347 – 53 .

Griggs D et al. Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet . Nature 2013 ; 495 ( 7441 ): 305 – 7 .

UNICEF . The state of the world’s children 2016: a fair chance for every child. Technical Report, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) 2016 .

Roggero P , Mangiaterra V , Bustreo F et al. The health impact of child labor in developing countries: evidence from cross-country data . Am J Public Health 2007 ; 97 ( 2 ): 271 – 5 .

Hughes K , Bellis MA , Hardcastle KA et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Lancet Public Health 2017 ; 2 ( 8 ): e356 – 66 .

Downs SH , Black N . The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions . J Epidemiol Community Health 1998 ; 52 ( 6 ): 377 – 84 .

Ali M , Shahab S , Ushijima H et al. Street children in Pakistan: a situational analysis of social conditions and nutritional status . Soc Sci Med 2004 ; 59 ( 8 ): 1707 – 17 .

Ambadekar NN , Wahab SN , Zodpey SP et al. Effect of child labour on growth of children . Public Health 1999 ; 113 ( 6 ): 303 – 6 .

Ahmed S , Ray R . Health consequences of child labour in Bangladesh . Demogr Res 2014 ; 30 : 111 – 50 .

Hosseinpour M , Mohammadzadeh M , Atoofi M . Work-related injuries with child labor in Iran . Eur J Pediatr Surg 2014 ; 24 ( 01 ): 117 – 20 .

Mohammed ES , Ewis AA , Mahfouz EM . Child labor in a rural Egyptian community: an epidemiological study . Int J Public Health 2014 ; 59 ( 4 ): 637 – 44 .

Nuwayhid IA , Usta J , Makarem M et al. Health of children working in small urban industrial shops . Occup Environ Med 2005 ; 62 ( 2 ): 86 – 94 .

Wolff FC . Evidence on the impact of child labor on child health in Indonesia, 1993–2000 . Econ Hum Biol 2008 ; 6 ( 1 ): 143 – 69 .

Hamdan-Mansour AM , Al-Gamal E , Sultan MK et al. Health status of working children in Jordan: comparison between working and nonworking children at schools and industrial sites . Open J Nurs 2013 ; 3 ( 01 ): 55 .

Tiwari RR , Saha A . Morbidity profile of child labor at gem polishing units of Jaipur, India . Int J Occup Environ Med 2014 ; 5 ( 3 ): 125 – 9 .

Khan H , Hameed A , Afridi AK . Study on child labour in automobile workshops of Peshawar, Pakistan, 2007 .

Banerjee SR , Bharati P , Vasulu TS et al. Whole time domestic child labor in metropolitan city of Kolkata, 2008 .

Daga AS , Working IN . Relative risk and prevalence of illness related to child labor in a rural block . Indian Pediatr 2000 ; 37 ( 12 ): 1359 – 60 .

Fassa AG , Facchini LA , Dall’Agnol MM et al. Child labor and musculoskeletal disorders: the Pelotas (Brazil) epidemiological survey . Public Health Rep 2005 ; 120 ( 6 ): 665 – 73 .

Corriols M , Aragón A . Child labor and acute pesticide poisoning in Nicaragua: failure to comply with children’s rights . Int J Occup Environ Health 2010 ; 16 ( 2 ): 175 – 82 .

Tiwari RR . Eyestrain in working children of footwear making units of Agra, India . Indian Pediatr 2013 ; 50 ( 4 ): 411 – 3 .

Tiwari RR , Saha A , Parikh JR . Respiratory morbidities among working children of gem polishing industries, India . Toxicol Ind Health 2009 ; 25 ( 1 ): 81 – 4 .

Foroughi M , Moayedi-Nia S , Shoghli A et al. Prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV among street and labour children in Tehran, Iran . Sex Transm Infect 2016 ; 93 ( 6 ): 421 – 23 .

Alem AA , Zergaw A , Kebede D et al. Child labor and childhood behavioral and mental health problems in Ethiopia . Ethiopian J Health Dev 2006 ; 20 ( 2 ): 119 – 26 .

Al-Gamal E , Hamdan-Mansour AM , Matrouk R et al. The psychosocial impact of child labour in Jordan: a national study . Int J Psychol 2013 ; 48 ( 6 ): 1156 – 64 .

Bandeali S , Jawad A , Azmatullah A et al. Prevalence of behavioural and psychological problems in working children . J Pak Med Assoc 2008 ; 58 ( 6 ): 345 .

Fekadu D , Alem A , Hägglöf B . The prevalence of mental health problems in Ethiopian child laborers . J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2006 Sep 1; 47 ( 9 ): 954 – 9 .

Hadi A . Child abuse among working children in rural Bangladesh: prevalence and determinants . Public Health 2000 ; 114 ( 5 ): 380 – 4 .

Öncü E , Kurt AÖ , Esenay FI et al. Abuse of working children and influencing factors, Turkey . Child Abuse Negl 2013 ; 37 ( 5 ): 283 – 91 .

Audu B , Geidam A , Jarma H . Child labor and sexual assault among girls in Maiduguri, Nigeria . Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009 Jan 31; 104 ( 1 ): 64 – 7 .

Gross R , Landfried B , Herman S . Height and weight as a reflection of the nutritional situation of school-aged children working and living in the streets of Jakarta . Soc Sci Med 1996 Aug 1; 43 ( 4 ): 453 – 8 .

Woodhead M . Psychosocial impacts of child work: a framework for research, monitoring and intervention . Int J Child Rts 2004 ; 12 : 321 .

developing countries
mental health
child labor

Email alerts

Citing articles via.

Recommend to your Library

Affiliations

Online ISSN 1741-3850
Print ISSN 1741-3842
About Oxford Academic
Publish journals with us
University press partners
What we publish
New features
Open access
Institutional account management
Rights and permissions
Get help with access
Accessibility
Advertising
Media enquiries
Oxford University Press
Oxford Languages
University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

Cookie settings
Cookie policy
Privacy policy
Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

Literature review of child labour

This comprehensive literature review of child labour summarises the literature on child time allocation, the types of work children participate in, the impact of work on schooling, health, and externalities associated with child work. It also considers the literature on the determinants of child time allocation (child labour) such as the influence of local labour markets, family interactions, the net return of schooling and poverty. Additionally, the paper discusses evidence on policy options aimed at influencing child labour.

The child labour crisis in Pakistan

LAHORE - Pakistan is facing a severe crisis of child labour, with the problem being deeply ingrained in the country’s economic and social fabric, with children as young as five years old being forced to work in dangerous and exploitative conditions. One of the main drivers of child labour in Pakistan is poverty. Many families are unable to afford basic necessities and are forced to send their children to work in order to survive. This is particularly true in rural areas, where poverty is widespread and opportunities for education and employment are limited. This results in children seeking employment wherever possible, with many industries being harmful for their health. A Pakistan Labour Survey in 2018 reports that 5.4% of those involved in child labour are forced to work in hazardous conditions, a figure that has since only increased. A major factor contributing to the child labour crisis in Pakistan is a lack of education. Many children are not able to attend school due to financial constraints or lack of access to education in their communities. Without education, these children are unable to acquire the skills and knowledge needed to secure better paying jobs in the future, and are instead forced to work in low-paying, unskilled jobs. The massive lack of female education has led to 67% of the total 12.5 million children engaged in some form of labour being girls, a number which will only increase should measures not be put into place to prevent it. A large amount of students only join school for exams, in order to obtain suitable results, whilst simultaneously working to provide for their families. The problem of child labour in Pakistan is further exacerbated by a lack of government regulation and enforcement. Despite laws and policies in place to protect children from exploitative labour practices, these are often not enforced, and employers are able to exploit children with impunity. This has resulted in an average of 1 in every 4 households employing a child for domestic work. Pakistan is known worldwide as one of the largest manufacturers of professional level footballs. However it often goes unnoticed that child labour plays a massive role in constructing these footballs. Due to the simple nature of the job, its easy for children to get involved, despite the average pay being around 50 cents per football made, which is below the minimum wage of the country. Keeping the constraints of poverty in mind, children, as well as their parents, are unable to speak out and are forced to work despite the poor conditions. The situation is further complicated by the fact that many of the industries in which children are employed, such as brick kilns and carpet weaving, are informal and operate outside of government oversight. This makes it difficult for authorities to monitor and regulate these industries, and to hold employers accountable for their actions. The child labour crisis in Pakistan is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a comprehensive and integrated approach to address. This includes measures to reduce poverty and improve access to education, as well as strong government regulation and enforcement to protect children from exploitative labour practices. Additionally, it is important to work with industry and employers to promote more ethical and responsible business practices, and to invest in programs that provide training and support to families and children affected by poverty. The child labour crisis in Pakistan is a serious problem that requires urgent action from the government, civil society, and the international community. By working together, we can help to break the cycle of poverty and exploitation that is trapping so many children in a life of dangerous and exploitative labour.

Supply, wholesale rates being monitored to check price hike: DC

By Waleed Qas im Bas hir

Related news, lesco recovers over rs 1m from 381 defaulters on 52nd day, commissioner sibi division visits dhq hospital dera bugti, special cleansing campaign initiated in province: pirkani, mild earthquake shakes lasbela, adjoining areas, five doctors among 8 new cases of congo virus reported in quetta, senator qadir condemns attacks on security forces in balochistan, ..., senator qadir condemns attacks on security forces in balochistan, dera ismail khan, israel rejectsus call for gaza ceasefire unless hostages freed, refugees return: un seeks safety, protection of women, children, 14 soldiers among 19 martyred in balochistan, kp terrorist attacks, govt, imf start initial talks for loan tranche, israel claims ground forces surrounding gaza as bombing toll mounts, media plays key role in development of society: pm, highlights from nawaz sharif's homecoming address at minar-e-pakistan, china’s lunar mission to launch pakistani satellite, justice isa visits jaranwala, vows to protect minority community, skardu gets international airport status, neelum jhelum hydropower project resumes power generation, sharif’s politics & establishment, israeli barbarism, managing your business finances: a guide to ..., managing your business finances: a guide to financial ..., false promises and massses, the akhaura-agartala railway.

https://www.nation.com.pk/epaper_image/medium/2023-11-04/Lahore/epaper_img_1699072087.jpg

Sad State of Poorly Governed Affairs

Procedure for filling complaint and its ..., procedure for filling complaint and its importance in nab, india’s general elections 2024; a prospect ..., india’s general elections 2024; a prospect of indian ..., strategies for teachers to identify social, ..., strategies for teachers to identify social, emotional, and ..., food for thought: relationship between ..., food for thought: relationship between nutrition and cancer ..., educating afghan students, digital inclusivity, a glorious victory, currency crisis, perks’ overload, no respite for the public, the children of gaza are crying out, academic toxicity, muslim unity, vigilante justice, epaper - nawaiwaqt.

Newsletter Subscription

Advertisement.

NIPCO House, 4 - Shaharah e Fatima Jinnah,

Lahore, Pakistan

Tel: +92 42 36367580 | Fax : +92 42 36367005

Advertise With Us
Privacy Policy

Media Update: United Nations Pakistan, 10 June 2021

10 June 2021

This Media Update includes:

UNICEF - ILO : PRESS RELEASE : Child labour rises to 160 million – first increase in two decades

UNICEF - ILO

Press release.

Child labour rises to 160 million – first increase in two decades

The International Labour Organization and UNICEF warn 9 million additional children at risk as a result of COVID-19 pandemic

NEW YORK/GENEVA, 10 June 2021 – The number of children in child labour has risen to 160 million worldwide – an increase of 8.4 million children in the last four years – with millions more at risk due to the impacts of COVID-19, according to a new report by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and UNICEF.

Child Labour: Global estimates 2020, trends and the road forward – released ahead of World Day Against Child Labour on 12th June – warns that progress to end child labour has stalled for the first time in 20 years, reversing the previous downward trend that saw child labour fall by 94 million between 2000 and 2016.

The report points to a significant rise in the number of children aged 5 to 11 years in child labour, who now account for just over half of the total global figure. The number of children aged 5 to 17 years in hazardous work – defined as work that is likely to harm their health, safety or morals – has risen by 6.5 million to 79 million since 2016.

“The new estimates are a wake-up call. We cannot stand by while a new generation of children is put at risk,” said ILO Director-General Guy Ryder. “Inclusive social protection allows families to keep their children in school even in the face of economic hardship. Increased investment in rural development and decent work in agriculture is essential. We are at a pivotal moment and much depends on how we respond. This is a time for renewed commitment and energy, to turn the corner and break the cycle of poverty and child labour.”

In sub-Saharan Africa, population growth, recurrent crises, extreme poverty, and inadequate social protection measures have led to an additional 16.6 million children in child labour over the past four years.

Even in regions where there has been some headway since 2016, such as Asia and the Pacific, and Latin America and the Caribbean, COVID-19 is endangering that progress.

The report warns that globally, 9 million additional children are at risk of being pushed into child labour by the end of 2022 as a result of the pandemic. A simulation model shows this number could rise to 46 million if they don’t have access to critical social protection coverage.

Additional economic shocks and school closures caused by COVID-19 mean that children already in child labour may be working longer hours or under worsening conditions, while many more may be forced into the worst forms of child labour due to job and income losses among vulnerable families.

“We are losing ground in the fight against child labour, and the last year has not made that fight any easier,” said UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore. “Now, well into a second year of global lockdowns, school closures, economic disruptions, and shrinking national budgets, families are forced to make heart-breaking choices. We urge governments and international development banks to prioritize investments in programmes that can get children out of the workforce and back into school, and in social protection programmes that can help families avoid making this choice in the first place.”

Other key findings in the report include:

· The agriculture sector accounts for 70 per cent of children in child labour (112 million) followed by 20 per cent in services (31.4 million) and 10 per cent in industry (16.5 million).

· Nearly 28 per cent of children aged 5 to 11 years and 35 per cent of children aged 12 to 14 years in child labour are out of school.

· Child labour is more prevalent among boys than girls at every age. When household chores performed for at least 21 hours per week are taken into account, the gender gap in child labour narrows.

· The prevalence of child labour in rural areas (14 per cent) is close to three times higher than in urban areas (5 per cent).

Children in child labour are at risk of physical and mental harm. Child labour compromises children’s education, restricting their rights and limiting their future opportunities, and leads to vicious inter-generational cycles of poverty and child labour.

To reverse the upward trend in child labour, the ILO and UNICEF are calling for:

· Adequate social protection for all, including universal child benefits.

· Increased spending on quality education and getting all children back into school - including children who were out of school before COVID-19.

· Promotion of decent work for adults, so families don’t have to resort to children helping to generate family income.

· An end to harmful gender norms and discrimination that influence child labour.

· Investment in child protection systems, agricultural development, rural public services, infrastructure and livelihoods.

As part of the International Year for the Elimination of Child Labour , the global partnership Alliance 8.7 , of which UNICEF and ILO are partners, is encouraging member States, business, trade unions, civil society, and regional and international organizations to redouble their efforts in the global fight against child labour by making concrete action pledges.

During a week of action from 10 – 17 June, ILO Director-General Guy Ryder and UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore will join other high-level speakers and youth advocates at a high-level event during the International Labour Conference to discuss the release of the new global estimates and the roadmap ahead.

UN entities involved in this initiative

Goals we are supporting through this initiative.

Child Labour in Pakistan 2023 Essay Articles Presentation

Children are the greatest blessings for any family. They are the innocent and beautiful creation of Allah Almighty. Developed countries take good care of their children’s are the future of every nation. From the past few years, Pakistan is having very serious issues that destroy the economy of our country. Among these child labor is a very major issue in Pakistan. According to (ILO), this is defined as during an early age a child starts doing work, a child does work too hard, a child works because of socially, materialistic and psychologically pressure and he/she serves himself to labor at a very low cost.

It is the biggest dream of every parent that their children have the basic needs of life. Moreover, it is the right of every child to enjoy their life with the fullest without doing any hard work.

But in Pakistan, some families are present who don’t have enough money to spend on their child’s education or to fulfill their basic needs of life. If one overview all over the world then in 2023 in Pakistan child Labour get the shape of alarm full situation.

One can use this essay in the English Language as a presentation or among articles that cover major aspects of this problem. From the recent survey, it is found that around 4 million children are working as labor in Pakistan and unfortunately the rate is increasing day by day.

There are several causes of child labor but poverty is thought of as the root of child labor. From the survey, it is found that more than 25% of people are below the poverty line because these are needed for their essential needs like clothes, foods, education, shelter, etc. To fulfill their basic need people force their children to do struggle at an early age.

Another major cause of child labor is that the people in the rural areas of Pakistan are not aware of the education. They don’t have any kind of realization of education. They are not familiar with the advantages of education.

There is a need to aware them of the educational importance that if they invest in their child’s education then in future children will become the arm of their parents. These poor people always thought that labor or work is much better than getting an education.

An old Graph:

Our government should take radical steps to reduce child labor in Pakistan. This can be lessening if our Government increase the job opportunities and increases the income of every family by making the departments or institute where children enhance their skills so that they earn by self without exploiting themselves, by developing or organizing social services that help families and children’s to fight or survive against the crises like natural calamities or disease and many other critical problems.

Moreover, it is the duty of the government that they should be made education free and compulsory for every child, they should provide free books to the school. The government should take strict actions to raise this issue and stand in the leading countries if they reduce child labor and provide the best education to their children.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Faisal Movers Ticket Price List 2023 Online Booking Number
Yokohama Tyres Price in Pakistan 2023 Dealers in Lahore, Karachi,…
China Motorcycle Price in Pakistan 2023
Brighto Paint Price List 2023 in Pakistan Distemper, Weathershield, Super…
Driving License Karachi Fees 2023 Verification Online Apply
Silkasia Andaz Collection 2013 for Women
Mobilink New Pro Plans For Business Customers
5th 8th Class Position Holders 2018 Highest Marks
Best Acne Makeup Tips
Ather Shahzad Bridal Makeup Charges Prices Rates
22 Wheeler Truck Price in Pakistan 2023
Ghani Textiles Spring Summer Collection 2013 For Women
Date Sheet 11th 12th Class 2015 Faisalabad Board
Gujranwala Board Assessment Scheme for 9th Class 2021 BISEGRW
Best Shoes Brands of Pakistan

IMAGES

Implementing Laws Against Child Labour: A Case Study of Pakistan, 978-3
Child labor in the pakistan report
(PDF) CHILD DOMESTIC LABOUR IN PAKISTAN: OVERVIEW, ISSUES AND TESTABLE
(PDF) Child labour in Pakistan: Addressing supply and demand side
child labor in Pakistan
Child Labour In Pakistan Causes And Effects Essay

VIDEO

’3 வேளை உணவுக்கு இவ்வளவு சித்திரவதையா?’
child labour in pakistan
Child Labor in Pakistan
Pakistan Literature Festival 2023
#sad #shorts #viral #poorboy #Maasimuseebat
Labour life/Labour life Saudi Arabia/vs Pakistan 🙄#shorts

COMMENTS

(PDF) A Survey of Literature on Child Labour
PDF | On Sep 20, 2016, Sarbajit Chaudhuri and others published A Survey of Literature on Child Labour | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
Child labour in Pakistan: consequences on children's health
Child Labor in Pakistan: Investigating the Role of Pakistani Government for Controlling Child Labor Article Full-text available Sep 2021 Shaffaq Khalid Uffaq Khalid View Show abstract...
Implications of Child Labor in Pakistan: A review
This paper presents a review analysis of various factors of child labor in rural and urban areas of Pakistan. Child labor has been considered a major challenge worldwide.
Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts
Methods We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for studies that included participants aged 18 years or less, conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and reported quantitative data. Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and assessment of study quality. Results
PDF 2019 Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor: Pakistan
2 BUREAU OF INTERNATIONAL LABOR AFFAIRS 2019 FINDINGS ON THE WORST FORMS OF CHILD LABOR Based on a review of available information, Table 2 provides an overview of children's work by sector and activity. ... LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR CHILD LABOR Pakistan has ratified most key international conventions concerning child labor (Table 3). Table 3 ...
PDF 2021 Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor: Pakistan
2021 FINDINGS ON THE WORST FORMS OF CHILD LABOR 1 In 2021, Pakistan made minimal advancement because it continued to implement practices that delay advancement ... 2 BUREAU OF INTERNATIONAL LABOR AFFAIRS Based on a review of available information, Table 2 provides an overview of children's work by sector and activity.
PDF 2020 Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor: Pakistan
II. LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR CHILD LABOR Pakistan has ratified most key international conventions concerning child labor (Table 3). Table 3. Ratification of International Conventions on Child Labor Convention Ratification ILO C. 138, Minimum Age ILO C. 182, Worst Forms of Child Labor UN CRC UN CRC Optional Protocol on Armed Conflict
Situation analysis of child labour in Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative
Abstract In Karachi, large employment opportunities, burgeoning population and the availability of cheap labour might be the contributing factors for the increasing prevalence of child labour. A literature review was conducted in 2007 that included published and unpublished literature since 2000.
Child labor as a barrier to foundational skills: Evidence from
According to the International Labor Organization, at least 160 million children ages 5 to 17 around the world were involved in some form of child labor at the beginning of 2020, including 79 million children performing hazardous labor. This article uses recent representative data from Bangladesh and Pakistan to investigate the relationship between foundational skills and child labor ...
PDF Scoping study relating to child labour in domestic work in Pakistan
1. Provide rigorous evidence on the existence and possible magnitude of child labour in domestic work, its gender dimension, and on the characteristics and conditions of work, main hazards and exposure to violence and socio-economic environment where child labour occurs. 2. Identify relevant knowledge gaps; 3.
Child labor as a barrier to foundational skills: Evidence from
Similarly, Bhalotra and Heady used data from Pakistan and Ghana, and Rosati and Rossi used data from Pakistan and Nicaragua. In the literature, we observed that attention to Asian countries was limited, compared with attention to Latin American and Sub-Saharan African countries. ... Child labour: A review of recent theory and evidence with ...
PDF An Empirical Analysis of Child Labor: Evidence From Pakistan
The study investigates the impact of education on child labor in Pakistan. The study is based on Pakistan Labor Force Survey (2014-15) and logit and probit models are used for estimation ... The Section 2 provides the review of literature. Data and methodology are explained in Section 3 while results are discussed in Section 4. Lastly ...
(PDF) Child Labor in Pakistan: Estimates and Determinants
Chapter III is about review of literature. ... According to the Minister the law would be implemented from January 2001 and before the year 2005 there would be no child or bonded labour in Pakistan.
Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts
Other studies that investigated the prevalence of general symptoms in working children in Pakistan, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Indonesia reported that child labor is negatively associated with health. 15- 19 Watery eyes, chronic cough and diarrhea were common findings, in addition to history of a major injury (permanent loss of an organ ...
(PDF) Situation analysis of child labour in Karachi, Pakistan: A
Abstract In Karachi, large employment opportunities, burgeoning population and the availability of cheap labour might be the contributing factors for the increasing prevalence of child...
Child Labor in Pakistan: Causes, Consequences and Prevention
Abstract This article addresses the underexplored but persistent problem of child labour in Pakistan. Child labour is a constitutionally declared crime in Pakistan yet one can see a little progress in eliminating the scourge of child labour from Pakistan. In fact, it is on the rise.
Review Article Situation analysis of child labour in Karachi, Pakistan
Abstract In Karachi, large employment opportunities, burgeoning population and the availability of cheap labour might be the contributing factors for the increasing prevalence of child labour. A literature review was conducted in 2007 that included published and unpublished literature since 2000.
PDF Child Labor in Pakistan: Causes, Consequences and Prevention
[email protected]. pk This article addresses the underexplored but persistent problem of child labour in Pakistan. Child labour is a constitutionally declared crime in Pakistan yet one can see a little progress in eliminating the scourge of child labour from Pakistan. In fact, it is on the rise. What causes child labour?
Child Labour in Pakistan: Way Out Analyzing Constitutional Mandate
The study undertaken attempts to identify the reasons behind child labour and to assess the socio-economic related problems faced by the working children. This study further analysis the effectiveness, sufficiency and potential of the constitutional provisions concerning children's rights as committed in the Constitution, 1973. (1), 201-208 ...
Literature review of child labour
Download This comprehensive literature review of child labour summarises the literature on child time allocation, the types of work children participate in, the impact of work on schooling, health, and externalities associated with child work.
The child labour crisis in Pakistan
The child labour crisis in Pakistan is a serious problem that requires urgent action from the government, civil society, and the international community. By working together, we can help to break the cycle of poverty and exploitation that is trapping so many children in a life of dangerous and exploitative labour. LDA seals another 36 properties.
Understanding the role of structural factors and realities in
2. Literature review. Child labour is a contentious issue for which there is no universal definition. Commonly, child labour is defined as labour that robs children of their formative childhood and dignity and harms their physical and mental health (ILO, Citation 2018).ILO's definition of child labour is primarily statistical and includes the following terms: "age of the child," "the ...
Media Update: United Nations Pakistan, 10 June 2021
Child labour rises to 160 million - first increase in two decades. The International Labour Organization and UNICEF warn 9 million additional children at risk as a result of COVID-19 pandemic. NEW YORK/GENEVA, 10 June 2021 - The number of children in child labour has risen to 160 million worldwide - an increase of 8.4 million children in ...
Child Labour in Pakistan 2023 Essay Articles Presentation
From the recent survey, it is found that around 4 million children are working as labor in Pakistan and unfortunately the rate is increasing day by day. There are several causes of child labor but poverty is thought of as the root of child labor. From the survey, it is found that more than 25% of people are below the poverty line because these ...

Situation analysis of child labour in Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative study

Publication types

Child labor as a barrier to foundational skills: Evidence from Bangladesh and Pakistan

Working on a manuscript?

Review of literature

Child labor and educational outcomes

Challenges of defining child labor

Country context

The dependent variable, foundational skills

Independent variable, child labor

Control variables

Descriptive results

Regression results

Author information

Corresponding author

Additional information

About this article

Share this article

Child labor as a barrier to foundational skills: Evidence from Bangladesh and Pakistan

Vanika Grover

Review of literature

Child labor and educational outcomes

Challenges of defining child labor

Country context

The dependent variable, foundational skills

Independent variable, child labor

Control variables

Descriptive results

Regression results

Biographies

Contributor Information

Article Contents

Child labor and health: a systematic literature review of the impacts of child labor on child’s health in low- and middle-income countries

Search strategy

Study selection

Data extraction and management

Search results

Characteristics of included studies

Child labor and physical health

Child labor and mental health

Main findings of this study

What is already known on this topic

What this study adds

Limitations of this study

Compliance with ethical standards

Email alerts

Affiliations

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Literature review of child labour

Related News

The child labour crisis in Pakistan

By Waleed Qas im Bas hir

Sad State of Poorly Governed Affairs

Newsletter Subscription

Media Update: United Nations Pakistan, 10 June 2021

UNICEF - ILO

UN entities involved in this initiative

Child Labour in Pakistan 2023 Essay Articles Presentation

Leave a Reply

IMAGES

VIDEO

COMMENTS